Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    1/29

    CORPORATIONCORPORATION

    GeorgeKingGeorgeKing .

    ove r 38 y ears o f exper ience . He s ta r t ed h is ca reer w i thAm oco in 19 71 . H is t echn ical backg rou nd in c ludes

    energ ized f rac tu r in g , acid iz ing , com p lex fo rm at ion

    .over 38 y ears o f exper ience . He s ta r t ed h is ca reer w i thAm oco in 19 71 . H is t echn ical backg rou nd in c ludes

    energ ized f rac tu r in g , acid iz ing , com p lex fo rm at ion.

    George has w r i t t en over 60 t echn ical papers , a book oncom p le t ion s and w ork overs , w as a 1985 SPE d is t ing u ishedlectu r e r and ad jun c t p r o fessor a t t he Un iver s i t y o f Tu l sa

    .

    George has w r i t t en over 60 t echn ical papers , a book oncom p le t ion s and w ork overs , w as a 1985 SPE d is t ing u ishedlectu r e r and ad jun c t p r o fessor a t t he Un iver s i t y o f Tu l sa

    am o ng s m a ny on or s t r ou g ou t s car eer .

    George i s cu r r en t l y a consu l t an t w i th Apache in t he a rea o fst i m u l at i o n a n d w o r k o v e r s.

    am o ng s m a ny on or s t r ou g ou t s car eer .

    George i s cu r r en t l y a consu l t an t w i th Apache in t he a rea o fst i m u l at i o n a n d w o r k o v e r s.

    2009 EPT Plan Presentation.ppt 02/16/2009 1

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    2/29

    ShaleGasFracturing CombiningTracersandShaleGasFracturing CombiningTracersandMicroseismic to

    Optimize

    Fracture

    NetworksMicroseismic to

    Optimize

    Fracture

    Networks

    GeorgeE.KingCompletionsConsultantGeorgeE.KingCompletionsConsultant

    Based on SPE Paper 119,896 and other well data

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    3/29

    Areyourfracturesoptimized?Areyourfracturesoptimized? Can IP be tied to EUR? Onl if frac network sta s o en! Can IP be tied to EUR? Onl if frac network sta s o en!

    Decline of 25% in 20 days in well w/ low rate frac (controlled frac h) - did notgenerate much frac network ?

    Decline of 25% in 20 days in well w/ low rate frac (controlled frac h) - did notgenerate much frac network ?

    w w ,

    network , but didnt prop it had higher IP, but suffered faster decline andhigh water production!

    w w ,

    network , but didnt prop it had higher IP, but suffered faster decline andhigh water production!

    , ,ramp for breakdown and faster sand ramp. Had flatter declines w/ low water.

    , ,ramp for breakdown and faster sand ramp. Had flatter declines w/ low water.

    Early High Rate Frac (70 bpm),500 bwpd Produced Water

    one year ec ne o80%! WHY?

    The feeder fractures

    High ratefrac w/ hcontrol

    .

    Low Rate Frac (35 bpm),30 bwpd Produced Water

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    4/29

    SomeObservationsFrom200+BarnettFracStagesSomeObservationsFrom200+BarnettFracStages Tensile fracs & open natural fracs are easiest to extend. Can go out

    of zone in slower fluid ramp, faster sand ramp, buildbarriers.

    - .

    - Mixtures of sand 100 mesh + 40/70 or 20/40 used to plug runaways.

    - Rate of press increase of 1 to 8 psi/min is good, faster press increase

    .

    - Mixtures of sand 100 mesh + 40/70 or 20/40 used to plug runaways.

    - Rate of press increase of 1 to 8 psi/min is good, faster press increasemay signal impending screenout . Press drop may signal out-of-zone

    frac growth.

    may signal impending screenout . Press drop may signal out-of-zone

    frac growth.

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    5/29

    WellPerformancevs.FlowRegimefor

    FWB

    Barnett

    Wells

    WellPerformancevs.FlowRegimefor

    FWB

    Barnett

    Wells Stress Anisotropy

    An optimum frac should An optimum frac should6,000

    NaturalFracture

    Shear FracturesPresent Worth

    it to maximize NPV andEUR.it to maximize NPV andEUR. 4,000

    ,

    d)

    Drainage

    Only?

    The performance of most

    fracs in the Barnett are

    The performance of most

    fracs in the Barnett are

    3,000

    ate

    (mcf

    ,still needed.

    ,still needed.

    1,000

    ,

    WellIP

    ProppedFracture

    frac performanceproblem that could showfrac performanceproblem that could show

    0

    0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0

    Well EUR (BCF)

    Drainage ONLY

    Stress Anisotropy

    EUR?

    EUR?

    Shear FracturesPresent Worth

    Plot by Jim Shuss

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    6/29

    FracNetworkingwithFractureHeightControlFracNetworkingwithFractureHeightControl OK what is happening? OK what is happening?

    - Natural fractures are being opened, but not effectivelypropped.- Natural fractures are being opened, but not effectivelypropped.

    - a ura racs c os ng as reservo r pressure ec nes anwater is recovered.

    -

    - a ura racs c os ng as reservo r pressure ec nes anwater is recovered.

