D.D.H. GEOMAN sac****** 2-1*225 ELL.OTT 010

GEOLOGICAL REPORT

ON THE

COASTORO RESOURCES LTD.

48 MINERAL CLAIM GROUP

LOCATED AT

ELLIOTT TOWNSHIP

DISTRICT OF COCHRANE

NORTHEASTERN ONTARIO

LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

LATITUDE 48 e 26' NORTH

LONGITUDE 79 0 46' WEST

FOR

COASTORO RESOURCES LTD.

422-470 Granville Street

Vancouver, B.C.

V6C 1V51 RECEIVED.

JUL 22 W

MINING IMW* 8BIW*

A.D. DRUMMOND, Ph.D.,P.Eng.

July 13, 1987

422 - 470 Granville Street, Vancouver, B.C. Canncla V6C l V5 * Telephone (604) 681-4413

3aoesNwae76 z.\ eaas ELL iOTT 010C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION

LOCATION AND ACCESS

PROPERTY AND TITLE

PREVIOUS WORK

REGIONAL GEOLOGY

PROPERTY GEOLOGY

COMMENTS ON SURFICIAL COVER

CERTIFICATE

REFERENCES

3

5

5

7

7

9

9

12

16

18

ILLUSTRATIONS

FIGURE 1: LOCATION MAP

FIGURE 2: CLAIM MAP

FIGURE 3: REGIONAL GEOLOGY

FIGURE 4: PROPERTY GEOLOGY

FIGURE 5: GEOLOGICAL -CROSS-SECTION (LINE 4+OOW)

6

8

10

(IN POCKET)

13

-3-

SUMMARY

A group of 48 mining claims in Elliott Township has been

acquired by Coastoro Resources Ltd. This property, in

northeastern Ontario, is located about 35 kilometres north

of Kirkland Lake. Highway 101, an east-west trending

artery, is situated north of the property. Old logging

roads, about 14 kilometres long, provide access to the

north sector of the property.

A new road between Kirkland Lake and Highway 101 has been

constructed by the provincial government to facilitate

mining exploration in the area. Completed in late 1986,

this road passes near the west boundary of the Coastoro

property.

The claim group is underlain by Kinojevis Group volcanics,

a 10,000 metre succession which strikes northearsterly

and dips vertically or steeply south. To the north, the

Kinojevis Group is bounded by the Porcupine-Destor fault,

a major structure spatially if not genetically related

to numerous gold deposits along its 300 kilomtre length.

Barrick Resources are presently sinking a shaft for under

ground work on their 1.3 million ton deposit adjacent

to the Porcupine-Destor fault eight kilometres north of

Coastoro.

The claim group is extensively drift-covered, but there

are sufficient outcrops to define the main geological

features of the claim group. Northwesterly trending mag

nesium and iron-rich tholeiitic lavas and pillows were

noted with interlayered hyaloclastic units. Tops were

noted to face south. In addition to the geological mapping,

-4-

three (3) -45 0 BQ diamond drill holes were completed on

Line 4+OOW at 35+OOS (87-1), 31+50S (87-2) and 28+OOS

(87-3). Comparing the geological section from the drill holes and the rock distribution from the mapping, there

is an offset fault of unknown displacement which trends parallel to Grid Line 18+OOW. Further drilling will be

required to determine the significance of this offset

structure.

-5-

INTRODUCTION

Coastoro Resources Ltd. has requested a review of its

Elliott township property, northeastern Ontario to determine

a suitable exploration program. To that end, the writer geologically mapped the property during the period October 16th to 31st, 1986 and 1500 feet of BQ diamond drilling

were completed during the period of May 1987.

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The 48 mineral claim group of Coastoro Resources Ltd. is situated in the northeast corner of Elliott township.

Elliott township is located approximately 115 and 35 kilo

metres from Timmins and Kirkland Lake respectively (see Figure 1). Coordinates are 48 0 26'N and 79 C 46'W.

