Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Environmental Issues Affecting Raw Material SelectionAffecting Raw Material Selection
GMIC Workshop
Columbus, OH
O t 20 2011Oct. 20, 2011
C. Philip Ross – GICI
www.GlassIndustryConsulting.com
Raw Material Environmental Issues
• Employee Exposure – Handling Dust FumesEmployee Exposure Handling, Dust, Fumes
• Melting Furnace Exhaust Componentsg p
• Solid Waste – Particulate Recycle
Furnace Demolition
• Vendor Concerns – Cost / Availability
O ti i A li ti (F O ti )• Optimize Applications (Furnace Operations)
OSHA / Employee Exposures
“Heavy Metals” Historical Glass Applications (Introduced as an oxide a metal or other compound form)(Introduced as an oxide, a metal, or other compound form)
Element MWT Purpose
Arsenic (As) 74.9 Refining Agent
Barium (Ba) 137.9 Glass Former, Sulfate Source
Cadmium (Cd) 113 9 ColorantCadmium (Cd) 113.9 Colorant
Cobalt (Co) 58.9 Colorant
Copper (Cu) 62.9 Colorant
Chromium (Cr) 51 9 ColorantChromium (Cr) 51.9 Colorant
Mercury (Hg) 200.6 Florescent Light Cullet (Contaminant)
Manganese (Mn) 54.9 Colorant, Oxidizer
Nickel (Ni) 57 9 ColorantNickel (Ni) 57.9 Colorant
Lead (Pb) 208.0 Glass Modifier
Antimony (Sb) 120.9 Refining Agent
Selenium (Se) 79 9 Colorant DecolorizerSelenium (Se) 79.9 Colorant, Decolorizer
Zinc (Zn) 63.9 Colorant / Opacifier Component
Minor Constituents
• ColorantsChrome, Selenium, Nickel, ,
• Refining AgentsArsenic, Antimony, Sulfates, Nitrates
• Concerns:Respirable Dust Respirable VaporsFurnace Stack EmissionsSolid Waste DisposalSolid Waste Disposal
Trace levels of Volatile Heavy Metals condense in Exhaust systemand will result in concerns later with demolition / disposal
Raw Material SubstitutionsGlass Chemistry Modifications
• Arsenic to Antimony or alternate Refining Systems
• Nitrates to MnO in Cold Top Electric MeltersNitrates to MnO2 in Cold Top Electric Melters
• Selenium Metal to Selenides or Selenates
• Lead to Barium or Zirconia Composition Modifications
• Boron Free Reinforcing Fiber Glass• Boron Free Reinforcing Fiber Glass
• Reduced Boron - Insulating Fiber Glass Compositions
Glass Furnace Emissions
• Particulate (Condensate / Dust)• Particulate (Condensate / Dust)
• SOX
• NOX (Combustion, Nitrates)
• CO• CO
• HAP’s (Volatile Heavy Metals)
• Green House Gases (Combustion, Carbonates)CO2 or “Carbon Equivalent Units “ (CEU’s)
Furnace Role in Particulate EmissionsNa+ (NaOH) / HBO2 Volatilization
= Higher Particulate in Stack Emissions
Greater Volatilization from:Raw Material Dusting - Borates, Soda Ash, Salt Cake (dry batch)Hi h M lt S f T tHigher Melt Surface TemperatureHigher Melt Surface Area - Foam, Froth, BubblersHigher Atmospheric Gas Velocity (firing rates)Atmospheric Chemistry
Higher H2O partial pressureHigher CO partial pressureHigher CO partial pressure
Lower % Cullet / More Raw MaterialsNaOH Batch Wetting
Batch “Redox” controls SO4= Retention / SOX Emission Balance
Combustion for NOX Control • Melt Surface Atmosphere
Influences Glass Redox & VolatilizationN B d L V P H M l• Na, B and Low Vapor Pressure Heavy Metals
Reminder - 100 % of N in Nitrates becomes NOX
Selenium Alternatives
Ruud Beerkins - TNO
Particulate Capture Recycling
Particulate / Scrubber Recycling Captured Material IssuesRecycling Captured Material Issues
Ch i t C i t R d O id• Chemistry Consistency – Redox, Oxides
• Scrubber Reagent Considerations• Scrubber Reagent ConsiderationsEffective Stoichiometry (Temperature Range)Cost Handling Fe OCost, Handling, Fe2O3
• Dry Introduction - Particle Size, Agglomerationy , gg
• Wet Introduction – Concentration, Handling
Particulate Capture/Recycle
• Particulate Chemistry Variability
