green11-22-13.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    1/18

    Examining -lipoic acid for use in Diabetic Neuropathy as

    an Effective Alternative to Current Therapy

    Resident Pharmacotherapy RoundsKristle Green, PharmD

    PGY1 Pharmacy Community Practice Resident

    The University of Texas at Austin/HEB Pharmacy

    Objectives:

    1.

    Review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, goals, and treatment of diabetic neuropathic pain2.

    Discuss -lipoic acid and its use for neuropathic pain

    3.

    Discuss literature investigating the use of -lipoic acid for the treatment of diabetic neuropathic

    pain

    4.

    Provide recommendations regarding the future use of -lipoic acid in patients with diabetic

    neuropathy

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    2/18

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    3/18

    Green Page 3

    Figure 1. Mechanisms of Tissue Injury by Hyperglycemia12

    c.

    The polyol pathway (Figure 2)

    i.

    Implicated in metabolic changes that occurii.

    In hyperglycemia hexokinase is saturated resulting in increased flux of glucose into

    this pathway

    iii.

    Glucose is reduced to sorbitol which does not readily diffuse across the cell

    membrane

    iv.

    The increased amount of sorbitol in the membrane results in increased osmolality of

    the membrane, leading to potential cell damage.

    v.

    As a result of the increased sorbitol accumulation, compensatory depletion of

    endoneurial osmolytes taurine and myo-inositol occurs to maintain osmotic balance

    Figure 2. The polyol pathway12

    Hyperglycemia

    Glycationpathway

    Glycatedproteins (i.e.

    A1C)

    Alteredfunction or

    turnover

    AGE

    Receptormediated

    cytokineeffects

    Sorbitolpathway

    Sorbitol andfructose

    Osmoticeffects

    Oxidativeeffects

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    4/18

    Green Page 4

    d.

    Protein Kinase Activation

    i.

    Increased vascular permeability, impaired nitric oxide synthesis, and changes in

    blood flow

    e.

    Oxidatative Stress

    i.

    Enhanced metabolism of glucose through the polyol pathway results in enhanced

    production of oxygen and therefore oxidative stress

    ii.

    Downregulates Na-K-ATPase activity and resulting in nerve ischemia

    iii.

    Endoneurial hypoxia and microvascular damage may also occur from the

    downstream inactivation of nitrous oxide and in turn increase vascular tension along

    with decreased blood flow

    1.

    Results in subsequent nerve dysfunction

    iv.

    Indicated in causing program cell death when it results from hyperglycemia

    Figure 3: Damage to Nerves and Blood Vessels due to DSPN3

    IV.

    Diagnosis5,11,13

    a.

    Symptoms

    i.

    Distal, symmetrical pain which is often associated with nocturnal exacerbations

    ii.

    Pain commonly described as: prickling, deep aching, sharp like an electric shock,

    burning with hyperalgesia and frequent allodynia upon examinationb.

    Screening

    i.

    The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends that all patients be screened

    annually for distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DPN) starting at diagnosis of type 2

    diabetes and 5 years after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes

    ii.

    Screening test may include pinprick sensation, vibration perception, 10-g

    monofilament pressure, sensation at the distal plantar aspects of both the great

    toes and metatarsal joints, and assessment of ankle reflexes

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    5/18

    Green Page 5

    c.

    Test

    i.

    Many different approaches however many test fail to have reproducible results,

    may falsely reassure practitioners when there is indeed mild neuropathy, and/or

    may be to invasive (Table 1)

    ii.

    Abnormal nerve conduction test (NCT) is usually the first objective quantitative

    indication of the condition

    iii.

