GENERAL INMATE CORRESPONDENCE • TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE - INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION

tr 1-200 (071).3)

Mr. Robert J. Zani, #328938 10/17/95 kichael Unit 80-41 Rt. 1 Box 4500 Tennessee Golony, TX 75086

Dear Zani,

Your letter was postmarked October 13 and reached me today.

It was cancelled at Tyler, to zip beginning 757.

I'm sorry there is nothih!.: I can do to help you. I',„m out of cpekact with

any who mijit. It has not been safe for me to drive out of Frederick for two decades

and I have not. 'Then I've been out of town it was to boriven to hospitals for medical

consultations and surgeries. Au 4' indicated earlier I spend all the time I can on

.;riting and then to restrict my interests to that now.

You mention Nagell. While I have no doubt he had had intelligence connections

I also have no doubt that his story aboufrobuing that bank to have an alibi because he

knew U1E:assassination was corning is a lie.

Liming the matters in cumr4o/Wtth all the assassination stories is that those who

make. them up lack the knowledge to avpid significant errors of fact.

liagell also fails on that score.

There remains a sort of mystery about all thit:. kkfter he served his time he

went to East Germany and wao picked up. His release was arranged by a lawyer who had

in the past handled suchm matters fur the CIA, Ricey sew, of Washington, D

I could have interviewed "agell while he was in jail. I beiievedit would

have been a waste of time and didnt.

Sofry I cant be of help. But I wish you *kat seems unlikely, go4luckl

evd7Harold Weisberg

The envelope had a little printed slip in it reading "GaluLL INMATE CLUESPONDENCE

MUMS DkrefiliTHIRET uF CLUILINAL JUSTIUE -INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION."I thought prisoner mail

was no lonrer censored

DcrAER 81H cicf

, 1-1f) R DLO LxiF_LSEER G F-

FREbER-LCIC, MD. t 901

AnR-Lo- ZoNt. PilATIER

EN;cLosuRgs ALL FLDERFIL LuiAT

LSRE. R

Aon S Ekm1G [ILLY niAb ASSLSTANC.E 1.3.1 OPErviA16 UP 1)t-E_ &Rio- ZANm friliTER

SANTL Er%Rit•, Was P. VERY HLGrt POLL;ERED DEA- CIA Ern PLDAL -oPEN1-141. LvHO CA...As ey_A211E.RE0 IA MIS CouNIEYi, i TEXAS, t lerM -1c09: HE curs ,l1uP.DE.Re.L) iThPauGri THE_ USSR. His mOIZDER BI mE LL';SIR, 11N) Dirs ONLY 1--EDEOAL QAT" iSicaDEcr b5SR Pal:L.11CM_ rA uRDf.R vN Rta krLAN) SorEL, To T- tlns REENJ CuVERED u? ID17,0 E-Air_14 siv ELL A c.caZDENIG Tr 0+JDLS PO c/ c N cJI\J rEs TED Fr. o_ErmL Coup, -T- REGJR.ft L.3 11-*_ (1x1CLubtdp TRAr\SSCl/LOT), 1-1- U,.5. D. C. HoU5T6 N ANkt u. Cik.u..t...6 I. A cuii•L casLi Lu .NJ ALL PoLNTS.], 7)-tERL ARE FE PERAL LrrL EN)FOCC.ErY1EArr PtZiNNEL wi-10 C.C_Lt.ENE.., a NI BLINENILE, 11-1-_A NILO 0RLE rS ,„ 'OAT Tys,L. RA- Nrcs- 241.11 Cc,t)f-i2uP TCS LLNKID TO -Die_ RUH -0S11),Al_p - IFK. r I-EP.. E uE1,1 rriew 6 , As -Jou LLB k:Ntt.d, it officIAL PoSi- Tr& 4f- T11E 00.1, F61, awc, T ExAS L>Zw EN11'0PCErnL141- IS MO- OSLUAlL A cir_e, (1_0NA PueOt 7)-_-"Z)

Amia Prkpir MERE tkAS CGN SPL Rani C-DuEfeLJP. ) THE:RE ARE r LEAST"

SECV,EN A RID-2ANLI ohlE_ Ts SA- 76- 93?3 , F61 cr\i Apero (\LTG), t.,07trth

RuAS Al_one.6-r 1, duo ri)116€5, n Tot:clit'S A UARTE:11 uF rnA iTeizS, rNiCLuoi-AL- RiA9- csumw-

ff-K

If nRE or GAIL Fnivr) EnR iLtrri SrANE 611 NE RE_ is ti &LIR_ PirnotAiT of - LNFamcfmNA

SEvERm_ GdK6R1:55-1.4NINL RLCGRDS (PARilcuLor..1:/ I943, PACE H-6,19) ra !)In

1AtiRLORES6(15 10. LTOintINE. RARLO. 7 DEALPREss, 1485. 171._ oFficIAL Posy 1\1 of

DIE DOT 1 , ram STA rc Lau) EN Foa EmENT is MAT BA F.D DIED Ac4. CCI.OLnir FIL DEA7)1

THOSE_ ARE PE_uPLE. LUHr> offs_itekel 5fii3 FoR 33 le [-IPS ?1-phi HEN infAesHALL

11f) Esni'LoYEE rt5,4 B PoLLTILAL ASS( SSYLN P Pa ITAYi LA_Jp6 A 11 ArLS S-DI c ̀I!

