Upload
badru
View
52
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Excess Electrons in W ater: Clusters, Interfaces, and the Bulk. Laszlo Turi Adam Madarasz (Eotvos Loring U., Budapest) Wen-Shyan Sheu (Fu-Jen University, Taipei) Daniel Borgis (Universite d’Evry / ENS Paris). Funding National Science Foundation R. A. Welch Foundation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
FundingFunding•National Science Foundation•R. A. Welch Foundation•Hungarian Science Foundation•Eötvös Fellowship•Bolyai János Fellowship•Széchenyi Professor Fellowship
Laszlo Turi Adam Madarasz(Eotvos Loring U., Budapest)
Wen-Shyan Sheu(Fu-Jen University, Taipei)
Daniel Borgis(Universite d’Evry / ENS Paris)
Excess Electrons in Water: Clusters, Interfaces, and the
Bulk
2
Water Cluster Anions: distinct “isomers”
Systematic variations
What are the characteristic properties which distinguish the different classes? Common sets of structural motifs?
Backing pressure/thermodynamic conditions. Non-equilibrium?
J. R. R. Verlet, A. E. Bragg, A. Kammrath, O. Cheshnovsky, and D. M. Neumark, Science, 307, 93 (2005).
3
Anionic clusters and hydrated electrons:localization mode/”binding motif” and
structure
↔
↔
“infinite” cluster
clusters
4
The Toolkit for Mixed Quantum-Classical MD Simulations
Components:
N classical water molecules (SPC model + internal flexibility)
the excess electron (wave function represented on dual [k,r] grid)
the electron-molecule interaction (pseudopotential*)
the force acting on the molecular nuclei:
= classical force (from the solvent) + quantum force (from the solute)
= FH2O + FQ
A sampling scheme: (adiabatic) time evolution of the system:
...)())(;())(;(ˆ)(12000
ttRQEtRQHtQOHnucl
RFFFR
{ quantum mechanical e- + classical solvent molecules }
* Turi, L.; Gaigeot, M.-P.; Levy, N.; Borgis, D.; J. Chem. Phys., 2001, 114, 7805. Turi, L.; Borgis, D. J. Chem. Phys., 2002, 117, 6186.
5
Applicability of the Pseudopotential
Bulk:
VDE for n=12 clusters
MP2/6-31(1+3+)G*
vs.
the pseudopotential
0 100 200 300 4000
100
200
300
400
500
600
VD
EM
P2/
me
V
VDEpseudo
/meV
Turi, L.; Madarász, Á.; Rossky, P. J.; JCP 125, 014308 (2006).
E0 = -3.12 eV
Es-p,max = 1.92 eV (vs. 1.72)
RG = <r2>1/2 = 2.4 A
6
Cluster Simulations: Surface states vs. internal states
L. Turi, W.-S. Sheu, P. J. Rossky, Science 309, 914 (2005), ibid. 310, 1719 (2005).
n = 20, 30, 45, 66, 104, 200 + 500, 1000
nominal T = 100K, 200K, 300K
(s p; n = 45. T = 200K)
7
E0,1
gap
expt. (M. Johnson + coworkers)
Average surface state energetic behavior vs. interior states and vs. expt.
old lines, new points: n = 200, 500, 1000(surface and internal at 200K)
(expt)
(expt)
300K bulk
- spectral gap
E0
internal
internal
n -1/3
0 0.1 0.30.2
300K bulk
n -1/3
~35D
0.20
8
Electron radius and kinetic energy
From: David M. Bartels - J. Chem. Phys. 115, 4404 (2001).
0 50 100 150 2000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Ekin
etic/e
V
n
0 50 100 150 200
1
2
3
4
5
Rg
,ele
ctro
n/Å
n
Simulations:
surface
surface
internal
internal
9
Hydrated electrons at water/vacuum interfaces:
the infinite cluster limit
Cases: Ambient water surface (300 K) Supercooled water surface (200 K) Hexagonal ice surface (200 K) Amorphous solid (quenched) water surface (100 K)
Starting point: charge-neutral equilibrium surfaces
Dynamic simulations of surface accommodation
and final states
Localization analysis
Á. Madarász, P. J. Rossky, L. Turi, JCP 126, 234707 (2007).
10
Interior and surface hydrated electrons at liquid water/vacuum interfaces
(meta)stable surface states at 200 K
vs. spontaneous internal states at 300 K
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
(zco
m,e -
zG
ibbs
) / Å
t / fs
z(t)
10 ps
11
Surface vs. Internal states
Internal state – bulk hydrated electron
Surface state – supercooled water interface
300 K Simulation temperature 200 K
2.4 Å Radius of the electron 2.7 Å
-3.1 eV Ground state energy -2.6 eV
1.9 eV Spectral maximum 1.5 eV
16 Coordination number (<5 Å) 10
12
partly reorganized -OH
Bulk Supercooled water interface
Amorphous solid water interface
ice Ih interface
Temperature 300 K 200 K 100 K 200 K
Electronradius
2.4 Å 2.7 Å 3.0 Å 2.6 Å
Ground state energy
-3.1 eV -2.6 eV -1.6 eV -2.7 eV
Spectral maximum
1.9 eV 1.5 eV ~1 eV 1.6 eV
Alternative surface states
partly reorganized from dangling -OH
fully reorganized -OH
restricted reorganization‘otherwise occupied’ -OH
13
(Credit: Mark Johnson)
1
23
4 1 AA 2 AD 3 DD 4 AD ice AADD
D A
A
D
Donor-Acceptor characterization of water molecules
strong electron binding
Concept: N. I. Hammer, J.-W. Shin, J. M. Headrick, E. G. Diken, J. R. Roscioli, G. H. Weddle, and M. A. Johnson, Science, 306, 675 (2004).
14
Hydrated electrons at solid water interfaces
1 2 3 4 5 60.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
fre
qu
en
cy c
ou
nt
r / Å
Structure II, T=100 K
Structure I, T=200 K
H-bonding structure analysis:
AA (solid) and AAD (dashed)
Ice Ih, 200K
ASW, 100K
AAD
AAD
AA
15
Equilibrium and non-equilibrium preparation of cluster anions
quenched clusters (QC)
Prepare warm (ambient) neutral equilibrium structures
→ quench them gradually to a sequence of lower T’s Cluster surface site analysis
metastable clusters (MC)
Alternative preparation protocol: assemble the neutral clusters at very low T → warm them up gradually to the desired higher T.
metastable clusters have never “seen” annealing temperatures
Add the electron and relax (for ~ 200 ps).