10
GATEWAY CITIES STRATEGIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND NEXUS WITH MOBILITY MATRIX Executive Summary Prepared for: Prepared by: Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 445 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 March 2015

GATEWAY CITIES STRATEGIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN …libraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/2015-sub...445 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 March 2015 . Gateway Cities

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • GATEWAY CITIES STRATEGIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND NEXUS WITH MOBILITY MATRIX

    Executive Summary

    Prepared for:

    Prepared by: Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

    445 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3100 Los Angeles, CA 90071

    March 2015

  • Gateway Cities STP Overview

    Executive Summary

    S T R A T E G I C T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N O V E R V I E W – G A T E W A Y C I T I E S March 2015 Page ES-1

    Overview InFebruary2014,theLosAngelesCountyMetropolitanTransportationAuthority Metro Boardapprovedtheholistic,countywideapproachforpreparingMobilityMatricesforCentralLosAngeles,theLasVirgenes/MalibuCouncilofGovernments LVMCOG ,NorthCountyTransportationCoalition NCTC ,SanFernandoValleyCouncilofGovernments SFVCOG ,SanGabrielValleyCouncilofGovernments SGVCOG ,SouthBayCitiesCouncilofGovernments SBCCOG andWestsideCitiesCouncilofGovernments WCCOG seeFigureES‐1 .InlieuofaMobilityMatrix,theGatewayCitiesCouncilofGovernments GCCOG isdevelopingitsownStrategicTransportationPlan STP .ThisdocumentprovidesanoverviewoftheSTPeffortanditsrelationshiptotheparallelMobilityMatrixprojectsandforthcomingMetroLongRangeTransportationPlan LRTP update.

    ForthepurposesoftheMobilityMatrix,citieswithmembershipintwosubregionsselectedonesubregioninwhichtoparticipate.TheArroyoVerdugosubregiondecidedtoincludethecitiesofLaCañadaFlintridge,Pasadena,andSouthPasadenaintheSGVCOG,andBurbankandGlendaleintheSFVCOG.TheCityofSantaClaritaoptedtobeincludedintheSFVCOGinsteadoftheNCTC.TheCityofIndustrydecidedtobeincludedintheSanGabrielValleyratherthantheGatewayCities.WhiletheCityofIndustry’sprojectsareincludedintheSGVCOG’smobilitymatrix,projectsofsubregionalimportancelocatedintheCityofIndustryarealsoincludedintheSTP.

    BoundariesbetweentheWCCOGandCentralLosAngeles,andtheWCCOGandSBCCOG,weremodifiedbasedonMetroBoarddirectioninJanuary2015.

    InJanuary2015,theMetroBoardcreatedtheRegionalFacilitiescategory.RegionalFacilitiesincludeprojectsandprogramsrelatedtoLosAngelesCounty’sfourcommercialairports LosAngelesInternationalAirport,BurbankBobHopeAirport,LongBeachAirport,andPalmdaleRegionalAirport ,thetwoseaports PortofLosAngelesandPortofLongBeach ,andUnionStation.Theprojects/programsrelatedtoRegionalFacilitieshaveeitherbeenremovedfromthesubregionalMobilityMatricesoraRegionalFacilitiescategorycreatedattherequestofthesubregion.

    TheSTPincludesanalysisofallprojectcategoriesthatareinclusiveoftheGCCOGboundaries,includingtherelevantRegionalFacilitiesandprojectswithintheCityofIndustry.However,anyduplicativeprojectswillbereconciledthroughtheLRTPprocess,scheduledforadoptionin2017.

    Project Purpose TheSTPandtheGCCOG’sMobilityMatrix,areessentiallyoneinthesame,withtheSTPofferingasignificantlymorerobustanalysisthatquantifiesthebenefitsofsubregionallysignificantmulti‐modalregionallinkages.TheGCCOG’scontributiontotheMobilityMatrixincludesallprojectsidentifiedandincludedintheSTP,andadditionalprojectsprovidedbyGCCOGjurisdictionsforinclusionintheLRTPupdateprocess.