    -

    - Can frac closure be controlled?

    -

    - Can frac closure be controlled?

    -

    Formation stresses, pressures, saturations and shale fabricdominates.

    Formation stresses, pressures, saturations and shale fabricdominates.

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    7/29

    AflowbackpatternfromonewellAflowbackpatternfromonewell

    Lift

    Days of Flow

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    8/29

    MoreTypical Asthewaterdrops,sodoesthegasMoreTypical Asthewaterdrops,sodoesthegas

    Days

    of

    Flow CourtesyRimrock Energy

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    9/29

    Whatmakesadifferenceinthewells?Whatmakesadifferenceinthewells? Classic shale gas candidate criteria

    Where are the flow paths located?

    Classic shale gas candidate criteria

    Where are the flow paths located?

    What factors affect well placement and design?

    What factors affect well placement and design?

    The way we operate the wells?

    The way we operate the wells?

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    10/29

    RoughComparisonsofGasShales

    Pay Barnett Marcellus Fayetteville Woodford Conasauga Devonian Antrim N Albany Lewis

    Basin FW Appalachia Arkoma Arkoma BWB App Michigan Illinois San Juan

    Location TX PA, WVA AR OK Ala, GA KY, NY, PA,WV

    MI, IN, OH IN, KY CO, NM

    Depth (ft) 6 to9000+

    4 -10,000 1500 to 6000 6 to 12,000 4 to 8,000 2 to 8000+ 0.6 to 2K+ 0.5 to 2K+ 3 to 6000

    H, thick:gross/net

    250: 50% 50 to 300 50-550: 50% 200 to 350 3000:? 30 to 300: 40% 160: 40 -60

    180: 40 to60

    3000:?

    Modulus, psi 7 to 9MM 4 to 7MM 3MM 3 to 5MM

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    11/29

    . ,value than pore gas NPV dominates.

    2 M v m n f hr h h h l m rix l flesser importance its just too slow!

    3. Recoverin the stored as in accessible naturalfractures is the major current value.

    Graphics source: Ron McDonald, Schlumberger

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    12/29

    CORPORATIONCORPORATIONNaturalFractures PrimaryandSecondaryNaturalFractures PrimaryandSecondaryShaleoutcrop in

    .

    Note theprimary

    secondary(yellow)naturalfractures. Athirdnatural frac

    set can beseen at thebottom of

    2009 EPT Plan Presentation.ppt 02/16/2009 12Gary Lash SUNY, AAPG

    e p c ure.

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    13/29

    Whatarewetryingtodo?Whatarewetryingtodo?1. Possibilities in each part of the formation barriers,

    faults, local variances. Take advantage.1. Possibilities in each part of the formation barriers,

    faults, local variances. Take advantage.

    . .

    3. Increase frac path width (complex frac)

    . .

    3. Increase frac path width (complex frac)

    5. Understand the treating pressure signature.

    6. Understand how to use the treatment variables:

    5. Understand the treating pressure signature.

    6. Understand how to use the treatment variables: Where do you place the perfs?

    Acid, ball sealers, hydraulic diversion

    Where do you place the perfs?

    Acid, ball sealers, hydraulic diversion

    a , s urry vo umes an ramp-up spee Sand & liquid volumes what is needed and usable?

    Rate both stable rate and corrective rate changes

    a , s urry vo umes an ramp-up spee Sand & liquid volumes what is needed and usable?

    Rate both stable rate and corrective rate changes

    When and when not to push for isolation When and when not to push for isolation

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    14/29

    SettingupfracstagesandperfsSettingupfracstagesandperfs How to divide the wellbore?

    - If natural fractures are regular, a regular spacing is OK.

    How to divide the wellbore?

    - If natural fractures are regular, a regular spacing is OK.

    - If not, find where the nat. fracs are.

    Methods of findin natural fracs assumin that is ood- If not, find where the nat. fracs are.

    Methods of findin natural fracs assumin that is ood

    - ROP and gas-shows from logs

    - Ratios of methane-to-ethane resence of C3 and C4 as

    - ROP and gas-shows from logs

    - Ratios of methane-to-ethane resence of C3 and C4 as

    - 3D seismic interpretation yes, it may indicate nat. fracs.

    -

    - 3D seismic interpretation yes, it may indicate nat. fracs.

    -

    - Tracers both tagged sand and water markers

    -

    - Tracers both tagged sand and water markers

    -

    Overlay all your data and look for patterns.

    Overlay all your data and look for patterns.

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    15/29

    SomeWellDesignFactorsSomeWellDesignFactors Wellbore orientation relative to frac direction(s)? Wellbore orientation relative to frac direction(s)?

    oes ma e a erence

    Do you really want the wellbore at 90

    oes ma e a erence

    Do you really want the wellbore at 90degrees to the frac?degrees to the frac?

    Primary

    Frac

    Secondary

    Direction

    NaturalFracs

    Wellbore

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    16/29

    CORPORATIONCORPORATION

    Microseismic capturedfromsequentialfracturedwells.Microseismic capturedfromsequentialfracturedwells.Notewellboreat a sli htangle toprimaryfracturedirectionkeeps

    secondaryrac rom

    followingwellbore.

