Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FY 2016 Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE (IHS) GPRA PERFORMANCE RESULTS
Introduction IHS clinical GPRA results are calculated from the Clinical Reporting System (CRS) Class 1 software module installed locally on the Resource and Patient Management System (RPMS), IHS’s electronic health record.
The CRS measure logic is located here
Each clinical measure has two graphs: ◦ the current national performance result and historical data
◦ IHS !rea graphs comparing the current reporting year to the previous year for each of IHS’s twelve !reaOffices.
Area Abbreviations Area
Alaska
Albuquerque
Bemidji
Billings
California
Great Plains
Nashville
Navajo
Oklahoma
Phoenix
Abbreviation
ALA
ALB
BEM
BIL
CAL
GPA
NAS
NAV
OKL
PHX
POR Portland
TUC Tucson
Acronym
NPIRS
AI/AN
A1c
BMI
BP
CHD
CVD
DV/IPV
GPRAMA
HP
LDL
Definition
National Patient Information Reporting System
American Indian/Alaska Native
Hemoglobin A1c
Body Mass Index
Blood Pressure
Coronary Heart Disease
Cardiovascular Disease
Domestic Violence/Intimate Partner Violence
Government Performance and Results Act Modernization Act
Healthy People
Low Density Lipoprotein
MH Million Hearts
Acronym Definitions
GPRA 2016 Results Summary Of the 24 measures that IHS/Tribal programs reported in FY 2016: ◦ 15 measures met their targets
10 measures exceeded FY 2015 results◦8 measures decreased from FY 2015 results◦4 measures were new for FY 2016 and had baseline targets◦2 measures had revised logic in FY 2016 and had baseline targets◦
Most (6 of 8) of the measures that decreased did not meet targets, however:
◦ Tobacco Cessation and Childhood Weight Control decreased from 2015 performance butstill met 2016 targets◦ Pneumococcal Vaccination, Mammography, and Controlling High Blood Pressure
(MH) exceeded 2015 results but did not meet 2016 targets
◦2 GPRAMA measures (Depression and CVD) improved and met targets while the other two(Good Glycemic and Childhood Immunizations) decreased and did not meet targets
FY 2016 IHS/Tribal Results Summary In FY 2016, 10 measures improved over FY 2015 performance
Measure FY 2015 Q4 FY 2016 Q4 % Improvement
CVD Comprehensive Assessment* 55.0% 65.7% 10.7%*
Controlled BP <140/90* 62.5% 68.3% 5.8%*
Dental Sealants 16.3% 18.1% 1.8%
Topical Fluorides 29.4% 31.1% 1.7%
Pneumococcal Vaccination 65+ 84.9% 86.4% 1.5%
Nephropathy Assessed 62.0% 63.3% 1.3%
Colorectal Cancer Screening 38.6% 39.6% 1.0%
Controlling High BP (MH) 58.5% 59.2% 0.7%
Depression Screening 67.4% 67.9% 0.5%
Mammography 54.5% 54.8% 0.3%
*measures with logic changes in FY 2016 but no baseline target
FY 2016 IHS/Tribal Results Summary
In FY 2016, 8 measures decreased compared to FY 2015 performance
Measure FY 2015 Q4 FY 2016 Q4 % Decrease
Retinopathy Exam* 61.3% 59.1% 2.2%*
Tobacco Cessation* 52.1% 50.4% 1.7%*
Childhood Immunizations 73.3% 72.3% 1.0%
Good Glycemic Control 47.4% 46.9% 0.5%
Dental Access 29.2% 28.7% 0.5%
Breastfeeding Rates 35.7% 35.2% 0.5%
Childhood Weight Control 21.8% 22.3% 0.5%
Cervical (Pap) Screening 54.9% 54.8% 0.1%
*measures with logic changes in FY 2016 but no baseline target
Diabetes: Good Glycemic Control AI/AN patients with diabetes who have maintained Good A1c control (<8) during the past
year.
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
CRS Diabetes Audit
32 31 32 31.9 33.2
48.3 48.6 47.4 46.9
39
36 36 37
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
*
*Prior to FY 2013, this measure tracked the percentage of patients with ideal glycemic control (HbA1c <7 ).
