Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The People questionnaire consists of 27 questions that assess the progress of an organization’s efforts in ensuring that its people, whether top management, GAD Focal Point System (GFPS) members or employees are gender-responsive and supportive of the organization’s gender mainstreaming efforts.
³ At the Foundation Formation level, the organization designates key people to be part of its GFPS and ensures that the appropriate capacity development sessions on GAD are provided to its top management, GFPS and staff members;
³ At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, the organization moves from the conduct of GAD orientation sessions towards ensuring that its program implementers are trained to do gender analysis, and clients are given opportunities to articulate their gender issues as per direction of its top management;
³ During the GAD Application level, top management GFPS members and program implementers are consciously integrating GAD in the organization’s regular operations.
³ At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the organization’s GFPS members are already tapped as GAD resource person within the organization and are able to develop GAD-related tools, customized to the mandate of the organization; and
³ At the Replication and Innovation level, the people of the organization are already recognized and tapped as GAD experts by other organizations, while its top management is able to raise GAD concerns during high level meetings/discussions.
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE-
PEOPLE
A Toolkit on the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework© Copyright 2016 - Philippine Commission on Women 1145 J.P. Laurel St., San Miguel Manila 1005 Philippines Telephone: +632.7365249 or +632.7367712Fax Number: +632.7364449
2 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
GUIDE FOR ANSWERING THE GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRES
1. Each item is marked with specific scores representing (1) YES; (2) PARTLY YES; and (3) NO. Indicate a score in the appropriate column to signify the degree to which your organization has complied with the GAD element required.
2. Under the MOV/Remarks column, indicate/attach the means of verification required or provide an explanation in support of your response. Failure to provide the appropriate MOVs could disregard/invalidate the “partly yes” or “fully yes” scores of the organization.
3. Transfer all the scores per questionnaire to the GMEF Score Sheet.
GMEF SCORESHEET
Name of the Organization Assessed: ________________________________ Date Administered: _______________________________________________
Inclusive Period of Assessment: ____________________________________
Key Areas ScorePolicy1. Issuance of initial policies on GAD2. Issuance of policies to mainstream GAD in the organization3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Policies4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies5. Model GAD Policy
Sub-Total:Level for Policy:
People1. On Establishing GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates2. On GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers5. GAD Experts
Sub-Total:
3GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
4. To get the total score per entry point, add the sub-total scores per questionnaire and refer to the following legend of scores to determine the organization’s level of GAD mainstreaming efforts:
Level Per Entry
Point
RANGES LEVEL DESCRIPTION0-7.99 points 1: Foundation Formation8-14.99 points 2: Installation of Strategic
Mechanisms15-19.99 points 3: GAD Application20-23.99 points 4: Commitment Enhancement and
Institutionalization24-25 points 5: Replication and Innovation
5. To get the overall level of the GAD mainstreaming efforts of the organization, add all the scores per entry point and refer to the following legend of scores to interpret the ratings:
Over-all Level
RANGES LEVEL DESCRIPTION0-30.99 points 1: Foundation Formation31-60.99 points 2: Installation of Strategic
Mechanisms61-80.99 points 3: GAD Application81-95.99 points 4: Commitment Enhancement and
Institutionalization96-100 points 5: Replication and Innovation
6. Organizations should take note of questions/descriptors with “NO” and “PARTLY YES” responses and design programs or undertake activities to improve their score.
7. The organization may re-administer the GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaires after a specified period of time (e.g. every 3 years) to keep track of its GAD mainstreaming efforts.
4 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
PEO
PLE
OR
GA
NIZ
ATIO
NA
L A
SSES
SMEN
T Q
UES
TIO
NN
AIR
E
DES
CR
IPTO
RS
SCO
RE
Scor
e pe
r ite
mM
eans
of V
erifi
catio
n/R
emar
ksN
OPA
RTL
YYE
S1.
On
the
Esta
blis
hmen
t of G
FPS
& G
AD
Cha
mpi
ons/
Adv
ocat
es (
max
sco
re: 5
; for
eac
h ite
m o
r que
stio
n, .0
83)
1.1
Has
the
orga
niza
tion
desi
gnat
ed
peop
le in
stra
tegi
c po
sitio
ns a
s m
embe
rs
of it
s G
AD
Foc
al P
oint
S
yste
m (G
FPS
)?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
are
0,
0.41
, and
0.8
3)
The
orga
niza
tion
has
yet t
o id
entif
y ke
y pe
ople
to b
e m
embe
rs o
f its
G
FPS
Som
e m
embe
rs o
f th
e G
FPS
occ
upy
stra
tegi
c po
sitio
ns in
th
e or
gani
zatio
n
Maj
ority
of t
he
mem
bers
of t
he
GFP
S o
ccup
y st
rate
gic
posi
tions
in
the
orga
niza
tion
If ye
s, p
rovi
de d
etai
ls o
n th
e po
licy
form
aliz
ing
the
crea
tion/
reco
nstit
utio
n of
the
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
Foc
al P
oint
Sys
tem
(GFP
S) a
nd a
ttach
a
copy
for v
alid
atio
n.
