3
Erratum Geometrically Exact, Intrinsic Theory for Dynamics of Curved and Twisted Anisotropic Beams Dewey H. Hodges Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332 [AIAA J., 41(6), pp. 11311137, (2003)] DOI: 10.2514/1.40556 I N [1] a set of governing equations was derived for the geometrically exact dynamics of an initially curved and twisted anisotropic beam. A fully intrinsic formulation is devoid of displacement and rotation variables, making them especially attractive because of the absence of singularities, innite-degree nonlinearities, and other undesirable baggage associated with nite rotation variables. Though not applicable to all problems involving beam analysis, they were applied in fully intrinsic form to the aeroelasticity of HALE aircraft in the computer code NATASHA (Nonlinear Aeroelastic Trim and Stability Analysis of HALE Aircraft) [2,3]. The purpose of this Erratum is to correct an unintended impression that may be rightfully inferred from [1]: that, by virtue of the absence of certain references, the notion of writing fully intrinsic governing equations for the dynamics of beams originated with the author. It did not. In fact, the notion of fully intrinsic governing equations for beams goes back nearly three decades before the publication of [1]. The oldest formulation of this type known to the author is that of Hegemier and Nair [4], cited in [5] but not in [1]; the failure of this author to cite the work was inexcusable, because this work was most certainly known to him at the time. Hegemier and Nair present a complete set of fully intrinsic equations for the dynamics of transversely isotropic beams undergoing extension, bending, and torsion. This type of formulation is characterized by partial differential equations of motion and kinematical equations, with unknowns including stress resultants, generalized strains (i.e., 1-D extension, torsion, and bending measures), and generalized velocities (i.e., 1-D velocity and angular velocity measures). Although no solutions are presented, the authors do discuss application of their formulation. In doing so, they introduce orientation angles, which may be needed for some problems; although displacement variables are not introduced, they too may be needed for some problems. The paper does not mention the possibility of using the equations in fully intrinsic form to solve problems. The main distinction of this type of formulation on which this Erratum is focused is the partial differential kinematical equations that are devoid of displacement or orientation measures. They may also be thought of as spacetime compatibility equations, such as Eqs. (13) and (16) of [1] and Eqs. (63) and (64) of [4]. One of the applications mentioned in [4] is the mechanics of cables. It is interesting that this type of formulation also shows up in the more recent literature on mechanics of cables (see, for example, [614]). None of these works were cited in [1]. Another published application of a fully intrinsic formulation is found in the robotics literature [15]. The following conclusions are offered: First, the author has been unable to nd any papers pertinent to this discussion that are older than [4]. Second, the author has been unable to nd a citation to [4] in the more recent literature [615]. Third, [1] appears to be unique in offering a geometrically exact, fully intrinsic, dynamic formulation including shear deformation. Finally, of all the works cited herein, only [1] explicitly suggests the use of the fully intrinsic equations for a dynamic formulation without their being augmented with at least some form of angular displacement parameters such as orientation angles. It should be noted, however, that a fully intrinsic formulation has been used for static equilibrium behavior of statically determinate beams (see, for example, [16]). Acknowledgment The author appreciates the kind assistance of Noel Perkins of the University of Michigan in identifying many of the key references of this Erratum. References [1] Hodges, D. H., Geometrically Exact, Intrinsic Theory for Dynamics of Curved and Twisted Anisotropic Beams,AIAA Journal, Vol. 41, No. 6, June 2003, pp. 11311137. doi:10.2514/2.2054 [2] Patil, M. J., and Hodges, D. H., Flight Dynamics of Highly Flexible Flying Wings,Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 43, No. 6, 2006, pp. 17901799. doi:10.2514/1.17640 [3] Chang, C.-S., Hodges, D. H., and Patil, M. J., Flight Dynamics of Highly Flexible Aircraft,Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 45, No. 2, Mar.Apr. 2008, pp. 538545. doi:10.2514/1.30890 [4] Hegemier, G. A., and Nair, S., A Nonlinear Dynamical Theory for Heterogeneous, Anisotropic, Elastic Rods,AIAA Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, Jan. 1977, pp. 815. doi:10.2514/3.7296 [5] Hodges, D. H., Nonlinear Composite Beam Theory, AIAA, Reston, VA, 2006. [6] Ablow, C. M., and Schechter, S., Numerical Simulation of Undersea Cable Dynamics,Ocean Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 6, 1983, pp. 443457. doi:10.1016/0029-8018(83)90046-X [7] Papazoglou, V. J., Mavrakos, S. A., and Triantafyllou, M. S., Non- Linear Cable Response and Model Testing in Water,Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 140, No. 1, 1990, pp. 103115. doi:10.1016/0022-460X(90)90909-J Received 23 August 2008; accepted for publication 4 September 2008. Copyright © 2009 by Dewey H. Hodges. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code 0001-1452/09 $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC. Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; [email protected]. Fellow AIAA. AIAA JOURNAL Vol. 47, No. 5, May 2009 1308 Downloaded by QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLLEGE on July 15, 2014 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.40556