    To confirm diagnosis, severity must be assessed either by nerve conduction (NC)

    abnormality or grading (Table 2 and 3)

    Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages for different tests of neuropathy5

    Method Advantage Disadvantage

    Clinical/neurological examination Simple, easy to use Not sensitive or reproducible

    Electrophysiology Sensitive, objective Assesses only large fibers, requires special

    equipment

    Quantitative sensory tests (QST) Evaluates both large and small nerve fibers Subjective, low reproducibility, requires

    special equipment

    Sympathetic skin response (SSR) Simple, fast, objective Semi quantitative, low sensitivity

    Quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test

    (QSART)

    Sensitive, objective, reproducible Requires special equipment , time consuming

    Autonomic testing Objective, quantitative Moderate sensitivity, requires special

    equipment

    Nerve/skin biopsy Quantitative, sensitive Invasive, problems with wound healing,

    specialist histological technique to quantify

    intraepidermal nerve fiber

    Corneal confocal microscopy/Corneal

    aesthesiometry

    Rapid, noninvasive, reiterative, quantitative Requires special equipment and expertise

    Table 2. Description of the Stages of Severity10

    Grade 0 No abnormality of NC

    Grade 1a Abnormality of NC

    Grade 1b NC abnormally of stage 1a plus neurologic signs typical of DSPN but without neuropathy symptoms

    Grade 2a NC abnormality of stage 1a plus neurologic signs typical of DSPN but without neuropathy symptoms

    Grade 2b NC abnormality of stage 1a, a moderate degree of weakness of ankle dorsiflexion with or without

    neuropathy symptoms

    Table 3. Definitions of minimal criteria for typical DPN10

    Possible

    DSPN

    The presence of symptoms or signs of DPSN including the following symptoms- decreased

    sensation, positive neuropathic sensory symptoms predominantly in the toes, feet, or legs;

    or signs- symmetric decrease of distal sensation or unequivocally decreased or absent

    ankle reflexes

    Probably

    DSPN

    The presence of a combination of symptoms and signs of neuropathy include any two or

    more of the following: neuropathic symptoms, decreased distal sensation, or unequivocally

    decreased or absent ankle reflexes

    Confirmed

    DPSN

    The presence of an abnormality of NC and a symptom(s) or sign(s) of neuropathy confirms

    DSPN. If NC is normal, a validated measure of small fiber neuropathy (SFN) may be used

    V.

    Treatment3,5,9,10

    a.

    Without treatment neuropathy is a chronic and progressive disease

    b.

    Pharmacologic management mainly consists of symptomatic therapies

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    6/18

    Green Page 6

    c.

    Goals

    i.

    Arrest progressive loss of nerve function

    ii.

    Improve symptoms

    iii.

    Improve glycemic control

    d.

    ADA Recommendations

    i.

    First line- Tricyclic Antidepressants

    ii.

    Second line- Anticonvulsants

    iii.

    Opioids

    e.

    Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Consensus Treatment Guidelines Advisory Boards

    i.

    First Line

    1.

    Duloxetine, controlled-released oxycodone, pregabalin, and tricyclic

    antidepressants

    ii.

    Second Line

    1.

    Carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, tramadol, venlafaxine ER

    f.

    The American Academy of Neurology

    i.

    First line- Pregabalin

    ii.

    Second Line- venlafaxine, duloxetine, amitriptyline

    iii.

    Probably effective- gabapentin, valproate, and opioidsg.

    Evidence from clinical trials suggest a maximum response rate of approximately 50% for any

    monotherapy, however many of these therapies were found to have significant adverse

    effects (Appendix A,Table 4)

    i.

    Lack of efficacy should be judged after 2-4 weeks of treatment using an adequate

    low dose

    ii.

    Analgesic combinations may be useful to achieve this target

    Table 4. Odds ratios for efficacy and withdrawal, numbers needed to treat (NNT) and numbers needed

    to harm (NNH)3

    Drug class Odds ratioefficacy Odds ratiowithdrawal

    (secondary to AE)

    NNT NNH

    Tricyclics 22.2 (5.884.7) 2.3 (0.69.7) 1.53.5 2.717.0

    Duloxetine 2.6 (1.64.8) 2.4 (1.15.4) 5.75.8 15.0

    Traditional

    anticonvulsants5.3 (1.816.0) 1.5 (0.37.0) 2.13.2 2.73.0

    New generation

    anticonvulsants3.3 (2.34.7) 3.0 (1.755.1) 2.94.3 26.1

    Opioids 4.3 (2.37.8) 4.1 (1.214.2) 2.63.9 9.0

    VI.

    -lipoic acid (ALA)5,8,10,11a.

    Marketed as a dietary supplement

    b.

    Synthesized enzymatically in plant and animal mitochondria

    c.

