Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Gaining Efficiencies in Contract Sewing Through LEAN Manufacturing Techniques
Bob RosaniaCEO
Ehmke Manufacturing CompanyOctober 15, 2018
AGENDA:
• Why Change? (One Company’s Perspective)
• LEAN Philosophy
• LEAN Tool Box
• LEAN Outcomes
Why Change? (One Company’s Perspective)
Ehmke – Your Textile Solutions ProviderSince 1929
From concept to finished product, Ehmke can help make your ideas become reality
Product Offerings:
1. Aircraft Products & Custom Interiors.
2.Tactical Systems (HIGH GROUND Tactical Gear)
3. Custom OEM & Military Sewn Products
4. Commercial Products
Pro
Sewn End-Products Since 1929
Current State (Yr. 2006):
• Top Down Management & Direction.• Batch Loading Production Lines.• Significant Work in Process (WIP).• Excess Inventory.• Piece Work Culture.• Tool Crib/Machine Warehouse/Clutter• Discreet Order Driven.
Future State (Yr. 2018):
• LEAN Culture – Production Cell Driven.• One-Piece Flow.• Significantly reduced WIP (Cart Reduction Program)• 50% Reduction in Inventory for 2X the amount of business.• Team Productivity Bonus.• 5S Approach.• Process Flow Driven.• Dramatic Improvement in Quality.
Implementing LEAN Tools = Improved Profitability
LEAN Philosophy
LEAN Philosophy“A systematic approach to identifying and Eliminating Waste (non-value-added
activities) through continuous improvement by flowing the product at the pull of the
customer in pursuit of perfection.”
The MEP Lean Network
“An organized war on waste.”
1. Know your TARGET: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wAjpMP5eyo
2. Consider new ways to perfection: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XmhBaUdges
Definition of Lean Thinking:
A systemic approach that maximizes customer value while minimizing non-value activities and frustration in pursuit of a vision / direction.
The term “LEAN" was coined to describe Toyota's
business during the late 1980s by a research team
headed by Jim Womack, Ph.D., at MIT's
International Motor Vehicle Program.
History of Lean Manufacturing
1920’s
Ford
1970’s
1920’s
Ford 1970’s
Toyota 1990’sLEAN
Manufacturing2000’s
LEANEnterprise
Lean = Eliminating the Wastes
Value Added
Typically 95% of all lead time is non-value added
• Transportation
• Inventory
• Motion
• People
• Waiting
• Overproduction
• Overprocessing
• Defects
Non-Value Added
Examples of Waste
▪ Redundant Inspection
▪ Multiple Systems (MRP)
▪ Excess Forms and Supplies
▪ Batch Loading
▪ Downtime (Computer Networks)
▪ Searching for Paperwork
▪ Waiting for Instruction
▪ Excessive Transactions
5 Guiding Principles of Lean / CI:
PERFECTION
PULL FLOW
VALUE
VALUE
STREAM
Characterize the Value
Stream (set of activities)
for each service /
process while removing
waste.
Progressive achievement
of value creating steps with
minimal queues and no
stoppages or backflows of
product, information or
services
A system in which
nothing is produced by a
supplier until the
customer signals a need
Always compete
against perfection
not just your
current competition
Define value as seen by your customer
LEAN Tool Box
• Kaizen Opportunity Form
• Current vs Future State Summary
• Value Stream Mapping Tool
• Spaghetti Diagrams / Process Flow
• SLEAT Analysis
• 5S Organization
Title: What are you talking about?
Background & Observation of problem
Current Conditions
Goals / Objectives
Analysis
Proposed Countermeasure(s)
Plan Implementation
Follow up & Replication
Describe the business problem
- Why are we talking about this? - What is the negative effect of the problem on the process outputs
Where do things stand today?
Utilize the concept of 5W and 1H to define the scope of the issue
What When
Where Who
Which How
-Describe what you are trying to accomplish. Use as many metrics as possible to define .
-What specific outcomes are we seeking?
What are the potential root cause(s) of the problem.
- Why are we experiencing the symptom?
- What constraints prevent us from the goal?
Choose the simplest problem-solving tool for this issue:
- Five whys
- Fishbone
Verify the root cause by being able to turn the problem on and off.