L LL34LILD at% cJ nRE FrrniLine. LuITIA N.\a r-c,r2ali& An.. Irv-roil; Prb9Pstifcc

So 'la) r.t.,,&.u.) or 1/3 (.1tti-, ah ) nes rI F 1t€, Ft-Icr, It G,` Sue./ FLD r o DiAT

1‘40E.Eb MA 12 tlran MURoEf(Eb, AnrC. i)fpit i T LuV)Liin /gm yr_ ARAI DviP&SSLALE

Fb12 iiirA TO llr,uf Cbm r Tii irIY r■4 PoINE.2 STh PEO P Slr'fE4n-0 1\7:Diet4L

F-F-Lcifts ANAD■11■1 Thr_ GFaLIAL CiJucsuP- LIE C, NiS PIP/46/, BE Crx_SE TA)

%1-1- IT )f_• CorAL 6H-rLmiNtiq niuMEE PuLTAI6S CLimoALI) jiJOCE (L-A),Aeiis PULLAJ6-

11 (Ylucli )-4As IKEE1:% LE AS POn6u1- 1)1rt _Thtsrat rit,E

MARSHALL. CASE tiANII 111E_ PREPoS if PiLL 0 F-ftc.L CiES ANO CCUER03 E_ES dc.L) c FF

61,1-1-6 11"E Pug"

FoR. n - rium$_/ ru‘iks Csa niam TArc LuDi-Al& A .CE PrES

DErv)L4 b1.1PRoSECuitLa Nr_fit\I-D■r6S (11.1 "NEI() T.N1 1)-1,E mr F Pm' 5170'

-

(Mr) P.CH nc611, accfl PC'oc/F dF NW__ FALSE CH Ai2LES DC.t LFSEQraTELV Fit ne:;AINST- fInE,

t FIRT_O , SEE L11NLV, Cat_r_t\IS R - CPI - , 0,S, D.C. AuSTINI (FE bF RAl_ N1aLsE.r1i CORPUS) CI)SE At•tn. f-nn ITER 1.1.,11Zai ltE FE- DEIML CA). hs\n FEDERAL S-751F./,r)

CLAricAuALL'i REFUSE TO HANDLE ANL, LIES Cul Tr1 AIIASII)or.) To A kiln ARC

E V 1)DE o 11-t_ Fu_LIZECcdR4N CA -6t1 IS @itioNn Trtf._ PALE. cTeR R Ric.; 2nai

LINI5 16Am riNictuot.44...) Cn kzus n-AQCEuz, Sw1)-tfaNi ME Pica, FLPF Em bsairEs,

n RE --EK% OT>tE12 PRILA TO $ECGMIN DIREcroR cF htf_

CHILF.JuoCc_ FOR i is LIUESIVZNI DIS7UcT d r- TEXAS, Tub ( LU3LLx pun S, Sf

TOOK Cku,.1bER o NJ rivE Vs ZAP m A rif:e kkoinive R IN 2 Ash \i L.:Eu.2,4m s

SF% -t?)- 201- CA, O. C. SrAN:1 AN 1.1 Nir a N REC&IL3-

I 1YE CoLAT REC.:JR, TN T/- locS- 21;Na_ \J, PpiaNIES D,S, 0, C, Lfe,

PANEL af- c-LAT cS APPEALS FoR? CIRCLI7 MAKES r i .J.EeV cLEr-AZ

ON ■-■w_ REcciRo 11-Ip7 f)t€ gA RIO- 2.ANIT_ MAI 12 (DIRECTLY (4CoPESSEL)) r4Na RE Lq

CAA TEAS ARE_ AUILL 6L c3F F- Ltirit5 c),r.L NOT TO gE CciNSIDERED EVER 1INJ DIE

Cleas-c- — nspsz. fl Cci.JIZT FALSLftED cm-NCI-10(.1S. Ccutr Pr SI/YIPLV

11-tr_ PALE. RENIEMbERI.,\16-, SIrnuLTAklEoUSLY, MCAT T1 ira c- FT-4 Ci.Rcua-T"

DtsrylInsED C RLc r-nr.,{2C.Q_Lo LiNST Cos\s‘,1_CT-Ic".1 ANC, Ser him FREE.. U.S. u .

(NnnQcCi n $r)(D 1,D.11 114? Ls-m 1%9)3

1\.10 'loll Fftt.51' Cr.1 inn-vCH ' ACELL C_Efifi? 6.3cLaSf..0. -1)-LSE Tco

nvi_ [Bad U ERLF-Lpdq_e_,

'N-k; rno-Sr 0Ifficut_T (L,MisEs2G, Ls Kka.L.ru.IG GuttER'L To f)E63]., C.VECIALL

11px165 ERSIC-1 CatERE.J.JT,

SIRAICriTfezikAizzi_J, i I1r1lf_o..1b/ ONE_ f-r..bALGt.Sui.c.TIDIA EVER, at IKNoCEXILE 1S OA Vicit)S

CL;rr Fri Als,a1 s-LAJOI2N To; N't.)W AlToRNEY WILL CiiiALLEnkE 0-W_Pir)

If ).A) ARE IM Ola mLGttr FEE tAIA.A.A FLEnSE LE V- NIL iCmciLL). IF

KitAtig M mE. LuVrri c“NnE.ces,E wiiO rfTLOIT ,i5E. ANC) CR 1AL 1-tf.d. C rvLE. hJakik.)CE.

c_auziNI DF_INJ\JG.; L-uslc,a aNn. ‘irET Aubi623 TIES. allo Luman

( Iui ukAteesim..a -r_ tm LURi TtJG Fill in -3A% PRISidN,

-//oL.1.

ROBERT N.5. 3.a Vt3 Mi_CI-In'it_OKaT, 6C- 44 .P.1. 1, box. (-1-,Sotl TEMESSEE Libra, TEos 7S iNG0

L _sci-tcoL boni SEVERAL -Li\TERESTTAT PEokE 1,0.3CLuDING Mc Lv,ryucK' u& IL:0CE, TEXAS CURT 0E- Cii.MLNAL APPEALS), LINDA BIgn JtANStinS Rci8,8

SEIV. Crd MILF2ifluTC.Hicor, ETC. (limn ALPHA Ali` isLtkor% • WAS c) ,‘ ltE cThifdf- oF- TE ANS , Vh)Sim:r CJ,16.S ns A TTAA.s(,,N700...

FGe_ fiLco LuAKfC•LuT,T1-i CLDSED (alEcauN.S (f)a. )-fivEs)

B, Mc?

Ff_ff mh_ IR t; H N..1

TY _ER ORLEaNES

May 31, 1992

Hon. Ronald F. Ederer United States Attorney Western District of Texas A-601 Hemisfair Plaza 727 E. Durango Blvd. San Antonio, TX 78206

Re: Ganucheau letter (enclosed). Bario-Zani matter.

'1r. Ederer:

EncIpscd is a copy of a letter (4 [handwritten] pages) sent to Mr.

