44
The Joint IPEC–PQG Good Manufacturing Practices Audit Guide FOR PHARMACEUTICAL EXCIPIENTS Copyright© 2007 The International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council and Copyright© 2007 Pharmaceutical Quality Group

GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    14

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

The Joint IPEC–PQG Good Manufacturing PracticesAudit Guide

FORPHARMACEUTICAL EXCIPIENTS

Copyright© 2007 The International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council and Copyright© 2007 Pharmaceutical Quality Group

Page 2: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS
Page 3: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

THE JOINT INTERNATIONAL PHARMACEUTICAL EXCIPIENTS COUNCILPHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY GROUP

GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICESAUDIT GUIDE

FORPHARMACEUTICAL EXCIPIENTS

Copyright© 2007 The International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council and Copyright© 2007 Pharmaceutical Quality Group

i

Page 4: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This Guide was prepared by a team from the International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council (IPEC) and the ChartedQuality Institute (CQI) Pharmaceutical Quality Group (PQG).

IPECIPEC is an international industry association formed in 1991 by manufacturers and end-users of excipients. It is an associ-ation comprising three regional pharmaceutical excipient industry associations covering the United States, Europe andJapan (which are known respectively as IPEC-Americas, IPEC Europe and JPEC). IPEC’s objective is to contribute to thedevelopment and harmonization of international excipient standards, the introduction of useful new excipients to the mar-ketplace and the development of good manufacturing practices for excipients.

IPEC first published its GMP Audit Guide for Bulk Pharmaceutical Excipients in 1995 and it was revised in 2004 to alignit with the revised 2001 GMP guide.

For further information see www.ipec.org

PQGThe PQG was formed in 1977 to promote development of a consistent approach to pharmaceutical quality and good manufacturing practice. The group has since expanded and is now incorporated within the United Kingdom’s ChartedQuality Institute.

In 1990 the PQG published three codes of practice to cover pharmaceutical raw materials, printed and contact packaging materials. In 1995 the codes were revised and were integrated ISO 9002:1994. The code for raw materials was revised andreissued as PS 9100:2002 Pharmaceutical Excipients, an application standard and GMP guide for pharmaceutical excipients.

For further information see www.pqg.org

IPEC and PQG greatly appreciate and acknowledge the many hours of hard work the following individuals devoted to creating this Guide and the generous support provided by their employers:

IPEC-AMERICASDale Carter, MS, Archer Daniels Midland Arthur J. Falk, Ph.D., IPEC-AmericasSidney A. Goode, RPh, Pharm.D., The Dow Chemical CompanyMaria Guazzaroni Jacobs, Ph.D., Pfizer, Inc.David B. Klug, MS, sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC.Philip Merrell, Ph.D., Jost Chemical CompanyR Christian Moreton, Ph.D., FinnBrit ConsultingKristin Moore, Archer Daniels Midland Frank Murphy, The Dow Chemical CompanyAnn Perry, The Dow Chemical CompanyPatricia Pranke, International Specialty ProductsDavid R. Schoneker, MS, Colorcon, Inc.Irwin B. Silverstein, Ph.D., IBS Consulting in Quality (committee consultant)Jack Tully, Hercules, Inc.Katherine Ulman, Dow Corning CorporationAnn Van Meter, The Dow Chemical CompanyPhyllis Walsh, Schering-Plough CorporationRobert E. Wiens, MS, Eli Lilly and CompanyPriscilla Zawislak, Hercules, IncRobert Zega, Chr Hansen.

Copyright© 2007 The International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council and Copyright© 2007 Pharmaceutical Quality Group

ii

Page 5: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

IPEC-EUROPEPatricia Rafidison, RPh, Ph D.,Dow CorningKevin McGlue, CSci, CHEM, MRSC, Colorcon, Ltd.Iain Moore, Ph D, CChem MRSC, MCQI, Croda Chemicals Europe LtdGianluca Minestrini, Ph D., F. Hoffmann –La Roche

PQGSteve Moss Ph D, MBA, CChem FRSC, MCQI, GlaxoSmithKline

Copyright© 2007 The International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council and Copyright© 2007 Pharmaceutical Quality Group

iii

Page 6: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

INTRODUCTION

Purpose and ScopeIn the pharmaceutical industry it is the responsibility of the drug product manufacturer to ensure the quality of all startingmaterials and other components contained in or used in the manufacture of the final product dosage form. Throughauditing the producer of pharmaceutical excipients, a user is able to determine whether adequate controls are in place toensure the producer is capable to manufacture a product of suitable quality. The IPEC-PQG GMP Audit Guide, therefore,is designed as a tool to assist in evaluating the manufacturing practices and quality systems of excipient manufacturers. Itis also a helpful reference to assist excipient manufacturers in meeting appropriate cGMP requirements to assure consis-tent product quality.

The Audit Guide is applicable whenever an excipient manufacturer or subcontractor of excipients is audited. It is intendedto have international application, bearing in mind that production of pharmaceutical excipients covers a diverse range ofdifferent industries and processes which often have uses other than pharmaceutical applications. Although the audit mayinclude other areas such as delivery logistics and order processsing, the Audit Guide is intended only to cover aspects ofcurrent Good Manufacturing Practices relating to excipient manufacture. For auditing of repackagers or distributors, seethe IPEC Good Distribution Practices Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients © 2006.

Content and UsageThe Joint IPEC-PQG “Good Manufacturing Practices Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients”©2006 was used as the basisto construct the questions or reminder phrases contained in the Audit Guide, and should serve as the primary source forevaluating responses provided by the auditee. The auditors should be familiar with the introduction, definitions, andgeneral guidance that are contained within the IPEC-PQG GMP Guide, and should refer to the guide if further details are needed.

The Audit Guide is intended to address the foundation of the requirements, and not all of the details, necessary to manu-facture excipients in compliance with applicable GMPs. It may not include all of the appropriate questions / reminderphrases for a specific audit, nor may all of the points be appropriate to every audit. As an international document, it alsocannot specify all national legal requirements, nor cover in detail the particular characteristics of every excipient. How-ever, its use is intended for individuals experienced and competent in the area of auditing who should be diligent inselecting which areas of Good Manufacturing Practice are relevant to a specific particular audit and in determining the ap-propriateness of questions (and the answers provided) based on the characteristics of the excipient manufactured, theprocesses employed, and specific requirements of the excipient user.

FormatThis Audit Guide is provided in two formats, either of which may be used by the auditor based on personal preference:

• Detailed questions arranged in the same sequence as in the GMP Guide. This format is frequently useful as a trainingtool for personnel of both the auditing company and one being audited.

• Short “reminder” phrases arranged in the same sequence as in the GMP Guide, a format which generally is more usefulduring an audit.

Copyright© 2007 The International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council and Copyright© 2007 Pharmaceutical Quality Group

iv

Page 7: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up

TH

E IN

TE

RN

AT

ION

AL

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S C

OU

NC

ILP

HA

RM

AC

EU

TIC

AL

QU

AL

ITY

GR

OU

P

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

EFO

R

PH

AR

MA

CEU

TIC

AL

EXC

IPIE

NTS

FO

RM

AT:

DE

TAIL

ED

QU

ES

TIO

NS

IN S

EQ

UE

NC

E

OF

TH

E J

OIN

T G

MP

GU

IDE

Page 8: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up1

4Q

UA

LIT

Y M

AN

AG

EM

EN

T S

YS

TE

M-E

XC

IPIE

NT

QU

AL

ITY

SY

ST

EM

S

4.1

Gen

eral

Req

uir

emen

ts

4.2

Do

cum

enta

tio

n R

equ

irem

ents

4.2.

1G

ener

al

4.2.

2Q

ual

ity

Man

ual

Is th

ere

a Q

ualit

y M

anua

l and

if s

o, w

hat i

s th

e cu

rren

t ver

sion

of i

t? If

not

, is

ther

e a

suita

ble

alte

rnat

ive?

Is th

ere

a Q

ualit

y P

olic

y or

a s

imila

r st

atem

ent o

f the

inte

nt to

mee

t exc

ipie

ntG

MP

req

uire

men

ts?

Has

the

man

ufac

ture

r de

fined

the

poin

t at w

hich

GM

P s

houl

d be

app

lied

and

mai

ntai

ned?

How

is a

com

mitm

ent t

o ap

plyi

ng th

e ap

prop

riate

GM

Ps

expr

esse

d?H

ow d

oes

it ex

plai

n w

hat a

ctiv

ities

are

cov

ered

by

the

GM

Ps

and

wha

t are

not

?

4.2.

3C

on

tro

l of

Do

cum

ents

Is th

ere

a lis

t of S

tand

ard

Ope

ratin

g P

roce

dure

s (S

OP

s) fo

r ar

eas

of th

e op

erat

ion

affe

ctin

g qu

ality

?.D

oes

the

docu

men

t con

trol

sys

tem

cov

er th

e co

mpl

ete

writ

ten

man

ufac

turin

g in

stru

ctio

ns s

uch

as:

•sp

ecify

qua

ntity

and

iden

tity

of r

aw m

ater

ials

, •

equi

pmen

t, •

man

ufac

turin

g flo

w,

•op

erat

ing

para

met

ers,

in-p

roce

ss s

ampl

ing,

equi

pmen

t cle

anin

g,•

pack

agin

g m

ater

ials

, •

labe

ling,

and

docu

men

tatio

n of

eac

h si

gnifi

cant

ste

p?H

ow a

re c

urre

nt S

OP

s m

ade

read

ily a

vaila

ble

to e

mpl

oyee

s? (

oper

atin

g ro

cedu

res,

man

ufac

turin

g in

stru

ctio

ns a

nd te

st m

etho

ds)

Is th

ere

an S

OP

for

writ

ing,

han

dlin

g an

d up

datin

g S

OP

s?W

hat i

s th

e pr

oced

ure

for p

erio

dic

revi

ew o

f SO

Ps?

Doe

s it

incl

ude

upda

te, a

ndap

prov

al b

y re

spon

sibl

e pe

rson

nel a

nd is

trai

ning

per

form

ed a

fter u

pdat

es?

How

is c

onfo

rman

ce to

SO

Ps

verif

ied

and

docu

men

ted?

Wha

t is

the

syst

em to

ass

ure

that

unn

eede

d or

obs

olet

e do

cum

ents

are

re

mov

ed fr

om u

se?

Are

onl

y cu

rren

t ver

sion

s of

the

docu

men

ts b

eing

use

d?

NO

TE

S

Page 9: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

Are

doc

umen

ts th

at im

pact

pro

duct

qua

lity

revi

ewed

and

app

rove

d by

the

Qua

lity

Uni

t or

othe

r de

sign

ated

qua

lifie

d pe

rson

nel i

ndep

ende

nt fr

om

prod

uctio

n?H

ow a

re d

ocum

ents

con

trol

led

(ele

ctro

nic

and

pape

r co

pies

)? A

re o

bsol

ete

vers

ions

with

draw

n fr

om u

se?

How

are

they

iden

tifie

d? H

ow a

re o

wne

rs

indi

cate

d?

4.2.

4C

on

tro

l of

Rec

ord

s

Wha

t Is

the

syst

em u

sed

to tr

ack,

con

trol

, and

mai

ntai

n al

l rec

ords

that

rel

ate

to th

e re

quire

men

ts o

f the

Qua

lity

Sys

tem

?H

ow a

re u

npla

nned

pro

cess

cha

nges

(pr

oces

s ex

curs

ions

) do

cum

ente

d?W

here

ele

ctro

nic

sign

atur

es a

re b

eing

use

d, a

re th

ey c

ontr

olle

d to

pro

vide

equi

vale

nt a

ssur

ance

to w

ritte

n si

gnat

ures

?Is

the

reco

rd r

eten

tion

polic

y ju

stifi

ed a

nd w

hat i

s th

e ra

tiona

le?

Is th

is

desc

ribed

in a

writ

ten

reco

rds

rete

ntio

n po

licy?

Is a

cop

y of

the

prod

uct l

abel

ret

aine

d w

ith th

e ba

tch

reco

rd?

Are

the

reco

rds

legi

ble,

inde

lible

, sig

ned,

dat

ed a

nd k

ept i

n a

suita

ble

envi

ronm

ent t

o m

inim

ize

dete

riora

tion

or d

amag

e?

4.3

Ch

ang

e C

on

tro

l

Are

ther

e ad

equa

te w

ritte

n pr

oced

ures

for

a ch

ange

con

trol

sys

tem

for

thos

ech

ange

s th

at m

ay h

ave

an im

pact

on

the

qual

ity o

f the

exc

ipie

nt o

r th

eir

conf

orm

ance

to G

MP

? D

oes

it in

clud

e re

view

and

app

rova

l of c

hang

es to

raw

mat

eria

ls, p

roce

sses

, doc

umen

ts, a

nd e

quip

men

t?D

oes

a un

it in

depe

nden

t fro

m p

rodu

ctio

n (e

.g. t

he Q

ualit

y U

nit o

r R

egul

ator

y A

ffairs

) ha

ve th

e re

spon

sibi

lity

and

auth

ority

for

the

final

app

rova

l of c

hang

es?

If th

e co

mpa

ny p

erfo

rms

qual

ifica

tion

and

valid

atio

n ac

tiviti

es, d

oes

the

chan

ge c

ontr

ol s

yste

m p

ick

up th

e re

quire

men

t to

eval

uate

the

impa

ct o

f ach

ange

on

thes

e re

cord

s?D

oes

the

chan

ge c

ontr

ol s

yste

m r

equi

re c

onsi

dera

tion

for

notif

ying

cus

tom

ers

or r

egul

ator

y au

thor

ities

?H

ow d

oes

the

chan

ge c

ontr

ol s

yste

m li

nk to

any

DM

F o

r C

EP

sub

mis

sion

s?Is

a lo

g m

aint

aine

d of

cha

nges

?

5.M

AN

AG

EM

EN

T R

ES

PO

NS

IBIL

ITY

5.1

Man

agem

ent

Co

mm

itm

ent

How

has

Man

agem

ent d

emon

stra

ted

the

impo

rtan

ce o

f cus

tom

er s

atis

fact

ion

and

com

plia

nce?