A truck road south from Highwfay 101 in the north part

of Harker Township provides access to the north boundary

of the Coastoro property. From Highway 101, a major east-

west artery in northeastern Ontario, the truck road is

about 14 kilometres long.

The Ontario government has constructed a Mineral Access

Road between Kirkland Lake and Highway 101. This road

passes through the centre of Elliott township near the west boundary of the Coastoro property. Gravel from a

pit on the subject claims was used as road base consequently,

there is two-wheel drive vehicle access to the claims.

GARRISON

COASTORO

RESOURCES

LTD.

FIGURE lTHACKERAY

C*ml*c*

•7*-

KEY MAP * ""A-S* !

r" xife^i -C

i A. U. DRUfMlih-JU 5jb.-;

OOLO IONC (g

HiM**t*rr kw no* :r.v.-"

S*lftH4* MkMftbllHM (J)

OOMMM* *f* M* "o

101 -~

LOCATION OF

ELLIOTT TWP

CLAIM GROUP

HARKER - MOaOWAY GOLD AREA

HARKCM, CLLtOTT. THACKERAYAND tARRISON TOWNSHIPS

LAROCR IAKC MINIMI 01 VISIONDISTRICT Of COCHRAM!. ONTARIO

M^^^^^H*""

tltU llxk W NW HW____

-7-

PROPERTY AND TITLE

The Coastoro property consists of 48 contiguous unpatented

mining claims in Elliott township having expiry dates

described as follows (see Figure 2)i

L667068 to L667838 to L667846 to L738902 L738905 to L738910 L821800 to L821820 to L822328 to

667071 inclusive -667842 inclusive -667848 inclusive -

738908 inclusive -

821808 inclusive -821834 inclusive -822333 inclusive -

Days WorkCompleted

4531419

156

120120120120120120808080

ExpiryDate

Jan.Jan.Jan.Mar.Mar.Mar.Nov.Nov.Dec.

11/8811/8811/8816/8816/8816/8829/8729/8710/87

Coastoro Resources Ltd. acquired a seventy-five (75) percent

interest in the property from 559505 Ontario Ltd.

PREVIOUS WORK

Jensen (1978) reported that the Good Fish Mining Co. Ltd.

held five unpatented claims within the current Coastoro

claim group in 1947. Thirteen separate pits and trenches showed the presence of quartz veins parallel to the strike

of the host volcanic rocks. No assays or further details

are available (Jensen(1978), p. 58).

A group of 18 claims in the north half of the Coastoro

property have recently been covered by ground magnetic

and electromagnetic surveys. This work, conducted by the property vendor, did not reveal any feature which

differs notably from the Ontario Geological Survey (1983)

airborne surveys.

HARKER TWP M. 353

• M • M 10 M

oM.!.rr -^r^^i i/ i i i -' ^^ i* ."t'^Uii'il'yfiyMTi !.."'M

fi fi±.**'*i'

n— -,**FMI .(I'M* IMW! 11* Mil f""'r"T"rc TlVrr ;

llrtrt l(litn **"*" '**'8'* 'M""t " Tt"

". r. i ***** *M* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~! S' 'mur *i*i f"'"1.~ "~ ~ ' ~ ~^ AaJfisu*""' 1 "!1 " "T" T "PT * "-"'"l L "! l * r-^vw™'?"

ttj^jtf^jwl".**. iH^iHtth^?-)'*^!"^**1*'*111*^ ! i :/*fr*v* t--*,i--,\ ii f 1,1 rr-r *. r * ^ '4Hftti***''.^M*iwwl III 'l .Af'I *****^ *- i * ' * ' * i lT i aa, taf '.-t.. uuM* iwy JU..1 'j*4*J3:..c .. t*?P^*2Wjj.fifi.',1iiii llftiiii;

.J...V-- i""'* i* i* i l "- i ' L u ? *- J 0 ~r 1~ . a*S if * i i . /i i .c^*i .jrft,.**iit*',-*n.**rti -.*i' -"" a.^

-. - -. t - - -- -

TOWNSHIP OF ELLIOTT

DISTRICT OF COCHRANE

LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

PLAN NO. M^. 347

A. D. ORUM.VO.'iiJ

o o*CO

2d.H-

-J-JX

•••••'••*

CLIFFORD TWP W. 338

COASTORO RESOURCES LTD.

