34
GIS For The Petroleum Industry Ken Hood Ulf Becker November 15, 2017

GIS For The Petroleum Industry

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

GIS For The Petroleum IndustryKen HoodUlf BeckerNovember 15, 2017

Page 2: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

• Ulf Becker• BS, Geology, University of Kansas, 1993• MS, Geology, Northern Arizona University, 1996• Kansas Geological Survey, 1996-97• ExxonMobil, 1997-present• Currently Enterprise GIS Advisor and Senior Technical Professional for GIS in ExxonMobil IT

• Ken Hood• BS, Geology, University of Missouri-Columbia, 1983• MS, Geology, University of Kansas, 1985• PhD, Geology, University of Kansas, 1989• ExxonMobil, 1988-present

• All map examples & data are hypothetical and/or vendor supplied

Page 3: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

©2017 ExxonMobil. The recipient may use this document (and its contents) for internal purposes only. The recipient may not forward, distribute, or disclose this document (and/or its contents) to third parties. The recipient may not copy this document to a Web site. We based the information on data believed to be reliable on the date compiled, but we do not represent, warrant, orotherwise guarantee, expressly or impliedly, the merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, suitability, accuracy, reliability, or completeness of this information or the products, materials, or processes described. The recipient is solely responsible for alldeterminations regarding any use of material or product and any process in its territories of interest. This presentation may include forward-looking statements. Actual future conditions (including economic conditions, energy demand, and energy supply) could differ materially due to changes in technology, the development of new supply sources, political events, demographic changes, and other factors discussed herein. We expressly disclaim liability for any loss, damage, or injury directly or indirectly suffered or incurred as a result of or related to anyone using or relying on any of the information in this document. Terms such as “we”, “our”, “ExxonMobil Exploration Company” or “ExxonMobil” are used for convenience, and may include any one or more of ExxonMobil Exploration Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation, or any affiliates they directly or indirectly steward. ExxonMobil, the ExxonMobil Logo, the Interlocking “X” Device, and all other product names used herein are trademarks of ExxonMobil unless indicated otherwise.

Portions of this document include Intellectual Property of Esri and its licensors and are used herein under license. Copyright, 2009-2017, Esri and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Page 4: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

• Regional Studies• Play Assessment• Block Exploration• Competitor Analysis

Upstream

• Pipeline Integrity• Pipeline Inspection• Design &

Construction

Midstream• Supply Chain

Analysis• Competitor Analysis• Marketing

Downstream

Provides and required for across the entire industry

Asset Tracking & InspectionEmergency Preparedness, Risk Analysis & ResponseEnvironmental Stewardship, Regulatory & Security

Page 5: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

• Design and construction

Suitability grid assigned across AOI based on required parameters

Suitability analysis is constrained & refined

Final route defined based on cost analysis

ExxonMobil demonstration data

Page 6: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

• One Call

• Inline Inspection

• Field Inspection

Screen captures courtesy of Geonamic

Page 7: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

• Risk Analysis & Emergency Response

Screen captures courtesy of Geonamic

Page 8: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

• Site Risk Analysis

• Regulatory

• Emergency Response

ExxonMobil demonstration data

Screen captures courtesyof Earthsoft

Page 9: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

• Wildlife Sightings & Management

• Asset Inspection

ExxonMobil demonstration data

Screen captures courtesyof Esri

Page 10: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

• “GIS” is an outdated phrase• “Traditional” GIS – ArcGIS, Global Mapper, GRASS, MapInfo

• Consumer grade – Apple Map, Bing Map, Google Map

• Pipeline – GeoFields, Geonamic, New Century

• Environmental – EQuIS, Oil Map

• Utilities – Smallworld

• Geoscience – Kingdom, Petra, Petrel

• GIS as a profession/degree/specialty versus GIS as a tool• Both are important for industry

• GIS specialists are required to build and maintain solutions

• Other disciplines should understand use of GIS (see above!)

• Familiarity with geodetic principles

Page 11: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

• The spatial and stratigraphic distribution of Discovered (fields) and Undiscovered (prospects) hydrocarbons is strongly influenced by the underlying geology controls

• Understanding the geologic controls on hydrocarbon potential requires linking targets to specific stratigraphic intervals

• Understanding the business value on an opportunity requires aggregating hydrocarbon pools and potential across multiple stratigraphic intervals The business value also must reflect the development status of a potential target (untested, discovered undeveloped, enhanced

recovery, etc)

• GIS provides a powerful framework in which to manage know and future potential hydrocarbon opportunities An integrated, spatial and stratigraphically enabled database for fields, prospects, and dry tests

Page 12: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

• The opportunity space for conventional hydrocarbon exploration comprises successful (fields), failed (dry tests), and untested traps (prospects)

• Traditional approach is store these different feature types in separate databases

• Integrating these feature types into a single database provides considerable benefits Accommodates complex

compartmentalization both vertically (stratigraphically) and spatially

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

Page 13: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

Producing Interval

Discovered Undeveloped

Level of Detail --Producing versus Undeveloped

Level of Detail --Wells versus Seismic

Page 14: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

GasAccumulation

OilAccumulation

Stratigraphic Variation – Status or Hydrocarbon

Type

Lateral Variation –Status or Hydrocarbon

Type

Non-contiguous segments

OverlappingHydrocarbon

Pools

Page 15: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

Non-Geologic Boundaries –Countries

Non-Geologic Boundaries –Lease Blocks

Country A Country BLease A

Lease B

Page 16: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

Basic data element is the Compartment Can vary from a single reservoir in one fault block to an entire field

Compartments characterized by: Geographic location, outline, and stratigraphic designation Exploration, assessment, and opportunity classification Hydrocarbon volume/type (field) or undiscovered potential (prospect)

