Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Government of Andhra Pradesh
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES #1
FOR
"AUCTION OF MINING LEASE
FOR
LIMESTONE BLOCKS”
Directorate of Mines & Geology, Government of Andhra Pradesh
8th Floor, BRKR Bhavan,
Saifabad, Hyderabad 500 063
Phone No. 040 23220649 , Fax: 040 23225519
E-mail: [email protected]
NIT Ref: “Invitation of bids for grant of mining lease with respect to (6) limestone blocks in the State of Andhra Pradesh” Dated 10th January 2016
Tender No.: MSTC/HYD/DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, GOVT OF AP/9/NEAR AP SECRETARIAT/15-16/16325[110951] MSTC/HYD/DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, GOVT OF AP/1/NEAR AP SECRETARIAT/15-16/16258[110884] MSTC/HYD/DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, GOVT OF AP/3/NEAR AP SECRETARIAT/15-16/16314[110940] MSTC/HYD/DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, GOVT OF AP/5/NEAR AP SECRETARIAT/15-16/16316[110942] MSTC/HYD/DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, GOVT OF AP/7/NEAR AP SECRETARIAT/15-16/16318[110944] MSTC/HYD/DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, GOVT OF AP/11/NEAR AP SECRETARIAT/15-16/16328[110954]
` REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
1.
Tender
Document &
Summary of
Mineral
Block
(Pillutla
Piduguralla
block)
Page no. 3- Notice Inviting
Tender & Para 2 of Summary
of Mineral Block
Mineral Concession Area of
Block is given as 156.079
Hectares in NIT while in
Summary of Mineral Block it
is given as 187.815 Hectares
Mismatching of Mineral
Concession area is causing
confusion and it should be
same in all Documents.
156.079 Ha is the actual mineral bearing area.
187.815 Ha, mentioned in the Mineral Block
Summary, includes additional 20% area for
mining allied infrastructure and activities.
2.
Summary of
Mineral
Block
(Pillutla
Piduguralla
block)
Para 1 – Corner Points
Coordinates
Coordinates of 3 & 4 no. Point
of PP-2A Sub Block of Block
–II and coordinates of 1 & 2
no. Point of PP-2B Sub Block
of Block –II are same.
Since Southern Boundary of
PP-2A block & Northern
Boundary of PP-2B are
exactly same, they make a
single block. There is no
need of dividing this single
block into 2 nos. of sub
Blocks.
Southern boundary of PP Part-A block
coordinate points fall from A7 to A17,
whereas the Northern boundary of PP Part-B
block coordinate points fall from B1 to B8 and
there is an existing quarry lease which divides
the two blocks. To give more clarity the block
is designated as PP Part-A & Part-B.
3.
Summary of
Mineral
Block
(Pillutla
Piduguralla
block)
Para 1 & Para 2
Corner Points Coordinates &
Total area of Block
When we measure area by
plotting the Corner Points
Coordinates it comes 205
hectares which is not
matching with the area given
in Para 2 as 187.8 Hectares
or 156.079 hectare as per
NIT.
As per the corner coordinate points of the
entire block, the total extent arrives at 235.509
Ha. Of this, 79.430 Ha (existing leased area,
etc.,) is deleted to arrive at the net area of
156.079 Ha. Further, an area of 31.736 Ha.
(about 20%), is ear marked for mining allied
infrastructure and activities. Thus, the total
area is 187.185 Ha.
4. Tender
Document
Clause 2.23
“Specified end use” means
production/ manufacturing of
clinker/cement
1. Please clarify that only
production/ manufacturing of
Clinker satisfy the condition
of “Specific end use” Or
Cement manufacturing is
essential.
2. Is Clinker produced for
sale fulfill Specified End
use.
1) “Specified end use” also includes
production/manufacturing of clinker.
2) Clinker produced for sale also fulfils the
“Specified end use” clause.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
5. Tender
Document
Clause 5.3 (c) & Schedule C
of MDPA
A Bidder, who proposes to
set up a clinker/ cement plant
in Andhra Pradesh, shall
submit the certified true copy
of Board Resolution signed
by the Company Secretary in
support of the same. The
bidder should indicate the
target capacity of the plant
and timeline for construction.
Such plant should commence
operations within 2 years
from the date of grant of
Mining Lease and before the
commencement of production
of mineral or as may be
permitted by the State
Government. The production
of limestone shall be
exclusively for captive use of
the plant; and no outside sale
of limestone will be
permitted.
1. Is clinker/cement plant of
any capacity eligible? Is the
Bidder allowed to propose
EUP ( End Use Plant) of any
capacity?
2. Commencement of
operation of Plant means
commencement of
Production. It is not possible
before commencement of
Mineral Production as
Mineral mined will be the
basic Raw material for Plant
Production. Even sufficient
stock of Mineral i.e.
Limestone is required to start
operation of Cement Plant.
3. The present exploration
level of block is G3. Is it
permitted to change
proposed plant capacity
based on revised Reserve (on
lower side particularly) after
detail exploration.
4. If Bidder is not able to
complete the Plant
commissioning within 2
years what will be the
impacts. As there is lot of
uncertainties in installation
of plant like Land
Acquisition & various other
Government permissions
which is not in full control of
Bidder.
Clarification is required for
business decision.
1) The bidder is allowed to propose EUP.
However, the installed capacity of clinker
plant, not cement, shall be either equivalent to
or more than the total estimated Limestone
reserves for a period of 50 years.
2) Tender conditions prevail -
„Such plant should commence operations
within 2 years from the date of grant of
Mining Lease and before the commencement
of production of mineral or as may be
permitted by the State Government.‟
3) If required, the successful bidder, is allowed
to re-assess the Limestone reserves in the
knocked down Limestone block. Proposals for
modification of installed capacity, if any,
according to the revised Limestone reserves
will be examined.
4) In event of delay in commencement of
operations, the Government may initiate
action as per clause 8 of MPDA document.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
6. Tender
Document
Clause 5.4
A bidder shall disclose all
mining leases for limestone
held in the state of Andhra
Pradesh along with the
mineral reserves available in
the said leases as on the date
of the NIT and shall not be in
arrears of mineral revenue to
the state government.
Is this Information is also
required for the area for
which Letter of Intent (LOI)
has been issued to the Bidder
by Andhra Pradesh
Government.
The bidder shall disclose all the mining leases
along with the areas for which LOI has been
issued by Government of Andhra Pradesh.
7. Tender
Document
Clause 7.6
The State Government shall
endeavor to respond to the
queries within the period
specified in Clause
11.(February 9, 2106)
The response of State
Government for queries
raised by registered bidders
up to February 5, 2016
should be provided &
discussed in Pre Bid
conference on February 6,
2016. This will save the
valuable time of all and
avoid repetition of same
query in the meeting. Any
additional clarification
required by the bidder on
State Government‟s
Response to query may be
asked through supplementary
query in the meeting itself.
All the responses to the queries shall be
published as per the schedule of bidding
process.
8. Tender
Document
Clause 10.3
The State Government and the
Successful Bidder shall enter
into the MDPA upon the
Successful Bidder having
obtained all consents,
approvals, permits, no-
objections and the like as may
be required under Applicable
Law for commencement of
Few clearances/permission
for commencement of
mining operations can be
obtained only after the
execution of Mining Lease
e.g. DGMS permissions.
Further, pursuant to the
tender document, MDPA is
predecessor to the mining
lease. Hence, it will not be
The clause 10.3 to be
suitably amended.
Any such clearances/permissions, which can
only be obtained after the execution of mining
lease, shall be exempted.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
mining operations. possible for the Successful
bidder to obtain all consents,
approvals, permits, no-
objections for
commencement of mining
operation before MDPA, as
required under this clause.
9. Tender
Document
Clause 10.4
Subsequent to execution of
the MDPA, the Successful
Bidder shall pay the third
installment of the Upfront
Payment. Upon such payment,
the State Government shall
grant a mining lease to the
Successful Bidder. The
mining lease shall be executed
between the Successful Bidder
and the State Government
within a period of 30 days
from the date of payment and
shall be subject to the
provisions of the Act and the
Rules made there under. The
date of the commencement of
the period for which a mining
lease is granted shall be the
date on which a mining lease
is executed.
Bidder should pay all costs
related to stamp duty,
registration of the mining
lease and other statutory
charges.
Please clarify whether Stamp
Duty shall be chargeable
only on amount of Royalty
and not on Final Price Offer.
Stamp duty shall be applicable as per the
relevant law.
10. Tender
Document
Clause 12
Time Table – Stage II
4. Mine Development
Production Agreement
(MDPA) to be executed
Please clarify:
1. What will happen if the
Preferred Bidder fails to
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
between State Government &
Successful Bidder upon
obtaining all consents,
approvals, permits, no
objections from various
Government agencies/
departments required under
applicable laws for
commencement of mining
operations
meet all prerequisites before
the said date?
2. What will happen If
obtaining all consent ,
approvals gets delayed from
due date because of reasons
beyond the control of
Bidder.
The Government will examine the application
submitted by the successful bidder, stating the
reasons for delay in submission of the required
clearances from the competent authorities, and
will take actions as per the applicable law.
11. Tender
Document
Clause 15.1
The Bidder shall furnish as
part of its Technical Bid, a
security in the form of a bank
guarantee payable at
Hyderabad by a Scheduled
Bank as listed in the Second
Schedule of the Reserve Bank
of India Act, 1934.
Format of Bid Security
provided in Part C of
Schedule I has no provision
to mention that the bank
guarantee is payable at
Hyderabad.
The format should be
suitably amended.
The format of bid security has been suitably
amended as per Corrigendum # 14.
12. Tender
Document
Schedule I
Part B (1)(c) The corporate authorization of
the authorized signatory of the
Bidder (which is a company)
must be enclosed with the bid
letter. It is recommended that
the Bidder may authorize one
person to deal with all matters
related to bid. However, if the
Bidder has authorized more
than one person, then the
corporate authorization of all
such persons should be
enclosed. Any change in such
corporate authorization must
be immediately intimated to
the State Government.