FIGURE 2

CLAIM MAP

Scale l : 50,000 approx.

-9-

REGIONAL GEOLOGY

Elliott township is located within a vast assemblage of

mainly volcanic and sedimentary rocks, trending easterly

for several hundred kilometres, termed the Abitibi Green

stone Belt.

Particularly nearby major east trending faults, the Abitibi

rocks host gold mineralization as exemplified by the numer

ous past and present producers at Kirkland Lake and Timmins

in Ontario and Val D'Or and Rouyn-Noranda in Quebec.

The east trending Porcupine-Destor fault in the north

sector of Harker township is in proximity to many gold

mines over its 300 kilometre length.

The rocks between the Porcupine-Destor fault (Figure 3)

and the Kirkland Lake - Larder Lake fault to the south

include a super-group of volcanics which forms a large

eastward plunging synclinorium. The youngest rocks of

the synclinorium are the Blake River -Group which overlie the

Kinojevis Group, each about 10,000 metres thick.

The Coastoro property overlies Kinojevis Group volcanics

immediately adjacent to the Blake River Group. The higher

magnetic susceptibilities of the Kinojevis Group volcanics

as contrasted with the Blake River Group enables a precise

placement of the boundary between the two Groups (Figure 3).

PROPERTY GEOLOGY

The Kinojevis Group underlying the Coastoro Resources

Ltd. property, is largely comprised of Mg-rich and Fe-

rich tholeiite flows, pillow lavas and hyaloclastite

all of which strike northeasterly and dip vertically or

steeply south (Figure 4 - Geological Map in pocket).

. UPPER s LAKE ABITIBI

F*u1t

Syndi'M

BAnticline

Conformable conuct

.. J Unconf ormtbl* conuct

I..J Intruclv* conuct

-.-J Abitibi BttHollth

Ottior - ^orcuplnt Complt*

Bltkt Rivtr Group

|:::;| stoughton

Hunltr Min* Oroup

COASTORO RESOURCES LTD.

REGIONAL GEOLOGY

(After On t. Geol. Survey Map 2433)

FIGURE 3

J K. D. OnUMMWG j V c—-—*-""' -

kxss- -^S^-'ggij.

-11-

The rocks have been subdivided into magnesium-rich .tholeiitic basalt (unit l,la in Figure 4) and into iron-rich tholeiitic

basalt (unit 2, 2a in Figure 4). Both flow types, form pillow lavas and massive flows of which the latter may

be separated by hyaloclastic units. On claim 821834,

there is a northwesterly trending fault which offsets

a hyaloclastic unit. To the west of the fault most of

the outcropping rock is massive iron-rich tholeiitic flows

while to the east, there are interlayered pillows tuff

and fragmental units which are lighter in colour, have less magnetic susceptibility and are correlated to the

magnesium-rich tholeiites. It is within these later rocks

on claims 667846 and 667842 that a greater percentage

of sulphies (mostly pyrite with some pyrrhotite) occurs.

Pillow orientation indicated that stratigraphic tops face

south.

During May 1987, R. Yost Drilling Ltd. completed threei

(3) BQ diamond drill holes each of 500 feet length. Co-

codinates are listed below.

Hole No. Location Dip Direction Length (feet) Claim

87-1 35+OOS, 4+OOW -45 325 500 667842

87-2 31+50S, 4+OOW -45 325 500 667842

87-3 28+OOS, 4+OOW -45 325 500 667842 and667846

Drill site locations are plotted on: the : attached geology map. Diamond drill core logs of the three holes are appen

ded.

