Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
42A06NEe375 2.4376 SHAW 010
l:t-;
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
SHAW 12 and #3 GROUPS (Max and Brown-McDade Options)
SHAW TOWNSHIP, Ontario^
Hollinger Argus Limited
RECEIVEDDEC
MINING UNDS SECTION
Tiinmins, Ontario November 17, 1981
J. E. Mountjoy
- l -
^INTRODUCTIONDuring the period from May 20, 1981 to October 16,
1981 geological mapping was carried out over the Brown-McDade
Option (Shaw #3 Group) and the Max Option (Shaw #2 Group), in
Shaw Township. Mapping was completed by the writer with the
able assistance of one student geologist: Robert King.
PROPERTY, LOCATION and ACCESS
The Brown-McDade Option consists of fifteen contig
uous unpatented mining claims, numbered P.451066-P.451068
inclusive, P.539611-P.539617 inclusive and P.539673-P.539677
inclusive. The group is located in portions of lots 9, 10, 11
and 12, Con. VI, Shaw Township, Porcupine Mining Division. The
Max Option consists of 2 patented claims HR1018 and HR1040 in
lots 9 and 10, Con. VI, Shaw Township, Porcupine Mining Division.
The property is easily accessible via an all weather
gravel road from South Porcupine, Ontario.
HISTORY
Numerous trenches have been observed during the mapping
of this property. It is believed that some of these were com
pleted more than fifty years ago as there has been active exp
loration in the area since the early 1900's. In fact the first
staking in Shaw Township was done in 1906.
M and M Porcupine Gold Mines Ltd have filed airborne
magnetometer and electromagnetic surveys in 1965. These surveys
cover a large number of the claims which make up the Brown-McDade
Option.Augdome Corporation Ltd has filed a ground magnetic
survey which covers a large part of claims P.451066, P.451067,
P.539676 and P.539677. Augdome Corporation Ltd has also filed
the results of three diamond drill holes on claim number P.539677
for assessment credits.Hole number one (Aug-1-66) is located approximately
750' south of the 0+00 BL on line 12E. This hole was drilled on
- 2 -
fa bearing of 200O at a dip of -45O for a distance of 362'.
Hole number two (Aug-2-66) is located 975' south of the 0+00
BL, 80' west of line 12E. This hole was drilled on a bearing
of 2000 at a dip of -45O for a distance of 500'. Hole number
three (Aug-3-66) is located 1290' south of the 0+00 BL, 200*
west of line 12E. This hole also was drilled on a bearing of
2000 at a dip of -45O for a distance of 538'. Iron formations
with low gold values were discovered as a result of the diamond
drilling.In 1977 ground electromagnetic and magnetometer
surveys were filed by J.P. Larche for assessment credits on
the J. Helpert property in Shaw Township.
REGIONAL GEOLOGY
The Brown-McDade Option in Shaw Township is located
in the north central portion of a large (approx. 150 sg. Miles)
elliptically shaped geological feature. This feature is made
up primarily of rocks from the Tisdale and Deloro Groups. The
central portion of the elliptical feature is made up of mafic
metavolcanics (massive and pillowed flows). The information
gained from the pillowed flows show the direction of tops to
be away from the centre of the ellipse, thus the theory of a
dome structure. This feature is now referred to as the Shaw
Dome. Moving out from the centre of the dome, intermediate to
felsic pyroclastics and flows of the Deloro Group are found.
As one travels from the centre of the dome one encounters the
younger sequence of rock types from the Tisdale Group. First
rocks of ultramafic composition, then mafic flows, followed
by felsic flows and pyroclastics. Closely associated with
the felsic rocks of the Deloro Group and ultramafic rocks of
the Tisdale Group is a banded iron formation made up of mag
netite, carbonate, chert, pyrite and pyrrhotite. The iron
formation is quite often patchy and discontinuous.
In the central region of the Shaw Dome numerous
outcrops of agglomerate have been mapped, (Carlson, H.D. 1965).
The presence of large clasts suggests a proximal environment
to one or more vents.
- 3 -
Northwest trending faults associated with the
Timiskaming Fault system have been mapped in this region
(Carlson, H.D. 1965). One of these faults cross the claims
under discussion. The Montreal River Fault is located in the
central portion of the Brown-McDade Option. An abandoned
power line was built directly on the fault which trends 321O
as it crosses the Brown-McDade Option. Two other faults cross
the property trend north-south on either side of the Montreal
River Fault while crossing the Brown-McDade Option.