Please clarify:
1. Is the Corporate
Authorization required in
addition to the Power of
Attorney?
2. Who should issue the
corporate authorization?
3. Is there any specific
format for such
authorization?
1) Corporate authorization is required, in
addition to power of attorney.
2) Corporate authorization letter is to be
issued by Board of Directors (or) the person
authorized by Board of Directors to do so
specifically for this purpose.
3) The bidder may use an appropriate format
for corporate authorization.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
13. Tender
Document
Schedule I
Part B (1)(d) (iii) Documents to evidence the
requirements of minerals for
the specified end-use.
What Kind of Documents are
Required for this Clause? Kindly refer to Schedule I, Section A (g) of
the tender document.
14. Tender
Document
Schedule I
Part C
Format of Bid Security
Bid Security should be
addressed to specific
Authority of the State
Government. In the present
format it has been addressed
to none.
As per Corrigendum # 14, Bid security to be
addressed to -
Directorate of Mines & Geology
8th Floor, BRKR Bhavan,
Saifabad, Hyderabad 500 063
15. Tender
Document
Schedule I
Part E.
Affidavit
(a) The affidavit must be
executed in India in
accordance with Applicable
Law and it must be in issued
in accordance with the
constitutional documents of
the Bidder after obtaining all
corporate approvals as may be
required. The extract of
constitutional documents and
certified copies of the
corporate approvals must be
enclosed with the power of
attorney.
Does constitutional
document and corporate
approval is also required
separately for Affidavit?
Constitutional document and corporate
approval is also required separately for
Affidavit.
16. Tender
Document
Schedule I
Part F
Format of letter on existing
clinker/ cement plant(s)
We have enclosed the
Certificate of Incorporation of
the above mentioned End Use
Plants.
Certificate of Incorporation
is issued for a company and
is not plant specific.
Please clarify what
certificate is required to be
submitted under this clause?
As per Corrigendum # 14, Certificate of
Incorporation or corresponding ownership
documents of the EUPs to be provided.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
17. Tender
Document
Schedule III
3 a. (ii)(j)
A certificate from bidder
regarding its entire limestone
requirement at rated capacity
utilization.
Is this certificate is required
for proposed plant for this
auction Block only or it is
for all the proposed/existing
Plants in Andhra
Pradesh/India?
Certificate is required only for the proposed
plant for the corresponding block.
18. Tender
Document
Schedule III
3 b. b.
The Qualified Bidder shall
have to put its Final Price
Offer over and above the
displayed highest bid by a
minimum increment of 0.05%
to become the highest
Qualified - Bidder.
Whether increment has to be
in multiples of 0.05% or any
value equal to or more than
0.05% will be accepted?
Any value equal to or more than 0.05% will be
accepted.
19.
Mine
Development
and
Production
Agreement
Clause 1.1.6
“Eligibility Condition” shall
mean the eligibility conditions
specified in the Act and Rules
including all the eligibility
conditions listed in Clause [6]
of tender document.
Clause [6] of tender
document deals with
„Review Period and Site
Visit‟ not with “Eligibility
Condition”
A clarification has been issued in corrigendum
# 14 regarding the same.
“Eligibility Condition” shall mean the
eligibility conditions specified in the Act and
Rules including all the eligibility conditions
listed in Clause [5] of tender document.
20.
Mine
Development
and
Production
Agreement
Clause 6.2 & Schedule C
(Particulars of end use
Plant)
“The Lease area has been
reserved for Clinker &
Cement Production and the
successful bidder has qualified
for the electronic auction on
the basis of its representation
that all minerals extracted
under the Mining Lease shall:
(i) Utilized solely for the
specified end use; and
(ii) Not to be sold or
transferred or otherwise
Tender Document does
specify any condition
regarding establishment of
end use plant in Andhra
Pradesh
1. Is it allowed to put
Clinker/Cement Plant
outside the state of Andhra
Pradesh?
2. If the Bidder establishes
only clinkerisation unit in
Andhra Pradesh and
Grinding Unit in any other
state, will that be allowed?
1. As per clause 5 of the tender document,
clinker/cement plant is to be located in the
state of Andhra Pradesh.
2. Establishment of only clinkerisation unit in
Andhra Pradesh fulfils the “Specified end use”
clause, and therefore, allowed.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
disposed, either directly or
indirectly.
21.
Mine
Development
and
Production
Agreement
Clause 7.1.1 & Schedule D
The Successful Bidder shall
make monthly payments on
the basis of the Final Price
Offer (the “Monthly
Payment”). The Monthly
Payment shall be computed
on the basis of the Value of
Mineral Dispatched or the
value of the minimum
production requirement as
specified in Clause 8, whichever is higher.
Is penalty of 24% of average
Sale price as per schedule C
on Shortfall in minimum
required production is in
addition to payment made
under Clause 7.1.1?
When the Bidder is already
bound for monthly payment
for minimum production
requirement whether the
mineral dispatched or not
under Clause 7.1.1,
penalizing by charging 24 %
of average Sale price on
shortfall production as per
Schedule D is not justifiable.
More over the minimum
production requirement is on
the annual basis as per
Clause 8 & Schedule D, it is
not on monthly basis. Hence
shortfall can be calculated on
yearly basis not on monthly.
Tender conditions prevail
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
22.
Mine
Development
and
Production
Agreement
Clause 7.1.3
The Monthly Payment is
required to be made within 20
calendar days of expiry of
each month with respect to
Mineral extracted from the
Lease Area in such calendar
month.
Monthly Payment is required
to be made with respect to
mineral extracted or mineral
dispatched?
Except in clause 7.1.3, the
monthly payment has to be
made with respect to mineral
dispatched. Please clarify.
A clarification issued in corrigendum # 14
regarding the same.
Monthly payments to be computed on the
basis of value of mineral dispatched.
23.
Mine
Development
and
Production
Agreement
Clause No. 8.3 (Minimum
Production Requirement)
“In case where non
compliance with minimum
production requirement
exceeds more than seven
instances, such non-
compliance shall give the state
government a right to
terminate the Mining Lease.”
This Clause should be
terminated as there cannot be
two punishments against one
offence.
The Successful bidder is
already bound by means of
appropriation of
Performance Security
through Schedule D of
MDPA in which penalty is
fixed in case of not
fulfilling minimum
production requirement.
Tender condition prevails.
24.
Mine
Development
and
Production
Agreement
SCHEDULE C -
PARTICULARS OF THE
END USE PLANT
Can mineral be used in any
other plant of specified end
use than those mentioned in
the Schedule C of the Mine
Development and Production
Agreement (MDPA)
Particulars of End Use Plant
may be revised/ modified on
a later date.
Mineral to be used only in the specified End-
use Plant.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
25.
Mine
Development
and
Production
Agreement
SCHEDULE D – MINIMUM
PRODUCTION
REQUIREMENT
The Successful Bidder shall
meet the annual Minimum
Production Requirement as
stated in the
table below:
Minimum production
requirement given in
Schedule D is certain
percentage of yearly
production as per Mining
Plan. This means that the
Preferred Bidder can prepare
mine plan according to its
plant requirement and get it
approved. Minimum
production requirement will
be certain percentage (as
mentioned in Schedule D) of
yearly production committed
in the approved mine plan.
Further, if mine plan is
revised in future for
increasing or decreasing the
production, the minimum
production requirement will
be corresponding to the
revised mine plan. Please
clarify on these
understanding.
The Government may consider the issue on a
case to case basis, depending upon the
circumstances.
26.
Mine
Development
and
Production
Agreement
Schedule D(Minimum
Production Requirement)
Year Minimum
Production
Requirement
(% of yearly
production
as per
Mining Plan)
I 0%
II 0%
Year Minimum
Production
Requirement (%
of yearly
production as
per Mining
Plan)
I to V 0% (for Land
Acquisition)
VI to
VIII
0% (For Plant
Commissioning)
As per past experience of
Industries minimum 5 years
period are required for
Land Acquisition for Mines
and Plant and further 3
years are required for
Commissioning of Plant.
Tender conditions prevail
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
III 50%
IV 60%
V 70%
VI
onwards
70%
IX 25%
X
onward
s
50%
27.
Tender
Document &
Summary of
Mineral
Block
(Pillutla
Piduguralla
Block)
Slab Stone quarry are in
operation in the Block.
Whether they are authorized
or not?
If they are authorized then
will State Government
evacuate them before
granting Mining Lease?
The extent area of the block doesn‟t include
the slab stone quarries. All the authorized
quarries have been deleted from the block
extents.
28.
Summary of
Mineral
Block
(Pillutla
Piduguralla
Block)
Part C Para 5
There is a Granted Mining
Lease in Survey no.479/18
(155 Acres) of Konaki
Village, Pidugurala Mandal.
Does this survey no. is
included in the Block to be
auctioned?
All the authorized quarries have been deleted
from the block extents.
29.
Summary of
Mineral
Block
(Pillutla
Piduguralla
Block)
Para 3
Only G3 level exploration
has been carried out in the
Block.
1. How a Mining Plan can be
prepared on this level of
exploration as minimum
exploration requirement for
preparation of Mining Plan is
G2 level exploration?
2. Have IBM has been
consent to approve the
Mining Plan on G3 Level
1) The GoI vide Lr No. 7/56/2015-MIV
accorded permission to treat the exploration
on far with G2 level.
2) The Government may consider the request
of the preferred bidder to undertake additional
drilling to generate adequate data for
preparation of mine plan.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
exploration?
30. Tender
Document
Clause 1.8- “The issue of this
Tender Document does not
imply that the State
Government is bound to select
a Bidder or to appoint the
Preferred Bidder as Successful
Bidder for the limestone block
and the State Government
reserves the right to reject all
or any of the Bidders or bids
without assigning any reason
whatsoever.”
The issue of this Tender
Document does not imply
that the State Government is
bound to select a Bidder or
to appoint the Preferred
Bidder as Successful Bidder
for the mineral block and the
State Government reserves
the right to reject all or any
of the Bidders (except the
Successful Bidder ) or bids
without assigning any reason
whatsoever
Provided that if the bid is
rejected without assigning
any reason, no amount shall
be appropriated by the State
Government. Such amount
will be refunded to the
Bidder within 30 days from
the date of rejection of bid.