0
Diabetes: Good Glycemic Control 100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 59.8% 48.8% 46.2% 45.9% 51.1% 42.8% 42.7% 44.7% 57.9% 40.4% 49.7% 43.3%
FY15 60.5% 47.5% 40.6% 42.5% 50.3% 42.9% 41.8% 45.0% 58.7% 40.2% 49.7% 42.1%
N 2457 8704 4321 5665 4839 11997 5743 20104 17107 20629 5973 3139
Diabetes: Blood Pressure Control AI/AN patients with diabetes who have maintained BP control (<140/90) during the past year.
PER
CEN
T
CRS Diabetes Audit
100
80
60
40
20
0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
38 37 38 37.8 38.9
64.6 63.8 62.5
68.3
36 36
39 39
*
**
*Prior to FY 2013, this measure tracked the percentage of patients with BP <130/80. **Minor logic change in FY 2016 to include patients with only one BPrecorded during the report period.
Diabetes: Blood Pressure Control (<140/90)
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 69.2% 74.0% 67.3% 64.3% 69.3% 66.5% 63.0% 70.4% 67.8% 66.3% 70.8% 71.6%
FY15 64.7% 68.5% 51.1% 57.3% 63.0% 59.4% 58.0% 65.6% 63.7% 62.4% 63.1% 63.6%
N 2457 8704 4321 5665 4839 11997 5743 20104 17107 20629 5973 3139
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Diabetes: Statin Therapy to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease Risk
AI/AN patients with diabetes who are statin therapy users or receive a prescription for statin therapy during the report period.
2016
61.9
0
20
40
60
80
100
PER
CEN
T
*
*New measure in FY 2016. Replaced the Diabetes: LDL Assessed measure.
Diabetes: Statin Therapy to Prevent CVD Risk
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 67.5% 59.3% 67.3% 64.0% 52.8% 60.3% 64.9% 63.5% 64.0% 58.0% 62.4% 67.6%
FY15
N 1733 5800 2948 3928 3273 8097 3945 13927 12381 12972 4195 1861
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Diabetes: Nephropathy Assessment AI/AN patients with diabetes who have been assessed for nephropathy within the past
year.
PER
CEN
T
CRS Diabetes Audit
100
80
60
40
20
0
50 50
55 56.5
66.7 68.2
60.0 62 63.3
35 37
44
48
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
*
* New baseline set to reflect measure change requiring UACR in FY 2014.
Diabetes: Nephropathy Assessment
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 61.0% 73.1% 66.3% 65.6% 63.9% 66.6% 64.0% 58.7% 68.6% 55.3% 66.2% 64.1%
FY15 58.4% 70.8% 57.9% 61.5% 58.4% 62.0% 59.3% 60.0% 69.9% 54.2% 60.9% 58.8%
N 2457 8704 4321 5665 4839 11997 5743 20104 17107 20629 5973 3139
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Diabetes: Retinopathy AI/AN patients with diabetes who have been assessed for retinopathy within the past
year.
50 51 53 53.5
55.7 57.6
59.9 61.3
59.1
0
2015 2016
*Minor logic change in FY 2016 to exclude chart reviews and telephone calls from counting towards meeting the measure
20
40
60
80
100
PER
CEN
T
*
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Diabetes: Retinopathy
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 55.4% 72.1% 48.5% 60.9% 50.2% 46.2% 56.6% 62.8% 68.0% 56.2% 52.2% 64.5%
FY15 55.4% 75.0% 52.9% 58.1% 48.0% 53.5% 53.7% 64.0% 70.0% 57.9% 54.5% 61.5%
N 2447 8682 4315 5663 4832 11982 5735 20035 17082 20599 5968 3125
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Dental: General Access AI/AN patients who have received dental services within the past year.
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
25 25 25 26.9
28.8 28.3 28.8 29.2 28.7
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
HP 2020 Goal = 49.0%
0
Dental: General Access
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 32.0% 36.6% 34.9% 29.8% 42.7% 21.2% 38.6% 21.9% 27.6% 25.2% 33.9% 44.7%
FY15 31.4% 34.2% 33.1% 30.9% 41.5% 24.7% 38.4% 21.5% 29.8% 25.4% 35.1% 34.8%
N 55951 74462 42560 57059 65754 129303 39311 192953 169520 172256 73975 20217
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Dental: Sealants AI/AN children with intact dental sealants.