Late stage diabase dykes believed to be of Matachewan
and Keweenawan ages have been mapped in the region (Carlson,
H.D. 1965).
ECONOMIC GEOLOGY
Since the early nineteen hundreds, geological exp
loration has been carried out in this region. The main thrust
of this exploration has been the search for gold although there
has been some interest in the ultramafic rocks of the Shaw Dome
for nickel and to a lesser extent asbestos mineralization.
The two main environments for gold mineralization in
the region which have been most actively explored are quartz
carbonate veins, particularly those near stocks of quartz 'feld
spar porphyry and the sulphide rich, banded iron formation.
The first environment accounts for vittually ali the
gold production in the rocks of the Tisdale Group.
The second environment accounts for most of the inter
esting showings found in the rocks of the Deloro Group, although
trenches have been sunk on quartz carbonate veins. The most
notable of these being the Tommy Burns vein found on the Malga
Property which carries erratic gold values.
The two major showings in the Deloro Group are on
the Malga and Carshaw properties which are both located in
lots l and 2 Con. II, Shaw Township. The main gold bearing
unit in the area is banded iron formation located relatively
close to intrusions of quartz porphyry and the Croteau Creek
Fault.
- 4 .
The iron formations on these properties are locally
contorted and brecciated by drag folding thus opening dilatant
zones for secondary quartz carbonate veining, sulphide mineral
ization and auriferous solutions. Although the iron formation
is well mineralized throughout, gold values are not always present,
but where the secondary veins are mineralized with sulphides
they do carry gold values roughly proportionate to the amount
of sulphide mineralization present. Published tonnages in the
Canadian Mines Handbook reported that the ore reserves for the
Malga property in 1947 was 180,000 tons @ 0.2288 ounces of gold
per ton. While the ore reserves for the Carshaw in 1949 from
the same source was 230,000 tons @ 0.257 ounces of gold per ton.
PROPERTY GEOLOGY
Rock-types and Distribution
The geology of the properties is presented on the
accompanying map (l w*200' or 1:2400)(see back folder). Int
erpretation is based on geological data mapped in outcrop and
ground magnetic patterns. Interpreted geological contacts
are thought to be reasonable but oversimplified. Although there
is a fair amount of outcrop exposure an almost impenetrable
cover of lichens jmakes .it .difficult to recognize contacts. The
effect of the flat dips and changes in topography combine to
produce contacts which do not always correspond with the strike
of the rock units. In 1966 Augdome Corporation Ltd drilled
three holes in the south west portion of the property, these
diamond drill holes were logged by A. Hopkins. The three holes
are plotted on the accompanying map by projecting contacts
vertically.The oldest rock exposed in the map area is a fine
grained intermediate volcanic tuff (A,t) which is light green
to dark green in colour, due to varying amounts of chlorite
alteration and bleaching. This unit exhibits finely laminated
beds and is moderately to highly carbonitized (cc) in numerous
locations. This unit generally strikes SE dipping NE between
480 and 18O .
- 5 -
The overlaying unit is an intermediate pyroclastic
agglomerate (A2agl) that strikes ESE and dips NNE at 31 .
This unit is thin (JJf6') and is well exposed along Dome's gravel
pit road in the north west portion of the map area. The matrix
is fine grained and dark green (chloritic), while the clasts
which range in size from l" to 6", are much lighter in colour. The clasts appear to be homogeneous in composition. Due to the
variance in clast size, between the tuff and the agglomerate one
could envision one source experiencing explosive episodes of
differing intensities or two sources, one distal and one proximal.
The next youngest sequence is a series of mafic lavas
(A2 ) that strike roughly SE and dip to the NE at approximately
30 . This sequence is made up of massive flows of andesite
composition exhibiting a wide variance in alteration from dark
green and chloritic, to light green, bleached and highly carbon-
itized. These flows have an aphanitic texture and amygdules are
sometimes found, particularly in the east part of the property
and in drill core. It is believed that there has been periods
of .quiescence in the volcanic activity since in many locations,
there are narrow discontinuous units of banded iron formation (E).