If no
, exp
lain
why
the
orga
niza
tion
has
not
desi
gnat
ed p
eopl
e in
stra
tegi
c po
sitio
ns a
s m
embe
rs o
f its
GA
D F
ocal
Poi
nt S
yste
m
(GFP
S)?
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
*Maj
ority
is d
efine
d at
leas
t 50%
+ 1
of a
ll G
FPS
mem
bers
as
per
SO
, AO
, DA
O o
r pol
icy
crea
ting/
reco
nstit
utin
g th
e G
AD
Foc
al P
oint
Sys
tem
of t
he o
rgan
izat
ion
1.2
Hav
e th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D
Foca
l Poi
nt S
yste
m
(GFP
S) m
embe
rs
atte
nded
app
ropr
iate
an
d re
leva
nt tr
aini
ng o
n G
AD
? (p
ossi
ble
scor
es
are
0, 0
.41,
and
0.8
3)
GFP
S m
embe
rs
have
not
atte
nded
an
y of
the
basi
c G
AD
trai
ning
GFP
S m
embe
rs
atte
nded
1-2
bas
ic
GA
D tr
aini
ng
GFP
S m
embe
rs
atte
nded
all
thre
e ba
sic
GA
D tr
aini
ng
List
dow
n ba
sic
GA
D tr
aini
ng a
ttend
ed b
y G
AD
Fo
cal P
oint
Sys
tem
mem
bers
(e.g
. Gen
der
Sen
sitiv
ity T
rain
ing
(GS
T), G
ende
r Ana
lysi
s (G
A) a
nd G
A To
ols
and
GA
D P
lann
ing
and
Bud
getin
g).
Titl
e of
G
AD
Tr
aini
ng
Num
ber o
f P
artic
ipan
tsTr
aine
r/In
stitu
tiona
l P
rovi
der
Dat
e
5GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
1.3
Has
the
orga
niza
tion’
s to
p m
anag
emen
t atte
nded
B
asic
GA
D O
rient
atio
n or
Gen
der S
ensi
tivity
Tr
aini
ng (G
ST)
? (p
ossi
ble
scor
es a
re 0
, 0.
41, a
nd 0
.83)
Top
man
agem
ent
has
not y
et
atte
nded
Bas
ic G
AD
O
rient
atio
n or
GS
T
Onl
y se
lect
ed
mem
bers
of t
he
top
man
agem
ent
atte
nded
Bas
ic G
AD
O
rient
atio
n or
GS
T
All
top
man
agem
ent
offic
ials
hav
e at
tend
ed B
asic
GA
D
Orie
ntat
ion
or G
ST
List
dow
n to
p m
anag
emen
t offi
cial
/s w
ho
atte
nded
Bas
ic G
AD
Orie
ntat
ion/
Gen
der
Sen
sitiv
ity T
rain
ing
(GS
T)
Nam
e of
Top
M
anag
emen
t O
ffici
al
Bas
ic G
AD
O
rient
atio
n/
GS
T A
ttend
ed
Inst
itutio
nal/
Trai
ning
P
rovi
der
Dat
e
1.4
Hav
e th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
staf
f m
embe
rs b
een
orie
nted
on
GA
D?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
are
0, 0
.41,
and
0.
83)
Less
than
50%
of
the
orga
niza
tion’
s st
aff m
embe
rs h
ave
atte
nded
Bas
ic G
AD
O
rient
atio
n or
GS
T
50-9
9% o
f the
or
gani
zatio
n’s
staf
f m
embe
rs h
ave
atte
nded
Bas
ic G
AD
O
rient
atio
n or
GS
T
100%
of t
he
orga
niza
tion’
s st
aff
mem
bers
hav
e at
tend
ed B
asic
GA
D
Orie
ntat
ion
or G
ST
Atta
ch a
ttend
ance
she
ets
of a
ll B
asic
GA
D
Orie
ntat
ions
or G
ende
r Sen
sitiv
ity T
rain
ing
(GS
T)
cond
ucte
d/at
tend
ed b
y th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
staf
f m
embe
rs.
1.5
Are
the
orga
niza
tion’
s to
p m
anag
emen
t and
GA
D
Foca
l Poi
nt S
yste
m
(GFP
S) m
embe
rs
awar
e an
d co
nsci
ous
of G
AD
-rel
ated
pol
icie
s an
d m
anda
tes?
(p
ossi
ble
scor
es a
re 0
, 0.
41, a
nd 0
.83)
Top
man
agem
ent
and
GFP
S m
embe
rs
are
not y
et a
war
e an
d co
nsci
ous
of
GA
D-r
elat
ed p
olic
ies
and
man
date
s
Som
e G
FPS
m
embe
rs a
re a
war
e an
d co
nsci
ous
of
GA
D-r
elat
ed p
olic
ies
and
man
date
s
Som
e to
p m
anag
emen
t and
al
l GFP
S m
embe
rs
are
awar
e an
d co
nsci
ous
of G
AD
-re
late
d po
licie
s an
d m
anda
tes
If ye
s, e
xpla
in h
ow th
e to
p m
anag
emen
t and
G
FPS
mem
bers
man
ifest
aw
aren
ess
and
cons
ciou
snes
s of
GA
D-r
elat
ed p
olic
ies
and
man
date
s (e
.g. t
op m
anag
emen
t app
rove
s an
d di
rect
s im
plem
enta
tion
of G
PB
s, a
ttend
s G
AD
-re
late
d ac
tiviti
es, a
llow
s st
aff t
o pa
rtici
pate
in
GA
D-r
elat
ed a
ctiv
ities
, sup
ports
app
oint
men
t of
qual
ified
wom
en to
man
agem
ent p
ositi
ons,
etc
.)