Geometrically Exact, Intrinsic Theory for Dynamics of Curved and Twisted Anisotropic Beams

  • Upload
    dewey-h

  • View
    238

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Geometrically Exact, Intrinsic Theory for Dynamics of Curved and Twisted Anisotropic Beams

Erratum

Geometrically Exact, Intrinsic Theory for Dynamicsof Curved and Twisted Anisotropic Beams

Dewey H. Hodges∗

Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332

[AIAA J., 41(6), pp. 1131–1137, (2003)]

DOI: 10.2514/1.40556

I N [1] a set of governing equations was derived for thegeometrically exact dynamics of an initially curved and twisted

anisotropic beam. A fully intrinsic formulation is devoid ofdisplacement and rotation variables, making them especiallyattractive because of the absence of singularities, infinite-degreenonlinearities, and other undesirable baggage associated with finiterotation variables. Though not applicable to all problems involvingbeam analysis, they were applied in fully intrinsic form to theaeroelasticity of HALE aircraft in the computer code NATASHA(Nonlinear Aeroelastic Trim and Stability Analysis of HALEAircraft) [2,3]. The purpose of this Erratum is to correct anunintended impression that may be rightfully inferred from [1]: that,by virtue of the absence of certain references, the notion of writingfully intrinsic governing equations for the dynamics of beamsoriginated with the author. It did not.

In fact, the notion of fully intrinsic governing equations for beamsgoes back nearly three decades before the publication of [1]. Theoldest formulation of this type known to the author is that ofHegemier and Nair [4], cited in [5] but not in [1]; the failure of thisauthor to cite the work was inexcusable, because this work was mostcertainly known to him at the time. Hegemier and Nair present acomplete set of fully intrinsic equations for the dynamics oftransversely isotropic beams undergoing extension, bending, andtorsion. This type of formulation is characterized by partialdifferential equations of motion and kinematical equations, withunknowns including stress resultants, generalized strains (i.e., 1-Dextension, torsion, and bending measures), and generalizedvelocities (i.e., 1-D velocity and angular velocity measures).Although no solutions are presented, the authors do discussapplication of their formulation. In doing so, they introduceorientation angles, which may be needed for some problems;although displacement variables are not introduced, they too may beneeded for some problems. The paper does not mention thepossibility of using the equations in fully intrinsic form to solveproblems.

The main distinction of this type of formulation on which thisErratum is focused is the partial differential kinematical equationsthat are devoid of displacement or orientation measures. They mayalso be thought of as space–time compatibility equations, such asEqs. (13) and (16) of [1] and Eqs. (63) and (64) of [4].

One of the applications mentioned in [4] is the mechanics ofcables. It is interesting that this type of formulation also shows up inthe more recent literature on mechanics of cables (see, for example,[6–14]). None of these works were cited in [1]. Another publishedapplication of a fully intrinsic formulation is found in the roboticsliterature [15].

