18
GET Baltic Regional gas trading platform for the Baltic States Gintaras Buzkys Chief Business Development Officer Baltic Gas Market Forum (Tartu, Estonia) April 17 th 2018

GET Baltic - konkurentsiamet.ee€¦ · Estonia 53,799 24,266. Liquidity impact on prices on the Baltic Gas Exchange 10 ... Prezentacija Created Date: 4/19/2018 10:01:09 AM

  • Upload
    phamnhu

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

GET BalticRegional gas trading platform for the Baltic States

Gintaras Buzkys

Chief Business Development Officer

Baltic Gas Market Forum (Tartu, Estonia)

April 17th 2018

AGENDA

2

1. INTRODUCTION AND TRADING RESULTS 3

1.1. Introduction to the Baltic Gas Exchange 4

1.2. Exchange development 5

1.3. Trading results 7

1.4 Liquidity and prices 9

2. INTEGRATED TRADING (ICA) MODEL ENHANCEMENT 11

2.1. ICA Benefits 12

2.2. ICA within-day implementation schedule 17

3. CONTACTS 18

3

INTRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT

Introduction to the Baltic Gas Exchange

4

7

8

66

GET Baltic at a glance:

» Established in 2012 (first trade in 2013)

» Strong ownership – 100% owned by AB Amber Grid (Lithuanian gas TSO)

» Supervised by national NRAs and ACER

» Provide continuous trading via the electronic trading system based on Enoro’s GENERIS platform

» Physical trade in: Previous Day, Within day, Day-ahead, Nearest day-ahead (up to 150 days), Month ahead

» Key goal is to promote further competition, transparency and deliver market price reference

REMIT data reporting services

Access to all three Baltic

markets

Markets are integrated via

ICA model

Registered 73 exchange participants

Improved time-to-market

for gas products

One rulebook and single admission

process

Standardized trading and settlement

process

UMM data reporting services

Exchange development

5

Key Figures

2018 Q1 2017 2016

Exchange participants No. 73 71 58

Newly registered exchange participants No. 2 13 4

Active exchange participants No. 18 16 15

Trading volumes GWh 177 441 299

Number of trades No. 705 1.159 1.035

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2017 2016 2015

Participants of the Exchange

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0

100

200

300

400

500

2018 Q1 2017 2016

UnitsGWhTrading volumes

Traded volumes, GWh Number of transactions

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2018 Q1 2017 2016

Participants of the Exchange

Exchange participants on the Baltic Gas Exchange

6

Trading volumes and activity | Baltics

7

Monthly volumes 1)

1 the volumes of submitted orders has been calculated excluding the volumes displayed from other market areas

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

280

320

0

20 000

40 000

60 000

80 000

100 000

120 000

140 000

UnitsMWh

Monthly volumes (MWh) Number of trades

8

Trading volumes and activity | By country

Monthly volumes 1)

1) the volumes of submitted orders has been calculated excluding the volumes displayed from other market areas

0

50

100

150

200

250

0

20 000

40 000

60 000

80 000

100 000

120 000

140 000

UnitsMWh Lithuanian market area

Buy volume traded (MWh)

Sell volume traded (MWh)

Number of buy trades

Number of sell trades

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0

5 000

10 000

15 000

20 000

25 000

30 000

35 000

UnitsMWh Latvian market area

Buy volume traded (MWh)

Sell volume traded (MWh)

Number of buy trades

Number of sell trades

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0

1 000

2 000

3 000

4 000

5 000

6 000

7 000

8 000

9 000

UnitsMWh Estonian market area

Buy volume traded (MWh)

Sell volume traded (MWh)

Number of buy trades

Number of sell trades

Liquidity on the Baltic Gas Exchange

9

Volumes of submitted orders and natural gas prices 1

1 the volumes of submitted orders has been calculated excluding the volumes displayed from other market areas