    Unique in that possesses antioxidant activity in both hydrophilic and hydrophobic mediums

    and in both its oxidized (lipoic acid) and reduced forms (dihydrolipoic acid)

    d.

    Role in DSPN

    i.

    An antioxidant and free radical scavenger shown to improve symptomatic diabetic

    neuropathy

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    7/18

    Green Page 7

    ii.

    First used therapeutically in Germany to treat diabetes induced neuropathy

    iii.

    Currently approved for the treatment of DSPN in Germany in both IV and oral

    formulations

    1.

    It is also used for treatment of diabetic retinopathy in Germany

    e.

    Previous Trials (Appendix D)

    i.

    ALADIN trials (alpha-lipoic acid in diabetic neuropathy) IV use of ALA

    ii.

    SYDNEY I trial (symptoms of diabetic polyneuropathy) also investigated IV use of

    ALA

    VII. Literature Evaluation

    Trial 1: Effects of 3-week oral treatment with the antioxidant thioctic (-lipoic acid) in symptomatic diabetic

    polyneuropathy (ORPIL study). Ruhnaut K.J., Meissner H.P., Finn J.R., et al. Diabetic Medicine.1999 (16); 1040-

    1043

    Design Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of short-term oral treatment with the antioxidant thioctic acid

    (TA) or neuropathic symptoms and deficits in patients with T2DM with symptomatic polyneuropathy

    Population Type 2 diabetic outpatients with polyneuropathy recruited from the Berline Diabetes Academy

    unit

    Inclusion Criteria:

    o Age 18-70 years

    o Type 2 diabetes treated with diet, oral anti-diabetic agents and/or insulin

    o Evidence of distal symmetrical polyneuropathy with at least moderate severity of one

    or more of the typical symptoms in the feet equivalent to > 4 points in the TSS

    Exclusion Criteria:

    o Asymmetrical neuropathy of the trunk and proximal lower limbs

    o Presence of foot ulcers

    o Peripheral vascular disease

    o Myopathy

    o

    Causes of neuropathy other than diabetes and significant neurological diseaseso Participation in a study of any investigational drug for neuropathy within 3 months

    before the study

    o Use of antioxidants or vitamin B within 1 month before the study

    o Severe concomitant diseases

    o Pregnancy, lactation, or childbearing age without birth control devices

    Primary Outcomes: TSS (pain, burning, paresthesiae, and numbness) in the feet were scored at

    weekly intervals

    Methods Participants were randomly assigned to oral treatment with 600 mg of TA TID (n=12) or placebo

    (n=12) for 3 weeks

    The Hamburg Pain Adjective List (HPAL) and the Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS) were

    assessed at baseline and day 19

    Results At baseline TSS, HPAL, and NDS were not significantly different between the groupsSignificantly improved TSS pain and burning subscores

    Change from baseline to Day 19

    Placebo Thioctic Acid (ALA) P-value

    TSS in feet -1.94 + 1.50 (-24%) -3.75 + 1.88 (-47%) P = 0.021*

    HPAL -0.96 + 1.32 (-29%) -2.20 + 1.65 (-60%) P = 0.072

    NDS +0.18 + 0.4 -0.27 + 0.47 P = 0.025*

    *statistically significant

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    8/18

    Green Page 8

    Authors

    Conclusion

    Oral treatment with 600 mg of TA three times daily for 3 weeks may improve symptoms and

    deficits resulting from polyneuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients without causing significant

    adverse reactions

    Comments Strengths

    Randomized, double-blind, placebo

    controlled trial

    Exclusion of patients currently or previouslytaking antioxidants one month before the

    study

    Weaknesses

    Small sample size, only 22 patients

    completed the trial

    Short duration of treatmentNever defined the severe concomitant

    diseases excluded from trial

    Concurrent administration of insulin and/or

    oral anti-diabetic medication may have

    influenced results

    Anti-diabetic medications used during

    treatment were not disclosed

    Funded by the manufacture of ALA

    Trial 2: Oral treatment with -lipoic acid improves symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy: The SYDNEY 2 trial.

    Ziegler D., Ametov A., Barinov A., et al.Diabetes Care2006;29(11) 2365-2370.