The following conclusions are offered: First, the author has beenunable to find any papers pertinent to this discussion that are olderthan [4]. Second, the author has been unable to find a citation to [4] inthe more recent literature [6–15]. Third, [1] appears to be unique inoffering a geometrically exact, fully intrinsic, dynamic formulationincluding shear deformation. Finally, of all the works cited herein,only [1] explicitly suggests the use of the fully intrinsic equations fora dynamic formulation without their being augmented with at leastsome form of angular displacement parameters such as orientationangles. It should be noted, however, that a fully intrinsic formulationhas been used for static equilibrium behavior of staticallydeterminate beams (see, for example, [16]).

Acknowledgment

The author appreciates the kind assistance of Noel Perkins of theUniversity of Michigan in identifying many of the key references ofthis Erratum.

References

[1] Hodges, D. H., “Geometrically Exact, Intrinsic Theory for Dynamics ofCurved and Twisted Anisotropic Beams,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 41,No. 6, June 2003, pp. 1131–1137.doi:10.2514/2.2054

[2] Patil, M. J., and Hodges, D. H., “Flight Dynamics of Highly FlexibleFlying Wings,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 43, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1790–1799.doi:10.2514/1.17640

[3] Chang, C.-S., Hodges, D. H., and Patil, M. J., “Flight Dynamics ofHighly Flexible Aircraft,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 45, No. 2, Mar.–Apr. 2008, pp. 538–545.doi:10.2514/1.30890

[4] Hegemier, G. A., and Nair, S., “A Nonlinear Dynamical Theory forHeterogeneous, Anisotropic, Elastic Rods,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 15,No. 1, Jan. 1977, pp. 8–15.doi:10.2514/3.7296

[5] Hodges, D. H., Nonlinear Composite Beam Theory, AIAA, Reston,VA, 2006.

[6] Ablow, C. M., and Schechter, S., “Numerical Simulation of UnderseaCable Dynamics,” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 6, 1983, pp. 443–457.doi:10.1016/0029-8018(83)90046-X

[7] Papazoglou, V. J., Mavrakos, S. A., and Triantafyllou, M. S., “Non-Linear Cable Response andModel Testing inWater,” Journal of Soundand Vibration, Vol. 140, No. 1, 1990, pp. 103–115.doi:10.1016/0022-460X(90)90909-J

Received 23 August 2008; accepted for publication 4 September 2008.Copyright © 2009 byDeweyH. Hodges. Published by the American Instituteof Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this papermay be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the$10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 RosewoodDrive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code 0001-1452/09 $10.00 incorrespondence with the CCC.

∗Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering; [email protected] AIAA.

AIAA JOURNALVol. 47, No. 5, May 2009

1308

Dow

nloa

ded

by Q

UE

EN

MA

RY

& W

EST

FIE

LD

CO

LL

EG

E o

n Ju

ly 1

5, 2

014

| http

://ar

c.ai

aa.o

rg |

DO

I: 1

0.25

14/1

.405

56

Page 2: Geometrically Exact, Intrinsic Theory for Dynamics of Curved and Twisted Anisotropic Beams

[8] Burgess, J. J., “Equations of Motion of a Submerged Cable withBending Stiffness,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conferenceon Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, American Society ofMechanical Engineers, New York, 1992, pp. 283–289.

[9] Triantafyllou, M. S., and Howell, C. T., “Non-Linear UnstableResponse of Hanging Chains,” Journal of Sound and Vibration,Vol. 162, No. 2, 1993, pp. 263–280.doi:10.1006/jsvi.1993.1118

[10] Triantafyllou, M. S., and Howell, C. T., “Dynamic Response of CablesUnder Negative Tension: An Ill-Posed Problem,” Journal of Sound andVibration, Vol. 173, No. 4, 1994, pp. 433–447.doi:10.1006/jsvi.1994.1239

[11] Tjavaras, A. A., Zhu, Q., Liu, Y., Triantafyllou, M. S., and Yue, D. K.P., “The Mechanics of Highly Extensible Cables,” Journal of Sound

and Vibration, Vol. 213, No. 4, 1998, pp. 709–737.doi:10.1006/jsvi.1998.1526

[12] Gatti-Bono, C., and Perkins, N. C., “Physical andNumericalModellingof the Dynamic Behavior of a Fly Line,” Journal of Sound and