Provided also that if the bid
is rejected without assigning
any reason, the Bidder will
not be disqualified from
bidding for any e-auction or
allotment conducted by the
State Government in the
future.
Provided that if the Bidder is
The rationale behind this
amendment is, a Preferred
Bidder will be considered
as a Successful Bidder upon
fulfilment of the following:
Continuing in
compliance with all
the terms and
conditions of
eligibility,
Payment of second
instalment of Upfront
Payment
Furnishing an
irrevocable and
unconditional
performance security
Satisfying the
conditions specified in
clause (b) of sub-
Section (2) of Section
5of the Act with
respect to a mining
plan
So, a Successful Bidder‟s
bid should not be rejected.
A Preferred Bidder should
be provided an opportunity
of being heard prior to
rejection of bid, as
payments/ instalments
Tender condition prevails
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
a Preferred Bidder, he shall
be given an opportunity of
being heard in case of
rejection of his bid.
made till that time as per
the provisions of the Tender
Document by Preferred
Bidder may be
appropriated. Thus, the
clause is a substantial
financial risk for the
Bidder.
Hence to maintain the
natural justice, right of
personal hearing should be
given to Bidder.
Such an amendment will
avoid the disputes as
reasons stated during
rejections would be final
and not challengeable.
31. Tender
Document
Clause 4(iii) – About 20% of
the total Mineral Block area
has been earmarked for allied
activities viz. creation of
infrastructure
1) Please clarify what does
infrastructure implies and
whether any specific
location in block has been
identified for the same.
Please confirm that this area
comprise of non mineral
land.
2) If this area forms part of the
mining lease, Please
provide the rationale for
identifying & earmarking
such area as part of mineral
block.
About 20% of the total
Mineral Block area, which is
non mineral bearing land,
has been earmarked for
allied activities viz. creation
of infrastructure
To understand the purpose
of this area earmarked for
infrastructure and
accordingly clarification
should be made in the
clause. The mineral being
precious natural
commodity, it should be
utilised fully, such limit
should not impact it
adversely.
Additional 20% area has been added to
mineral blocks for any allied infrastructure
related to mining activity only. The additional
area is unexplored and hasn‟t been considered
in resources computation. This area is clearly
demarcated and shown in the sketches
appended to Geological Report.
Creation of infrastructure doesn‟t include
setting up of cement plant.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
3) Whether creation of
infrastructure include
setting up of cement plant.
32. Tender
Document
Clause 14.7.2- State
Government reserves the right
to reject any bid and
appropriate the entire Bid
Security if:
a. ….
b. ….
c. ….
Clause 14.7.2- State
Government reserves the
right to reject any bid and
appropriate the entire Bid
Security if:
a. ….
b. ….
c. ….
Bid Security for the reasons
stated above shall be
appropriated through written
intimation to the Bidder and
after giving an opportunity to
be heard before taking action
under clause 14.7.3.
As per clause 14.7.3. and
14.7.4, State government
shall forfeit and appropriate
the Bid Security or
Performance Security and
disqualify the Bidder for
next 5 years. The forfeiture
of Bidders security amount
and its disqualification
should be informed in
writing in advance and an
opportunity must be
provided before to take
such stringent action as it
will stop the bidder from
enjoying its right to do free
business.
Tender condition prevails
33. Tender
Document
Schedule – I (B)(1)(c)– Bid
Letter
The corporate authorisation of
the authorised signatory of the
Bidder (which is a company)
must be enclosed with the bid
letter. It is recommended that
the Bidder may authorise one
person to deal with all matter
related to bid. However, if the
Bidder has authorised more
The provision suggest that
Bidder may choose to
authorise more than one
person to deal with all the
bid related matters.
Given that this being e-
auction through MSTC
platform where Bidder can
The provision need clarity
on how multiple authorised
person will deal with the
bid.
The bidder may provide power of attorney in
favor of more than one person.
There shall only be one authorized person for
all MSTC related matters. However, there can
be more authorized persons for other bid
related matters.
In extreme case of requirement for
replacement of authorized representative
holding Digital Signature Certificate, the
bidder may approach Government of Andhra
Pradesh and submit application for requesting
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
than one person, then the
corporate authorisation of all
such persons should be
enclosed. Any change in such
corporate authorisation must
be immediately intimated to
the State Government.”
only submit bid and deal
with other matters relating to
bid after logging on the
MSTC website using Digital
Signature Certificate, how
more than one authorised
signatory are expected to
deal with the process.
Further during the bid
process, if Bidder desires or
is required to change the
Authorised representative
holding digital signature,
will the same be allowed.
Can Bidder continue with the
bid using same purchased
documents and MMTC
allow transfer of such
documents to new
DSC/replace DSC in their
record.
Can Bidder submit Power of
Attorney in favour of more
than one person authorising
him to deal with bid matters.
such changes with valid reasons along with
Power of Attorney in favour of the new
authorized person. Government of Andhra
Pradesh on its satisfaction may provide
approval and may instruct MSTC accordingly.
34. Tender
Document
Schedule – I (B)(2)(17) – “We
agree and understand that the
Bid is subject to the
provisions of the Tender
Document. In no case, we
shall have any claim or right
whatsoever nature if the
mining lease is not awarded to
To delete “our bid is not
opened”.
The Bid process should be
fair and transparent and
State Government should
open all bids in order to
take a rational decision. Not
opening of all bids will be
considered as a part of the
process but not opening of
Tender condition prevails.
Bid is opened only in case of technically
qualified bidders.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
us or our bid is not opened or
rejected”.
only our bid / or any other
bid will be considered as
breach of principles of
natural justice.
35. Tender
Document Schedule to be added
Kindly provide the content
and format of the Letter of
Intent to be issued to
Successful Bidder.
The information will help
the Bidder in better
understanding of the
obligations on the
Preferred Bidder.
Letter of intent is a formal Government
correspondence and shall only be issued to the
preferred bidder.
36. Tender
Document Clause to be added
Kindly provide the details
regarding role of the
Government in facilitating
the Land Acquisition and
R&R activities.
Kindly mention if any
timeline related to Land
Acquisition and R&R
activities has to be followed
by the Successful Bidder
The Tender Document
does not specify any details
regarding Land Acquisition
and R&R. The additional
information will help the
bidders in formulating
effective strategy for
arranging Land that are
mentioned in the Tender
Document. This being
critical for time bound start
of Mining Operations
State Government needs to
play a proactive role to
ensure the blocks up for
auction do not face any
issues in obtaining
approvals and clearance.
State Government should
also assist Successful
Bidder in acquisition of
land for end-use plant and
getting related approvals
and clearances.
Acquisition of third party land shall take place
as per Clause-2 of Part-VIII of Model Form of
Mining Lease (Form-K) appended to MC
Rules, 1960.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
37. Tender
Document Clause to be added
Kindly clarify whether
mining rights over the
Government Land be
automatically transferred to
the Successful Bidder after
issuance of LoI or upon the
execution and registration of
mining lease.
The additional information
will help the Bidders in
formulating effective
strategy for obtaining
various clearances/
approvals that are
mentioned in the Tender
Document.
Mining rights shall be transferred as per the
provisions of MC Rules, 1960 and G.O. Ms.
No. 2 Revenue (Assignments-I) Dept., dt.02-
01-2013.
38. Tender
Document Schedule IV (MDPA)
The word “Person” has been
used in the agreement
multiple times however the
same has not been defined.
To clarify what includes
“Person”.
Person is a natural or artificial legal entity and
its meaning is as per the context within the
sentence.
39. Tender
Document
Schedule IV (4.2.1) – Events
for appropriation of the
Performance Security
The Performance Security
may be appropriated by the
State Government upon
occurrence of any events
specified in table 4.3.1 (the
“Appropriation Event”), to be
determined by the State
Government in its sole
discretion. In case the
Performance Security is in
form of a bank guarantee, the
State Government may invoke
the same on an Appropriation
Event.
The Performance Security
may be appropriated by the
State Government upon
occurrence of any events
specified in table 4.3.1 (the
“Appropriation Event”), to
be determined by the State
Government in its sole
discretion and after the
Successful Bidder has failed
to rectify the Appropriation
Event. In case the
Performance Security is in
form of a bank guarantee, the
State Government may
invoke the same on failure to
rectify an Appropriation
Event.
The Successful Bidder
should first get an
opportunity to rectify the
Appropriation Event as
also mentioned in clause
4.3.2 and in case of failure
the Performance Security
should be appropriated.
Before appropriation the
Successful Bidder should
get one opportunity to
remedy the default.
Tender condition prevails.
40. Tender
Document
Schedule IV (4.3.2) – In the
event of a part or total
appropriation of the
Performance Security, the
“In the event the Successful
Bidder fails to rectify the
Appropriation Event as
provided under clause 4.2.1,
The need for top up of
bank guarantee shall arise
only when the Performance
Security is appropriated in
Tender condition prevails.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
Successful Bidder shall be
required to (i) rectify the
Appropriation Event and (ii)
top up the bank guarantee
constituting the Performance
Security or deposit additional
amount towards security
deposit within seven days if
receipt of notice under clause
4.3.1
the State Government shall
appropriate the Performance
Security in part or in full and
the Successful Bidder shall
top up the bank guarantee
constituting the Performance
Security or deposit
additional amount towards
security deposit within seven
days of receipt of notice
under clause”.
the event Successful
Bidder fails to rectify the
Appropriation Event.
Therefore appropriation
should be done only after
the Successful Bidder fails
to rectify.
41. Tender
Document
Schedule IV (4.3.3) – Any one
or more Appropriation Events
resulting in appropriation of
the entire Performance
Security shall give the State
Government a right to
determine the mining lease
without prejudice to any other
proceeding to be taken against
the mining lease holder.