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
6 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
1.6
Doe
s th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
top
man
agem
ent a
llow
sta
ff m
embe
rs to
par
ticip
ate
in G
AD
-rel
ated
ac
tiviti
es?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
are
0, 0
.41,
and
0.
83)
Top
man
agem
ent
does
not
allo
w
staf
f mem
bers
to
parti
cipa
te in
GA
D-
rela
ted
activ
ities
Top
man
agem
ent
allo
ws
only
the
GFP
S m
embe
rs to
pa
rtici
pate
in G
AD
-re
late
d ac
tiviti
es
Top
man
agem
ent
allo
ws
all k
ey
offic
ials
, GFP
S
mem
bers
and
st
aff m
embe
rs to
pa
rtici
pate
in G
AD
-re
late
d ac
tiviti
es
Atta
ch c
opie
s of
pol
icie
s is
sued
by
top
man
agem
ent a
llow
ing
staf
f mem
bers
to
parti
cipa
te in
GA
D-r
elat
ed a
ctiv
ities
(e.g
. offi
ce
orde
rs, t
rave
l ord
ers,
dep
artm
ent o
rder
s,
exec
utiv
e or
ders
, adm
in m
emos
, etc
.) or
ac
com
plis
h th
e ta
ble
belo
w:
GA
D-
rela
ted
Act
ivity
Par
ticip
ants
O
rgan
izer
Dat
e
Sub-
tota
l GM
EF S
core
(L
evel
1 P
eopl
e)
2. G
AD
Initi
ativ
es &
Cap
acity
Dev
elop
men
t Act
iviti
es (m
ax s
core
: 5; f
or e
ach
item
: 0.8
3)
2.1
Doe
s th
e to
p m
anag
emen
t dire
ct
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
GA
D P
lan
and
Bud
get (
GP
B) o
f the
or
gani
zatio
n? (p
ossi
ble
scor
es a
re 0
, 0.4
1, a
nd
0.83
)
Top
man
agem
ent
does
not
dire
ct G
PB
im
plem
enta
tion
Top
man
agem
ent
appr
oves
GP
B b
ut
not v
isib
le d
urin
g cr
itica
l/sig
nific
ant
GA
D a
ctiv
ities
Top
man
agem
ent
appr
oves
GP
B a
nd
atte
nds
criti
cal /
sign
ifica
nt G
AD
ac
tiviti
es
Cite
crit
ical
inci
dent
s of
top
man
agem
ent
dire
ctin
g th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
GP
B (e
.g. p
rese
nce
or p
artic
ipat
ion
durin
g th
e se
tting
of G
AD
age
nda,
stra
tegi
c pl
anni
ng o
n G
AD
, etc
.)
Atta
ch re
leva
nt d
ocum
ents
indi
catin
g su
ppor
t of
top
man
agem
ent t
o th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of
the
GA
D P
lan
and
Bud
get o
f the
org
aniz
atio
n (e
.g. a
ttend
ance
she
et, c
opy
of O
peni
ng/C
losi
ng
Rem
arks
dur
ing
GA
D tr
aini
ng, p
hoto
s ta
ken
durin
g G
AD
trai
ning
, etc
.)
7GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
2.2
Are
pro
gram
im
plem
ente
rs tr
aine
d on
ge
nder
ana
lysi
s (G
A)
and
the
use
of g
ende
r an
alys
is (G
A) t
ools
? (p
ossi
ble
scor
es a
re 0
, 0.
41, a
nd 0
.83)
Pro
gram
im
plem
ente
rs n
ot y
et
train
ed o
n G
A an
d us
e of
GA
tool
s
Onl
y se
lect
ed
prog
ram
im
plem
ente
rs a
re
train
ed o
n G
A an
d us
e of
GA
tool
s
All
prog
ram
im
plem
ente
rs a
re
train
ed o
n G
A an
d us
e of
GA
tool
s
Enu
mer
ate
train
ing
on G
ende
r Ana
lysi
s (G
A) a
nd
Gen
der A
naly
sis
(GA
) Too
ls a
ttend
ed b
y pr
ogra
m
impl
emen
ters
.
Title
of G
A Tr
aini
ng P
artic
ipan
tsTr
aine
r/
Pro
vide
r D
ate
Atta
ch tr
aini
ng d
esig
n an
d at
tend
ance
she
ets
of
Gen
der A
naly
sis
and
GA
Tool
s tra
inin
g at
tend
ed
by p
rogr
am im
plem
ente
rs.
2.3
Are
con
cern
ed s
taff
mem
bers
trai
ned
in th
e im
porta
nce
of c
olle
ctin
g se
x-di
sagg
rega
ted
data
(SD
D) a
nd g
ende
r st
atis
tics?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
are
0, 0
.41,
and
0.