    Design Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Objective To evaluate the effects of ALA on positive sensory symptoms and neuropathic deficits in diabetic

    patients with distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP)

    Population Patients in Israel and Russia

    Inclusion Criteria

    o Age 18-74

    o Diabetes type 1 or 2 defined by ADA criteria

    o Duration of diabetes > 1 year

    o HbA1C 7.5 points

    o Neuropathic impairment score- lower limb (NIS-LL) > 2 points

    o Pain sensation according to the pin-prick test absent or decreased

    Exclusion Criteria

    o Confounding neurologic disease or neuropathy

    o Myopathy of any cause

    o Peripheral vascular disease severe enough to cause intermittent claudication ischemic

    ulcers or limb ischemia

    o Significant hepatic or renal disease

    o Antioxidant therapy or pentoxyphylline within the last month

    o

    Use of > 50 mg ALA or use of gamma-linolenic acid containing substance with the last3 months

    Methods Patients received once daily oral doses for 5 weeks:

    o 600 mg ALA (n= 45)

    o 1200 mg ALA (n= 47)

    o 1800 mg ALA (n=46)

    o Placebo (n= 43)

    One week placebo run-in period

    Primary outcome: change from baseline of the TSS, including stabbing pain, burning pain,

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    9/18

    Green Page 9

    paresthesia, and asleep numbness of the feet

    o TSS assessed at screening, baseline, before the state or the study treatment, and after

    each week of treatment

    Secondary outcome: individual symptoms of TSS, Neuropathy Symptoms and Change (NSC)

    score, NIS, and patients global assessment of efficacy

    Results 181 diabetic patients in Russia and Israel randomized, only 166 completed the trial

    All groups were comparable in age, gender, disease state, blood pressure, polyneuropathystage

    Mean TSS did not differ significantly at baseline among treatment groups

    Safety analysis showed dose dependent increase in nausea, vomiting, and vertigo

    o Side effects reported by 27% of 600 mg group (P= 0.53), 43% of 1200 mg group (P=

    0.03), and 54% of the 1800 mg group (P < 0.001)

    Significant improvement in pain and burning subscores

    Change from baseline after 5 weeks on treatment

    ALA600 ALA1200 ALA1800 Placebo

    Mean TSS -4.9 (51%)* -4.5 (48%)* -4.7 (52%)* -2.9 (32%)

    Response rate 62% 50% 56% 26%

    Stabbing Pain -1.40* -1.56* -1.46* -0.83Burning Pain -1.32* -1.09* -1.15* -0.50

    Parethesiae -1.16 -0.85 -1.12 -0.80

    Numbness -0.97 -0.99 -0.98 -0.79

    Changes from initial screening levels after 5 weeks

    ALA600 ALA1200 ALA1800 Placebo

    NSC number -2.8* -2.8* -2.7 -1.7

    NSC severity -7.4* -7.2* -7.6* -4.9

    NSC change +8.6* +8.5* +9.5* +5.4

    NIS -3.80 -3.85 -3.85* -2.38

    NIS-LL -3.75 -2.63 -2.70 -2.08

    NIS-LL sensoryfunction

    -2.25* -1.73 -1.55 -1.05

    *statistically significant

    Authors

    Conclusions

    Oral treatment with ALA for 5 weeks improve neuropathic symptoms and deficits in patients

    with DSP

    Effects were not dose dependent

    ALA dosed at 600 mg once daily provided the optimum risk-to-benefit ratio

    Comments Strengths

    Randomized, double-blind placebo-

    controlled

    Safety analysis and adverse effects were

    reported

    Weaknesses

    Relatively small study

    Short duration of treatment

    Self-report of symptom improvement

    Randomization method was not describedInclusion of T1DM patients may have

    confounded results

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    10/18

    Green Page 10

    Trial 3: Efficacy and safety of antioxidant treatment with -lipoic acid over 4 years in diabetic polyneuropathy:

    The NATHAN I trial. Ziegler D., Low P.A., Litchy W.J., et al. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2054-2060

    Design Multicenter randomized, double-blind parallel-group trial

    Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) over 4 years in mild-moderate

    diabetic distal symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN)