`Li! Gilbert F. Ganucheau, Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, dated May

. 19, 1992. It concerns a long running matter, the Bario-Zani matter, in state

rc courts, U.S. district courts within the Fifth Circuit and including the Fifth

25; z Circuit itself. Vis a vis the enclosure I recently testified in federal court 1 d,,.< for approximately 12 hours on May 4-5, 1992. As the enclosure correctly and

II explicitly states:

A. The State of Texas conceded (previously) that the same people ultimately responsible for the set-up and murder of federal law enforcement agent Sante Bario (DEA-CIA) were the same people who were responsible for setting me up, false prosecution, fictitious stories, silencing me, etc.

B. The State of Texas conceded that Sante Bario was, ultimately, "murdered by employees of the U.S.S.R." (Dario died in San Antonio in 1979.)

Although such matters were certainly in-court conceded, as specified in the Ganucheau letter (Soviet murder and vicarious prosecutions in America and coverups), the State's argument is that the State and its employees have been/are loyal proxies for the Soviet government, and that, although such a government no longer exists, I was prosecuted by and am being held by, vicariously, the Soviet government and individuals loyal to that government. Tragically, the State of Texas "merely" took 12 years to concede the truth, during which time certain people have lied prolifically, have acted only to cover up, which has included, inter alia, the deliberate creation of false, cover up, set up situations. The State's in-court concessions have far-reaching implications. Succinctly, the State admits Bario was murdered, ultimately by the Soviet Union, that there was no/will be no prosecution, that the State of Texas prosecuted me as a Soviet proxy ploy to cover up the all-important Bario case--and that there is nothing wrong with all that! Nothing wrong with covering up the War For Drugs, poisonings, Soviet murders, and Soviet proxy prosecutions in America.

I have advised the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the U.S. Department of Justice--Civil Rights Division--and many others of the State's in-court concessions, including the murder of Sante Dario in San Antonio, Texas--1978-79 by the U.S.S.R.

Inadvertently or advertently, the State has revealed in court, 12 years late, precisely why the State has been "unable" to release me.

As the enclosed Ganucheau letter accurately states, I have volunteered to appear unconditionally before any federal grand fury concerning this--or any related--matter; and I know of several state employees who should be

subpoenaed to explain fully and factually their mulr.ifarious desperate acts to keep me locked up; in light of their own attorney's in-court concessions.

Re: part 19 of the Ganucheau letter, page 4, the reason I was not allowed to testify at "my own" state trial was that, in part, the state court could not handle the subject of my innocence. Two (2) federal courts have passed ruling on the issue, as part 19 accurately states.

The Bario case has certain similarities to the notorious Henry H. Marshall case in Texas, 1961-1984, but is much more expansive than the Marshall case, and the State has already conceded/confessed a "fix" in the Bario coverup.

The Bush Administration may (or may not) be in office in January 1993. This may well be the only real opportunity this administration has to open and air out this matter. Now is an ideal time in light of the State's in-court concessions. Otherwise, this unique situation will be left to another administration or an anti-drug judge. I am ready, willing and ab].e to appear before your grand jury at any time--no holds barred.

Sincerely,

Uhl .. Robert J. i No. 328919 Michael Unit, 12E-19 Rt. 1, Box 4500 Tennessee Colony, TX 75886

P.S. In order perforce to coverup this entire situation, including the War For Drugs, enumerated poisonings, murders and other matters, I understand a "Mr. Fero" has written a libelous book about me. And although I have only one final conviction ever wherein innocence is obvious, Fero had the brazen effrontery to call his book, "The Zani Murders." While I don't know if, appropriately, the author was paid in rubles, cocaine, or both, the purpose of his book has now been revealed in court by the State of Texas; pure Soviet coverup propaganda. That foreign governments commit murder, etc., is well known; that they have done so conspiratorialy in the past in America is known fact: Orlando Letelier, Ronni Moffit, etc. Fero should be the first witness federally subpoenaed to testify, under strict penalties of perjury, before a grand jury in the Bario-Zani matter. He will hide behind the First Amendment. He should be forced to answer for his imaginative pack of lies, his twisted fantasies made profitable, and his seedy pimping for Soviet murders and various, vicious, vicarious prosecutions.

A thorough but incomplete list of Fero's inmate and jail and prison snitches/tricks is on file in federal court in Tyler, Texas. It is not known how much they were paid-rewarded for their inaccurate information, or their relationship with any Texas attorney general.

Note: I have read copied portions of Fero's trash. He cannot hold up before a grand jury. His "book" is a lie a page. Considering the fact the State has conceded in court that Bario was "murdered"--Fero's full motivation (and that of others) has been unveiled.

SEIL ; Iv_OREa^rIS jomiNE. P)RRTO, 7)-IL 01_1=!1_ NESS, )(AS.

FILL-) TN1 LL Rr 1 -11.1.;ST6ts

TILER NEW OPt_fry

May 19, 1992

Hon. Gilbert F. GanucheaL)/ Clerk U.3. Court of Appeals Fifth Cireuit 600 Camp Street, Room 100 New Orleans, LA 70130

Re: Civil causes No. 91-4823 (Raines), No. 91-4570 (White), No.

91-4810 (Berryhill) (Decided in that order)

Dear Mr. Ganucheau:

The above three (3) cases were recently ruled on by the

Fifth Circuit Court. Apparently those cases were not assigned on

any sort of a rotating basis, but were all three (3) assigned to

the same panel. Why was that done? I was under the impression that cases in the Fifth Circuit were assigned on a

random/rotating basis. Due to what was said in these opinions, as well as what was iprlither said nor addressed, (omission), I want

to know why such a case assignment was made, specifically, and by whom? It certainly seems as though Judge Jolly wrote the "Per

Curiam" opinions in these cases, one of which is fantastic--as in

fantasy. Since there were two (2) conflicting decisions issued

simultaneously in No. 91-4823, I will not take that case up

further in detail in this letter. (All decisions were issued per

curiam.) Also, I would like to know why the name of Judge Jolly,

denying appointment of counsel, was blocked out on papers sent to

me? And, I would like to know if the special assignment of these

cases to a Jackson, Miss., judge was in connection with the

simultaneous resignation of the Hon. Charles Clark, Chief Judge,

Jackson, Miss.? Because I am going to the Administrative Office of the U.S.

Courts, again, and the D.O.J. Office of Professional Responsibility, again, and because I am going to ask that these

matters be thoroughly examined, I am stating that I believe such

actions, including the decisions in these cases, were, particularly 91-4810 and other previous decisions, made in

retaliation for just criticism, whistleblowing, and the mere

mentioning of the Sante Bario case.