83)
Con
cern
ed s
taff
mem
bers
are
not
ye
t tra
ined
in th
e im
porta
nce
of
colle
ctin
g S
DD
and
ge
nder
sta
tistic
s
Con
cern
ed s
taff
mem
bers
are
trai
ned
in th
e im
porta
nce
of
colle
ctin
g S
DD
and
ge
nder
sta
tistic
s
Con
cern
ed s
taff
mem
bers
are
trai
ned
in th
e im
porta
nce
of
colle
ctin
g S
DD
and
ge
nder
sta
tistic
s,
and
are
colle
ctin
g th
em
List
dow
n tra
inin
gs c
ondu
cted
for c
once
rned
sta
ff m
embe
rs o
n th
e im
porta
nce
of c
olle
ctin
g se
x-di
sagg
rega
ted
data
and
gen
der s
tatis
tics.
Title
of T
rain
ing
Par
ticip
ants
Dat
e
Con
duct
ed
2.4
Are
mal
e em
ploy
ees
invo
lved
an
d ap
prec
iativ
e of
the
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
ar
e 0,
0.4
1, a
nd 0
.83)
Mal
e em
ploy
ees
do
not p
artic
ipat
e in
the
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps
Mal
e em
ploy
ees
parti
cipa
te in
the
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps
Mal
e em
ploy
ees
initi
ate
and
parti
cipa
te in
the
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps
Pro
vide
list
of t
he o
rgan
izat
ion’
s PA
Ps
initi
ated
an
d/or
par
ticip
ated
by
mal
e em
ploy
ees:
GA
D P
AP
sTy
pe o
f In
volv
emen
t of
Mal
e E
mpl
oyee
s
Par
ticip
ants
*Typ
e of
Invo
lvem
ent o
f Mal
e E
mpl
oyee
s: a
s pa
rtici
pant
s,
orga
nize
rs a
nd/o
r res
ourc
e pe
rson
s in
the
cond
uct o
f the
or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D e
fforts
.
8 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
2.5
Are
clie
nts
(inte
rnal
an
d ex
tern
al) a
war
e of
th
e G
AD
effo
rts o
f the
or
gani
zatio
n? (p
ossi
ble
scor
es a
re 0
, 0.4
1, a
nd
0.83
)
Clie
nts
are
not y
et
orie
nted
on
the
GA
D e
fforts
of t
he
orga
niza
tion
Eith
er in
tern
al o
r ex
tern
al c
lient
s ar
e or
ient
ed o
n th
e G
AD
effo
rts o
f the
or
gani
zatio
n
Bot
h in
tern
al a
nd
exte
rnal
clie
nts
are
orie
nted
on
the
GA
D e
fforts
of t
he
orga
niza
tion
If ye
s, id
entif
y ef
forts
to o
rient
clie
nts
on th
e G
AD
ef
forts
of t
he o
rgan
izat
ion
(e.g
. PC
W w
ebsi
te,
new
s, G
AD
cor
ner i
n th
e or
gani
zatio
n, s
ocia
l m
edia
(FB
, Tw
itter
), am
ong
othe
rs.
Act
ivity
Tar
gete
d A
udie
nce
Dat
e
Con
duct
ed
Als
o at
tach
resu
lts o
f ass
essm
ents
or s
urve
ys
cond
ucte
d to
mea
sure
aw
aren
ess
of c
lient
s (in
tern
al a
nd e
xter
nal)
on th
e G
AD
effo
rts o
f the
or
gani
zatio
n, if
app
licab
le.
2.6
Are
the
clie
nts
(inte
rnal
and
ext
erna
l) ab
le to
arti
cula
te th
eir
gend
er n
eeds
/issu
es
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t of
the
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
ar
e 0,
0.4
1, a
nd 0
.83)
Clie
nts
(inte
rnal
and
ex
tern
al) a
re n
ot
able
to a
rticu
late
ge
nder
nee
ds/is
sues
in
the
deve
lopm
ent
of th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D P
AP
s
Eith
er in
tern
al o
r ex
tern
al c
lient
s ar
e ab
le to
arti
cula
te
gend
er is
sues
/nee
ds
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t of
the
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps
Bot
h in
tern
al a
nd
exte
rnal
clie
nts
are
able
to a
rticu
late
ge
nder
issu
es/n
eeds
in
the
deve
lopm
ent
of th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D P
AP
s
Atta
ch d
ocum
enta
tion
of c
onsu
ltatio
ns/
mee
tings
(e.g
. sur
vey,
focu
s gr
oup
disc
ussi
ons,
ke
y in
form
ant i
nter
view
s) a
nd li
st o
f iss
ues
rais
ed b
y cl
ient
s (in
tern
al a
nd e
xter
nal)
durin
g co
nsul
tatio
ns, e
tc.
Sub-
tota
l GM
EF S
core
(L
evel
2 P
eopl
e)
9GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
3. G
AD
Spo
nsor
ship
& R
elat
ed P
rogr
ams
(max
sco
re: 5
; for
eac
h ite
m: .