Any one or more
Appropriation Events
resulting in appropriation of
the entire Performance
Security shall give the State
Government a right to
determine the mining lease
without prejudice to any
other proceeding to be taken
against the mining lease
holder only after the
Successful Bidder has got an
opportunity to rectify the
Appropriation Event.
The Successful Bidder
should first get an
opportunity to rectify the
Appropriation Event and in
case of failure the
Performance Security
should be appropriated.
Before appropriation the
Successful Bidder should
get one opportunity to
remedy the default.
Tender condition prevails.
42. Tender
Document
Schedule IV Clause 8.1- “The
conduct of mining operations
at the Lease Area shall be
subject to the milestones listed
in SCHEDULE D with
respect to production (the
“Production requirement”)
and the minimum annual
production to be achieved
Kindly relax the provisions
regarding Minimum Annual
Production mentioned in the
Tender Document. The
Minimum Annual
Requirement should not be
more than 50% of the yearly
production of mine plan.
Moreover, the Bidder should
be allowed to make-up for
The Minimum Production
Requirement provided in
Schedule D of the Tender
Document as percentage of
Mining plan should be
restricted to 50% from year 4
onwards.
The mineable reserves and
annual production quantity
will be governed after
having proper assessment
of Resource, various
surface constraints, Quality
which will get reflected in
formulation of mining plan
Since the quantity of
Tender condition prevails.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
every year.” the shortfall in production in
preceding years and the
penalty against such set-off
by production make-up
should be refunded to the
Successful Bidder.
Limestone produced will
be dependent on the
requirement of End Use
Plant, we request you to
relax the provisions
regarding Minimum
Production mentioned in
the Tender Document and
to link the Minimum
Production Requirement to
the requirement of End Use
Plant.
The mineral requirement of
End Use Plant i.e. Cement
Plant for limestone is
dependent on the demand
of end product which again
is cyclic and driven by
market dynamics.
Therefore, Minimum
Required Production
should be restricted to 50%
of mining plan quantity.
43. Tender
Document
Clause 8.3 of the Schedule IV:
“Any non-compliance with
the Production Requirement
would result in appropriation
of the Performance Security in
the manner stipulated in
Clause 4 and in case where
such non-compliance exceeds
for more than seven instances,
Any non-compliance with
the Production Requirement
should be adjusted in the
Production Requirement of
the succeeding year failing
which the Performance
Security shall be
appropriated in the manner
stipulated in Clause 4 and in
Any opportunity should be
given to the Successful
Bidder to meet the
Minimum Production
Requirement before
appropriation of the
Performance Security as
the rate of appropriation is
too high.
Tender condition prevails.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
such non-compliance shall
give the State Government a
right to determine the mining
lease without prejudice to any
other proceeding to be taken
against the mining lease
holder.”
case where such non-
compliance exceeds for more
than seven instances, such
non-compliance shall give
the State Government a right
to determine the mining
lease without prejudice to
any other proceeding to be
taken against the mining
lease holder.
44. Tender
Document
Clause 11.2 of Schedule IV:
“None of the representations,
warranties and/or statements
contained in this Agreement
shall be treated as qualified by
any actual or constructive
knowledge on the part of the
State Government or the
Central Government or any of
its respective agents,
representatives, officers,
employees or advisers.”
To delete the clause
The representations given
without any actual or
constructive knowledge
will be of no use and such
a clause will be considered
as arbitrary.
Tender condition prevails.
45. Tender
Document
Clause 3 (e)- Schedule E-
Mine Development and
Production Agreement: “there
are no actions, suits,
proceedings or investigations
pending or to the Successful
Bidder‟s knowledge
threatened against it at law or
in equity before any court or
before any other judicial,
quasi-judicial or other
Event of Default is not
defined. Kindly provide
which are the events would
be considered as Default
Events under Mine
Development and Production
agreement.
Further, the participating
companies are large
corporate houses and have
various business activities
Clause 3 (e) can be revised
as follows: “the actions,
suits, proceedings or
investigations pending to the
Successful Bidder‟s
knowledge before any court
or before any other judicial,
quasi-judicial or other
authority will not prejudice
or threaten the Successful
There may be certain minor
cases against Bidders in the
ordinary course of business
that may not have any
material impact on this
process. Therefore only
those cases that may have a
material impact should be
covered under this clause.
The participating
companies are large
Tender condition prevails.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
authority, the outcome of
which may constitute an event
of default hereunder;”
and interests on which legal
cases might be on. Hence
only such event which
threatens Bidder‟s ability to
execute this specific project
should be considered as
Event of Default and no
other legal process,
judgement etc.
Bidder‟s ability to execute
this specific project”
corporate houses and have
various business activities
and interests on which
legal cases might be there.
Hence the suggested text
for amendment.
46. Tender
Document
Clause 3(g) – Schedule E –
“the Successful Bidder has
complied with Applicable
Law and has not been subject
to any fines, penalties,
injunctive relief or any other
civil or criminal liabilities”.
Except for any fines and
penalties imposed on the
Successful Bidder during the
ordinary course of business,
the Successful Bidder has
complied with Applicable
Law and has not been
subject to any other fines,
penalties, injunctive relief or
any other civil or criminal
liabilities which may
constitute an event of default
hereunder;”
Only such cases which
have a material impact on
this agreement shall be
included in this
representation. During the
ordinary course of course
of business there may be
fines and penalties imposed
on the bidder which may
not be of relevance for the
purpose of this agreement.
Tender condition prevails.
47. Tender
Document
Clause 5.4- A bidder shall
disclose all mining leases for
limestone held in the state of
Andhra Pradesh along with
the mineral reserves available
in the said leases as on the
date of the NIT and shall not
be in arrears of mineral
revenue to the state
government.
a. Arrears of mineral
revenue should be clearly
defined.
b. This clause should be
properly articulated and only
in case of undisputed arrears
for more than 12 months
should be considered for
disqualifying a bidder to
participate in the bidding
process
c. Format in which the
said information to be given
The information will help
the Bidder in better
understanding of the tender
document.
Mineral Revenue includes payments to be paid
by the lease holders towards Annual Dead
Rent, Royalties, Interest dues, Surface Rents,
Cess on Surface Rents and penalties imposed
by the Mines Departments for unauthorized
mining / quarrying, illegal transportation etc.
The bidder may chose an appropriate format to
disclose mining leases for limestone held in
the state of Andhra Pradesh along with the
mineral reserves available in the said leases.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
should be provided
48. Tender
Document
Clause 1 of Schedule III- xiv
i.e. A certificate from the
bidder regarding its entire
limestone requirements at
rated capacity utilization.
Please clarify the meaning of
rated capacity utilization and
also the format of certificate
The information will help
the Bidder in better
understanding of the tender
document.
Rated capacity means nameplate capacity or
installed capacity.
The bidder may chose an appropriate format
of the certificate.
49. Tender
Document
Clause 1 of Schedule III- xv
i.e. A declaration on all
mining leases for limestone
held in the state of Andhra
Pradesh along with the
mineral reserves available in
the said leases as on the date
of the NIT.
Please provide the specific
format to be used.
The information will help
the Bidder in better
understanding of the tender
document.
The bidder may chose an appropriate format
to disclose mining leases for limestone held in
the state of Andhra Pradesh along with the
mineral reserves available in the said leases.
50. Tender
Document
Clause 5 Explanation:- With
respect to one limestone
block, only one Bid may be
submitted, either directly or
indirectly by a Bidder or any
of its Group Companies.
The definition of Bidder,
Affiliate and Group
Company read along with
other qualification provisions
suggest that these definitions
only covers Affiliates but not
subsidiary.
Kindly clarify will the bids
by two companies having
Parent-Subsidiary
relationship is allowed?
Also clarify, if separate Bids
are submitted by the Bidder
and its Group Companies,
whether all the Bids will be
rejected by the State
Government or Bid
submitted only by one
Bidder will be considered for
The information will help
the Bidder in better
understanding of the tender
document.
Two companies having Parent-Subsidiary
relationship are not allowed to bid for the
same block.
If separate Bids are submitted by the Bidder
and its Group Companies, all the bids will be
rejected by the State Government.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
evaluation
51. Tender
Document
Clause 2.2- “Affiliates” with
respect to a Company, means
a Company in which that
other Company has a
significant influence, but
which is not a subsidiary
Company of the Company
having such influence and
includes a Joint Venture
Company. For the purposes of
this clause, "significant
influence" means control of at
least twenty per cent of total
share capital, or of business
decisions under an agreement.
This definition read along
with definition of Group
Company and other
provisions of the tender
document does not allow
companies which fall under
the definition of Affiliate to
put two separate bids for the
same tender. However,
subsidiaries (as per
Companies Act 2013) are
specifically excluded from
this definition.
Kindly clarify following:
1) The current definition
of Affiliate suggest that if a
Company have 20% or more
share capital in other
company than two will be
considered Affiliate. In case
two companies having
common control or
shareholding of more than
20%, will such companies be
considered as Affiliate?
Example: Company A have
25% shareholding in
Company B and 30%
shareholding in Company C.
By current definition,
Company A and B are
The clarification is
necessary to understand the
eligibility of companies to
participate. The spirit of
competitive bidding suggest
that there should be only
one bid by one Party
directly or indirectly. In
case of Coal auctions,
multiple bids from same
company were allowed
however for evaluating and
ranking purpose, all such
bids were given same rank.
Hence clarify bidding
structures allowed in detail.
Please refer Clause 2.2 & 2.11.
Tender Condition Prevails.
As regards to the clarification requested:
1) B&C will not be considered as Affiliates.
2) No, In case of Common shareholding of
more than 20% through multiple layers/
holding companies, such companies will not
be considered as Affiliate.
(as per section 186 of Companies Act, 2013)
3) Yes, a Parent and Subsidiary company will
not be allowed to bid for the same block.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
affiliate and Company A and
C are affiliate but Company
B and C are not affiliate by
this definition as there is no
shareholding of B in C or
vice versa. Kindly confirm if
our understanding is correct
or B and C would be
considered Affiliate.
2) In case of Common
shareholding of more than
20% through multiple
layers/holding companies,
will such companies be
considered as Affiliate?