The detailed geology of the holes is plotted on Figure

5. Stratigraphically the sequence is outlined below.

-12-

Stratigraphic Top (South)

Interval 250' - Mg-rich tholeiite and hyaloclastite

60' - Fe-rich tholeiite and hyaloclastite

120' - Mg-rich tholeiite

80' - Thin flow sequence of Mg-rich and minor

Fe-rich tholeiite

200' - Variolitic flows (Mg- and Fe-rich tholeiite:

mixed with hyaloclastite

210' - Fe-rich tholeiite (predominantly flows

with minor hyaloclastite.

140+ - Mg-rich tholeiite: and hyaloclastite

Comparison of the geological map and the drill section

indicate general agreement along line 4+OOW. The outcrop

is abundant in the area to the north between 8+OOW and

12+OOW but those outcrops are mostly flows. It is probable

that there are more hyaloclastite horizons and that there

are more flow top breccias. The fault trending grid north

at 18+OOW appears to offset the Fe-rich tholeiite band

on the east of the fault to the south on the west side

of the fault. West of the fault, massive Fe-rich tholeiite:

outcrop along a topographic high which can not be followed

east of the fault. Further drill holes in the vicinity

of the fault will be required to determine the nature

and significance of this offset structure.

COMMENTS ON SURFICIAL COVER

During the search for outcrop on the survey grid, the

following types of surficial cover were noted, i.e., presence

of spruce/balsam fir, poplar/birch, alder, cedar swamp,

swamp and beaver ponds (see the five (5) 200 scale maps

which consitute the geological map for the property -

Figure 4 in pocket).

SOOTH.

ift

s?-;

LINE. 4 + 00 WEST MOI

rt)

!00 (M

SCAUL f-

100'

ROCKS.itl b Ft- R.cH THtx-EnTe

le^ Mg- RitH THbttiiTE.

P- B.

sr*ucTo*f

vo/rrt

as. A .

GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION (LINE 4+OOW Through Drill Holes 87-1, -3, -3 (Claims 667842 and 667846) Elliott Township

Figure 5

^GiNF.^ ~-'-'**?f

-14-

North of the baseline from west to east, there is a gentle,

drainage leading to a beaver pond between 20+00 to 22+OON

on line 44W which drains easterly across the claims event

ually draining into the Magusi River in Tannahill town

ship. Along this drainage is an alder fringed swamp in

an area of spruce/fir cover on the west becoming predom

inantly a birch, alder swamp to the east. The beaver

pond at 6+50 to 8 + 50N on line 88W is fringed by cedar

and alder in a westerly drainage.

South of the baseline, there is a topographic high trending

east-northeast from claims 821807, 821808 on the west

to 667842 on the east. The gravel pit on claim 821824

lies at an elevation of approximately 1,150 feet at the

western limit of the highest part of the ridge. The ridge

is mostly covered with birch, spruce and fir which changes

to poplular /birch and cedar swamp with decreasing elevation.

The southeast portion of the claim group along tie line

35s from west to east is on a gentle east-northeast facing

slope along which spruce, fir and birch changes to a large

alder swamp toward the Tannahill township boundary line.

Respectfully

^y^^TY ———— ^ ^X,'^A. p. Drummond, Ph. D ."7" Geological Engineer

-15-

D.D.H. GEOMANAGEMENT LTD.

CERTIFICATION

I, Arthur Darryl Drummond of the City of Vancouver, Province

of British Columbia, hereby certify as follows:

1. I am a geological engineer residing at 3249 West 35th

Avenue, Vancouver, B.C. and employed by D.D.H. Geoman-

agement Ltd., with an office at 422-470 Granville Street,

Vancouver, B.C.

2. I am a registered Professional Engineer of the Province

of British Columbia, certificate no. 5778. I graduated

from the University of British Columbia in 1959 with

a B.A.Se. in geological engineering, and in 1961 with a M.A.Se. in geological engineering. I graduated

from the University of California in 1966 with a PH.D.

in geology.

3. I have practised my profession continuously for 24

years primarily with the Placer Development Group

of Companies at Craigmont, Endako and Gibraltar mines,

and in mineral exploration in Canada, United States

of America, Chile, Argentina, Mexico and the Philippines.

4. I am the author of this report which is based on pub lished and private reports, and on field examination

of the property during the period October 6th to 31st,

1986 and logging of the core in June, 1987.