It is still unclear as to the exact origin of these sediments.
One of the possibilities is that these formations are chemical
precipitates; another is that they are clastic sediments. The
iron formation consists of alternating bands of fine grained,
gritty, sugary quartz, black magnetite-rich chert, dark grey
massive aphanitic chert and sometimes, bands of dull red jaspilite.
Almost all the iron formations in our map area contain sulphide mineralization and on the weathered surface are rusty brown. In
many of the outcrops, the iron formations are contorted, and
some are cut by secondary stringers of greyish white quartz. In
cases where the magnetite rich bands are present, the magnetic
survey clearly defines the presence of the iron formation.
Immediately following this period, or periods, of quiescence the first flows that passed over the iron formation
picked up xenoliths of the iron formation. Particulary well
preserved are xenoliths of the gritty white quartz. These fragments
- 6 -
range in size from V' to 2" and are angular. This unit (A2a) has
f* only been found in close proximity to iron formation or the mag
netic impression of iron formation.
The youngest extrusive of the map area is a pillowed
flow (A2p) which is seen overlying the massive flows in the western
portion of the property. In my mapping I was unable to confid
ently determine a direction of tops although it is generally
believed to be to the northeast in this region, {Carlson, H.D.
1964). This means that the rocks have not been overturned. The
pillows observed by the author were generally 2' to 3* long with
a 3:1 ratio of length to width. The composition of the pillowed
flow appeared very similar to that of the underlying massive flows.
South of the 0+00 BL near the Deloro-Shaw Township
boundary an intrusive of uncertain age occurs. It has been mapped
by the author as a gabbro (M,). It is medium to dark green in
colour and much coarser grained than the extrusive volcanics
of the map area. There are also small lath-like feldspars visible
in hand specimens.There are two diabase dykes in the map area, one is a
quartz diabase (O) of Matachewan age. The dyke trends NW. It
is strongly magnetic and medium to coarse grained. The other diabase
dyke is an olivene diabase(Q) of Keweenawan age. This dyke trends
ENE across the entire map area. The outcrop of olivene diabase
on line 32+00 E shows excellent spheroidal weathering.
On line 4+00 W we have an outcrop that does not appear
to coincide with the afore-mentioned sequence. The confusion may
be caused by the outcrops proximity to the junction of the N and
the NE trending faults.
STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
Faulting:
There are five faults which cross the map area. The
two oldest faults which cross the map area trend NE. These faults
are truncated by all the other faults particularly the series of
faults that trend NW similar to the Montreal River Fault. This
is well displayed on the l" to h mile Map 2222 entitled Night
- 7 -
Hawk Lake Area (Leahy, E.J. 1968).
The Montreal River Fault which crosses through the
centre of the Brown-McDade Option is older than the two N
trending faults. This is kn'own because an offset of the Montreal
River Fault by the N trending fault found in the eastern sect
ion of the property has been mapped near the Dome's gravel pit
(Pyke, D.R. 1973).
The two N trending faults are the youngest of the
three generations of faults found on the Shaw 12 and 1 3 Groups.
From the afore-mentioned offset of the Montreal River Fault and
assuming that the iron formation was continuous prior to fault
ing both faults show a dextral displacement. Using the magnetic
impression of the iron formation we see a dextral displacement
of approximately 250' along the N trending fault in the western
portion of the Brown-McDade Option.
Folding:
On the map of the Timmins Area (Pyke, D.R. 1973) a
questionable anticline is shown passing through the eastern portion
of the map area. From the joining of contacts in drill holes
(see map, back pocket) it appears there maybe some support for
this anticline. Unfortunately, structural measurements (i.e.
strikes and dips) failed to substantiate this conclusively.
CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS
The property is underlain by a layered volcanic sequence
of predominantly andesitic composition. These volcanics have
erratic lenses of banded iron formation located between the flows.
The entire property is in the north central portion of the Shaw
Dome with the units dipping shallowly to the north or northeast.
Given the status of the property and the nature of the
verry erratic gold values obtained, primarily in the banded iron
formation, further work does not appear warranted at this time.