  • Gateway Cities STP Overview

    Executive Summary

    S T R A T E G I C T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N O V E R V I E W – G A T E W A Y C I T I E S March 2015 Page ES-2

    TheGatewayCitiesSTP,alongwithconcurrentMobilityMatrixeffortsinotherMetrosubregions,includesthedevelopmentofsubregionalgoalsandobjectivestoguidefuturetransportationinvestments,anassessmentofbaselinetransportationsystemconditionstoidentifycriticalneedsanddeficiencies,andaninitiallistofprojectsandprogramsintendedtoaddresssubregional

    objectives.FortheGatewayCitiessubregion,theongoingGatewayCitiesSTPefforthasprovidedtheevaluationanddocumentationinformationnecessarytorepresentthesubregioninMetro’sforthcomingLRTPupdate.TheSTPremainsunderdevelopment,withanexpecteddeliverydateofDecember2015.

    Figure ES-1. Los Angeles County Mobility Matrix Subregions

  • Gateway Cities STP Overview

    Executive Summary

    S T R A T E G I C T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N O V E R V I E W – G A T E W A Y C I T I E S March 2015 Page ES-3

    ThepurposeoftheGatewayCitiesSTPistodevelopandimplementaunifiedinter‐jurisdictionaltransportationimprovementstrategythatensureseffectivemanagementandconsensusaimedatmeetingsubregionaltransportationgoalsandobjectives.TheSTPisstructuredaroundfourkeyelements:

    Avisionforachievingfuturemultimodaltransportationgoalsinthesubregion.TheSTPlaysoutastrategicvisionforthefutureofmultimodaltravelintheGatewayCities,includingoutliningasetofstrategictransportationgoalsandobjectivesthatcumulativelybenefitmembercitiesandregionalstakeholders.

    Aprogramofprojectsandinitiativestoachievethesegoals.TheSTPinvolvesthedevelopmentandanalysisofanintegratedprogramofprojectsandinitiativesthataddressdeficienciesinthesubregionalfreeway,arterial,transit,park‐and‐ride,activetransportation,goodsmovement,ITS/technology includingazero‐emissiontruckcorridor andstormwatermanagementsystems.

    Thedevelopmentofnewstateoftheartanalyticalmodelstoevaluateprogramperformance.Anewthree‐tiermodelsystemallowsforanalysisofmacroregional ,meso sub‐regional ,andmicro corridor‐level analysisoftheimpactsoftheSTPprogramelements.Thisnewmodelframeworkallowsfortheevaluationofdozensofnewperformancemeasures.Inaddition,anupdatedairqualitymodelallowsforevaluationofairqualityimpacts.

    Aroadmapforimplementationoftheprogram.Thisincludesafundingandfinancingplan,geometricdesignsforselectpriorityprojects,azero‐emissiontruckcommercializationstudy,andalivingmodelthatcanbeusedtopursuefundingandimplementationoftheSTPvision.

    ToreviewandapproveelementsoftheSTP,theGCCOGhasestablishedanSTPTechnicalAdvisoryCommitteeTAC ,consistingofmembercitypublicworksofficials,andrepresentativesofmunicipaltransitagencies,andwaterqualityrepresentatives.InadditiontotheSTPTAC,theprocesshasinvolvedthereviewofamultitudeofpriorstudiesandprojectsandextensiveconsultationandcollaborationdirectlywithcitystaff,subregionalagencies,andprivatesectorentities.ThisfrequentstakeholderinputhasleddirectlytorefinementandimprovementoftheSTPprogram,andwillcontinuethroughtheproposedadoptionoftheSTP,anticipatedinlate2015.

    Subregional Overview TheGCCOGisaCaliforniaJointPowersAuthoritythatrepresentsthegovernmentsof28jurisdictionslocatedinthesubregion.ItsmembersarethecitiesofArtesia,Avalon,Bell,Bellflower,BellGardens,Cerritos,Commerce,Compton,Cudahy,Downey,HawaiianGardens,HuntingtonPark,Industry,LaMirada,Lakewood,LongBeach,Lynwood,Maywood,Montebello,Norwalk,Paramount,PicoRivera,SantaFeSprings,SignalHill,SouthGate,Vernon,Whittier,andunincorporatedareasofLosAngelesCounty.TheGCCOG’smissionistoprovidemembergovernmentswithaunifiedvoicetoactcollaborativelyandadvocateto

  • Gateway Cities STP Overview

    Executive Summary

    S T R A T E G I C T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N O V E R V I E W – G A T E W A Y C I T I E S March 2015 Page ES-4

    improveissuesrelatedtotransportation,airquality,housing,andeconomicdevelopment.

