23
GeoSyntec GeoSyntec Future Directions Future Directions for Assessing Vapor for Assessing Vapor Intrusion Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

Future DirectionsFuture Directionsfor Assessing Vapor Intrusionfor Assessing Vapor Intrusion

byTodd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc.

AEHS VI WorkshopOctober 19, 2004

Page 2: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

OutlineOutline

Improved Protocols – What’s ComingImproved Protocols – What’s Coming QsoilQsoil

Perimeter crack model vs 0.05>QPerimeter crack model vs 0.05>Qsoilsoil/Q/Qbldgbldg>0.0001>0.0001 Barometric PumpingBarometric Pumping Implications for Data VariabilityImplications for Data Variability

Alternative Sampling OptionsAlternative Sampling Options More discrete in time and spaceMore discrete in time and space More integratedMore integrated

Page 3: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

APIAPI - - Collecting and Interpreting Soil Gas Samples from the Vadose Zone: A Practical Strategy for Assessing the Subsurface Vapor-to-Indoor-Air Migration Pathway at Petroleum Hydrocarbon Sites – Final Draft, July 2004

Health Canada – Soil Vapour Intrusion Guidance for Health Canada Screening Level Risk Assessment (SLRA) – Final Draft, October 2004

EPRI - Best Practices Manual For Evaluating Subsurface Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air – Preliminary Draft, Sept 2004

ITRC – Workshop next week to develop an outline Others?

Improved ProtocolsImproved Protocols

Page 4: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

Conceptual ModelsConceptual Models More tools in the toolboxMore tools in the toolbox StandardizationStandardization QA/QC checksQA/QC checks Interpretive ToolsInterpretive Tools

Areas for AdvancementAreas for Advancement

Page 5: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

QQsoilsoil: Perimeter Crack Model: Perimeter Crack Model

)/2ln(

2Qsoil

crackcrack

crack

RZ

Pxk

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

C CL L LS S SC SCL SI SIC SICL SIL SL

SCS Soil Type

Qso

il (

L/m

in)

0.8 L/min > Qsoil > 0.05 L/min0.8 L/min > Qsoil > 0.05 L/min

Page 6: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

QQsoilsoil: Current Recommendation: Current Recommendation

0.05 > Qsoil/Qbuilding > 0.0001 (Johnson, 2002)0.05 > Qsoil/Qbuilding > 0.0001 (Johnson, 2002)

(perhaps 0.01 to 0.0001 is more common)(perhaps 0.01 to 0.0001 is more common)

For a typical residence: V ~ 600m3, AER ~0.5 hr-1For a typical residence: V ~ 600m3, AER ~0.5 hr-1

Qbuilding ~ 300 m3/hr or 5,000 L/minQbuilding ~ 300 m3/hr or 5,000 L/min

250 L/min > Qsoil > 0.5 L/min 250 L/min > Qsoil > 0.5 L/min (perhaps 50 to 0.5)(perhaps 50 to 0.5)

Generally higher than perimeter crack modelGenerally higher than perimeter crack model

OSWER Guidance uses 5 L/min, strictly empiricalOSWER Guidance uses 5 L/min, strictly empirical

Page 7: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

Barometric PumpingBarometric Pumping

Increasing B.P.Increasing B.P. Decreasing B.P.Decreasing B.P.

Gas is compressible, so changes in B.P. either compress soil gas or allow it to expand. No net flow in the long-term, but short term...

Ideal Gas Law: P1V1 = P2V2

Ground Surface

Page 8: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004
Page 9: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

Transient Effect of Barometric PumpingTransient Effect of Barometric Pumping

bpo

a

tP

PA

bpbpsoil

xQ

QQsoil-BPsoil-BP = transient soil gas flow rate induced by B.P. change = transient soil gas flow rate induced by B.P. change A = area of the footprint of the buildingA = area of the footprint of the building aa = air-filled porosity = air-filled porosity

xxbpbp = depth of barometric pressure propagation = depth of barometric pressure propagation

ΔΔP = barometric pressure change over time period “tP = barometric pressure change over time period “tbpbp””

PPoo = mean air pressure = mean air pressure

0.02 > 0.02 > ΔΔP/PP/Poottbpbp > 0.002 (Parker, 2002) > 0.002 (Parker, 2002)

Page 10: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

QQsoilsoil: Perimeter Crack Model vs Delta BP: Perimeter Crack Model vs Delta BP

Maximum Qsoil from Barometric Pumping

-5-4-3-2-1012345

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Vadose Zone Thickness (m)

Qs

oil

(L/m

in)

Magnitude agrees well with empirical estimate of 5 L/minMagnitude agrees well with empirical estimate of 5 L/min

But in the short-term, Qsoil can be -5 to 5 L/min!But in the short-term, Qsoil can be -5 to 5 L/min!