November 17, 1981 J.E. Mountjoy
- 8 -
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Carlson, H.D. 1967, Geology of Ogden, Deloro and Shaw
Townships, District of Cochrane: Ontario Department
of Mines, Geological Branch, Open File Report No. 5012,
Preliminary Maps P.341 - P.343, Geology 1964 and 1965.
Leahy, E.J. 1971, Geology of the Night Hawk Lake Area,
District of Cochrane: Ontario Department of Mines
and Northern Affairs, Geological Report 96, Accomp
anying Map 2222 f Night Hawk Lake Area.
Northern Miner Press Limited, Canadian Mines Handbook
1947, pp 194.
Northern Miner Press Limited, Canadian Mines Handbook
1949, pp 44.
Pyke, D.R. 1974, Timmins Area, District of Cochrane and
Timiskaming: Ontario Div. Mines,'Preliminary Map
P.941, Geol. Series, l inch to l mile, Geology and
Compilation, 1973.
Pyke, D.R. 1975, On the Relationship of Gold Mineralization
and Ultramafic Volcanic Rocks in the Timmins Area;
Ontario Div. Mines, MP62, 23p.
Assessment Files - Resident Geologist's Office, Timmins.
SUPPLEMENTARY to SHAW No's 2 , 3 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT
Hollinger has drilled 2 holes on the Shaw #3 Group. Hole number one {SH 3-1-81) is located 125m north of the 0+00 BL on line 4E. This hole was drilled on a bearing of 250 at a dip of -450 for a distance of 727'. Hole number two {SH 3-2-81) is located 50m north of the 0+00 BL on XL 6E. This hole was drilled i of 528'.drilled on a bearing of 180O at a dip of -46 for a distance
Hollinger has also drilled seven holes on the Shaw #2 Group. Hole number one (SH 2-1-81) is located 150m south of the 0+00 BL on XL 6E. This hole was drilled on a bearing of 1800 at a dip of -45O for a distance of 643'. Hole number two {SH 2-2-81) is located 270m south of the 0+00 BL on XL 6E. This hole was drilled on a bearing of 180O at a dip of -45O for a distance of 131'. Hole number three {SH 2-3-81) is located 278m south of the 0+00 BL, 10.5m east of XL 6E. This hole was drilled on a bearing of 260 at a dip of -70O for a distance of 128'. Hole number four {SH2-4-81) is located 278m south of the 0+00 BL, 10.5m east of XL 6E . This hole was drilled vert ical for a distance of 100'. Hole number five {SH 2-5-81) is located approximately 270m south of the 0+00 BL, 4m east of XL 6E. This hole was drilled vertical for a distance of 35.5'. Hole number six (SH 2-6-81) is located approximately 244m south of the 0+00 BL, 4m east of XL 6E . This hole was drilled vertical for a distance of 35'. Hole number seven (SH 2-7-81) is located approximately 244m south of the 0+00 BL, 20m east of XL 6E. This hole was drilled on a bearing of 270O at a dip of -50O for a distance of 59.5'. Vertical projections of the afore-mentioned holes has been plotted on the map entitled "Shaw No*s 2, 3 Geology" at a scale of 1"^200'. Iron formations with low gold values were intersected as a result of the diamond drilling.
December 16, 1981 J.E. Mountjoy
Type ey.
ASSESSMENT WORK DETAILS
GEOLOGICAL
Township or Area.
Chief Line Cutter, or Contractor
A separate form is required for each type c 4 2Ae6NEe375 2.4376 SHAWSHAW TOWNSHIP
300
Name
Party Chief.Address
JOHN E. MOUNTJOYName
P.O.Box 320, Timmins, Ont. P4N 7E2Address
Consultant.Name
Address
Geological field mapping hv John E. Mountjoy_________Name
P.O. Box 320, Timmins, Ont.Address p4N 7 E2
COVERING DATES
Line Cutting —-.———-—.———————————^-——.———.———-—.
Field May 20 to October 30, 1981____________Instrument work, geological mapping, sampling etc.
Dffire October 31 to November 20, 1981________
INSTRUMENT DATA
Make, Model and Type.
Scale Constant or Sensitivity ——^—^——-—— Or provide copy of instrument data from Manufacturer's brochure.
