Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
0
GEOTECHNICAL AND SALINITY INVESTIGATION REPORT
ADDRESS: 137 South Street, Marsden Park NSW
2765
CLIENT: The Bathla Group
DATE: 27 August 2019
REPORT NO: NE540
GEOTESTA PTY LTD | ABN 91851620815 | Unit 20 / 1 Talavera Road Macquarie Park NSW 2113
Phone: 1300 852216 |email: [email protected]
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
1
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 2
2. FIELD INVESTIGATION .................................................................................................. 3
3. FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................... 4
3.1 Site Details, Location and Topography ............................................................................4
3.2 Geology ...........................................................................................................................4
3.3 Soil/Rock Profile ..............................................................................................................5
3.4 Site Classification .............................................................................................................6
3.5 Groundwater ...................................................................................................................6
3.6 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing .....................................................................................6
3.7 Laboratory Testing and Analysis–Salinity and Aggressivity ............................................7
3.8 Salinity Assessment .........................................................................................................7
3.9 Aggressivity Aassessment ...............................................................................................8
3.10 Exposure Classifications for concrete in Saline and sulfate soils ..................................9
4. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATION ......................................................................... 9
4.1 Geotechnical Design Parameters ......................................................................................9
4.2 Strip/Pad Footing System............................................................................................... 10
4.3 Slab on Ground .............................................................................................................. 10
4.4 Bored Piers or Screw Piles .............................................................................................. 11
4.4.1 Pile Construction Considerations .......................................................................... 12
5. EXCAVATION, RETAINING WALL & LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES .............. 13
5.1 Temporary Cut Batter and Excavation ........................................................................... 13
5.2 Retaining Walls .............................................................................................................. 13
5.3 Basement Construction .................................................................................................. 14
6. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... 15
Table Index
Table 1: Summary of Sub-Surface Materials 5
Table 2: Summary of Soil Laboratory Test Results 6
Table 3: Soil Salinity Test Results 7
Table 4: Soil Aggressivity test results 8
Table 5: Estimated Geotechnical Design Parameters 9
Table 6: Allowable Bearing Capacities for Pad/Strip Footings 10
Table 7: Geotechnical parameters for Slab on Ground Footings 11
Table 8: Allowable Skin Friction and End Bearing Capacity 12
Table 9: Excavation classes as per SANS 1200D 13
Figures
Figure 1: Site Plan and Borehole Locations 3
Figure 2: Geology Map of the Site 4
Appendixes
Borehole Logs
Laboratory Test Results
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
2
1. INTRODUCTION
Geotesta was engaged by The Bathla Group to conduct a geotechnical investigation at
137 South Street, Marsden Park, NSW 2765. The proposed development includes low
density residential developments.
The field work was carried out on 14 Aug 2019. This report presents the geotechnical
investigation results including sub-surface soil profile with interpreted geotechnical
properties of the assessed subsurface lithology, chemical analysis in relation to salinity
and aggressivity, site classification based on AS2870 and recommendations on the
design parameters of footing, founding depth, geotechnical parameters including
allowable bearing capacity of shallow footing/slab, shaft friction and end bearing of
deep foundations.
This assessment has been carried out in general accordance with the following
guidelines:
• Australian Standard (AS1726) 2017: Geotechnical Site Investigation
• Australian Standard (AS2870) 2011: Residential Slabs and Footings
• Australian Standard (AS) 3600 (2009), Concrete Structures
• Salinity Code of Practice March 2003 (Amended January 2004)
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
3
2. FIELD INVESTIGATION
The investigation involved drilling of a total of four (4) boreholes to the depth of four
meters or refusal and four (4) DCP tests beside the boreholes for the proposed
residential development at 137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765. The area
investigated is highlighted in Figure 1 within the red line.
A site plan showing the borehole and DCP test locations is presented in Figure 1.
Borehole drilling was undertaken using a drilling rig PIXY 41T. All boreholes were
drilled using solid flight augering method.
The soil profiles encountered in the boreholes were logged by a Geotechnical Engineer
from Geotesta in accordance with Australian Standard AS 1726-2017. All the field
observations are presented on the borehole logs attached in Appendix A.
Denotes borehole locations
Figure 1: Site Plan and Borehole Locations
BH2
BH4
BH1
BH3
BH5
BH6
BH7
BH8
N
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
4
3. FINDINGS
3.1 Site Details, Location and Topography
The investigation area is situated in 137 South Street, Marsden Park, NSW 2765. The
site under investigation is located on the south side of South Street and, approximately
50 km (by road) northwest of Sydney CBD. The site location is shown in Figure 1. The
proposed site is occupied by several sheds and one residential one-story dwelling. The
property slopes gently from west to east.
The proposed site is a mixture of residential land with sheds and unoccupied land.
The site is roughly rectangular shape with an area of approximately 9200 m2.
The site lies at an elevation of approximately 21.5 metres above sea level (ASL)
referenced to Australian Height Datum (AHD) (http://en-au.topographic-map.com).
The site is within the Blacktown City Council.
3.2 Geology
The geological origin of the soil profile was identified from our visual examination of
the soil samples, geotechnical experience, and reference to geological maps of the area.
The geological map of the area indicates that the site is underlain by shale,
carbonaceous, claystone, claystone laminate, fine to medium grained lithic sandstone,
rare coal and tuff of the Wianamatta Group (Pernrith, 1:100000 Geological Sheet, 9030).
Geological Unit: Wianamatta Group (Rwb)- shale, carbonaceous, claystone, claystone laminate,
fine to medium grained lithic sandstone, rare coal and tuff
(Source: Geological Survey of NSW)
Figure 2: Geology Map of the Site
Subject Site
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
5
3.3 Soil/Rock Profile
The encountered soil profiles are presented in the borehole logs in Appendix A and
tabulated in detail in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Summary of Sub-Surface Materials
Borehole No. Depth (m) Soil/Rock Type Consistency/ Class
BH 1
0.0-0.2 Topsoil
0.2-1.0 FILL- silty CLAY with
sand and gravel compacted
1.0-5.2 Silty CLAY Stiff-Hard
Below 5.2 SILTSTONE (SHALE) Extremely to very low
strength
BH 2
0.0-0.2 Topsoil
0.2-0.7 FILL- silty CLAY with
sand and gravel compacted
0.7-3.2 Silty CLAY Stiff-Hard
Below 3.2 SILTSTONE (SHALE) Extremely to very low
strength
BH 3
0.0-0.2 Topsoil
0.2-0.8 FILL-silty CLAY with
sand and gravel compacted
0.8-3.7 Silty CLAY Very Stiff-Hard
Below 3.7 SILTSTONE (SHALE) Extremely to very low
strength
BH4
0.0-0.2 Topsoil
0.2-1.1 FILL- silty CLAY with
sand and gravel compacted
1.1-4.2 Silty CLAY Very Stiff-Hard
Below 4.2 SILTSTONE (SHALE) Extremely to very low
strength
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
6
3.4 Site Classification
After considering the area geology, the soil profile encountered in the bores; the site is
classified as CLASS ‘M’ with respect to foundation construction (Australian Standard
2870-2011 Residential Slabs and Footings). It is assumed that the founding depth is on
the natural ground.
It has been estimated that the Characteristic Surface Movement (ys) of the underlying
natural soil material will be in the range of 20-40mm provided the building site is
protected from “abnormal moisture conditions” and is drained as described in AS
2870.
It must be emphasized that the heave mentioned, and recommendations referred to in
this report are based solely on the observed soil profile observed at the time of the
investigation for this report, without taking into account any abnormal moisture
conditions as defined in AS2870 – 2011, Clause 1.3.3 that might be created thereafter.
With abnormal moisture conditions, distresses will occur and may result in “non-
acceptable probabilities of serviceability and safety of the building during its design
life,” as defined in AS2870-2011, Clause 1.3.1. If these distresses are not acceptable to
the builder, owner or other relevant parties then further fieldwork and revised footing
recommendations must be carried out.
3.5 Groundwater
Groundwater was not encountered in any of the boreholes.
3.6 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing
Three (3) representative soil samples were sent to Geotesta NATA accredited
laboratory for testing of index properties. The laboratory test results are summarised
in Table 2.
Table 2: Summary of Soil Laboratory Test Results
Bore No. Depth (m) Soil Type Wn % LL % PI % LS %
BH1 1.5 Silty CLAY N/A 50 36 12
BH3 1.8 Silty CLAY N/A 45 29 12
BH4 3.7 Silty CLAY N/A 63 43 12
Note: Wn= Moisture content; LL= Liquid Limit; PI= Plasticity Index; LS= Linear Shrinkage
Atterberg limit test results show the site profile comprises of high plasticity silty CLAY.