    Population Patients with mild-moderate DSPN

    Inclusion Criteria:o Age 18-64 years

    o Type 1 or type 2 diabetes defined by the ADA criteria

    o Diabetes duration > 1 year

    o Presence of stage 1 or 2a DSPN attributable diabetes

    o Stable insulin regimen, weight, diet, and physical activity

    o NIS-LL and seven nerve conduction test score > 97.5th

    percentile

    o NIS-LL > 2 points

    o One of two abnormalities:

    Abnormal nerve conduction attributable in two separate nerves > 99th

    percentile for distal latency or < 1 percentile for nerve conduction velocity

    or amplitude

    Abnormal heart rate during deep breathing (HRDB) < 1

    st

    percentile or TSS inthe feet < 5 points

    o Female patients had to be either surgically sterilized, > 1 year postmenopausal, or

    practicing an acceptable method of contraception

    Exclusion Criteria:

    o Neuropathies other than DSPN

    o Myopathy and other neurological diseases that may interfere with the assessment of

    the severity of DSPN

    o Previous bilateral sural nerve biopsies

    o Peripheral vascular disease with intermittent claudication

    o Foot ulcers

    o High risk for visual loss

    o Psychiatric, psychological or behavioral symptoms that would interfere with the

    patientsability to participate in the trialo Active neoplastic disease except basal cell carcinoma

    o Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation

    o Clinically significant cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hematologic, or other

    endocrine diseases

    o Organ transplants

    o Aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase > 2 times normal

    o Serum creatinine > 1.8 and > 1.6 mg/dL for men and women respectively

    o Drug or alcohol abuse within the last year

    o Use of investigational drug within the last 6 months

    o Severe anaphylactic reaction to multiple drugs, sulfur products, or biologic products

    o Ketoacidosis or hypoglycemia within the last three months resulting in hospital

    admissiono Antioxidant therapy (> 400 IU vitamin E, > 200 mg vitamin C or > 30 mg/day beta

    carotene) or pentoxyphylline within the last month

    o Gamma linolenic acid and ALA >50 mg/day within the last 3 months

    o History of use of medications or vitamins known to cause peripheral neuropathy

    including but not limited to the use of phenytoin or carbamazepine > 15 years of use

    or > 100 mg/day pyridoxine within the last 12 months

    o Use of pain medication except for standard doses of salicylates, ibuprofen, indoles,

    fenamates, oxicams, or pyrazoles

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    11/18

    Green Page 11

    Methods 2 week screening phase, 6 week placebo run-in phase, 4 year double-blind phase, and 4-

    week washout phase

    Patients were randomly assigned to oral treatment with 600 mg ALA once daily (n= 233) or

    placebo (n= 227) for 4 years

    Primary Outcome:

    o

    Composite score (NIS-LL) and seven neurophysiologic testsSecondary outcomes:

    o NIS, NIS-LL

    Results 460 diabetic patients randomized

    Improved NIS (P=0.028), NIS-LL (P=0.05), and NIS-LL muscle weakness subscore (P=0.045)

    Changes in clinical neuropathy scores and nerve function test from baseline to 2 and 4

    years

    2 Years 4 Years

    ALA Placebo ALA Placebo

    N 214 207 215 207

    Compositescore

    NIS-LL+7(nds)

    -0.40 + 4.92 0.19 + 4.74 -0.37 + 5.59 0.29 + 5.37

    Authors

    Conclusion

    Four year treatment with ALA in mild-moderate DSPN resulted in clinically meaningful

    improvement and prevention of progression of neuropathic impairments

    ALA is well tolerated

    ALA did not influence a change in the composite score NIS-LL+7

    No statistically significant improvement in NC

    Comments Strengths

    Randomized double blind placebo

    controlled

    Appropriate time length

    Assessed nerve conductionLarge study population

    Weaknesses

    Extensive exclusion criteria may have

    influenced the patient population

    Inclusion of T1DM patients

    Stable insulin regimen was never defined

    VIII.

