Upload
daniel-fox
View
254
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Geneva Declaration (2014) Reconfirms GEO’s guiding principles Resolves to improve the effectiveness of GEO’s actions Welcomes additional participants, particularly UN Resolves to engage with development banks, foundations, and the private sector Resolves to develop a specific and strengthened framework for sustained resource commitments
Citation preview
GEO Strategic Plan 2016-2025:Implementing GEOSS
Jörn HoffmannGEO Implementation Plan Working Group November 11th, 2015, Ciudad de México
“Renew the mandate of GEO through 2025…”
“Establish a process to facilitate a seamless transition for GEO through 2025, and request that a new Implementation Plan through 2025 be prepared for endorsement at the next GEO Ministerial Summit”
Geneva Declaration, January 2014
GEO Summit 2014
The Geneva Declaration (2014)
• Reconfirms GEO’s guiding principles
• Resolves to improve the effectiveness of GEO’s actions
• Welcomes additional participants, particularly UN
• Resolves to engage with development banks,
foundations, and the private sector
• Resolves to develop a specific and strengthened
framework for sustained resource commitments
GEO Summit 2014: Guidance• Renew GEO and implementation of GEOSS until 2025
• Coordinate EO strategies, collaborate with existing initiatives
• Promote access, strengthen networks, identify needs
• Foster global initiatives
• Review Societal Benefit Areas
• Promote and implement Data Sharing Principles
• Governance: Maintain intergovernmental nature and explore stronger role of Participating Organizations and GEOSEC
• Renew effort to engage with private sector
• Strengthen framework for steady resource committments
• Prepare a draft Implementation Plan and Reference Document
• Call upon theGEO Community
• Report to ExCom, GEO-XI and GEO-XII Plenaries
Islam Abou El-MagdBob ScholesMahamadou S. KeitaTsehai WoldaiNoureddine Filali Boubrahmi
IPWG MandateDanielle LacasseYana GevorgyanOscar RodasLuciano Pezzi Julio Castillo
Toshio KoikeStuart Anthony MinchinGu XingfaHiroyuki MuraokaZhou Xiang
Victor SapritskyLyudmila ShardakovaMr. Sukhrob OlimovZoya AndreevaAndrey Emeliyanov
Jörn HoffmannAlan EdwardsTim HaighJosé Maria Marcos EspinosaEleni Christia
Process and Milestones Timeline
April 2014IPWG
convened
June 2014Report to ExCom
November 2014 Report to Plenary
March 2015Report to
Excom
May 2015 GEO Work Plan
Symposium
September 2015 Report to
Excom
July 2015 Report to ExCom
February 2015 UN Workshop
December 2014Private Sector at World Bank
February 2015 Commercial
sector at ESRI World Conference
May 2015Asian community
at Tokyo Symposium
May 2015 Applied
Community at ISRSE Conference
November 2015 Report to
Plenary
A new Strategic Plan: Why
Technologychange
Policy change
Policy Framework• Sustainable Development Goals• Sendai Framework for DRR• Aichi Biodiversity Targets • …
A new Strategic Plan: Why
New activitiesCommunity
Remaining gapsNew Members,
PO
Lessons learned
Lessons learned: What worked well
Valuable meeting place Maintain GEO as flexible framework for cooperation Convening power
Success of global initiatives Build on Initiative model
Valuable impact on Data Sharing
Maintain and strengthen role; extend to data management
SBA useful concept, but room for improved definition
Revise Societal Benefit Areas
Lessons learned: Need for changeRecurrent shortage of resources for GEO activities
Introduce Implementation Mechanisms; improve management through GEO Work Programme
Need to clarify “ownership” of activities
Irregular and uneven follow-up of commitment to GEO activities
Implementation Mechanism give• due visibility and ownership to
contributors• appropriate roles to Members and PO
who (may want to) contribute
Inefficiencies criticized; have led to some frustration and disengagement
Improve management and introduce Implementation Mechanisms
Ineffective link between Governance (Plenary/ExCom) and implementation level
Implement Governance Principles and introduce GEO Programme Board
The two parts of the Strategic Plan
Strategy
• GEO Vision• GEO Mission• Strategic Objectives• Scope
Implementation Plan
• GEOSS evolution• Data Sharing and Data
Management• Engagement• Core Functions• Impl. Mechanisms• GEO Work Programme• Governance• Resources
What stays the same• GEO Vision: to realize a future wherein decisions and actions
for the benefit of humankind are informed by coordinated, comprehensive and sustained Earth observations and information. Group on Earth Observations, 2005
