Gay Marriage (Eng) Kinda Rough Draft.doc

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Gay Marriage (Eng) Kinda Rough Draft.doc

    1/7

    Ransdell 1

    Matthew Ransdell

    Melinda Zepeda

    Composition 1301-111

    9:30

    Gay Marriage

    Same-sex marriage is a widespread social issue in the United States. I believe

    that a person who is a homosexual does not mean that they are any less human than a

    heterosexual. We all live, feel emotion, and breathe the same air as any other human

    being regardless of our preferred sexual orientation. Because I believe these things, I

    support gay marriage.

    Marriage is a basic civil right that everyone is entitled to enjoy at their own free

    will. Should a couple be prevented from marrying one another is to strip them of one of

    their basic rights. For instance, an African American man can marry a Caucasian female,

    to deny same-sex couples the same privileges, is to discriminate against homosexuals.

    According to the U.S. Supreme Courts declaration in 1974s Cleveland Board of

    Education v. LaFleur, the freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family

    life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause. This is stating that the

    decision to get married lies with the individual rather than with the government.

    If all of mankind was created equal, then we should all share the same rights as

    everyone else. If African American man can marry a Caucasian female, then to deny

    same-sex couples the same privileges is to discriminate against homosexuals.

    Marriage is the next logical progression after a civil union because a civil union

    has some of the same rights as a marriage. Though this is true, it is only legal in certain

  • 7/29/2019 Gay Marriage (Eng) Kinda Rough Draft.doc

    2/7

    Ransdell 2

    states. If same-sex couples are allowed to have a civil union, it only makes sense that

    they should be allowed to have the title of marriage. Forbidding homosexual couples

    from receiving that title is discrimination.

    People have fears that same-sex marriages are not a family oriented environment,

    but opposite-sex marriages can also have the same negative impact on children. Just

    because a marriage consists of two of the same genders does not mean that a child will be

    raised in a hostile environment. Children to opposite-sex parents are still often

    succumbed to problematic childhoods, due to distant or abusive parents.

    Allowing same-sex couples to marry amongst one another would encourage the

    acceptance of diversity among many people around the United States. There are a lot of

    people who disagree with same-sex marriage and would rather discriminate against

    homosexuals who wish to get married with their partner. To legalize same-sex marriage

    would increase the acceptance by many Americans. The same concept happened with the

    abolishment of slavery in 1865. This action may have caused a lot of controversy, but

    people came to accept that African Americans were now free to do as they please and

    work alongside those who are not colored. Legalizing gay marriage would have the same

    effect, although it may be easier to accept due to the reason that people in recent times are

    more open-minded than they were during the 1800s.

    Legalizing same-sex marriage could also potentially lead to an increase of

    adoption rates since most child adoption agencies will not allow you to adopt unless you

    are married. According to the Adopt America Network, there are 130,000 children in the

    U.S. alone waiting to be adopted. If the United States were to legalize gay marriage, then

    that couple would be able to adopt a child meaning more children would have families

  • 7/29/2019 Gay Marriage (Eng) Kinda Rough Draft.doc

    3/7

    Ransdell 3

    instead of having to wait in an adoption home for a heterosexual couple to adopt them.

    More children in the United States would then have a home to go to at the end of the day

    rather than having to sit around doing nothing in an adoption home. Not only would the

    adoption rates increase, but it has also been published on June 7, 2010 byPediatrics that

    children of lesbian mothers are socially and academically more competent and have

    fewer social problems than children of heterosexual parents. In another study published

    on July 19, 2010, children of lesbian, gay, and straight parents were all equally adjusted

    to one another. This shows that even though a childs parents may be homosexual, it

    does not mean that the child will grow up socially inadequate.

    Although same-sex marriage is acceptable by quite a few people around the

    nation, the marriage between two males or females goes against my religious beliefs. In

    the bible, it is stated that a man shall not lie with another man because it is cause to be put

    to death. For two men or women loving each other to be considered an act punishable by

    death, it is clear that it should be forbidden.

    Same-sex marriage is often viewed as an issue in the United States, but there are

    viable solutions to solve the problem that many face. Seeing as same-sex couples do not

    have the same privileges as a married couple, but some people do not want gay couples to

    be able to marry, a civil union could be given those same privileges. For instance, same-

    sex couples in a civil union can be given the privilege to adopt as easily as a married

    heterosexual couple would have. Giving homosexual couples the same privileges as

    married heterosexual couples would bring same-sex marriage one step closer to

    becoming a reality. Doing so would open more peoples minds to the idea of a same-sex

    marriage being a normal thing in our world today.