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
7
3.7 Laboratory Testing and Analysis–Salinity and Aggressivity
In addition to four boreholes drilled by drilling rig, six more boreholes were drilled by
hand auger to the maximum depth of 0.5m. A total of ten (10) soil samples were
submitted to Eurofin MGT Laboratory, a NATA accredited laboratory, for chemical
testings. The testings were carried out for salinity/aggresivity classification and to
assess exposure classification for the proposed development.
Sampling was targeted to achieve a representative coverage of site conditions in line
with assessed sub-surface profiles, proposed development, and the investigation
scope. Laboratory test certificates are presented in Appendix B.
Analysis Frequency Analyses
10 Samples Salinity suite including Electrical Conductivity (EC), pH, soluble
SO4
3.8 Salinity Assessment
Laboratory test results for salinity assessment are summarised in Table 3.
Table 3: Soil Salinity Test Results
Sample ID Conductivity (Ec) (1:5
Aqueous extract dS/m) Ece1 (ds/m)
Salinity
Classification2
BH2(0.3m) 0.12 1.08 Non-saline
BH1-S
(2.0m) 0.32 2.88 Slightly-saline
BH2-S
(0.8m) 0.75 6.75 Moderately-saline
BH3-S
(1.5m) 1.0 9.0 Very-saline
BH4-S
(3.5m) 0.96 8.64 Very-saline
BH6 (0.3m) 0.071 0.639 Non-saline
BH8 (0.2m) 0.28 2.52 Slightly-saline
Com3 (0.1m) 0.032 0.288 Non-saline
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
8
Sample ID Conductivity (Ec) (1:5
Aqueous extract dS/m) Ece1 (ds/m)
Salinity
Classification2
Com5 (0.2m) 0.041 0.369 Non-saline
Com7 (0.3m) 0.035 0.315 Non-saline
1Based on EC to ECe multiplication factors in Department of Land and Water Conservation (2002)
Guidelines (Table 6.1), a multiplication factor of 14 and 9 were applied to sandy loam and clay loam 2Based on Table 6.2 of Department of Land and Water Conservation (2002) where ECe < 2dS/m = Non-
saline; ECe= 2-4dS/m = slightly saline; ECe = 4-8dS/m = moderately saline; ECe = 8-16dS/m = very saline;
ECe > 16dS/m = highly saline.
Referring to the above test results the site is considered non-saline to very saline.
3.9 Aggressivity Aassessment
Sulphate and pH test results for exposure classification are summarised in Table 4.
Table 4: Soil Aggressivity test results
Sample ID
pH
(1:5 Aqueous
extract)
Sulphate (SO4)
(mg/kg)
Aggressivity
Classification1
BH2(0.3m) 7.6 260 Non-Aggressive
BH1-S (2.0m) 5.6 160 Non-Aggressive
BH2-S (0.8m) 4.6 610 Mild-Aggressive
BH3-S (1.5m) 5.0 270 Mild-Aggressive
BH4-S (3.5m) 7.0 270 Non-Aggressive
BH6 (0.3m) 7.5 <30 Non-Aggressive
BH8 (0.2m) 7.9 89 Non-Aggressive
Com3 (0.1m) 7.0 56 Non-Aggressive
Com5 (0.2m) 7.1 <30 Non-Aggressive
Com7 (0.3m) 6.3 <30 Non-Aggressive
1In accordance with AS3600 (2009) and AS2159 (2009)
Referring to the above test results, the site is considered non-aggressive to mild-
aggressive for concrete piles and steel piles.
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
9
3.10 Exposure Classifications for concrete in Saline and sulfate soils
The site soil is considered none-saline to very saline and Non-aggressive to mild-
aggressive to concrete. An exposure classification of A2 for concrete in saline soils and
an exposure classification of A2 for concrete and steel in sulphate soils should be
adopted for preliminary design of proposed concrete structures.
In addition to the saline soil management strategies to be required for this site, we
recommend design of new structures should consider the following minimum
requirements: • Limiting soil disturbance, such as cut and fill, so saline or sodic subsoils are not exposed,
or groundwater is not intercepted.
• Using exposure grade bricks/masonry below damp course or in retaining walls.
• Providing concrete strength and cover to steel reinforcing in accordance with AS 3600
(2009) and the exposure classifications outlined above.
• Limiting excess surface water infiltration into the soil by designing, installing and
maintaining appropriate stormwater drainage (gutters, downpipes, pits and pipes).
• Further assessment including laboratory testing, to improve characterisation of site
salinity conditions, particularly in proposed development areas, and assess potential
ensuing implications on the proposed development and mitigation requirements
4. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATION
4.1 Geotechnical Design Parameters
The estimated geotechnical parameters of soil/rock materials encountered in the site is
provided in Table 5:
Table 5: Estimated Geotechnical Design Parameters
Soil Type γ
(kN/m3)
Su
(kPa)
c’
(kPa)
Φ’ E’
(MPa)
ν'
Silty CLAY (stiff) 19 50 5 28 15 0.3
Silty CLAY (very stiff -Hard) 20 150 8 28 40 0.3
Shale (Siltstone) (Extremely to
very low strength) 22 - 40 29 140 0.3
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
10
4.2 Strip/Pad Footing System
It is recommended that an engineer designed strip/pad footing system for a Class M site be
used on this site except. We recommend that the designing engineer refer to AS2870-2011 to
ensure design compliance to this document.
The strip footings should be founded in the natural soil layer and penetrate through any fill
material, tree roots and founded at least 100mm into the recommended founding material. As
a guide with information obtained from the bores and DCP tests, the actual founding depth
for strip/pad footings at the test locations should be as follow:
Table 6: Allowable Bearing Capacities for Pad/Strip Footings
Borehole
No.
Founding Depth
(mm) Founding Material
Allowable Bearing
Capacity (kPa)
BH1
1000 Silty CLAY (Very Stiff) 180
2100 Silty CLAY (Very Stiff-
Hard) 330
>5200 Shale (Siltstone) 600
BH2-BH4
1000 Silty CLAY (Very Stiff) 180
1400 Silty CLAY (Very Stiff-
Hard) 330
>3200 Shale (Siltstone) 600
The founding depth should be as stipulated above or to hard layer, whichever is encountered
first. It should be noted that the soil profile may vary across the site. The foundation depths
quoted in this report are measured from the surface during our testing and may vary
accordingly if any filling or excavation works are carried out. It is recommended that a
geotechnical engineer be engaged during footing excavation stage to confirm the founding
depth and founding material.
4.3 Slab on Ground
It is recommended that an engineer designed slab on ground footing system for a Class M site
be used on this site. We recommend that the designing engineer refer to AS2870-2011 to
ensure design compliance to this document.
The edge and load bearing beams for the slab footings should be founded in the natural soil
layer and penetrate through any fill material, tree roots and founded at least 100 mm into the
recommended founding material. As a guide with information obtained from the bores and
DCP tests the actual founding depth for edge and load bearing beams at the test locations
should be as follows:
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
11
Table 7: Geotechnical parameters for Slab on Ground Footings
Borehole
No.
Founding Depth
(mm) Founding Material
Allowable Bearing
Capacity (kPa)
BH1
1000 Silty CLAY (Very Stiff) 150
2100 Silty CLAY (Very Stiff-
Hard) 300
BH2-4
1000 Silty CLAY (Very Stiff) 150
1400 Silty CLAY (Very Stiff-
Hard) 300
It should be noted that the soil profile may vary across the site. The foundation depths quoted
in this report are measured from the surface during our testing and may vary accordingly if
any filling or excavation works are carried out. It is recommended that a geotechnical engineer
be engaged during footing excavation stage to confirm the founding depth and founding
material.
Slab panels and internal beams can be founded in the natural soil profile or in compacted
surface filling and/or as required in the design by engineering principles. Compacted filling
used to raise levels beneath panels must be placed and compacted as per specifications for
controlled or rolled fill.
Controlled fill is material that has been placed and compacted in layers by compaction
equipment within a defined moisture range to a defined density requirement. Except as
provided below, controlled fill shall be placed in accordance with AS 3798.
If more than 400mm of CLAY FILL or 800mm of SAND FILL, imported or site derived,
including existing FILL material, is required, then the slab must be designed as a suspended
slab and supported by a grid of beams founded through any fill material in accordance with
the above edge beam recommendations.
