39
1 February 2017 Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conference

Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

1

February 2017

Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conference

Page 2: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

2

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION These materials do not constitute an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell securities of Ryerson Holding Corporation (“Ryerson”) and no investment decision should be made based upon the information provided herein. Ryerson strongly urges you to review its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which can be found at http://ir.ryerson.com/financial-information/sec-filings/default.aspx. This site also provides additional information about Ryerson.

SAFE HARBOR PROVISION Certain statements made in this presentation and other written or oral statements made by or on behalf of the Company constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including statements regarding our future performance, as well as management’s expectations, beliefs, intentions, plans, estimates or projections relating to the future. Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “estimates,” “will,” “should,” “plans” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. The Company cautions that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and may involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may vary materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Among the factors that significantly impact the metals distribution industry and our business are: the cyclicality of our business; the highly competitive, volatile, and fragmented market in which we operate; fluctuating metal prices; our substantial indebtedness and the covenants in instruments governing such indebtedness; the integration of acquired operations; regulatory and other operational risks associated with our operations located inside and outside of the United States; work stoppages; obligations under certain employee retirement benefit plans; the ownership of a majority of our equity securities by a single investor group; currency fluctuations; and consolidation in the metals producer industry. Forward-looking statements should, therefore, be considered in light of various factors, including those set forth above and those set forth under “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Moreover, we caution against placing undue reliance on these statements, which speak only as of the date they were made. The Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances, new information or otherwise.

NON-GAAP MEASURES Certain measures contained in these slides or the related presentation are not measures calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). They should not be considered a replacement for GAAP results. Non-GAAP financial measures appearing in these slides are identified in the footnotes. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures is included in the Appendix.

Page 3: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

3

BUSINESS OVERVIEW E D D I E L E H N E R │ P R E S I D E N T A N D C H I E F E X E C U T I V E O F F I C E R

Page 4: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

4

Ryerson Highlights

Differentiated by a branded interconnected service center network driven by speed, scale, value-add, culture, and analytics

An industry leader offering a broad range of metal products, services and solutions to a diversified group of manufacturing customers

Potential beneficiary of anticipated uptick in U.S. and Canadian fixed asset investment toward historical averages

Built for all market cycles as evidenced by continued market share growth, strong margins, and cash generation

Growth through increased value-added processing, innovative sales channels, supply chain mapping, & accretive M&A

Improved capital structure thru deleveraging the balance sheet and extending our significant debt maturities to 2021

Page 5: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

5

A Market Leading North American Service Center with Scale and Broad Strategic Footprint: The Basis for a Branded, Connected, Industrial Metals Network

• Founded in 1842; relisted on NYSE in 2014

• Approximately 100 interconnected locations in North America and China

• One of North America’s largest metals processors and distributors, with LTM 9/30/16 sales of $2.8 billion and shipments of 1.9 million tons

• Distributes 65,000 products to 40,000 active customers

% of 2015 Revenue Other 2%

Stainless 23%

Aluminum 24%

Carbon 51%

Page 6: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

6

Exposure to Diverse, Growing, and Recovering End-Markets

Commercial ground

transportation, 18%

Metal Fabrication & Machine Shops,

18%

Industrial Machinery &

Equipment, 17%

Consumer Durable, 10%

HVAC, 8%

Construction Equipment, 8%

Food Processing & Ag., 7%

Oil & Gas, 7%

All Other, 7%

Percentages are based on 2015 sales as disclosed in Ryerson’s Annual 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Page 7: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

7

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

Dec-

15

Jan-

16

Feb-

16

Mar

-16

Apr-

16

May

-16

Jun-

16

Jul-1

6

Aug-

16

Sep-

16

Oct

-16

Nov

-16

Dec-

16

Jan-

17

Feb-

17

Pric

e in

dex

to D

ec. 3

1, 2

015

CRU HRCLME NickelLME Aluminum + Midwest Premium

Macro Outlook: Improving but Volatile Industrial Metal Prices, with Potential Positive Demand Inflection

Sources: Bloomberg; prices through February 17, 2017; Federal Reserve.