Your proposal to reach the future state, the target condition.
- What alternatives could be considered?
- How will you choose among the options? What decision criteria?
How your recommended countermeasures will impact the root cause to change the current situation and achieve the target.
What activities will be required for implementation and who will be responsible for what and when?.
A Gantt chart or facsimile that shows actions/outcomes, timeline and responsibilities. May include details on the specific means of implementation.
- Who will do what, when and how?
Indicators of performance, of progress.
- How will we know if the actions have the impact needed?
- What are the critical few, visual, most natural measures?
- Create process standards and institutionalize
Monitor performance and assure remaining issues that can be anticipated are addressed
- Any failure modes to watch out for? Any unintended consequences?
Ensure Replication in other areas
OwnerDate
19
LEAN Outcomes
EHMKE MFG COMPANY INC.
Government Order Shipping Process
Date of Event: May 15, 2016
Project Champion: XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXX
Focus: To improve the order process, eliminate errors, reduce process time
Value Add Time Non-Value Time
Future State Summary Future State Future State
Process Time 6.25 Hrs 0
Transportation 0 390 Ft
Waiting 0 4.0 Hrs
Over Process 0 0 Min.
Waste Identified: Current Future
Transportation: Order traveles around the Plant as a 12 Step process through 4 Departments. 1644 Feet 390 Feet
Inventory: Current Process takes almost 21 hours (over (2) 10 hour days) 20 Hr. 55 Min. 10 Hr. 15 Min.
Motion: Departments handle the same order multiple times. Production (3), Shipping (3), Quality (4). 12 Steps 4 Steps
People: Same people handle the order multiple times.
Waiting: Order waits to be processed at each step. 14.16 Hrs 4 Hrs
Over Processing: Same people review the order at different steps. 30 Min. 0 Min
Over Production: Reviewing documents to extract the same information at different steps in the process.
Defects: Processing the same information multiple times at different steps increases the chance of an error. 1 Error / Order 0 Errors
AutoDWG copy drawing's einties to clipboard, www.autodwg.com
Spaghetti Diagram – Raw Data
LEAN TOOL BOX
LEAN Outcomes
Spaghetti Diagram – Ehmke Plant Layout – Current State (2006)
Plant LEAN Flow: Opportunities And Challenges
• Shipping and Receiving all materials at one docking point
• Scattered raw material inventory points
• Multiple Upstream processing cells
• Obsolete materials occupying rack space
• Open floor plan – able to see whole plant from front to back
Spaghetti Diagrams - Ehmke Plant Layout – Future State (2007)
SLEAT EVALUATION (Annually) 2006: 1.8 out of 5.02010: 3.8 out of 5.0
Ehmke Manufacturing Co., Inc.
April 6th, 2006
0
1
2
3
4
5
1.1 Company vision
1.2 Vision Deployment
1.3 Setting Goals
1.4 Lean Plan
1.5 Communication
1.6 Workforce Attitude
1.7 Working Environment
2.1 Value Stream Analysis
2.2 Factory Organization
2.3 Supplier Management
2.4 Product Flow
2.5 All Reasonable Physical
2.6 Communication of Production
2.7 Shop Floor Control
2.8 Inventory Control3.1 CPI Project 3.2 CPI Training
3.3 Data Availab
3.4 5S’s Implementation
4.1 Manufacturing Teams
4.2 Empowerment
4.3 Multi-Skilled Labor
4.4 Training
5.1 Standard Work
5.2 Total Productive Maintenance
5.3 Variation Management System
5.4 Facilities
6.1 Cross Functional Teams
6.2 Producibility
6.3 Design to Cost
6.4 Performance Measures
Ehmke Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Ehmke Evaluation May 03, 2010
0
1
2
3
4
5
1.1 Company vision
1.2 Vision Deployment
1.3 Setting Goals
1.4 Lean Plan
1.5 Communication
1.6 Workforce Attitude
1.7 Working Environment
2.1 Value Stream Analysis
2.2 Factory Organization
2.3 Supplier Management
2.4 Product Flow
2.5 All Reasonable Physical
2.6 Communication of Production
2.7 Shop Floor Control
2.8 Inventory Control
3.1 CPI Project
3.2 CPI Training
3.3 Data Availab
3.4 5S’s Implementation
4.1 Manufacturing Teams
4.2 Empowerment
4.3 Multi-Skilled Labor
4.4 Training
5.1 Standard Work
5.2 Total Productive Maintenance
5.4 Facilities
5S Organization Audit
1. SORT
2. Straighten
3. Shine
4. Standardize
5. Sustain
6. Safety
5S AUDIT CHECKLIST
Date
SortWhat is need and not needed for production.
