20
Georgianization

Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Georgianization

Page 2: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Structural oppositions in Deetz

Medieval Culture

• Asymmetrical• Corporate• Labor of self • Traditional• Local• Organic

Georgian culture

• Balanced• Individualized• Labor of others• Popular/Modern• Global• Ordered

Page 3: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Individualism

ONE POT + ONE PLACE = ONE PERSON

Page 4: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Death’s Head“Here lies buried”

Cherub“Here lies the body of”

Urn and willow“In Memory of”

Typical epitaphs

Increasing abstraction: Common fate of death was re-symbolized first in a more pleasant afterlife and then in

the recognition of the life lived

Page 5: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Order, Segregation, Secularism

Individualism Freedom

freedom from traditional social relations

Page 6: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Beyond the people without history

• Moral mission: – to help the poor, powerless, and

inarticulate

• Social Action: – Africans and African Americans as key

players in the “formation and transformation of the black Atlantic world”

Page 7: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Ethnicity: self-conscious identity

• African– West African/Central African– Fon, Igbo, Kongo, Yoruba, etc.

• African American/Black• “Oppressed ethnicity”• Race and Racism

Page 8: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Class

• White over black– During and after slavery

• Internal class dynamics within African and African American communities– African elites and bourgeoisie– African American middle class

Page 9: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Gender?

• Very few studies of gender in African Diaspora archaeology

• Reflects persistence of moral mission

Page 10: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Interaction• Acculturation

– Simple replacement of African-derived items and practices with European/Euroamerican

– Simplistic one-way reading of meaning

• Creolization– Interaction and exchange/agency in social and

cultural form– Multidimensional and creative: “new” cultures– Segregated approach

• Power relations– Domination and resistance/agency in political

form– Integrated approach

Page 11: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Material Culture

• How do objects produce history?• Recursive:

– objects act on makers and users

• Emblematic expressions of identity

Page 12: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Africa in America

• Most agree that “African Americans form a culturally distinct community with its own heritage” (Singleton p.8)

• At least in part a result of its African background

• How was this cultural identity constructed; – What were the sources? What were the

contexts? What were the intentions?• How do we answer these questions?

Page 13: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Atlantic African Slave

Trade

Trans-Atlantic exports by region1650-1900

Region

Number of slavesaccounted for

%

Senegambia 479,900 4.7

Upper Guinea 411,200 4.0

Windward Coast 183,200 1.8

Gold Coast 1,035,600 10.1

Blight of Benin 2,016,200 19.7

Blight of Biafra 1,463,700 14.3

West Central 4,179,500 40.8

South East 470,900 4.6

Total 10,240,200 100.0

Page 14: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Trans-Atlantic imports by region1450-1900

Region

Number of slaves

accounted for %

Brazil 4,000,000 35.4

Spanish Empire 2,500,000 22.1

British West Indies 2,000,000 17.7

French West Indies 1,600,000 14.1

British North America and United States 500,000 4.4

Dutch West Indies 500,000 4.4

Danish West Indies 28,000 0.2

Europe (and Islands) 200,000 1.8

Total 11,328,000 100.0

Page 15: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Revisionist School• Placing Africans and their descendent at

the center of their own histories• Breaking with world systems/dependency

theory which saw– Africa as passive agent in Euro-African

interactions– Africans and Americans at a lower stage of

development– saw the slave as powerless and established

slavery as the principle source of explanation• reduced the African identity of the slave• Flattened African American identity to that of the

slave

Page 16: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Thornton: Revisit Sources• Atlantic trade was not essential to African

well-being and development• African economy was productive, diverse, and

well-integrated• Africans largely controlled the nature of their

interactions with Europeans• African trade, including the slave trade, was

voluntary– Slavery was part of African societies and the

Atlantic slave trade articulated with established practices

Page 17: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

Early sites of Atlantic raid and trade

Azores

Madeira

Cape Verde Islands

Page 18: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced
Page 20: Georgianization. Structural oppositions in Deetz Medieval Culture Asymmetrical Corporate Labor of self Traditional Local Organic Georgian culture Balanced

PrestigeDepiction of the meeting between the

Portuguese expedition and the Kongolese Royal Family