BACKGROUND

1. The first time I was in the Fifth Circuit, I did not

prevail, precisely, but I did receive justice--a decade ago--from Judges Tate, Gee, and Garza.

2. However, in 1985, in causes No. 84-1005 and No. 84-2434 and

No. 85-1216, it became readily apparent that something was

seriously amiss in the Fifth Circuit, cases wherein relief was

tl.en 4 ed simply because of the non-payment of filing fees by one

obviously and indisputably indigent. That was totally wrong. Such actions were deliberately taken, so noted, and were a sad preview of coming attractions. Such actions delineated in stone Fifth Circuit Court Policy toward me. My repeated protests fell and have fallen on deaf ears. Concerning the two (2) remaining cases referred to above, Judge Jolly's uncalled-for bombast, vitriol and evasiveness, particularly in 91-4810 is simply more gasoline on a fire which has been long burning; the egregiousness and enormous enormity of this peculiar situation is astonishing. Such an overall court policy, is, unveiled, nothing short of spite work and hate. Judge Jolly's use of the phrase "bald assertion" is belied by a long look at the entire record, my situation, and the Sante Bario case/matter.

3. Case after case, before and after No. 84-1005, 84-2434, and 85-1216 leave no doubt of a defacto policy; certainly districts courts and the Texas Attorney General's office have "picked up on" and understood this policy.

4. In 1986, in cases SA-83-2112-CA (San Antonio) and A-85-CA-477 (Austin) the Texas Attorney General took two (2) directly contradictory positions con-erning me and my state case. The U.S. District Courts in those cases both accepted the Texas Attorney General's positions and dismissed! I could not have "2 final convictions" and "no final conviction" ever. The TAG used the true fact that I had no final conviction ever to get A-85-CA-477 dismissed.

5. In 1986 in case SA-83-2112-CA, the State of Texas conceded that the people ultimately responsible for the silencing and murder of Sante Bario were the same people responsible for the dishonest/wrongful prosecution of me, for silencing me in court, and for sending me wrongfully/falsely to prison.

6. In May 1992, in cause H-88-1600 (Houston) when presentation of testimony and evidence, the state of Texas conceded that Sante Bario, a DEA employee and CIA operative in Mexico was murdered in the Bexar Co. Jail, San Antonio, by ultimately, employees and agents of the U.S.S.R. (1979).

7. The state prosecutor who wrongfully prosecuted me in state court in 1981 was later busted by the DEA; again, not a "bald assertion", but raw fact. The in rem case is published in the Fed. Supplement and Fed. Reporter. Joseph A. Turner.

8. Two (2) of the witnesses against me at my state trial, in 1981, Ocampo and Garcia, whose testimony was irrelevant, and whose "immaculate character and superb citizenship" (in Mexico) was vouched for by the Travis County District Attorney, in 1986 turned out to be 1981 self-identified members of the same group identified and prosecuted in the murder of DEA agent Enrique Carnarena Salazar, a DEA employee in Mexico--a widely publicized case, and a case once in the U.S. Supreme Court. A matter which was the subject of a variety of prosecutions and millions of

dollars expended.

9. AT virtually the mere mentioning of tT19 Oante Bario matter state and federal courts have dismissed, affirmed, and/or refused to so much as receive filing. If I had been allowed to testify at "my" state trial, allowed to call my witnesses, self-representation, etc., or if courts hadn't shut me off prior to 1)86, would Mt. C1marena Salazar still be alive today?

According to Judge Jolly, it is unimportant/"Irrelevant" how Sante Bario met his death (No. 91-1810, "Regardless of how Sante Bario met his demise . . .")

Regardless of the Federal Court fact that he was an innocent federal employee ultimately murdered by the Soviet Union--employees--living in Mexico?

Judge Jolly implies that there is no factual difference between natural death and murder. Has he and will he be so theoretically generous with criminal appellants in his court? have never personally alleged Sante Bario met his death via "poisoned peanut butter." Judge Jolly errs. I have stated under oath that his poisoning was one of an enumerated series of poisonings, non-prosecuted poisonings, which took place over a short period of time, including one which took place in the middle of my state trial; the poisoning of state witness Mr. Hogoyne, Sr., which was so "timely" as to eliminate his being cross-examined by the defense. On appeal the state court erroneously stated that court force--appointed counsel did not move for a "mistrial" after the successful poisoning-elimination of the witness to prevent deliberately his cross examination. Thus they wrongfully killed the issue.

10. Judge Jolly--and the District Court--did not dispute that on June 8, 1990, the TDC confiscated: 1) my Sante Bario file, 2) classified government documents, 3) documents relating to my state trial "innocence" claim which I had/have in court. (Cause 91-4810 was about the TDC's admitted seizure of legal documents/materials from me.) The relevance of the Sante Bario file to the papers seized is prima facie obvious: It was part of them. In 91-4810 Judge Jolly found the seized Sante Bario file "irrelevant" to the documents seized Why?'

11. Judge Jolly went to some research length to mention the legal Ben-Veniste reference anent the Sante Bario case. However, Judge Jolly failed to mention, in any way, just what court Sante Bario's emergency bond appeal cause was pending in when he was murdered (The Fifth Circuit). Judge Jolly also failed to mention that evidence uncovered after Bario's death established his innocence.

12. Judge Jolly in his discussion of the Bario matter failed to state that the Bario family had publically raised the issue of possible judicial corruption as lending itself to the Bario murder. Although such statements to not jibe with my personal knowledge, the Bario family, not I, have raised them. Publically.

13. It takes a heap o' malice to sanction someone for something non only not on the record, but not recorded anywhere! In order to approve sanctions by the District Court, Judge Jolly did just

a e)

-3-

I— that in 91-4810. And says so. fThe District Court sanctions were for sending for filing a 3-page document concerning--and only

- concerning--the Sante Bario case/file. Totally relevant to the vi documents seized by the Texas Prison system.

14. Judge Jolly's decisions, carefully examined, are right in line with decisions dating back to 1984-85. There is a Fifth Circuit Court policy against me, a sub silento policy in de facto effect. Sadly, it is an intellectual dishonesty comparable to the fiscal dishonesty of U.S. District Judge Robert Collins, convicted in the District Court in the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans.