Is it

doc

umen

ted

in a

form

al s

tate

men

t suc

h as

a c

orpo

rate

Qua

lity

Pol

icy?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up2

Page 10: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

5.2

Cu

sto

mer

Fo

cus

Wha

t is

the

polic

y fo

r ac

com

mod

atin

g cu

stom

er a

udits

of t

he fa

cilit

y?H

ow a

re c

usto

mer

req

uire

men

ts d

eter

min

ed a

nd tr

ansl

ated

into

the

qual

ity

man

agem

ent s

yste

m?

5.3

Qu

alit

y P

olic

y

Wha

t evi

denc

e is

ther

e th

at a

ll pe

rson

nel a

re a

war

e of

the

polic

y?D

oes

the

polic

y su

ppor

t con

tinua

l im

prov

emen

t of t

he q

ualit

y m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

?

5.4

Pla

nn

ing

5.4.

1 Q

ual

ity

Ob

ject

ives

Wha

t mea

sura

ble

obje

ctiv

es h

ave

been

est

ablis

hed

for

conf

orm

ance

to th

e Q

ualit

y S

yste

m a

nd G

MP

req

uire

men

ts?

5.4.

2 Q

ual

ity

Man

agem

ent

Sys

tem

Pla

nn

ing

Wha

t pro

cess

is th

ere

for

iden

tific

atio

n of

ade

quat

e re

sour

ces

need

ed fo

r ad

here

nce

to G

MP

?Is

ther

e an

y ob

serv

able

evi

denc

e th

at a

dequ

ate

reso

urce

s ha

ve n

ot b

een

prov

ided

?

5.5

Res

po

nsi

bili

ty, A

uth

ori

ty a

nd

Co

mm

un

icat

ion

5.5.

1R

esp

on

sib

ility

an

d A

uth

ori

ty

Wha

t mea

ns a

re u

sed

to s

how

the

inde

pend

ent r

epor

ting

rela

tions

hip

betw

een

the

Qua

lity

Uni

t and

Pro

duct

ion?

Are

ther

e or

gani

zatio

n ch

arts

?A

re th

ere

clea

rly w

ritte

n jo

b de

scrip

tions

?W

here

are

the

Qua

lity

Uni

t’s a

utho

rity

and

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

clea

rly d

efin

ed in

w

ritin

g?W

hat d

ocum

enta

tion

supp

orts

the

Qua

lity

Uni

t’s in

depe

nden

t aut

horit

y to

ap

prov

e or

rej

ect p

roce

dure

s, s

peci

ficat

ions

, and

pro

cess

cha

nges

that

po

tent

ially

impa

ct p

rodu

ct q

ualit

y?W

hat d

ocum

enta

tion

show

s th

e Q

ualit

y U

nit h

as in

depe

nden

t aut

horit

y to

re

ject

raw

mat

eria

ls, p

acka

ging

com

pone

nts

and

finis

hed

prod

uct b

atch

es?

Wha

t con

trol

s ar

e in

pla

ce fo

r th

e re

spon

sibi

litie

s of

the

Qua

lity

Uni

t tha

t hav

ebe

en d

eleg

ated

to o

ther

per

sonn

el?

Wha

t rol

e do

es th

e Q

ualit

y U

nit p

lay

in in

vest

igat

ing

devi

atio

ns, f

ailu

res

and

com

plai

nts?

How

doe

s th

e Q

ualit

y U

nit d

ocum

ent t

heir

appr

oval

or

reje

ctio

n of

new

sup

pli-

ers

of q

ualit

y cr

itica

l mat

eria

ls a

nd s

ervi

ces?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up3

Page 11: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

How

doe

s th

e Q

ualit

y U

nit a

chie

ve th

eir

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r th

e re

view

of

appr

opria

te m

anuf

actu

ring

docu

men

tatio

n an

d ba

tch

disp

ositi

on d

ecis

ions

?

5.5.

2M

anag

emen

t R

epre

sen

tati

ve

How

ofte

n do

es th

e m

anag

emen

t rep

rese

ntat

ive

repo

rt o

n th

e co

nfor

man

ce o

fth

e Q

ualit

y S

yste

m to

top

man

agem

ent?

5.5.

3In

tern

al C

om

mu

nic

atio

n

How

are

GM

P a

nd r

egul

ator

y re

quire

men

ts, q

ualit

y po

licie

s, q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

and

proc

edur

es c

omm

unic

ated

thro

ugho

ut th

e or

gani

zatio

n?H

ow is

top

man

agem

ent i

nfor

med

of q

ualit

y cr

itica

l situ

atio

ns?

5.6

Man

agem

ent

Rev

iew

5.6.

1G

ener

al

Doe

s to

p m

anag

emen

t hol

d pe

riodi

c re

view

s to

con

firm

con

tinue

d co

nfor

man

ce to

the

Qua

lity

Man

agem

ent S

yste

m?

How

is to

p m

anag

emen

t inv

olve

men

t dem

onst

rate

d?H

ow a

re th

e op

port

uniti

es fo

r im

prov

emen

t and

the

need

for

chan

ges

capt

ured

, rev

iew

ed, i

mpl

emen

ted

and

reco

rded

?”

5.6.

2R

evie

w In

pu

t

Doe

s th

e m

anag

emen

t rev

iew

inpu

t inc

lude

, for

exa

mpl

e, a

udit

resu

lts,

cust

omer

com

plai

nts

and

feed

back

, pro

duct

con

form

ity, p

roce

ss p

erfo

rman

ce,

stat

us o

f cor

rect

ive

and

prev

entiv

e ac

tions

and

rel

evan

t reg

ulat

ory

/ leg

isla

tion

chan

ges?

5.6.

3R

evie

w O

utp

ut

Doe

s th

e re

view

out

put a

ddre

ss r

esou

rces

nee

ded

for

impr

ovem

ent o

f the

qual

ity m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

and

def

ine

actio

ns to

be

take

n?

6 R

ES

OU

RC

E M

AN

AG

EM

EN

T

6.1

Pro

visi

on

of

Res

ou

rces

Doe

s th

ere

appe

ar to

be

adeq

uate

res

ourc

es to

per

form

and

sup

ervi

se th

e op

erat

ions

nec

essa

ry fo

r pr

oduc

ing,

pac

kagi

ng, t

estin

g, s

torin

g an

d re

leas

ing

exci

pien

ts in

com

plia

nce

with

app

licab

le G

MP

req

uire

men

ts?

6.2

Hu

man

Res

ou

rces

6.2.

1G

ener

al

How

are

qua

lific

atio

ns (

trai

ning

, exp

erie

nce,

and

edu

catio

n) d

ocum

ente

d an

dre

late

d to

the

assi

gned

task

s?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up4

Page 12: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

If us

ed, w

ho r

evie

ws

the

qual

ifica

tions

of c

onsu

ltant

s to

ass

ure

they

hav

e su

ffici

ent e

duca

tion,

trai

ning

, and

exp

erie

nce

to a

dvis

e on

the

subj

ect f

orw

hich

they

are

ret

aine

d?A

re c

onsu

ltant

s an

d co

ntra

ctor

s ap

prop

riate

ly tr

aine

d be

fore

bei

ng a

llow

edin

to th

e fa

cilit

y?

6.2.

2C

om

pet

ence

, Aw

aren

ess

and

Tra

inin

g

Is th

ere

a S

OP

for

iden

tifyi

ng tr

aini

ng n

eeds

and

pro

vidi

ng th

e ne

cess

ary

trai

ning

on

a re

gula

r ba

sis?

Wha

t are

the

qual

ifica

tions

for

indi

vidu

als

perfo

rmin

g G

MP

trai

ning

?A

re jo

b-sp

ecifi

c tr

aini

ng r

equi

rem

ents

cle

arly

def

ined

?H

ow d

oes

the

train

ing

prog

ram

ens

ure

that

per

sonn

el u

nder

stan

d th

at d

evia

tions

from

pro

cedu

res

may

hav

e an

impa

ct o

n th

e cu

stom

er’s

pro

duct

qua

lity?

Is th

ere

pers

onal

hyg

iene

trai

ning

for

pers

onne

l han

dlin

g pr

oduc

t so

they

un

ders

tand

the

prec

autio

ns n

eces

sary

to p

reve

nt th

e co

ntam

inat

ion

of th

e ex

cipi

ent?

How

is it

doc

umen

ted?

Wha

t rec

ords

are

kep

t to

dem

onst

rate

that

GM

P tr

aini

ng is

con

duct

ed in

atim

ely

man

ner

for

new

and

tem

pora

ry e

mpl

oyee

s as

wel

l as

cons

ulta

nts

and

cont

ract

ors?

Wha

t is

the

freq

uenc

y of

con

tinui

ng G

MP

trai

ning

and

is it

suf

ficie

nt to

ens

ure

that

em

ploy

ees

rem

ain

fam

iliar

with

app

licab

le G

MP

req

uire

men

ts?

How

broa

dly

is th

e tr

aini

ng c

ondu

cted

with

in th

e si

te?

How

are

trai

ning

effe

ctiv

enes

s an

d em

ploy

ee c

ompe

tenc

y as

sess

ed?

H

ow is

trai

ning

and

qua

lific

atio

ns d

ocum

ente

d fo

r ea

ch e

mpl

oyee

?H

ow a

re c

hang

es in

reg

ulat

ory

requ

irem

ents

mon

itore

d, in

terp

rete

d, a

nd

com

mun

icat

ed to

em

ploy

ees?

6.2.

3 P

erso

nn

el H

ygie

ne

How

are

per

sonn

el h

ygie

ne r

equi

rem

ents

and

pro

tect

ive

equi

pmen

t spe

cifie

dan

d co

mm

unic

ated

to e

mpl

oyee

s?A

re p

erso

nnel

obs

erve

d to

com

ply

with

requ

irem

ents

for c

lean

lines

s, s

peci

alcl

othi

ng, p

rote

ctio

n, a

nd h

air c

over

ings

as

requ

ired

in th

e va

rious

man

ufac

turin

g,pa

ckag

ing

and

test

ing

area

s? Is

ther

e ap

prop

riate

sig

nage

for s

uch

requ

irem

ents

?A

re p

erso

nnel

req

uire

d to

rep

ort a

ny h

ealth

con

ditio

ns th

at m

ay h

ave

an

adve

rse

effe

ct o

n th

e pr

oduc

t?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up5

Page 13: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

Are

per

sonn

el w

ith il

lnes

s or

ope

n sk

in le

sion

s th

at m

ay c

onta

min

ate

or

othe

rwis

e ad

vers

ely

affe

ct th

e sa

fety

or

qual

ity o

f the

pro

duct

allo

wed

to w

ork

in a

ny o

pera

tion

that

cou

ld c

ause

the

prod

uct t

o be

com

e co

ntam

inat

ed?

Is th

ere

a po

licy

proh

ibiti

ng lo

ose

and/

or u

nsec

ured

jew

elry

or

othe

r ite

ms

inop

erat

ions

whe

re th

ey c

an fa

ll in

to th

e pr

oduc

t? A

re p

erso

nnel

obs

erve

d to

be

in c

ompl

ianc

e?W

here

can

lab

and

oper

atin

g pe

rson

nel s

tore

and

con

sum

e fo

od, b

ever

age,

or to

bacc

o pr

oduc

ts?

Are

thes

e no

n-pr

oduc

tion/

lab

area

s de

sign

ated

?W

hat m

easu

res

with

in th

e fa

cilit

y ha

ve b

een

take

n to

pre

vent

una

utho

rized

and

unes

cort

ed a

cces

s to

crit

ical

pro

cess

ing

oper

atio

ns a

nd o

ther

sen

sitiv

ear

eas?

6.3

Infr

astr

uct

ure

6.3.

1B

uild

ing

s an

d F

acili

ties

Are

ther

e ad

equa

te s

pace

and

env

ironm

enta

l con

trol

s to

ens

ure

prod

uct

inte

grity

and

to p

recl

ude

mix

-ups

or

cros

s-co

ntam

inat

ion,

esp

ecia

lly in

dry

ing,

mill

ing,

ble

ndin

g, p

acka

ging

and

war

ehou

sing

ope

ratio

ns?

Whe

re th

e ex

cipi

ent i

s ex

pose

d, a

re th

ere

adeq

uate

mea

sure

s to

pre

vent

co

ntam

inat

ion,

incl

udin

g m

icro

bial

?W

hat o

ther

mat

eria

ls a

re p

rodu

ced

or s

tore

d in

clo

se p

roxi

mity

to e

xcip

ient

prod

uctio

n or

whe

re it

is e

xpos

ed to

the

envi

ronm

ent?

Doe

s th

e fa

cilit

y us

e or

prod

uce

high

ly s

ensi

tizin

g or

toxi

c su

bsta

nces

? If

so, w

hat c

ontr

ols

are

used

to p

reve

nt c

onta

min

atio

n of

the

exci

pien

t? W

hat e

vide

nce

is th

ere

that

thes

em

easu

res

are

effe

ctiv

e?A

re fa

cilit

ies

mai

ntai

ned

in a

goo

d st

ate

of r

epai

r?A

re th

ere

adeq

uate

labo

rato

ry fa

cilit

ies

to p

erfo

rm r

equi

red

test

ing?

Is th

ere

adeq

uate

spa

ce a

roun

d fin

ishe

d ex

cipi

ent l

ocat

ions

in th

e w

areh

ouse

to fa

cilit

ate

clea

ning

?

6.3.

2E

qu

ipm

ent

How

is e

quip

men

t com

mis

sion

ed p

rior

to in

itial

use

?Is

equ

ipm

ent m

aint

aine

d in

a g

ood

stat

e of

rep

air?

If

proc

essi

ng o

ccur

s ou

tdoo

rs w

hat c

ontr

ols

are

in p

lace

to m

inim

ize

risk

to

exci

pien

t qua

lity?

6.3.

