CALCULATION OF STABILITYFOR SHIPS LOADING BULK GRAINAMSA

Australian MaritimeSafety Authority

IMPORTANT - READ INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK PAGE BEFORE COMMENCING TO FILL IN THIS FORM

TABLE 1 GENERAL PARTICULARSName of Ship Port of registry Official Number

Type of Ship

Bulk Carrier Tween Decker Tanker Other - SpecifySummer Draft Summer Freeboard Summer Displacement

Summer Deadweight F.W.A. T.P.C

Loading Port(s)

Discharging Port(s)

Grain Stability information, approval authority and date

Cargo Plan: Indicate holds, tween decks, coamings / trunks, type of grain, secured and unsecured surfaces and ballast

AFTER FOREHOLD 5 HOLD 4 HOLD 3 HOLD 2 HOLD 1

Departure condition

I certify that the calculations shown on this document indicate THE WORST STABILITY CONDITION that will be experienced during the voyage and that the information given in this document is correct.

Date Port Master

AMSA Surveyor DateExamined

M/V CEBiHAN ISTANBUL

13.02 M 5.519 M 67796 tons

57318 tons 30.252 CMS 56.025

Constanta

Port Said

Nippon Kaiji Kyokai

Crew and Store (constant) :258.6Bunker F.O : 820.5, D.O : 92.9Fresh Water : 333.9Draft F: 12.016 A: 12.378 M: 12.197 m / ft

Ballast : 180.0Cargo : 50977.0

Total Deadweight : 52707.9 tonnes / tons

06/02/2013

TABLE 2 CALCULATION OF KGThis table is to be completed for the worst condition that occur during the voyage - Table 4 must be filled in to show movementsof liquids during voyage.For full compartments indicate whether cargo centres "C" or volumetric centres "V" are used, if your grain stability information does not describe which are used presume "V" value used and use VCG given for the total volume of compartments.

CompartmentNumber

Grain cubicm3 / ft3

100 % Actual

Stowagefactor

Weighttonnes /tons

VCGC or Vcentres

Momentsm tonnes/ ft tons

LightshipCrew/storesCargo

Sub-total(1)-> Sub-total(2)->

LIQUID'S WORST CONDITION

Tanknumber Cont. Capa.

m3/ft3 S.G.Weighttonnes /tons

VCGm / f

Momentsm tonnes/ tons

F.S.Moments

Sub-total(S-T)-> (S-T) Total F.S.MSub-total(S-T)(1)-> S-T (2)

DISPLACEMENT-> TotalMoment

S.F. S.F. DEN.

CuFt M3 MT Lt MT M3

42.0 1.171 0.85442.5 1.184 0.84443.0 1.199 0.83443.5 1.212 0.82544.0 1.226 0.81544.5 1.240 0.80645.0 1.254 0.79745.5 1.268 0.78946.0 1.282 0.78046.5 1.296 0.77247.0 1.310 0.76347.5 1.324 0.75548.0 1.338 0.74848.5 1.352 0.74049.0 1.366 0.73249.5 1.380 0.72550.0 1.393 0.71850.5 1.407 0.71151.0 1.421 0.70451.5 1.435 0.69752.0 1.449 0.69053.0 1.477 0.67754.0 1.505 0.66455.0 1.533 0.65256.0 1.561 0.64157.0 1.589 0.62958.0 1.616 0.61959.0 1.644 0.60860.0 1.672 0.59861.0 1.700 0.58862.0 1.728 0.579

10477.7 11.586 121394.7258.6 7.084 1831.7

NO.1 CARGO HOLD 13610.1 12470.3 0.7634 9520.2 10.043 95607.8NO.2 CARGO HOLD 14852.2 13914.2 0.7634 10622.6 9.927 105454.3NO.3 CARGO HOLD 14295.0 12865.1 0.7634 9821.7 9.635 94628.5NO.4 CARGO HOLD 14865.9 14134.7 0.7634 10790.9 10.053 108483.1NO.5 CARGO HOLD 14279.7 13389.1 0.7634 10221.7 10.284 105117.8

61713.3 632517.9

F.P.TK(C) B.W. 1666.3 1.0250 24.0 0.287 6.9 492.9NO.1 W.B.TK(P)[T/S&D/B]B.W. 1439.5 1.0250 24.0 0.040 1.0 4004.9NO.1 W.B.TK(S)[T/S&D/B]B.W. 1439.5 1.0250 24.0 0.040 1.0 4004.9NO.2 W.B.TK(P)[T/S&D/B]B.W. 1537.8 1.0250 24.0 0.032 0.8 5423.7NO.2 W.B.TK(S)[T/S&D/B]B.W. 1537.8 1.0250 14.0 0.019 0.3 5257.1NO.3 W.B.TK(P)[T/S&D/B]B.W. 1540.3 1.0250 14.0 0.019 0.3 5344.3NO.3 W.B.TK(S)[T/S&D/B]B.W. 1540.3 1.0250 14.0 0.019 0.3 5344.3NO.4 W.B.TK(P)[T/S&D/B]B.W. 1173.8 1.0250 14.0 0.019 0.3 5261.9NO.4 W.B.TK(S)[T/S&D/B]B.W. 1173.8 1.0250 14.0 0.019 0.3 5261.9NO.5 W.B.TK(P)[T/S&D/B]B.W. 1246.2 1.0250 5.0 0.012 0.1 1795.0NO.5 W.B.TK(S)[T/S&D/B]B.W. 1246.2 1.0250 5.0 0.012 0.1 1795.0A.P.TK(C) B.W. 639.3 1.0250 4.0 8.236 32.9 11.0F.O.Total F.O. 2078.5 0.9800 820.5 15.002 12309.3 1795.0D.O.Total D.O. 140.9 0.8500 92.9 4.538 421.6 66.7L.O.Total L.O. 133.9 0.9000 21.0 10.734 225.4 77.7F.W.Total F.W. 509.2 1.0000 333.9 15.527 5183.7 483.0ETC Total ETC 75.7 1.0000 24.0 3.666 88.0 38.1