15. Judge Jolly has, according to the full record in 91-4810, approved of the elimination of information/facts concerning: The Sante Bari() case, classified government documents, evidence relative/relevant to my factual innocence concerning my state case.

16. According to state and federal court records (no "bald assertion"), the only witness court force-appointed counsel presented in "my" state defense, who testified at length in/on my behalf, was later a major person in the investigation and prosecution of the assassin of the Hon. John H. Wood, Jr., Chief Judge, Western District of Texas. (Dr. Richard Garver) Dr. Garver was not on mv_ state witness list.

17. According to papers/documents filed in the Fifth Circuit, in a lengthy Title 28 Sect. 372 complaint and affidavit, dismissed by Chief Judge Clark on August 23, 1990, if it had not been for my quick and decisive actions, in times past, either one or two Article III judges would have been dead long ago. Those two (2) judges are still on the federal bench. Judge Kazen and Judge De Anda. Sadly, both judges were Democratically appointed--and the Jolly panel was all Republican appointed. (Mv Title 28 Sec t. 372 complaint pointed to the belief that "The Fifth Circuit well has

ct been poisoned against me and my litigation." That factually supported belief, dismissed on August 23, 1990, has proven again

-.2 and again to be fact.) 017-

18. Cause No. 91-4330 was dismissed in both the District Court

o and the Fifth Circuit because: It was a Habeas Corpus petition '4: filed on Habeas Corpus forms. There are several other decisions 1

1-- just as egregious including No. 89-12366 and 88-1590.

19. I have had the issue/claim of "a colorable showing of factual innocence" in two (2) federal courts. It has not been ruled on on its merits. It is again pending.

20. It is true and correct that in December of 1982, in case CRF-81-3065 in State District Court in Oklahoma (dismissed) I discussed under oath, and in part "bribe paid to judges and magistrates." Two (2) instances were discussed at length. Unfortunately, the media broadcast their version all over, and I heard from people in other states about it. The media failed to

mention, for some strange reason, that all such gratuities/favors, etc., took place, as described, in Central America, and that such "gratuitities" have been/are a way of life.

Thank you in advance for answering my questions. I volunteer to appear betore any Federal Grand Jury concerning this matter which is much more extensive and sad than I have related, including a Federal Grand Jury in New Orleans.

Anent litigation, at this point, all things considered, the overall record is so unbelievably bad, I know that the only justice possible is out-of-circuit.

I do wonder why the Fifth Circuit is so desperate to keep me wrongfully in prison.

Sincerely,

Robert J. Zani No. 328938 Michael Unit, 12E-19 Rt. 1, Box 4500 Tennessee Colony, TX 75886

copy: Administrative Office of the United States Courts Office of Professional Responsibility, Dept. of Justice U.S. Attorney, New Orleans, Louisiana Director, Federal Judicial Center U.S. Attorney, San Antonio, Texas U.S. Marshal, Houston, Texas Senator Joseph R. Biden, Jr. U.S. Marshal, San Antonio, Texas Drug Enforcement Administration, Houston U.S. Marshal, Tyler

mhzaiLo S)L-, 2d 114 1 ki)i

EVEQS (`c nru. SS EL)

T-R _1-1-1-k TS Si RN\IGER FICTIot\\

Lkicz■S OfFic.m."V CliPIP6E1) LuiTh t mUPnER._\ t LubmEA1, Ci-LLDREN'J,

Luis TPIEL w rilfRcli of ICI )) w 1-)E STATE or 6.E612G1c).

CuNNZCTFLI ciP as PREmEnfiniEn rnUPDE2S

4, ig L,As SENITEKACEn WENT Tc) Piu.Soklt

3. i/_) aLRLCT APPFnL To ME Erf=1)-i Cayisr-, H tipy),Juo6E_ birisootn, Arn J6 cibibes--N\po- Srvi\E RPPia_ HE 1-1W A FU'ruRE L,S.FYITGOVEI GENE06,1_, 61-2II-71-1\J B. BELL

(0. 13iF TEE A "Volf\ oP ft JE (S) YEnEIS JrCi:L/PRISor■\, H€ LuftS iNb_EASEL) ()NI PnRoLE IN] 1c11).S /

wr\s NEAP of AN1CfinfR FEIJA/V ACAIN3.

VOL) Cr ■1 LOOK Tr UP.,

WHo ?

SEE Tyif_

ANISLAJER

. H u N Ara__ IS WILLI Aor) (ALLEY, J-12.

111S TRI ()I_ TOOK PLACE Lr∎N Fr. BENINIIN16, -PrIE FRLi1-a ME -AS. DES:CR.1;3ED.

3 . Vol.) Cf-- IREri -Rf_ CAM_ iN A timx) LEAPAQV.. C FILLES ChLLELLJAV SI q F.Zd (31)-} (TR, icf2S)

ti 11IS OISSEN1r, FUTURE U.S. fYr‘OCNE1 GENERAL GQI BELL IbEALISTs'.C ALLV FE_ :

" ONE oF Tr/E.. UNIDERLYLN/G PRxic..rdLES (3 AiviER_Eciat\I JURLSOUUNICL L 'DIA.r No MAN OP I NI_S rirUttr.:,1•3

Trif_

D — Notolal KNIoLu nt,to FoRarEQ Kr\1oLL3 LutJAT 1-1A PPEJ\LS To ME M GUILT' IF EN\006i--k ect_cur. 2NwoLvE3.

AS FOR LART HAI-1114S (JUST 131E OPPOSITE) TO ITIE iciSuFILDLY INtstalgi IF ENO u 6H POLI TICS ARE 1.t.1\loLVEL),, Vou ay.] 1k1 4o Look DiAr uP. 1T-1( moCH rnoRE DIFFLCULT gECRUSE ()NE Alo.ST LEG -NRoulstA (..1-JIJERUPS, /-11-Lf- W0%5, P•to 011rE.R LIES. -INTERESTINGL/ ENoL6i-1, &R-r RECcRo IN A -q.-1-0)-6A3, 0,5,1).C, A osra,\, 7F11■11 \J. CoLLIK_IS 1S IN.S1 Rtic 11" +4 E., IN rrst \JE, .DECIC.T \LE.