    BasedondatafromtheMetro2014ShortRangeTransportationPlan SRTP TravelDemandModel,theGatewayCitiesTransitAssessment,CaltransTrafficAccidentSurveillanceandAnalysisSystem,andanalysesperformedfortheGatewayCitiesSTP;keyfindingsregardingtheexistingGCCOGtransportationsysteminclude:

    TheGatewayCitiesSubregionhasanapproximatepopulationof1,988,000.Overthenexttenyears,subregionalpopulationisexpectedtoincreasesixpercent,withthehighestincreasesinSantaFeSprings 13percent andLongBeach eightpercent .Employmentisexpectedtoincreasebyfourpercentinthesubregion.

    Approximately67percentofthetripsgeneratedinthesubregionhavedestinationsinsidetheGatewayCities’boundariesaswell.ThenextlargestdestinationsareOrangeCounty ninepercent ,CentralLosAngeles ninepercent ,andSouthBayCities ninepercent .Theaveragetriptimesforthesedestinationsrangefrom22to32minutes.By2024,tripsandaveragedelaysareexpectedtoincreasebyapproximatelyfourpercentandeightpercent,respectively.

    Subregionalsafetyisamajorconcern,particularlyonfreeways.Approximately39percentofthefreewaysysteminthesubregionfeaturesaccidentratesthatare30percentabovethestatewideaverageforsimilarfacilities.Thesafetyproblemisexacerbated

    bythelargenumberoftrucksaccessingthePortsofLongBeachandLosAngeles.

    TransitservicesintheGatewayCitiesincludecommuterandintercitypassengerrail,lightrail,rapidandexpressbusservice,andlocalbusservices.Serviceisprovidedbymultipleoperators,includingAmtrak,Metrolink,Metro,LongBeachTransit,LADOT,andseverallocaloperators.Theseserveabout318,790tripseachweekday.Ofthesetrips,approximately311,000boardoralightinthesubregion,and7,770passthrough.Thelargestshareofestimatedridershiptakesplaceonlocalandotherbuses 60percent ,followedbylightrail 32percent ,rapidandexpressbuses 5.5percent ,andcommuterandintercityrail 2.5percent .

    Anaverageof5,750vehiclesperweekdayusethe18park‐and‐ridefacilitiesinthesubregion,representingabout81percentofthedailyparkingcapacityof7,130vehicles.Severallotsareatornearcapacity.

    Combined,thePortsofLongBeachandLosAngelesrepresentthelargestcontainerportcomplexintheUnitedStatesandtheeighthlargestintheworld.Morethan31percentofallmarinecontainersintheU.S.movedthroughtheseportsin2012.Assuch,theGatewayCitiessubregionishometoacomplexgoodsmovementsystemcomprisedoftheports,intermodalrailyards,warehouses,andtransloadingfacilities,whichareconnectedtoanextensivenetworkofhighwaysandrailroadlineswhichgeneratesignificantvolumesoftruckandtraintraffic.Goodsmovementinthesubregionisanticipatedtodoubleoreventripleoverthenext20years.

  • Gateway Cities STP Overview

    Executive Summary

    S T R A T E G I C T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N O V E R V I E W – G A T E W A Y C I T I E S March 2015 Page ES-5

    Goals and Objectives TheGatewayCitiesishometothePortofLongBeach,theAlamedaCorridor,largeintermodalrailyards,truckdepots,andvastwarehouseanddistributioncenters.Thesegoodsmovementfacilitiesprovidesignificanteconomicbenefitsforthesubregion,butalsoresultsinsignificantcommunityandregionalimpactsfromtruckandtrainactivity,includinghistoricallypoorairqualityandlimitedmobilityonsurfacestreetsandfreeways.Furthermore,theGatewayCitiesishometoalargetransit‐dependentpopulation,withmedianhouseholdincomessevenpercentlowerthantheLosAngelesCountyaverage.