Trade case rulings are rebalancing domestic vs. offshore supply

U . S . I N D U S T R I A L P R O D U C T I O N P O T E N T I A L I N F L E C T I O N I N E A R L Y 2 0 1 7

2016-2017 performance

+25%

+24%

+70%

C O M M O D I T Y P R I C E S

(0.3) (0.5)

(2.1) (2.3)

(1.4) (1.4)

(2.0)

(1.4) (1.3)

(0.6)

(0.9) (1.1) (1.1)

(0.7)

(0.3)

0.7 0.0

Page 8: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

8

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

Tons

in T

hous

ands Average Tons Jan. '93 - Oct. '08 = 4,200

Average Tons Nov. '08 - Present = 3,200

Peak Tons = 5,400

Source: Metals Service Center Institute.

Expected Significant Market Upside: The Opportunity Under-Investment Since 2009 Leaves Potential for Secular Industrial Recovery

U . S . C A R B O N a n d S T A I N L E S S M O N T H LY S H I P M E N T S

Page 9: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

9

SCALE

VALUE-ADD

SPEED CULTURE

ANALYTICS

Ryerson’s DNA – The “How” Really Matters

Page 10: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

10

METAL SHAPE PROCESSING

CARBON

STAINLESS

ALUMINUM

FABRICATION BURN/CUT

AS IS

FLAT LONG PLATE

FAB

RIC

ATIO

N

BU

RN

/CU

T AS IS

Ryerson’s “Periodic Table”: How We Deliver Value to Customers Understanding the “Elements” is Vital to Profitable Growth

Page 11: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

11

Our Strategic Priorities Step-by-Step: A Differentiated Approach

8

Ryerson virtual warehouse

7

Ryerson online store

5

Build out long products depots and inventory

profile

6

Grow stainless products market share through supply chain leverage

4

Develop and diversify vertical markets

3

Renewed emphasis

on coil / sheet

1 2

Ryerson advanced processing

Scale prospecting and call centers

Page 12: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

12

Service Center 12 Multi-Markets

Ryerson Integrated Network of Approximately 100 Locations

BENEFITS Better asset utilization:

• Shared and optimized inventory • Shared processing equipment • Shared human resources

More responsive customer service and prospecting:

• Local service center • Ryerson.com / e-commerce • After-hours call centers

Leveraging Scale and Integrated Network An Integrated and Decentralized Network of Intelligent Service Centers

Page 13: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

13

MARGIN EXPANSION OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

Growing share by leveraging scale in highly fragmented market

Multi-channel sales and distribution platform

Investment in capabilities

Bolt-on acquisitions

Expanding use of analytics

PROFITABLE GROWTH

AN INDUSTRY-LEADING PERFORMANCE

Optimize product and customer mix

Value-added processing

Value-driven pricing

Supply chain innovation, architecture, and leadership

Expense and working capital leadership

Significant operating leverage

Best practice talent management

Speed

Our culture: contributing meaningfully to our customers’ success

Page 14: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

14

3.68% 3.75% 3.79% 3.81%

4.10% 4.17% 4.17%

17.3% 19.7%

19.0%

15.2%

21.0% 22.0%

19.8%

15.9% 15.3%

16.3%

16.8% 18.9%

21.1%

20.0%

Q1 '15 Q2 '15 Q3 '15 Q4 '15 Q1 '16 Q2 '16 Q3 '16

Ryerson's U.S. MSCI Volume Market Share - All Metals Gross Margin Gross Margin Excl. LIFO

Driving Profitable Growth: Growing Market Share and Margins

Source: Metals Service Center Institute. A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP measure is included in the Appendix.