1 poor
2fair
3good
4verygood
5 excellent
Tools, materials, equipment NOT required for current job
No obstructions in aisle ways. Comments
Raw Materials, WIP, and Finished Goods are NOT to
be considered as part of this criteria.
StraightenA place for everything and everything in its place
1 poor
2fair
3good
4verygood
5 excellent
Material and machine locations are designated.
Materials and machines are in(side) proper locations. Comments
Also includes: sample(s), templates, and communication boards
Carts, ladders, and samples can be returned at the end of the shift.
ShineClear and clean work surfaces and area
1 poor
2fair
3good
4verygood
5 excellent
Machines are free of grease or material buildup.
Work surfaces are free of any substances that might damage product Comments
or machinery.
Daily debris from normal production should be cleaned at the end
of the shift and not counted against this criteria.
StandardizePlant wide use of common practices
1 poor
2fair
3good
4verygood
5 excellent
Markings, colors, and designations are the same in production areas
to material storage racks to maintenance areas. Comments
Within a certain area - a particular practice must be used for all
common resources (i.e. same numbering system on machines,
identificationn of raw material boxes)
SustainMaintain & improve Sort, Shine, Straighten, Standardize
1 poor
2fair
3good
4verygood
5 excellent
Area clean up at end of shift (minimum) or more frequently.
Communication board being utilized to raise questions, comments, or Comments
clarification of a new piece of equipment or best practice.
Compare last two audits' observations - have these been addressed
and/or did they occur again?
Score
5S – SORT, STRAIGHTEN, SHINE, STANDARDIZE, SUSTAIN (and SAFETY)
5S – SORT, STRAIGHTEN, SHINE, STANDARDIZE, SUSTAIN (and SAFETY)
LEAN Outcomes (Since 2006)• Improved Productivity
• Yr. 2007 to Yr 2008• 48% Increase in Top Line Revenue• 110% Increase in EBITA• Net 2 FTE added
• One-Piece Flow instead of Batch Loading• Significant reduction in Work-in-Process (WIP)• Reduction in Inventory / Increase in Inventory Turns/ Point-of Use Inventory• Improved Quality
• Customer - Global Aerospace Company• Deliver approximately 10,000 Contract Line Items (CLINs) Annually• 1st Time Quality Rating: 99.82%• On-Time Delivery Rating: 99.71%• Global Performance Excellent Award 5 out of 11 years• Global Supplier of the Year (selected from 14,000 global suppliers)
• Employee Retention - Productivity “LEAN Line” Bonus (Simple, Visual, Employee Involvement)• Production Cell Bonus vs Piece Work
• Corporate Culture Gains (Trust, Transparency, Scope & Sequence)
• Sales & Marketing Tool
Resources• Books:
• LEAN Thinking – James P. Womack (1996)• Toyota KATA – Mike Rother (2009)• LEAN Turnaround – Art Bryce (2012)• How to Implement LEAN Manufacturing – Lonnie Wilson (2009)
• YOU – Executive / Management sets the vision, but the Shop Floor makes it successful!• Willingness to learn• Willingness to adapt (Philly Special)• Willingness to improve
• LEAN/Six Sigma Training: IASSC• Website: https://www.iassc.org
• Manufacturing Extension Partnership / NIST• Fifty-One (51) Industrial Resource Centers nationwide to assist SMEs• Website: https://www.nist.gov/mep/mep-national-network
• Philadelphia area Delaware Valley Industrial Resource Center (DVIRC) is the national leader in providing LEAN Training to SMEs (Website: www.dvirc.org)
Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Industrial Resource Centers
THANK YOU
Ehmke Manufacturing Company, Inc.
4200 Macalester Street
Philadelphia, PA. 19124
Ph: (215) 324-4200
E-Mail: [email protected]
Visit our Website @ www.ehmkemfg.com