Compartments aggregated using 4 level hierarchy: Compartment - Reservoir (or greater) - Field analysis

Chronostratigraphic Aggregation - Sequence - Prospect analysis Assessment Aggregation - Play Maps - Regional analysis

Closure Aggregation - Total Closure - Business analysis

Aggregation of outline, stratigraphic interval, hydrocarbon volume and type, and classifications

AGG

EGR

ATIO

N

Page 17: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

100F - UNDRL

100H - UNDRL

COUNTRY A COUNTRY B

TESTOIL

100E - PRODOIL

Example field with 8 compartments

Page 18: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

100F - UNDRL

100H - UNDRL

COUNTRY A COUNTRY B

TESTOIL

100E - PRODOIL

COUNTRY A COUNTRY B COUNTRY A COUNTRY B

COUNTRY A COUNTRY B

CLOSURE: 100PRODOILPRODOIL

PRODOIL

PRODGAS

TESTOIL

TESTOIL ASSESS: JURA

ASSESS: CRET

CHRONO: MAAS

CHRONO: TURO

CHRONO: TITH

COMPARTMENT CHRONOSTRAT

ASSESSMENT TOTAL CLOSURE

A

C D

B

“Field” “Prospect”

“Regional” “Business”

Page 19: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

Producing IntervalDiscovered Undeveloped

Prospective

Dry

Shallower(SHL)

Intermediate(INT)

Deeper(DPR)

Page 20: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

Outline and Exploration Classification by Stratigraphic Interval

COMPOSITEOUTLINE

CRET_UOIL

CRET_LDRY

JURASSICGAS

TRIASSICGAS

PERMIANUNDRILLED

OIL

DRY

GAS G

AS

PRO

SPEC

T

Page 21: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

Feature information must be retrievable by assessment interval Note variations in closure presence, outline, classification, and

hydrocarbon type

Jurassic Permian

LegendOil Field

Gas Field

Prospect

Dry Structure

Page 22: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

Integrated Database Concept

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

PLAY ANALYSISFIELD ANALYSISTR

ADIT

ION

AL A

PPRO

ACH

INTE

GRA

TED

APPR

OAC

H

FIELD (A) FIELD (C)PROSPECT (B)

EOCE

NE

PALE

OCE

NE

CRET

ACEO

US

PLAY

S

FIELDS AND PROSPECTS

GAS ACCUMULATIONOIL ACCUMULATION

PROSPECT

A

BC

FIELD (A)

CRETACEOUS

PALEOCENE

EOCENE

DRY

Legend

PROSPECT ANALYSIS

PROSPECT (B)

CRETACEOUS

PALEOCENE

EOCENE Supports different scales of analyses irrespective of the granularity of the inputs

Page 23: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

Keys to Success

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

Database should accommodate a range of complexities specific to feature data

Overlapping and non-contiguous compartments Stratigraphic and among-feature variation in level of detail Stratigraphic variation in exploration status and hydrocarbon

type Best implemented as “3-D” database

Opportunity analysis involves more than simple evaluation of undiscovered potential

Discovered undeveloped Enhanced recovery Integrated opportunity analysis

Page 24: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

• Geologic controls on hydrocarbon potential are inherently spatial and thus are well suited to GIS analysis

• Two basic hydrocarbon habitats Discreet hydrocarbon pools – need to count, risk, and size potential hydrocarbon traps; need to account for water under

hydrocarbon pools

Continuous hydrocarbon pools (e.g., shale gas, tar belts, coal bed methane) – need to account for resource density and extent, but no need to count discreet hydrocarbon pools

• ExxonMobil has implemented GIS-based tool boxes to evaluated these two hydrocarbon types

• Analysis performed by reservoir interval – a reservoir is a porous rock formation with sufficient pore space to contain producible hydrocarbons

Page 25: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

Play Resource Evaluation

After Hood and others, 2000 (Use of geographic information systems in hydrocarbon resource assessment and opportunity analysis,)

Integrating map-based geologic controls on prospect counts, risk, and size

Page 26: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

GIS-Based Workflow

After Hood and others, 2000 (Use of geographic information systems in hydrocarbon resource assessment and opportunity analysis,)

Page 27: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

Play Resource Evaluation Workflow

After Hood and Walker, 2012 (Turning Regional Geologic Interpretations into a Hydrocarbon Resource Assessment)

AsmtSoftware

Play resource evaluation starts with the geology:

How does the geology influence the number, risk, and size of potential hydrocarbon accumulations?

Page 28: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

PotentialVolumes

Business decisions:Millions $$s• Basin entry• Pursue acreage• Acquire acreage• Mature prospects• Divest

Play Potential

LeaseSeriatim

Spatially Enabled Play Analysis

Page 29: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

Opportunity Analysis

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS

Page 30: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

Opportunity Analysis – Resource and Potential Density

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

Single Pay Stacked Pays

Stacked Plays

Page 31: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

Which Block is the Best Opportunity?

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

Discoveries

Dry Test

Field

ProspectsProspects

Block A Block B

Page 32: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

Multiple-Play Analysis

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

Evaluation AreaTemplate

Aggregate Resources"Opportunities"

Evaluation Area

PlioceneMioceneEocene

MaastrichtianTuronian

AlbianTithonian

FammenianFrasnian

Results Table

Stratigraphically Defined Plays

Page 33: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

Summary

After Hood and South, 2004 (ESRI Petroleum User Group Conference, Houston)

Geologic controls on hydrocarbon distribution are inherently spatial

GIS provides a powerful platform for managing opportunities and evaluating undiscovered resource potential

GIS supports more robust business decisions

Page 34: GIS For The Petroleum Industry

The End

Thank You