T O N N A G E M A R K E T S H A R E & G R O S S M A R G I N

Page 15: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

15

Proven Operational Efficiency and Industry Leadership: Consistent Execution of Fundamentals

82 84

82 80

78

110 109 106

109 112

2012 2013 2014 2015 Q3 2016

Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial information disclosed in competitors’ SEC filings. Competitor averages include Reliance Steel & Aluminum, Olympic Steel, Kloeckner Metals, Russel Metals, and A.M. Castle. Expense % excluding D&A and one-time items is a non-GAAP financial measure; A reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the comparable GAAP measure is included in the Appendix.

Ryerson Competitor Averages

11.5% 12.5%

11.9% 12.9%

13.8%

16.5% 17.5% 17.6%

19.1%

20.7%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 YTD

E X P E N S E P E R C E N T A G E E X C L U D I N G D & A A N D O N E - T I M E I T E M S D A Y S O F S U P P L Y

Page 16: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

16

2 0 1 5 S A L E S M I X 2 0 1 0 S A L E S M I X

• Expand value-added processing: More than 75% of metals are processed to customer specifications with growth in high margin fabrication

• Understand margins, cost to serve, asset efficiency, and industry math

Optimizing Mix to Drive Margin Expansion: Value-Add, Speed, and Attributes Emphasis

Gross margin: 13.9% 17.9% +400bps

Cut Long & Plate 3.0%

Fabrication 6.9%

As-Is Long & Plate 19.5%

Cut to Length Sheet

70.6%

Cut Long & Plate 4.3%

Fabrication 10.6%

As-Is Long & Plate 20.7%

Cut to Length Sheet

64.4%

Page 17: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

17

70k

40k

25k 65k

~930k

Unique accounts served(2011-2015)

Avg. unique accounts / yr(2011-2015)

Targeted customer opportunity Potential unique accounts / yr Estimated universe of metalbuying customers

Example: Significant Growth Potential Around Smart Use of Analytics Commercial Bandwidth is the Key

We have a large database of customer

accounts…

…potentially increasing both margin & market share

...but on average we only sell to 57% of them each year

Attractive pool of profitable prior customers

Using data analytics and advanced sales techniques, we are targeting attractive account opportunities…

Ryerson’s existing customer base External

Estimated universe of metal buying customers from Ryerson analysis of Metals Service Center Institute data.

Page 18: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

18

F I N A N C I A L O V E R V I E W E R I C H S C H N A U F E R │ C H I E F F I N A N C I A L O F F I C E R

Page 19: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

19

Expense management leadership

Continue best in class working capital management

Maximize free cash flow for investment while maintaining a strong balance sheet

Propel growth, invest in high return capital projects, and bolt-on acquisitions

Deleveraging

Ryerson Financial Priorities

Page 20: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

20

• Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO in the range of $33M to $36M up over 100% vs. Q4 ’15 • Net loss in the range of $14M to $11M in Q4 ‘16 with net LIFO expense in the range of $14M

to $17M, compared to a net loss of $21M in Q4 ’15 with net LIFO expense of $11M

Quarterly Financial Highlights: Managed Well through a Downturn and Positioned for Growth

A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP measure is included in the Appendix.

$29.2 $29.7

$14.2

$37.2

$56.0

$48.8

$33 - $36

Q2' 15 Q3' 15 Q4 '15 Q1 '16 Q2 '16 Q3 '16 Q4 '16 (F)

$15.8

$6.7

($20.5)

$13.5

$5.6 $8.2

($14 - $11)

Q2 '15 Q3 '15 Q4 '15 Q1 '16 Q2 '16 Q3 '16 Q4 '16 (F)

N E T I N C O M E ( L O S S ) A T T R I B U T A B L E T O R Y E R S O N H O L D I N G ( $ M )

A D J . E B I T D A , E X C L . L I F O ( $ M )

Page 21: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

21

Quarterly Financial Highlights: Managed Well through a Downturn and Positioned for Growth

A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP measure is included in the Appendix.

