Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )) No. 09 CR 830)
v. ) Judge Harry D. Leinenweber)) UNDER SEAL
TAHAWWUR HUSSAIN RANA )
GOVERNMENT’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT RANA’S UNDER SEAL MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
The United States of America, by and through its attorney, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, United States
Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, respectfully submits this Memorandum in Opposition
to Defendant Rana’s Under Seal Motion to Suppress Evidence.
I. Background
The defendant moves to suppress the results of three search warrants, arguing that the affiant
omitted material information from the affidavit submitted in support of the application for such
warrants. More specifically, the defendant points to the fact David Headley, when arrested, first
stated that Rana was not witting of his criminal activities and then later refused to answer any
questions about Rana (as well as Headley’s wife), noting that Rana was his “only friend.”
Considering the substantial volume of information in the affidavit that established probable cause
to believe that evidence would be recovered at the three physical addresses, the omission of this
information was not material. Even had the statements, and refusals to make statements, about Rana
had been included in the affidavit, probable cause to believe that evidence existed at these locations
still existed. For this reason, the Court should deny defendant’s motion without a hearing.
1
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1815
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
A. The Government Obtained Two Sets of Search Warrants
On October 2, 2009, the government sought five search warrants based on a single affidavit
for the following locations:
• 09 M 479: Rana’s business (the business identified as the Immigrant Law Center,located at 2809 W. Devon, Chicago, Illinois)
• 09 M 480: Headley’s luggage
• 09 M 481: Rana’s residence Illinois)
• 09 M 482: Rana’s farm property (the farm property located at 6260 S. KinsmanRoad, Kinsman, Illinois)
• 09 M 483: Headley’s residence (the apartment located at llinois)
The 65-page affidavit submitted in support of the applications for these search warrants outlined a
substantial amount of evidence, including intercepted emails, recorded telephone conversations,
recorded in-person conversations, public records, information from a Customs and Border Patrol
inspector, phone records, physical surveillance, records reflecting the location of internet protocol
addresses, subscriber records and information from other sources. Based on this information,
Magistrate Judge Keys determined that there was probable cause to believe that evidence of federal
crimes would be found at the addresses and issued the search warrants. Attached hereto as Exhibit
A is a copy of the affidavit submitted on October 2, 2009.
The following day, on October 3, 2009, federal agents arrested David Headley at O’Hare
airport, where he was to board a flight to Philadelphia with the ultimate destination being Pakistan.
2
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:1816
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
After his arrest, Headley agreed to be interviewed by FBI agents. Because Headley had agreed to1
be interviewed and because this interview lasted a number of days, the government did not execute
the search warrants for the physical addresses. Instead, the government executed only the search
warrant on Headley’s luggage. Found in Headley’s luggage, among other pieces of evidence, was
a memory stick containing surveillance videos taken in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anticipating the expiration of the unexecuted search warrants, on October 9, 2009, the
government again sought search warrants for four of the five above-identified premises (all but
Headley’s luggage). The information provided in the applications on October 9, 2009, was
substantially similar to that information submitted in support of the October 2, 2009 applications,
except that information relating to what was found in Headley’s luggage and approximately six
paragraphs summarizing information by Headley were added. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a copy
of the single affidavit submitted in support of the October 9, 2009 applications.
On October 18, 2009, federal agents arrested the defendant and executed the search warrants
at the four physical addresses. The defendant now moves to suppress evidence obtained during the
execution of three of these search warrants, those for his residence, his business and his farm.
B. Evidence in the Affidavit
As mentioned, the 75-page affidavit submitted in support of the request for search warrants
contained information from a variety of sources, but mainly described intercepted emails and
recorded conversations that established probable cause to believe that Headley and others
participated in a conspiracy to commit terrorist attacks involving murder, kidnaping and maiming
Having obtained the search warrants prior to Headley’s arrest, the affidavit1
submitted in support of the October 2, 2009 applications for search warrants, of course, includedno information provided by Headley.