422 - 470 Granvillc Street, Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6C 1V5 * Telephone (604) 681-4413

-16-

D.D.H. GEOMANAGEMENT LTD.

5. This report may be utilized for development of the

property, providing that no portion may be used out

of context in such a manner as to convey a meaning

which differs from that set out in the whole.

Dated at Vancouver, B.C., this 13th day of Ju.ly,, 1987.

/A . D . /Drummond , Ph . D .

D. D. H. GEOMANAGEMENT 'LTD.

Geological Engineer

v.. ~""" "

422 - 470 Granville Street, Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6C 1V5 * Telephone (604) 683-4413

-17-

REFERENCES

Bradshaw, R.J. (1986) - Report on the Property of Coastoro Resources Ltd. Elliott Twp., Northeast Ontario: a Prof. Eng. report, dated January 17, 1986.

Jensen, L.S. (1978) - Geology of Thackeray,- Elliott, Tanna hill and Dokis Townships, District of Cochrane: Ont. Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Geological Survey Rept. 165 (Map 2368).

Jensen L.S. and Langford, F.F. (1985) - Geology and Petro genesis of the Archean Abitibi Belt in the Kirkland Lake Area; Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellanious Paper 123, 130 p. Accompanied by Maps P2434 and P2435.

Satterly, J. (1951) - Geology of Harker Township for Ontario Department of Mines.

Scott, Fenton (1985) - Report on the Airborne Geophysical Surveys, Harker and Elliott Townships by H. Ferdeber Geophysics Ltd. for A.E. Perron et. al.

OGS { 1983) - Airborne Electromagnetic and Total Intensity Magnetic Surveys, Elliott and Tannahill Townships, Maps 80609 and 80610.

OGS (1973) - Geological Map 2368 of Elliott and Thackeray Townships.

ODM and Northern Affairs (1973) - Geological Map P705 of Elliott Township.

Ministiy 01 nufjuiLw. . *~,,. Northern Developmentand Mines (Geophysical, Geological,

Ontario Geochrmicai ancl Expr.Muiiunv"

(L/ 1^ c^ c /9-xl-Claim Holncr(s)

32D05NWMI76 3.ie225 ELLIOTT

'f

/C '^C ^ 6-Address

O-' AO *TXJ7 ^oA-'b fc/fST"

Survey Company

"NamTano Address of Auitipr (of Geo-Techmca! report)

Oatc- o 1 Survey 'iron-, c.- xc

/G /c S^ ^Dov MoT v. Da-.

fcU-,,,.Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at righr Mining Cla'm? Traverscci (Us; in numoSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Geophysical D? vs RerClaim

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

- Electromagnetic i

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric ;

- Other !

Geological ,

Geochemical

. Geophysicall Days per

Claim

- Electromagnetic i

- Magnetometer j

Radiometric

Geological

JUL 3 O 138*-Geochemical

Airborne Credits l l Days per

MINING LANDS SECTIONNote: Special provisions ! Electromagnetic

credits do not applyto Airborne Surveys. Magnetometer

Radiometric

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Pertormed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Mininr; ClairrPredx Numner

73 fDays C',

^_^_J__, ,.i ...,., — ^._i

&2J Sit*

St'(?

H

~1

J?-/

1 ota. "..rnber of mining cinims covered by this repo". 0'' work.

yerjuXcatiofi Verifying'Report o^A/orkhereby certify that 1 have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed he work

or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

1362 (85/12)

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Geophyslcal-Geologlcal-Geochemical Technical Data Statement

Ontario

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s).

Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s)

TT

Survey Company.

Author of Report. C. A .Address of Author. S?-Covering Dates of Survey.

Total Miles of Line Cut

/t, /P

32*.(linecutting to office)

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

Electromagnetic.

DAYS per claim

-Other.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provition credit* do not apply to airborne surveys)

thor of Report or Agent

Res. Geol. .Qualifications

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

02-(prefix)

go?

Sbg* **V * * * * * i

tt?