2.1

Eq

uip

men

t Co

nst

ruct

ion

Is e

quip

men

t con

stru

cted

so

that

pro

duct

-con

tact

sur

face

s ar

e no

t rea

c-tiv

e, a

dditi

ve, o

r abs

orpt

ive

and

will

not

adv

erse

ly a

ffect

the

prod

uct?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up6

Page 14: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

Is e

quip

men

t des

igne

d an

d us

ed in

a m

anne

r th

at m

inim

izes

the

pote

ntia

l for

con

tam

inat

ion

of p

rodu

ct w

ith lu

bric

ants

, coo

lant

s, m

etal

or s

eal f

ragm

ents

, or

othe

r ex

tran

eous

mat

eria

ls?

If pr

oduc

t exp

osur

e to

, or

cont

amin

atio

n w

ith, l

ubric

ants

or

cool

ants

ispo

ssib

le, a

re th

ese

mat

eria

ls s

uita

ble

for

use

in fo

od a

pplic

atio

ns?

Wha

t pro

visi

ons

are

mad

e fo

r m

onito

ring

the

prod

uct f

or m

etal

co

ntam

inat

ion

whe

re a

ppro

pria

te?

How

is th

e eq

uipm

ent d

esig

ned,

whe

re n

eces

sary

, to

min

imiz

e th

epo

ssib

ility

of c

onta

min

atio

n fr

om o

pera

tor

cont

act i

n op

erat

ions

suc

has

unl

oadi

ng o

f cen

trifu

ge b

ags,

use

of t

rans

fer

hose

s, a

nd o

pera

tion

of d

ryin

g eq

uipm

ent a

nd p

umps

?

6.3.

2.2

Eq

uip

men

t Mai

nte

nan

ce

Is th

ere

a sy

stem

for

clea

ning

, ins

pect

ing

and

appr

ovin

g eq

uipm

ent

for

use

in m

anuf

actu

ring

afte

r m

aint

enan

ce a

nd r

epai

rs h

ave

been

perfo

rmed

?A

re th

ere

SO

Ps

and

appr

opria

te d

ocum

enta

tion

for i

nspe

ctio

n (m

onito

ring

the

cond

ition

) and

mai

nten

ance

of e

quip

men

t and

for

mea

surin

g an

d te

st in

stru

men

ts?

Do

the

SO

Ps

assi

gn re

spon

sibi

litie

s;in

clud

e sc

hedu

les;

des

crib

e m

etho

ds, a

nd e

quip

men

t, an

d m

ater

ials

to

be

used

?A

re r

ecor

ds k

ept o

f pre

vent

ive

mai

nten

ance

, rep

airs

, and

use

?

6.3.

2.3

Co

mp

ute

r S

yste

ms

If co

mpu

teriz

ed s

yste

ms

are

used

in a

man

ner

that

can

impa

ct

exci

pien

t qua

lity,

hav

e th

ey b

een

dem

onst

rate

d to

con

sist

ently

fu

nctio

n as

exp

ecte

d?

Wha

t pro

cess

is u

sed

to c

ontro

l cha

nges

to s

yste

ms

and

prog

ram

s th

atca

n ha

ve a

n ef

fect

on

the

qual

ity o

f the

pro

duct

(see

4.3

), to

ass

ure

that

chan

ges

rece

ive

the

prop

er re

view

and

app

rova

l with

rega

rd to

pot

entia

lef

fect

s be

fore

bei

ng in

stitu

ted

and

that

onl

y au

thor

ized

per

sonn

el c

anm

ake

such

cha

nges

? A

re p

erso

nnel

trai

ned

subs

eque

nt to

cha

nges

?H

ow is

acc

ess

to c

ompu

teriz

ed s

yste

ms

limite

d in

ord

er to

pro

tect

reco

rds

from

tam

perin

g, a

nd p

reve

nt d

ata

alte

ratio

n?If

pass

wor

ds a

re u

sed

as a

sec

urity

mea

sure

, are

ther

e pr

ovis

ions

for

perio

dic

chan

ging

of p

assw

ords

? A

re th

ere

desi

gnee

s fo

r al

l crit

ical

syst

em o

pera

tions

and

em

erge

ncie

s?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up7

Page 15: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

Wha

t is

the

proc

edur

e fo

r rev

iew

ing

and

upda

ting

secu

rity

acce

ss w

hen

a pe

rson

leav

es th

e de

part

men

t or c

ompa

ny?

Is th

eir a

cces

s to

the

syst

em o

r the

ir ac

cess

cod

es to

the

syst

em re

voke

d in

a ti

mel

y fa

shio

n?W

hat b

acku

p sy

stem

s ar

e in

pla

ce, s

uch

as c

opie

s of

pro

gram

s an

dfil

es, d

uplic

ate

tape

s, o

r m

icro

film

, and

has

ret

rieva

bilit

y of

info

rmat

ion

from

mas

ter

tape

s an

d ba

ckup

tape

s be

en v

erifi

ed?

Are

ther

e pr

oced

ures

in p

lace

for

disa

ster

rec

over

y, in

the

even

t of a

pow

er

outa

ge, l

oss

of s

erve

r an

d co

mpu

teriz

ed s

yste

ms

etc?

6.3.

3U

tilit

ies

Wha

t util

ities

are

use

d in

the

prod

uctio

n, s

tora

ge o

r tr

ansf

er o

f mat

eria

ls th

atco

uld

impa

ct e

xcip

ient

qua

lity?

How

hav

e th

ese

utili

ties

been

ass

esse

d an

dap

prop

riate

act

ion

take

n to

ass

ure

they

do

not c

onta

min

ate

the

exci

pien

t?

6.3.

4W

ater

If w

ater

is u

sed

in th

e m

anuf

actu

re o

f the

exc

ipie

nt, w

hat i

s its

sou

rce

and

is it

suita

ble

for

its in

tend

ed u

se?

If w

ater

is u

sed

whe

re it

cou

ld c

onta

min

ate

the

exci

pien

t, do

es p

roce

ss w

ater

at a

min

imum

mee

t WH

O g

uide

lines

for

drin

king

(po

tabl

e) w

ater

qua

lity?

Isth

ere

an in

tern

al w

ritte

n sp

ecifi

catio

n fo

r pr

oces

s w

ater

?W

here

wat

er c

an im

pact

exc

ipie

nt q

ualit

y:•

How

is p

roce

ss w

ater

per

iodi

cally

mon

itore

d fo

r ch

emic

al a

nd m

icro

bial

qual

ity?

•Is

the

proc

ess

wat

er s

uppl

ied

unde

r co

ntin

uous

pos

itive

pre

ssur

e or

are

othe

r m

eans

use

d to

pre

vent

bac

k flo

w?

•W

here

the

wat

er is

pur

ified

on-

site

, are

ther

e ch

emic

al a

nd m

icro

bial

qua

lity

stan

dard

s an

d ac

tion

limits

for

such

wat

er, w

ith a

n es

tabl

ishe

d m

onito

ring

prog

ram

?•

Whe

re th

e w

ater

is p

urifi

ed, i

s th

e pu

rific

atio

n sy

stem

per

iodi

cally

san

itize

dan

d ap

prop

riate

ly m

aint

aine

d?•

If ch

emic

al o

r m

icro

bial

act

ion

limits

for

proc

ess

or p

urifi

ed w

ater

are

ex

ceed

ed, h

ow is

the

caus

e in

vest

igat

ed, t

he p

robl

em c

orre

cted

, the

impa

ctof

the

cont

amin

atio

n of

pro

duct

s m

anuf

actu

red

with

the

wat

er a

sses

sed,

and

the

resu

lts o

f the

inve

stig

atio

n do

cum

ente

d?

6.4

Wo

rk E

nvir

on

men

t

Are

exp

osed

mat

eria

ls p

rote

cted

from

ove

rhea

d co

ntam

inat

ion?

A

re p

rodu

ctio

n ar

eas

that

pre

sent

pot

entia

l for

con

tam

inat

ion

prop

erly

con

trol

led

and

equi

pped

with

exh

aust

or

othe

r ap

prop

riate

sys

tem

s?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up8

Page 16: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

6.4.

1A

ir H

and

ling

Has

the

effe

ctiv

enes

s of

air

hand

ling

syst

ems

used

to p

rote

ct th

e ex

cipi

ent

been

dem

onst

rate

d to

pro

vide

suc

h pr

otec

tion?

If ai

r is

rec

ircul

ated

to a

reas

whe

re p

rodu

ct is

exp

osed

, is

it fil

tere

d an

d co

ntro

lled

to e

limin

ate

cros

s-co

ntam

inat

ion?

Are

suc

h fil

ters

per

iodi

cally

chec

ked

and

repl

aced

and

whe

re is

this

doc

umen

ted?

6.4.

2C

on

tro

lled

Env

iro

nm

ent

Is th

e m

anuf

actu

ring

envi

ronm

ent a

ppro

pria

tely

con

trol

led

for

the

proc

ess

taki

ng p

lace

to p

rote

ct th

e ex

cipi

ent a

gain

st d

eter

iora

tion

and

cont

amin

atio

n?H

ow is

it m

onito

red?

If a

spec

ial e

nviro

nmen

t is

requ

ired,

is it

con

tinuo

usly

mon

itore

d?In

the

even

t of a

n in

terr

uptio

n to

the

spec

ial e

nviro

nmen

t, is

the

impa

ct u

pon

the

qual

ity o

f the

exc

ipie

nt e

valu

ated

and

doc

umen

ted?

6.4.

3C

lean

ing

an

d S

anit

ary

Co

nd

itio

ns

Are

faci

litie

s m

aint

aine

d in

an

appr

opria

tely

cle

an, s

anita

ry a

nd o

rder

ly

man

ner?

Whe

re e

xcip

ient

qua

lity

can

be a

dver

sely

impa

cted

, are

ther

e ad

equa

tely

de

taile

d S

OP

s fo

r sa

nita

tion

and

clea

ning

? H

ow is

com

plia

nce

mon

itore

d an

d do

cum

ente

d? D

o th

e S

OP

s as

sign

res

pons

ibili

ties;

incl

ude

sche

dule

s;

desc

ribe

met

hods

, equ

ipm

ent,

and

mat

eria

ls to

be

used

; and

req

uire

m

aint

enan

ce o

f rec

ords

?H

ow is

was

te s

egre

gate

d an

d st

orag

e co

ntai

ners

iden

tifie

d? W

hat i

s th

e fr

eque

ncy

of d

ispo

sal?

Has

the

man

ufac

turin

g en

viro

nmen

t bee

n ev

alua

ted

for

the

pote

ntia

l for

co

ntam

inat

ion

by p

hysi

cal o

r ch

emic

al m

ater

ials

or

by m

icro

bes

in th

e ar

ea?

6.4.

4P

est

Co

ntr

ol

Whe

re n

eces

sary

, is

ther

e a

prog

ram

to p

rote

ct q

ualit

y cr

itica

l mat

eria

ls

and

prod

uct f

rom

con

tam

inat

ion

due

to in

sect

s, r

oden

ts, b

irds,

and

oth

er

verm

in (

incl

udin

g do

mes

tic a

nim

als)

? W

hat e

vide

nce

is th

ere

to s

how

that

it

is a

dequ

ate?

Whe

re n

eces

sary

, how

are

win

dow

s, d

oors

, or

othe

r op

enin

gs to

the

outs

ide

adeq

uate

ly p

rote

cted

from

ent

ry b

y pe

sts?

If r

aw m

ater

ials

or

inte

rmed

iate

sar

e st

ored

in s

ilos,

tank

s, o

r ot

her

larg

e co

ntai

ners

, how

are

the

vent

s ad

equa

tely

pro

tect

ed to

pre

vent

ent

ry o

f bird

s an

d in

sect

s?If

used

, are

rod

entic

ides

, her

bici

des

and

pest

icid

es a

ppro

pria

tely

eva

luat

ed?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up9

Page 17: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

If an

out

side

par

ty p

erfo

rms

pest

con

trol

, how

is th

at p

arty

’s p

erfo

rman

ce a

ndco

mpl

ianc

e m

onito

red?

Doe

s th

e pa

rty

use

a si

te m

ap a

nd is

sue

a re

port

? Is

the

repo

rt r

evie

wed

by

the

man

ufac

ture

r?A

re p

est c

ontr

ol r

ecor

ds k

ept?

Wha

t cor

rect

ive

and

prev

entiv

e m

easu

res

have

been

take

n?If

the

natu

re o

f raw

mat

eria

l (su

ch a

s bo

tani

cals

) re

sults

in u

navo

idab

le

cont

amin

atio

n, w

hat a

re th

e co

ntro

ls to

pre

vent

the

incr

ease

or

spre

ad in

co

ntam

inat

ion

or in

fest

atio

n?

6.4.

5L

igh

tin

g

Is th

ere

adeq

uate

ligh

ting?

Is th

e lig

htin

g pr

otec

ted

from

sha

tterin

g in

are

as w

here

the

prod

uct m

ay b

e ex

pose

d?

6.4.

6D

rain

age

Whe

re th

e ex

cipi

ent i

s op

en to

the

envi

ronm

ent,

are

drai

ns o

f ade

quat

e si

ze?

Are

they

equ

ippe

d w

ith a

n ai

r br

eak

or o

ther

mec

hani

sm to

pre

vent

bac

k flo

w?

Is th

e pl

umbi

ng s

yste

m fr

ee o

f def

ects

that

cou

ld c

ause

con

tam

inat

ion

of th

eex

cipi

ent?

6.4.

7W

ash

ing

an

d T

oile

t Fa

cilit

ies

Are

ther

e ad

equa

te h

and

was

hing

, dry

ing

and

sani

tizin

g fa

cilit

ies

at a

ppro

pria

telo

catio

ns in

the

plan

t? A

re a

ll in

goo

d re

pair?

Do

they

pro

vide

hot

and

col

dw

ater

, soa

p or

det

erge

nt, a

nd h

ave

air d

ryer

s or

sin

gle

serv

ice

tow

els?

Are

ther

e cl

ean,

rea

dily

acc

essi

ble

toile

t fac

ilitie

s th

at a

re m

aint

aine

d in

go

od r

epai

r?A

re th

ere

faci

litie

s fo

r sh

ower

ing

and/

or c

hang

ing

clot

hes?

