Upload
becka
View
41
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
20th SWIM 24. June 2008. Global land-ocean linkage: direct inputs of water and associated nutrients to coastal zones via submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) . Hans Dürr (1) , R. van Beek (1) , C.P. Slomp (2) , H. Middelkoop (1) , M. Bierkens (1) [email protected] . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
(1) Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
(2) Department of Earth Sciences – Geochemistry, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Global land-ocean linkage: direct inputs of water and associated nutrients
to coastal zones via submarine groundwater discharge (SGD)
Hans Dürr(1), R. van Beek(1), C.P. Slomp(2), H. Middelkoop(1), M. Bierkens(1)
20th SWIM20th SWIM24. June 200824. June 2008
Effects of nutrient enrichment (eutrophication) of coastal waters
red tide(harmful algal bloom)
foam
more algalblooms
Rationale• Higher nutrient inputs (N, P) from rivers to coastal waters +
estuaries, inverse trend (decrease) due to damming for Si
• Global nutrient fluxes at the land-ocean interface: Terrestrial controls, impact on coastal waters and response to global change. Spatially explicit, multiple nutrient forms (dissolved / particulate, inorganic / organic)
• Box modelling (Slomp & van Cappellen 2004) has shown potential impact on coastal zone of nutrient SGD at global scale
• Typically: Groundwater N and P flux = total SGD flux x nutrient concentration, but decisive for net balance: fresh GW flux x nutrient concentration ( local scale effects of subterranean estuary)
• Submarine Groundwater Discharge (SGD) of nutrients: spatially explicit not yet estimated at global scale, comparison to river inputs (water discharge globally ~5-10% of river discharge)?
Proximal coastal ocean
burial
recycling
river input
groundwaterinput
Phytoplankton (mostly N-limited)
export to continentalshelf
N:P ~ 14:1
N:P mostly>>> 16
eolianinput N
denitrification
Redfield N:P = 16:1
• Fresh SGD: mostly N, less P (elevated velocity seeps in shallow, oxic systems: P removal, conservative behaviour of NO3), could drive systems to P-lim.• Only in cases when both GW and sediment are anoxic and upon saltwater intrusion: N/P ratio of SGD < Redfield• Deep GW supply mostly minor & not contaminated
Snow cover
QBf
Canopy
Store 2
Store 1
Store 3
PRECEpot
Eact
QDR
QSfP
P
T
River ice
TwTA
RS
Snow/Rain
QChannel
PRECEpot
QChannel
TA
RS
Snow/Rain
LH(Epot)
Q
Courtesy R. van Beek
Model structure
0,5° grid
Each cell: - Conceptual model partly
based on the HBV model
- Climate variables are from the ERA40 data set
- Transfer / Routing of runoff to the drainage network
For baseflow here: - Not fully calibrated yet- Energy balance + lakes will be
considered in later stages- Monthly values annual means
Concept of groundwater flow• Kraaijenhof-Van de Leur (1958)
– Boussinesq – Dupuit assumptions to calculate the reservoir coefficient kr
where: k is the hydraulic conductivity (L·t-1 e.g., m/day), D is the aquifer thickness (L, 50m assumed), f is the drainable porosity (obtained from lithology + some Holdridge climate data) (dimensionless, 0-1) and B is the aquifer width (L).
Using various global data sets
2
2
4 fBkDkr
Courtesy R. van Beek
Residence time of Groundwater
Courtesy R. van Beek
Long residence times: - Highly weathered soils - Tropics
Result:
Model performance (no full calibration yet): - Good in most temperate and tropical regions- Weaker in Arctic + semi-arid regions: no evaporation from surface waters yet, snowmelt driven by mean monthly temp.
Next step – full calibration on low flow conditions
Local groundwater discharge
Courtesy R. van Beek
High in: Some tropical regions, esp. SE-Asia / Indonesia; W Canada, Florida; Ex.: Patos Lagoon
Low: Arctic, but % contribution to total flow is high
Next steps, including nutrients
• Coastal water divide where baseflow = SGD??• Human GW extraction? • Salt-water intrusion sites (low-lying areas)?!
• Range of GW nutrient concentrations for DIN ~NO3• Test nutrient attenuation scenarios, e.g., based on half-life
approaches • Coupling to information from landuse and population
Coastal ribbon definition for SGD: distance to water divide at coast
Problem :
what is a stream ???
every catchment basin that has a cumulated upstream area > xx km2
testing possible
0,5° grid cell
subgrid variability
last gauging station
Courtesy Rens van Beek
Water extraction: - country based GW abstraction from IGRAC / TNO - linked to total water use and population numbers from Vörösmarty et al.
Groundwaterabstraction
USGS Summary data
Range ofGW nutrient
concentrationsin different
landusesettings
(NO3)
Agricultural Urban Misc. Undevel. land
Data from IGRAC / TNO
High Groundwater Nitrate sites
Potential hotspots with potentially elevated N input
Caution: - Very local phenomena not detected - Total Groundwater flow in coastal cells, not SGD - GW abstraction not considered - Saltwater intrusion not considered- Effect of residence time in GW on nutrient concentrations
Some study sites for SGD including nutrients
DIN-NEWS empirical model: Dumont et al. 2005
Rivers
Groundwater
Similarities in regions, local differences
Conclusions: first steps towards• Spatially explicit estimates of SGD at global scale, using
baseflow estimates from new global hydrological model• Potential hot spots of freshwater nutrient SGD
– SE Asia (esp. Indonesia) + Central America: hot spots for both river and GW fluxes (high baseflow, high runoff and high levels of human activity) – exact locations and time scales may be different
• Field studies needed in high ‘risk’ areas, e.g. (sub-)tropical areas of Africa, S America and SE Asia – some studies now underway
• Examples have been shown to include amendments such as GW abstraction, GW quality data, landuse + population data
As source of ‘new’ nutrients, especially N (less
P), freshwater SGD is potentially important for coastal nutrient cycling
(N-limitation of most coastal waters) at global scale (strong response to
human impact)
Salt-water intrusion: CaHCO3 freshwater is replaced by NaCl and SO4
2- rich sea water
Ca2+Ca2+
Na+
Ca2+
Ca2+ Na+Na+
-Na2+ replaces Ca2+, NH4+
-Cl- or SO42- replaces PO4
- Increased degradation of organic matter (Nyvang, 2003)- Increased sulfate reduction & reduction of Fe-oxides by S2- NH4 and PO4 release to the groundwater
Na+