488 492

441

478

505

480

Q2 '15 Q3 '15 Q4 '15 Q1 '16 Q2 '16 Q3 '16

T O N S S H I P P E D ( 0 0 0 ’ S ) $1,722

$1,606 $1,517

$1,470 $1,465 $1,531

Q2' 15 Q3' 15 Q4 '15 Q1 '16 Q2 '16 Q3 '16

A V E R A G E S E L L I N G P R I C E P E R T O N

19.7% 19.0%

15.2%

21.0% 22.0% 19.8%

Q2 '15 Q3 '15 Q4 '15 Q1 '16 Q2 '16 Q3 '16

G R O S S M A R G I N %

15.3% 16.3% 16.8% 18.9%

21.1% 20.0%

Q2' 15 Q3' 15 Q4 '15 Q1 '16 Q2 '16 Q3 '16

G R O S S M A R G I N , E X C L . L I F O %

Page 22: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

22

$1,259

$1,024

$978

Dec. 31, 2014 Dec. 31, 2015 Sep. 30, 2016

Material Deleveraging Increases Value for All Investors

T O T A L D E B T ( $ M )

Total debt reduced by $281M

• Issued $650M of 11% Senior Secured Notes due 2022 in May 2016

• Issued common stock in July 2016 with net proceeds of $71.5M used to reduce our debt balance

• Amended our credit facility in November 2016, thereby extending the maturity date to November 16, 2021

Page 23: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

23

Ample Liquidity to Fund Operations and Investments

$162.9

185

295

23

26

65

43 $273

$364

Dec. 31, 2015 Sep. 30, 2016

North American Availability Foreign Availability Cash & Equivalents

L I Q U I D I T Y ( $ M )

Page 24: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

24

Investing in the Business – Smart Decisions Well Executed

• More than $100 million in growth capital invested since 2010, expanding value-added capabilities

• Enhanced intelligent systems for connecting: people, supply chains, inventory, fixed assets, and logistics

• Six bolt-on acquisitions since 2010 • Accretive to gross margin and

adjusted EBITDA • Focus on value-added processing • Broaden transactional customer portfolio • Strategically expand network to better

service customers

Page 25: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

R Y E R S O N I N V E S T O R P R E S E N T A T I O N

C O N C L U S I O N E D D I E L E H N E R │ P R E S I D E N T A N D C H I E F E X E C U T I V E O F F I C E R

Page 26: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

26

RYERSON Leveraging Scale and

Integrated Network

“ONE RYERSON” • Single franchise / one brand • Great customer experiences • Decentralized AND connected

Ryerson’s Differentiated Model: Connectivity, Speed, Scale, Value-Add, Culture, and Analytics Well Executed Creates Value for Investors

CONNECTIVITY • Technical knowledge • Processing & fabrication • Logistics • Inventory

MULTI-CHANNEL SALES • Local sales and service • Customer service

prospecting centers • Ryerson.com / e-commerce

GEOGRAPHIC SCALE • United States, Canada, Mexico,

and China • Local, regional, national, inter-

continental

Page 27: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

27

SAY YES, FIGURE IT OUT

Our Commitment Our Culture

Page 28: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

28

A P P E N D I X

Page 29: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

29

Metal Service Center Supply Chain

CUSTOMERS • Purchase smaller quantities • Require a variety of products

and services • Can leverage Ryerson to reduce

processing and inventory investment needs

SUPPLIERS • Manufacture metals • Produce & ship large volumes • Have long lead times with high

variance delivery times

RYERSON SERVICE CENTERS • Purchase in scale; ship

smaller quantities • Distribute 65,000+ aluminum,

carbon and stainless products • Process 75% of products sold • Deliver same/next day • Provide product and

end-market expertise

Page 30: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

30

Experienced Management Team Executive Title Years at

PositionYears at Ryerson

Years in Industry

Eddie Lehner* President & Chief Executive Officer 2 5 27

Erich Schnaufer** Chief Financial Officer 2 11 11

Mark SilverExecutive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary 4 4 4

Kevin Richardson President - South / East Region 9 32 32

Mike Burbach President - North / West Region 9 33 33

Leong FangExecutive Vice President - Operations and Chief Executive Officer - Asia 4 4 33

*Eddie Lehner previously served as Ryerson's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.**Erich Schnaufer previously served as Ryerson's Controller and Chief Accounting Officer.