• GEO‘s voluntary and intergovernmental nature
• GEO‘s open community
• GEOSS and GEO‘s principles
What’s new:Strategic Plan provides a framework
• Implementation detail is in GEO Work Programme
• High-level Strategic Objectives:
Advocate to provide maximum value in support of achieving national and international policy objectives
Engage to address global and regional challenges
Deliver to improve decision-making
• Core Functions to scope GEO activities
• Detailed objectives and targets apply to GEO activities
What’s new:Core Functions scope what GEO does
1. Identifying needs and addressing gaps
2. Sustaining foundational observations and data
3. Fostering partnership and mobilize resources
4. Advancing GEOSS, Data Management and Sharing
5. Implementing sustained global and regional services
6. Cultivating awareness, building capacity and promoting innovation
What’s new:Strengthened Societal Benefit Areas
• SBA are „windows“ for different user communites
• Strongly application-oriented
• Used to structure identification of user needs and gap analyses
Societal Benefit Areas
Disaster Resilience
Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture
Water Resources Management
Sustainable Urban Development
Energy and Mineral Resources Management
Public Health Surveillance
Biodiversity andEcosystem Sustainability
Infrastructure and Transportation Management
Climate is cutting across all SBAs
What’s new:Improved effectiveness and efficiency
• Implementation Mechanisms allow to distinguish handling of different „Tasks“
• Programme Board and Work Programme:
• Members and PO agree on implementation priorities
• Alignment of ambition and available resources
• Reports for GEO compiled by GEOSEC
• Limit additional reporting for GEO by implementors
Page 18
Implementation Mechanisms
Foundational TasksData Sharing actionsFrequency protection
GEOSS Portal
Community Activities Initiative Flagship
- flexible
- bottom-up
- often small-scale
- Implementation plan
- resourced
- partners commitment
What’s new:More ownership by Members and PO
• Programme Board (16-32 members, 40-60% PO)
• Allow contributing Members and PO to engage in discussions and decisions of GEO‘s implementation
• Implementation mechanisms provide for clear and appropriate roles
• Three Participating Organizations observers in ExCom
• Enlarged ExCom with easier rotation
Going forward
Legal statusExplore options, including independent legal status, to enable GEO participation in other international bodies and undertake financial and contractual transactions
ResourcingExplore mechanisms to achieve greater financial stability.
Role of the private sector- Actively engage private sector in GEOSS- Consider how private sector should best be engaged in decisions
Filling the new structures and mechanisms with life- Careful transition steered by ExCom- Conducting the Programme Board with due diligence- GEOSEC to assume its new implementing roles (see Work Programme)
Summary and conclusions
• IPWG has completed its task to develop an Implementation Plan (and Reference Document).
• The Plan responds to guidance, input and commentary in a balanced way, while aiming to be suffiently consensual.
• The Strategic Plan provides a framework. GEO Members and Participating Organizations need to engage to make it work.
22
Thank you!
Guidance: GEO-XI
• Accepted Strategic Objectives and Core Functions – scope of GEO activities
• Agreed to revise SBAs
• Management:
• Implementation Mechanisms supported, but reduce number
• Stronger role for GEOSEC
• Avoid burdensome reporting
• Broadly agreed to Work Programme Concept
Guidance: GEO-XI
• Governance:
• Maintain intergovernmental nature (no PO decision at Plenary & ExCom)
• Supported formal delegation, Plenary oversight and clear mandates provided
• Strengthen role of PO
• PO may be observers in ExCom
• Stronger role in implementation level
• Cautious reaction to indicative scale of contributions
IPWG documents
• GEO Strategic Plan 2016-2025: Implementing GEOSS
• Part A: Strategy• Part B: Implementation
• Reference Document• GEOSS Description• GEOSS Data Management Principles• Core Functions: Monitoring, Evaluation, Expected
Results and Indicators• Implementation Mechanisms• GEO Work Programme Development• GEO Communications and Engagement Strategy
Document MS4
Document 11
Other relevant documents
• Mexico City Draft Declaration
• Updates to Rules of Procedure
• Transition Plan
• 2016 Work Programme
Document MS2
Document 17
Document 12
Document 15