Vibration, Vol. 255, No. 3, 2002, pp. 555–577.doi:10.1006/jsvi.2001.4180

[13] Goyal, S., Perkins, N., and Lee, C., “Nonlinear Dynamics and Loopformation In Kirchhoff Rods with Implications to the Mechanics ofDNA and Cables,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 209, No. 1,2005, pp. 371–389.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2005.03.027

[14] Gobat, J. I., and Grosenbaugh, M. A., “Time-Domain NumericalSimulation of Ocean Cable Structures,” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 33,No. 10, 2006, pp. 1373–1400.doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.07.012

[15] Davis, J. H., andHirschorn, R.M., “AModel for the Embedded TendonControl of a Slender Three-Dimensional Flexible Robot Link,”Dynamics and Control, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1994, pp. 185–208.doi:10.1007/BF01985941

[16] Lu, C.-L., and Perkins, N., “Nonlinear Spatial Equilibria and Stabilityof Cables Under Uni-Axial Torque and Thrust,” Journal of Applied

Mechanics, Vol. 61, No. 4, 1994, pp. 879–886.doi:10.1115/1.2901571

E. OranAssociate Editor

HODGES 1309

Dow

nloa

ded

by Q

UE

EN

MA

RY

& W

EST

FIE

LD

CO

LL

EG

E o

n Ju

ly 1

5, 2

014

| http

://ar

c.ai

aa.o

rg |

DO

I: 1

0.25

14/1

.405

56

Page 3: Geometrically Exact, Intrinsic Theory for Dynamics of Curved and Twisted Anisotropic Beams

This article has been cited by:

1. Jinwu Xiang, Yongju Yan, Daochun Li. 2014. Recent advance in nonlinear aeroelastic analysis and control of the aircraft.Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 27:1, 12-22. [CrossRef]

2. Phillip W. Richards, Pezhman Mardanpour, Robert Herd, Dewey H. HodgesThe Effect of Inertial and ConstitutiveProperties on Body-Freedom Flutter of a Flying Wing . [Citation] [PDF] [PDF Plus]

3. Olivier A. Bauchau, Hao Xin, Shiyu Dong, Zhiheng Li, Shilei Han. 2013. Intrinsic Time Integration Procedures for RigidBody Dynamics. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics 8:1, 011006. [CrossRef]

4. Zahra Sotoudeh, Dewey HodgesStability Analysis of Columns with Imperfection . [Citation] [PDF] [PDF Plus]5. Zahra Sotoudeh, Dewey H. Hodges. 2011. Incremental Method for Structural Analysis of Joined-Wing Aircraft. Journal

of Aircraft 48:5, 1588-1601. [Citation] [PDF] [PDF Plus]6. Zahra Sotoudeh, Dewey H. Hodges. 2011. Modeling Beams With Various Boundary Conditions Using Fully Intrinsic

Equations. Journal of Applied Mechanics 78:3, 031010. [CrossRef]7. Ajeet Kumar, Subrata Mukherjee. 2011. A Geometrically Exact Rod Model Including In-Plane Cross-Sectional

Deformation. Journal of Applied Mechanics 78:1, 011010. [CrossRef]8. Mayuresh J. Patil, Dewey H. Hodges. 2011. Variable-order finite elements for nonlinear, fully intrinsic beam equations.

Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures 6:1-4, 479-493. [CrossRef]9. Zahra Sotoudeh, Dewey HodgesModeling Beams with Various Boundary Conditions Using Fully Intrinsic Equations .

[Citation] [PDF] [PDF Plus]

Dow

nloa

ded

by Q

UE

EN

MA

RY

& W

EST

FIE

LD

CO

LL

EG

E o

n Ju

ly 1

5, 2

014

| http

://ar

c.ai

aa.o

rg |

DO

I: 1

0.25

14/1

.405

56