3
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:1817
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
outside the United States, including Mumbai, India and Copenhagen, Denmark, and that defendant
Rana conspired to provide material support to that conspiracy. In summary, emails exchanged2
between Headley and co-defendant Abdur Rehman Hashim Syed (“Pasha”) in late 2008 and early
2009 revealed that Headley intended to travel to Copenhagen in January 2009 in order to conduct
surveillance and “get a feel for the property.” (Ex. B, ¶59) An intercepted email also demonstrated
that Headley had typed a list of items to prepare for this trip, which was titled “Mickey Mouse” and
contained multiple entries that were consistent with his task to perform surveillance. (Id. ¶51)
During the email exchanges, Headley and Pasha discussed Rana and, in particular, Headley
expressed his readiness for “MMP” (the Mickey Mouse Project), but indicated that he needed to
consult with Rana before he traveled. (Id. ¶59) Subsequent email correspondence revealed that Rana
arranged for Headley’s travel to Denmark. (Id. ¶61)
Headley Requests Rana’s Assistance During his First Reconnaissance Trip to Copenhagen
Additional email correspondence demonstrated that Headley, in fact, traveled to Copenhagen
in January 2009 and visited two locations of the Jyllands Posten newspaper, which had published
cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed in 2005 and toward whom Headley had expressed a
disposition for violence in a forum for alumni of a Pakistani school where both Headley and Rana
had attended. (Id. ¶¶48-50, 60-67) Email correspondence established that Headley had gained entry
to the newspaper facilities by falsely representing himself to be a representative of Rana’s business.
Headley, in fact, informed Rana by email that he had provided a card identifying himself as a
representative of Rana’s business and, based on a concern that the newspaper would contact other
The government adopts as though stated herein the allegations of the affidavit2
submitted in support of the application for search warrants. Due to the volume of informationtherein, this Response provides only a summary.
4
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:1818
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
offices listed on such card, Headley asked Rana to ask the other offices to “remember” him such that
his cover was not blown. (Id. ¶¶62-64) When the newspaper emailed Headley following his visit,
Rana falsely posed as David Headley and sent a reply email. (Id. ¶67) The affidavit cited a number
of facts (established through several sources) that demonstrated it was implausible that Headley was
visiting the newspapers for business reasons. (Id. ¶69)
Rana’s Creation of Coded Account
The affidavit further outlined, based on email correspondence and subscriber records, that
Rana passed a coded message to Headley in March 2009, stating:
One of my brothers in Brigadier Movadat Hussain Rana and the other is Sibte HassanRana monie. They are in Rawalpindi. I really admire emails making it instant halfmulaquat especially yahoo as it seems superior to hotmail. Talk to you later.
(Id. ¶73)(emphasis supplied). Subscriber records revealed that the mov.monie@yahoo account was
created on or about March 6, 2009, at a particular internet protocol address, the user of which was
located at the business address of Rana’s business, First World Immigration. The subscriber name
provided when this account was opened was “Mr Mov Monie” with a date of birth of February 13,
1962. RANA’s actual birthdate is exactly one digit off from the month, date and year provided to
open the mov.monie@yahoo account. In a subsequent email, Headley asked Rana to contact Pasha,
with whom Headley had been communicating extensively about the “Mickey Mouse Project.” (Id.
¶¶54-59, 75) When Headley later returned to Chicago, Rana once again arranged for his travel. (Id.
¶78)
Concern Over Pasha’s Arrest
Email correspondence later established that Pasha was arrested by Pakistani authorities in
or around mid-July 2009. (Id. ¶79). In later email correspondence with Headley, an individual
5
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:1819
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
identified in the affidavit as Lashkar Member A (Sajid Mir) expressed concern over the arrest of
Pasha and, more specifically, whether he was “singing or what.” (Id. ¶¶99-100). After Pasha’s
release from custody, Headley and Pasha engaged in numerous recorded telephone conversations,
as summarized below. Additionally, Rana spoke to Pasha in a recorded telephone call. Using code,
Rana asked Pasha about his arrest: “okay, you remember when you had fever during that time did
you ever faint due to the fever?” Pasha responded, “no, no, no, no, no, no. Th-th-that all was fine,
there wasn’t any problem” (Id. ¶105)
Communications with Lashkar Member Sajid
The affidavit further described a series of email communications between Headley and
Lashkar Member A that occurred throughout July and August of 2009. In the coded exchanges,
Lashkar Member A indicated that he wanted to see Headley in order to discuss additional
surveillance activity in India. (Id. ¶¶80-92, 98-100). Further, the emails alluded to Headley’s
previous surveillance activity in Mumbai and reflected Headley’s questions about the “Northern
Project,” another codename for the planning of an attack in Copenhagen, which the emails had
revealed was postponed by Lashkar Member A. Among other statements referring to Headley’s
prior surveillance work in Mumbai, Headley asked “the visit to Rahul’s place [India], is it for
checking out real estate property like before.” (Id. ¶88)