4.4 Bored Piers or Screw Piles
Bored piers or Screw piles can be used to support the proposed residential units. The
pier/pile foundation of the proposed structure is assumed to be a high redundancy
system and the intrinsic test factor (фtf) is assumed to be equal to basic geotechnical
strength reduction factor (фgb), in accordance to AS2159-2009. The overall design
average risk rating (ARR) is to be calculated by the designer and the corresponding
geotechnical strength reduction shall be adopted.
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
12
Table 8: Allowable Skin Friction and End Bearing Capacity
Borehole No. Depth
(m) Soil Type
Allowable Skin
Friction
(kPa)
Allowable End
Bearing Capacity
(kPa)
BH1
1.1 Silty CLAY (very stiff) 20 300
2.2 Silty CLAY (Hard) 30 600
Below
5.2m Siltstone (Shale) 25 700
4.4.1 Pile Construction Considerations
Where necessary and appropriate, at contractor’s discretion, a temporary casing may be used
to prevent the pile excavation from collapsing. The inside of the casing must be clean and free
of any projections (such as weld backing bars) which could be an obstacle to the placing and
positioning of the reinforcement cage for the piles. Temporary casings may be left in place
provided that the minimum socket length is not cased and the minimum cover to
reinforcement is maintained. Where a casing is left in place, gaps between the casing and the
sides of excavations shall be filled with sand and compact the sand by flooding. In the case of
piles subject to high lateral loads (e.g. abutment piles and anchor pier piles), fill such gaps with
a cementitious grout containing fine aggregates proportioned to produce a pourable liquid
without segregation, with a compressive strength at 28 days not less than 10MPa when
sampled and tested to Test Method RMS T375. Cement used for the grout must conform to
Specification RMS 3211.
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
13
5. EXCAVATION, RETAINING WALL & LATERAL EARTH
PRESSURES
5.1 Temporary Cut Batter and Excavation
Excavation in the stiff to hard clay can be undertaken to 3m depth with 1V:2H batter.
The above recommendation assumes that there is no existing structure adjacent to the
excavation area. Even at the above cut batters it should be noted that following rainy
periods, some degree of fretting and minor slumping could be anticipated.
The batter slope angle is recommended subjected to the following measures:
• The batters should be protected against erosion
• Permanent batters should be drained
• Temporary batters shall not be left unsupported for more than 2 months without
further advice. Following heavy rains (raining more than 6 hours with the
intensity of greater than 15mm/day) should be inspected by a geotechnical
engineer.
• An offset distance of 1.5m from the batter crest should be maintained for the
loads.
Soft and Intermediate excavation condition is expected in clay and shale respectively.
The table below describes the excavation classes as per SANS 1200D.
Table 9: Excavation classes as per SANS 1200D
Excavation Class Description
Soft Excavation in material that can be efficiently removed by a back-acting excavator
of flywheel power approximately 0.10kW per millimetre of tined-bucket width,
without the use of pneumatic tools such as paving breakers
Intermediate Excavation in material that requires a back-acting excavator of flywheel power
exceeding 0.10 kW per millimetre of tined-bucket width or the use of pneumatic
tools before removal by equipment equivalent to that specified for soft excavation.
Hard Hard rock excavation shall be excavation in material (excluding boulder
excavation) that cannot be efficiently removed without blasting or wedging and
splitting.
5.2 Retaining Walls
Any proposed retaining walls at the site should be engineer designed adopting the
geotechnical parameters summarised in Table 5 above.
For construction methods which minimise deflection and where restraint is applied via struts,
bracings or anchors, the temporary or short-term lateral earth pressure distribution should be
approximated as a trapezoidal distribution behind the retaining wall. A maximum lateral earth
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
14
pressure of 8H kPa is obtained at a depth of 0.25H, and where H is the total depth of the
excavation to be retained. For basement walls where wall deflections are not critical, the
maximum lateral earth pressure may be reduced to 6H kPa.
It must be emphasised that where adjoining footings exist near the retaining walls, the “at rest”
earth pressures must be maintained, and the active design condition is not appropriate.
5.3 Basement Construction
In the event of rising ground water, under-slab drainage should be provided to the pit to
prevent hydrostatic build-up.
Preparation of the basement floor subgrade should consist of stripping to grade and proof
rolling the subgrade, ensuring that any localized soft spots are removed and made good with
clean granular filling compacted to a dry density not less than 98% of the maximum dry
density value determined by the Standard Compaction test in accordance with Australian
Standard AS1289 5.1.1 -2017.
DOCUMENT CONTROL
Date Version Report Prepared By: Report Reviewed by:
27 August 2019 Hassan Ghafouri
BEng MEng MIEAust
Geotechnical Engineer
Mohammad Hossein Bazyar
BEng MEng Ph.D MIEAust
CPEng NER
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
15
6. REFERENCES
• Australian Standard (2017), Geotechnical Site Investigations (AS1726).
• Australian Standard (2009), Piling - Design and Installation (AS2159).
• Australian Standard (2011), Residential Slabs and Footings (AS2870)
• Australian Standard (2002), Earth-retaining Structures (AS4678).
• Australian Standard (2004), Bridge Design Part 5: Concrete (AS5100.5).
• Pells, P.J.N., Mostyn, G., Walker, B.F. (1998) Design Loadings for Foundations on Shale and
Sandstone in the Sydney Region.
• National Environment Protection Council, December 1999. National Environment
Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure.
• Australian Standard AS 3600: 2009, Concrete Structures
• Department of Land and Water Conservation (DLWC, 2002) Site investigations for urban
salinity.
• CSIRO BTF 18 (2003) Foundation Maintenance and Footing Performance: A homeowner’s
Guide.
• Department of Infrastructure Planning and Natural Resources (DIPNR, 2002) Salinity
Potential in Western Sydney Map.
• Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils (WSROC, 2003) Western Sydney
Salinity Code of Practice.
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
16
Information about This Report
The report contains the results of Soil and water quality Assessment conducted for a specific
purpose and client. The results should not be used by other parties, or for other purposes, as
they may contain neither adequate nor appropriate information.
Test Hole Logging
The information on the test hole logs (boreholes, test pits, exposures etc.) is based on a visual
and tactile assessment, except at the discrete locations where test information is available (field
and/or laboratory results). The test hole logs include both factual data and inferred
information.
Groundwater
Unless otherwise indicated, the water levels presented on the test hole logs are the levels of
free water or seepage in the test hole recorded at the given time of measuring. The actual
groundwater level may differ from this recorded level depending on material permeability
(i.e. depending on response time of the measuring instrument). Further, variations of this level
could occur with time due to such effects as seasonal, environmental and tidal fluctuations or
construction activities. Confirmation of groundwater levels, pheratic surfaces or piezometric
pressures can only be made by appropriate instrumentation techniques and monitoring
programmes.
Interpretation of Results
The discussion or recommendations contained within this report normally are based on a site
evaluation from discrete test hole data. Generalised, idealised or inferred subsurface
conditions (including any geotechnical cross-sections) have been assumed or prepared by
interpolation and/or extrapolation of these data. As such these conditions are an interpretation
and must be considered as a guide only.
Change in Conditions
Local variations or anomalies in the generalised ground conditions do occur in the natural
environment, particularly between discrete test hole locations. Additionally, certain design or
construction procedures may have been assumed in assessing the soil-structure interaction
behaviour of the site. Furthermore, conditions may change at the site from those encountered
at the time of the geotechnical investigation through construction activities and constantly
changing natural forces.
Any change in design, in construction methods, or in ground conditions as noted during
construction, from those assumed or reported should be referred to GEOTESTA for
appropriate assessment and comment.
Reproduction of Reports
Where it is desired to reproduce the information contained in our geotechnical report, or other
technical information, for the inclusion in contract documents or engineering specification of
the subject development, such reproductions should include at least all of the relevant test
hole and test data, together with the appropriate standard description sheets and remarks
made in the written report of a factual or descriptive nature. Reports are the subject of
copyright and shall not be reproduced without the permission of Geotesta.