7.P

RO

DU

CT

RE

AL

IZA

TIO

N

7.1

Pla

nn

ing

of

Pro

du

ct R

ealiz

atio

n

Is a

pro

cess

flow

dia

gram

or

othe

r su

itabl

e de

scrip

tion

of th

e pr

oces

s st

eps

avai

labl

e fo

r th

e au

dite

d pr

oduc

ts?

Is th

e un

it op

erat

ion

batc

h or

con

tinuo

us o

r so

me

com

bina

tion

of th

e tw

o?Is

the

exci

pien

t pro

duce

d in

equ

ipm

ent d

edic

ated

to it

s m

anuf

actu

re o

r is

the

equi

pmen

t als

o us

ed fo

r ot

her

prod

ucts

?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up10

Page 18: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

Has

the

proc

ess

been

fully

des

crib

ed r

egar

ding

:•

reac

tions

, •

purif

icat

ions

, •

criti

cal s

teps

, •

oper

atin

g pa

ram

eter

s,

•pr

oces

s lim

itatio

ns,

•im

purit

ies,

and

key

test

s ne

eded

for

proc

ess

cont

rol

•pr

oduc

t spe

cific

atio

ns•

sam

plin

g pl

ans

•te

st a

nd r

elea

se p

roce

dure

s?H

ave

proc

ess

para

met

ers

criti

cal t

o qu

ality

bee

n de

fined

, and

if p

aram

eter

s ar

e ex

ceed

ed, i

s th

e af

fect

on

qual

ity k

now

n?Is

ther

e a

syst

em fo

r id

entif

ying

maj

or e

quip

men

t, in

stru

men

ts, a

nd p

rodu

ctio

nlin

es?

Is th

is in

form

atio

n in

clud

ed in

bat

ch p

rodu

ctio

n an

d co

ntro

l rec

ords

whe

reap

prop

riate

?

7.2

Cu

sto

mer

-Rel

ated

Pro

cess

es

7.2.

1D

eter

min

atio

n o

f R

equ

irem

ents

Rel

ated

to

th

e P

rod

uct

Is th

ere

a sy

stem

to d

eter

min

e cu

stom

er r

equi

rem

ents

rel

ated

to th

e pr

oduc

tan

d su

pply

of t

he p

rodu

ct?

How

doe

s th

e m

anuf

actu

rer

com

mun

icat

e th

e ag

reed

cus

tom

er r

equi

rem

ents

to th

e ap

prop

riate

per

sonn

el?

7.2.

2 R

evie

w o

f R

equ

irem

ents

Rel

ated

to

th

e P

rod

uct

Is th

ere

a pr

oced

ure

in p

lace

to a

ssur

e th

at th

e m

anuf

actu

rer

and

the

cust

omer

hav

e m

utua

lly a

gree

d up

on th

e sp

ecifi

catio

ns a

nd o

ther

re

quire

men

ts?

If no

t, w

hat i

s th

e al

tern

ativ

e pr

oces

s?

7.2.

3 C

ust

om

er C

om

mu

nic

atio

n

Is th

ere

a sy

stem

to a

ssur

e th

at a

ny m

utua

lly a

gree

d cu

stom

er-in

itiat

edch

ange

s ar

e pr

ompt

ly in

corp

orat

ed?

Is th

ere

an a

dequ

ate

syst

em in

pla

ce to

ass

ure

that

sig

nific

ant p

roce

ssch

ange

s, in

clud

ing

the

use

of s

ubco

ntra

ctor

s, a

nd th

eir

effe

ct o

n th

e ex

cipi

ent

are

com

mun

icat

ed to

the

cust

omer

?

7.3

Des

ign

an

d D

evel

op

men

t

How

are

des

ign

and

deve

lopm

ent a

ctiv

ities

tran

slat

ed in

to p

lans

for

man

ufac

turin

g?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up11

Page 19: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

7.4

Pu

rch

asin

g

7.4.

1P

urc

has

ing

Pro

cess

Wha

t is

the

prog

ram

to q

ualif

y or

dis

qual

ify s

uppl

iers

of r

aw m

ater

ials

, pa

ckag

ing

com

pone

nts

and

serv

ices

that

mig

ht a

ffect

qua

lity,

and

to v

erify

th

at th

ey h

ave

capa

bilit

y to

con

sist

ently

mee

t agr

eed-

upon

req

uire

men

ts?

Doe

s th

is p

rogr

am in

clud

e pe

riodi

c au

dits

by

qual

ified

aud

itors

(or

oth

er

verif

icat

ion

tech

niqu

es)

of s

uppl

iers

whe

n de

emed

nec

essa

ry?

Wha

t is

the

prog

ram

for

the

eval

uatio

n an

d ap

prov

al o

f sub

cont

ract

ors?

Doe

s th

is p

rogr

am in

clud

e pe

riodi

c au

dits

of s

ubco

ntra

ctor

s?W

hat s

yste

m is

in p

lace

to fo

llow

up

on c

orre

ctiv

e ac

tions

for

audi

t fin

ding

s fo

r su

pplie

rs a

nd s

ubco

ntra

ctor

s?A

re m

ater

ials

pur

chas

ed a

gain

st a

n ag

reed

spe

cific

atio

n? H

ow is

it e

nsur

edth

at m

ater

ials

are

onl

y pu

rcha

sed

from

app

rove

d su

pplie

rs?

Are

mat

eria

ls p

urch

ased

that

mig

ht r

esul

t in

the

exci

pien

t bei

ng a

t ris

k w

ith

rega

rd to

BS

E/T

SE

, alle

rgen

s, G

MO

etc

?

7.4.

2 P

urc

has

ing

Info

rmat

ion

Hav

e th

e sp

ecifi

catio

ns, w

hich

wer

e ap

prov

ed b

y th

e Q

ualit

y U

nit o

r th

eir

desi

gnee

, for

the

raw

mat

eria

l or

pack

agin

g co

mpo

nent

bee

n pr

ovid

ed to

the

supp

lier

for

revi

ew a

nd c

oncu

rren

ce?

Wha

t sys

tem

is in

pla

ce to

ass

ure

that

revi

sion

s to

the

spec

ifica

tions

are

pro

vide

d on

a ti

mel

y ba

sis

to th

e su

pplie

r?W

hat s

yste

m is

in p

lace

to a

ssur

e th

at s

uppl

iers

and

sub

cont

ract

ors

notif

y th

eco

mpa

ny o

f sig

nific

ant c

hang

es?

How

are

rel

evan

t con

trac

t man

ufac

ture

rs a

nd la

bora

torie

s no

tifie

d of

the

requ

irem

ent t

o ad

here

to a

ppro

pria

te s

ectio

ns o

f the

Gui

de?

7.4.

3V

erif

icat

ion

of

Pu

rch

ased

Pro

du

ct

Are

pro

cedu

res

in p

lace

cov

erin

g th

e m

eans

to q

uara

ntin

e qu

ality

crit

ical

m

ater

ials

on

rece

ipt u

ntil

they

hav

e be

en a

ppro

ved?

Is s

ampl

ing

for

rele

ase

perfo

rmed

acc

ordi

ng to

a p

lan

that

ass

ures

that

the

sam

ple

is r

epre

sent

ativ

e of

the

batc

h? A

re m

etho

ds o

f sam

plin

g de

sign

ed to

prev

ent c

onta

min

atio

n an

d cr

oss-

cont

amin

atio

n?D

o bu

lk d

eliv

erie

s ha

ve a

dditi

onal

con

trol

s to

ass

ure

mat

eria

l pur

ity a

nd

free

dom

from

con

tam

inat

ion

(e.g

. ded

icat

ed ta

nker

s, ta

mpe

r-ev

iden

t sea

ls,

cert

ifica

te o

f cle

anin

g, te

stin

g, a

nd/o

r au

dit o

f the

sup

plie

r?A

re th

ere

adeq

uate

writ

ten

and

appr

oved

inst

ruct

ions

and

spe

cific

atio

ns fo

rqu

ality

crit

ical

mat

eria

l sam

plin

g an

d te

stin

g, in

clud

ing

inve

stig

atio

n of

no

ncon

form

ing

resu

lts?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up12

Page 20: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

If qu

ality

crit

ical

mat

eria

ls a

re a

ccep

ted

on c

ertif

icat

e of

ana

lysi

s (C

OA

), is

at

leas

t an

iden

tific

atio

n te

st p

erfo

rmed

(w

hen

it is

saf

e) o

n ev

ery

batc

h an

d re

ceip

t?If

qual

ity c

ritic

al m

ater

ials

are

acc

epte

d on

CO

A, h

ave

supp

liers

bee

n ap

prop

riate

ly c

ertif

ied

or q

ualif

ied,

incl

udin

g ve

rific

atio

n an

d pe

riodi

c m

onito

ring

of th

e re

sults

on

the

CO

A?

7.5

Pro

du

ctio

n a

nd

Ser

vice

Pro

visi

on

7.5.

1C

on

tro

l of

Pro

du

ctio

n a

nd

Ser

vice

Pro

visi

on

7.5.

1.1

Pro

du

ctio

n In

stru

ctio

ns

and

Rec

ord

s

How

is th

e ex

ecut

ion

of s

igni

fican

t pro

cess

ing

step

s ve

rifie

d?A

re r

ecor

ds a

vaila

ble

and

read

ily r

etrie

vabl

e fo

r ea

ch b

atch

of

exci

pien

ts p

rodu

ced

and

does

it in

clud

e co

mpl

ete

info

rmat

ion

rela

ting

to th

e pr

oduc

tion

and

cont

rol o

f eac

h ba

tch?

Do

reco

rds

incl

ude

info

rmat

ion

such

as:

•da

te/ti

me

each

ste

p w

as c

ompl

eted

, •

iden

tific

atio

n of

per

sons

per

form

ing

and

chec

king

eac

h si

gnifi

cant

oper

atio

n,

•id

entif

icat

ion

of m

ajor

equ

ipm

ent a

nd li

nes,

mat

eria

l inp

uts

to e

nabl

e tr

acea

bilit

y,

•in

-pro

cess

and

labo

rato

ry c

ontr

ol r

esul

ts,

•st

atem

ent o

f yie

ld, u

nles

s no

t qua

ntifi

able

(e.

g. a

s in

som

e co

ntin

uous

pro

cess

es),

•in

spec

tion

of th

e pa

ckag

ing

and

labe

ling

area

bef

ore

and

afte

r us

e,•

labe

ling

cont

rol r

ecor

ds,

•de

scrip

tion

of s

ampl

ing

perfo

rmed

, •

failu

res,

dev

iatio

ns, i

nves

tigat

ions

and

resu

lts o

f fin

al p

rodu

ct in

spec

tion?

7.5.

1.2

Eq

uip

men

t Cle

anin

g

If eq

uipm

ent i

s no

t ded

icat

ed, w

hat o

ther

type

s of

mat

eria

ls a

re

man

ufac

ture

d in

the

sam

e eq

uipm

ent?

Wha

t con

trol

s ar

e us

ed to

pr

even

t cro

ss-c

onta

min

atio

n an

d ho

w h

ave

they

bee

n ju

stifi

ed (

e.g.

mod

el p

rodu

ct)?

Are

ther

e w

ritte

n cl

eani

ng p

roce

dure

s an

d do

they

con

tain

suf

ficie

ntde

tail

to a

llow

ope

rato

rs to

cle

an e

ach

type

of e

quip

men

t in

a re

prod

ucib

le a

nd e

ffect

ive

man

ner?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up13

Page 21: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

For

cont

inuo

us p

roce

ssin

g: is

the

freq

uenc

y of

cle

anin

g sp

ecifi

ed

and

just

ified

?A

re th

ere

data

to s

how

that

cle

anin

g pr

oced

ures

for

non-

dedi

cate

deq

uipm

ent a

re a

dequ

ate

to r

emov

e th

e pr

evio

us m

ater

ials

?H

ave

clea

ning

pro

cedu

res

been

dem

onst

rate

d to

be

effe

ctiv

e?Is

ther

e an

ade

quat

e sy

stem

for

docu

men

ting

clea

ning

and

use

of

the

equi

pmen

t (e.

g., a

cle

anin

g an

d us

e lo

g)?

Are

ute

nsils

and

sam

plin

g de

vice

s cl

eane

d an

d st

ored

in a

pro

per

man

ner

to p

reve

nt c

onta

min

atio

n?D

urin

g a

prod

uctio

n ca

mpa

ign

is th

ere

an e

stab

lishe

d in

terv

al b

etw

een

com

plet

e cl

eani

ngs

of th

e eq

uipm

ent a

nd h

as it

bee

n ju

stifi

ed?

7.5.

1.3

Rec

over

y o

f So

lven

ts, M

oth

er L

iqu

ors

an

d S

eco

nd

Cro

p

Cry

stal

lizat

ion

s

Are

rec

over

ed s

olve

nts

re-u

sed

in th

e sa

me

step

of t

he p

roce

ss o

rca

n th

ey b

e us

ed in

oth

er p

roce

sses

?If

fres

h an

d re

cove

red

solv

ents

are

com

min

gled

, are

the

reco

vere

dso

lven

ts s

ampl

ed a

nd a

ssay

ed a

nd fo

und

to b

e sa

tisfa

ctor

y pr

ior

toco

mm

ingl

ing?

How

is th

e qu

ality

of c

omm

ingl

ed s

olve

nts

mon

itore

don

an

esta

blis

hed

sche

dule

?If

seco

ndar

y re

cove

ry p

roce

dure

s ar

e pe

rform

ed o

n m

othe

r liq

uors

or

filtr

ates

, how

are

the

reco

vere

d m

ater

ials

sho

wn

to m

eet a

pplic

able

spec

ifica

tions

? A

re th

ese

reco

very

pro

cedu

res

writ

ten?

How

is

trac

eabi

lity

mai

ntai

ned?

7.5.

1.4

In-P

roce

ss B

len

din

g/M

ixin

g

Are

ther

e de

fined

ble

ndin

g/m

ixin

g pa

ram

eter

s?W

here

fini

shed

pro

duct

is b

lend

ed o

r m

ixed

, how

has

the

repr

o-du

cibi

lity

of th

e bl

endi

ng o

r m

ixin

g pr

oces

s to

ens

ure

hom

ogen

eity

been

dem

onst

rate

d?Is

the

blen

ding

/mix

ing

equi

pmen

t com

plet

ely

empt

ied

betw

een

batc

hes

or b

etw

een

cam

paig

ns?