N•Wir1LLE. —

. 1a7 SIATE.mENT S1 KENINEM Q. LUAI.ToNI, A RETIRED of FRI's DETRon- hFrf of-FicE;To DtE_ EFFECT FIAT 1)(.:Nou6ti

KNE1.1,. WHO MURZEREi ILM/Y0/ HCITA LI.JoGLy3 NEVER 'FRoSE_Cuiso■.1 BECRlISE dF --k-tF_ 11m coultm&NESS

Tb DiscLosE GmfaibENliriL SOURCES "

DIcKERzsoN'A \I. nE_PT. OFCTUSTICE. cfcla 1.2c1 "Mb (6N ciP. Ici93)

-DAL L'A2t6MEAPV xS No LoM6ER 1)tF_ PEOPLE . Its (STA ram FEbEpiAL) RE FuSPL 1-1.1 I) LS Cl_o&c-_ Acylot oF "TivizoRinATID ,\\, CI)TTtrr_Sti 1)T 1P00)AYER Exi'Eq.sE., LETS Mt 6UILT'1' Go f REE, INC_NXERPO'ES 1)VE,_ ins,WC.Er\IT, AWNS Ac FI6ETS, VFRPETeArF F-ma PF RPETun c 1N1-1.511.1FoiZmNi131\1., D-LSINIFLIMATri-Jr:,, HALF- Thtfilis, CovER.JP3, FPAuots Fc■to ANn

DELLifir“E i\iFUSIOQ

11\1.0 ht RE IS No 9EtiTER ExAm E -NAK1 Tyt. h RIO - -2ANI mAilfa

0 SWALIN- .1cribtrIENITiL CAERUP5 ; PICillut361-1 UI1AL FAr_~ Arses 14ccuRF,TE._ TNIFoRrrsrtrar:3 LTS At\lo OFTEN AUAILA21

71-1L,NA To ,AV of h i)ROVENI, H1.Lf4 (..EV EL, ?1,-6 Pc/LuERF/-) Cu r\..S PERA-c.Y.

1-11L bAckit 2_AtNa. poi; cER. 111F_ GSLunuS-JfK 1»t)ITER, Ann obti-IR mAlTEQS e-YS WELL.)

MACSE it RE FA rYtiLLAR tut -hi Ni 0..StuAL3 mn iTE r ar it S F G rn ENT of HLSTGPV, KticAu "ME NinrnE RCHiiQ CASE NAG ELL . rY1i2c1-1 Has EFEN‘ jPr TEN

PIMul NNCELL, His CokluLcTioNl IN E. (ifLbErAL) Disi-Picroe I E)0t5_., /PO ME_ U.S.Go DIIEFOTS TO SILENCE NIM Aru " PO r H ALM t--)i.k.;() " coniL IN 71-iiNoS tiE6UT NACELL FIRE IPREFUTA6LE. LuilEM M. U.S. CovEegrytENT tirULEJ_ NRGELL 1D Cot:M-111E1 SA -lb I1LEt3 6Er 11.1M. ;4%0 Dill.

1.UHEirA ItE CwatilDIAIEs\IT FIRULED mE_ 71) CouR-r, MEI PAUSED, As\II) Sfilb Its T. LEIS GLI-td Atvl ARE_ PuNis■at\IG IT NEVE_CA 11 Ritz t•fEtiER isJrt.1_ 6ET OW/ IMEAVIE(: 711,3. ill RT.

C -- 5 )

WAS A FE6EPAL Cill_mtwAL CAPIML CHAP6E .B1:0061-1 t IN ic(L) LEN ME_ S o U MECKI bISTRIcT oF TEX 115., CRP, RLS Dlvr_sloN,. -NtE I-ELL LS stki•Ruc ReColZo O.

11E_ OISE (LAS Oczt<i:NALL,/ i)sSIGNFLI Ti.) ac..)n6f_ CILIA CCX Ahv_.- U.S. froas -rofcrE, DE ASC. S ,inE3 C ttf.D.) THE UNITEb STMES F ArnER_1-Cri kt,PlEe-r ai.,■SEPN 11-1E CMSE aJFIS

DIR J Ei1T 4.110PNEIS WERE mE. IN C-X0- 31 ; THE. LAS T (-,rvE Lutis REcYloufM by niE CduRT o N.1 TtiLi

rY)F3oR fiEfaPINL- LuAS HELL, cr.! JUL'i „ Lut11-1 aDGE J-ANIEs DE AMY) CEPowW5\11i1a- 11ouS1-0.0 PRF CT DING, rat-to JOHN R. CoPR,~if~owN~VILLE1 Hs P-r- RE Pc to TEP

-1QrScRLPT--PREE

S3 I 1:30ULD STRoNIGLY CJRGE_YoL) - TO PE'Offur PRESENT CcUNLStl_ C_f_>••■.111-NiUi.l. REPPEENITINC, Vol]. NuT IF luiJ GE r G.:)..ivIc•Tri) 'lot) I-1RE E.E iliF_UNE. Wit IS G6Li\i6 To Do litE TIME PAn NJ thin. SD -/cuilnvE A P1.6111- UNDER 6-iNSTITUa)N1 Tv RE_PRESENIT

NktiMELF IP Yot.) WISH ...,

111E_ 'TPrt,l_C fan - F1 tElo

1 WANT- TO REPRESENT mYSELF, 1-1ANc\S DaLLIN. ict.) CtRE Yckila cLusl R iToONE.Y. "

-Pric_ INN:t.S[ izs P r - rraGE g

louR DECO um IN TrIE CSRT-coorY) it r■S PIEW couPIELitiS, win N AGREE ci71t YoUR_ DE_CicietK,Try REPPESENT -kuesELF. BUT DIE NJ TTIAT Do.ESN'T MEAN PIN; ittLNG EACEPT 30S-t- 031SA6PEE AEour THAT: "

FRorTilfir PcdNiT 0 ‘\\0, PlciaewEY LLAS (sfGNfr) TO C-So -51-S . LN\ DECENthER c1F I9\1

Why CAUSE. (SCE_ Try GAJRT RECueDS, 3161\■EL El ac,c,c HErib.) Ir uinS SEConin

T1_,NAE SAR,)moNilltS PRo E. IN\ GoRT MAL.a\YST T)w L'Arrren 5T/Irs cF NER_Lto.

It -h CURT

" DEFfiNDqNfT 11-1E_CouP.T

C.AdRr

CcA,EQ.)