(number)

l

.8&J3.4:..

TOTAL CLAIMS.

637 (85/12)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations ________________________Number of Readings — Station interval ___________________________Line spacing-——.-—.Profile scale____________________________.___——-——————.-—-Contour interval.

Accuracy — Scale constant. WlZo

o

Instrument.

Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ___

ECTROMAGNETK C.n\\ ronfigiiratinn

C.n\] spp;iration

Accuracy.Method: O Fixed transmitter D Shoot back O In line Frequency. ' - - '--- - - ... ..— ...— . . . ...,....— . ,.,,,.~

D Parallel line

(ipecify V.L.F. itation) W

Parameters measured.

Instrument.

Scale constant.Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

z2H <i. '

t*m

e!*tt——

2QCt~)/-l

•—4 t—

^

H^ HCOi— i w Mc*

Method D Time Domain d Frequency DomainPara meters - On tim e Frequency . , . . _ ,, .

Off time Range— Delay tim** ,— intpgrati"" timi"

Power ... ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Electrode array ——————— — —— . ————————————————————————————— ——— — — —————————Electrode spacing —————— - —— . ———————————————————————————— — — — —————————————————

Tvoe of electrode ...,. ———— — — — ——————————————————————————————— - — - —————————

SELF POTENTIALInstrument——————————————————————————————————————— Range.Survey Method ———————————————————————————————————————————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.Values measured.Energy windows (levels) —^^^-^^-——-—-———————————————^™——.-——Height of instrument___________________________Background Count. Size of detector^—————-^^——-———————-————————-—.—————.-.-^-—Overburden ———-————-—-—-—————-—————————————-.^^.^^—..———

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey.^——————————————————Instrument ^——-———————————————————

Accuracy^^—^———————————————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s)———— Instrument(s) ——————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy^———————————^—

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used——-—-—————————————————^—^^..—..——.Sensor altitude.

Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth————— Terrain————————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

D DD

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Others -—-————————————.-———-—.Field Analysis (.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ———————^—

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used ——,

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory.— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used ————

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

General. General .

u A ~

U/D

in

> 2 x^X m :o H

"D OJ

Ol

TA

NN

AH

ILL

TWP

M

, 39

0

enc^.

—

(

- O

i/' ii

i z

c •o N

^

xc

i

rn

Co O

c TD O

rn

•z. O

00

O rn O O o

Q

O

O rn

o O

5O

" C/J —t

z: m

o

o ~n

mn

T

*

± 3

l l

S^

3

S

m

O

m

en

^} r- S > <

v.

O

CO

o

s9

5z

co

>

., Q-

Pm

3'

r--n

O

m

2

?

Do

55

W

co

OO

Z

LO

o 5

5 Z.

^

m

O

S sec

se

m

O

m

:z of*

Li

r B

O -4

m

l —

GridNorth 330 0

SYMBOLSH Hyaloclpitef* Pi l tonpy

of bedding

II located f- tie onClaim Claim Beaver

iron tholeiite

Magnesium tholeiite

KEY MAP

COASTORORESOURCES LTD.

L 821820 L L! O — P R QBE RI YEast

GEOLOGICAL S

ELLIOTT TOWNSHIPLARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

DISTRICT OF COCHRANE, ONTARIO

Tannahi TownshipElliott TownshipScale: l inch to 200 feet

PERRONS'Kirkland Lake Canada

32D95NW*a76 2.1C235 ELLIOTT 220

Mag. N I0 0 W

"S r idNorfh 330 0

SYMBOLSHyalpclastltt H.Pillow structure P.Pyrite pyFault "**A Attitude of bedding

Limit outcrop C?Trench ^Road ::::::'. Trail ••••••••-Claim post a located l tie onClaim line — — —tSpruce , balsam fir * Poplar , birch Beaver pond (^ Creek Swamp ^ AlderCedar swamp

LEGEND

Iron tholeiite

Magnesium tholeiite

KEY MAP

3GARRISON HARKER ;

! \_Barrick

j HOLLOWAY

THACKERAY

COASTORORESOURCES LTD.ELLIOTT PROPERTY

Northeast Sheet

GEOLOGICAL

ELLIOTT ,., LARDER LAKE MINfNG' DIVISION

DISTRICT OF COCHRANE, ONTARIO200 O 200 400 600

Scale: l inch to 200 feet

PERRONS'.Kirkland Lake Canada

Drawn by: Mary Greer Mop No:87-C G-D Dale July____1987

<

Oo

<<

OoOo < < < < < < <

5? 5?