SOX S bbi / R t R t V i bilit• SOX Scrubbing / Reagent Rate Variability
• Particle Size Requires Agglomeration
National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants Batch Formulations which Incorporate any of 7 Regulated HM’s
Must Meet (NSPS) 0 2 lb Particulate per ton of glass melted)Must Meet (NSPS) 0.2 lb. Particulate per ton of glass melted)or M-29 test to confirm <0.02 lb. total HAP’s per ton of glass melted
Bulk Material Issues -Sand, Soda Ash, Limestone, Dolomite, Feldspathic
T C t• Trace ComponentsAs, Cl, SO4 in Soda AshCd in LimestonePyrite (S=) in ClaysPb, Ba, Hg in Cullet
• Tableware & Solar Glass - Low Iron
• Frac Sand Price / Availability
P ti l Si C iParticle Size Compromises
Trace Volatile HM Condensation
Recycled “Post Consumer” Cullet• Validates the Recyclability / Sustainability of Glass
• Reduces CO2 Emissions (by Process and Fuel Reductions)
• Quality ConcernsColor (Colorants, Sulfur)
lGlass Types (Chemistry Differences)CaO/MgO, Al2O3, B2O3 ,Sulfur
Inappropriate Categories (Mercury Vapor)Inappropriate Categories (Mercury Vapor)Non-Glass Contaminant SolidsOrganic (COD) Contaminant levels
• Formalize Comprehensive Quantifiable Specifications Mutual Acceptance by Vendor & Glass Manufacturer
Model Toxics in Packaging LegislationToxics in Packaging Clearinghouse (TPCH)Toxics in Packaging Clearinghouse (TPCH)
• MTPL was developed to reduce the amount ofHg MHg - Mercury, Pb - Lead, Cd - Cadmium, and Cr+6 - Hexavalent Chromium
• Toxics in Packaging Clearinghouse formed to promote the Model Toxics in Packaging Legislation
• Legislation has been successfully adopted by > nineteen states
• Any package or packaging component can not have any of the four metals intentionally introduced
• Packaging components may include coatings, inks and labels (such as ACL’s)
• The incidental presence of the metals must be reduced to 100 parts per million
Recycled Cullet RemindersMercury – Florescent Lighting Glass Cullet
As manufactured – Glass initially has no mercury,
In use, the glass surface becomes impregnated with low levels of Hg Extremely low vapor pressure results in 100 % volatilization into exhaust
Properly processing required to remove Hg before re-melting,
Historical Reminders:Lead - historically from the furnace exhaust vapors in the manufacturing of CRT glass or Lead Crystal tableware.
Lead Foil over Wine Bottle ClosuresLead Based ACL Cullet
Raw Material Substitution ExampleCalumiteCalumite
• Calcium-Alumino-Silicate
by-product from blast furnaces producing Iron
• Partial Substitution for• Partial Substitution for
Sand, RO Carbonates, Alumina Sources, and Sulfates
• Provides More Effective Refining Form of Sulfur (S=)
• Reduces Process CO2 Emissions (Limestone, Dolomite)2 ( )
• Reduces Melting Energy by Increasing Pull Potential
• Potentially Represents “Recycled Content” in glass?
Calumite “Slag” Environmental ConsiderationsConsiderations
• Amber Container Glass@ 8.3 % of Batch WeightReduced SOX/Ton by 46 %Reduced Process CO2/Ton by 17 %Reduced Process CO2/Ton by 17 %Melting Energy Savings by Electric Boost
• Architectural Float Glass@ 3.7 % of Batch Weight@ 3.7 % of Batch WeightReduced Process CO2/Ton by 9 %Reduced Natural Gas CO2/Ton by 4 %
Summary
• Employee Exposure Limits – Monitor & Control
• Look Closer for Heavy Metal Contents (RM’s & Cullet)Look Closer for Heavy Metal Contents (RM s & Cullet)
• Recognize Raw Materials Role in Furnace Emissions
• Furnace Operational Variables Influence Emissions
• Refining Mechanisms - Improvements & Optimization
• Vendors face Environmental Requirements which will Influence their products Cost & Availability
• Most of these issues are common and many could be addressed collectively by the Glass Industry