If no

t wha

t con

trol

s ar

e ap

plie

d?A

re n

onco

nfor

min

g ba

tche

s bl

ende

d or

mix

ed w

ith o

ther

lots

that

do

conf

orm

to s

peci

ficat

ions

?H

ow a

re ta

iling

s or

par

tial c

onta

iner

s of

exc

ipie

nt h

andl

ed?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up14

Page 22: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

7.5.

1.5

In-P

roce

ss C

on

tro

l

How

is p

roce

ss c

ontr

ol a

ssur

ed?

For

exam

ple,

are

ther

e ap

prov

ed

inst

ruct

ions

, set

-poi

nts,

lim

its, a

nd s

peci

ficat

ions

, whe

re a

ppro

pria

te,

for

such

item

s as

at-

and

in-li

ne te

stin

g, fa

ilure

inve

stig

atio

n, p

roce

ssco

ntro

llers

, etc

.?A

re in

-pro

cess

sam

ples

take

n an

d te

st r

esul

ts r

ecor

ded?

How

are

in

-pro

cess

sam

ples

dis

pose

d of

(no

t ret

urne

d to

pro

duct

ion

for

inco

rpor

atio

n in

to th

e fin

al b

atch

)?

Hav

e pe

rson

nel p

erfo

rmin

g in

pro

cess

test

ing

been

trai

ned

and

is th

etr

aini

ng d

ocum

ente

d?

Do

man

ufac

turin

g in

stru

ctio

ns d

escr

ibe

how

to u

se in

-pro

cess

con

trol

data

to c

ontr

ol th

e pr

oces

s? H

ave

actio

ns to

be

take

n w

hen

the

resu

lts a

re o

utsi

de s

peci

fied

limits

bee

n de

fined

?W

hat i

s th

e fa

te o

f mat

eria

ls th

at fa

il to

mee

t spe

cific

atio

ns o

r ar

e pr

oduc

ed w

hen

the

proc

ess

has

been

dem

onst

rate

d to

be

outs

ide

spec

ified

lim

its?

7.5.

1.6

Pac

kag

ing

an

d L

abel

ing

Is th

ere

a w

ritte

n pr

oced

ure

for

clea

ring

the

pack

agin

g ar

ea a

fter

each

pac

kagi

ng o

pera

tion,

and

cle

anin

g be

fore

the

next

ope

ratio

n,es

peci

ally

if th

e ar

ea is

use

d fo

r pa

ckag

ing

diffe

rent

mat

eria

ls?

Do

proc

edur

es r

equi

re e

xces

s la

bels

to e

ither

be

imm

edia

tely

re

turn

ed to

con

trol

led

stor

age

or d

estr

oyed

? A

re e

xces

s la

bels

w

ith b

atch

num

bers

des

troy

ed?

How

are

labe

ls c

ontr

olle

d?Is

ther

e an

SO

P fo

r th

e re

ceiv

ing,

rev

iew

ing,

han

dlin

g, s

tora

ge,

issu

ance

, and

acc

ount

abili

ty o

f pre

-prin

ted

labe

ls?

If la

bels

are

prin

ted

as n

eede

d, w

hat s

yste

m is

use

d to

ver

ify th

e ac

cura

cy o

f the

labe

ls?

Is th

ere

a pr

oced

ure

to e

nsur

e th

at th

e pr

inte

d la

bels

con

tain

the

corr

ect i

nfor

mat

ion?

7.5.

1.7

Rec

ord

s o

f Eq

uip

men

t Use

How

is th

e se

quen

ce o

f act

iviti

es fo

r ea

ch p

iece

of e

quip

men

t de

mon

stra

ted

i.e. p

rodu

ctio

n, m

aint

enan

ce a

nd c

lean

ing?

7.5.

2 V

alid

atio

n o

f P

roce

sses

for

Pro

du

ctio

n a

nd

Ser

vice

Pro

visi

on

How

has

the

curr

ent p

roce

ss b

een

show

n to

be

capa

ble,

i.e.

, has

it b

een

dem

onst

rate

d to

ope

rate

con

sist

ently

to p

rodu

ce fi

nal m

ater

ial t

hat m

eets

es

tabl

ishe

d sp

ecifi

catio

ns fr

om b

atch

to b

atch

?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up15

Page 23: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

Wha

t tec

hniq

ues

are

used

to d

emon

stra

te o

ngoi

ng p

roce

ss c

apab

ility

? H

ow is

it re

view

ed?

Wha

t det

erm

ines

the

need

for

reva

lidat

ion?

7.5.

3Id

enti

fica

tio

n a

nd

Tra

ceab

ility

7.5.

3.1

Trac

eab

ility

Is th

ere

a sy

stem

in p

lace

to tr

ace

qual

ity-c

ritic

al m

ater

ials

bac

k to

thei

r or

igin

al m

anuf

actu

rers

?Is

an

iden

tific

atio

n co

de a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith e

ach

lot o

f inc

omin

g qu

ality

-cr

itica

l mat

eria

l to

enab

le tr

acea

bilit

y in

the

man

ufac

turin

g op

erat

ion?

Are

bat

ch /

lot n

umbe

rs a

ssig

ned

such

that

they

are

not

dup

licat

edan

d en

able

trac

ing

of a

ll pr

oces

ses

and

batc

h re

cord

s fo

r ea

ch b

atch

?If

proc

essi

ng is

on

a co

ntin

uous

bas

is, h

ow is

a b

atch

def

ined

? Is

the

timef

ram

e du

ring

whi

ch a

par

ticul

ar b

atch

of q

ualit

y-cr

itica

l mat

eria

lw

as p

roce

ssed

thro

ugh

the

plan

t doc

umen

ted?

If a

new

lot n

umbe

r is

ass

igne

d to

a r

epro

cess

ed lo

t, ca

n it

be tr

aced

to th

e or

igin

al b

atch

?If

mul

tiple

site

s pr

oduc

e th

is m

ater

ial,

how

can

the

man

ufac

turin

g si

tebe

det

erm

ined

?

7.5.

3.2

Insp

ectio

n a

nd

Tes

t Sta

tus

Are

qua

lity-

criti

cal m

ater

ials

app

rove

d be

fore

bei

ng u

sed

in

prod

uctio

n? H

ave

requ

irem

ents

bee

n de

fined

for

cont

inuo

usly

fed

qual

ity-c

ritic

al m

ater

ials

?W

hat c

ontr

ols

are

exer

cise

d to

ass

ure

that

qua

lity-

criti

cal m

ater

ials

are

not u

sed

in a

bat

ch p

rior

to r

elea

se b

y th

e Q

ualit

y U

nit?

How

are

con

tain

ers

and

equi

pmen

t lab

eled

to c

lear

ly id

entif

y th

e co

nten

ts a

nd, i

f app

ropr

iate

, the

sta

ge o

f man

ufac

ture

?W

hat s

yste

m is

use

d to

iden

tify

the

stat

us o

f all

qual

ity-c

ritic

al

mat

eria

ls, i

nter

med

iate

s an

d fin

ishe

d pr

oduc

ts?

If fil

led

unla

bele

d co

ntai

ners

are

set

asi

de fo

r fu

ture

labe

ling,

is th

ere

suffi

cien

t ide

ntifi

catio

n to

det

erm

ine

chem

ical

iden

tity,

qua

ntity

, lot

num

ber,

and

othe

r in

form

atio

n ne

eded

for

trac

eabi

lity?

Is th

ere

an e

ffect

ive

syst

em fo

r m

onito

ring

and

rete

stin

g or

re

-eva

luat

ing

stor

ed q

ualit

y-cr

itica

l mat

eria

ls to

ass

ure

that

they

are

not u

sed

beyo

nd th

eir

reco

mm

ende

d ex

pira

tion

or u

se d

ate?

Are

qua

rant

ine

proc

edur

es e

stab

lishe

d w

ith d

esig

nate

d ar

eas,

labe

ls,

or w

ith a

sui

tabl

y co

ntro

lled

com

pute

r sy

stem

?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up16

Page 24: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

7.5.

3.3

Lab

elin

g

Doe

s th

e fin

al p

rodu

ct la

bel c

onta

in a

dequ

ate

info

rmat

ion

to id

entif

yth

e co

nten

ts, q

uant

ity, b

atch

num

ber,

and

man

ufac

ture

r?If

spec

ial s

tora

ge c

ondi

tions

are

nec

essa

ry, b

ased

on

the

resu

lts o

fst

abili

ty te

stin

g, a

re th

ey s

peci

fied

on th

e la

bel?

7.5.

4C

ust

om

er P

rop

erty

If a

cust

omer

sup

plie

s m

ater

ials

for i

ncor

pora

tion

into

the

cust

omer

’s e

xcip

ient

,w

hat s

yste

ms

and

proc

edur

es a

re in

pla

ce fo

r han

dlin

g su

ch m

ater

ials

, inc

ludi

ngve

rific

atio

n, s

tora

ge, m

aint

enan

ce, a

nd a

ccou

ntab

ility

for l

oss

or d

amag

e?H

ow a

re m

ater

ials

sup

plie

d to

the

exci

pien

t pro

duce

r by

the

cust

omer

han

dled

?Is

ther

e a

tech

nica

l or

com

mer

cial

agr

eem

ent i

n pl

ace

to e

nsur

e th

e co

nfid

entia

lity

of a

ny in

telle

ctua

l pro

pert

y pr

ovid

ed b

y th

e cu

stom

er?

How

is th

is c

ontr

olle

d by

the

exci

pien

t man

ufac

ture

r?

7.5.

5P

rese

rvat

ion

of

Pro

du

ct

7.5.

5.1

Han

dlin

g, S

tora

ge,

an

d P

rese

rvat

ion

Is th

e w

areh

ouse

cle

an a

nd w

ell o

rgan

ized

, and

mat

eria

ls e

asily

lo

cate

d? Is

ther

e ad

equa

te s

pace

for

pest

con

trol

and

hou

seke

epin

g?D

oes

the

exci

pien

t man

ufac

ture

r ha

ve a

ny s

cien

tific

evi

denc

e (e

.g.

stab

ility

dat

a) to

indi

cate

acc

epta

ble

cond

ition

s fo

r th

e st

orag

e of

the

exci

pien

t? Is

it k

now

n if

hum

idity

, tem

pera

ture

, or

prot

ectio

n fr

om

light

etc

. are

nec

essa

ry c

ontr

ols

to p

rote

ct th

e ex

cipi

ent?

Are

thes

eco

ntro

ls in

pla

ce?

Are

app

ropr

iate

rec

ords

in p

lace

to d

emon

stra

teth

e im

plem

enta

tion

of th

ese

cont

rols

?W

here

raw

mat

eria

ls o

r in

term

edia

tes

are

stor

ed in

silo

s, ta

nks

orot

her

larg

e co

ntai

ners

, how

is th

e di

spen

sing

of s

uch

mat

eria

ls

mon

itore

d fo

r ap

prop

riate

acc

urac

y?If

mat

eria

ls a

re s

tore

d ou

tsid

e, d

o th

e co

ntai

ners

giv

e ac

cept

able

pr

otec

tion

to th

e co

nten

ts?

Are

labe

ls in

delib

le?

Are

suc

h co

ntai

ners

clea

ned

befo

re th

eir

cont

ents

are

sub

ject

ed to

furt

her

proc

essi

ng?

How

is s

tock

rot

atio

n m

anag

ed (

e.g.

Firs

t in

Firs

t out

; Firs

t exp

ired

Firs

t out

)?

7.5.

5.2

Pac

kag

ing

Sys

tem

s

Wha

t doc

umen

tatio

n su

ppor

ts th

e us

e of

the

cont

aine

r/cl

osur

e sy

stem

, dem

onst

ratin

g th

at it

is a

dequ

ate

to p

rote

ct p

rodu

ct fr

om

dete

riora

tion

and

cont

amin

atio

n an

d th

at it

doe

s no

t alte

r th

e ex

cipi

ent b

eyon

d its

spe

cific

atio

ns?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up17

Page 25: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

How

are

pro

duct

con

tain

ers

and

clos

ures

han

dled

and

sto

red

in o

rder

to p

rote

ct th

em fr

om c

onta

min

atio

n an

d de

terio

ratio

n, a

nd to

pre

vent

mix

-ups

?If

retu

rnab

le e

xcip

ient

con

tain

ers

are

reus

ed, a

re th

ey c

lean

ed u

sing

appr

opria

te c

lean

ing

proc

edur

es a

nd in

spec

ted

befo

re u

se?

Are

pr

evio

us la

bels

rem

oved

or

defa

ced?

If pr

oduc

t is

pack

aged

in tr

ucks

or

railr

oad

cars

, whe

re is

the

clea

ning

of th

e tr

ucks

and

car

s do

cum

ente

d? Is

ther

e a

reco

rd o

f the

pre

viou

spr

oduc

t in

the

truc

k or

rai

lroad

car

?Fo

r no

n-de

dica

ted

truc

ks a

nd r

ailro

ad c

ars,

how

is it

ass

ured

that

ther

e ar

e no

obj

ectio

nabl

e re

sidu

es fr

om p

rior

mat

eria

ls?

Are

all

truc

ks a

nd r

ailro

ad c

ars

insp

ecte

d be

fore

bei

ng fi

lled

with

pr

oduc

t?A

re ta

mpe

r-ev

iden

t sea

ls u

sed

whe

re p

ossi

ble,

incl

udin

g on

truc

ksan

d ra

ilroa

d ca

rs?

7.5.

5.3

Del

iver

y an

d D

istr

ibu

tion

Are

ade

quat

e di

strib

utio

n re

cord

s m

aint

aine

d fo

r all

prod

uct s

hipm

ents

?D

o sh

ippi

ng r

ecor

ds a

llow

trac

eabi

lity

of th

e ba

tch

to s

peci

fic

cons

igne

es a

nd v

ice

vers

a in

cas

e of

a r

etrie

val?