13.9 14.6 16.3
18.1
0
20
40
60
80
100 P
ER
CEN
T
*
2013 2014 2015 2016
*Prior to FY 2013, this measure tracked the number of intact sealants in AI/AN patients within the past year.
Dental: Sealants
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 23.7% 28.8% 17.2% 26.7% 19.2% 14.2% 25.3% 15.9% 11.3% 19.4% 16.6% 21.5%
FY15 22.1% 25.2% 14.1% 24.3% 18.3% 16.2% 25.2% 16.2% 8.6% 16.1% 17.0% 23.4%
n 14344 16396 11531 16387 17092 36662 9971 47510 42179 45211 17517 5180
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Dental: Topical Fluorides AI/AN children with at least one topical fluoride treatment within the past year.
26.7 27.9 29.4
31.1
0
20
40
60
80
100
PER
CEN
T
*
2013 2014 2015 2016
*Prior to FY 2013, this measure tracked the number of patients receiving one or more fluoride applications during the report period.
Dental: Topical Fluorides 100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 38.5% 49.9% 35.6% 41.1% 32.2% 23.7% 49.7% 26.6% 23.8% 27.9% 35.2% 38.4%
FY15 36.0% 47.6% 34.8% 39.8% 31.1% 27.3% 50.5% 26.3% 19.0% 26.0% 35.3% 37.7%
n 15322 17395 12320 17596 18054 39454 10570 50444 45023 48495 18547 5520
Immunizations: Influenza 6mo - 17yrs AI/AN patients (ages 6 months to 17 years) who have received the influenza vaccine
within the past year.
37.1
0
20
40
60
80
100
PER
CEN
T
HP 2020 Goal = 70.0%
*
2016
* New measure in FY 2016. One of two measures that replaced the Influenza 65+ measure.
Immunizations: Influenza 6mo – 17yr
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 27.8% 42.1% 29.5% 36.6% 23.2% 37.1% 33.5% 53.5% 30.7% 32.6% 37.3% 55.5%
FY15
N 15059 14515 9674 14393 14676 29366 9577 43940 37313 39247 15213 4675
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Immunizations: Influenza 18+ AI/AN patients (ages 18+) who have received the influenza vaccine within the past
year.
38.7
0
20
40
60
80
100 P
ER
CEN
T
HP 2020 Goal = 70.0%
*
2016
* New measure in FY 2016. One of two measures that replaced the Influenza 65+ measure.
Immunizations: Influenza 18+
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 27.7% 43.2% 32.3% 41.8% 27.5% 35.1% 35.4% 47.8% 39.0% 36.3% 38.9% 52.8%
FY15
N 29843 37181 19534 26286 30067 55374 20863 92898 84595 73672 36026 9353
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Immunizations: Pneumococcal AI/AN patients (age 65+) with pneumo vaccine after the age of 65 or a dose of pneumo
vaccine in the past five years.
TITLE
100
80
60
40
20
0
82 82 84
85.5 88.5 89.2
85.7 84.9 86.4
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
HP 2020 Goal = 90%
*
*New baseline in FY 2014 due to measure logic change
Immunization: Pneumococcal 65+
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 82.7% 92.1% 80.7% 85.6% 78.8% 83.4% 80.8% 91.8% 87.8% 82.9% 83.6% 90.0%
FY15 83.5% 92.0% 74.4% 84.0% 76.8% 81.4% 80.5% 91.0% 85.8% 81.8% 79.6% 89.7%
N 3522 4691 2326 2904 3603 5113 2609 14559 11087 7771 4238 1000
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Immunizations: Childhood (19-35 months) AI/AN patients (age 19-35 months) who have received the combined childhood
vaccination series (4:3:1:3*:3:1:4).
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
0
78 79 79 75.9 76.8
74.8 75.4 73.3 72.3
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
HP 2020 Goal = 80%
** ***
*
* 1 Varicella vaccine added to the series in FY 2010. **4 Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines were added to the series in FY 2011. ***In FY 2013, 3or 4 HiB vaccines were required depending on the brand.