AT T11nv Poi-N1TZ i3ECAME, ANL) APPA PEN TLV STILL AM, 1-1-E_ ONLY LI vIN16,-- NON - LAWYEP r-\ MERICAN\ CouT of A(vo miLtioN't iiKAT'ul DUALS) (1,110 HAs (UoNJ 7'i rf. of. RAL CAP_TIAL CftSE., SANS CoUIZSEL . No A FoRNEY LLTIATS&EUEP.

SET N AQV r, (uoR.C.) ALoLYT -NrIT RP?EhREL) IN M MELIA . LL,t-IYN6T? ESiECIALLY F)FTER F\LL Trf._ REIR.TAL PRINTED rsAALAPK-E!. CouRT- R'ECoRnS 'TELL ThEik) owN ST"o2Y,' .A(:T SorAE. MUC h PREFER To ACCEPT- Tri.E ILLUSION ANn DIF_NY T-)-t.E RE ALT TY,

-THL REN_ill IT1hT ONCE 1'1C t_NITEL) STATES CF NnERIcR G)ISCdutREn 1)-InT L LuAS 6oINC, To Ru (Ns -NE CUE, RNA TESTI FY, TES TI FY Ftiu_V, FrsieLi aPENLY, i UMW FPFEL); RS iTIE LfIsUs) REQUIRES — GoVEN\ImENcT -1.1RhsTh T iL PcNr0 RfNI FcP Co vEP. THEY FLEL T ScENE. ZIIRUE FsEEJNA j'l LL,RIS Lt,i/ERE iliF_JUD&L (Nkiernotlii Two /op T)-E.

SECuTuR /DIZ TR_TL1 Tc) IlLoc U_InniNATE,O SEVERELY (.1")Yar Y "F_Siamo OP IS ME KEY (cuR3, ALLuAls HAS 1-1Lit:nYS WILL Be ,

sad. "rim-y•.f, A VEPV OqER RATE), OVEPOE..3 LLio Ea) fY_S-n2/ 1,)/ 7)-fp_ GovERNYNnEssrc bioN T faK, EYE. NuSE iLtd..7 RICI)RP.D N1R6ELL) 1 DIANIAL

R 'EEC A 1$L PR LSD) ENT or A SOV ERr& CU nQY WI Tit LO RD_`? aF Hi6 Leg L S CRF N.s.z IDLLAN's liaLSok, 1)o ,lug kt 1 Cut-10 LUIS /LS CtiVf21\i‘rafr 1):L'im 6A T Acv t1E N.Lt) c)RoSECultb HIM SEvETPIL TEMLS! Rc INIF3N.I7tY1'1 . CVIEPAMEnfr SAID " UdE_LI,V1.1mL TES- )1_NtNY, SPEnic FREELY! " 4, m H fuR 6REYmait_.

fluT THENS 1. SrkIiQ -11.\ VESE Rr3L Lurrr ► 4c T1 LvEeWAEKT STh RiS .70 Si LET nrin C.z) &Thin. 11c md; 11i ti(cEs inc PAA6

1;<1 FINki CME., -Mf11- tietSmV NAmE. Lti LT, oR Cf■pyaNAL., You SEN) kV. RE N\ 1)-tf RECc.)e,0 10 SEE_ WHO IS TOYING To RLoci:" Po)/ "TiLs-ame P1/4,/ Ic'FfP m E ()tic oP Cr-4.)R1 Q 8LocKr, s Fk_s_ , PREVENT T_STIfIlor\r"..

-THE FEDERAL CoURT IN 111E 1),JESrEPN, tislracr ciF TE.kiss (AUSTIN --TULLE. NriULJN.)) L. , PiGo DETF_E'rniNE6'k Bloc YES Tfryi:AW riNkr1 11RS LLEL, (31 .1-71E REColan To Oo JUST THAT-. RELLip,Ths FRoryl Nif STolE (cAL CHALLEACE FECIEPpIL ((AMT. 1.1 AUSUNI, 2A NI

CoLli_KI'S, n-cfa-cia-(en (FEDEcp4_, limo& ccApus) PROVE, P,Ekrqo AruI PoSS18LE .1).0tyRy NAT IF iiF*4 BEENS TO TES1TFY r.-T- /NAV STpITE TRIAL , 1 CDULCN NOT HAVE 8c-EN) CLi \aci-En lu ()GE -NAT_ Pt -ci;t-- LSo ES ME41__L Ific C. AL I i_AL- FA ctuRL INNOCENCE, IPF■via Ceti r‘i S TIN.1) I TSELF hisnirss E.3 CfNusE bc), 003 (19,&Z

111.e._STriTE uf- T1CFLS L Q'ocs6eT Jiis EP %AN" 6E CAUSE T PE R.Sory riLLY mnoE rr ri..)oto:, Cciur..7 ukAs GO .0\16 TO TES Ti SIMFLE AS MINT. BALL 9ELENIEATF...3 T1 121- c7a-C('-- L_ATEg, CAUSE. 61,coo, TrAvis CouNilY, f3FTFR CE -1-Ee.,y)Livirv67 °NAY LLA 1 TO Co‘NICI NIL WAS To. ELocr: i c VR.NENIT MY 1ES-1-1MoVY LUAS Dv NE.

TEsiimoKii. ALL PiRoUT TE_SitAlo

C- gD-SI- S

C = C.-z:OPuS CHRISTI KJ= lett) S( = 111E CRSE NlurAISFP. S A SuLSEG,,uENT- /SUPE2CEDN6/ SEC_LAtL) NarCimErv-i-.