3) The provisions are
silent on the treatment of bid
by both Parent Company as
well as Subsidiary Company.
Will a Parent and Subsidiary
company be allowed to bid
for the same block as
definition of Affiliate and
Group Company read with
qualification suggest that.
52. Tender
Document
Schedule III 3. Preparation
and Submission of Bid (b)
Stage 2: Electronic Auction-
Final price Offer- ........
During the process of
electronic auction, the Bidder
shall be required to sign their
We understand that the
Bidder is required to inform
the State Government in case
there is any change in the
corporate authorisation of
the Bidder. In such case, the
process to be followed by the
Bidder needs to be provided
Schedule III Clause 3
b. Stage 2: electronic
auction- Final Price Offer
b. Conduct of e-auction
During the process of
electronic auction, the
Since the Tender
Document states that any
change in corporate
authorisation must be
immediately intimated to
the State Government, the
details regarding steps to
be followed by Bidders for
In extreme case of requirement for
replacement of authorized representative, the
bidder may approach Government of Andhra
Pradesh and submit application for requesting
such changes with valid reasons along with
Power of Attorney in favour of the new
authorized person. Government of Andhra
Pradesh on its satisfaction may provide
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
bids with their respective
digital signature certificate
(DSC) and the use of which
has been duly authorised on
behalf of the Bidder and
which was used at the time of
registration. Any digital
signature certificate other than
the above shall not be
acceptable for bid submission
by the system.
in detail.
Moreover, the Bidder should
also be allowed to the
change the DSC for
submission of bid in case
there is any change in the
corporate authorisation or
authorised signatory prior to
submission of bid.
Bidder shall be required
tosign their bids with their
respective digital signature
certificate (DSC)and the use
of which has been duly
authorised on behalf of the
Bidderand which was used at
the time ofregistration.
However, in case of change
of Authorised Signatory of
the Bidder, the Bidder will
be allowed to apply for
change the DSC for
submission of bid after prior
intimation to the State
Government.
intimating change in
corporate authorisation are
required for clear
understanding of the
process.
approval and may instruct MSTC accordingly.
53. Tender
Document NA
Basis for calculation of
reserve price should be
shared with the bidders to
ensure transparency.
Realistic estimation of
resources specific to the end
use and representative prices
should be considered in
estimation of reserve price.
The information will help
the Bidder in better
understanding of the tender
document.
Not required.
54. Tender
Document NA
State Government should
provide the amount of stamp
duty payable on the Mining
Lease to avoid any disputes
at later date and get best
offer.
Further it should be clarified
that for calculation of Stamp
Duty on Mining Lease
Clarity on applicable stamp
duty on the blocks and on
other agreements should be
provided for better
evaluation of the
opportunity by bidders.
Cost for stamp duty and
registration of mining lease
based on prevailing
applicable law in the State
Stamp duty shall be applicable as per the
relevant law.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
whether 50 years (which is
maximum duration of
mining lease) or actual
operational life of mine be
considered?
should be specifically
mentioned in the tender
document. States should
also quantify the stamp
duty, if any, applicable on
MDPA
55. Tender
Document
Clause 10.2 (c)
Pursuant to sub-rule (1) of
rule 12 of the Auction Rules,
the Performance Security shall
be adjusted every five years so
that it continues to correspond
to 0.5% of the reassessed
Value of Estimated Resources
determined in accordance with
the Auction Rules.
Kindly provide the detailed
methodology for
Performance Security
adjustment. In case of any
change in the methodology
of price determination by
IBM, how and when will the
adjustment in Performance
Security take effect.
Methodology for revision of
performance security should
be provided in detail for
better clarity. Provision of
yearly revision of
performance security should
be incorporated.
Performance Security
amount may vary based on
various factors including
following:
Updated mineral
resource base
(considering
additional information
and mining activities)
Price of mineral (IBM
prices)
Valuation principles
Mining plan and
approved capacity
Market conditions
Hence a clarification will
help avoid disputes at later
stage.
The clause 10.2 (c) is self-explanatory.
56. Tender
Document NA
Methodology for adjustment
of Upfront Payment should
be provided in detail for
better clarity. No monthly
payment should be paid by
Successful Bidder till the
entire Upfront Payment has
been adjusted.
The information will help
the Bidder in better
understanding of the tender
document.
The upfront payment will be adjusted in
accordance to the quantity of mineral
dispatched during the first 60 months against
the amount payable in accordance with the
percentage of Value of Mineral Dispatched
quoted as the Final Price Offer.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
57. Tender
Document NA
The land purchase in the area
of mineral block should not
be allowed from the NIT
date till the auction process
is over.
The tender should protect the
Preferred / Successful
bidders against any
accumulation of land by
third party after Notice
Inviting Tender is issued
Since the blocks have been
notified and Successful
Bidder is required to
acquire land, people may
buy land in the area and
make land acquisition
difficult and expensive for
the Successful Bidder.
Regarding purchase of lands, the Preferred
Bidder may take up separately with the
concerned/appropriate department of the
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure
Corporation (APIIC) may assist the preferred
bidder in land acquisition.
58. Tender
Document
Appropriations of BG in
case of actual production is
less than minimum
production is double penalty
(Bid Price on Minimum
Production and 24% of IBM
Price as Penalty on Shortfall
in Production) and need to
be revised.
The obligation of the
bidder should be limited to
Minimum Production.
Tender condition prevails
59. Tender
Document
Clause 3.5: “Pursuant to sub-
rule (3) and sub-rule (4) of
Rule 6 of the Mineral
(Auction) Rules, 2015, the
State Government reserves
this Mineral Block for
Specified End Use. The
minerals extracted under the
mining lease shall:
i. be utilised solely for the
Specified End Use; and
ii. Not be sold or transferred
or otherwise disposed of,
either directly or indirectly.”
While the bid document is
silent on the location of use
of the mineral, will mineral
be allowed to transport
outside state boundary.
The information will help
the Bidder in better
understanding of the tender
document.
Transport of mineral outside the state of
Andhra Pradesh is strictly prohibited.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
60. Tender
Document
Clause 14.1.1 (g)- A letter
mentioning the details of the
existing clinker/ cement
plant(s) in the format
specified in Part F of Schedule
I (Format of Letter) duly
signed by the signatory of the
bid
Kindly confirm that we need
to provide only details of the
existing clinker/cement
plants in the State of Andhra
Pradesh.
The information will help
the Bidder in better
understanding of the tender
document and compliance
during Bid Submission.
Details of the existing clinker/cement plants
only in the state of Andhra Pradesh are
required.
61. Tender
Document
Schedule I B. Bid Letter-
1(d)(iii)- Documents to
evidence the requirements of
minerals for the specified end-
use
Kindly state the particulars
of the documents required in
the clause.
The information will help
the Bidder in better
understanding of the tender
document.
Kindly refer to Schedule I, Section A (g) of
the tender document.
62. Tender
Document
Clause 1 of Schedule III-
……the bidder shall receive a
confirmation mail in the
registered e-mail address
advising the bidder to submit
the following documents to
the designated e-mail id only
which is given below.
i) ........
ii) ........
iii) ........
A particular user already
registered on MSTC website
and has submitted many of
the documents listed in the
clause during the process of
Registration. Request you to
please confirm / clarify
which of the documents out
of the documents mentioned
in point i. to xv are required
to be submitted by a bidder
already registered on MSTC.
The information will help
the Bidder in better
understanding of the tender
document.
All the documents mentioned in Clause 1 of
Schedule III are required to be submitted.
63. Tender
Document
Kindly provide the
methodology/ basis of the
sale price of mineral (grade-
wise and state-wise) as
published by IBM which
would be considered to
arrive at the value of
The rationale behind
having a separate policy for
determination of sale price
of limestone for captive
and commercial purpose
Not required.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
monthly dispatch.
We also suggest to have a
separate policy for
determination of sale price of
limestone published by IBM
for captive purpose and for
commercial purpose.
As per our understanding of
the market and IBM
methodology, current IBM
methodology take into
account both captive and
non-captive producer‟s
prices to arrive at notified
price of limestone. Given
skewed market condition for
limestone where over 95%
production is captive, current
price methodology does not
reflect fair market price.
Hence a provision should be
incorporated, to adjust the
bid percentage in case of
change in method of
publishing mineral/limestone
price by IBM to make
Bidder‟s revenue neutral.
This is must given that
Bidding Parameter is
dependent on IBM prices.
Further, kindly add a
provision to protect the
interest of Bidders from
potential risk in the event of
Change in Law including
change in taxation, royalty
etc. to make Bidder revenue
is:-
The IBM prices are based
on the average prices of top
ten non-captive producers
of the state. Applying these
prices on captive producers
may not be a correct
methodology for
determination of premium,
as the prices will be
fluctuating as per market
dynamics and will result in
a potential risk related to
project economics due to
large variation in prices,
which will be factored by
the Bidders and will reduce
the bid value considerably .
Therefore, IBM in
consultation with State
should develop a separate
methodology for
determination of prices for
captive users and publish
reference prices separately
for captive and non-captive
users. These prices should
be used for determination
of premium as per
Specified End Use.
As the bidding parameter is
directly related to the sale
price of mineral (grade-
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
neutral.
wise and state- wise) as
published by IBM for such
month of dispatch, there is
a substantial risk of End
Use Plant becoming
financially unviable at a
potential increased price
due to change in
methodology for
determination of sale price
of limestone by IBM and
thus should be considered
Change in Law. The
additional provisions will
protect the interest of
Bidders.
Further Bidder is
committing additional
royalty/bidding parameter
considering current mining
and taxation regime. Any
change which increases
cost to Bidder will make
project unviable and hence
such taxes should not be
applicable to Bidder.
64. Tender
Document
Clause 8.1- Pursuant to sub-
rule (4) of Rule 9 of the
Auction Rules, the e-auction
shall be an ascending forward
online electronic auction
conducted on electronic
platform created by MSTC
Limited (a Government of
In case two companies,
which are Group Companies,
submit bids for a limestone
block, then they should be
considered as one while
ranking for online e-auction.
f). If any Technically
Qualified Bidder which has
submitted a Rank Bid ( i.e.