83)
3.1
Doe
s th
e to
p m
anag
emen
t dire
ct
the
inte
grat
ion
of
GA
D p
ersp
ectiv
e in
th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
prog
ram
s/ac
tiviti
es/
proj
ects
(PA
Ps)
and
pe
rform
ance
indi
cato
rs?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
are
0,
0.41
, and
0.8
3)
No
initi
al d
iscu
ssio
n am
ong
top
man
agem
ent
offic
ials
on
the
inte
grat
ion
of G
AD
pe
rspe
ctiv
e in
the
orga
niza
tion’
s PA
Ps
and
perfo
rman
ce
indi
cato
rs
With
initi
al
disc
ussi
on a
mon
g to
p m
anag
emen
t of
ficia
ls re
gard
ing
inte
grat
ion
of G
AD
pe
rspe
ctiv
e in
the
orga
niza
tion’
s PA
Ps
and
perfo
rman
ce
indi
cato
rs
Top
man
agem
ent
issu
ed d
irect
ive/
s to
inte
grat
e G
AD
pe
rspe
ctiv
e in
the
orga
niza
tion’
s PA
Ps
and
perfo
rman
ce
indi
cato
rs
Atta
ch d
irect
ive/
s is
sued
by
top
man
agem
ent t
o in
tegr
ate
GA
D p
ersp
ectiv
e in
the
orga
niza
tion’
s pr
ogra
m/a
ctiv
ities
/pro
ject
s (P
AP
s) a
nd
perfo
rman
ce in
dica
tors
.
3.2
Are
the
GFP
S
mem
bers
and
pro
gram
im
plem
ente
rs a
ble
to in
tegr
ate
GA
D
pers
pect
ive
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t of
the
orga
niza
tion’
s pr
ogra
ms/
activ
ities
/ pr
ojec
ts (P
AP
s)?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
are
0,
0.41
, and
0.8
3
GFP
S m
embe
rs
and
prog
ram
im
plem
ente
rs
are
not y
et a
ble
to in
tegr
ate
GA
D
pers
pect
ive
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t of t
he
orga
niza
tion’
s PA
Ps
Eith
er G
FPS
m
embe
rs
or p
rogr
am
impl
emen
ters
are
ab
le to
inte
grat
e G
AD
per
spec
tive
in
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
PAP
s
Bot
h th
e G
FPS
m
embe
rs
and
prog
ram
im
plem
ente
rs a
re
able
to in
tegr
ate
GA
D p
ersp
ectiv
e in
th
e de
velo
pmen
t of
the
orga
niza
tion’
s PA
Ps
Enu
mer
ate
orga
niza
tion
prog
ram
s/ac
tiviti
es/
proj
ects
(PA
Ps)
and
per
form
ance
indi
cato
rs
inte
grat
ed w
ith G
AD
per
spec
tive
by G
FPS
m
embe
rs a
nd p
rogr
am im
plem
ente
rs.
Res
pons
ible
U
nit
Typ
eP
urpo
se/
Sub
ject
M
atte
r
Dat
eIs
sued
GFPS
Prog
ram
Im
plem
ente
rs
10 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
3.3
Are
con
cern
ed s
taff
mem
bers
abl
e to
util
ize
sex-
disa
ggre
gate
d da
ta (S
DD
) and
/or
gen
der s
tatis
tics
for g
ende
r ana
lysi
s (G
A) t
o en
hanc
e th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D
PAP
s? (p
ossi
ble
scor
es
are
0, 0
.41,
and
0.8
3)
Con
cern
ed s
taff
mem
bers
are
not
ye
t abl
e to
util
ize
SD
D a
nd/o
r gen
der
stat
istic
s fo
r GA
Con
cern
ed s
taff
mem
bers
util
ize
SD
D a
nd/o
r gen
der
stat
istic
s fo
r GA
Con
cern
ed s
taff
mem
bers
util
ize
SD
D a
nd/o
r gen
der
stat
istic
s fo
r GA
and
reco
mm
end
stra
tegi
es to
en
hanc
e th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D
PAP
s
If ye
s, e
xpla
in h
ow c
once
rned
sta
ff m
embe
rs
utili
ze s
ex-d
isag
greg
ated
dat
a an
d/or
gen
der
stat
istic
s fo
r gen
der a
naly
sis
to e
nhan
ce th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D P
AP
s.
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
Type
of S
DD
/G
ende
r S
tatis
tics
P/A
/P w
here
S
DD
was
A
pplie
d
GA
D E
fforts
E
nhan
ced
3.4
Doe
s th
e to
p m
anag
emen
t sup
port
the
appo
intm
ent o
f qu
alifi
ed w
omen
sta
ff m
embe
rs to
lead
ersh
ip
posi
tions
? (p
ossi
ble
scor
es a
re 0
, 0.4
1, a
nd
0.83
)
Top
man
agem
ent
does
not
app
oint
w
omen
to le
ader
ship
po
sitio
ns
Top
man
agem
ent
appo
ints
wom
en to
le
ader
ship
pos
ition
bu
t pro
vide
s lim
ited
supp
ort
Top
man
agem
ent
appo
ints
wom
en to
le
ader
ship
pos
ition
an
d pr
ovid
es fu
ll su
ppor
t
Atta
ch d
ocum
ents
issu
ed b
y to
p m
anag
emen
t su
ppor
ting
the
appo
intm
ent o
f qua
lified
wom
en
staf
f mem
bers
in le
ader
ship
pos
ition
s (e
.g.
depa
rtmen
t ord
er o
r exe
cutiv
e or
ders
, lis
t of
train
ing
avai
labl
e, d
ocum
enta
tion
of m
ento
ring
activ
ities
, etc
.).