<< <

Oo Oo Oo Oo Oo Oo o o o o OoOo

3aoaSNW0076 2.10225 ELLIOTT230

Mag. N I0 0 W

GridNorth 330 0

H.P.

SYMBOLSHyaloclastite

Pillow structure

Pyrite py

Fault i/tA'v Attitude of beddingf

Limit .outcrop OTrench '-^

Road ::::::: TrailClaim post D located B tie on Claim line — — Spruce , balsam fir ^ Poplar , birch i Beaver pond (^ Creek ~ Swamp k Alder v

Cedar swamp

LEGEND

Iron tholeiitef

Magnesium tholeiite

KEY MAP

GARRISONctr

HARKER :

\ \_Barrick ll HOLLOWAY

if

THACKERAY -ELLIOTT ;

COASTORORESOURCES LTD.ELL O — PROPERTY

Southeast Sheet

GEOLOGICAL

'ELLIOTT TOWNS LARDER LAKE MINING 'DIVISIN

DISTRICT OF COCHRANE, ONTARIO200 O 200 400 600

H

Seal e: l inch to 200 feet

PERRONS'Kirkland Lake Canada

Drawn by: Mary Greer MopNo:87CG-C Dote - July 987

L\738908fi****

^- *

L 821800

32D05NW0376 2.ie225 ELLIOTT 240

Mag. N I0 0 W

Grid

North 330 0

SYMBOLSHyaloclastite H.Pillow structure P. Pyrite fi Fault ^^ Attitude of bedding Limit outcrop CP Trench ^^ Road :::".'/.*. Trail '— "~ Claim post D located B tie on f- Claim line — — —— Spruce , balsam fir ^ Poplar , birch i Beaver pond (^3 Creek —~ Swamp ik Alder Cedar swamp

LEGEND

Iron tholeiite

Magnesium tholeiite

KEY MAP

GARRISON HARKER ;

Bar r/elf*

HOLLOWAY

THACKERAY E L L l O T T

COASTORORESOURCES LTD.ELLIOTT PROPERTY— Northwest Sheet

GEO LO G/CAL(7*-*

ELLIOTT TOWNS* LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

DISTRICT OF COCHRANE, ONTARIO200 O 200 400 600

Scale: l inch to 200 feet

PERRONS'Kirkland Lake Canada

Drawn by: Mary Greer Map IMo:87 C-G-A Dale July 1987

32D05NW0C176 2.18225 ELLIOTT250

Mag. N I0 0 W

GridNorth 330 0

SYMBOLSHyaloclastite R Pillow structure P.Pyrite py Fault "vx /w Attitude of beddingLimit outcrop CJ Trench ^ Road ;:;;::: Trail ••-— Claim post a located m tie on Claim line -— — Spruce , balsam fir l Poplar, birch J Beaver pond ^) Creek ~-Swamp X Alder1 *Cedar swamp*

LEGEND

Iron tholeiite

Magnesium tholeiite

KEY MAP

GARRISONOr.*

HARKER : j HOLLOWAY il

f

'.l PROPERTY

THACKERAY ' •ELLIOTT

COASTORORESOURCES LTD.ELL O— PROPERTY

Southwest Sheet

GEOLOGICAL

ELLIOTT TOWN^NJ LARDER LAKE MINING l

DISTRICT OF COCHRANE, ONTARIO200 O 200 400 600

Scale: l inch to 200 feet

PERRONS'Kirkland Lake Canada

Drown by; Mary Greer Map No: 87 C G-B Date July 1987