Upload
ledat
View
231
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 2
Exercise
Pick a foreign language whose structure you are familiar with (you do not have to speak it fluently, so Latin would work as well). Think of the ways this language differs from your native language (or – alternatively – English). On a sheet of paper write down a feature from each of the following domains for which you know that this language differs from your native language (or English):
• phonology
• morphology
• syntax
Do not include any obvious phonological differences in the realization of individual words or morphemes. Can you think of an example for each of the domains?
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 3
Exercise
B. Language X vs. language Y (Part II)
Build groups of 3–5 students, so that every member of the group chose a different language during the previous exercise. In group, pick one feature for each domain and fill out a table similar to Table 1.1 for all the languages considered by the group members.
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 5
The linguistic landscape
There are between 7000-8000 attested languages (Ethnologue, Glottolog)
These languages belong to 432 macro families (Glottolog)
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 6
Structural diversity
«It is a peculiar fact about linguistics that practically none of the astonishing typological features eventually discovered empirically have been anticipated through prior deduction.»
«Languages (...) differ (...) without limit and in unpredictable ways.» (Joos 1957: 96)
Evans, Nicholas, p. 44
Hai đú.a bo? nhau là ti gia-đình thàng chông.
two individual leave each.other be because.of family guy husband
‘They divorced because of his family.’
Vietnamese (Nguyen 1997: 223, cited in Haspelmath & Simms 2010)
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 8
Paasi-nngil-luinnar-para ilaa-juma-sutit.
understand-not-completely-1SG.SBJ.3SG.OBJ.IND come-want-2SG.PTCP
‘I didn’t understand at all that you wanted to come along.’
West-Greenlandic (Fortescue 1984: 36, cited in Haspelmath & Simms (2010)
Structural diversity
Huánuco Quechua (Peru) Juan aywa-n Juan.NOM go-3 ‘Juan goes.’ Juan Pedro-ta maqa-n Juan.NOM Pedro-ACC hit-3 ‘Juan hits Pedro.’
Yup’ik (Alaska) Doris-aq ayallruuq Doris-ABS traveled ‘Doris traveled.’ Tom-am Doris-aq cingallrua Tom-ERG Doris-ABS greet ‘Tom greets Doris.’
From Payne (1997) Describing morphosyntax. Cambridge: CUP.
Structural diversity
Huánuco Quechua (Peru) Juan aywa-n Juan.NOM go-3 ‘Juan goes.’ Juan Pedro-ta maqa-n Juan.NOM Pedro-ACC hit-3 ‘Juan hits Pedro.’
Yup’ik (Alaska) Doris-aq ayallruuq Doris-ABS traveled ‘Doris traveled.’ Tom-am Doris-aq cingallrua Tom-ERG Doris-ABS greet ‘Tom greets Doris.’
Structural diversity
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 11
Hasan öküz-ü aldi Hasan ox-ACC bought ‘Hasan bought the ox.’
The farmer killed the duckling
lladdodd y ddraig y dyn
killed the dragon the man
‘The dragon killed the man.’
nahita ny mpianatra ny vehivavy
saw the student the woman
‘The woman saw the student
toto yahosiye kamara
man it-grabbed-him jaguar
‘The jaguar grabbed the man.’
Turkish: SOV
English: SVO
Welsh: VSO
Malagasy: VOS
Hixkaryana: OVS
Structural diversity
• a typology = simply a categorization of some range of
phenomena into various types
• to “typologize” something = to group its parts into
types.
• typological linguists are people who like to group
languages into well-defined and useful types
• a typology is useful when it makes “predictions”
about multiple characteristics of the items being
typologized, that is, if we know that a language is of
type X, we also know that it has Y
Linguistic typology
Why bother?
• Typology helps linguists understand the range and
limits of possible variation among human languages
• If logically possible types are found to be very rare or
nonexistent, that may provide some insight into how
the human mind works
• If patterns are geographically skewed, typology may
shed light on human population history.
• Thus language typology can give us a “window” on
the mind and communication as well as on our history
as cultural beings.