Is th

ere

an S

OP

for

cond

uctin

g a

prod

uct r

etrie

val o

r m

arke

t w

ithdr

awal

? H

ow a

nd w

hen

was

the

proc

edur

e la

st v

erifi

ed?

7.6

Co

ntr

ol o

f M

easu

rin

g a

nd

Mo

nit

ori

ng

Dev

ices

Are

ther

e pr

oced

ures

for

calib

ratio

n of

qua

lity-

criti

cal e

quip

men

t and

for

mea

surin

gan

d te

st in

stru

men

ts?

Do

the

proc

edur

es a

ssig

n re

spon

sibi

litie

s; in

clud

e sc

hedu

les;

desc

ribe

met

hods

, equ

ipm

ent,

and

mat

eria

ls to

be

used

, inc

ludi

ng s

tand

ards

tr

acea

ble

to n

atio

nal s

tand

ards

; def

ine

re-c

alib

ratio

n fr

eque

ncy

and

limits

for

accu

racy

and

pre

cisi

on a

nd r

equi

re m

aint

enan

ce o

f rec

ords

?If

calib

ratio

n op

erat

ions

are

per

form

ed in

-hou

se, d

o th

e pr

oced

ures

spe

cify

ha

ndlin

g an

d st

orag

e co

nditi

ons

for

the

trac

eabl

e st

anda

rds?

Is th

ere

a pr

oced

ure

spec

ifyin

g th

at e

quip

men

t and

inst

rum

ents

can

not b

e us

ed if

they

are

bey

ond

the

calib

ratio

n du

e da

te?

Wha

t act

ions

doe

s th

e ca

libra

tion

proc

edur

e de

scrib

e to

be

take

n re

gard

ing

mea

sure

men

ts d

one

usin

g eq

uipm

ent o

r an

inst

rum

ent t

hat i

s su

bseq

uent

ly fo

und

to h

ave

been

bey

ond

the

due

date

or

out o

f cal

ibra

tion

limits

, and

doe

s it

requ

iredo

cum

enta

tion

of s

uch

actio

ns?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up18

Page 26: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

How

is th

e cu

rren

t cal

ibra

tion

stat

us o

f qua

lity-

criti

cal i

nstr

umen

ts a

nd e

quip

men

tkn

own

to u

sers

?W

here

are

rec

ords

or

logs

mai

ntai

ned

for

calib

ratio

n op

erat

ions

?W

hat i

s th

e sy

stem

for

rout

ine

verif

icat

ion

that

suc

h eq

uipm

ent a

s sc

ales

, pH

m

eter

s, a

nd H

PLC

per

form

as

desi

gned

?

8.M

EA

SU

RE

ME

NT,

AN

ALY

SIS

AN

D IM

PR

OV

EM

EN

T

8.1

Gen

eral

Do

mon

itorin

g an

d m

easu

ring

activ

ities

incl

ude

the

qual

ity m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

s as

wel

l as

para

met

ers

that

def

ine

exci

pien

t qua

lity?

8.2

Mo

nit

ori

ng

an

d M

easu

rem

ent

8.2.

1C

ust

om

er S

atis

fact

ion

How

is c

usto

mer

sat

isfa

ctio

n de

term

ined

? A

re p

aram

eter

s su

ch a

s cu

stom

erco

mpl

aint

s an

d re

turn

of e

xcip

ient

s co

vere

d?D

oes

this

ana

lysi

s dr

ive

impr

ovem

ent a

ctiv

ities

?

8.2.

2In

tern

al A

ud

it

Is th

ere

an in

tern

al q

ualit

y au

dit p

rogr

am th

at c

over

s al

l are

as o

f the

ope

ratio

nto

ver

ify th

at S

OP

s an

d ot

her

proc

edur

es a

nd p

olic

ies

are

bein

g fo

llow

ed, a

ndto

det

erm

ine

effe

ctiv

enes

s of

the

Qua

lity

Sys

tem

? A

re a

udits

per

form

ed a

tsp

ecifi

ed in

terv

als?

Are

aud

its s

ched

uled

on

the

impo

rtan

ce a

nd s

tatu

s of

the

activ

ity p

erfo

rmed

?A

re in

tern

al a

udits

doc

umen

ted?

Are

man

agem

ent p

erso

nnel

aw

are

of th

e au

dit f

indi

ngs

and

the

corr

ectiv

e ac

tions

to b

e ta

ken?

Are

nec

essa

ry s

teps

take

n to

cor

rect

any

are

as o

f non

-com

plia

nce

base

d on

the

findi

ngs

and

reco

mm

enda

tions

of t

he in

tern

al a

udits

? W

ho is

res

pons

ible

for

impl

emen

ting

the

corr

ectiv

e ac

tions

?H

ow a

re c

orre

ctiv

e ac

tions

doc

umen

ted?

Do

follo

w-u

p au

dit a

ctiv

ities

incl

ude

verif

icat

ion

of th

e ef

fect

iven

ess

of

corr

ectiv

e ac

tions

?

8.2.

3M

on

ito

rin

g a

nd

Mea

sure

men

t o

f P

roce

sses

Are

crit

ical

pro

cess

con

trol

poi

nts

and

prod

uct c

hara

cter

istic

s un

der

cont

rol?

A

re a

ppro

pria

te te

chni

ques

app

lied

to v

erify

this

? A

re th

ere

docu

men

ted

proc

edur

es d

efin

ing

the

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d co

ntro

l of

thes

e te

chni

ques

?IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up19

Page 27: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

Wha

t mon

itorin

g oc

curs

of t

he m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

pro

cess

and

pro

cess

fa

ilure

s?H

ow a

re o

ut o

f tre

nd a

nd d

evia

tions

not

ed?

Wha

t act

ions

are

take

n w

hen

thes

e ha

ppen

?

8.2.

4M

on

ito

rin

g a

nd

Mea

sure

men

t o

f P

rod

uct

Are

test

met

hods

doc

umen

ted?

Wha

t evi

denc

e is

ther

e th

at th

e te

st m

etho

ds a

re fi

t for

pur

pose

?If

the

exci

pien

t is

clai

med

to b

e co

mpl

iant

to c

ompe

ndia

l req

uire

men

ts, a

re th

ete

st m

etho

ds th

ose

defin

ed in

the

appr

opria

te p

harm

acop

eia?

If n

ot, h

as th

ete

st m

etho

d be

en s

how

n to

pro

vide

equ

ival

ent r

esul

ts?

Is th

ere

an a

dequ

ate

syst

em fo

r re

view

ing

and

impl

emen

ting

com

pend

ial

chan

ges?

Are

per

iodi

c re

view

s of

pro

duct

qua

lity

and

conf

orm

ance

mea

sure

s co

nduc

ted?

8.2.

4.1

Lab

ora

tory

Co

ntr

ols

Do

labo

rato

ry r

ecor

ds c

onta

in:

•A

sam

ple

desc

riptio

n?•

Bat

ch n

umbe

r?•

Dat

e sa

mpl

e w

as ta

ken?

•Te

st m

etho

d re

fere

nce(

s)?

•R

aw d

ata?

•C

alcu

latio

ns?

•Te

st r

esul

ts a

nd th

eir

com

paris

on to

spe

cific

atio

n?•

Iden

tity

of a

naly

st(s

) an

d th

e da

te e

ach

test

was

per

form

ed?

Are

rea

gent

s an

d so

lutio

ns p

rope

rly la

bele

d? A

re th

ey tr

acea

ble

tore

cord

s de

scrib

ing

thei

r pr

epar

atio

n? D

o th

ey h

ave

an e

xpiry

dat

e in

dica

ted?

Is th

ere

a pr

oced

ure

in p

lace

for

thes

e ac

tiviti

es?

Are

ther

ere

cord

s of

any

sta

ndar

diza

tion?

Are

ref

eren

ce s

tand

ards

pro

perly

labe

led

and

stor

ed in

a m

anne

r to

prot

ect t

hem

from

det

erio

ratio

n? A

re C

ertif

icat

es o

f Ana

lysi

s (C

OA

s)fr

om s

uppl

iers

of p

rimar

y re

fere

nce

stan

dard

s av

aila

ble?

Is th

ere

apr

oced

ure

for

qual

ifica

tion

of s

econ

dary

ref

eren

ce s

tand

ards

incl

udin

gde

finiti

on o

f the

req

ualif

icat

ion

perio

d?

8.2.

4.2

Fin

ish

ed E

xcip

ien

t Tes

ting

an

d R

elea

se

Are

ther

e co

mpl

ete

writ

ten

and

appr

oved

inst

ruct

ions

for

perfo

rmin

gte

stin

g of

fina

l pro

duct

that

spe

cify

met

hods

, equ

ipm

ent,

oper

atin

g pa

ram

eter

s, a

ccep

tanc

e sp

ecifi

catio

ns?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up20

Page 28: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

How

doe

s th

e Q

ualit

y U

nit p

erfo

rm b

atch

rel

ease

incl

udin

g re

view

of

appr

opria

te m

anuf

actu

ring,

pac

kagi

ng, l

abel

ing,

and

test

ing

reco

rds

befo

re b

atch

es a

re r

elea

sed

for

sale

?Is

eve

ry p

rodu

ct b

atch

test

ed a

nd a

ppro

ved

befo

re s

hipm

ent?

If n

ot,

has

the

use

of r

educ

ed te

stin

g be

en ju

stifi

ed?

Wha

t con

trol

s ar

e ap

plie

d to

ass

ure

that

the

exci

pien

t con

form

s to

the

docu

men

ted

spec

ifica

tions

whe

n th

e ex

cipi

ent i

s m

anuf

actu

red

usin

ga

cont

inuo

us p

roce

ss?

8.2.

4.3

Ou

t-o

f-S

pec

ifica

tion

Tes

t Res

ults

Is th

ere

an S

OP

for

inve

stig

atio

n of

Out

-of-

Spe

cific

atio

n (O

OS

) re

sults

and

ret

estin

g, in

clud

ing

a ta

rget

tim

e fr

ame

for

com

plet

ing

inve

stig

atio

ns?

How

are

the

resu

lts e

valu

ated

? U

nder

wha

t con

ditio

ns m

ay a

n O

OS

resu

lt be

dis

coun

ted?

If st

atis

tical

met

hods

are

use

d in

the

eval

uatio

n of

an

OO

S a

re th

eydo

cum

ente

d in

the

rele

vant

SO

P?

Are

inve

stig

atio

ns c

ompl

eted

and

mat

ters

res

olve

d be

fore

bat

ch

rele

ase?

Has

the

impa

ct o

n la

bora

tory

ope

ratio

ns, o

ther

equ

ipm

ent,

batc

hes,

prod

ucts

, etc

. bee

n co

nsid

ered

?

8.2.

4.4

Ret

ain

ed S

amp

les

Are

ret

aine

d sa

mpl

es k

ept f

or e

very

bat

ch fo

r an

app

ropr

iate

inte

rval

?H

ow is

this

inte

rval

def

ined

? D

oes

it re

late

to th

e ex

piry

or

rete

st

inte

rval

ass

igne

d to

the

exci

pien

t? Is

this

doc

umen

ted?

Is th

e re

tain

ed s

ampl

e si

ze a

t lea

st tw

ice

the

amou

nt r

equi

red

to

perfo

rm a

ll sp

ecifi

catio

n te

stin

g?A

re r

etai

ned

sam

ples

app

ropr

iate

ly p

acka

ged

and

stor

ed?

8.2.

4.5

Cer

tific

ates

of A

nal

ysis

(CO

As)

Doe

s th

e ex

cipi

ent m

anuf

actu

rer

prov

ide

CO

As

for

each

bat

ch?

Do

they

com

ply

with

rec

ogni

zed

guid

ance

?D

oes

the

CO

A c

onta

in s

uffic

ient

info

rmat

ion

for

the

inte

nded

use

of

the

exci

pien

t?H

ow a

re th

e re

sults

det

erm

ined

for

each

test

rep

orte

d on

the

CO

A?

Issk

ip lo

t tes

ting

perfo

rmed

and

indi

cate

d?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up21

Page 29: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

8.2.

4.6

Imp

uri

ties

Are

impu

ritie

s kn

own

and

limits

est

ablis

hed?

Hav

e ap

prop

riate

sa

fety

dat

a, r

equi

rem

ents

of o

ffici

al c

ompe

ndia

and

/or

soun

d G

MP

cons

ider

atio

ns b

een

cons

ider

ed in

est

ablis

hing

thos

e lim

its?

Are

man

ufac

turin

g pr

oces

ses

adeq

uate

ly c

ontr

olle

d in

ord

er to

avo

idex

ceed

ing

such

lim

its?

Is te

stin

g pe

rform

ed o

n th

e fin

ishe

d m

ater

ial f

or r

esid

ual s

olve

nts

(esp

ecia

lly th

ose

used

in c

ryst

alliz

atio

n an

d fin

al w

ashe

s) if

use

d in

the

proc

ess?

Are

thes

e re

sults

incl

uded

on

the

CO

A?

8.2.

4.7

Sta

bili

ty

Is s

tabi

lity

or h

isto

rical

dat

a av

aila

ble

to s

uppo

rt th

e re

com

men

ded

stor

age

cond

ition

s?If

an e

xpira

tion

/ re-

eval

uatio

n in

terv

al h

as b

een

assi

gned

how

is th

isin

terv

al d

eter

min

ed?,

Was

it b

ased

on

data

from

a s

tabi

lity

stud

y on

this

pro

duct

or

a si

mila

r pr

oduc

t (“m

odel

pro

duct

” app

roac

h)?

If a

“mod

el p

rodu

ct” a

ppro

ach

is fo

llow

ed, i

s th

ere

a sc

ient

ifica

llyso

und

and

docu

men

ted

ratio

nale

for

the

sele

cted

pro

duct

s?Is

ther

e a

writ

ten

stab

ility

pro

gram

, app

rove

d by

the

Qua

lity

Uni

t tha

tsp

ecifi

es s

ampl

e si

ze, s

tora

ge c

ondi

tions

, tes

ting

inte

rval

s, a

nd te

sts

to b

e pe

rform

ed?

Doe

s th

e co

ntai

ner

used

in s

tabi

lity

test

ing

sim

ulat

e th

e m

arke

t co

ntai

ner?