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
17
Appendix A
Borehole Logs
Page: 1 of 6
Client: Drilling Co:Project: Driller:Job No: Rig Type:Location: Inclination:Date Drilled: Bearing: Checked by:
Top soil, silty sand with clay, Grass on top surface
Fill Fill material, silty CLAY with SAND and GRAVEL, brown
Cl Residual, silty CLAY, red-brown, grey, very stiff, medium plasticity,
Silty CLAY with rock fragments, gery, orange, hard M-D
consistency: relative density: moisture: Notes:
VS very soft VL very loose D Dry
S soft L loose M Moist No groundwater was encounteredF firm MD medium dense W Wet Disturbed SampleST stiff D dense S SaturatedVST very stiff VD very dense water: sampling / testing:H hard water level intact sample from core Standard Penetration Test
soil classification: level risen to B Bulk samplesoil is classified in accordance with AS1726 Supp Su from Pocket Penetrometerunless otherwise noted water inflow Suv Su from Field Vane Shear test
Silty CLAY, gery, orange, medium to high plasticity, hard
GEOTESTA PTY LTD
5.00
3.00
5.00
T intact tube sample
4.50 4.50
4.00 4.00
3.50 3.50
66
2.00 6
3.00
91.50 7
DCP Refusal
1.50
1.00 878
1.3 9
2.00
9131822
2.50 2.50
108
5
22
2
5M 2
4
0.00
So
lid F
ligh
t Au
ge
r
M-D 0.00
Wa
ter
Le
vels
De
pth
(m
)
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FIELD TESTSType, colour, particle size and shape, structure & NOTES
M
M
6
3
VST
H
0.50
1.00
20.50
Test Method: AS 1289.6.3.2-1997 & AS 1726-2017
De
pth
(m
)
Dril
ling
Me
tho
d
Gra
ph
ic L
og
Gro
up
Sym
bo
l
Mo
istu
re
Co
nsi
ste
ncy
/
Str
en
gth
DC
Pb
low
s/1
00
mm
Sa
mp
ling
/ R
un
s
137 South Street, Marsden Park Vertical Collar RL:14/8/2019 Vertical Logged by: H.Gh MB
Geotechnical Assessment Ali Northing: See attached PlanNE540 Pixy 41T Grid Ref:
BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE No: BH 1
Bathla Group - Easting: See attached Plan
Page: 2 of 6
Client: Drilling Co:Project: Driller:Job No: Rig Type:Location: Inclination:Date Drilled: Bearing: Checked by:
Silty CLAY, gery, orange, medium to high plasticity
SH Shale/siltstone, very low strength, grey, brown
consistency: relative density: moisture: Notes:
VS very soft VL very loose D Dry
S soft L loose M Moist No groundwater was encounteredF firm MD medium dense W Wet Disturbed SampleST stiff D dense S SaturatedVST very stiff VD very dense water: sampling / testing:H hard water level intact sample from core Standard Penetration Test
soil classification: level risen to B Bulk samplesoil is classified in accordance with AS1726 Supp Su from Pocket Penetrometerunless otherwise noted water inflow Suv Su from Field Vane Shear test
Geotechnical Assessment Ali Northing: See attached PlanNE540 Pixy 41T Grid Ref:
BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE No: BH 1
Bathla Group - Easting: See attached Plan
137 South Street, Marsden Park Vertical Collar RL:14/8/2019 Vertical Logged by: H.Gh MB
Wa
ter
Le
vels
De
pth
(m
)
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FIELD TESTSType, colour, particle size and shape, structure & NOTES
Test Method: AS 1289.6.3.2-1997 & AS 1726-2017
De
pth
(m
)
Dril
ling
Me
tho
d
Gra
ph
ic L
og
Gro
up
Sym
bo
l
Mo
istu
re
Co
nsi
ste
ncy
/
Str
en
gth
DC
Pb
low
s/1
00
mm
Sa
mp
ling
/ R
un
s
5.00
So
lid F
ligh
t Au
ge
r
M-D 5.00
VL
5.50
6.00
6.50
1.3
6.50
7.50 7.50
7.00 7.00
8.00 8.00
8.50 8.50
9.00 9.00
9.50
T intact tube sample
GEOTESTA PTY LTD
Drilling terminated @ 5.4m Refusal 5.50
6.00
10.0010.00
9.50
Page: 3 of 6
Client: Drilling Co:Project: Driller:Job No: Rig Type:Location: Inclination:Date Drilled: Bearing: Checked by:
Top soil, silty sand with clay, Grass on top surface
Fill Fill material, silty CLAY with SAND and GRAVEL, brown
Cl Residual, silty CLAY, red-brown, grey, stiff to very stiff, medium plasticity,
Silty CLAY with rock fragments, gery, orange, hard,medium plasticity
Silty CLAY, gery, orange, medium to high plasticity
consistency: relative density: moisture: Notes:
VS very soft VL very loose D Dry
S soft L loose M Moist No groundwater was encounteredF firm MD medium dense W Wet Disturbed SampleST stiff D dense S SaturatedVST very stiff VD very dense water: sampling / testing:H hard water level intact sample from core Standard Penetration Test
soil classification: level risen to B Bulk samplesoil is classified in accordance with AS1726 Supp Su from Pocket Penetrometerunless otherwise noted water inflow Suv Su from Field Vane Shear test
Geotechnical Assessment Ali Northing: See attached PlanNE540 Pixy 41T Grid Ref:
BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE No: BH 2
Bathla Group - Easting: See attached Plan
137 South Street, Marsden Park Vertical Collar RL:14/8/2019 Vertical Logged by: H.Gh MB
Wa
ter
Le
vels
De
pth
(m
)
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FIELD TESTSType, colour, particle size and shape, structure & NOTES
Test Method: AS 1289.6.3.2-1997 & AS 1726-2017
De
pth
(m
)
Dril
ling
Me
tho
d
Gra
ph
ic L
og
Gro
up
Sym
bo
l
Mo
istu
re
Co
nsi
ste
ncy
/
Str
en
gth
DC
Pb
low
s/1
00
mm
Sa
mp
ling
/ R
un
s
0.00
So
lid F
ligh
t Au
ge
r
M-D 3 0.00
3M
0.50 2 0.50
2
222
31.00 VST 5
2St 4
1.50
17
1.00
M
89
11H
2.00
81.50 12
2.50
2.00
H
M
2.50
3.00 3.00
3.50 3.50
Shale/siltstone, very low strength, grey, brown D VL
4.50
4.00 VL 4.00
5.00
T intact tube sample
GEOTESTA PTY LTD
SH
Shale/(siltstone), very low/low strength, brown, dark grey
Drilling terminated @ 4.2m
D
5.00
4.50
Page: 4 of 6
Client: Drilling Co:Project: Driller:Job No: Rig Type:Location: Inclination:Date Drilled: Bearing: Checked by:
Top soil, silty sand with clay, Grass on top surface
Fill Fill material, silty CLAY with SAND and GRAVEL, brown
Cl Residual, silty CLAY, red-brown, grey, orange, hard, medium plasticity,
Silty CLAY with rock fragments, red- brown, hard medium plasticity
consistency: relative density: moisture: Notes:
VS very soft VL very loose D Dry
S soft L loose M Moist No groundwater was encounteredF firm MD medium dense W Wet Disturbed SampleST stiff D dense S SaturatedVST very stiff VD very dense water: sampling / testing:H hard water level intact sample from core Standard Penetration Test
soil classification: level risen to B Bulk samplesoil is classified in accordance with AS1726 Supp Su from Pocket Penetrometerunless otherwise noted water inflow Suv Su from Field Vane Shear test
Geotechnical Assessment Ali Northing: See attached PlanNE540 Pixy 41T Grid Ref:
BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE No: BH 3
Bathla Group - Easting: See attached Plan
137 South Street, Marsden Park Vertical Collar RL:14/8/2019 Vertical Logged by: H.Gh MB
Wa
ter
Le
vels
De
pth
(m
)
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FIELD TESTSType, colour, particle size and shape, structure & NOTES
Test Method: AS 1289.6.3.2-1997 & AS 1726-2017
De
pth
(m
)
Dril
ling
Me
tho
d
Gra
ph
ic L
og
Gro
up
Sym
bo
l
Mo
istu
re
Co
nsi
ste
ncy
/
Str
en
gth
DC
Pb
low
s/1
00
mm
Sa
mp
ling
/ R
un
s
0.00
So
lid F
ligh
t Au
ge
r
M-D 6 0.00
4M
0.50
4
334
45
0.50 3
1.50
1.00
M
1014
1.3 14
VST 81.00 8
2.00
1.50
2.50
2.00
3.00
M
3.50 3.50
4.50
4.00 4.00
5.00
T intact tube sample
GEOTESTA PTY LTD
Shale/siltstone, very low strength, grey, brown
Drilling terminated @ 4.2m
H
5.00
4.50
SH D VL
3.00
2.50
Page: 5 of 6
Client: Drilling Co:Project: Driller:Job No: Rig Type:Location: Inclination:Date Drilled: Bearing: Checked by:
Top soil, silty sand with clay, Grass on top surface
Fill Fill material, silty CLAY with SAND and GRAVEL, brown
Cl Residual, silty CLAY, brown, grey, very stiff, medium plasticity,
Silty CLAY, gery, orange, medium to high plasticity, hard
Silty CLAY with rock fragments, gery, orange, hard M-Dmedium plasticity
Dto dark grey
consistency: relative density: moisture: Notes:
VS very soft VL very loose D Dry
S soft L loose M Moist No groundwater was encounteredF firm MD medium dense W Wet Disturbed SampleST stiff D dense S SaturatedVST very stiff VD very dense water: sampling / testing:H hard water level intact sample from core Standard Penetration Test
soil classification: level risen to B Bulk samplesoil is classified in accordance with AS1726 Supp Su from Pocket Penetrometerunless otherwise noted water inflow Suv Su from Field Vane Shear test
Geotechnical Assessment Ali Northing: See attached PlanNE540 Pixy 41T Grid Ref:
BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE No: BH 4
Bathla Group - Easting: See attached Plan
137 South Street, Marsden Park Vertical Collar RL:14/8/2019 Vertical Logged by: H.Gh MB
Wa
ter
Le
vels
De
pth
(m
)
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FIELD TESTSType, colour, particle size and shape, structure & NOTES
Test Method: AS 1289.6.3.2-1997 & AS 1726-2017
De
pth
(m
)
Dril
ling
Me
tho
d
Gra
ph
ic L
og
Gro
up
Sym
bo
l
Mo
istu
re
Co
nsi
ste
ncy
/
Str
en
gth
DC
Pb
low
s/1
00
mm
Sa
mp
ling
/ R
un
s
0.00
So
lid F
ligh
t Au
ge
r
M-D 5 0.00
3M
0.50 6 0.50
8
333
41.00 4
45
1.50
12
1.00
510
1.3 12
22
2.00
71.50 8
2.50
DCP Refusal
2.50
2.00
H
3.00
M
3.50 3.50
4.50
SH EL-VL
4.00 4.00
5.00
T intact tube sample
GEOTESTA PTY LTD
M VST
H
Shale/siltstone, very low strength, grey
5.00
4.50
3.00
Page: 6 of 6
Client: Drilling Co:Project: Driller:Job No: Rig Type:Location: Inclination:Date Drilled: Bearing: Checked by:
Shale/siltstone, very low strength, grey, brown
Shale/siltstone, very low/low strength, grey, brown
consistency: relative density: moisture: Notes:
VS very soft VL very loose D Dry
S soft L loose M Moist No groundwater was encounteredF firm MD medium dense W Wet Disturbed SampleST stiff D dense S SaturatedVST very stiff VD very dense water: sampling / testing:H hard water level intact sample from core Standard Penetration Test
soil classification: level risen to B Bulk samplesoil is classified in accordance with AS1726 Supp Su from Pocket Penetrometerunless otherwise noted water inflow Suv Su from Field Vane Shear test
