45
GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

GO Content MeetingNovember 15 and 16, 2005

Improving the Representation of

Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Page 2: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Proposal List for GO Content Meeting

A. Self and Non-Self Processes

B. Reorganization of Cytokine Function Terms

C. Adding CD antigen binding terms

D. Improvements to T cell differentiation hierarchy

E. Reorganization of immune response terms in several ways 1) Activation of the immune system vs. effector mechanisms 2) Improving representation of innate immunity 3) Improving representation of immune cell differentiation 4) Improving GO:0006954 inflammatory response

F. The problem of regulation terms under immune response

G. Tumor surveillance terms

Page 3: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Proposal List for GO Content Meeting

A. Self and Non-Self Processes – Amelia and Jane

B. Reorganization of Cytokine Function Terms

C. Adding CD antigen binding terms

D. Improvements to T cell differentiation hierarchy

E. Reorganization of immune response terms in several ways 1) Activation of the immune system vs. effector mechanisms 2) Improving representation of innate immunity 3) Improving representation of immune cell differentiation 4) Improving GO:0006954 inflammatory response

F. The problem of regulation terms under immune response

G. Tumor surveillance terms

Page 4: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Proposal List for GO Content Meeting

A. Self and Non-Self Processes – Amelia and Jane

B. Reorganization of Cytokine Function Terms

C. Adding CD antigen binding terms

D. Improvements to T cell differentiation hierarchy

E. Reorganization of immune response terms in several ways 1) Activation of the immune system vs. effector mechanisms 2) Improving representation of innate immunity 3) Improving representation of immune cell differentiation 4) Improving GO:0006954 inflammatory response

F. The problem of regulation terms under immune response

G. Tumor surveillance terms

Page 5: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Proposal List for GO Content Meeting

A. Self and Non-Self Processes – Amelia and Jane

B. Reorganization of Cytokine Function Terms

C. Adding CD antigen binding terms

D. Improvements to T cell differentiation hierarchy

E. Reorganization of immune response terms in several ways 1) Activation of the immune system vs. effector mechanisms 2) Improving representation of innate immunity 3) Improving representation of immune cell differentiation 4) Improving GO:0006954 inflammatory response

F. The problem of regulation terms under immune response

G. Tumor surveillance terms

Page 6: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Proposal List for GO Content Meeting

A. Self and Non-Self Processes – Amelia and Jane

B. Reorganization of Cytokine Function Terms

C. Adding CD antigen binding terms

D. Improvements to T cell differentiation hierarchy

E. Reorganization of immune response terms in several ways 1) Activation of the immune system vs. effector mechanisms 2) Improving representation of innate immunity 3) Improving representation of immune cell differentiation 4) Improving GO:0006954 inflammatory response

F. The problem of regulation terms under immune response

G. Tumor surveillance terms

Page 7: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Proposal List for GO Content Meeting

A. Self and Non-Self Processes – Amelia and Jane

B. Reorganization of Cytokine Function Terms

C. Adding CD antigen binding terms

D. Improvements to T cell differentiation hierarchy

E. Reorganization of immune response terms in several ways 1) Activation of the immune system vs. effector mechanisms 2) Improving representation of innate immunity 3) Improving representation of immune cell differentiation 4) Improving GO:0006954 inflammatory response

F. The problem of regulation terms under immune response

G. Tumor surveillance terms

Page 8: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Problems for Immunology in the GO

Incomplete Representation of Immunological Processes

Conceptual Problems in Term Organization

Poorly Formulated and Poorly Defined Terms

Page 9: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Incomplete Representation of Immunological Processes Current GO lacks whole groups of terms for processes such as

mucosal immunitytolerance inductionB cell differentiation

And individual terms for important processes such asgranuloma formationgerminal center formationaffinity maturation

Page 10: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Conceptual Problems in Immunology Term Organization in the GO

Terms describing the development of immune system components are incorrectly placed under GO:0006955 immune response, when in fact many of the differentiation steps occur prior to an immune response.

T cell differentiation (T cell development)B cell differentiation (B cell development)

Page 11: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Conceptual Problems in Immunology Term Organization in the GO (2)

The GO terms for cytokine metabolism and cytokine production are children of immune response, when in fact many cytokines are produced independently of immune responses and have non-immunological functions (EGF or TGF-ß, for example).

Page 12: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Conceptual Problems in Immunology Term Organization in the GO (3)

Separate GO terms for antigen processing and antigen presentation exist, without recognition of the relationship of these two concepts. Furthermore, the children of these terms are not well defined and important subprocesses are missing from the GO. This has led to confusion by annotators in the use of these terms, and reflects poorly on the GO.

Page 13: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Conceptual Problems in Immunology Term Organization in the GO (4)

GO:0006955 immune response is a child of defense response in the current GO, yet immune responses include tolerance induction and regulatory processes that are not defense responses.

GO:0006954 inflammatory response is a child of immune response, yet inflammatory responses include non-immunological components.