Second Reconnaissance Trip to Copenhagen
The affidavit also described Headley’s second surveillance trip to Copenhagen. While in
Copenhagen, Headley took short videos of several locations in Copenhagen. When later arrested (in
October 2009), the government seized these videos from Headley’s luggage. (Id. ¶128) As before,
Rana made travel arrangements for Headley. Upon his return, Headley falsely told a Customs and
6
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:1820
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Border Inspector that he was a consultant for Rana’s business. (Id. ¶95)
As described in more detail in the complaint, throughout August and September, Headley and
Pasha spoke by phone and otherwise communicated about continued planning for an attack in
Denmark. They awaited word from Ilyas Kashmiri, with whom Headley and Pasha had discussed
the potential attack. Headley discussed options, including Option “B” (“I [Headley] can do it on my
own”) if communications with “doctor [Kashmiri] failed or if the “doctor” and his people were
otherwise unable to assist (“if they are not fulfilling on it”). (Id. ¶103) Further, on September 7,
2009, Headley and Pasha talked about whether Pasha had been able to convey certain information
to Kashmiri (Headley: “you need to tell him everything”). (Id., ¶107) That same day, Headley and
Rana discussed the same issue. Headley explained to Rana that “Pasha has not been able to pass on
the report to him [Kashmiri].” (Id. ¶109)
Rana and Headley Discuss “Targets”
In the same September 7, 2009 conversation between Rana and Headley, they discussed and
named multiple targets of their planning. Headley listed four targets, one of which was “Denmark.”
(Id. ¶110) Later in the conversation, Headley added a fifth target: “oh my friend, not four, five,
five.” (Id.) While Rana laughed, Headley stated “Defense College” twice, and Rana commented
“right, this is it. I knew already.” After other discussion, Rana continued “That one, uh, I thought
that was the target.” Although this conversation was mainly in Urdu, Rana used the English word
“target.” (Id.)
Rana and Headley Discuss News of Kashmiri
Later in September, there were press reports that Ilyas Kashmiri was killed in a drone attack.
On September 14, 2009, Headley related the news to Rana, who responded “pray that this should not
7
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:1821
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
have happened.” (Id. ¶113) Following the news of Kashmiri’s alleged death (the reports turned out
to be inaccurate), Headley and Pasha discussed returning to Lashkar Member Sajid Mir to continue
planning for the Denmark attack, but (referring to the above-described emails) Headley noted that
Sajid was focused on India (“their eyes are again in that direction”). (Id. ¶117)
On September 18, 2009, Headley forwarded a news article about Kashmiri to Rana. (Id.
¶¶28, 120) Among other details, the article identified Kashmiri as one of the most dangerous
al Qaeda-linked Pakistani commanders, that he had been charged with murder and kidnaping, and
that he was number 4 on Pakistan’s Most Wanted List. (Id.) After learning a few days later that
Kashmiri was alive after all, Rana reacted to the news: “wow, all praise be to God.” (Id. ¶126)
Headley also learned that Kashmiri was asking about him (Headley), and Headley had plans to travel
to Pakistan. (Id. ¶¶125, 127)
Before Headley traveled to Pakistan, Rana made efforts to obtain a visa for Headley by
contacting the Consul General at the Pakistani Consulate in Chicago. Rana, Headley and the Consul
General all went to school together, however, the Consul General knew Headley only by his birth
name (Gilani). Despite the fact that they knew each other, Rana stated only that he wished to obtain
a visa for a white American who had no Pakistani background at all. When the Consul General
suggested that Rana send his friend to the Consulate, Rana explained that he sent his friend
elsewhere to take care of some unspecified business so that someone else would visit. It was clear
from the conversation that Rana was attempting to deceive the Consul General into issuing the visa
without knowing for whom the visa was issued. (Id. ¶ 124) A few days later, agents arrested
Headley at O’Hare Airport, where he was intending to travel to Pakistan after stopping in
Philadelphia. (Id. ¶¶128)
8
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:1822
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Search Locations
Based on the evidence outlined in the affidavit, the government submitted that there was
probable cause to believe that evidence would be found in the search locations. As to Rana’s
residence, among other relevant facts (including evidence of tax violations), the government noted
that physical and electronic surveillance had established that Headley had visited Rana’s residence
on multiple occasions. (Id. ¶142) Further, there was evidence to believe that emails, including the
above-described email to the Jyllands-Posten where Rana posed as Headley to assist his ruse of
being interested in an ad, were sent from that location. (Id. ¶144) As to Rana’s farm, among other
relevant facts, the government noted that surveillance had observed Headley and Rana at this
location. (Id. ¶155) Further, records established that Headley used computers at the farm to access
his email accounts. (Id. ¶ 156) As to Rana’s business, among other relevant facts (including
evidence of immigration and visa fraud), the government noted that physical surveillance had
observed that Headley frequently visited that location throughout August and September 2009. (Id.