Are

ass

ay m

etho

ds fo

r st

abili

ty te

stin

g st

abili

ty in

dica

ting?

How

are

sta

bilit

y da

ta r

evie

wed

and

tren

ds m

onito

red,

adv

erse

tren

dsad

dres

sed,

and

app

ropr

iate

man

agem

ent n

otifi

ed?

8.2.

4.8

Exp

iry/

Ret

est P

erio

ds

Is a

n ex

pira

tion

or r

e-ev

alua

tion

date

ass

igne

d to

the

mat

eria

l? I

f so,

wha

t is

it? W

here

is it

list

ed s

o as

to in

form

the

cust

omer

?

8.3

Co

ntr

ol o

f N

on

con

form

ing

Pro

du

ct

Is th

ere

a pr

oced

ure

for

dete

rmin

ing

the

fate

of f

inal

pro

duct

that

fails

to m

eet

spec

ifica

tions

(e.

g., r

epro

cess

ing,

dow

ngra

ding

to a

less

er g

rade

, rel

ease

with

agre

emen

t of t

he c

usto

mer

, des

truc

tion)

?W

hat r

ecor

ds a

re m

aint

aine

d of

non

conf

orm

ing

prod

uct,

rela

ted

inve

stig

atio

ns a

ndco

rrec

tive

actio

ns?

How

are

non

conf

orm

ing

prod

ucts

cle

arly

iden

tifie

d an

d se

greg

ated

to p

reve

nt

unin

tent

iona

l usa

ge o

r sa

le?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up22

Page 30: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

If pr

oduc

t is

to b

e de

stro

yed,

is it

trac

ked,

con

trol

led,

and

des

troy

ed in

a ti

mel

y an

dap

prop

riate

fash

ion?

Are

rec

ords

of s

uch

dest

ruct

ion

mai

ntai

ned?

Is th

ere

a pr

oced

ure

that

des

crib

es h

ow a

n ex

cipi

ent c

an b

e re

trie

ved

from

di

strib

utio

n? A

re r

ecor

ds k

ept o

f suc

h ac

tiviti

es?

8.3.

1R

epro

cess

ing

If re

proc

essi

ng (

repe

atin

g st

eps

that

are

alre

ady

part

of t

he n

orm

al p

roce

ss)

is p

erfo

rmed

, whe

re a

re c

ompl

ete

writ

ten

inst

ruct

ions

foun

d in

clud

ing

any

addi

tiona

l tes

ting

that

may

be

requ

ired?

8.3.

2R

ewo

rkin

g

If re

wor

king

(pe

rform

ing

step

s th

at a

re n

ot p

art o

f the

nor

mal

pro

cess

) is

pe

rform

ed, i

s th

ere

a do

cum

ente

d re

view

of r

isk

to e

xcip

ient

qua

lity

and

appr

oval

by

the

Qua

lity

Uni

t?If

rew

orki

ng is

per

form

ed, i

s th

ere

suffi

cien

t inv

estig

atio

n, e

valu

atio

n an

d do

cum

enta

tion

to a

ssur

e th

at th

e fin

al p

rodu

ct is

at l

east

equ

ival

ent t

o ot

her

acce

ptab

le p

rodu

ct, m

eetin

g al

l est

ablis

hed

stan

dard

s, s

peci

ficat

ions

and

char

acte

ristic

s? Is

the

impa

ct o

n st

abili

ty, i

mpu

ritie

s, e

tc. c

onsi

dere

d an

d ar

eap

prop

riate

con

trol

s ap

plie

d fo

r th

ese

issu

es?

Are

indi

vidu

al n

on-c

onfo

rmin

g ba

tche

s bl

ende

d w

ith o

ther

s?

8.3.

3R

etu

rned

Exc

ipie

nts

Is th

ere

a pr

oced

ure

for

hand

ling

retu

rned

goo

ds, i

nclu

ding

pro

per

iden

tific

a-tio

n, s

egre

gate

d st

orag

e, te

stin

g, a

nd Q

ualit

y U

nit i

nvol

vem

ent i

n th

e ev

alua

-tio

n an

d de

term

inat

ion

of it

s fa

te?

Whe

re a

re r

ecor

ds o

f ret

urne

d go

ods

mai

ntai

ned

and

do th

ose

reco

rds

in-

clud

e th

e ap

prop

riate

info

rmat

ion?

If re

turn

ed g

oods

are

to b

e re

proc

esse

d or

dis

pose

d of

, is

it do

ne a

ccor

ding

toa

proc

edur

e, w

ith Q

ualit

y U

nit i

nvol

vem

ent?

Whe

re is

it d

ocum

ente

d?

8.4

An

alys

is o

f D

ata

Is th

e ef

fect

iven

ess

of th

e Q

ualit

y M

anag

emen

t Sys

tem

eva

luat

ed?

Wha

t mea

sure

s ar

e us

ed a

nd w

hat d

ata

is c

onsi

dere

d to

per

form

this

ana

lysi

s?A

re th

ere

perio

dic

revi

ews

of k

ey in

dica

tors

? W

hat a

re th

ese

indi

cato

rs?

8.5

Imp

rove

men

t

8.5.

1C

on

tin

ual

Imp

rove

men

t

Wha

t inp

uts

driv

e co

ntin

ual i

mpr

ovem

ent a

ctiv

ities

? H

ow a

re th

ese

man

aged

?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up23

Page 31: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

Wha

t pro

cedu

res

are

esta

blis

hed

for

inve

stig

atio

n of

non

conf

orm

ing

prod

ucts

,re

turn

s, c

ompl

aint

s, e

tc.?

How

are

thes

e ca

uses

det

erm

ined

and

how

are

ap

prop

riate

par

ties,

incl

udin

g m

anag

emen

t, no

tifie

d?

8.5.

2C

orr

ecti

ve A

ctio

n

Are

pro

cedu

res

for

corr

ectiv

e ac

tions

impl

emen

ted

to a

ddre

ss th

e ro

ot c

ause

sof

non

conf

orm

ing

prod

ucts

, ret

urns

, and

com

plai

nts?

Are

ther

e pr

oced

ures

in p

lace

to c

over

how

cus

tom

er c

ompl

aint

s, r

etrie

vals

etc

are

rece

ived

and

wha

t act

ions

are

take

n?

8.5.

3P

reve

nti

ve A

ctio

n

Are

pro

cedu

res

for

prev

entiv

e ac

tions

impl

emen

ted

to a

ddre

ss p

robl

ems

at a

leve

l cor

resp

ondi

ng to

the

risk?

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

NO

TE

S

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up24

Page 32: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS
Page 33: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up

TH

E IN

TE

RN

AT

ION

AL

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S C

OU

NC

ILP

HA

RM

AC

EU

TIC

AL

QU

AL

ITY

GR

OU

P

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

EFO

R

PH

AR

MA

CEU

TIC

AL

EXC

IPIE

NTS

FO

RM

AT:

RE

MIN

DE

R P

HR

AS

ES

IN S

EQ

UE

NC

E

OF

TH

E J

OIN

T G

MP

GU

IDE

Page 34: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

4 Q

UA

LIT

Y M

AN

AG

EM

EN

T S

YS

TE

M-E

XC

IPIE

NT

QU

AL

ITY

SY

ST

EM

S

4.1

Gen

eral

Req

uir

emen

ts

4.2

Do

cum

enta

tio

n R

equ

irem

ents

4.2.

1G

ener

al

4.2.

2Q

ual

ity

Man

ual

4.2.

3C

on

tro

l of

Do

cum

ents

4.2.

4C

on

tro

l of

Rec

ord

s

4.3

Ch

ang

e C

on

tro

l

5.

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

RE

SP

ON

SIB

ILIT

Y

5.1

Man

agem

ent

Co

mm

itm

ent

5.2

Cu

sto

mer

Fo

cus

5.3

Qu

alit

y P

olic

y

5.4

Pla

nn

ing

5.4.

1Q

ual

ity

Ob

ject

ives

5.4.

2Q

ual

ity

Man

agem

ent

Sys

tem

Pla

nn

ingIP

EC

-PQ

G G

MP

AU

DIT

GU

IDE

FO

R P

HA

RM

AC

EU

TIC

AL

EX

CIP

IEN

TS

CO

MM

EN

TS

GM

P S

EC

TIO

NIT

EM

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up1

•Q

ualit

y M

anua

l•

Qua

lity

Pol

icy

•G

MP

sta

rtin

g po

int

•W

ritte

n m

anuf

actu

ring

inst

ruct

ions

•P

roce

ss fu

lly d

escr

ibed

•Ve

rific

atio

n of

sig

nific

ant s

teps

•S

OP

ava

ilabi

lity

and

cont

rol

•P

erio

dic

revi

ew o

f SO

Ps

•E

lect

roni

c co

ntro

l

•R

ecor

d re

tent

ion

SO

P•

Goo

d D

ocum

enta

tion

Pra

ctic

es

•C

hang

e co

ntro

l pro

cedu

re•

Con

trol

of p

rodu

ctio

n ch

ange

s•

Inde

pend

ent a

ppro

val o

f cha

nges

•Im

pact

on

qual

ifica

tion

or v

alid

atio

n•

Cha

nge

cont

rol l

og•

Not

ifica

tion

to c

usto

mer

s &

reg

ulat

ory

•C

omm

itmen

t to

cust

omer

sat

isfa

ctio

n•

Com

mitm

ent t

o G

MP

com

plia

nce

•C

usto

mer

req

uire

men

ts•

Cus

tom

er a

udit

polic

y

•P

olic

y de

ploy

men

t, m

anag

emen

t su

ppor

t•

Con

tinua

l im

prov

emen

t

•M

easu

rabl

e co

nfor

man

ce o

bjec

tives

•C

onfo

rman

ce o

bjec

tives

•A

dequ

ate

reso

urce

s

Page 35: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

5.5

Res

po

nsi

bili

ty, A

uth

ori

ty

and

Co

mm

un

icat

ion

5.5.

1R

esp

on

sib

ility

an

d A

uth

ori

ty

5.5.

2M

anag

emen

t R

epre

sen

tati

ve

5.5.

3In

tern

al C

om

mu

nic

atio

n

5.6

Man

agem

ent

Rev

iew

5.6.

1G

ener

al

5.6.

2R

evie

w In

pu

t

5.6.

3R

evie

w O

utp

ut

6.R

ES

OU

RC

E M

AN

AG

EM

EN

T

6.1

Pro

visi

on

of

Res

ou

rces

6.2

Hu

man

Res

ou

rces

6.2.

1G

ener

al

6.2.

2C

ompe

tenc

e,

Aw

aren

ess

and

Trai

ning

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

CO

MM

EN

TS

GM

P S

EC

TIO

NIT

EM

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up2

•R

epor

ting

rela

tions

hip

of Q

ualit

y U

nit

and

Pro

duct

ion

(org

aniz

atio

n ch

arts

)•

Job

desc

riptio

ns•

Cla

rity

of Q

ualit

y U

nit a

utho

rity

and

resp

onsi

bilit

ies,

del

egat

ion

•B

atch

rel

ease

•P

erio

dic

conf

orm

ance

rep

orts

to to

pm

anag

emen

t

•Q

ualit

y sy

stem

com

mun

icat

ion

•To

p m

anag

emen

t not

ifica

tion

of q

ualit

ycr

itica

l iss

ues

•S

enio

r m

anag

emen

t qua

lity

syst

emre

view

•D

efin

ed

•R

esou

rces

and

impr

ovem

ents

id

entif

ied

•A

dequ

ate

reso

urce

s

•E

duca

tion,

trai

ning

exp

erie

nce

•C

onsu

ltant

qua

lific

atio

ns

•A

dequ

ate

trai

ning

exp

erie

nce

and

qual

ifica

tions

•Tr

aini

ng S

OP

•Tr

aini

ng p

rogr

am•

Trai

ner

qual

ifica

tions

•G

MP

trai

ning

rec

ords

•G

MP

trai

ning

freq

uenc

y•

Mea

sure

of t

rain

ing

effe

ctiv

enes

s•

Com

mun

icat

ing

chan

ging

reg

ulat

ions

Page 36: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

6.2.

3P

erso

nn

el H

ygie

ne

6.3

Infr

astr

uct

ure

6.3.

1B

uild

ing

an

d F

acili

ties

6.3.

2E

qu

ipm

ent

6.3.

2.1

Eq

uip

men

t C

on

stru

ctio

n

6.3.

2.2

Eq

uip

men

t M

ain

ten

ance

6.3.

2.3

Co

mp

ute

r S

yste

ms

6.3.

3U

tilit

ies

6.3.

4W

ater

6.4

Wo

rk E

nvir

on

men

t

6.4.

1A

ir H

and

ling

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

CO

MM

EN

TS

GM

P S

EC

TIO

NIT

EM

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up3

•P

erso

nal h

ygie

ne tr

aini

ng•

Clo

thin

g•

Rep

ortin

g of

illn

ess

•Lo

ose

item

s lik

e je

wel

ry a

nd p

ens

•C

onsu

mpt

ion

of fo

od, b

ever

age,

and

toba

cco

prod

ucts

•A

cces

s co

ntro

ls

•S

pace

•C

onta

min

atio

n co

ntro

l•

Toxi

c pr

oduc

ts•

Env

ironm

enta

l con

trol

s •

Labo

rato

ry fa

cilit

ies

•S

tate

of r

epai

r

•C

omm

issi

onin

g•

Mai

nten

ance

•O

utdo

or e

quip

men

t

•C

onta

ct s

urfa

ces

•Lu

bric

ants

,coo

lant

s et

c•

Des

ign

to m

inim

ize

cont

amin

atio

n

•P

roce

dure

s•

Rec

ords

•H

and

over

/ ha

nd b

ack

•A

cces

s co

ntro

ls•

Cha

nge

cont

rols

•C

onsi

sten

t fun

ctio

n•

Bac

k up

, dis

aste

r re

cove

ry

•R

isk

of c

onta

min

atio

n

•S

peci

ficat

ion

•Tr

eatm

ent a

nd m

onito

ring

•P

ositi

ve p

ress

ure

/ bac

k flo

w

•E

ffect

iven

ess

•R

ecirc

ulat

ion

Page 37: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

6.4.