Geotechnical Assessment Ali Northing: See attached PlanNE540 Pixy 41T Grid Ref:
BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE No: BH 4
Bathla Group - Easting: See attached Plan
137 South Street, Marsden Park Vertical Collar RL:14/8/2019 Vertical Logged by: H.Gh MB
Wa
ter
Le
vels
De
pth
(m
)
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FIELD TESTSType, colour, particle size and shape, structure & NOTES
Test Method: AS 1289.6.3.2-1997 & AS 1726-2017
De
pth
(m
)
Dril
ling
Me
tho
d
Gra
ph
ic L
og
Gro
up
Sym
bo
l
Mo
istu
re
Co
nsi
ste
ncy
/
Str
en
gth
DC
Pb
low
s/1
00
mm
Sa
mp
ling
/ R
un
s
5.00
So
lid F
ligh
t Au
ge
r
D EL-VL 5.00
5.50
VL5.50 Drilling terminated @ 5.4m Refusal
6.00
1.3
6.50
6.00
7.50
7.00 7.00
6.50
8.00
8.50 8.50
9.50
9.00 9.00
10.00
T intact tube sample
GEOTESTA PTY LTD
SH
10.00
9.50
8.00
7.50
137 South Street Marsden Park NSW 2765 NE540
18
Appendix B
Laboratory Test Results
Certificate of Analysis
Geotesta Pty Ltd (NSW)
Unit 20, 1 Talavera Rd
Macquarie Park
NSW 2113
Attention: - Mohammad Hossein Bazyar
Report 671791-S
Project name 137 SOUTH STREET - MARSDEN PARK
Project ID NE540
Received Date Aug 14, 2019
Client Sample ID BH1 BH2 BH3 BH4
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. M19-Au24439 M19-Au24440 M19-Au24441 M19-Au24442
Date Sampled Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 - - < 20
TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 - - < 20
TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 - - < 50
TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 - - < 50
TRH C10-C36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 - - < 50
BTEX
Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - < 0.1
Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - < 0.1
Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - < 0.1
m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - < 0.2
o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - < 0.1
Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 - - < 0.3
4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 108 - - 74
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5
TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 - - < 20
TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 - - < 20
TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 - - < 50
TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 - - < 50
TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 - - < 100
TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 - - < 100
TRH >C10-C40 (total)* 100 mg/kg < 100 - - < 100
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - 0.6 - -
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - 1.2 - -
Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 1 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
NATA AccreditedAccreditation Number 1261Site Number 1254
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 – TestingThe results of the tests, calibrations and/ormeasurements included in this document are traceableto Australian/national standards.
Client Sample ID BH1 BH2 BH3 BH4
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. M19-Au24439 M19-Au24440 M19-Au24441 M19-Au24442
Date Sampled Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -
2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % - 77 - -
p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % - 80 - -
Organochlorine Pesticides
Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 -
4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Methoxychlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 - < 1 -
Aldrin and Dieldrin (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
DDT + DDE + DDD (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Vic EPA IWRG 621 OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 -
Vic EPA IWRG 621 Other OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 -
Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 80 - 76 -
Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 90 - 85 -
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Coumaphos 2 mg/kg < 2 - < 2 -
Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 2 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Client Sample ID BH1 BH2 BH3 BH4
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. M19-Au24439 M19-Au24440 M19-Au24441 M19-Au24442
Date Sampled Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
EPN 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Malathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg < 2 - < 2 -
Naled 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Omethoate 2 mg/kg < 2 - < 2 -
Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 116 - 106 -
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) 10 uS/cm - 120 - -
pH (1:5 Aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) 0.1 pH Units - 7.6 - -
Sulphate (as SO4) 30 mg/kg - 260 - -
% Moisture 1 % 15 18 15 15
Heavy Metals
Arsenic 2 mg/kg 56 - 28 -
Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 - < 0.4 -
Chromium 5 mg/kg 51 - 37 -
Copper 5 mg/kg 34 - 50 -
Lead 5 mg/kg 40 - 39 -
Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 -
Nickel 5 mg/kg 23 - 21 -
Zinc 5 mg/kg 65 - 89 -
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 3 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Client Sample ID BH1-S BH2-S BH3-S BH4-S
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. M19-Au24443 M19-Au24444 M19-Au24445 M19-Au24446
Date Sampled Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) 5 uS/cm 320 750 1000 960
pH (1:5 Aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) 0.1 pH Units 5.6 4.6 5.0 7.0
Sulphate (as SO4) 10 mg/kg 160 610 270 270
% Moisture 1 % 14 18 15 16
Client Sample ID BH5 BH6 BH7 BH8
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. M19-Au24447 M19-Au24448 M19-Au24449 M19-Au24450
Date Sampled Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 - < 20 -
TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 - < 20 -
TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50 -
TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50 -
TRH C10-C36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50 -
BTEX
Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 -
Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 -
Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 -
m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 -
Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 - < 0.3 -
4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 111 - 92 -
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 -
TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 - < 20 -
TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 - < 20 -
TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50 -
TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50 -
TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 - < 100 -
TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 - < 100 -
TRH >C10-C40 (total)* 100 mg/kg < 100 - < 100 -
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - 0.6 - 0.6
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - 1.2 - 1.2
Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 4 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Client Sample ID BH5 BH6 BH7 BH8
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. M19-Au24447 M19-Au24448 M19-Au24449 M19-Au24450
Date Sampled Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5
2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % - 89 - 78
p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % - 95 - 86
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) 10 uS/cm - 71 - 280
pH (1:5 Aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) 0.1 pH Units - 7.5 - 7.9
Sulphate (as SO4) 30 mg/kg - < 30 - 89
% Moisture 1 % 15 7.7 13 16
Heavy Metals
Arsenic 2 mg/kg 26 - - -
Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 - - -
Chromium 5 mg/kg 35 - - -
Copper 5 mg/kg 37 - - -
Lead 5 mg/kg 56 - - -
Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -
Nickel 5 mg/kg 18 - - -
Zinc 5 mg/kg 170 - - -
Client Sample ID COM1 COM3 COM4 COM5
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. M19-Au24451 M19-Au24452 M19-Au24453 M19-Au24454
Date Sampled Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 - -
TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 - -
TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 - -
TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 - -
TRH C10-C36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 - -
BTEX
Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -
Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -
Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -
m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -
o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -
Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 - - -
4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 110 - - -
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 - -
TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 - -
TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 - -
TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 - -
TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 - -
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 5 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Client Sample ID COM1 COM3 COM4 COM5
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. M19-Au24451 M19-Au24452 M19-Au24453 M19-Au24454
Date Sampled Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 - -
TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 - -
TRH >C10-C40 (total)* 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 - -
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - - - 0.6
Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - - - 1.2
Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5
2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % - - - 121
p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % - - - 129
Organochlorine Pesticides
Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 -
4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg 0.06 - 0.18 -
4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Methoxychlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 - < 1 -
Aldrin and Dieldrin (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 6 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Client Sample ID COM1 COM3 COM4 COM5
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. M19-Au24451 M19-Au24452 M19-Au24453 M19-Au24454
Date Sampled Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Organochlorine Pesticides
DDT + DDE + DDD (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg 0.06 - 0.18 -
Vic EPA IWRG 621 OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - 0.18 -
Vic EPA IWRG 621 Other OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 -
Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 69 - 72 -
Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 81 - 81 -
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Coumaphos 2 mg/kg < 2 - < 2 -
Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
EPN 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Malathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg < 2 - < 2 -
Naled 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Omethoate 2 mg/kg < 2 - < 2 -
Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 103 - 110 -
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) 10 uS/cm - 32 - 41
pH (1:5 Aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) 0.1 pH Units - 7.0 - 7.1
Sulphate (as SO4) 30 mg/kg - 56 - < 30
% Moisture 1 % 13 11 10 12
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 7 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Client Sample ID COM1 COM3 COM4 COM5
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. M19-Au24451 M19-Au24452 M19-Au24453 M19-Au24454
Date Sampled Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Heavy Metals
Arsenic 2 mg/kg 36 15 - 25
Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 - < 0.4
Chromium 5 mg/kg 50 26 - 41
Copper 5 mg/kg 27 23 - 34
Lead 5 mg/kg 37 46 - 64
Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 - < 0.1
Nickel 5 mg/kg 15 14 - 18
Zinc 5 mg/kg 71 85 - 130
Client Sample ID COM6 COM7 COM8 D1
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. M19-Au24455 M19-Au24456 M19-Au24457 M19-Au24458
Date Sampled Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
BTEX
Benzene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 - -
Toluene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 - -
Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 - -
m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - -
o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 - -
Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg - < 0.3 - -
4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % - 108 - -
Organochlorine Pesticides
Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 -
4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg 0.60 - < 0.05 -
4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Methoxychlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 - < 1 -
Aldrin and Dieldrin (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -
DDT + DDE + DDD (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg 0.6 - < 0.05 -
Vic EPA IWRG 621 OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg 0.6 - < 0.1 -
Vic EPA IWRG 621 Other OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 -
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 8 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Client Sample ID COM6 COM7 COM8 D1
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. M19-Au24455 M19-Au24456 M19-Au24457 M19-Au24458
Date Sampled Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Organochlorine Pesticides
Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 73 - 125 -
Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 80 - 90 -
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Coumaphos 2 mg/kg < 2 - < 2 -
Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
EPN 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Malathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg < 2 - < 2 -
Naled 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Omethoate 2 mg/kg < 2 - < 2 -
Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -
Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 109 - 118 -
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) 10 uS/cm - 35 - -
pH (1:5 Aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) 0.1 pH Units - 6.3 - -
Sulphate (as SO4) 30 mg/kg - < 30 - -
% Moisture 1 % 19 7.6 12 16
Heavy Metals
Arsenic 2 mg/kg - 11 - 26
Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg - < 0.4 - < 0.4
Chromium 5 mg/kg - 23 - 34
Copper 5 mg/kg - 19 - 48
Lead 5 mg/kg - 25 - 66
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 9 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Client Sample ID COM6 COM7 COM8 D1
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. M19-Au24455 M19-Au24456 M19-Au24457 M19-Au24458
Date Sampled Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019 Aug 14, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Heavy Metals
Mercury 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 - < 0.1
Nickel 5 mg/kg - 15 - 25
Zinc 5 mg/kg - 68 - 170
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 10 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Sample HistoryWhere samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported.A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However,no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results.
If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.
Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Aug 19, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Aug 19, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Aug 19, 2019
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
BTEX Melbourne Aug 19, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Melbourne Aug 19, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2130 PAH and Phenols in Soil and Water
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) Melbourne Aug 19, 2019 7 Days
- Method: LTM-INO-4030 Conductivity
pH (1:5 Aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) Melbourne Aug 19, 2019 7 Days
- Method: LTM-GEN-7090 pH in soil by ISE
Sulphate (as SO4) Melbourne Aug 19, 2019 28 Days
- Method: LTM-INO-4110 Sulfate by Discrete Analyser
- Method: E045 Anions by Ion Chromatography
Metals M8 Melbourne Aug 20, 2019 180 Days
- Method: LTM-MET-3040 Metals in Waters, Soils & Sediments by ICP-MS
Eurofins | mgt Suite B14
Organochlorine Pesticides Melbourne Aug 19, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2220 OCP & PCB in Soil and Water (USEPA 8270)
Organophosphorus Pesticides Melbourne Aug 19, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2200 Organophosphorus Pesticides by GC-MS (USEPA 8081)
% Moisture Melbourne Aug 16, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-GEN-7080 Moisture
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 11 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Geotesta Pty Ltd (NSW) Order No.: Received: Aug 14, 2019 3:58 PMAddress: Unit 20, 1 Talavera Rd Report #: 671791 Due: Aug 21, 2019
Macquarie Park Phone: 1300852 216 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2113 Fax: Contact Name: - Mohammad Hossein Bazyar
Project Name: 137 SOUTH STREET - MARSDEN PARKProject ID: NE540
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Asim Khan
Sample Detail
Asbestos - A
S4964
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C
asrec.)
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C
asrec.)
HO
LD
pH (1:5 A
queous extract at 25°C as rec.)
pH (1:5 A
queous extract at 25°C as rec.)
Sulphate (as S
O4)
Sulphate (as S
O4)
Polycyclic A
romatic H
ydrocarbons
Heavy M
etals
Metals M
8
BT
EX
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
14
Moisture S
et
Moisture S
et
Total R
ecoverable Hydrocarbons
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
External Laboratory
No Sample ID Sample Date SamplingTime
Matrix LAB ID
1 BH1 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24439 X X X X X
2 BH2 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24440 X X X X X
3 BH3 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24441 X X X
4 BH4 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24442 X X X
5 BH1-S Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24443 X X X X
6 BH2-S Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24444 X X X X
7 BH3-S Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24445 X X X X
8 BH4-S Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24446 X X X X
9 BH5 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24447 X X X X X
Date Reported:Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 12 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Geotesta Pty Ltd (NSW) Order No.: Received: Aug 14, 2019 3:58 PMAddress: Unit 20, 1 Talavera Rd Report #: 671791 Due: Aug 21, 2019
Macquarie Park Phone: 1300852 216 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2113 Fax: Contact Name: - Mohammad Hossein Bazyar
Project Name: 137 SOUTH STREET - MARSDEN PARKProject ID: NE540
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Asim Khan
Sample Detail
Asbestos - A
S4964
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C
asrec.)
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C
asrec.)
HO
LD
pH (1:5 A
queous extract at 25°C as rec.)
pH (1:5 A
queous extract at 25°C as rec.)