    ThroughtheSTP,theGatewayCitieshaveidentifiedthefollowingmultimodaltransportationgoals,whichareconsistentwiththecounty’soverallframeworkconsistingofsixbroadthemescommonamongallsubregions seeFigureES‐2 :

    Mobility

    Reduceroadwaycongestionandimprovetraveltimes

    Improvesystemconnectivity

    Provideincreasedtransitandactivetraveloptions

    Safety

    Reducesafetyincidentsandcollisions

    Sustainability

    Improveairqualityandpublichealth

    Reducegreenhousegas GHG emissions

    Improvequalityoflife

    Economy

    Strengthentheeconomythroughefficientgoodsmovementandjobcreation

    Accessibility

    Providenewmultimodalaccess

    Increaseservicetolow‐incomeandtransit‐dependentresidents

    Improvefirst/lastmileconnectionstotransit

    State of Good Repair

    Extendthelifeofexistingtransportationfacilitiesandequipment

    Subregional Projects and Programs AninitialprojectandprogramlistfortheGatewayCitiesSTPwascompiledfrompriorsubregionalandcountywidestudies,includingunfunded2009LRTPprojects;unfundedMeasureRscopeelements;andadditionalsubregionalneeds.TheprojectandprogramlistwasupdatedthroughanextensiveoutreachprocesstoincorporateinputfromsubregionstakeholdersincludingeachofthecitiesintheGCCOG,LosAngelesCounty,Caltrans,thePortofLongBeach,LongBeachTransit,andtheGCCOG.Over550transportationimprovementprojectsandprogramswereidentifiedfortheGatewayCities.

  • Gateway Cities STP Overview

    Executive Summary

    S T R A T E G I C T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N O V E R V I E W – G A T E W A Y C I T I E S March 2015 Page ES-6

    Figure ES-2. Common Countywide Themes for All Mobility Matrices

  • Gateway Cities STP Overview

    Executive Summary

    S T R A T E G I C T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N O V E R V I E W – G A T E W A Y C I T I E S March 2015 Page ES-7

    Evaluation TheSTPefforthasaninvolveddetailedevaluationofthesystemwideinteractionsofprojectsandprogramsintheGatewayCities.Evaluationandsummarizationofresultsisongoing,andresultshavenotyetbeenapprovedbysubregionalstakeholders.Assuch,detailedevaluationsoftheSTPprojectsareasyetunavailable.However,thedevelopmentofnewanalyticaltools,includingathree‐tiertrafficforecastingmodelandanupdatedairqualityandgreenhousegasemissionsmodel,willallowforarobustanalysisoftheperformanceofproposedprojectsasneededintheforthcomingMetroLRTPupdate.FinalsubregionalprojectandprogramanalysisresultswillbemadeavailablewhentheSTPiscomplete,expectedinlate2015.

    Implementation Timeframes and Cost Estimates ForconsistencywiththeMobilityMatrix,theSTPhasincludedthedevelopmentofhigh‐level,roughorder‐of‐magnitudeplanning‐costrangesforshort‐,mid‐,andlong‐termsubregionalfundingneeds.TableES‐1indicatesanticipatedGatewayCitiesSTPcostestimaterangesbyprojecttype.NotethatimplementationtimeframesforSTPprojectsareunderdevelopmentpendingstakeholderandGCCOGreviewandwillnotbefinaluntilanticipatedadoptionoftheSTP.Severalprojectcostsremainunknownatthistime.ForthemostpartTableES‐1reportsonlycapitalcostsandomitscostsassociatedwithvehicles,operating,maintenanceandfinancing.

    Duetovariationsinprojectscopeandavailabledata,costsestimatedfortheSTParenotintendedtobeusedforfutureproject‐levelplanning.Rather,thecostrangesdevelopedviathisprocessconstituteahigh‐level,roughorder‐of‐magnitudeplanningestimaterangeforshort‐,mid‐,andlong‐termsubregionalfundingneedsfortheSTPeffortonly.MoredetailedanalysismaybeconductedthroughtheMetroLRTPupdateprocess,whichmaynecessitaterefinementofproject/programdetailsandassociatedcostestimates.