Technically Qualified Bids
holding first fifty per cent of
the ranks (with any fraction
rounded off to higher
integer) or the top five
Technically Qualified Bids,
This is in line with the
methodology being
adopted in coal block
auctions.
Tender condition prevails.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
India enterprise) and shall
comprise of the following two
rounds:
A. First round of e-auction:
a) …
b) …
c) …
d) …
e) …
…( to be added)
whichever is higher), is a
Group Company of another
Technically Qualified Bidder
which has submitted a Rank
Bid; and/or any Technically
Qualified Bidder has
submitted more than one
Rank Bid, then, for the
purposes of assigning the
rank the following shall be
considered a single “Cluster”
and shall be assigned a
single rank.
65. Tender
Document
Point 2 & 3 of Clause 12-
Time Table- Stage II
Kindly clarify, the reason for
deviation of the State
Government from the
provisions of Mineral
(Auction) Rules, 2015
regarding the declaration of
Preferred Bidder as
Successful Bidder. In this
Tender Document the
acknowledgment of
Successful Bidder is
dependent on the date of
submission of clearances
which is not as per the
provisions of Mineral
(Auction) Rules, 2015 and
Model Tender Document
suggested by Ministry of
Mines.
The timelines and milestones
must be in line with the
Mineral (Auction) Rules and
Model Tender Document
issued by Ministry of Mines.
It is contemplated in the
Mineral (Auction) Rules,
2015 that only a Successful
Bidder shall apply for
various approvals. Also, it
has to be considered that
unless a person has lawful
rights (or acknowledgement
from the State Government
of being a Successful
Bidder), he will not be able
to successfully get
permissions and approvals
from various regulatory
authorities.
Hence obtaining approvals
should not be a pre-
condition to be Successful
Bidder.
Tender condition prevails.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
Further Preferred Bidder can
apply for clearances, follow
up and comply with all
directions of State and
Central Government
however all the clearances
and approvals are to be
granted by Governments and
hence Bidder‟s performance
is contingent upon
performance by Government
of its obligations.
Indeed, State Government
should consider providing all
approvals in principle now.
66. Tender
Document
Clause 14.1.1 (b) – Bid
Security along with Clause
15.1
Bid Security should be valid
for 360 days from the bid due
date.
Bid security should be valid
for 240 days inclusive of
claim period of 60 ......,....
As per clause 14.12 Bid is
valid for 180 from the bid
due date. Hence, validity
of bid security should be in
the line of validity of bid
due date.
Tender condition prevails.
67. Tender
Document
Clause 14.7.2 (d.)-The
Preferred Bidder in case does
not make the initial payment
within the specified time
limits.
We understand that the
provision of this point apply
to only first instalment of the
Upfront Payment and not
entire Upfront Payment
which is to be paid by
Preferred Bidder before
issuance of LoI.
Yes, this is limited to first installment of the
Upfront Payment only (10%). However,
Preferred Bidder has to adhere the payment
milestone and timelines as specified in Section
11 & 12 of the Tender Document
68. Tender
Document
Clause 14.7.3-Any rejection
of a bid under Clause 14.7.2
may lead to the
Any rejection of a bid under
Clause 14.7.2 on account of
misrepresentation may lead
Subsequent disqualification
for a period of five years
should be made applicable
Tender condition prevails.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
disqualification of the Bidder
for bidding for any e-auction
or allotment conducted by the
State Government for a period
of 5 years starting from the
date of appropriation of the
Bid Security or any other
earlier date specified by the
State Government
to the disqualification of the
Bidder for bidding for any e-
auction or allotment
conducted by the state
government for a period of 5
years starting from the date
of appropriation of the Bid
Security or any other earlier
date specified by the State
Government
only if a misrepresentation
is made intentionally. It
should not be made
applicable to mere
omission to furnish
information or to make the
initial payment as the
punishment is onerous.
69. Tender
Document
Clause 14.11.1- Rejection of
bid –“Notwithstanding
anything contained in this
Tender Document, the State
Government reserves the right
to reject any bid and/or to
annul the tender process and
reject all bids at any time
without any liability or any
obligation for such
acceptance, rejection or
annulment, and without
assigning any reasons
thereof.”
Notwithstanding anything
contained in this Tender
Document, the State
Government reserves the
right to reject any bid and/or
to annul the tender process
and reject all bids at any time
without any liability or any
obligation for such
acceptance, rejection or
annulment with reasons to be
recorded in writing.
In order to ensure
transparency of the process
it may be advisable that the
State Government records
the reasons in writing
before rejecting any bid or
annulling the tender
process.
Tender condition prevails.
70. Tender
Document
Clause 14.13 Change
affecting the Bidder
Upon submission of the
Technical Bid, any change
affecting the Bidder regarding
compliance with the eligibility
condition shall result in
disqualification of the Bidder.
Any change in any
information submitted by the
Bidder must be immediately
communicated to the State
Upon submission of the
Technical Bid, any change
affecting the Bidder
regarding compliance with
the eligibility condition shall
result in disqualification of
the Bidder. Any change in
any information submitted
by the Bidder must be
communicated to the State
Government within a period
of 30 / 90 days
Time line can be defined
for better clarity
Not required. The bidder must immediately
communicate any change to the State
Government.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
Government
71. Tender
Document NA
Kindly clarify if there is any
provision to surrender
unutilized lease area.
The information regarding
the provision to surrender
unutilized lease area will
help the Successful Bidder
in reducing his financial
liability in terms of dead
rent, applicable taxes, etc.
and monetise its resources.
Will be governed as per provisions of Mines
and Minerals (Regulation and Development)
Act, 1957, its subsequent amendments & rules
made thereunder.
72. Tender
Document
Clause 3 (f)- Schedule E-
Mine Development and
Production Agreement : “The
Successful Bidder has neither
violated or defaulted nor has
knowledge of any violation or
default with respect to any
order, writ, injunction or any
decree of any court or any
legally binding order of any
Governmental Authority”
Since, the Bidder is already
complying with the specific
provisions the Tender
Document, the mentioned
provision which is asking to
provide an umbrella
warranty covering any
violation or default against
any decree of any court or
binding order of any
Governmental Authority
should not be covered under
warranties.
Further Bidder may be
contesting an order, writ or
judgement in higher court
etc. and hence this provision
is against Bidders right to
take legal recourses.
Clause 3 (f)- Schedule E-
Mine Development and
Production Agreement to be
removed
Since, the Bidder is already
complying with the
specific provisions the
Tender Document, the
mentioned provision; no
additional generic
warranties should be
required.
Warranties under an
Agreement should be
limited to provisions of the
Agreement.
Tender condition prevails.
73. Tender
Document
Point 6 of datasheet
mentioned on page 6 of the
Tender Document
Kindly clarify the role of the
Nodal Officer mentioned in
the Tender Document.
Government will appoint a
Nodal Officer for facilitating
all approvals, Clearances,
Consents, Land Acquisition
Nodal officer is the Officer In Charge only for
conducting the auction process.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
etc. in timely manner.
74.
General
(Mettigudipadu
- Goli(MG) –
IV Block)
Kindly clarify, whether the
deposit falls within
catchment area of various
water bodies. Also clarify,
whether the NOC from
irrigation would be required/
obtained
The limestone block is demarcated keeping a
buffer of 50m from the streams flowing
nearby.
NOC is not required from irrigation
department
75. General
During the site visit, the
State Government geologist/
Surveyor should be present
along with the Bidders.
A technical officer from the local ADMG
office will be made available during the site
visit.
76. General
The resources and mineable
cement grade reserves have
large difference, kindly
clarify how this issue will be
treated by the State
Government in terms of
Performance Security.
The value of the Performance Security has
been calculated as per Mineral (Auction)
Rules, 2015 on the estimated mineral resource
as per Mineral (Evidence of Mineral Contents)
Rules, 2015. However, appropriation of
Performance security will be depending upon
the minimum required mining quantity which
will be calculated based on Mining Plan to be
developed. This will take care of mineable
reserve.
77. General
From our past experience in
the mining, we believe that
taking control of surface area
of the mine and removal of
Surface encumbrances is one
of the most challenging task
and leads to project delay.
Given that Bidder is
committing additional
payment to Government as
well as development
Regarding the control of surface area, the
Preferred Bidder can take up separately with
the concerned / appropriate department of the
State Government.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
schedule, State Government
must commit its support,
plan and procedures it would
adopt to ensure removal of
surface encumbrances to
make it available for mining.
78. General
Detailed land schedule along
with land map, patta, khasra,
ownership and other details
should be provided along
with bid documents.
Details are available in Geological Report.
79.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources for
Mittagudipad
u – Goli
Block - IV
Section VI.3.4 at Page No. 13
- Detailed geological map
around Goli village, Guntur
District, Andhra Pradesh (Part
of Toposheet No. 56P/10)
The geological map is not
clear and Structural features
are not visible. A clear copy
of Geological Map on scale
may be provided.
The clarification will
enhance the understanding
about the geology and
structure of the area.
The map is provided as addendum to the paid
documents
80.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources for
Mittagudipad
u – Goli
Block - IV
Section IX.3.2. Core drilling –
“For one sample 3-5 cm core
has been collected in every 20
cm interval without any
contamination (pyrite, quartz
vein and styolites) and it was
homogenously mixed,
crushed, powdered and sieved
upto – 200 mesh size (BSS)”
Since entire core length has
not been analysed, the
reserves estimates at
different CaO cut-off given
in report may vary and the
actual ROM average quality
of the deposit may be
different from the estimated
quality.
All the standard activities in core drilling have
been followed.
81.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources for
Mittagudipad
u – Goli
Block - IV
Borehole Litho-log for core
borehole GJL/CD-7 drilled
in MG-IV is not available in
the report.
Borehole litho-log for core
borehole GJL/CD-7 may be
provided for better
estimation of
resources/reserves.