    2009 EPT Plan Presentation.ppt 02/16/2009 16

    ource mrocEnergy SPE

    119896

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    17/29

    WellDesign Vertical,SlantorWellDesign Vertical,SlantorHorizontal offers maximum contact but slant wells

    ,

    several fracs and can fit on smaller leases.

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    18/29

    CORPORATIONCORPORATION

    vertical for themost part, butma follow the

    wellbore for ashort distance indeviated wells.

    Fractureorientation isaffected btectonic stressesin the rock.

    2009 EPT Plan Presentation.ppt 02/16/2009 18 DHVI?

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    19/29

    Tracer tagged sands are used periodicallyto analyze proppant breakdown points and

    near well communications.

    Tracer tagged pad & frac waters determine: which intervals are broken down in each ?

    which intervals are flowing back first;

    whichstayopencomparedtoprodlog.

    12001400

    Stage 1

    Candidate?

    0200400600800

    65 5 0 0

    Stage 2

    Stage 3

    Stage 4

    Stage 5

    Stage 6LevelofUse?

    1 4 69

    98

    125

    148

    1720

    1935

    2115

    2295

    2470

    2620

    3145

    3490

    3755

    not

    given

    notgiven

    Stage 7

    Stage 8

    Untilyouunderstand.

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    20/29

    What does micro-seismic reallytell you?What does micro-seismic reallytell you?

    General location of sounds in/near the pay that are General location of sounds in/near the pay that area ove a certa n energy t e gate eve .

    High and low energy events and high and low

    a ove a certa n energy t e gate eve .

    High and low energy events and high and low

    A decent view of fracture extension, fracture

    direction, fracture isolation, upper and lower frac

    A decent view of fracture extension, fracture

    direction, fracture isolation, upper and lower fracpenetration, and fracture flow path development.

    In some cases, it can tell you the effect of near-field-

    penetration, and fracture flow path development.

    In some cases, it can tell you the effect of near-field- , .

    And many sounds totally unconnected with a frac.

    , .

    And many sounds totally unconnected with a frac.

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    21/29

    WhatisavailablefromMicroseismic?WhatisavailablefromMicroseismic?Complexity, Frac Height, Direction, Length, Faults

    Correlation to Treating Events (pressure, rate, proppant loading)

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    22/29

    CORPORATIONCORPORATIONMoreComplexity LimitedDownwardGrowthMoreComplexity LimitedDownwardGrowth

    2009 EPT Plan Presentation.ppt 02/16/2009 22CourtesyRimrockEnergy

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    23/29

    CORPORATIONCORPORATION

    Thefrachadstayedinzoneuntilthis

    point first

    25%

    of

    events

    and

    the

    chart

    recordsaveryslow,steadypressurerise.

    Thenpressurestartstodecreaseassand

    concentrationisincreased..

    2009 EPT Plan Presentation.ppt 02/16/2009 23

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    24/29

    CORPORATIONCORPORATION

    FracturegoesintotheEllenberger. This

    correspondswith

    a

    drop

    in

    rate

    and

    a

    rapidjumpbacktofullrate.

    2009 EPT Plan Presentation.ppt 02/16/2009 24

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    25/29

    CORPORATIONCORPORATION

    Pressurestartstoclimbandfracture

    goesup

    and

    spreads

    2009 EPT Plan Presentation.ppt 02/16/2009 25

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    26/29

    Microseismic verticalaccuracyMicroseismic verticalaccuracy Is MS accurate enough to depend on it? It can be. Is MS accurate enough to depend on it? It can be.The comparison wells are mile apart.

    monitored from the

    vertical section of anoffset producing well.

    20% of events below pay.

    Well produced 500 bwpd

    of 100,000 ppm water.

    Left and Right: a frac

    unfractured wellbore.

    2% of events below pay.

    e pro uce wpof 35,000 ppm water.

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    27/29

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    28/29

    OperationsOperations

    How fast do you recover the water?

    How hard do you pull the pressure down on the well?

    How fast do you recover the water?

    How hard do you pull the pressure down on the well?

    When do you use lift? What type?

    When do you use lift? What type?

  • 7/31/2019 Gas Shale Fracture Optimization by Microseismic and Tracers

    29/29

    ConclusionsConclusions

    Spend the money early to understand the reservoir.

    Place the wells to maximize the access to flow paths

    Spend the money early to understand the reservoir.

    Place the wells to maximize the access to flow pathswithin the reservoir

    Monitor fracs cheapest way to improve fracs quickly.

    within the reservoir

    Monitor fracs cheapest way to improve fracs quickly.

    - Cost of the science is about 10% of well cost.

    - Frac optimization should take about 3 wells with science $

    - Cost of the science is about 10% of well cost.

    - Frac optimization should take about 3 wells with science $

    - Frac optimization has taken 10 wells w/o science $

    - The difference in production between optimized and

    - Frac optimization has taken 10 wells w/o science $

    - The difference in production between optimized and

    unoptimized fracs is about 30 to 50%.unoptimized fracs is about 30 to 50%.