-3 - RS 111E rouRT REC(..)3.s SI-101.13 IN\ - S- /boo , DES. n, C. HOLIVIlt, ZANI v. COLLIN'S

-IY\ U.S.S. R. KiLLEL. cR NiTf )13% Rio Ada G.6.1 Atkicv/ Lurh-1 1T. IF IN DIVT_ DUALS am DIE_ FE DE RrZL AN3 STAlt (cVE eN rYl E NT5 D is NeT ErrnER. KKJet_ii o SeLrEVE raNn

ry-IcRE, -11.\cLUOIN1E5 (RUT sJor [AMT. TEL) To) ii±ESTRoNIC; EJELIEF 7)-frYr RAP:zo- Zf\i" FALSE (1-i A oCES ANN CcA1FQUP.S APE TW_AnSELVES RELAT'En To NE PL'iVi-CaunLi-JFK- '`‘)RITEQ CoveC'OP/CuNL PIRACY, to .Vo13 DIT_Nr CyufemmEN-r- LuoGi_miFwE._ 1-U0s11' TA3- Po‘n RrNN1, VoQ TT5 LIFE_ L,LlEts.1, iT gf CnrmF_ AWARE_ L curls. (3o-ii\f6 To ku C- Sr- 3 i7+ N3

DRuP n CAPITAL CASE AND FLEE? ENE EXACT SPME IS TRUE OF TRAVIS CourNITY, Lui\IcI1 Gt\IL FLEL OUT FEAR cF nrlY TFSTIMoNIV FkisCO H is:1g gtAi ThE okLY L.t,AY CC, LiLE: Fr\t_s ELocr. MW ELLE(' Co ReuP7R21, DIA lib sTei -ILL; Hi'w AN,/ i nE AN/ Jb86,6_s. Sin FE nrvin FEcEEPL-- CC RT RECcAn Sr1Cl,J 1-1fru'F_ irOcF_M A Pr_itliCIER. IN TYtE 2A,E,LE mAn6z 0 \Os- IS AnQS, ? nilSoLuif_L/ ShocicrN6 . C6 e P raA fut. his 1-10NEs TEn_. -maws ARE -NESE PEoPt_E DEDICnTF.1) -10 1-1 -LoING _ To Cc) \JERI:MG UP

0 (NE- UA1OSE NMAE_ EVER Fvfe.) RE EN1 rAF.NiTIolvEn PELF 1)-1L b;R.ro CeSE, uk/ - C_SLua.L, iF K , AN() A ce:OPLE 1711:R trasEs 1-1FIS ANi rq& E VEN3 RE_ INN oTELV cLoVL To Soc. 1A A COURT RE CoP.O M I Co. Awo FoR Goon PEt5oi\S • -Dif P,§1 r•noRE 1IRLE 1t DoZE.J.\ CouRT REGDPIIS ARc,uND, JUST l cP inoRE SHockTN.16-, DutlF_N\ SIUMIL) CNE FuLLY. 1. G. 2 IANL \I .C6LL ti\JS A-qa- CA- C5e, U,S, D. C, AUStr_Nl, SlEzNI DisTkici TEms, 2ANT_ \) LuILLtAmS ,)1 -CA, U.S. D. C, WEC1€.C2.1\1 IX.Sier.croPIEmS, ETC.

IF ILu 1\16-c RtRi3 E (DIct 0 F GNICeE.S.S.IorvAL RECaY) c 1 ILA PUIIPV Ito 1 6191, -Jut) 5:1-}01.1u2). HELPFUL. -(1.\ CRAP:1o) SPEECH LuA.S MADE ASoLIT

nr-TER —RIE TRIAL oil 11-8>S- h:Lo, U,& 2iwr. \ • Cu I TVS '+ —S, V;E_eY vU if 1?Esni.6.

WiLLT-267AtzE., &MET MENT FEfiD l.ATib A PULLET SURPRISE, ffRO, P,A-61tC6 ProKS of 11xAs., Irk En CT tA)Rolil ii t_rEEL- SLANCIF7t? rok/EPUP -nizs Ew-aRF mniTERALAIILIA --u.\\CLui>F_S TOE_ PALA:1)ER of: Antuo (Cut..6cESSIcA/AL RFCcgia) r4rwi) -111n-s's 1-1uL3 AT,n ImPoolAnn- rr

11PsT'~ BUST cu ii/ G...'vEcK,mENn- 7cuicE_ k LE rpa„, Ccut,,Tocoin. Coisu: OEN; Nr_s tiP moRRoui kal; I Vii frinfie_p_s

2E1\b1+.1(.1 t5P FuRe TNI TrtEie Tte'/ Wow -r-.; /ARE ScARW.

C,C)K_Sf).E cl Pt Nnc.-1 orvf ek..ISFn tvNn rY\ISUI■ ZF os-r-cflo u_x)121), Ph R acuuNeLi r -7-.5 .EC,Ftt_ DE FIN]: Tr_c_,N)

7N1 (

cPPosFn CNE GENEM_Y 11- 1NrS. Uu t1 AT buLS \E _FLo

ci=s-/ ?

" AchiouGli IT' TAKES Two To Cu KIsPi PE, Pr PLIDIEN-TIFF E;ES Kier HovE TO POOVL (AJT_A"-1 iiitiornDE FENIMNIT G.AISPIREL), ifE_ NEEL) 0\JLY PPOVIE. IJA-r- _OF FFN:u3ANIT Zrc.)INEI CcEEr Wirr nLLEGF,r)„ NOT -1)-1-E "

cfD14- 2_1 13 ,R S. (7 i)-1 cre,

GivER) Nie

L--.

a cbt.51)T RATc.) PIRE. RESPON1siaLE foR n c_Th mrYIIITEL) Q,Y coco NISP PAToRS Fuv.) Tck€RANca a4= n(qs- Pro;c1 "

O. S, v. PR R , 611 ) L1 313 C-271t CI P, 19%)

3 CIS! CL,PC15-1 RNis f1L EVLDEUCF IS SUFFICIENT IU PPLNE irtE Ex.r_siENcE. OF rs, CLA SPi-Arvg, (IN RGREEmENT- MA/ &F IN FEU'F/ F1?Uryl ComcERT dr A c-cccA,, AntIoNIG rrte_ ALtEGF./R ti.1 CI PANTS. A 1i oLuNJ Tr.eY Pm iz uci Pn no rnrvi FESTen FR6rn A Cale, CA TTati 0f CiTadYISTANCES, U.S. ■1 6110 rh) 5111 CreCidir, iqc/0/)

13CCryt• id

r2e)EE RT 2ANi_ No. 3 .Zgcf3S rylL0-) /qt. tsurr, 8b-90

J, iSosk 4-Snn TENI■ESsEE_. CoLokr/, TE ms. 7s gk6

on -mn AP (IL_ 14%.

000,4,,AVT,9.0,4'ii0KTOAL^-WV:wi0, • 4.! '4 'VW " o

L es " •":;,`

CY) —

lea

PI%

PINN lag

ilk

kia tr'd

ni

. . . . • . • .