Radiometric Background Count
Number of Stations Within Claim Group
Number of Readings Within Claim Group
Number of Miles of Line cut Within Claim Group Q 4 Q mi
Number of Samples Collected Within Claim Group(traversed)
CREDITS REQUESTED
Geological Survey
Geophysical Survey
Geochemical Survey
40UAYS^ per claim
D
nATF. Dec - 2' 1 98 *,r.NKn
20 DAYS per claim
S
D
D
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED _____List numerically—-—-
P.539611
P.539612
P. 539613
P.539614
P.539615
P.539616
.P..539617.,
P.539673 "J BP.539674
P.539675
P.539676
P.539677
TOTAL CLAIMS. 12
Send in Duplicate to:FRED W. MATTHEWS SUPERVISOR-PROJECTS SECTION DEPARTMENT Op'MINES Se NORTHERN AFFAIRS WHITNEY BLOCK QUEEN'S PARK TORONTO, ONTARIO
Performance and coverage credits do not apply to airborne gurveys
SUBMISSION OF GEOLOGICAL, GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL SURVEYS
AS ASSESSMENT WORK
In order to simplify the filing of geological, geochemical and ground geophysical surveys for assessment work, the Minister has approved the following procedure under Section 84 (8a) of the Ontario Mining Act. This special provision does not apply to airborne geophysical surveys.
If, in the opinion of the Minister, a ground geophysical survey meets the ; requirements prescribed for such a survey, including: V - '",
(a).,- substantial and systematic coverage of each claim ^ (b)/ line spacing not exceeding 400 foot intervals ,-y (c)' stations not exceeding 100 foot intervals or V' (d) the average number of readings per claim not less than 40 readingsr V *
it will •'qualify for a credit of 40 assessment work days for each claim so covered. It will f/ rtht beWiecessary for the applicant to furnish any data or breakdown concerning the
persons employed in the survey except for the names and addresses of those in charge of fX the various phases (linecutting contractor, etc.). It will be assumed that the required
number of man days were spent in producing the survey to qualify for the specifiedcredit.
Each additional ground geophysical survey using the same grid system and otherwise meeting these requirements will qualify for an assessment work credit of 20 days.
A geological survey using the same grid system, and meeting the requirements for submission of geological surveys for maximum credits will qualify for an assessment work credit of 20 days. If line cutting has not previously been reported with any other survey and is reported in conjunction with the geological survey a credit of 40 days per claim will be allowed for the survey.
Similarly, a geochemical survey using the same grid system with the average number of collected samples per claim being .not less than 40 samples, and meeting the requirements for the submission of geochemical surveys for maximum credits, will qualify for an assessment work credit of 20 days. If line cutting has not previously been reported with any other survey and is reported in conjunction with the geochemical survey a credit of 40 days per claim will be allowed for the survey.
Credits for partial coverage or for surveys not meeting requirements for full credit will be granted on a pro-rata basis.
If the credits are reduced for any reason, a fifteen day Notice of Intent will be issued. During this period, the applicant may apply to the Mining Commissioner for relief if his claims are jeopardized for lack of work or, if he wishes, may file with the Department, normal assessment work breakdowns listing the names of the employees and the dates of work. The survey would then be re-assessed to determine if higher credits may be allowed under the provisions of subsections 8 and 9 of section 84 of the Mining Act.
If new breakdowns are not submitted, the Performance and Coverage credits are confirmed to the Mining Recorder at the end of the fifteen days.
Ontario •k.Ministry ofNaturalResources
Notification of recording
of assessment work credits
Lands Administration Branch
Mining Lands Section
Ministry of Natural Resources
Room 1617. Whitney Block
Queen's Park, Toronto
M7A 1W3
RECEIVEDNUV - 3 WB1
MINING WN&S SICTION
Date of recording of work: October 29,1981________
Recorded holder:____Hoi linger Argus Limited
Address: ———~
Township or Area: ______Shaw Township
Box 320, Timmins, Ontario PAN 7E2
Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Mining claims
Geophysical
Magnetometer-
-days
P-539611 to 617 Incl. P-539673 to 677 Incl. P-546159
-days
-days
Induced polarization.
77 /9Section SB ( IS)
-days
Geological ̂ 20
jdays
-days
Geochemical .days
Man days
Special provision Q
Airborne O
Ground IXl
Notice to recorded holder:
S Survey reports and maps in duplicate be submitted to the Lands Administration Branch, Toronto with in 60 days from the date of recording of this work.