Immunizations: Childhood (19-35 months)
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 81.1% 86.2% 63.7% 64.9% 59.0% 73.5% 64.7% 79.5% 76.4% 65.4% 64.1% 86.4%
FY15 73.8% 91.0% 67.1% 67.7% 59.2% 74.8% 62.7% 83.2% 75.7% 65.7% 64.6% 77.6%
N 1131 811 834 1193 1111 2338 675 3549 3055 3223 1009 338
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Cancer Screening: Cervical (Pap Screen) AI/AN women age 24-64 who have received a Pap screen
within the previous three years, or age 30-64 years with a Pap screen in the past three years or a Pap Screen and an HPV DNA in the past five years.
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
0
59 59 59 58.1 57.1
61.7
54.6 54.9 54.8
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
HP 2020 Goal = 93.0%
*
**
*Prior to FY 2013, this measure included women age 21-64 with a Pap screen in the previous three years. In FY 2013, the measure included women age 24-64 **As of FY 2014,this measure includes women 24-64 with a Pap Screen in the past 3 years or women 30 to 64 with a Pap screen and an HPV DNA in the past 5 years.
Cancer Screening: Cervical (Pap Screen)
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 65.2% 63.9% 49.1% 48.1% 48.8% 45.1% 57.8% 56.6% 64.2% 49.1% 49.3% 59.1%
FY15 64.3% 66.8% 47.6% 50.9% 46.4% 47.1% 56.5% 54.3% 62.2% 50.0% 49.0% 58.3%
N 11058 15214 7118 9847 11547 22096 7264 36041 30926 31662 13351 4053
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Cancer Screening: Breast (Mammography) AI/AN women (age 52-64) who have received mammography screening
within the previous two years.
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
45 45 48
49.8 51.9
53.8 54.2 54.5 54.8
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
HP 2020 Goal = 81.1%
0
Cancer Screening: Breast (Mammography)
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 63.0% 58.5% 55.7% 47.0% 47.7% 52.6% 60.0% 52.2% 71.3% 43.4% 46.5% 53.2%
FY15 63.6% 58.0% 48.7% 46.7% 46.0% 49.7% 54.7% 52.2% 68.2% 43.3% 46.1% 55.2%
N 3149 4173 2122 2791 3204 5393 2135 10641 9243 7897 4041 1019
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Cancer Screening: Colorectal
AI/AN patients ages 50-75 who have received appropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening.
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
0
29
33
37
41.7
46.1
35.0 37.5 38.6 39.6
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
HP 2020 Goal = 70.5%
*
*Prior to FY 2013, this measure tracked the percentage of patients ages 51 to 80 years of age who received appropriate colorectal cancer screening, whichincluded double contrast barium enema. Beginning in FY 2013, a double contrast barium enema no longer counts toward meeting the measure.
Cancer Screening: Colorectal
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 60.5% 41.9% 41.3% 34.6% 32.4% 32.7% 45.6% 36.8% 50.5% 28.1% 39.7% 35.0%
FY15 59.3% 39.7% 34.2% 34.3% 31.2% 27.5% 42.7% 34.6% 49.4% 26.7% 38.5% 33.9%
N 9342 11872 6678 8241 9482 15897 6759 32021 27897 21983 12010 2874
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Tobacco Cessation AI/AN tobacco-using patients who have received tobacco cessation intervention within
the past year or quit their tobacco use within the past year.
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
0
21 24 25
29.4
35.2
45.7 48.2
52.1 50.4
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
*
*Measure logic change in FY 2013 to include tobacco users in cessation
Tobacco Cessation
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 46.7% 64.3% 57.7% 51.4% 42.3% 49.5% 43.0% 39.1% 66.7% 39.0% 47.1% 26.8%
FY15 40.6% 64.8% 55.5% 57.0% 41.5% 48.4% 43.1% 43.1% 66.8% 44.7% 46.9% 17.9%
N 17366 8962 12740 15941 11040 34194 11449 17358 36726 21559 17051 2426
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Alcohol Screening: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) Prevention AI/AN women (age 14-46) who have been screened for
alcohol use within the past year.