    Summary

    Study Patient

    type

    Primary

    outcome

    Secondary

    outcome

    ALA dosage Length of

    Study

    Difference in

    intervention vs.

    control for primary

    outcome

    ORPIL T2DM TSS HPAL, NDS a)600 mg TID 3 weeks -1.81 (P= 0.021)

    SYDNEY 2T1DM +

    T2DMTSS NCS, NIS

    a)600 mg

    dailyb)1200 mg

    daily

    c)1800 mg

    daily

    5 weeks

    -1.93 (P

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    12/18

    Green Page 12

    IX.

    Safety and Toxicity27

    a.

    Currently no established upper limit for ALA consumption in humans

    b.

    ALADIN I, II, and III and the SYDNEY I clinical trials reported no adverse effects when ALA was

    used at doses up to 2400mg/day

    c.

    Tang et al. reported that adverse events including nausea, vomiting, and vertigo, occurredmost frequently at dose of 1200-1800 mg/day

    d.

    Due to ALA improving glucose utilization there is an increased risk of hypoglycemia in

    patients using insulin or anti-diabetic agents

    X.

    Conclusions

    a.

    It is still unclear whether oral administration of ALA leads to significant improvement of

    symptomatic peripheral diabetic neuropathy

    b.

    Although promising, further studies are needed to assess long-term treatment of ALA given

    orally in an outpatient setting to assess its potential as a viable treatment option for

    patients with DSPNc.

    Studies comparing ALA with current treatment therapies are necessary to assess superiority

    and/or non-inferiority

    d.

    Studies assessing long term safety and toxicity are necessary

    XI.

    Other potential therapeutic uses for ALA26,27

    a.

    Endothelial dysfunction and Anti-inflammatory

    i.

    The ISLAND trial conducted by Sola et al. showed ALA significantly increased nitric

    oxide synthesis in human aortic endothelial cells leading to improved vasodilation

    and a 15% reduction in serum interleukin-6 levels following 4 weeks of

    supplementation with ALA 300 mg/day

    b.

    Hypotensive Agent

    i.

    Research by Takokah et al. suggests that ALA inhibits renal and vascular

    overproduction of endothelin-1, a vasoconstrictor secreted by the endothelium

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    13/18

    Green Page 13

    Appendix A13

    Meta-analysis of drug therapy vs. placebo for diabetic neuropathic pain

    Drug and dose Subjects (N) Duration(wk) Mean age (y) Measured

    outcome

    NNT (95%

    CI)

    NNH (95% CI)

    Various tricyclic

    antidepressants

    and doses

    177 3-12 50Overall

    effectiveness1.3 (1.2-1.5)

    Treatmentcessation: 28

    (17.6-68.9)

    Minor adverse

    effects: 6(4.2-

    10.7)

    Duloxetine

    60mg/d 120

    mg/d

    655

    65512 N/A

    50% pain

    reduction

    6.0 (5-10)

    6.0 (5-10)

    Treatment

    cessation: 17 (12-

    50)

    Pregablin 600mg/d 1425 5-13 59 50% painreduction 5 (4-6.6)

    Somnolence: 8.8

    (7-12)*

    Dizziness: 2.8

    (2.5-3.2)

    Treatment

    cessation: 8.8

    (6.8-12)

    Gabapentin

    1200-3600

    mg/d

    829 4-12 5850% pain

    reduction5.8 (4.3-9.0)

    Any adverse

    effect: 6.6 (5.3-

    9.0)

    Treatment

    cessation: 32 (19-

    100)

    Oxycodone 20-

    80 mg/d36 4 63

    Moderate painrelief (defined as

    a score of 3 on a

    6-point scale)

    2.6 (N/A)

    Nausea: 4(2-219)

    Constipation: 4(2-19)

    Treatment

    cessation: 7 (4-

    87)

    NNH: number needed to harm; NNT: number needed to treat

    Appendix B4

    Total Symptom Score (TSS): scoring system for neuropathic symptoms (pain, burning, paresthesia, and

    numbness). The score can range from 0 (no symptoms) to maximally 14.64 (all symptoms present, severe,

    continuous)

