Generation and Detection of Atomic Spin Entanglement in Optical Lattices

H.-N. Dai, B. Yang, A. Reingruber, X.-F. Xu, X. Jiang, Y.-A. Chen, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan

Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany

Motivation

Outlook

Funding

Reference:

* B. Vaucher, et. al. New J. Phys. 10, 023005 (2008).§ S. Trotzky, et. al. Science, 319, 295 (2008).† B. Paredes and I. Bloch, Phys. Rev. A. 77, 023603 (2008).‡ A. Y. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. 303, 2 (2003).

Detecting Spin Entanglement

𝑃↓↓ =𝑁𝑡𝑜𝑡 − 𝑁1 − 𝑁2

𝑁𝑡𝑜𝑡

• Measuring Spin Correlations

𝐸𝑧𝑧 = 𝜎𝐿𝑧 ⊗ 𝜎𝑅

𝑧

= 𝑃↑↑ − 𝑃↑↓ − 𝑃↓↑ + 𝑃↓↓

𝐸𝑦𝑦 = 𝜎𝐿𝑦

⊗ 𝜎𝑅𝑦

= −𝑃++ + 𝑃+− + 𝑃−+ − 𝑃−−

• Lower bound of Fidelity

𝐹 ≥ − 𝐸𝑧𝑧 + 𝐸𝑦𝑦 = 0.79(6)

• Violation of Bell’s inequality

𝑆 = 2.21 ± 0.08 > 2

• Extending to two-dimensional spin-dependent superlattices;

• Measuring Four-Spin Ring-Exchange interactions† 𝑺𝟏𝒙𝑺𝟐

𝒙𝑺𝟑𝒙𝑺𝟒

𝒙;

• Simulating a minimal instance of Toric code model‡;

• Scaling up the two-dimensional quantum states; …

arXiv : 1602.05709

arXiv : 1507.05937

Jex =4 J 2/U

τ ~ 120(5) ms

τ ~ 2 s

Spin-dependent Addressing

Δ Δ

• Spin-dependent Superlattice

• Effective Local Gradient B Field

Two-body State Detection

• Hyperfine changing collisional loss• “Site-Resolved” Addressing

L R

𝜔𝐿 ≠ 𝜔𝑅

F = 2, mF = − 1

eff. > 98%

Generating Spin Entanglement

• SWAP - gate • Two-Step Filtering Sequence

①

②

③

④

⑤

① Imaging ↑ , get 𝑁1;

③ Merging double wells;

⑤ Imaging rest atoms, get 𝑁2.

② ↑ ⇒ ↑′ by adiabatic passage;

④ Two body collisional loss;

𝑵𝟏

𝑵𝟐

First initializing the system from a Mott filling state ↓, ↓ to ↓, ↑ , then letting the system evolve a quarter period of superexchangeprocess,

↓, ↑ ⟹ ↓, ↑ + 𝑖 ↑, ↓

2

• Control Entangled Phase

𝑡 =1

2 ↓, ↑ + ↑, ↓

𝜋/2 1

2 ↓, ↓ + ↑, ↑

𝑠 =1

2 ↓, ↑ − ↑, ↓

𝜋/2 𝑠

𝜙 𝑡 = 𝜙0 + Δ 𝑡/ℏ

↓, ↑ + 𝑒𝑖𝜙 𝑡 ↑, ↓

2

𝑡TSFS.

0𝜋/2

𝑠TSFS. 𝑁𝑡𝑜𝑡

2

𝜋/2

Singlet-Triplet Oscillation

Two-body Measurement

Experimental Setup

𝑉 𝑥 = 𝑉𝑥𝑠𝐶𝑜𝑠2 2𝑘𝑥 + 𝑉𝑥𝑙𝐶𝑜𝑠2 𝑘𝑥

𝑉 𝑦 = 𝑉𝑦𝑠𝐶𝑜𝑠2 2𝑘𝑥

𝑉 𝑧 = 𝑉𝑧𝐶𝑜𝑠2 2𝑘𝑧𝑥

Ultracold atoms in an optical lattice have excellent coherence properties and can be manipulated in parallel. It is attractive to create resilient entangled states for measurement-based quantum computation in optical lattices*.

Although the entangled spin pairs can be created during the dynamical evolution of spin pairs driven by exchange interactions§, it was not possible to directly verify the entanglement by measuring the spin correlations until now.

• Single layer of atoms

• in-situ imaging (N.A.=0.48)

87Rb𝜆𝑠 = 767 𝑛𝑚𝜆𝑙 = 1534 𝑛𝑚𝑑 = 4 𝜇𝑚

𝐽/𝑈 ≈ 0.04

Towards Scalable Quantum Computing

𝑡