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
47
52 55
57.8
63.8 65.7 66 66.6 67.2
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
*
*Prior to FY 2016, this measure tracked the percentage of AI/AN female patients ages 15-44 who received alcohol screening.
0
Alcohol Screening: FAS Prevention
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 73.1% 71.8% 59.8% 66.6% 60.8% 71.5% 78.9% 59.9% 76.3% 62.1% 59.8% 71.8%
FY15 74.6% 76.5% 55.5% 65.9% 57.2% 69.3% 76.8% 59.3% 72.0% 64.8% 58.5% 67.0%
N 11733 14561 7213 10432 12060 23983 7993 34375 33862 31981 13706 4053
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Domestic Violence/Intimate Partner Violence Screening: AI/AN women (age 14-46) who were screened for domestic violence /intimate partner violence
within the past year.
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
42
48
53 55.3
61.5 62.4 63.5 63.6 65.3
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
*
*Prior to FY 2016, this measure tracked the percentage of female patients ages 15-40 who had received DV/IPV Screening in thepast year.
0
DV/IPV Screening
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 71.0% 70.1% 58.0% 63.8% 62.9% 68.9% 76.4% 56.9% 75.8% 59.3% 56.1% 72.5%
FY15 69.9% 75.1% 53.9% 62.8% 58.6% 67.6% 69.6% 53.3% 70.2% 60.3% 56.3% 67.0%
N 11733 14561 7213 10432 12060 23983 7993 34375 33862 31981 13706 4053
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
35
44
52
56.5
61.9 65.1 66.0
67.4 67.9
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
0
Depression Screening
AI/AN patients ages 18 and older who have been screened for depression or diagnosed
with a mood disorder within the past year.
Depression Screening
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 70.0% 76.2% 63.0% 65.9% 65.5% 73.1% 75.0% 59.5% 77.3% 61.9% 61.1% 75.1%
FY15 68.3% 78.2% 58.7% 66.8% 61.3% 71.9% 70.8% 59.2% 73.9% 65.0% 60.5% 69.4%
N 29843 37181 19534 26286 30067 55374 20863 92898 84595 73672 36026 9353
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Childhood Weight Control (CWC) AI/AN children ages 2-5 years with a BMI at or above 95th percentile.
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
24 25 25 24.1 24 22.8 22.8 21.8 22.3
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
HP 2020 Goal = 9.4%
0
Childhood Weight Control 100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 27.7% 19.1% 31.3% 24.7% 21.2% 22.4% 22.0% 19.6% 15.4% 24.8% 26.5% 30.8%
FY15 28.9% 18.2% 29.5% 24.9% 21.7% 21.2% 23.6% 19.2% 16.0% 25.1% 26.0% 27.1%
n 2105 1935 1427 1755 1896 3994 1421 4831 4721 5212 1891 603
HIV Screening Ever AI/AN patients who have ever received screening for HIV.
41.9
0
20
40
60
80
100
PER
CEN
T
*
2016
*New measure for FY 2016
HIV Screening Ever
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 40.2% 46.4% 38.7% 42.1% 24.3% 42.3% 39.8% 51.2% 35.6% 44.0% 36.8% 62.0%
FY15
N 37944 53248 28411 37417 44812 86223 26666 129834 115892 117354 52212 13932
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
CVD Prevention: Comprehensive Assessment Active CHD patients ages 22 and older with a comprehensive assessment
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
30 32
35
39.8
45.4 46.7
52.3 55.0
65.7
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
*
**
*Prior to FY 2013, this measure tracked the percentage of active IHD patients ages 22 and older with a comprehensive assessment and included patients with an LDL
in the previous five years (beginning in FY 2013, LDL required during report period to meet measure).**LDL Assessment removed from the numerator definition in FY
2016.
0
Comprehensive CVD Assessment
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 55.7% 74.9% 66.6% 61.0% 63.4% 69.5% 75.6% 51.3% 75.5% 59.3% 59.2% 43.6%
FY15 38.9% 68.1% 49.3% 50.1% 47.0% 52.2% 54.2% 38.9% 69.2% 53.0% 44.0% 31.6%
N 1570 1587 1728 1866 1101 4596 2203 3748 6466 2992 1933 250
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Breastfeeding Rates AI/AN patients who, at the age of two months, were either exclusively or mostly
breastfed.