Kindly refer to the information in Annexure-
IV appended to the G.R.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
82.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources for
Mittagudipad
u – Goli
Block - IV
Annexure IV
Part quality data of Lower
Purple Limestone is missing
in all the boreholes drilled in
MG-IV block.
Data, if available, may be
provided to estimate the
quality and reserves as a
part of Purple can also be
utilized for cement
manufacturing.
All the data taken into account for estimation
of Limestone resources is provided in the
Geological Report.
83.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources for
Mittagudipad
u – Goli
Block - IV
Plate III
Plate III shows core
boreholes CD-5 (BH31) and
CD-8 (BH38) within the
MG-IV block, but details
(Borehole Log and Chemical
analysis) are not provided in
the Report.
Since core boreholes
provide more realistic data
about the quality and
thickness of various lith-
units of the area in
comparison to DTH
boreholes, thus details of
core boreholes is required.
Bore hole data pertaining to BH-31 and BH-
38 is not considered for estimation of
Limestone resources. Please refer to the
Geological Report.
84.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources for
Mittagudipad
u – Goli
Block - IV
Plate III
Another 2 core boreholes
CD-6(BH-36) and BH-28 are
close to MG-III and IV
blocks and data for these
boreholes is not available
Since core boreholes
provide more realistic data
about the quality and
thickness of various litho-
units of the area in
comparison to DTH
boreholes, thus details of
core boreholes is required.
BH -36 and BH-28 are not taken into account
for estimation of Limestone resources of
Block-III and Block-IV.
85.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources for
Mittagudipad
u – Goli
Block - IV
Annexure II - Extents covered
in each survey number of Sub-
block - IV of Mittagudipadu -
Goli Block - 1
Part of Patta land in the
block area is in name of
Regence Cement &
Chemicals Ltd. (20.89 Acre
in explored area and 19.14
Acre in unexplored area) and
Rajini Cement & Chemicals
Ltd. (2.70 Acre in explored
area)
Patta land owned by other
entrepreneurs, if not
available for acquisition
shall reduce the reserves
and will limit the mining
operations by forming of
no. of pits.
Acquisition of third party land shall take place
as per Clause-2 of Part-VIII of Model Form of
Mining Lease (Form-K) appended to MC
Rules, 1960.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
86.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources
for
Mittagudipa
du - Goli
Block - IV
II.1 Details of the MG-IV
Prospecting: : Geological
report of GSI for field season
2012-13 & 2013-14 the
Block:
Whether soft / hard copy of
Geological Report along
with plans prepared by GSI
shall be shared by Govt. free
of cost to Preferred Bidder
for preparation of Mining
Plan.
Government will examine the issue and
certainly extend support, as required.
87.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources
for
Mittagudipa
du - Goli
Block - IV
VIII. Mode of Investigation-
High percentage of core was
recovered in all the three units
of limestone except in the
solution cavity zones. Poor
core/sludge was recovered in
the BH-13, BH-18, BH-36
and Bh-37 mainly due to
solution cavities.
Most of the boreholes drilled
are DTH boreholes. Hence
mentioning high % of core
recovery seems not justified.
Further, due consideration
for poor recovery, cavities
and geological uncertainities
has to be given during
resources estimation.
Cavern formation is quite normal in High
Grade Limestone areas. In estimation of
limestone resources, the due care was already
taken.
88.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources
for
Mittagudipa
du - Goli
Block - IV
IX.4: Chemical Analysis:
(i) The average quality range
given is based only of the
samples analysed which may
change if excluded/or
missing data is included.
(ii) Whether missing data
will be provided by DGM
for preparing Mining Plan.
(iii) Analysis for check
samples in a third party
laboratory has not been done
as required under the
Minerals (Evidence of
Mineral Contents) Rules,
2015
(i) In estimation of limestone resources, the
due care is already taken.
(ii) The Government shall extend all needful
support to the Preferred Bidder.
(iii) In estimation of limestone resources, the
due care is already taken.
89.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources
for
X. Exploration & Sampling
Only summary of borehole
logs for 12 DTH holes are
given without furnishing
recovery percentage of DTH
Cuttings. Basic borehole logs
All the required information shall be shared
with the Proffered Bidder.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
Mittagudipa
du - Goli
Block - IV
of 3 core boreholes drilled in
block are not provided in the
document.
90.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources
for
Mittagudipa
du - Goli
Block - IV
XI.3 Twelve number of core
drill boreholes and nine
surface pits are falling in this
block. Therefore, the
limestone reserves of MG-IV
Block may be considered as
G2-Stage.
(i) As per Plate -III, 12
DTH holes have been shown
in and around Block-IV
which is contradicting to the
statement. Further, out of
12 Drill Holes, 5 (BH-7,
14,20,27 & 34)are falling out
side the block.
(ii) Please clarify whether
State Govt. permits preferred
bidder to carrry out
exploration to convert
resources into G1 Category.
(iii) Since augmentation of
exploration work (as
mentioned above) would
require time whether
timeline of 6 months for
mining plan approval would
be extended
(i) Only the influence area within the block
extent is considered for estimation of
resources as the boreholes are located on
the boundary of the block.
(ii) State Government shall permit additional
drilling by the preferred bidder.
(iii) The Government may consider the issue
on a case to case basis, depending upon
the circumstances.
91.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources
for
Mittagudipa
du - Goli
Block - IV
XI.3 it is estimated that
205.25 million tones of
limestone plus or minus 20%
variation, with an average
grade of CaO of 43.95% is
occurring in the MG-IV block.
In view of the accepted error
margin of 20%, the Upfront
payment need to be revised
for the Resources of only
164.2 million tons (205.25
million tons minus 20%)
Tender condition prevails
92.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources
for
Mittagudipa
IX.3.3 DTH Drilling -
Normally, 5% of
contamination is expected in
cae of dry borehole. In wet
borehole the contamination
level will be little more due to
(i) Considering the extent of
contamination and the
limitations of
representativeness of
samples collected through
DTH-Drilling, the reliability
(i) In this case, top horizon contamination
partings were removed manually while
preparing samples. Hence, contamination is
minimized.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
du - Goli
Block - IV
the top horizon partings also
mix up with fresh one.
of the estimates of Chemical
quality appears to be
uncertain. Further since the
partings are removed
manually before processing
the samples meant for
Chemical analysis, it is most
likely that the average
quality may be significantly
lesser than (43.95% CaO).
(ii) Thus the limestone
reserves with less than 44%
CaO cannot be blended and
the resources of Cement
Grade limestone may be
reckoned as 127.05 MT
(ii)Limestone reserves are computed based on
threshold value of limestone for cement
manufacturing given by NCCBM and also
improved beneficiation methods and improved
technology of cement manufacturing was
taken into account.
93.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources
for
Mittagudipa
du - Goli
Block - IV
Plate II Map showing the
proposed Sub Bloc Block No
IV
(i) The Map does not depict
Electrical High Tension
Lines, some of the fair
weather motorable Roads
and Dumps of Flaggy
limestone located within the
Block. These encumbrances
coupled with the safety
distances to be left unmined
may result in loss of
limestone bearing area to the
tune of about 30% of the
total mining lease area. The
estimated resrouces may
become less to that extent.
Clarification may be given
whether the said
encumbrances have been
duly considered for
estimation of the resources
(ii) Locations of Survey Nos.
(i) Safety buffer area for katcha roads,
irrigation canals, natural streams, etc., except
high tension electrical lines is excluded in
resources computation
(ii) All the required information is shown in the
map.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
291/B, 317/1, /291/14, 158,
163/11 and 150 are not
shown
94.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources
for
Mittagudipa
du - Goli
Block - IV
Annexure-II Extents covered
in each Survey Number of
Sub block IV
(i) Majority of Land is Patta
Land as per the land
schedule classification. Patta
land owned by Scheduled
Tribes and Assigned Lands if
any may be furnished.
(ii) Bifurcation of Land use
of Govt. land , viz. road,
present public utility etc
may be given.
(iii) Information in respect of
21.044 Ha of the lands is not
given and was classified as
Others. It may be clarified
whether this land is Patta or
Govt land and whether it is
covered by any Public
Utilities etc.
(iv) Some of the lands
appear to be owned by
Cement Companies. Please
clarify whether any Quarry
leases are granted or any
mineral rights enjoyed by
them.
(v) Survey no. wise extent,
classification for the 59.231
Ha unexplored area meant
for mining amenities may be
given in Annexure II (as it is
left blank).
(i)Patta land doesn‟t include assigned lands. In
the block extent, there are no assigned lands or
schedule V areas.
(ii)Lands covered under roads and other public
utilities, along with safety buffer were
excluded from the block extents.
(iii)This land may be treated as Government
land.
(iv)There are no authorized quarries in the
block.
(v)This information is already provided in
annexures of the geological report.
(vi) The additional 20% area shall be a part of
mining lease. The preferred bidder shall pay
dead rent and other applicable levies. Cement
plant cannot be established in this area.
(vii) Third party land acquisition shall be as
per clause 2 of Part-VIII of Model Form for
mining lease(Form-K) appended to Mineral
Concession Rules, 1960.
(viii) Third party land acquisition shall be as
per clause 2 of Part-VIII of Model Form for
mining lease(Form-K) appended to Mineral
Concession Rules, 1960.
(ix) Government land shall be leased to the
successful bidder as per the existing law, after
execution of mining lease.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
(vi) It is to be confirmed
whether the above land (20%
of unexplored area)
identified for mining
amenities would form a part
of the Mining Lease to be
granted without any financial
or other liabilities and
whether any establishment of
the Cement Plant can be
located in this area.
(vii) Whether Govt. will
restrain any land transactions
other than the preferred
bidder and prevent
unauthorized speculated
transfers/acquisitions of
lands covered under the
Block.
(viii) It may be elaborated
how Govt. will help in
facilitating acquisition of
land by the
Preferred/Successful bidder.
(ix) Kindly clarify whether
the Govt. land will be
mutated in favour of
Successful Bidder after grant
of Mining Lease. Will there
be any financial liability for
such transfer.