    Sincethelistwascompiledfromvarioussources,someoftheprojectsinthelistmayoverlapinscopeorpurpose,leadingtoduplicativecostsinthecostmatrix.ProjectsorprogramsthatcrosssubregionalboundariesmaybeincludedinneighboringsubregionalMobilityMatrixprojectlistsaswell.Wherethesameprojectsorprogramsareincludedinmultiplesubregions,thecostestimatesincludethetotalestimatedprojectcost,notthecostshareforeachsubregion.Anysubregionalcostsharingwillbedeterminedthroughfutureefforts.

    What’s Next? CompletionandadoptionoftheSTP.Overthe

    followingseveralmonths,theSTPTACandmemberjurisdictionswillbereviewingSTPelements,withadoptionofthefinalSTPprogramanticipatedinlate2015.

    GatewayCitiesPrioritizationofProjects. Withlimitedexceptions,theSTPstudydoesnotprioritizeprojects.Instead,itprovidessomeoftheinformationneededfordecisionmakerstoprioritizeprojects/programs,andanunconstrainedlistofpotentialtransportation

  • Gateway Cities STP Overview

    Executive Summary

    S T R A T E G I C T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N O V E R V I E W – G A T E W A Y C I T I E S March 2015 Page ES-8

    projects/programsintheregion.InpreparationforapotentialballotmeasureandLRTPupdate asdescribedfurtherbelow ,theGCCOGshoulddecidehowitwantstoprioritizetheseprojects/programsassumingaconstrainedfundingscenario.

    MetroBallotMeasurePreparations. MetrowillbeginworkingwiththeGCCOGtoensuresubregionalinputasitstartsdevelopingapotentialballotmeasure.Partoftheballotmeasureworkwouldinvolvegeographicequitydetermination,aswellasdeterminingtheamountoffundingavailableforeachcategoryofprojects/programsandsubregionsoftheCounty.

    MetroLRTPUpdate.ThepotentialballotmeasurewouldthenfeedintoafutureMetroLRTPupdateandbeintegratedintotheLRTPFinancePlan.Ifadditionalfundingbecomesavailablethroughaballotmeasureorothernewfundingsourcesorinitiatives,thelistofprojectsdevelopedthroughtheMobilityMatrixandanysubsequentlistdevelopedbythesubregioncouldbeusedtoupdatetheconstrainedprojectlistfortheLRTPmovingforward.

  • Gateway Cities STP Overview

    Executive Summary

    S T R A T E G I C T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N O V E R V I E W – G A T E W A Y C I T I E S March 2015 Page ES-9

    Table ES-1. Gateway Cities STP Summary Rough Order of Magnitude Cost Estimates

    Type/ Category Highway Arterial Transit

    Active Transportation

    Goods Movement Other

    Regional Facilities Total

    Total

    Estimates for 69 out of 97

    Projects $12.4B – $19.3B

    Estimates for 160 out of

    290 Projects $1.1B – $1.7B

    Estimates for 38 out of

    50 Projects $6.9B – $10.4B

    Estimates for 54 out of

    59 Projects $210M – $320M

    Estimates for 8 out of 8 Projects

    $5.9B – $8.8B

    Estimates for 30 out of

    31 Projects $2.3B – $3.5B

    Estimates for 18 out of

    27 Projects $852M –

    $1.3B

    Estimates for 377 out of

    562 Projects $29.7B – $45.3B

    Estimatedcostsin2015dollars.Theseestimatesunderrepresenttheoperationsandmaintenancecostsduetolimitationsofdataavailability.Costsarealsounderestimatedduetoprojectsandprogramswherecostestimaterangesarestillunderdevelopment.Projectsorprogramsthatcrosssubregionalboundariesmaybeincludedinmultiplesubregionalprojectlists.Wherethesameprojectsorprogramsareincludedinmultiplesubregions,thecostestimatesincludethetotalestimatedprojectcost,notthecostshareforeachsubregion.Anysubregionalcostsharingagreementswillbedeterminedthroughfutureplanningefforts.OneexceptiontothisintheGatewayCitiesSTPistheGreenLineExtensionfromTorrancetotheMetroBlueLinewherethecostisincludedintheSouthBayCitiesMobilityMatrix.SomecostestimatesmaybeduplicativeastheSTPprojectlistincludesprogramsthatmayincludesomeofthespecificprojectssubmittedbylocaljurisdictions.