Ginsburg en Radio Fields

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Radio Fields

    An Afierword

    FAYE G I N S B U R G

    "Truly groundbreaking" is a much overused phrase, but in the case of this volume, I feel confident using it; it is the first to date to bring sustained atten-tion to the innovative workbeing done on radio as an object of anthropolog-ical inquiry. Part of the excitement of this book is its rock-solid connection to the best of current ethnographic theory and method, while also showing the rich contribution that research on radio offers to people in neighboring fields such as media, Communications, and sound studies, where scholars are less inclined to work outside their cultural comfort zones than are anthro-pologists. Despite efforts to think outside the box in these related disciplines, their historical attachments to dominant Western paradigms and practices seem to have grown even stronger with the "digital age"a term that too often conjures up a view of the whole world as wireddespite the fact that in 2011 70 percent of the world had limited or no access to the Internet.1 None-theless, it is nearly impossible to keep up with the publication of books on one or another aspect of life with so-called new media.

    Radio, however, is another matter. Its ubiquity and ease of uptake is well-known.2 Arguably, it is currently the most widely used media form on earth

    268

    RADIO FIELDS 269

    and certainly one that shaped much of the last century's experience, from Nazi Germany's use of radio as a central propaganda tool in the 1930S (Aylett 2011) to the role of radio in consolidating the affective and political sensi-bilities of the Civil Rights movement in the United States (Ward 2006), to the current politically polarized "silos" that characterize current talk-radio shows. Knowing that, it is even more remarkable that this book is the first of its kind, given that it is over a century since radio has become a common-place Communications technology and anthropology has become a recog-nized discipline. Perhaps the neglect of radio in anthropology has been in part because so much of the attention given by the field to media is associ-ated with the visualfilm, televisin, videotoo often ignoring the other elements that often constitute those media, such as sound. Meanwhile, the sonic, for many years, has been assigned to ethnomusicology. It is only in the past decade, with the publication of books such as The Audible Past (Sterne 2003) and Aural Cultures (Drobnick 2004) and a few other works noted in the introduction to this volume that "sound studies" has emerged as an ex-citing new rea of research (Samuels et al. 2010). Indeed, if the 2011 Ameri-can Anthropological Association meetings were any indicator, the number and quality of panels on this topic suggests that the anthropology of sound is finally coming into its own. 3 Clearly, it is a propitious moment for work on radio to be recognized. As is evident from the chapters in this volume, understanding radio requires attention not only to the sonicthe sound of the human voice, language, music, and even staticbut also to the ways that radio is embedded in and sometimes constitutive of "inaudible" social prac-tices such as kinship, religin, technology, personhood, and social move-ments, to ame a few key reas explored in this collection.

    In addition to the emergence of work on radio in the present represented by this book, the links between anthropology and radio over the past one hundred years offer a fascinating and underreported story that the introduc-tion provides us, laying out the historical foundations for the work in this volume. Thanks to the editors, Lucas Bessire and Daniel Fisher, as well as the other ten anthropologists whose outstanding work is showcased in this book, the lack of recognition for the significance of radio as an object of eth-nographic inquiry and theorization is over.

    A n Origin Story

    I recollect when the idea for this book was first mentioned a number of years ago in a conversation in my office at New York University with Lucas Bessire, when he was just finishing his Ph.D. The possibility of editing a collection of

  • 270
  • 272