Sulphate (as S
O4)
Sulphate (as S
O4)
Polycyclic A
romatic H
ydrocarbons
Heavy M
etals
Metals M
8
BT
EX
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
14
Moisture S
et
Moisture S
et
Total R
ecoverable Hydrocarbons
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
10 BH6 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24448 X X X X X X
11 BH7 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24449 X X X X X
12 BH8 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24450 X X X X X X
13 COM1 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24451 X X X X X X
14 COM3 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24452 X X X X X X
15 COM4 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24453 X X
16 COM5 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24454 X X X X X X
17 COM6 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24455 X X
18 COM7 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24456 X X X X X X
19 COM8 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24457 X X
20 D1 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24458 X X
21 COM2 Aug 14, 2019 Soil M19-Au24459 X
Page 13 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Geotesta Pty Ltd (NSW) Order No.: Received: Aug 14, 2019 3:58 PMAddress: Unit 20, 1 Talavera Rd Report #: 671791 Due: Aug 21, 2019
Macquarie Park Phone: 1300852 216 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2113 Fax: Contact Name: - Mohammad Hossein Bazyar
Project Name: 137 SOUTH STREET - MARSDEN PARKProject ID: NE540
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Asim Khan
Sample Detail
Asbestos - A
S4964
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C
asrec.)
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C
asrec.)
HO
LD
pH (1:5 A
queous extract at 25°C as rec.)
pH (1:5 A
queous extract at 25°C as rec.)
Sulphate (as S
O4)
Sulphate (as S
O4)
Polycyclic A
romatic H
ydrocarbons
Heavy M
etals
Metals M
8
BT
EX
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
14
Moisture S
et
Moisture S
et
Total R
ecoverable Hydrocarbons
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
Test Counts 5 10 10 1 10 10 10 10 4 1 8 6 6 20 20 6
Page 14 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary
General
Holding Times
Units
Terms
QC - Acceptance Criteria
QC Data General Comments
1. Laboratory QC results for Method Blanks, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, and Laboratory Control Samples follows guidelines delineated in the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site
Contamination) Measure 1999, as amended May 2013 and are included in this QC report where applicable. Additional QC data may be available on request.
2. All soil/sediment/solid results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated.
3. All biota/food results are reported on a wet weight basis on the edible portion, unless otherwise stated.
4. Actual LORs are matrix dependant. Quoted LORs may be raised where sample extracts are diluted due to interferences.
5. Results are uncorrected for matrix spikes or surrogate recoveries except for PFAS compounds.
6. SVOC analysis on waters are performed on homogenised, unfiltered samples, unless noted otherwise.
7. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis.
8. Information identified on this report with blue colour, indicates data provided by customer, that may have an impact on the results.
9. This report replaces any interim results previously issued.
Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001).
For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the SRA.
If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported.
Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control.
For VOCs containing vinyl chloride, styrene and 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether the holding time is 7 days however for all other VOCs such as BTEX or C6-10 TRH then the holding time is 14 days.
**NOTE: pH duplicates are reported as a range NOT as RPD
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram mg/L: milligrams per litre ug/L: micrograms per litre
ppm: Parts per million ppb: Parts per billion %: Percentage
org/100mL: Organisms per 100 millilitres NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity Units MPN/100mL: Most Probable Number of organisms per 100 millilitres
Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis.
LOR Limit of Reporting.
SPIKE Addition of the analyte to the sample and reported as percentage recovery.
RPD Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate pieces of analysis.
LCS Laboratory Control Sample - reported as percent recovery.
CRM Certified Reference Material - reported as percent recovery.
Method Blank In the case of solid samples these are performed on laboratory certified clean sands and in the case of water samples these are performed on de-ionised water.
Surr - Surrogate The addition of a like compound to the analyte target and reported as percentage recovery.
Duplicate A second piece of analysis from the same sample and reported in the same units as the result to show comparison.
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
APHA American Public Health Association
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
COC Chain of Custody
SRA Sample Receipt Advice
QSM US Department of Defense Quality Systems Manual Version 5.3
CP Client Parent - QC was performed on samples pertaining to this report
NCP Non-Client Parent - QC performed on samples not pertaining to this report, QC is representative of the sequence or batch that client samples were analysed within.
TEQ Toxic Equivalency Quotient
RPD Duplicates: Global RPD Duplicates Acceptance Criteria is 30% however the following acceptance guidelines are equally applicable:
Results <10 times the LOR : No Limit
Results between 10-20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-50%
Results >20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-30%
Surrogate Recoveries: Recoveries must lie between 20-130% Phenols & 50-150% PFASs
PFAS field samples that contain surrogate recoveries in excess of the QC limit designated in QSM 5.3 where no positive PFAS results have been reported have been reviewed and no data was
affected.
WA DWER (n=10): PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFOA, PFBS, PFHxS, PFOS, 6:2 FTSA, 8:2 FTSA
1. Where a result is reported as a less than (<), higher than the nominated LOR, this is due to either matrix interference, extract dilution required due to interferences or contaminant levels within
the sample, high moisture content or insufficient sample provided.
2. Duplicate data shown within this report that states the word "BATCH" is a Batch Duplicate from outside of your sample batch, but within the laboratory sample batch at a 1:10 ratio. The Parent
and Duplicate data shown is not data from your samples.
3. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting LCS data, Toxaphene & Chlordane are not added to the LCS.
4. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting Spike data, Toxaphene is not added to the Spike.
5. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - where reporting Spike & LCS data, a single spike of commercial Hydrocarbon products in the range of C12-C30 is added and it's Total Recovery is reported
in the C10-C14 cell of the Report.
6. pH and Free Chlorine analysed in the laboratory - Analysis on this test must begin within 30 minutes of sampling.Therefore laboratory analysis is unlikely to be completed within holding time.
Analysis will begin as soon as possible after sample receipt.
7. Recovery Data (Spikes & Surrogates) - where chromatographic interference does not allow the determination of Recovery the term "INT" appears against that analyte.
8. Polychlorinated Biphenyls are spiked only using Aroclor 1260 in Matrix Spikes and LCS.
9. For Matrix Spikes and LCS results a dash " -" in the report means that the specific analyte was not added to the QC sample.
10. Duplicate RPDs are calculated from raw analytical data thus it is possible to have two sets of data.
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 15 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Quality Control Results
Test Units Result 1 AcceptanceLimits
PassLimits
QualifyingCode
Method Blank
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass
Method Blank
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass
TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass
TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass
Method Blank
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) uS/cm < 5 5 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extract at 25°C as rec.) % 101 70-130 Pass
Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance
LimitsPass
LimitsQualifying
Code
Spike - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1
TRH C6-C9 M19-Au23438 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass
TRH C10-C14 S19-Au20890 NCP % 103 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1
Chlordanes - Total M19-Au15707 NCP % 100 70-130 Pass
4.4'-DDD M19-Au15707 NCP % 81 70-130 Pass
4.4'-DDE M19-Au15707 NCP % 93 70-130 Pass
a-BHC M19-Au15707 NCP % 94 70-130 Pass
Aldrin M19-Au15707 NCP % 101 70-130 Pass
b-BHC M19-Au15707 NCP % 73 70-130 Pass
Endosulfan I M19-Au15707 NCP % 90 70-130 Pass
Endosulfan II M19-Au15707 NCP % 95 70-130 Pass
Endosulfan sulphate M19-Au15707 NCP % 90 70-130 Pass
Endrin M19-Au15707 NCP % 101 70-130 Pass
Endrin ketone M19-Au15707 NCP % 119 70-130 Pass
Heptachlor M19-Au15707 NCP % 80 70-130 Pass
Hexachlorobenzene M19-Au15707 NCP % 100 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
Result 1
Sulphate (as SO4) M19-Au24538 NCP % 88 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1
4.4'-DDT S19-Au20293 NCP % 98 70-130 Pass
Methoxychlor S19-Au20293 NCP % 79 70-130 Pass
Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance
LimitsPass
LimitsQualifying
Code
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
TRH C6-C9 M19-Au24973 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass
TRH C10-C14 S19-Au20888 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass
TRH C15-C28 S19-Au20888 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass
TRH C29-C36 S19-Au20888 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 16 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Duplicate
BTEX Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Benzene M19-Au24973 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Toluene M19-Au24973 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Ethylbenzene M19-Au24973 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
m&p-Xylenes M19-Au24973 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
o-Xylene M19-Au24973 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Xylenes - Total M19-Au24973 NCP mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Naphthalene M19-Au24973 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
TRH C6-C10 M19-Au24973 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass
TRH >C10-C16 S19-Au20888 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Chlordanes - Total M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
4.4'-DDD M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
4.4'-DDE M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
4.4'-DDT M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