D Reports and maps are being forwarded to the Lands Administration Branch with this letter.
f ' -}. ( Mining recorder
c.c.Holl inger Argus Limited
792 (0/77) LA. 065
^Ontario
Ministry of Natural
sources
Technical Assessment Work Credits
File
2.4376
Recorded Holder
HOLLINGER ARGUS LIMITEDTownship or Area
Tnwnshin
Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Mining Claims AtsesMd
Geophysical
Electromagnetic ,
Magnetometer.
Radiometric
Induced polarization .
Section 86 (18)
Geological ^ - 20
Geochemical.
.days
.days
.days
.days
.days
.days
.days
P 539611 to 17 inclusiveP 539674 to 77 inclusiveP 451066 to 68 inclusive
Man days Q
Special provision D3
Airborne D
Ground 09
O Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
tpecial credits under section 86 (15a) for the following mining claims
10 Days P 539673
credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
IX) not sufficiently covered by the survey
P 546159
LJ Insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on ach claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 86(181-60:
Ministryof GeotechnicalNatural RonortResources "eP0'*
Ontario Approval
Mining Lands Comments
s ^SrtJ^lJLar.--.
To: Geophysics
Comments
I-"?:,k:;, i 1 :
IT"
LJ Approved f] With to see again with correctionsDate Signature
ro: Geology - Expenditures
Comments
lWith to sea again with corrections
To: Geochemistry
Comments
Q Approved Q] Wish to see again with correctionsDat* Signature
S:
D To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380) _
16*3 (81/10)
Ministry ofNaturalResources
1982 07 16
Your file:
Our file: 2 .4376
Hollinger Argus Limited P.O. Box 320 Timmins, Ontario P4N 7E2
Attn: Mr. J.E. Mountjoy
aaaamaIlk Ul. J 6
Dear Sir:
RE: Geological Survey submitted on Mining Claims ______P 539611 et al in the Township of Shawi- -. -
Enclosed are the plans (in duplicate) for the above- mentioned survey. In order to complete your submission we require the following on these maps:
a) both maps must be signed.
b) the outcrop must be designated by colour and by a le.tter corresponding to the rock type as listed in the legend.
For further information, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416-965-1380.
purs very truly,
"f F . Anderson Director Land Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380
A.' Barr/sc
Encls:
c.c. Mining Recorder Timmins.
RECEIVEDJUl 261982
MINING UNDS SCCTION
July 20, 1982.
Returned as requested.
John E. Mountjoy.
Ontario
Ministry ofNaturalResources
SEPT 38
Your file:
September 7, 1982
Mr. William L. GoodMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7
Dear Sir:
Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with state ments listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.
Yours very truly,
E.F. AndersonDirectorLands Administration Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM?A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316
/em
End.
cc: Hollinger Argus Limited Timmins, Ontario
cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining 4 Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario
845 (6/79)
Ministry ofNaturalResources
Notice of Intent
for Technical Reports 2.4376Ontario
September 7, 1982
An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.
If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.
If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.
If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed end a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.
846 (82fS l
(f'i\ i f e.
HOLLINGER ARGUS LIMITEDP.O. BOX 32OTIMMINS. ONTARIO P4N 7E2
TELEPHONE: (7O5) 294-1313
December 17, 1981
E.F. AndersonDirector, Lands Administration BranchMinistry of Natural ResourcesWhitney Block, Queen's ParkTORONTO, OntarioM7A 1X1
Dear Sir:Enclosed is a page to be added to
the Geological Report on the Shaw No's 2 and 3 Groups which was filed for assessment credits December 2 , 1 981. The page is a clarification of the diamond drilling done by Hollinger Argus Limited. The diamond drill holes were vertical ly projected and plotted on the map entitled "Geological Survey Shaw No's 2 and 3 Groups", but were not explained in the report.
Yours sincerely
RECEIVEDLand Management Brsnch CIRCULATE D COMMENTS mm [jBY
DEC 2 2 1981E, f. ANDERSON
j. R. MORTON
J. C. SMITH ^
W. GOOD
V. LEONARD
J, M . Sr^.tL
RCTURN TO R.6A50
J.E. Mountjoy Geologist
Enc. RECEIVEDDEC 2
MINING LANDS SECTION
December 18, 1981 2.4376
Office of the Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resource* 60 Wilson Avenue Timmlne, Ontario P4N 2S7
Dear Sin
Ve have received report* and naps for a Geological Survey submitted under Special Provision* (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims P.539611 et al, in the Township of Shaw.