Page 31: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

31

Strong U.S. Dollar Contributes to Highest Trade Deficit Since 2012

90.3

100.4

88.0

90.0

92.0

94.0

96.0

98.0

100.0

102.0

104.0

106.0

Jan-

15Fe

b-15

Mar

-15

Apr-1

5M

ay-1

5Ju

n-15

Jul-1

5Au

g-15

Sep-

15O

ct-1

5N

ov-1

5D

ec-1

5Ja

n-16

Feb-

16M

ar-1

6Ap

r-16

May

-16

Jun-

16Ju

l-16

Aug-

16Se

p-16

Oct

-16

Nov

-16

Dec

-16

Jan-

17Fe

b-17

Appreciation of U.S. Dollar

DXY Index

-384

-495-549 -537

-462 -490 -500 -502

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

US Balance of Trade

Source: Bloomberg Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Page 32: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

32

The U.S. Trails Other OECD Member Countries in Investment

Source: World Bank

23.6

17.5

20.3

23.6

19.5

20.9

24.0

31.229.1

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

2000 2005 2010 2015

Gro

ss c

apita

l for

mat

ion

(% o

f GD

P)

United States OECD members BRIC

Page 33: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

33

Key Long: aluminum and stainless, carbon bar, carbon pipe and tube: DOM/other welded/seamless mechanical. All Other Long: carbon structurals, carbon pipe and tube: pressure/standard/structural.

Industry Math: 2016 MSCI Shipped Tonnage Mix

Industry Tons MixTotal Shapes 100%Flat 69%

Carbon Flat Rolled 64%Stainless Sheet & Coil 3%Aluminum Sheet & Coil 2%

Long 21%Key Long 11%All Other Long 10%

Plate 11%Carbon Plate 9%Stainless Plate 1%Aluminum Plate 1%

Page 34: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

34

EBITDA represents net income before interest and other expense on debt, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA gives further effect to, among other things, impairment charges on assets, reorganization expenses and foreign currency transaction gains and losses. We believe that the presentation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO expense (income), net, provides useful information to investors regarding our operational performance because they enhance an investor’s overall understanding of our core financial performance and provide a basis of comparison of results between current, past and future periods. We also disclose the metric Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO expense (income), net, to provide a means of comparison amongst our competitors who may not use the same basis of accounting for inventories. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO expense (income), net, are three of the primary metrics management uses for planning and forecasting in future periods, including trending and analyzing the core operating performance of our business without the effect of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, expenses, revenues and gains (losses) that are unrelated to the day to day performance of our business. We also establish compensation programs for our executive management and regional employees that are based upon the achievement of pre-established EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO expense (income), net, targets. We also use EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO expense (income), net, to benchmark our operating performance to that of our competitors. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO expense (income), net do not represent, and should not be used as a substitute for, net income or cash flows from operations as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and neither EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO expense (income), net, is necessarily an indication of whether cash flow will be sufficient to fund our cash requirements. This release also presents gross margin, excluding LIFO expense (income), net, which is calculated as gross profit plus LIFO expense (or minus LIFO income), net, divided by net sales. We have excluded LIFO expense (income), net from the gross margin and Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net sales metrics in order to provide a means of comparison amongst our competitors who may not use the same basis of accounting for inventories as we do. Our definitions of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO expense (income), net, gross margin, excluding LIFO expense (income), net, and Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO expense (income), net, as a percentage of sales may differ from that of other companies. Net income and Earnings per share excluding restructuring and other charges, impairment charges on assets and (gain) loss on retirement of debt are presented to provide a means of comparison with periods that do not include restructuring and other charges, impairment charges on assets and gains or losses on retirement of debt.