16,50

17,00

17,50

18,00

18,50

19,00

19,50

20,00

0

500

1 000

1 500

2 000

2 500

3 000

3 500

4 000

4 500

5 000

Baltics Lithuania Latvia Estonia

EUR/MWhGWh

Buy orders volume (GWh) Sell orders volume (GWh)

Buy orders weighted average price (EUR/MWh) Sell orders weighted average price (EUR/MWh)

July 2017 – March 2018

Total number of submitted orders (MWh)

Buy Sell

Baltics 2,669,410 4,593,360

Lithuania 2,239,485 3,709,386

Latvia 376,126 859,708

Estonia 53,799 24,266

Liquidity impact on prices on the Baltic Gas Exchange

10

Market Makers program increases liquidity and ensures lower spreads for the Baltic market

Argus started publishing Baltic Gas Spot Index (BGSI) in a daily publications of Argus European Natural Gas

Natural Gas Prices, July 2017 – March 2018

0,00

10,00

20,00

30,00

40,00

50,00

60,00

70,00

EUR

/MW

h

BGSI GASPOOL index

11

ICA MODEL ENHANCEMENT

ICA Benefits 1)

12

• Increased liquidity in the region

• Increased competition in the region

• Short-term price convergence

• Virtual reverse capacity opportunity from EE to LV

• Convenient for traders and shippers:

o No double or triple capacity bookings necessary at IPs

o Capacity is booked automatically

o Capacity is booked only for purchased gas quantity

MARKET INTEGRATION TOOL

1) ICA – implicit capacity allocation model includes the allocation of short-term transmission capacities between member states on the natural gas exchange platform together with the volume of gas sold on the Baltic countries’ markets through the exchange.

ICA role in traded volumes

13

From 1st of July 2017, when ICA is applied:

• 40% of all Day-ahead trades were traded cross-border through ICA

• Trading in within day product was more active – 1.7 times more than day-ahead

Within day and Day-ahead traded volumes, GWh

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2017.07 2017.08 2017.09 2017.10 2017.11 2017.12 2018.01 2018.02 2018.03

Day-ahead (ICA) Day-ahead (excluding ICA) Within day first second

Gas wholesale price differences

14

Gas wholesale price differences and illustrative price zones within the EU (2015-2016), without correction for cross-border tariffs.

The results confirm the existence and the borders of the North-Western price zone, as across-the-border price differences are smaller than EUR 0.5 within the core of the region, and EUR 0.5 to 1 on the borders with France and Austria.

Source: REKK analysis based on EU Quarterly Reports on European Gas Markets

0,00

0,10

0,20

0,30

0,40

0,50

0,60

0,70

0,80

0,90

1,00

2017.07 2017.08 2017.09 2017.10 2017.11 2017.12 2018.01 2018.02 2018.03

Day-ahead Entry/exit tariff at LT-LV IP*

ICA impact on price convergence| LV - LT

15

Day-ahead prices spreads between Lithuanian and Latvian market areas, EUR/MWh

One of impacts – Entry/exit tariff reduction

*Entry/exit tariff = (LT entry + LT exit)/2+LV entry/exit

ICA impact on price convergence | LV - EE

16

Day-ahead prices spreads between Latvian and Estonian market areas, EUR/MWh

*Entry/exit tariff = (LT entry + LT exit)/2+LV entry/exit

0,00

0,05

0,10

0,15

0,20

0,25

0,30

2017.12 2018.01 2018.02 2018.03

Day-ahead Entry/exit tariff at LV-EE IP*

ICA within-day implementation schedule

17

2018

April May June July

Principal decision on ICA model enhancement

Submission of national Network Rules and Trading

Regulation to NRAs

Data Exchange solution testing by TSOs and GET

Baltic

Provision of the Within-day product to the

ICA model

Presentation of the project to NRAs and Gas Market

Participants

Public consultation on Network Rules and Trading

Regulation

New ICA model version delivery to the GET Baltic

Trading System

Approval of national Network Rules and Trading

Regulation

Signing of the Amendments to ICA

service contracts

18

Gintaras BuzkysChief Business Development OfficerMob. +370 600 88047E-mail: [email protected]