    Symptom

    frequency

    Absent Symptom

    Slight

    Intensity

    Moderate

    Severe

    Occasional 0 1.00 2.00 3.00

    Frequent 0 1.33 2.33 3.33

    (Almost)

    continuous

    0 1.66 2.66 3.66

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    14/18

    Green Page 14

    Appendix C4

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    15/18

    Green Page 15

    Appendix D15-18

    Trial Patient

    Type

    ALA dosage Length

    of study

    Authors Conclusion

    ALADIN I T2DM

    a)100 mg IV

    b)600 mg IV

    c)1200 mg IV

    3 weeksSignificant improvement in TSS (pain,

    numbness, and parathesias)

    ALADIN IIT1DM

    T2DM

    a)600 mg IV x 5 days followed by

    oral LA for 2 years

    b)1200 mg IV x 5 days followed by

    oral LA for 2 years

    2 yearsSignificant improvement in peripheral

    NC

    ALADIN

    IIIT2DM

    LA 600 mg/day IV x 3 weeks

    followed by LA 600 mg PO TID x 6

    months

    7 months

    Trend towards improved neuropathy

    but no statistically significant

    improvement

    SYDNEY IT1DM

    T2DM

    600 mg IV daily 5 days per week

    for 14 treatments3 weeks

    Rapid, significant and clinical

    improvement in TSS (positive

    neuropathic sensory systems)

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    16/18

    Green Page 16

    Appendix E20

    Switching from pathogenetic treatment with alpha-lipoic acid to gabapentin and other analgesics in painful

    diabetic neuropathy: a real-world study in outpatients. Ruessmann H.J.,Journal of Diabetes and Its

    Complications(2009). 23:174-177

    Design Observational studyObjective To evaluate whether switching from the pathogenetic treatment option alpha lipoic acid to drugs

    for symptomatic treatment of neuropathic pain such as gabapentin would be associated with

    changes in efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness.

    Population Cohort of diabetic patients with painful neuropathy from large private practices

    Methods Participants were treated with alpha lipoic acid oral daily dose of 600mg for a mean period

    of 5 years

    After stopping treatment the patients were immediately switched to either:

    o gabapentin 600-2400 mg/day (n= 293 )

    o no treatment due to no acute symptoms (n = 150)

    Responders to gabapentin defined as those who had least moderate pain relief or pain free

    no later than 6 months after starting the treatment and non responders reported either no

    pain relief or slight pain relief at doses up 2400 mg/day

    Responders to ALA defined as those who had symptom relief and showed improved in

    neuropathic deficits and non responders had no symptom relief after 3 weeks of treatment

    Neuropathic symptoms and deficits were assessed using the NSS and NDS

    Results In the untreated group 110 (73%) of patients developed neuropathic symptoms as soon as 2

    weeks after the end of treatment with ALA

    In the gabapentin group:

    o 131 (45%) stopped taking the drug due to intolerable side effects

    o 132 (45%) responded to an average dose of 1200 mg/day

    o 161(55%) were non responders at doses up to 2400 mg/day

    Required further treatment consisting of pregabalin, carbamazepine,

    amitriptyline, tramadol, or morphine in monotherapy or in combination

    Daily cost of ALA was considerably lower than those for gabapentin or drugs used in

    combination

    Responders

    (n)

    Non-Responders

    (n)

    Rate of Side

    Effects

    Frequency of

    outpatient visits

    (per 3 months)

    ALA

    (n= 443)333 110 3% 3.8

    Gabapentin

    (n = 293)132 (45%) 161 (55%) 68% 7.9

    Non

    treatment

    (n =150)

    - 110 (73%) - -

    Authors

    Conclusion

    Switching from long-term treatment with alpha lipoic acid to central analgesic drugs such as

    gabapentin is associated with increased side effects, frequencies of outpatient visits, and

    daily cost of treatment

    Comments Strengths

    Large study population

    Study length was appropriate

    Compared ALA to pharmacologic

    treatment

    Weaknesses

    Observational study

    No inclusion or exclusion criteria listed

    ALA was compared to gabapentin

    however gabapentin is not a first line

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    17/18

    Green Page 17

    Appendix F

    Abbreviations

    ADA- American Diabetes Association

    ALA- alpha lipoic acid

    DSPN- diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy

    HPAL- Hamburg Pain Adjective List

    QOL-quality of life

    NISneuropathy impairment score

    NCS- neuropathic symptoms and change score

    NC- nerve conduction

    NCT-nerve conduction test

    NDS- neuropathy disability score

    QSART- quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test

    ROS- reactive oxygen species

    SFN- small fiber neuropathy

    TSS- total symptom score

    treatment in any of the guidelines for

    diabetic neuropathy

    Gabapentin was not titrated to as high as

    3600 mg/day which was the target dosed

    reached in the only available larger trial

    with gabapentin

  • 8/10/2019 green11-22-13.pdf

    18/18

    Green Page 18

    References

    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2013. Diabetes Care, 36(Supplement 1), S11-S66. doi:

    10.2337/dc13-S011.