2 C

on

tro

lled

Env

iro

nm

ent

6.4.

3C

lean

ing

an

d S

anit

ary

Co

nd

itio

ns

6.4.

4 P

est

Co

ntr

ol

6.4.

5 L

igh

tin

g

6.4.

5 D

rain

age

6.4.

5 W

ash

ing

an

d

Toile

t Fa

cilit

ies

7.P

RO

DU

CT

RE

AL

IZA

TIO

N

7.1

Pla

nn

ing

of

Pro

du

ct

Rea

lizat

ion

7.2

Cu

sto

mer

-rel

ated

Pro

cess

es

7.2.

1D

eter

min

atio

n o

f R

equ

irem

ents

Rel

ated

to

th

e P

rod

uct

7.2.

2R

evie

w o

f R

equ

irem

ents

Rel

ated

to

th

e P

rod

uct

7.2.

3C

ust

om

er

Co

mm

un

icat

ion

7.3

Des

ign

an

d D

evel

op

men

t

7.4

Pu

rch

asin

g

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

CO

MM

EN

TS

GM

P S

EC

TIO

NIT

EM

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up4

•R

equi

red

•M

onito

ring

•D

evia

tions

•A

ppro

pria

tely

cle

an•

Pro

cedu

res,

sch

edul

es•

Was

te c

ontr

ol

•Fr

ee o

f inf

esta

tion

•C

ontr

acto

r co

ntro

ls•

Rec

ords

, rev

iew

of e

ffect

iven

ess

•A

dequ

ate

•A

dequ

ate

•A

ir br

eak

•A

dequ

ate

faci

litie

s•

Cle

an

•P

roce

ss fl

ow d

iagr

am•

Crit

ical

par

amet

ers

•B

atch

or

cont

inuo

us•

Mul

ti pu

rpos

e•

Equ

ipm

ent &

line

s ID

•C

usto

mer

req

uire

men

ts•

Agr

eed

addi

tiona

l req

uire

men

ts

•M

utua

lly a

gree

d sp

ecifi

catio

ns

•C

ontr

act r

evie

w

•Im

plem

enta

tion

of c

usto

mer

R

equi

rem

ents

•N

otifi

catio

n to

cus

tom

ers

of

sign

ifica

nt c

hang

es

•Te

chno

logy

tran

sfer

Page 38: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

7.4.

1P

urc

has

ing

Pro

cess

7.4.

2P

urc

has

ing

Info

rmat

ion

7.4.

3V

erif

icat

ion

of

Pu

rch

ased

Pro

du

ct

7.5

Pro

du

ctio

n a

nd

S

ervi

ce P

rovi

sio

n

7.5.

1C

on

tro

l of

Pro

du

ctio

n

and

Ser

vice

Pro

visi

on

7.5.

1.1

Pro

du

ctio

n In

stru

ctio

ns

and

Rec

ord

s

7.5.

1.2

Eq

uip

men

t C

lean

ing

7.5.

1.3

Rec

over

y of

Sol

vent

s,

Mot

her

Liqu

ors

and

Sec

ond

Cro

p C

ryst

alliz

atio

nsIPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

CO

MM

EN

TS

GM

P S

EC

TIO

NIT

EM

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up5

•Q

ualif

icat

ion

and

cont

rol o

f sup

plie

rs•

App

rove

d su

pplie

r lis

t•

Aud

it of

key

sup

plie

rs•

Sel

ectio

n an

d co

ntro

l of s

ubco

ntra

ctor

s•

Follo

w-u

p of

aud

it co

rrec

tive

actio

ns•

Mat

eria

l spe

cific

atio

ns•

BS

E/T

SE

,etc

.ris

ks

•P

urch

asin

g ag

reem

ent

•S

uppl

ier

revi

ew o

f spe

cific

atio

ns•

Sup

plie

r no

tific

atio

n of

sig

nific

ant

chan

ge

•P

roce

dure

s fo

r ap

prov

al a

nd r

elea

se•

Qua

rant

ine

•S

ampl

ing

proc

edur

es a

nd c

ondi

tions

•Te

stin

g / v

erifi

catio

n•

Bul

k de

liver

ies

•C

ontr

olle

d m

aste

r ba

tch

inst

ruct

ions

•R

etrie

vabl

e ba

tch

reco

rds

•S

uita

ble

deta

ils

•D

edic

ated

or

cont

rols

for

ross

-con

tam

inat

ion

•C

lean

ing

effe

ctiv

enes

s an

d ju

stifi

catio

n•

Doc

umen

tatio

n of

cle

anin

g•

Sto

rage

of u

tens

ils a

nd s

ampl

ing

devi

ce•

Con

tinuo

us p

roce

sses

, fre

quen

cy o

fcl

eani

ng

•C

ontr

ols

in p

lace

•Tr

acea

bilit

y

Page 39: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

7.5.

1.4

In-P

roce

ss

Ble

nd

ing

/Mix

ing

7.5.

1.5

In-P

roce

ss C

on

tro

l

7.5.

1.6

Pac

kag

ing

an

d L

abel

ing

7.5.

1.7

Rec

ord

s o

f E

qu

ipm

ent

Use

7.5.

2V

alid

atio

n o

f P

roce

sses

fo

r P

rod

uct

ion

an

d

Ser

vice

Pro

visi

on

7.5.

3Id

enti

fica

tio

n a

nd

Tr

acea

bili

ty

7.5.

3.1

Trac

eab

ility

7.5.

3.2

Insp

ecti

on

& T

est

Sta

tus

7.5.

3.3

Lab

elin

g

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

CO

MM

EN

TS

GM

P S

EC

TIO

NIT

EM

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up6

•B

lend

ing

proc

edur

es•

Def

ined

ble

ndin

g pa

ram

eter

s•

Par

t con

tain

ers

/ tai

ls

•P

rogr

am•

Sam

plin

g pr

oced

ures

•R

esul

ts r

ecor

ding

•C

ontr

ol a

ctio

ns

•P

roce

dure

s•

Labe

l con

trol

•M

ix u

p pr

even

tion

•S

eque

nce

of a

ctiv

ities

•P

roce

ss c

onsi

sten

cy

•M

ater

ial t

o th

eir

man

ufac

ture

r•

Mat

eria

l thr

ough

pro

duct

ion

•U

niqu

e ba

tch

num

berin

g•

Bat

ch d

efin

ition

for

cont

inuo

us

proc

essi

ng•

Trac

eabi

lity

of r

epro

cess

ed m

ater

ial

•O

rigin

of m

anuf

actu

ring

site

•A

ppro

val o

f mat

eria

ls &

pac

kagi

ng•

Con

trol

s fo

r un

appr

oved

mat

eria

ls•

Iden

tific

atio

n of

con

tain

ers

and

equi

pmen

t•

Sta

tus

iden

tific

atio

n•

ID o

f unl

abel

ed c

onta

iner

s•

Eva

luat

ion

of r

aw m

ater

ials

bey

ond

expi

ratio

n or

use

dat

e•

Qua

rant

ine

cont

rol

•E

xcip

ient

labe

ling

cont

ent

•S

peci

al s

tora

ge c

ondi

tion

labe

ling

Page 40: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

7.5.

4C

ust

om

er P

rop

erty

7.5.

5P

rese

rvat

ion

of

Pro

du

ct

7.5.

5.1

Han

dlin

g, S

tora

ge,

an

d P

rese

rvat

ion

7.5.

5.2

Pac

kag

ing

Sys

tem

s

7.5.

5.3

Del

iver

y an

d D

istr

ibu

tio

n

7.6

Co

ntr

ol o

f M

easu

rin

g a

nd

M

on

ito

rin

g D

evic

es

8.M

EA

SU

RE

ME

NT,

AN

ALY

SIS

AN

D IM

PR

OV

EM

EN

T

8.1

Gen

eral

8.2

Mo

nit

ori

ng

an

d M

easu

rem

ent

8.2.

1C

ust

om

er S

atis

fact

ion

8.2.

2In

tern

al A

ud

it

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

CO

MM

EN

TS

GM

P S

EC

TIO

NIT

EM

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up7

•P

roce

dure

s•

Agr

eem

ents

for

conf

iden

tial

info

rmat

ion

•A

ppro

pria

te c

ondi

tions

and

rec

ord

•O

utsi

de s

tora

ge•

Bul

k st

orag

e di

spen

sing

•S

tock

rot

atio

n

•A

dequ

ate

prot

ectio

n to

exc

ipie

nt•

Sto

rage

of p

acka

ging

com

pone

nts

•R

eusa

ble

pack

agin

g •

Bul

k co

ntai

ner

clea

nlin

ess

•B

ulk

cont

aine

r se

als

•Ta

mpe

r ev

iden

t sea

ls

•D

istr

ibut

ion

reco

rds

•Tr

acea

ble

to c

onsi

gnee

•R

etrie

val o

r m

arke

t with

draw

al

proc

edur

e

•C

alib

ratio

n pr

oced

ures

, rec

ords

and

stat

us•

Sta

ndar

ds-h

andl

ing

and

stor

age

•Fr

eque

ncy

and

limits

•O

ut o

f cal

ibra

tion

actio

ns

•Q

ualit

y m

anag

emen

t pro

cess

es

•M

easu

rem

ents

(e.

g. c

ompl

aint

s,re

turn

s, fe

edba

ck)

•P

rogr

am, c

ondu

cted

; fre

quen

cy•

Aud

it do

cum

enta

tion

•C

orre

ctiv

e m

easu

res

•Ve

rific

atio

n of

cor

rect

ive

actio

ns

Page 41: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

8.2.

3M

on

ito

rin

g a

nd

M

easu

rem

ent

of

Pro

cess

es

8.2.

4M

on

ito

rin

g a

nd

M

easu

rem

ent

of

Pro

du

ct

8.2.

4.1

Lab

ora

tory

Co

ntr

ols

8.2.

4.2

Fin

ish

ed E

xcip

ien

t Te

stin

g a

nd

Rel

ease

8.2.

4.3

Ou

t-o

f-S

pec

ific

atio

n

Test

Res

ult

s

8.2.

4.4

Ret

ain

ed S

amp

les

8.2.

4.5

Cer

tifi

cate

s o

f A

nal

ysis

8.2.

4.6

Imp

uri

ties

8.2.

4.7

Sta

bili

ty

8.2.

4.8

Exp

iry/

Ret

est

Per

iod

s

IPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

CO

MM

EN

TS

GM

P S

EC

TIO

NIT

EM

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up8

•M

easu

rem

ent o

f crit

ical

pro

cess

co

ntro

l poi

nts

•U

se o

f app

ropr

iate

tech

niqu

es•

Per

iodi

c re

view

and

act

ions

•D

ocum

ente

d te

st m

etho

ds•

Fit

for

purp

ose

•C

ompe

ndia

l met

hods

use

d•

Com

pend

ial c

hang

es•

Per

iodi

c re

view

s of

pro

duct

qua

lity

•P

roce

dure

s an

d re

cord

s•

Rea

gent

s an

d st

anda

rds

•Q

ualit

y U

nit r

espo

nsib

ility

•Te

stin

g in

stru

ctio

ns•

Rel

ease

crit

eria

•C

ontin

uous

pro

cess

es

•P

roce

dure

, rec

ords

and

act

ions

•K

ept,

size

and

sto

rage

•R

eten

tion

perio

d

•Fo

rmat

and

con

tent

•A

lignm

ent t

o sp

ecifi

catio

n•

Ski

p lo

t tes

ting

•D

efin

ed a

nd c

ontr

olle

d•

Res

idua

l sol

vent

s

•D

ata

to s

uppo

rt s

tora

ge c

ondi

tions

•D

eter

min

atio

n of

exp

iry/r

e-ev

alua

tion

perio

d•

Sta

bilit

y pr

ogra

m•

Con

tain

er ty

pe•

Sta

bilit

y in

dica

ting

met

hod

and

para

met

ers

•R

esul

ts r

evie

w a

nd a

ctio

ns

•D

efin

ed a

nd c

omm

unic

ated

Page 42: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

8.3

Co

ntr

ol o

f

No

nco

nfo

rmin

g P

rod

uct

8.3.

1R

epro

cess

ing

8.3.

2R

ewo

rkin

g

8.3.

3R

etu

rned

Exc

ipie

nts

8.4

An

alys

is o

f D

ata

8.5

Imp

rove

men

t

8.5.

1C

on

tin

ual

Imp

rove

men

t

8.5.

2C

orr

ecti

ve A

ctio

n

8.5.

3P

reve

nti

ve A

ctio

nIPE

C-P

QG

GM

P A

UD

IT G

UID

E F

OR

PH

AR

MA

CE

UT

ICA

L E

XC

IPIE

NT

S

CO

MM

EN

TS

GM

P S

EC

TIO

NIT

EM

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 T

he In

tern

atio

nal P

harm

aceu

tical

Exc

ipie

nts

Cou

ncil

and

Cop

yrig

ht©

200

7 P

harm

aceu

tical

Qua

lity

Gro

up9

•P

roce

dure

and

rec

ords

•P

roce

ss fo

ret

rieva

l•

Qua

rant

ine

•D

estr

uctio

n re

cord

s

•R

epro

cess

ing

inst

ruct

ions

•R

ewor

k in

stru

ctio

ns•

Exc

ipie

nt q

ualit

y im

pact

ass

essm

ent

•P

roce

dure

and

rec

ords

•Id

entif

ied

and

quar

antin

ed

•M

easu

res

of Q

ualit

y M

anag

emen

tS

yste

m e

ffect

iven

ess

•Ty

pes

of d

ata

•P

erio

dic

revi

ews

•In

puts

that

iden

tify

cont

inua

l im

prov

emen

t opp

ortu

nitie

s

•R

oot c

ause

ana

lysi

s•

Com

plai

nts

•R

isk

asse

ssm

ent

Page 43: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS
Page 44: GMP Audit Guide - login | IPEC-AMERICAS

Printed in the USA by IPEC-Americas1655 N. Ft. Myer Drive, Suite 700

Arlington, VA 22209