Thi* material will be examined and aa*e**ed and a statement of assessment work credits will be issued.
Your* very truly,
B.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen** ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380
J. Skura/bk
c j Hollinger Argus Limited Timmins, Ontario Attention: John E. Mountjoy
1982 07 16 2.4376
Hollinger Argot Limited P.O. Box 320 Timmins, Ontario PAN 7E2
Attni Mr. J*E. Mountjoy
Dear Sir t
RE t Geological 8 H r ir ay submitted on Mining Claims _____P 539611 at al in the Town ah i p of Shaw- - .
Kncloaed are the plane (in duplicete) for the above- mentioned survey. In order to complete your submission we require the following on theae map*i
a) both mape must be eigned.
b) the outcrop must be designated by colour and by a letter corresponding to the rock type as listed in the legend.
For further information, please contact Mr. F.V. Matthews at 416-965-1380.
Tours very truly,
E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6450Quean's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1V3Phone: 416/965-1380
A/ Barr/se
Ends s
c.c. Mining Recorder Timmins.
1982 11 05 2.4376
Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resource*60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioPAN 2S7
Dear Sir:
RE: Geological Survey on Mining Claims P 539611 et al in the Township of Shaw.
The Geological Survey assessment work credits as listed with my Notice of Intent dated September 7, 1982 have been approved as of the above date.
Please inform the recorded holder of thase mining claims and so indicate on your records.
Tours very truly.
E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380
A. Barr:sc
cc: Hollinger Argus Limited Timmins, Ontario
cc: Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario
MAP SYM80LOGY
Aeriol Coblewoy
Boundary
l -itorrictionoi
Dutricl, Tamihip
Indian A*tin*
Approilmot*
Park Boundary
Bridge
Rio d, Ral (road
Building
Chimney
Cliff, Pit,Pile
Contours
l nt rrpol nled
Aporom ir01*
Control Points
H o r i lontol
Vertical
Culvert
Falls
Double l K l r iver
Fence, Hedge, __ ,^^^ Wall
Feotuie Outlineate ) ~ ~ ~~ ~
Flooded Land ftvvrij Or*w
LOCK ^-^^
Marsh or Swamp -* -^
Mast j,1:.
Mine Head Frame a
Outcrop -.'..-"-V..
H OI774051
O 300 02
T
JT-Faltt
Pipeline(obcwi ground)
Roi l road
Sing)* T rack
Oaubl* Track
Abandon l d
'uriloblt
Road
, County
To
Act* M (toad of daughlful
main l* none* or
lignificanl driveway)
*f l
Rapids
Doubl* line river with mulfipie rap'dt
D-,uklr hat n*rr itN Multlpl* ropid*
^ .Reservoir
River, Stream, Gonal
-Itiction o( f l-o w ^^__-. ̂.
hockli jnif icont -f
: hoal . ':^y
Spot Elevation(lak* .| e yotion*( '300-0
lower a
Transmission Line
Tunnel ^^)————w
Utility Poles
Wharf .Dock, Pier
Wooded Area
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION
S.R. - SURFACE RIGHTS M.R. -MINING RIGHTS
Description Onfer No. DIM Deposition Fit*
J) Rtc Pjrp. SfC.3 PLA. 189543
fit) W. 97/77 15/12/77 S.R.O. 66555
SAND AND GRAVEL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
53 666
68760
KEY PLAN
For O.B *M. Map
20174*
20174*
0053600
SS3:5:-S:
XvXvXv-
OOS35M
201749005360G
2017490053500
ale
WHITNEY TWP
490000mE
Q.^H
O flCoUJo
536 00 00 mN
47886 \47867
p l P
584113 ,.,,\ 584114
47884 p
584116
528853 528858
478 6Bp
- 5 8 4 M 2
529944 l 47885
p584116
H.R. H.R.I040\ "018 \ 2 8450
-^-:.-:-/ 500909 528855 ' 528\ 860
5 39677 l 539
CL 175 1931262894 A
H.R. P
1044
P \H.R 16333 \ 981
50Q9II jbc, 3 009115WITHDRAWN . FROM STAKING
P.P.