3.5
Do
wom
en
assu
me
criti
cal r
oles
an
d au
thor
ity in
the
orga
niza
tion?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
are
0, 0
.41,
and
0.
83)
Wom
en o
ccup
y le
ss
than
50%
of t
he
third
leve
l, m
iddl
e m
anag
emen
t and
te
chni
cal p
ositi
ons
in
the
orga
niza
tion
Wom
en o
ccup
y le
ss
than
50%
of t
hird
le
vel p
ositi
ons
but
com
pris
e 50
% o
r m
ore
of th
e m
iddl
e m
anag
emen
t and
te
chni
cal p
ositi
ons
in
the
orga
niza
tion
Wom
en o
ccup
y 50
%
or m
ore
of th
e th
ird
leve
l pos
ition
s in
the
orga
niza
tion
Iden
tify
the
num
ber o
f em
ploy
ees
in th
e fo
llow
ing
posi
tions
:
Pos
ition
No.
of M
enN
o. o
f W
omen
% o
f W
omen
Top
M
anag
emen
t
Mid
dle
M
anag
emen
t
Tech
nica
l Sta
ff
11GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
3.6.
Are
the
clie
nts
(inte
rnal
and
ext
erna
l),
able
to p
artic
ipat
e in
the
plan
ning
and
im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D
PAP
s? (p
ossi
ble
scor
es
are
0, 0
.41,
and
0.8
3)
No
clie
nt (i
nter
nal
and
exte
rnal
) in
volv
emen
t in
the
plan
ning
and
im
plem
enta
tion
of
the
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps
Eith
er in
tern
al o
r ex
tern
al c
lient
s pa
rtici
pate
in th
e pl
anni
ng a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D P
AP
s
Bot
h in
tern
al a
nd
exte
rnal
clie
nts
parti
cipa
te in
the
plan
ning
and
im
plem
enta
tion
of
the
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps
If ye
s, d
escr
ibe
how
clie
nts
(inte
rnal
or e
xter
nal)
parti
cipa
te in
the
plan
ning
and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D P
AP
s.
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__A
ttach
doc
umen
ts s
how
ing
exte
rnal
clie
nts’
m
embe
rshi
p in
the
tech
nica
l wor
king
gro
ups
(TW
Gs)
and
pro
ject
man
agem
ent o
ffice
s (T
WG
s)
as w
ell a
s at
tend
ance
she
ets
and
docu
men
tatio
n of
mee
tings
par
ticip
ated
by
inte
rnal
and
ext
erna
l cl
ient
s.
Sub-
tota
l GM
EF S
core
(L
evel
3 P
eopl
e)
4. G
AD
Cha
mpi
ons
as P
rogr
am Im
plem
ente
rs (m
ax s
core
: 5; f
or e
ach
item
: 0.8
3)
4.1
Are
the
GA
D F
ocal
P
oint
Sys
tem
(GFP
S)
mem
bers
abl
e to
ser
ve
as G
AD
reso
urce
pe
rson
s w
ithin
the
orga
niza
tion,
incl
udin
g its
regi
onal
offi
ces
and
atta
ched
age
ncie
s?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
are
0,
0.41
and
0.8
3)
GFP
S m
embe
rs a
re
not y
et s
ervi
ng a
s re
sour
ce p
erso
ns
on G
AD
with
in th
e or
gani
zatio
n
Less
than
50%
of
the
GFP
S m
embe
rs
are
serv
ing
as
GA
D re
sour
ce
pers
ons
with
in th
e or
gani
zatio
n
50%
or m
ore
of th
e G
FPS
mem
bers
ar
e se
rvin
g as
G
AD
reso
urce
pe
rson
s w
ithin
the
orga
niza
tion
Atta
ch li
st a
nd p
rofil
e of
the
GFP
S m
embe
rs
incl
udin
g th
e G
AD
-rel
ated
trai
ning
con
duct
ed.
Nam
e of
G
FPS
M
embe
r w
ho s
erve
d as
GA
D
Res
ourc
e P
erso
n
Title
of G
AD
A
ctiv
ities
C
ondu
cted
Nam
e of
O
ffice
/Uni
t, R
egio
nal
Offi
ce a
nd/
or A
ttach
ed
Age
ncy
Dat
e C
ondu
cted
12 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
4.2
Doe
s th
e to
p m
anag
emen
t dire
ct
the
mon
itorin
g of
the
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
ar
e 0,
0.4
1 an
d 0.
83)
No
initi
al d
iscu
ssio
n am
ong
top
man
agem
ent
offic
ials
on
the
mon
itorin
g of
the
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps
With
ini
tial
disc
ussi
on a
mon
g to
p m
anag
emen
t of
ficia
ls o
n th
e m
onito
ring
of th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D
PAP
s
Top
man
agem
ent
issu
ed d
irect
ive/
s to
mon
itor t
he
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps
Atta
ch c
opie
s of
dire
ctiv
e/s
issu
ed b
y to
p m
anag
emen
t reg
ardi
ng th
e m
onito
ring
of th
e or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D P
AP
s as
wel
l as
mon
itorin
g re
ports
, as
appl
icab
le.