Linguistic typology
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 15
The typological enterprise
Possible typology of typologies:
(i) holistic typology
(ii) feature-based universalist typology
(iii) distributional typology
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 16
Holistic typology «Jede Sprache ist ein System, dessen sämmtliche Theile organisch zusammenhängen und zusammenwirken. Man ahnt, keiner dieser Theile dürfte fehlen oder anders sein, ohne dass das Ganze verändert würde. Es scheint aber auch, als wären in der Sprachphysiognomie gewisse Züge entscheidender als andere. Diese Züge gälte es zu ermitteln; und dann müsste untersucht werden,welche andere Eigenthümlichkeiten regelmässig mit ihnen zusammentreffen (…) Dürfte man ein ungeborenes Kind taufen, ich würde den Namen Typologie wählen.»
H.G. von der Gabelentz
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 17
Holistic typology Goal: classify languages as a whole
Explanatory model (in the early years): cultural-historical development, usually in evaluative terms.
Von Schlegel bros.
Three types of languages: - No-structure languages (Chinese) - Agglutinating lgs (Turkish) - Inflecting languages (Latin)
1
2 3
Latin
Turkish Chinese
Holistic typology
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 19
Universals J. Greenberg
Linguistic typology as an approach to linguistic theory that uncovers and attempts to determine the limits of human language by looking for (near-) universal patterns in language structure and to explain them in terms of linguistic function.
Word order correlations - with holistic flavour, but functional explanations
OV GEN N Postpositions A N ... Head-final
VO N GEN Prepositions N A ... Head-initial
One design principle for word order for the entire language is cognitively «cheaper».
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 20
Universals
Matthew S. Dryer. 2013. Order of Subject, Object and Verb. In: Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/81, Accessed on 2016-01-15.)
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 21
Universals
Absolute universals (all languages have X) Statistical universals (A large number of languages - i.e. significantly above chance level - have X) Implicational universals (if a language has X, it also has Y) - this also comes in absolute and statistical flavours.
The number hierarchy (Corbett 2000: 38) singular > plural > dual > trial
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 22
Distribution
Matthew S. Dryer. 2013. Order of Subject, Object and Verb. In: Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/81, Accessed on 2016-01-15.)
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 23
Distribution Typology as a population science that studies the distribution of cross-linguistic patterns, with the aim of uncovering the principles determining this distribution.
“Instead of asking “what’s possible?”, more and more typologists ask “what’s where why?”. Asking “what’s where?” targets universal preferences as much as geographical or genealogical skewings.”
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 24
Course set-up
Experiencing the process of doing typological research
Formulate research question
Decide what and how to
measure
Collect data
Summarize data Analyze
data
Interpret results
1
2
3
4
5
6
Report results
7
Course set-up
Typological research (ideally)
Reformulate research question
Decide what else to
measure
Collect more /other
data
Summarize data again Analyze data
in a different way
Interpret results again
Report results
Typological research (really)
Course set-up
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 27
Approximate (!) schedule
Date Topic Literature (if available)
25-2 Introduction 1
3-3 Inflectional morphology 2.2
10-3 Comparing languages 3
17-3 Case and agreement variables 4.2
24-3 Sampling, data sources, database design 5
7-4 Introduction to R (bring your computer) Appendix 1
14-4 Data exploration and visualization (bring your computer) -
21-4 Data exploration and visualization (bring your computer) -
28-4 Hypothesis testing (bring your computer) -
12-5 Patterns and explanations in typology -
19-5 Reporting -
26-5 TBA
2-6 TBA
Linguistic Typology FS2016, class I 28
Approximate (!) schedule
Date Topic Literature (if available)
25-2 Introduction 1
3-3 Inflectional morphology 2.2
10-3 Comparing languages 3
17-3 Case and agreement variables 4.2
24-3 Sampling, data sources, database design 5
7-4 Introduction to R (bring your computer) Appendix 1
14-4 Data exploration and visualization (bring your computer) -
21-4 Data exploration and visualization (bring your computer) -
28-4 Hypothesis testing (bring your computer) -
12-5 Patterns and explanations in typology -
19-5 Reporting -
26-5 TBA
2-6 TBA
Milestone 1: fix database structure
Milestone 2: finish collecting data (first
round) Milestone 3:
finish correcting data
Milestone 4: draft paper
Milestone 5: deadline 20-6
Comparability and variables
Section Name Contents Class
1 Introduction Define/describe Phenomenon, domain of investigation, hypothesis, variables
2-4
2 Sample Describe and evaluate the sample 5
3 Data analysis Describe, explore, test data statistically
6-9
4 Discussion Are there patterns in the data, what explanations could be offered (tentatively)
10
5 Outlook What would you need to give a better answer in 4?
10
(6) Abbreviations 11
(7) References 11