Upload
rizia-zaira
View
225
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
1/17
THE MICROEVOLUTION
TOUR .
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
2/17
The Hardy-Weinberg Law
It was discovered independently by Godfrey Hardyand Wilhelm Weinberg in 1908..
It states that the frequencies of genes in an ideal
population remain constant and their proportions stay
the same unless certain evolutionary forces affect thepopulation..
These evolutionary forces include: Mutation; Geneflow; Genetic drift; Nonrandom mating or SexuialSelection;and Natural Selection which will be
discussed shortly after this..
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
3/17
Agents of Evolution
Click on any of the following topics for
discussion.
Mutation
Gene Flow
Genetic Drift
Nonrandom Mating or Sexual Selection
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
4/17
Mutation
It refers to the alteration in the chemicalcomponent of the gene. This alteration isinheritable since it occurs in the gene level
These are the origin of all new genes andthe utmost source of genetic variation and soit permits alteration of the gene pool.
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
5/17
The most common source of mutation isRadiation.
Back to Main
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
6/17
Gene Flow
It refers to the movement of alleles from one populationto the other. This movement causes alteration of the allelefrequencies present in a gene pool.
B C D E
F
A
Back to Main
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
7/17
Immigration is the movement from a gene pool. This is the removal ofcertain alleles from the gene pool.
B C D F
A
E
Back to Main
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
8/17
Emigration is the movement toward a gene pool. It is the addition of newalleles to the population.
B C D FA E
Back to Main
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
9/17
Genetic Drift..
It refers to change in allele frequencies by randomchance.
Or Random Drift
The effect of chance events are generallynegligible. On the other hand, with a smallpopulation, the effect may have a considerableimpact.
Special Cases of Genetic Drift:BottleneckFounder Effect
Back to Main
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
10/17
Bottleneck refers to a drastic reduction in size of alarge population due to a catastrophe or otherunfavorable conditions (famine, disease, tsunami,meteor collision, etc.).
In a bottleneck event, some alleles may becompletely wiped out from a population. Here, thegenotypes of the survivors will, be the source of thesubsequent generations.
For example, the northern Elephant seal, hunted
almost to extinction, have a very uniform gene poolbecause of the 20 surviving seals in 1890; just onemale fathered all the offspring.
B C D EA F
Back to Main
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
11/17
In the Founder effect, a small number of individuals migrate to an area isolated from the originalpopulation. The gene pool of the new populationmay vary significantly from the original population
since all the alleles will be coming from themigrants which initiated the new population.
Here, some alleles may be temporarily removed
from the gene pool but these may be reintroducedthrough migration.
B C EA D F
Back to Main
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
12/17
Nonrandom Mating or Sexual Selection
In nature, the individuals in general, are particularof their mates. This increases the occurrence ofalleles with favorable characteristics.
Types include:
Assortative Matingindividuals of a
specific phenotype may seekmates of a similar phenotype.Ex. Humans tend to marrysomeone with whom theyshare to some extent suchtraits as stature, age, or evenhair color, etc.
Inbreedingthis is a special case of
assortative mating which can alterthe gene pool. Continued inbreedinginclines to homozygosity. Potentiallyharmful recessive alleles (ex.Huntingtons disease) will exert their
harmful effect on the offspring whoinherit one from both parents. Inother words, continued inbreedingincreases the chance of producing
offsprings with defective genes.
Back to Main
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
13/17
Natural Selection
A type of selection wherein naturechooses which population subgroup is themost fit..
Patterns of Natural Selection
1. Stabilizing2. Directional3. Disruptive
Back to Main
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
14/17
Stabilizing Selection
Individuals with intermediate phenotypeswill be the most likely to survive,
Ex. Neonates which have an averagebirthweight will be the most likely to suvive.
POPULATION
1 2 3
PENOTYPE
Back to Main
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
15/17
Directional Selectionindividuals with the most
favorable phenotypes are the most
common. Directional selection is usuallyobserved in a population subjected to newenvironmental condition.
Ex. The population of Melanic form ofBiston betularia increased over the
peppered form due to the industrialrevolution.
POPULATION
1 2 3
PENOTYPE
Back to Main
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
16/17
Disruptive Selectionextreme phenotypes are favored
over intermediate phenotypes
Ex. Suppose there are snails with brown,spotted brown-white,and white variants. Ifthe snails were brought to rocky areas,brown variants will most likely to survivebecause it has the most favorablephenotype for camouflage. Same with
white sand, white snails will subsist.Neither of both conditions the spotted nailswill survive.
PO
PULATION
1 2 3
PENOTYPE
Back to Main
8/3/2019 Grayda, Rolando Bse Bs1 2
17/17