4.3
Are
con
cern
ed s
taff
mem
bers
abl
e to
adj
ust
GA
D P
AP
s to
add
ress
em
ergi
ng g
ende
r is
sues
? (p
ossi
ble
scor
es a
re 0
, 0.4
1 an
d 0.
83)
Con
cern
ed s
taff
m
embe
rs n
ot a
ble
to a
djus
t GA
D P
AP
s
to a
ddre
ss e
mer
ging
ge
nder
issu
es
Con
cern
ed s
taff
m
embe
rs a
ble
to
iden
tify
emer
ging
ge
nder
issu
es b
ut
are
not c
apab
le o
f ad
dres
sing
them
Con
cern
ed s
taff
m
embe
rs a
ble
to
iden
tify
and
adju
st
GA
D P
AP
s to
ad
dres
s em
ergi
ng
gend
er is
sues
List
dow
n G
AD
PA
Ps
calib
rate
d to
add
ress
em
ergi
ng g
ende
r iss
ues.
Titl
e of
A
djus
ted
GA
D
PAP
s
Em
ergi
ng
Gen
der I
ssue
s A
ddre
ssed
Uni
t/ C
once
rned
S
taff
R
espo
nsib
le
4.4
Do
top
man
agem
ent
and
conc
erne
d st
aff
mem
bers
refle
ct G
AD
fu
nctio
ns in
thei
r pe
rform
ance
con
tract
s or
term
s of
refe
renc
e (T
OR
s)?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
are
0, 0
.41
and
0.83
)
GA
D is
not
refle
cted
in
the
perfo
rman
ce
cont
ract
s or
TO
Rs
of b
oth
top
man
agem
ent a
nd
conc
erne
d st
aff
mem
bers
GA
D re
flect
ed in
th
e pe
rform
ance
co
ntra
cts
or T
OR
s of
eith
er to
p m
anag
emen
t or
conc
erne
d st
aff
mem
bers
GA
D re
flect
ed in
th
e pe
rform
ance
co
ntra
cts
or
TOR
s of
bot
h to
p m
anag
emen
t or
conc
erne
d st
aff
mem
bers
Atta
ch s
ampl
e of
Ter
ms
of R
efer
ence
(TO
Rs)
, P
erfo
rman
ce C
ontra
ct,
Indi
vidu
al P
erfo
rman
ce
Com
mitm
ent a
nd R
evie
w (I
PC
R) f
orm
s of
st
aff m
embe
rs a
nd C
aree
r Exe
cutiv
e S
ervi
ce
Per
form
ance
Eva
luat
ion
Sys
tem
(CE
SP
ES
) of
top
man
agem
ent o
ffici
als
of th
e or
gani
zatio
n
13GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
4.5
Are
con
cern
ed
staf
f mem
bers
abl
e to
de
velo
p to
ols
and/
or
know
ledg
e pr
oduc
ts
(KP
s) o
n G
AD
? (p
ossi
ble
scor
es a
re 0
, 0.
41 a
nd 0
.83)
Con
cern
ed s
taff
mem
bers
not
yet
ab
le to
dev
elop
GA
D
tool
s an
d K
Ps
on
GA
D
Con
cern
ed s
taff
mem
bers
dev
elop
G
AD
tool
s an
d K
Ps
on G
AD
with
as
sist
ance
from
ex
tern
al G
AD
ex
perts
/reso
urce
pe
rson
s
Con
cern
ed s
taff
mem
bers
dev
elop
G
AD
tool
s an
d K
Ps
on G
AD
on
thei
r ow
n
Ple
ase
prov
ide
deta
ils o
f too
ls a
nd/o
r kno
wle
dge
prod
ucts
(KP
s) o
n G
AD
dev
elop
ed.
GA
D T
ools
an
d/or
KP
s D
evel
oped
Pur
pose
Nam
e an
d D
esig
natio
n of
GA
D
expe
rts
tapp
ed fo
r as
sist
ance
4.6
Are
clie
nts
(inte
rnal
an
d ex
tern
al) a
ble
to p
artic
ipat
e in
3
or m
ore
leve
ls o
f th
e de
velo
pmen
t pl
anni
ng c
ycle
of t
he
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
ar
e 0,
0.4
1 an
d 0.
83)
No
parti
cipa
tion
from
cl
ient
s in
all
leve
ls
of th
e de
velo
pmen
t pl
anni
ng c
ycle
of t
he
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps
Eith
er in
tern
al o
r ex
tern
al c
lient
s ha
ve p
artic
ipat
ed
in 1
-2 le
vels
of
the
deve
lopm
ent
plan
ning
cyc
le o
f the
or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D
PAP
s
Bot
h in
tern
al a
nd
exte
rnal
clie
nts
have
par
ticip
ated
in
all
leve
ls o
f th
e de
velo
pmen
t pl
anni
ng c
ycle
of t
he
orga
niza
tion’
s G
AD
PA
Ps
If ye
s, d
escr
ibe
the
parti
cipa
tion
of in
tern
al
and/
or e
xter
nal c
lient
s in
the
deve
lopm
ent
plan
ning
cyc
le (p
lann
ing,
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
anag
emen
t, m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n) o
f the
or
gani
zatio
n’s
GA
D P
AP
s.