Page 11: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

Barometric Pressure ChangesBarometric Pressure Changes

Arrows represent approximately 24 hours,

during which BP may change a lot (>200Pa in this example) , or hardly at all

Compare this to 4Pa stack effect!

(dP can be up to 5,000 Pa)

Page 12: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

Temporal VariabilityTemporal Variability

Page 13: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

Implications for Data VariabilityImplications for Data Variability

How much of this is due to short-term barometric pressure fluctuations?How much of this is due to short-term barometric pressure fluctuations?

Robert Ettinger
Do you think barometric pressure fluctuations are a more significant factor in the data variability than other sources (background, sampling variability, ventilation variability, analytical variability). May need to discuss these other components as well.
Page 14: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

Alternative Sampling OptionsAlternative Sampling Options

Option 1: More Integrated Data Time-Integrated: sample over several barometric

cycles (e.g. 7 days) to smooth temporal variability Volume-Integrated: to smooth spatial variability

Option 2:More Discrete Data over time Real-time monitoring Vertical Profiling Monitor BP and delta P to establish correlation

Robert Ettinger
Before discussing consequences, need to decide when it is an important factor. If you need to evaluate barometric influences, then consider refined assessment.
Page 15: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

Time-Integrated SamplesTime-Integrated Samples

Summa CanistersSumma Canisters Smaller critical orificeSmaller critical orifice Solenoid valve “timer”Solenoid valve “timer”

ATD TubesATD Tubes Lower Flow Rate over Longer TimeLower Flow Rate over Longer Time

VOST Samplers – borrow stack testing tools?VOST Samplers – borrow stack testing tools? PUF: TO-13 designed for 300mPUF: TO-13 designed for 300m33 samples samples

10m by 10m house, 10 m vadose zone, 30% air-porosity…10m by 10m house, 10 m vadose zone, 30% air-porosity… Or Qsoil for 24 hours…Or Qsoil for 24 hours…

Radon analogy: passive electret samplersRadon analogy: passive electret samplers

Page 16: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

Volume Integrated SamplesVolume Integrated Samples

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0 1 2 3 4 5 6Sampled Volume (L)

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n (

pp

bv

)

1,1,1-TCATCE1,1-DCEc-1,2-DCE

(DiGiulio, 2004)

Representative Purge VolumeRepresentative Purge Volume

Page 17: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

High Purge Volume SamplingHigh Purge Volume Sampling

Page 18: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

High Purge Volume SamplingHigh Purge Volume Sampling

PID readings ~ 1,000 ppmv over 1,700,000 L (3 days)indicates concentrations are spatially uniform

Total mass removed ~ 10 kg (10-6 risk needs only 0.001 kg!)Combine with pneumatic testing, assess gas K

Q = 15 scfm

Page 19: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

Is Bigger Always Better?Is Bigger Always Better?

Page 20: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

Huntington Beach Soil GasHUNTINGTON BEACH SITE - SOIL GAS

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Time

Va

lue

(%

)

CH4

CO2

O2

Page 21: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004
Page 22: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004
Page 23: GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004

GeoSyntecGeoSyntec

Summary & ConclusionsSummary & Conclusions

New and Improved Protocols are coming – data qualityNew and Improved Protocols are coming – data quality

Qsoil from BP changes is probably not negligibleQsoil from BP changes is probably not negligible

What is the contribution to data variability? What is the contribution to data variability?

$$ to find out?$$ to find out?

Risk assessment requires long-term average exposuresRisk assessment requires long-term average exposures

Time- or volume-integrated samples may helpTime- or volume-integrated samples may help

Vertical profiling needed for assessing biodegradationVertical profiling needed for assessing biodegradation

Robert Ettinger
Can we make a comment on when barometric pressure influences may be significant. For many scenarios, this does not need to be considered, but for low porosity and high depth, barometric pressure fluctuations may result in XX% increase in attenuation factor.