¶161) Further, as mentioned above, emails and other evidence established that Headley had used
First World as a cover story for his extended stays in Mumbai. Lastly, records established that the
mov.monie@yahoo account was created at that address. (Id. ¶162)
II. The District Court Should Deny Defendant’s Motion to Suppress
A. Legal Standard for Motion to Suppress
The Fourth Amendment requires, absent certain exceptions, that the government obtain a
search warrant from a neutral and disinterested magistrate before commencing a search. United
States v. Robinson, 546 F.3d 884, 887-88 (7 Cir. 2008). In seeking a search warrant, theth
government must establish, considering the totality of the circumstances, that there is sufficient
9
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:1823
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
evidence to cause a reasonably prudent person to believe that a search will uncover evidence of a
crime. Id. This is a common-sense, non-technical determination based not on individual facts, but
on the totality of the circumstances known at the time the warrant is requested. United States v.
Aljabari, 626 F.3d 940, 944 (7 Cir. 2010). The circumstances need only indicate a reasonableth
probability that evidence of a crime will be found in a particular location; neither an absolute
certainty nor a preponderance of the evidence is necessary. Id. The Seventh Circuit has made clear
that direct evidence linking a crime to a particular place is not necessary. Id. The affidavit need only
contain facts that, given the nature of the evidence sought and the crime alleged, allow for a
reasonable inference that there is a fair possibility that evidence will be found at a particular place.
Id.
The Fourth Amendment further requires an evidentiary hearing regarding the veracity of the
information included in an application for a search warrant if the defendant is able to make a
“substantial preliminary showing that a false statement knowingly and intentionally made, or with
reckless disregard for the truth, was included by the affiant in the affidavit, and if the allegedly false
statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause.” Robinson, 546 F.3d at 887-88 (quoting
Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-546 (1978) (emphasis supplied)) A defendant similarly may
challenge an affidavit by showing that the affiant intentionally or recklessly omitted material
information. Robinson, 546 F.3d at 888. Here, defendant does not allege that any intentionally false
statements were included in the application; instead, defendant asserts that the affidavits intentionally
or recklessly omitted material information, namely, statements made by Headley during his post-
arrest questioning.
In determining whether the omitted information is material, the court “examine[s] whether
10
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:1824
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
a hypothetical affidavit that included the omitted material would still establish probable cause.”
Robinson, 546 F.3d at 888. “[A]n omitted detail is ‘material’ only if its inclusion would upset a
finding of probable cause.” United States v. McDuffy, 636 F.3d 361, 363 (7 Cir. 2011). th
B. A Hypothetical Affidavit with Headley’s Post-Arrest Statements Would StillEstablish Probable Cause
In his motion, defendant does very little to address the evidence outlined in the 75-page
affidavit submitted in support of the application for the search warrants. Instead, defendant
essentially argues that the government lacked probable cause to search the three locations associated
with Rana (his residence, farm and business) because his friend, Headley, offered innocent
explanations for Rana and simply refused to discuss Rana. Headley explained: “I just have only one
friend, that’s Dr. Rana.” Headley further stated:
. . . he’s the only one [friend]. . . . And uh, and I would not like to answer questionsabout either him or my wife. . . . Because um . . . they’re not, uh, they’re not involvedin anything . . . and if . . . if, you’re going to, I have to say I know . . . they, they doknow something . . . it’s, it’s . . . like my wife knows something or Dr. Rana knowssomething . . . it’s just because of their closeness to me, and they should, I don’t feelthat they should uh, uh you know, be targeted not only for . . . for, for that, that’s it.
(Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a preliminary transcript of Headley’s video-taped post-arrest
statement, at USDOJ_ 04-945-96). Shortly after identifying him as his only friend, Headley again
stated that he did not want to talk about Rana:
And I also mentioned that anything that’s incriminating Dr. Rana . . . uh, I’m notgonna . . .anything else you want me to do, I’ll give my life.
(Ex. C, USDOJ_04-1144) Defendant’s argument that the omission of such statements was material
is flawed for several reasons.