  • 7/29/2019 Gay Marriage (Eng) Kinda Rough Draft.doc

    4/7

    Ransdell 4

    Works Cited

  • 7/29/2019 Gay Marriage (Eng) Kinda Rough Draft.doc

    5/7

    Ransdell 5

    Annotated Bibliography

    Boies, David. "Gay Marriage Is Protected by the US Constitution." Gay Marriage. Ed.

    Debra A. Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. At Issue. Rpt. from "Gay

    Marriage and the Constitution: Why Ted Olson and I Are Working to Overturn

    California's Proposition 8." Wall Street Journal20 July 2009. Gale Opposing

    Viewpoints In Context. Web. 19 Nov. 2012. This article is helpful. Constitutional

    right to marry.

    Dodd, Chris. "Gay Marriage Promotes Equality." Social Justice. Ed. William Dudley.

    San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Rights,

    Responsibilities and Love."Meriden (Connecticut) Record-Journal21 June

    2009.Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 19 Nov. 2012. Learning to

    accept same-sex marriage. Somewhat helpful.

    Kellard, James. Gay Marriage Could Infringe on Religious Liberties. "Gay Marriage

    Should Be Legal." Gay Marriage. Ed. Debra A. Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven

    Press, 2012. At Issue. Rpt. from "Do We Have a Constitutional Right to Ban Gay

    Marriage?" 2011. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 19 Nov. 2012.

    Arguments based on religious freedom. Counter claim possibility.

    ---. Gay Marriage is a Human Rights Issue. "Gay Marriage Should Be Legal." Gay

    Marriage. Ed. Debra A. Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. At Issue. Rpt.

    from "Do We Have a Constitutional Right to Ban Gay Marriage?" 2011. Gale

    Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 19 Nov. 2012. People treat gays as a

    lesser people. Being gay doesnt justify physical harm. Good article.

  • 7/29/2019 Gay Marriage (Eng) Kinda Rough Draft.doc

    6/7

    Ransdell 6

    ---. Gay Marriage Should be Legal. "Gay Marriage Should Be Legal." Gay Marriage.

    Ed. Debra A. Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. At Issue. Rpt. from "Do

    We Have a Constitutional Right to Ban Gay Marriage?" 2011. Gale Opposing

    Viewpoints In Context. Web. 19 Nov. 2012. Institution of marriage not real.

    Children and gay parents. Good Article.

    Lithwick, Dahlia. "The Defense of Marriage Act Should Not Be Defended in the

    Courts." Gay Marriage. Ed. Debra A. Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. At

    Issue. Rpt. from "Indefensible: Why the Obama Administration Changed Its Mind

    About the Defense of Marriage Act." Slate.com. 2011. Gale Opposing Viewpoints

    In Context. Web. 19 Nov. 2012. Obama administration not defending DOMA.

    Somewhat useful. Maybe last resort if at all.

    Molinet, Rudy. "The Defense of Marriage Act Should Be Repealed." Gay Marriage. Ed.

    Debra A. Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. At Issue. Rpt. from "Defense

    of Marriage Act Is No Longer Defensible and Should Be

    Repealed."KeysNews.com. 2011. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 19

    Nov. 2012. Gays get full and equal protection of laws. Useful article.

    Sprigg, Peter. "Gay Marriage Should Not Be Legal." Gay Marriage. Ed. Debra A. Miller.

    Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. At Issue. Rpt. from "The Top Ten Harms of

    Same-Sex Marriage." Family Research Council, 2011. Gale Opposing Viewpoints

    In Context. Web. 19 Nov. 2012. Taxpayers, consumers, businesses forced to

    subsidize same-sex marriages. Schools teaching same/opposite sex marriage is

    the same. Useful counter claim.

  • 7/29/2019 Gay Marriage (Eng) Kinda Rough Draft.doc

    7/7

    Ransdell 7

    Trowbridge, Ron. "There Are Several Constitutional Hurdles to Gay Marriage." Gay

    Marriage. Ed. Debra A. Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. At Issue. Rpt.

    from "Six Constitutional Hurdles to Gay Marriage."Human Events (5 Sept.

    2010).Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 19 Nov. 2012. Constitutional

    complications/difference in interpretations.

    von Spakovsky, Hans. "The Defense of Marriage Act Should Be Defended in the

    Courts." Gay Marriage. Ed. Debra A. Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. At

    Issue. Rpt. from "Obama Drops Pretense, Administration Will Not Defend

    DOMA."The Foundry. 2011. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 19

    Nov. 2012. President Obama does not defend DOMA. Somewhat useful counter

    claim.