    2. Bril V, England J, Franklin GM, Backonja M, Cohen J, Del Toro D, Feldman E, Iverson DJ, Perkins B, Russell JW, Zochodne D. Evidence-

    based guideline: treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy. Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association

    of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology.

    2011 May; 76(20):1758-65.

    3.

    Vinik A. and Casellini C.M. Guidelines in the management of diabetic nerve pain: clinical utility of pregabalin. Diabetes, Metabolic

    Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy. 2013: 6 57-78.

    4. Treede RD, Jensen TS, Campbell JN, et al. Neuropathic pain: redefinition and a grading system for clinical and research purposes.

    Neurology. 2008; 70:16301635.

    5. Tavakoli M., Asghar O., Alam U., et al. Novel insights on diagnosis, cause, and treatment of diabetic neuropathy: focus on painful

    diabetic neuropathy. Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2010; 1(2):69-88.

    6. Green A.Q., Krishnan S., Finucane F.M., Rayman G. Altered C-fiber function as an indicator of early peripheral neuropathy in

    individuals with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care.2010; 33: 174176.

    7.

    Mcllduff C.E., Rutkove S.B. Critical appraisal of the use of alpha lipoic acid (thioctic acid) in the treatment of symptomatic diabetic

    polyneuropathy. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 2011; 377-386.

    8.

    Shay K, Moreau R, Smith E, et al. Alpha-lipoic acid as a dietary supplement: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential.

    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2009; 1790:1149-1160.

    9. Golbidi S., Badran M., and Laher I. Diabetes and alpha lipoic acid. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2011; 2(69):1-15.

    10.

    Low PA, Nickander KK, Tritschler HJ. The roles of oxidative stress and antioxidant treatment in experimental diabetic neuropathy.

    Diabetes.1997;46 (Suppl. 2):S38S42.

    11.

    Tesfaye S, Boulton AJ, Dyck PJ, et al. Diabetic neuropathies: update on definitions, diagnostic criteria, estimation of severity, andtreatments. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:22852293.

    12. Beasner R, Fonseca V., Freeman R. Diabetic Neuropathies: Current Treatment Strategies.

    http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/496605

    13. Page N., DeLuca J.P., Crowell K. What medications are best for diabetic neuropathic pain? The Journal of Family Practice. 2012;

    61(11): 691-694.

    14. Mijnhout G.S., Kollen B.J., Alkhalaf A., et al. Alpha Lipoic Acid for Symptomatic Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients with Diabetes: A

    Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. International Journal of Endocrinology. 2012; 2012.

    15. Ziegler D, Hanefeld M, Ruhnau KJ, et al. Treatment of symptomatic diabetic peripheral neuropathy with the anti-oxidant alpha-lipoic

    acid. A 3-week multicentre randomized controlled trial (ALADIN Study) Diabetologia. 1995;38:14251433.

    16.

    Reljanovic M, Reichel G, Rett K, et al. Treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy with the antioxidant thioctic acid (alpha-lipoic acid): a

    two year multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (ALADIN II). Alpha Lipoic Acid in Diabetic Neuropathy. Free

    Radic Res. 1999;31:171179.

    17.

    Ametov AS, Barinov A, Dyck PJ, et al. SYDNEY Trial Study Group. The sensory symptoms of diabetic polyneuropathy are improved

    with alpha-lipoic acid: the SYDNEY trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:770776.

    18.

    Ziegler D., Hanefeld M., Ruhnau K., et al. Treatment of symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy with the antioxidant alpha-lipoic acid:

    A 7-month multicenter randomized controlled trial (ALADIN III Study). