Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OSSERVATORIO PERMANENTE SUI GIOVANI E L’ALCOL Roma, CNR, 9 Luglio 2015
Giovani e alcol:
dati dai progetti
INHES, CONVERGI e MOLI-SANI
Giovanni de Gaetano, MD, PhD Dipartimento di Epidemiologia e Prevenzione IRCCS Istituto
Neurologico Mediterraneo NEUROMED
Pozzilli (Isernia)
The Italian Nutrition & HEalth Survey (INHES) is a program specifically designed to collect
scientifically robust current information on dietary habits of Italians.
The survey, designed on the trace of the NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey), conducted in US, used telephone interviews to collect and analyse a variety of nutrition and
health parameters.
The survey examined a representative national sample of 9.319 persons selected in all Italian regions,
to provide representativeness not only at the national but also at the local level.
2169; 24%
5994; 68%
679; 8%
Tutta la coorte: bevitori 76% Quando si inizia a bere?
MAI BEVITORI
BEVITORI DOPO I 12 ANNI
BEVITORI PRIMA DEI 12ANNI
010203040506070
MAI BEVITORI BEVITORI DOPO I 12ANNI
BEVITORI PRIMA DEI12 ANNI
Età attuale in rapporto all’età di inizio del bere (p<0.0001)
0
20
40
60
80
100
MAI BEVITORI BEVITORI DOPO I 12ANNI
BEVITORI PRIMA DEI12 ANNI
Percento uomini bevitori (p<0.0001)
Confronti corretti per età, sesso e provenienza geografica
An
ni
%
300; 67%
146; 33%
Astemi Bevitori
Distribuzione di bevitori/astemi
nei giovani sotto i 19 anni
reclutati nel progetto INHES:
Astemi: 67%
Bevitori: 33%
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Astemi Bevitori
Età media (p<0.0001)
0
10
20
30
40
50
donne uomini
Percento dei bevitori by Genere
(p=0.29)
Chi sono i ragazzi sotto i 19 anni che bevono bevande alcoliche? Il percento dei bevitori nei giovani sotto 19 anni del progetto INHES è 33%
Confronti corretti per età, sesso e provenienza geografica
Anni
%
Chi sono i ragazzi sotto i 19 anni che bevono bevande alcoliche? Il percento dei bevitori nei giovani sotto 19 anni del progetto INHES è 33%
0
10
20
30
40
50
North Center South
Percento dei bevitori by regione
(p<0.0001)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Fumo No Fumo Yes
Percento dei bevitori by fumo di sigaretta
(p<0.0001)
0
10
20
30
40
50
Sport No Sport Yes
Percento dei bevitori by sport (p<0.0001)
Confronti corretti per età, sesso e provenienza geografica
%
%
%
Mobile phone short messages service (SMS) related to healthy
lifestyle for high school students:
The CONVERGI Study.
IACOVIELLO Licia1, DE LUCIA Francesca2, DI CASTELNUOVO Augusto1, BONACCIO Marialaura 1, OLIVIERI Marco3, DONATI Maria Benedetta1,
de GAETANO Giovanni1, BONANNI Americo1
1Department of Epidemiology and Prevention IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed
Pozzilli (Isernia) 2Associazione Cuore Sano. Campobasso. Italy
3Epicomed Research Srl. Campobasso. Italy
CONVERGI STUDY
N = 371 Mean age 16 ± 1 (min/max: 14 – 19) Boys 37% Randomly recruited in two high schools in Campobasso
CONVERGI STUDY
Bevitori (14-19 anni): 83% A che età ha assaggiato l’alcol per la prima volta? Never 61 17% After 12 yrs 236 65% 9-11 yrs 50 14% Before 11 yrs 24 4%
17%
65%
14% 4%
Never
After 12 yrs
9-11 yrs
Before 11 yrs
CONVERGI STUDY
Quanto alcohol consumi? (gr/day; 12 gr = 1 drink) gr/day N % 0 61 17% 6 91 26% 12 79 22% 24 63 18% mediana di consumo tra i bevitori 42 40 11% 12 gr/day (un drink al giorno) 54 21 6%
L’83% dei ragazzi intervistati consuma bevande alcoliche Il 50% dei consumatori di bevande alcoliche assume più di un drink al giorno
CONVERGI STUDY
Quando consumi le tue bevande alcoliche? (percentuali sul totale dei bevitori, n= 310) N % All’aperitivo 118 38% Dopo cena 97 31% Fuori dai pasti 206 66%
CONVERGI STUDY
Nel weekend consumi…. (percentuali sul totale dei rispondenti, n= 299, tutti bevitori) N % la stessa quantità 126 42% di più 135 45% di meno 38 13%
CONVERGI STUDY
Quali bevande alcoliche consumi? (percentuali sul totale dei bevitori, n= 310) N % Vino 152 49% Vino rosso 141 45% Vino bianco 114 37% Vino rosato 70 23% Birra 240 77% Spumante, champagne (raramente) 246 79% Vini liquorosi (vin santo,cherry, porto) 51 16% Superalcolici 126 41% Liquori leggeri 119 38% Amari 54 17% Aperitivi alcolici 163 53% Cocktail alcolici 194 63% Bevande tipo bacardi breezer 181 58%
CONVERGI STUDY
In cosa differiscono bevitori e non? Bevitori No Si P* (n=61) (N=310) Età (anni, SD) 15.3±1.1 15.5±0.9 0.091 Ragazzi (n, %) 16 (26%) 122 (39%) 0.057 Fumatori (n, %) 1 (2%) 64 (22%) 0.0005 *P corrette per età e sesso Altri parametri antropometrici, indici di stato sociale, attività fisica e abitudini alimentari non differiscono tra le due categorie
Lo studio MOLI-SANI
Lo studio MOLI-SANI
25,000 cittadini della regione Molise
Età > 35 anni
Fase di reclutamento: 2005-2010
Principali end points: eventi
cardiovascolari, tumorali e
neurodegenerativi
Prevalenza di adesione alla dieta mediterranea
negli anni 2005-2010
Bonaccio M et a. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;24:853-60
ADHESION TO MEDITERRANEAN DIET IN THE MOLI-SANI COHORT
2005-2006 2007-2010 P value
% of intake above the median
Fruits 57.0 48.7 <.0001
Vegetables 55.9 49.6 <.0001
Fish 54.5 49.3 0.0002
Legumes 67.7 42.6 <.0001
Cereals 53.9 50.7 0.02
Dairy 52.5 50.3 0.14
Meat 49.1 53.3 <.0001
Monounsaturated/saturated fats
P value adjusted for age, sex,
wealth, education, energy
intake.
49.5 48.5 0.0003
ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION IN THE MOLI-SANI COHORT
2005-2006 2007-2010 P value
Alcohol categories % <.0001
Abstainers 24.3 33.9
Light (0-12 donne; 0-24 uomini) 40.0 31.4
Moderate (12-24 donne; 24-48 uomini) 21.8 20.3
Heavy (>24 donne; > 48 uomini) 13.9 14.4
Above median (1.16 gr/day for
women);
63.0 43.4 <.0001
Above median (20.7 gr/day for men) 49.4 50.3 0.031
No abstainers included
Above median (8.0 gr/day for women); 47.3 51.7 <.0001
Above median (26.8 gr/day for men) 47.7 51.2 0.0002
AIM: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of mobile phone SMS in promoting correct behaviours, compared to more traditional ways of communication.
The widespread use of mobile phone among younger people could provide a new cost-effective tool to disseminate information on healthy lifestyle and to encourage modifications. This study evaluated the efficacy of SMS in promoting correct behaviours and improving metabolic health. Need to explore between boys and girls regarding efficacy of structured SMS texts.
• METHODS: 430 boys and girls, aged 14-17 years, from two high schools in Campobasso (Italy) , were assigned to either intervention or control according to their home school. At baseline, all students received biometric evaluations and answered a questionnaire on lifestyle and a one-week food frequency recall. Conferences and meeting with experts were organized in both schools to enhance knowledge and understanding correct lifestyles. Both groups received nine different SMSs, one every three weeks for one year. SMSs sent to the intervention group contained specific news and messages about healthy behaviour, while those sent to the control group contained scientific news. At the end of the intervention period, a follow up evaluation was carried on. The KIDMED index based on a 16-question test was used to evaluate the Mediterranean quality of the diet
RESULTS: Both groups showed an increase in all anthropometric parameters after one year. The increase in waist circumference was significantly lower in the SMS group as compared to the control one, in both girls and boys (2.58 cm (0.99 to 4.16) in controls vs (0.24 cm (-0.99 to 1.48) in SMS, p<0.001 in girls and 2.14 cm (0.35 to 3.94) vs -0.47 cm (-2.36 to 1.42) in boys, p<0.0002, after adjustment for age and baseline levels). Similar results were observed in girls, but not in boys, for hip circumference (2.77 cm (1.69 to 3.86) vs 0.24 cm (-1.32 to 1.79), p<0.06).
No significant difference was observed neither in physical activity nor in food frequency consumption.
• CONCLUSIONS: Short messages delivered to teenagers through mobile phone may exert a favourable influence on anthropometric parameters. Further research is warranted on the efficacy of this new tool on behaviour and lifestyle. Results suggest interesting hypothesis about gender communication perception. Girls appear to be more likely than boys to receive information with features of paternalism. New studies are necessary to explore gender differences in the type of communication language.