P 15320 \ 4P 26693 \ P26694i
89 l 540188
,uk H n ^V n' D.S. 2 l 238
1532213441 P 19159
H.R, P H.R.985 l 986 '
R 22584 l P 22585 l R 26784
37209030, l/ P ^ . - ^. _ ̂ - -L. -^
: 35490 ; 35489591343
533875 J 59386*
591348 l 591347 | 5913465 4 0/21 l l
6/34655 |63^653
OS. M
R I703)T
FARM ,^ LO
5546^28 l 'i 5 4 631\ J
6155 77 ' 615'5 73 6IDI6S7 554635 l 554 S36
— ~ ~ —\— -^ (~^
390^6 / p- ^^^I 6!005Z i 610O54
6ISV328 i 610051 6I004B j y ! 6097-16 6IOC47 ' 6 15;580
U f
— — — -- — L . 609744 , \
618582 ,/ 6)5571
695518057 4am
S96499/ 6I586\I J 6 I9&Q2 615606 \ l 6 15805V.
E.O. 371
!300 /P 13814o, ___uy X
"^"" l s~ ~ X ~~ 615859 61 5807 lv DamS615860 i S 6 l \5 8 63
613827 l 6I51B34 \ ' 615843 s. SI5B44x - r, \
S 6 15808 l l 6 l 6003
^615842 l 611584^8 S6I5852 l 6 168^5 615809 615802
-l _ _ _ _ -t- _ _ -
615796 l SI 578613813 6 1,5816
J ? 9-i--.
615850 l 6158^761*648 6 1 58375^99/99^4 l 5 49997
p.^ ?93
\ ' xE99?3S l 399X996-f 9 3
615839 ' , 615848 59734,2 397339
Q.
^I-
Z < Soc< o
536 00 00 m N
ELDORADO TWP.
LEGEND
HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No
OTHER R OADS
TRAILS
SURVEYED LINES:
TOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES, ETC.
LOTS, MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS, ETC
UNSURVEYEO LINES
LOT LINES
PARCEL BOUNDARY
MINING CLAIMS ETC
RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY
UTILITY LINES
NON PERENNIAL STREAM
FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS
SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN
RESERVATIONS
ORIGINAL SHORELINE
MARSH OR MUSKEG
MINES
TRAVERSE MONUMENT
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
TYPE OF DOCUMENT SYMBOL
PATENT. SURFACE 8t M INING RIGHTS ................... 0
.SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY........................
, MINING RIGHTS ONLY ....,...,...........^... O
LEASE, SURFACE 8* MINING RIGHTS...,-. ....... .. H
" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY.......................... H
" , MINING RIGHTS ONLY.............. ............ B
LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ..........^...-...........,.. T
ORDER-IN-COUNCIL .....'...,............................. OC
RESERVATION ...,^,.....,,,.,,.....................^.^
CANCELLED ._,.........,...,,.........,,^......,.,
SAND St G RAVEL ..,....,........,.............^.......,..
NOTE: MINING RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATENTED PRIOR TO MAY 6.
1913, VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC
LANDS ACT, R SO 1970. CHAP 38O, SEC. 63, SUBSEC 1.
500Metres
10 D lhalns -. - r. n ~ i
1000 ' Metres
10 20 30 40 SO 60 70
500 D 1000 2000 3000 4000
Chalnt
5000 -^ Feel
SCALE 1 :20 000
DATE OF ISSUE
AUG.-:*
TOWNSHIP
SHAWM.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
TIMMINSMINING DIVISION
PORCUPINELAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION
COCHRANE
MinistryofNatural Management
Branch
Ontario
Dal t 1981Numb*i
G-399942A06NE3375 2,4376 SHAW 200
J
DE
LO
RO
T
WR
SH
AW
T
WR
WHITNEY TWP
SHAW TWR
546
Az cc,py
675
l O l 8
HOLLINGER ARGUS LTD
SHAW Ntfs. 2,3
GEOLOGY
Shaw Twp. Ont
SCALE * 1=2400
or
l inch to 200 feet
DRAWN BY . W, B. Caughell