First, the Seventh Circuit has made clear that the offering of an innocent explanation does
11
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:1825
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
not negate probable cause, especially where the totality of the circumstances shows the explanation
to be unlikely or even implausible. Reed, 443 F.3d at 603; Funches, 327 F.3d at 587. Here, the
totality of the evidence overwhelmingly established probable cause to believe that Rana knowingly
provided and concealed the material support provided to Headley’s efforts, regardless of Headley’s
statements. As described above, the emails, recorded conversations (including their discussion of
“Denmark” as a “target”), physical evidence, surveillance and records discussed in the affidavit
established this probable cause. As the Court noted in deciding Rana’s request for a bond, the
“evidence in the form of recorded conversations, while not conclusive, appears to corroborate the
Government’s contention that [Rana] was a knowing ally of Headley and had been acquainted in
advance of the Mumbai attacks.” (R. 69 at 1) Inclusion of Headley’s statements, or refusals to make
statements, would not have negated the probable cause established by these recordings, emails and
other evidence.
Second, independent of Rana’s complicity, the evidence established that there was probable
cause to believe that evidence of the articulated offenses would be found at each of the search
locations. Surveillance established that Headley frequented each of the locations. Records
demonstrated that Headley used the computer at the farm to access email accounts. The evidence
also established that a communication with the Jyllands-Posten, the target of the planning, was sent
from Rana’s residence. Lastly, considering Headley’s use of the Immigrant Law Center as his cover,
there was probable cause to believe that there would be evidence at that office, including records
relevant to the operation of the Mumbai office. Once again, inclusion of Headley’s statements would
not have negated the probable cause.
Third, the record demonstrates that the Magistrate’s determination that probable cause
12
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:1826
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
existed had little to do with what Headley said or did not say. Indeed, the Magistrate Judge found
that probable cause existed to believe that evidence would be found at the search locations before
Headley ever said a word. (Exhibit A)
In short, considering the totality of the evidence outlined in the 75-page affidavit, the
government submits that a Court would still have found that probable cause existed when
considering a hypothetical affidavit that contained Headley’s explanations or refusals relating to
Rana. The omissions were not material and, as such, the defendant has failed to meet his burden in
requesting an evidentiary hearing. McDuffy, 636 F.3d at 364 (affirming the denial of a Franks
hearing based on its consideration of a hypothetical affidavit); Robinson, 546 F.3d at 887-88
(affirming denial of a Franks hearing based on consideration of a hypothetical affidavit).
WHEREFORE, the government respectfully requests that defendant’s motion be denied.
Respectfully submitted,
PATRICK J. FITZGERALDUnited States Attorney
By:/s/ Daniel J. CollinsDANIEL J. COLLINSVICTORIA J. PETERSSARAH E. STREICKERAssistant United States Attorney219 South Dearborn Street,5th FloorChicago, Illinois 60604(312) 886-3482
13
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:1827
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
EXHIBIT A
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 1 of 66 PageID #:1828
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 2 of 66 PageID #:1829
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 3 of 66 PageID #:1830
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 4 of 66 PageID #:1831
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 5 of 66 PageID #:1832
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 6 of 66 PageID #:1833
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 7 of 66 PageID #:1834
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 8 of 66 PageID #:1835
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 9 of 66 PageID #:1836
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 10 of 66 PageID #:1837
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 11 of 66 PageID #:1838
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 12 of 66 PageID #:1839
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 13 of 66 PageID #:1840
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 14 of 66 PageID #:1841
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 15 of 66 PageID #:1842
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 16 of 66 PageID #:1843
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 17 of 66 PageID #:1844
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 18 of 66 PageID #:1845
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 19 of 66 PageID #:1846
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 20 of 66 PageID #:1847
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 21 of 66 PageID #:1848
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 22 of 66 PageID #:1849
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 23 of 66 PageID #:1850
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 24 of 66 PageID #:1851
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 25 of 66 PageID #:1852
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 26 of 66 PageID #:1853
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 27 of 66 PageID #:1854
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 28 of 66 PageID #:1855
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 29 of 66 PageID #:1856
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 30 of 66 PageID #:1857
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 31 of 66 PageID #:1858
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 32 of 66 PageID #:1859
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 33 of 66 PageID #:1860
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 34 of 66 PageID #:1861
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 35 of 66 PageID #:1862
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 36 of 66 PageID #:1863
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 37 of 66 PageID #:1864
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 38 of 66 PageID #:1865
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 39 of 66 PageID #:1866
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 40 of 66 PageID #:1867
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 41 of 66 PageID #:1868
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 42 of 66 PageID #:1869
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 43 of 66 PageID #:1870
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 44 of 66 PageID #:1871
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 45 of 66 PageID #:1872
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 46 of 66 PageID #:1873
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 47 of 66 PageID #:1874
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 48 of 66 PageID #:1875
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 49 of 66 PageID #:1876
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 50 of 66 PageID #:1877
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 51 of 66 PageID #:1878