a-BHC M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Aldrin M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
b-BHC M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
d-BHC M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Dieldrin M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Endosulfan I M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Endosulfan II M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Endosulfan sulphate M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Endrin M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Endrin aldehyde M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Endrin ketone M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
g-BHC (Lindane) M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Heptachlor M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Heptachlor epoxide M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Hexachlorobenzene M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Methoxychlor M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass
Toxaphene M19-Au19467 NCP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Azinphos-methyl M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Bolstar M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Chlorfenvinphos M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Chlorpyrifos M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Chlorpyrifos-methyl M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Coumaphos M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass
Demeton-S M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Demeton-O M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Diazinon M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Dichlorvos M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Dimethoate M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Disulfoton M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
EPN M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Ethion M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Ethoprop M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Ethyl parathion M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Fenitrothion M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Fensulfothion M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 17 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Duplicate
Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Fenthion M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Malathion M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Merphos M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Methyl parathion M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Mevinphos M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Monocrotophos M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass
Naled M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Omethoate M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass
Phorate M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Pirimiphos-methyl M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Pyrazophos M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Ronnel M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Terbufos M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Tetrachlorvinphos M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Tokuthion M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Trichloronate M19-Au23052 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Heavy Metals Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Arsenic M19-Au28073 NCP mg/kg 12 12 1.0 30% Pass
Cadmium M19-Au28073 NCP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass
Chromium M19-Au28073 NCP mg/kg 15 15 1.0 30% Pass
Copper M19-Au28073 NCP mg/kg 23 23 1.0 30% Pass
Lead M19-Au28073 NCP mg/kg 71 71 1.0 30% Pass
Mercury M19-Au28073 NCP mg/kg 0.1 < 0.1 7.0 30% Pass
Nickel M19-Au28073 NCP mg/kg 12 12 1.0 30% Pass
Zinc M19-Au28073 NCP mg/kg 76 78 2.0 30% Pass
Duplicate
Result 1 Result 2 RPD
% Moisture M19-Au24442 CP % 15 13 9.0 30% Pass
Duplicate
Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extractat 25°C as rec.) M19-Au24443 CP uS/cm 320 330 3.0 30% Pass
Duplicate
Result 1 Result 2 RPD
pH (1:5 Aqueous extract at 25°C asrec.) M19-Au24446 CP pH Units 7.0 7.1 Pass 30% Pass
Duplicate
Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Conductivity (1:5 aqueous extractat 25°C as rec.) M19-Au24452 CP uS/cm 32 40 21 30% Pass
pH (1:5 Aqueous extract at 25°C asrec.) M19-Au24452 CP pH Units 7.0 7.1 pass 30% Pass
Duplicate
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Acenaphthene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Acenaphthylene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Anthracene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Benz(a)anthracene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Benzo(a)pyrene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Benzo(k)fluoranthene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Chrysene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 18 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Duplicate
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Fluoranthene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Fluorene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Naphthalene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Phenanthrene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Pyrene M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Sulphate (as SO4) M19-Au24454 CP mg/kg < 30 < 30 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Result 1 Result 2 RPD
% Moisture M19-Au24456 CP % 7.6 6.8 11 30% Pass
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 19 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
Comments
Sample IntegrityCustody Seals Intact (if used) N/A
Attempt to Chill was evident Yes
Sample correctly preserved Yes
Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes
Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes
Samples received within HoldingTime Yes
Some samples have been subcontracted No
Qualifier Codes/Comments
Code Description
N01F2 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "naphthalene" value from the ">C10-C16" value. The naphthalene value used in this calculation is obtained from volatiles(Purge & Trap analysis).
N02
Where we have reported both volatile (P&T GCMS) and semivolatile (GCMS) naphthalene data, results may not be identical. Provided correct sample handling protocols havebeen followed, any observed differences in results are likely to be due to procedural differences within each methodology. Results determined by both techniques have passedall QAQC acceptance criteria, and are entirely technically valid.
N04F1 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "Total BTEX" value from the "C6-C10" value. The "Total BTEX" value is obtained by summing the concentrations of BTEXanalytes. The "C6-C10" value is obtained by quantitating against a standard of mixed aromatic/aliphatic analytes.
N07Please note:- These two PAH isomers closely co-elute using the most contemporary analytical methods and both the reported concentration (and the TEQ) apply specifically tothe total of the two co-eluting PAHs
Authorised By
Asim Khan Analytical Services Manager
Emily Rosenberg Senior Analyst-Metal (VIC)
Gabriele Cordero Senior Analyst-Inorganic (NSW)
Harry Bacalis Senior Analyst-Volatile (VIC)
Joseph Edouard Senior Analyst-Organic (VIC)
Julie Kay Senior Analyst-Inorganic (VIC)
Nibha Vaidya Senior Analyst-Asbestos (NSW)
Glenn Jackson
General Manager
- Indicates Not Requested
* Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service
Measurement uncertainty of test data is available on request or please click here.Eurofins shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins be liable for consequential damages including, but not limited to, lostprofits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.
Date Reported: Aug 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing 6 Monterey Road, Dandenong South, Victoria, Australia 3175
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000
Page 20 of 20
Report Number: 671791-S
GEOTESTA Pty Ltd
Plasticity Index & Linear Shrinkage Rock & Soil Mechanics Laboratory
17 Redwood Drive
Notting Hill , Vic 3168
Geotesta Project Geotechnical Investigation Client Geotesta
L1390-A1 Project No NE540 Client ID -
L1390-1 Location Address Unit 20/1 Talavera Rd
[email protected] Macquarie Park NSW 2113
Results Notes
% History of sample:
% Method of preparation:
% Linear shrinkage:
% Length of mould:
Comments
Test methods: AS 1289, 2.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.1, 3.3.1, 3.4.1
The results of the tests included in
this document are traceable to
Australian and national standards.
Air-dried
Dry-sieved
Curling
14
36
Page 1 of 1
250 mm
Plastic limit
Plasticity index
Linear shrinkage
50
Accredited for compliance with
ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing
Atterberg Limits
Report issued by:
Date issued: 21/08/2019
Tests (LL PL PI LS) V5
Adam Wellings
12
Sample submitted by Client:
Liquid limit
Tested as received
Silty CLAY with trace of sand, reddish brown
Test Report
Sample Description
Laboratory
Report No
Sample ID
Borehole ID
GEOTESTA Pty Ltd
Plasticity Index & Linear Shrinkage Rock & Soil Mechanics Laboratory
17 Redwood Drive
Notting Hill , Vic 3168
Geotesta Project Geotechnical Investigation Client Geotesta
L1390-A3 Project No NE540 Client ID -
L1390-3 Location Address Unit 20/1 Talavera Rd
[email protected] Macquarie Park NSW 2113
Results Notes
% History of sample:
% Method of preparation:
% Linear shrinkage:
% Length of mould:
Comments
Test methods: AS 1289, 2.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.1, 3.3.1, 3.4.1
Tested as received
Silty CLAY, grey, moist
Test Report
Sample Description
Laboratory
Report No
Sample ID
Borehole ID
Atterberg Limits
Report issued by:
Date issued: 21/08/2019
Tests (LL PL PI LS) V5
Adam Wellings
12
Sample submitted by Client:
Liquid limitPlastic limit
Plasticity index
Linear shrinkage
63
Accredited for compliance with
ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing
The results of the tests included in
this document are traceable to
Australian and national standards.
Air-dried
Dry-sieved
Curling
20
43
Page 1 of 1
250 mm
GEOTESTA Pty Ltd
Plasticity Index & Linear Shrinkage Rock & Soil Mechanics Laboratory
17 Redwood Drive
Notting Hill , Vic 3168
Geotesta Project Geotechnical Investigation Client Geotesta
L1390-A2 Project No NE540 Client ID -
L1390-2 Location Address Unit 20/1 Talavera Rd
[email protected] Macquarie Park NSW 2113
Results Notes
% History of sample:
% Method of preparation:
% Linear shrinkage:
% Length of mould:
Comments
Test methods: AS 1289, 2.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.1, 3.3.1, 3.4.1
Tested as received
Silty CLAY with trace of sand, reddish brown
Test Report
Sample Description
Laboratory
Report No
Sample ID
Borehole ID
Atterberg Limits
Report issued by:
Date issued: 21/08/2019
Tests (LL PL PI LS) V5
Adam Wellings
12
Sample submitted by Client:
Liquid limitPlastic limit
Plasticity index
Linear shrinkage
45
Accredited for compliance with
ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing
The results of the tests included in
this document are traceable to
Australian and national standards.
Air-dried
Dry-sieved
Curling
16
29
Page 1 of 1
250 mm