Non-GAAP Reconciliation

Page 35: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

35

Non-GAAP Reconciliation of Recent Developments: Q4 2016 Anticipated Net Loss to Adjusted EBITDA, Excluding LIFO Expense

Q4 2016 Low HighNet loss attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation (14)$ (11)$ Interest and other expense on debt 22 22 Benefit from income taxes (9) (6) Depreciation and amortization expense 10 10 EBITDA 9$ 15$ Adjustments 7 7 Adjusted EBITDA 16$ 22$ LIFO expense, net 17 14 Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO expense, net 33$ 36$

Range of Estimates(unaudited)(in millions)

Page 36: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

36

Non-GAAP Reconciliation: Quarterly ($M) Q2 '15 Q3 '15 Q4 '15 Q1 '16 Q2 '16 Q3 '16Net Sales 840.4 790.0 668.8 702.6 739.8 735.1 Gross Profit 165.8 150.3 101.6 147.6 163.0 145.4 Gross Margin 19.7% 19.0% 15.2% 21.0% 22.0% 19.8%LIFO Expense (Income) (37.0) (21.3) 10.8 (14.8) (7.0) 1.4 Gross Profit, excluding LIFO 128.8 129.0 112.4 132.8 156.0 146.8 Gross Margin, excluding LIFO 15.3% 16.3% 16.8% 18.9% 21.1% 20.0%Warehousing, delivery, selling, general and administrative expenses 114.2 112.8 107.4 109.3 113.1 109.1 Depreciation and amortization expense 11.1 11.7 9.8 10.9 10.7 10.2 Warehousing, delivery, selling, general and administrative expenses

excluding Depreciation and Amortization 103.1 101.1 97.6 98.4 102.4 98.9 Expense excluding Depreciation and Amortization, impairment, and restructuring

% of Net Sales 12.3% 12.8% 14.6% 14.0% 13.8% 13.5%Net Income (loss) attributable to Ryerson Holding 15.8 6.7 (20.5) 13.5 5.6 8.2 Interest and other expense on debt 23.8 25.4 21.8 22.0 21.9 23.6 Provision (benefit) for income taxes 10.2 6.1 (12.4) 8.1 4.3 1.6 Depreciation and amortization expense 11.1 11.7 9.8 10.9 10.7 10.2 EBITDA 60.9 49.9 (1.3) 54.5 42.5 43.6 Reorganization 2.2 1.3 4.7 1.3 1.8 3.0 Gain on sale of assets - - (1.9) - - - Gain on settlements - - (4.4) - - - (Gain) loss on retirement of debt 0.2 (1.0) - (8.2) 15.1 0.3 Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses 0.5 (0.1) (0.3) 2.9 0.3 - Impairment charges on fixed assets 1.4 0.5 5.8 - 2.8 - Purchase consideration and other transaction costs 1.1 0.5 0.6 1.5 0.4 0.1 Other adjustments (0.1) (0.1) 0.2 - 0.1 0.4 Adjusted EBITDA 66.2 51.0 3.4 52.0 63.0 47.4 LIFO Expense (Income) (37.0) (21.3) 10.8 (14.8) (7.0) 1.4 Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO 29.2 29.7 14.2 37.2 56.0 48.8 Adjusted EBITDA Margin, excluding LIFO 3.5% 3.8% 2.1% 5.3% 7.6% 6.6%

Page 37: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

37

Non-GAAP Reconciliation: Reconciliation of Net Income and Earnings per Share Excluding Impairment and (Gain) Loss on Retirement of Debt

Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except per Share Data Q3 '16 Q3 '15 2016 2015Net Income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation 8.2$ 6.7$ 27.3$ 20.0$