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 52 of 66 PageID #:1879
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 53 of 66 PageID #:1880
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 54 of 66 PageID #:1881
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 55 of 66 PageID #:1882
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 56 of 66 PageID #:1883
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 57 of 66 PageID #:1884
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 58 of 66 PageID #:1885
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 59 of 66 PageID #:1886
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 60 of 66 PageID #:1887
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 61 of 66 PageID #:1888
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 62 of 66 PageID #:1889
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 63 of 66 PageID #:1890
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 64 of 66 PageID #:1891
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 65 of 66 PageID #:1892
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-1 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 66 of 66 PageID #:1893
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
EXHIBIT B
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 1 of 76 PageID #:1894
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 2 of 76 PageID #:1895
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 3 of 76 PageID #:1896
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 4 of 76 PageID #:1897
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 5 of 76 PageID #:1898
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 6 of 76 PageID #:1899
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 7 of 76 PageID #:1900
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 8 of 76 PageID #:1901
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 9 of 76 PageID #:1902
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 10 of 76 PageID #:1903
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 11 of 76 PageID #:1904
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 12 of 76 PageID #:1905
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 13 of 76 PageID #:1906
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 14 of 76 PageID #:1907
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 15 of 76 PageID #:1908
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 16 of 76 PageID #:1909
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 17 of 76 PageID #:1910
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 18 of 76 PageID #:1911
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 19 of 76 PageID #:1912
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 20 of 76 PageID #:1913
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 21 of 76 PageID #:1914
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 22 of 76 PageID #:1915
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 23 of 76 PageID #:1916
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 24 of 76 PageID #:1917
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 25 of 76 PageID #:1918
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 26 of 76 PageID #:1919
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 27 of 76 PageID #:1920
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 28 of 76 PageID #:1921
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 29 of 76 PageID #:1922
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 30 of 76 PageID #:1923
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 31 of 76 PageID #:1924
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 32 of 76 PageID #:1925
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 33 of 76 PageID #:1926
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 34 of 76 PageID #:1927
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 35 of 76 PageID #:1928
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 36 of 76 PageID #:1929
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 37 of 76 PageID #:1930
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 38 of 76 PageID #:1931
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 39 of 76 PageID #:1932
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 40 of 76 PageID #:1933
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 41 of 76 PageID #:1934
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 42 of 76 PageID #:1935
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 43 of 76 PageID #:1936
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 44 of 76 PageID #:1937
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 45 of 76 PageID #:1938
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 46 of 76 PageID #:1939
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 47 of 76 PageID #:1940
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 48 of 76 PageID #:1941
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 49 of 76 PageID #:1942
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 50 of 76 PageID #:1943
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 51 of 76 PageID #:1944
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 52 of 76 PageID #:1945
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 53 of 76 PageID #:1946
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 54 of 76 PageID #:1947
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 55 of 76 PageID #:1948
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 56 of 76 PageID #:1949
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 57 of 76 PageID #:1950
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 58 of 76 PageID #:1951
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 59 of 76 PageID #:1952
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 60 of 76 PageID #:1953
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 61 of 76 PageID #:1954
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 62 of 76 PageID #:1955
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 63 of 76 PageID #:1956
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 64 of 76 PageID #:1957
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 65 of 76 PageID #:1958
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 66 of 76 PageID #:1959
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 67 of 76 PageID #:1960
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 68 of 76 PageID #:1961
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 69 of 76 PageID #:1962
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 70 of 76 PageID #:1963
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 71 of 76 PageID #:1964
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 72 of 76 PageID #:1965
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 73 of 76 PageID #:1966
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 74 of 76 PageID #:1967
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 75 of 76 PageID #:1968
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 76 of 76 PageID #:1969
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
EXHIBIT C
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-3 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1970
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-3 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1971
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT
Case: 1:09-cr-00830 Document #: 297-3 Filed: 07/20/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1972
CREDIT INTELWIRE.COM FOR THIS DOCUMENT