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
29.0
35.1 35.7 35.2
2013 2014 2015 2016
0
Breastfeeding Rates
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 53.0% 46.9% 27.3% 30.3% 46.9% 27.6% 37.6% 41.1% 33.0% 28.5% 44.7% 28.2%
FY15 51.7% 53.5% 25.2% 29.6% 60.8% 27.4% 33.3% 40.3% 31.5% 33.4% 39.3% 31.1%
N 185 224 194 178 162 590 109 1024 801 878 114 103
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Controlling High Blood Pressure (MH) AI/AN patients with diagnosed hypertension who have achieved blood pressure control
(<140/90).
PER
CEN
T
100
80
60
40
20
59.5 58.5 59.2
2014 2015 2016
0
Controlling High Blood Pressure (MH)
ALA ALB BEM BIL CAL GPA NAS NAV OKL PHX POR TUC
FY16 57.9% 64.9% 58.8% 52.0% 57.7% 57.8% 55.0% 60.8% 61.3% 56.5% 60.0% 62.9%
FY15 56.3% 62.3% 47.3% 51.0% 55.6% 56.2% 55.2% 60.7% 61.5% 58.5% 57.6% 63.0%
N 5899 8091 5276 5466 5998 14749 6502 20229 26895 18747 8271 2771
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2016 Final National Dashboard (IHS/Tribal)
DIABETES 2015 Target 2015 Final 2016 Target 2016 Final 2016 Final Results
Good Glycemic Control 47.7% 47.4% 49.5% 46.9% Not Met
Controlled BP <140/90 63.8% 62.5% 65.0% 68.3% Met
Statin Therapy to Reduce CVD Riskc N/A N/A Baseline 61.9% Met
Nephropathy Assessed 60.0% 62.0% 61.1% 63.3% Met
Retinopathy Exam 60.1% 61.3% 61.6% 59.1% Not Met
DENTAL
Dental: General Access 27.9% 29.2% 29.3% 28.7% Not Met
Sealants 14.1% 16.3% 14.8% 18.1% Met
Topical Fluoride 26.4% 29.4% 28.3% 31.1% Met
IMMUNIZATIONS
Influenza Vaccination 6mo - 17yrsc N/A N/A Baseline 37.1% Met
Influenza Vaccination 18+c N/A N/A Baseline 38.7% Met
Pneumococcal Vaccination 65+ 85.7% 84.9% 87.3% 86.4% Not Met
Childhood IZ 73.9% 73.3% 76.8% 72.3% Not Met
PREVENTION (Cervical) Pap Screening 54.6% 54.9% 55.6% 54.8% Not Met
Mammography Screening 54.8% 54.5% 55.9% 54.8% Not Met
Colorectal Cancer Screening 35.2% 38.6% 38.7% 39.6% Met
Tobacco Cessation 46.3% 52.1% 49.1% 50.4% Met
Alcohol Screening (FAS Prevention)a 66.7% 66.6% Baseline 67.2% Met
DV/IPV Screeninga 61.6% 63.6% Baseline 65.3% Met
Depression Screening 64.3% 67.4% 67.2% 67.9% Met
CVD- Comprehensive Assessmenta 47.3% 55.0% 53.3% 65.7% Met
HIV Screening Everc N/A N/A Baseline 41.9% Met
Childhood Weight Controlb N/A 21.8% 22.8% 22.3% Met
Breastfeeding Rates 29.0% 35.7% 35.8% 35.2% Not Met
Controlling High Blood Pressure (MH) 59.5% 58.5% 60.6% 59.2% Not Met
Public Health Nursing Encounters 425,679 377,913 390,556 Pending N/A
Suicide Surveillanced 1,419 2,346 1,798 Pending N/A (forms completed)
aMeasure logic changes in FY 2016 Measures Met: 15
bLong-term measure; reported in FY 2016 Measures Not Met: 9
cNew measure as of FY 2016
dMeasure data is submitted from 11 Areas
M easures in red are GPRAMA measures