Restructuring and other charges 2.5 - 2.5 - Impairment charges on assets - 0.5 2.8 14.2(Gain) loss on retirement of debt 0.3 (1.0) 7.2 (0.3) Provision (benefit) for income taxes (1.0) 0.3 (4.7) (5.0)Net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation, excluding

restructuring and other charges, impairment charges on assets and gain (loss) on retirement of debt 10.0$ 6.5$ 35.1$ 28.9$

Earnings per share, excluding restructuring and other charges, impairment charges on assets and (gain) loss on retirement of debt

Basic 0.28$ 0.20$ 1.05$ 0.90$ Diluted 0.28$ 0.20$ 1.05$ 0.90$

Shares outstanding - basic 35.8 32.1 33.3 32.0

Shares outstanding - diluted 36.0 32.1 33.4 32.1

Third QuarterNine Months Ended Sep 30

Net income and Earnings per share excluding restructuring and other charges, impairment charges on assets and (gain) loss on retirement of debt are presented to provide a means of comparison with periods that do not include restructuring and other charges, impairment charges on assets and gains or losses on retirement of debt.

Page 38: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

38

Non-GAAP Reconciliation: Annual ($M) 2012 2013 2014 2015 Q3 '16 YTD

Net Sales 4,024.7 3,460.3 3,622.2 3,167.2 2,177.5 Gross Profit 709.6 616.6 593.8 567.7 456.0 Gross Margin 17.6% 17.8% 16.4% 17.9% 20.9%LIFO Expense (Income), net (63.1) (33.0) 42.3 (59.5) (20.4) Gross Profit, excluding LIFO 646.5 583.6 636.1 508.2 435.6 Gross Margin, excluding LIFO 16.1% 16.9% 17.6% 16.0% 20.0%Warehousing, delivery, selling, general and administrative expenses 508.9 480.1 509.2 450.8 331.5 IPO-related expenses - - 32.7 - - Depreciation and amortization expense 47.0 46.6 45.6 43.7 31.8 Warehousing, delivery, selling, general and administrative expenses

excluding Depreciation and Amortization and IPO-related expenses 461.9 433.5 430.9 407.1 299.7 Expense excluding Depreciation and Amortization, impairment, restructuring, and

IPO-related expenses % of Net Sales 11.5% 12.5% 11.9% 12.9% 13.8%Net Income (loss) attributable to Ryerson Holding 47.1 127.3 (25.7) (0.5) 27.3 Interest and other expense on debt 126.5 110.5 107.4 96.3 67.5 Provision (benefit) for income taxes (5.5) (112.3) (0.7) 3.7 14.0 Depreciation and amortization expense 47.0 46.6 45.6 43.7 31.8 EBITDA 215.1 172.1 126.6 143.2 140.6 Reorganization 5.8 11.5 5.4 9.7 6.1 Gain on sale of assets - - (1.8) (1.9) - Gain on settlements - - (0.4) (4.4) - Advisory service fee 5.0 5.0 28.3 - - (Gain) loss on retirement of debt 32.8 - 11.2 (0.3) 7.2 Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses 1.5 (3.7) (5.3) (1.5) 3.2 Impairment charges on assets 1.0 10.0 - 20.0 2.8 Purchase consideration and other transaction costs 4.3 3.5 11.2 3.7 2.0 Other adjustments (0.8) 4.2 - - 0.5 Adjusted EBITDA 264.7 202.6 175.2 168.5 162.4 LIFO Expense (Income) (63.1) (33.0) 42.3 (59.5) (20.4) Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO 201.6 169.6 217.5 109.0 142.0 Adjusted EBITDA Margin, excluding LIFO 5.0% 4.9% 6.0% 3.4% 6.5%

Page 39: Global High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conferences1.q4cdn.com/424023498/files/doc_presentations/2017/JPM...Q3 2016 Competitor averages are based on Ryerson’s analysis of financial

39