95.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources
for
Annexure-III Analytical
results of Pit samples
Out of 9 pits sunk in the
block, chemical analysis is
furnished for 5 pits only.
Reports in respect of balance
Pits may be given
All the available information is already
published in the geological report.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
Mittagudipa
du - Goli
Block – IV
96.
Geological
Report on
Limestone
Resources
for
Mittagudipa
du - Goli
Block - IV
Annexure-IV Analytical
results of core and non-core
samples.
As per summarized borehole
logs, all the 12 DTH
boreholes, have been drilled
up to 50 m depth while
chemical analysis is given
for only part of the hole as
given below:
BH No. Analysed
upto(m)
BH-7 24
BH-13 30
BH-14 24
BH-19 30
BH20 48
BH-25 36
BH-26 45
BH-27 45
BH-34 45
Further, as per map, 3 core
boreholes have been shown
in the block while analysis is
given only partly for CD-7.
Details of two core boreholes
(CD-5 & CD-8) may be
furnished.
Drilling was terminated after encountering
Banaganapalli formations and in other feasible
cases drilling was continued upto 50 mts.
targeted depth.
Borehole data is furnished for the boles which
were considered in estimation of resources.
97.
Tender
Document for
"Auction of
Mining Lease
for
Mittagudipad
u-Goli, Block
- IV,
Limestone
Block"
Schedule-I C (a) The Bid
security in the form of a bank
guarantee for 10,13,00000
and payable at Hyderabad.
May clarify the designated
authority in whose favour
Bank Guarantee is to be
prepared.
As per Corrigendum # 14, Bid security to be
addressed to -
Directorate of Mines & Geology
8th Floor, BRKR Bhavan,
Saifabad, Hyderabad 500 063
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
98.
Tender
Document for
"Auction of
Mining Lease
for
Mittagudipad
u-Goli, Block
- IV,
Limestone
Block"
Schedule-I A(f) Audited
financial statements
(comprising of cash flows,
profit & loss account and
balance sheet) indicating
annual revenue of the
immediately preceding last
three financial years viz.
2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-
15.
Whether the audited
financial statements for
preceding last three financial
years are required for
applicant who already has
cement plant in Andhra
Pradesh as on the date of
NIT and registered under
Company's Act .
Audited financial statements are required for
the all the bidders.
99.
Tender
Document for
"Auction of
Mining Lease
for
Mittagudipad
u-Goli, Block
- IV,
Limestone
Block"
Schedule-1 D(2) Format of
power of attorney: As per the
format, Separate Power of
Attorney is required for each
Mineral block even in the
same State.
As per present format, Power
of Attorney has to prepared
for each limestone block
separately though falling in
the same state and nominated
person by the Bidder is
same.
POA may not be block
specific to avoid duplicacy.
Tender condition prevails
100.
Tender
Document for
"Auction of
Mining Lease
for
Mittagudipad
u-Goli, Block
- IV,
Limestone
Block"
Clause 2.28 “Upfront
Payment” means an amount
equal to 0.50% of the value of
estimated resources payable
pursuant to the Auction Rules.
“Upfront Payment” should
be on amount equal to
0.50% of the value of
estimated Reserves and not
resources.
Tender condition prevails
101.
Tender
Document for
"Auction of
Mining Lease
for
Mittagudipad
u-Goli, Block
- IV,
Limestone
Clasue 10.3 The State Govt
and the Successful bidder
shall enter into the MDPA
upon the successful bidder
having obtained all Consents,
Approvals, Permits, No
Objections and the like as may
be required under applicable
law for commencement of
Some of the clearances for
commencement of mining
operations can be obtained
only after the execution of
mining lease such as DGMS
permission etc..
Any such clearances/permissions, which can
only be obtained after the execution of mining
lease, shall be exempted.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
Block" Mining Operation.
102.
Tender
Document for
"Auction of
Mining Lease
for
Mittagudipad
u-Goli, Block
- IV,
Limestone
Block"
Clause 10.4 Bidder should pay
all costs related to Stamp
Duty, Registration of the
Mining Plan
Please elucidate whether
Stamp Duty shall be charged
based on factor derived from
Royalty on production and
not final price offer or
estimated Resources etc.
Stamp duty shall be applicable as per the
relevant law.
103.
Tender
Document for
"Auction of
Mining Lease
for
Mittagudipad
u-Goli, Block
- IV,
Limestone
Block"
Schedule IV: Format of
MDPA
MDPA to be executed on
Stamp Paper of adequate
value
Please clarify the value of
Stamp paper required.
Stamp duty shall be applicable as per the
relevant law.
104.
Tender
Document for
"Auction of
Mining Lease
for
Mittagudipad
u-Goli, Block
- IV,
Limestone
Block"
Clause 19.4.2
The Stamp Duty payable for
this agreement shall be borne
by the Successful Bidder
Please clarify the value of
Stamp Duty for the MDPA
Agreement
Stamp duty shall be applicable as per the
relevant law.
105.
Geol. Report
on Limestone
Resources for
Pillutla –
Piduguralla
block,
Guntur
III. Details of PP Limestone
Block
GSI explored area of PP-II
&PP-V is 220.887 ha. In
this, AP Govt granted 3 ML
&1 QL over an extent of
74.122 ha. May please
indicate the net limestone
area available and the
quantum of limestone
The 3 MLs and 1 QL have been excluded from
the block extents and from computation of
resources.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
reserves
106.
DO DO The net limestone area is not
a single contiguous block but
separated by operating MLs.
The right of way for path for
the granted MLs to be
considered through the net
available area, then the area
will be reduced further from
the net available area. And
details of worked out pits not
mentioned nor shown.Pl
clarify?
Government shall issue directions to the
existing lease holders to allow the
transportation of men and material from their
leases as per the rights reserved under lease
deed agreement.
107.
DO Plate-2 PP Combined map Safety distance to be
considered for presence of
electrical LT Line,11 KV
Line,33 kv line and canals in
the Limestone Block. Then
to what extent the net
available limestone area and
limestone resources will be
reduced ?
Area covered under roads and other public
utilities has been excluded from the total
extent of the block. The successful bidder may
realign the electrical lines and Government
shall facilitate the change of alignment.
108.
DO XI. Estimations GSI estimated limestone
reserves under Indicated and
Inferred category as 63.50
and 95.31million tonnes
respectively. The total
reserves of limestone being
158.631 mi.tonnes. Mineable
reserves only be considered
for valuation. And data
regarding land boundaries
and reserves to be as per
requirement of IBM to be
confirmed before
commencement of auction
process.
Tender conditions prevail.
109. Geol. Report
on Limestone
XI. Estimations Estimated Geological
reserves as per document is
Limestone reserves are computed based on
threshold value of limestone for cement
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
Resources for
Pillutla –
Piduguralla
block,
Guntur
158.631 Million Tonne of
cement grade limestone with
avg of CaO 41.964 %.The
above grade of limestone is
not cement grade. The
quality of cement grade
limestone to be specified
with CaO not less than 43.5
to 44.0%.To maintain this
quality, we require high
grade limestone(sweetener)
that is CaO > 48 % to make
the above grade usable for
making cement. Kindly let
us know from where do we
get this quality of limestone?
manufacturing given by NCCBM.
110.
DO DO Bore holes drilled are 107,
Still the entire area not
covered as per the UNFC
guidelines. As the deposit is
un disturbed and based on
the geological features,the
drilling data was
extrapolated for assessing
the deposit.For systematic
evaluation of reserves under
mineable category,additional
drilling required.Geological
Plan and Geological cross
sections may be made
available for net limestone
area.
All the available information shall be shared
with the preferred bidder.
111.
do DO For preparing mining plan a
large no of base line date is
required like topographic
survey, detailed geological
report, sections and base line
environmental data ( at least
one quarter) , Will the same
Tender conditions prevail.
The Government may consider the issue of
extending the timeline on a case to case basis,
depending upon the circumstances.
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
be provided by GOAP, if not
than time line of 6 month is
not sufficient for preparation
of Mine Plan.
112.
DO DO Preparation of Mine Plan for
submission to IBM may not
be possible on the basis of
Indicated and Inferred
reserves estimated by GSI as
the UNFC guidelines were
not followed. GOAP may
kindly get exemption for
approving the Mining Plan
with the available data. For
this entire data may please
be sent to IBM for
acceptance. Kindly advise.
This block may be auctioned
for PL cum ML
The Government may consider the request of
the preferred bidder to undertake additional
drilling to generate adequate data for
preparation of mine plan.
113.
DO DO Time period of 2 years from
the date of LOI may not be
sufficient to get the Mine
Plan approval from IBM,EC
from MOEF and CFE from
PCB. Time period of 3 yrs
may be given.
Tender condition prevails
114.
TENDER
DOCUMENT
Data Sheet Point.1&2-Value of
resources mentioned at
INR7,832.41Crores for
158.631 mi.tonnes, where as
the cement grade limestone
available (%CaO>43.5) is
around 55 mi.tonnes, so the
value of resources should be
INR 2736.86 Crores and
correspondingly the amount
of bid security to be reduced
from INR7.83 Crores to INR
2.73 Crores.Pl clarify ?
Tender condition prevails
115. DO DO Point-4:Amount of upfront
payment to be furnished in 3
In case the preferred bidder withdraws, Bid
Security and first installment of upfront
REPLY TO PRE BID QUERIES
AUCTION OF MINING LEASE FOR LIMESTONE BLOCKS IN THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
S.No. Document Clause No. and Existing
Provision Clarification Required
Suggested Text for
Amendment, if any
Rationale for
Clarification or
Amendment
Reply
installments and after
payment of First installment,
the bidder withdraws
In such a case, will the Bid
security and First installment
of upfront payment be
refunded to unsuccessful
bidders.
payment will be forfeited.
116.
TENDER
DOCUMENT
Clause 10.3 Purchase of entire Private
land within the stipulated
time frame may not be
possible. For executing the
deed can GOAP may kindly
arrange land through
acquisition.
Acquisition of third party land shall take place
as per Clause-2 of Part-VIII of Model Form of
Mining Lease (Form-K) appended to MC
Rules, 1960.