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
Sub-
tota
l GM
EF S
core
(L
evel
4 P
eopl
e)
14 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
5.
GA
D E
xper
ts (m
ax s
core
: 5; f
or e
ach
item
, 1.6
7)
5.1
Doe
s th
e to
p m
anag
emen
t rai
se
GA
D c
once
rns
durin
g hi
gh-le
vel m
eetin
gs/
disc
ussi
ons?
(e.g
. C
abin
et c
lust
er
mee
ting,
inte
rnat
iona
l co
nfer
ence
s) (p
ossi
ble
scor
es a
re 0
, 0.8
3 an
d 1.
67)
Top
man
agem
ent
has
not r
aise
d G
AD
co
ncer
ns d
urin
g hi
gh- l
evel
mee
tings
Top
man
agem
ent i
s ab
le to
rais
e G
AD
co
ncer
ns d
urin
g hi
gh-le
vel m
eetin
gs
Top
man
agem
ent
is a
ble
to ra
ise
and
rece
ive
supp
ort o
n G
AD
con
cern
s fro
m
colle
ague
s du
ring
high
-leve
l mee
tings
Atta
ch d
ocum
enta
tion
of m
eetin
gs a
nd/o
r di
scus
sion
s w
here
GA
D c
once
rn/s
was
/wer
e ra
ised
by
the
orga
niza
tion’
s to
p m
anag
emen
t.
Mee
ting/
D
iscu
ssio
nG
AD
C
once
rns
Dis
cuss
ed/
Rai
sed
Nam
e of
Top
M
anag
emen
t w
ho R
aise
d G
AD
C
once
rn
Nam
e of
P
erso
n w
ho
Sup
porte
d th
e G
AD
C
once
rn
5.2
Are
the
orga
niza
tion’
s st
aff
mem
bers
reco
gniz
ed
as G
AD
exp
erts
by
othe
r org
aniz
atio
ns?
(pos
sibl
e sc
ores
are
0,
0.83
and
1.6
7)
Sta
ff m
embe
rs n
ot
yet t
appe
d by
oth
er
orga
niza
tions
Sta
ff m
embe
rs
reco
gniz
ed a
s G
AD
ex
perts
and
tapp
ed
by 1
-4 o
rgan
izat
ions
Sta
ff m
embe
rs
reco
gniz
ed a
s G
AD
exp
erts
and
ta
pped
by
5 or
mor
e or
gani
zatio
ns
Atta
ch li
st a
nd p
rofil
e of
inte
rnal
GA
D e
xper
ts.
Enu
mer
ate
sem
inar
s/co
nfer
ence
s/tra
inin
g fa
cilit
ated
by
inte
rnal
GA
D e
xper
ts fo
r oth
er
agen
cies
and
org
aniz
atio
ns.
Nam
e of
In-
tern
al G
AD
E
xper
t
Title
of G
AD
A
ctiv
ities
C
ondu
cted
Nam
e of
In
vitin
g
O
rgan
izat
ions
Dat
e
Con
duct
ed
15GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People
5.3
Are
ext
erna
l clie
nts
of th
e or
gani
zatio
n re
cogn
ized
as
GA
D c
ham
pion
s by
re
puta
ble
loca
l, na
tiona
l an
d in
tern
atio
nal
orga
niza
tions
? (p
ossi
ble
scor
es a
re 0
, 0.
83 a
nd 1
.67)
Ext
erna
l clie
nts
not y
et re
cogn
ized
fo
r the
ir ge
nder
m
ains
tream
ing
effo
rts
Ext
erna
l clie
nts
rece
ived
no
min
atio
ns o
r ha
ve s
hortl
iste
d an
d/or
cite
d in
thei
r re
spec
tive
loca
litie
s fo
r the
ir ge
nder
m
ains
tream
ing
effo
rts b
y re
puta
ble
loca
l, na
tiona
l an
d in
tern
atio
nal
orga
niza
tions
Ext
erna
l clie
nts
rece
ived
aw
ards
fo
r the
ir ge
nder
m
ains
tream
ing
effo
rts fr
om
repu
tabl
e lo
cal,
natio
nal a
nd
inte
rnat
iona
l or
gani
zatio
ns
Awar
ds/
Cita
tions
/ N
omin
atio
ns
Rec
eive
d
Org
aniz
atio
n C
onfe
rrin
g th
e Aw
ard/
Cita
tion
Dat
e
Con
ferr
ed
Atta
ch c
opie
s of
new
s ar
ticle
s, o
ther
writ
e-up
s or
doc
umen
tatio
n (e
.g. T
V in
terv
iew
s) re
gard
ing
gend
er m
ains
tream
ing
effo
rts o
f the
ext
erna
l cl
ient
s of
the
orga
niza
tion,
if a
pplic
able
.
Sub-
tota
l GM
EF S
core
(L
evel
5 P
eopl
e)
TOTA
L G
MEF
SC
OR
E
(Peo
ple)