Page 14: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Poorly Formulated and Poorly Defined Termshumoral immune response ; GO:0006959

--% humoral defense mechanism (sensu Vertebrata) ; GO:0016064

--% humoral defense mechanism (sensu Protostomia) ; GO:0016065

Page 15: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Poorly Formulated and Poorly Defined Termshumoral immune response ; GO:0006959

--% humoral defense mechanism (sensu Vertebrata) ; GO:0016064

--% humoral defense mechanism (sensu Protostomia) ; GO:0016065

An immune response mediated through a body fluid.

Page 16: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Poorly Formulated and Poorly Defined Termshumoral immune response ; GO:0006959

--% humoral defense mechanism (sensu Vertebrata) ; GO:0016064

--% humoral defense mechanism (sensu Protostomia) ; GO:0016065

The specific immune response mediated by antibodies, as in, but not restricted to, the vertebrates (Vertebrata, ncbi_taxonomy_id:7742).

Page 17: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Poorly Formulated and Poorly Defined Termshumoral immune response ; GO:0006959

--% humoral defense mechanism (sensu Vertebrata) ; GO:0016064

--% humoral defense mechanism (sensu Protostomia) ; GO:0016065

The specific immune response mediated by antibodies. As in, but not restricted to, the taxon Protostomia (Protostomia, ncbi_taxonomy_id:33317).

Page 18: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

The Big Picture

Page 19: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

The Big Picture

Page 20: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Assumptions Behind Changes to Immune Response DAG

Current definition of GO:0006955 immune response:

Any process involved in the immunological reaction of an organism to an immunogenic stimulus.

Page 21: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Assumptions Behind Changes to Immune Response DAG

1. Immunological reactions involve largely, but not solely, hematopoietically derived cell types, commonly referred to as immune cells or leukocytes in the GO, and may target any tissue or cell type in the body as well as infecting organisms.

Page 22: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Assumptions Behind Changes to Immune Response DAG

2. An “immunological stimulus” is any stimulus capable of activating an immune response activating cell surface receptor pathway. Such pathways include:

BCR and TCR signaling pathways on mature B and T cellsC-type lectin receptor signaling pathways with activation activitiesKIR signaling pathways with activation activitiesFc receptor signaling pathways with cellular activation activitiesToll-like receptor signaling pathways (and Toll in drosophila)complement receptor signaling pathways with activation activitiescertain other pathways (scavenger receptors etc.)

Page 23: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Assumptions Behind Changes to Immune Response DAG

3. An immune response is considered to be the set of physiological processes carried out by immune cell types and certain additional cell types following an immunological stimulus. Differentiation processes for immune cell types (for instance thymic T cell development) prior to an immunogenic stimulus are not considered part of the immune response.

Page 24: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Assumptions Behind Changes to Immune Response DAG

4. An immune response may be made against both self and non-self determinants. Although the GO is intended to cover "normal" processes, these processes include immune responses against microbes, pests and parasites of all types, whether pathogenic or not, tolerance induction mechanisms against peripheral antigens whether of self or non-self origin, anti-tumor immune responses, and even beneficial autoimmune responses.

Page 25: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Changes to the GO:0006955 immune response hierarchy

Multiple Modes of Immune Response

1. Innate Immune Response

2. Adaptive Immune Response

3. Humoral Immune Response

4. Mucosal Immune Response

Page 26: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Changes to the GO:0006955 immune response hierarchy

Page 27: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Innate Immune Response

Page 28: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Adaptive Immune Response

Page 29: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Humoral Immune Response

Page 30: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Mucosal Immune Response

Page 31: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Activation of the Immune Response

Page 32: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Immune Effector Process

Page 33: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Immune Cell Mediated Immunity

Page 34: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Regulation of Immune Response

Page 35: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Problems with Regulation

GO dogma: positive regulation of a child term is a type of positive regulation of a parent term.

However, this inference is not strictly true for many processes in the immune system.

Page 36: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Problems with Regulation

Page 37: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Problems with Regulation

Page 38: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Problems with Regulation

Page 39: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Inflammatory Response

Page 40: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Tolerance Induction

Page 41: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Cell Activation

The current paradigm in the biological_process ontology is that T cell and B cell differentiation and proliferation are types of T cell and B cell activation, respectively. This DAG structure has certain advantages in annotation of things like T cell proliferation assays.

T cell and B cell activation are defined in the GO to include any type of activation of those cell types, not just activation through the TCR or BCR, and included implicitly in activation are activation steps required for differentiation.

The big change now is that T and B cell differentiation processes prior to an immune response (what immunologists know as T cell development and B cell development) are no longer children of GO:0006955 immune response.

Page 42: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Somatic Diversification of Immune Receptors

Page 43: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Immunoglobulin Production

Page 44: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Outstanding Questions

1. What other pathways of activation constitute immunological stimuli?

2. How should inhibitory pathways (ITIMs) be handled?

3. Should plant innate immunity be included under innate immunity?

4. What other pathways of innate immunity, particularly for invertebrates should be included?

Page 45: GO Content Meeting November 15 and 16, 2005 Improving the Representation of Immunology in the Gene Ontology

Outstanding Questions

5. What is the proper relationship of the inflammatory response to the immune response?

6. Is the cell activation/differentiation/proliferation structure the best way to show the relationships of these terms?

7. Is central tolerance to non-self antigens via upregulation of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cell differentiation an immune response or not?