1472.3 18272.061713.3 632517.9 46457.3

63185.6 650789.9

TABLE 3 UPSETTING MOMENTSNote: Use of correction factor in column 5.(Alternative methods of correction should be shown in Table 5)Filled compartments:(i) If "V" centres have been used in Table 2 -- no correction is needed.

(ii) If "C" centres have been used in Table 2 -- correction factor is 1.06Partly filled compartments: Correction factor of 1.12 is to be used expect --

(i) Where "V" centres of full compartment has been used in Table 2(ii) Where table or curve of heeling moments has been adjusted for this correction.

1 2 3 4 5 6GrainDepth

orUllage

m/ft

Volumetric HeelingMoment m4/ft4

StowageFactor

m3/tonneor

ft3/ton

UncorrectedHeeling Momentm tonnes/ft tons

(2) / (3)

CorrectionFactor toallow forVe. Shift

of G.Surface

CorrectedHeeling Momentsm tonnes/ft tons

(4) * (5)Trimmed Untrimmed

Total Uncorrected Total CorrectedHeeling Moments-> Heeling Moments->

TABLE 4 MOVEMENT OF LIQUIDSTABLE 5 ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF CORRECTINGHEELING MOMENTS TO ALLOW FOR VERTICALSHIFT OF GRAIN SURFACE

Table 2 has been completed for the worst condition that will be experiencedduring the voyage. The programme of use, transfer and addition ordischarge of liquids during the voyage is expected to be as follows:

Estimated length of voyage _______ daysDaily consumption ofa) Fuel __________ tonnes / tonsb) Water __________ tonnes / tons

TABLE 6 CALCULATION OF KG & GM

Uncorrected KG from : Total Moments(Table 2)Displacement(Table 2)

Liquid F.S. gain from: Total F. S. Moments(Table 2)Displacement(Table 2)

Corrected KG

KM (from ship's hydrostatic particulars) for Displacement shown in Table 2

Least GM (must not be less than 0.3m / 12 inches)

2.65 8654.4 0.7634 6607.1 1.12 7399.9

2.27 7750.6 0.7634 5917.1 1.12 6627.13.23 11315.6 0.7634 8638.7 1.12 9675.4

1.73 6000.6 0.7634 4581.0 1.12 5130.82.07 7211.4 0.7634 5505.4 1.12 6166.0

31249.3 34999.2

10.300

0.73611.036

13.597

2.561

TABLE 7 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEELING MOMENTS

Corrected KG or GM (from Table 6)Displacement (from Table 2)

(A) Maximum Allowable Heeling Moment (from Ship's stability book)(B) Actual corrected value of Heeling Moments (from Table 3)

If (A) exceeds (B), ship complies

NOTE: Where the ship's data uses other short methods of presentation ofcompliance with the stability criteria, the space below Table 12may be used.

A

B

TABLE 8 ANGLE OF HEEL CALCULATION (FOR 12 DEG. CRITERION)

Nat Tan Angle of Heel = Sum of Corrected Heeling Moments (Table 3)Displacement(Table 2) x GM (Table 6)

= =

Angle of Heel =

If Angle is not greater than 12 degree, ship complies

TABLE 9 CORRECTED RIGHTING ARM AT 40 DEG. HEEL USING CROSS CURVES

KN or GZ for 40 degree from Cross Curves(ship's stability information) = ft / m

Where KN given:Actual GZ at 40 deg. = KN - [Corrected KG (Table 6) x Sin 40 deg.]

= Aor or

Where GZ is given Assumed KG:KG on which GZ curves are based (ship's stability information) =

Actual Corrected KG (Table 6) =

KG difference ±

Actual GZ at 40 deg. = GZ from curves ± [KG Difference x Sin 40 deg.]= A

Heeling Arm Correction = Corrected Heeling Moments (Table 3) x 0.8Displacement (Table 2)

= x 0.8 = B

A =

B =(A - B) Corrected GZ at 40 deg. heel =

If Corrected GZ exceeds 0.307 m or 1.008 ft, ship complies (see Note below)

If GZ curve in the nearest typical loaded condition shown in stability booklet is of normal form and maximum GZ occures at not less than 40 deg.,or the Angle of Flooding occures at not less than 40 deg., then the completion of Table 9 is sufficient to demonstrate compliance with requirementfor residual area. If any of these conditions are not met, Table 10 is to be completed.

2.561

63185.6

37609.664

34999.180

34999.2

63185.6 x 2.5610.216

12.389 degree

8.826

= 8.826 - [ 11.036 x 0.6428 ] 1.732

10.300

11.036

0.736

= 1.523 ± [ 0.736 x 0.6428 ] 1.996

34999.2

63185.60.443

1.996

0.4431.553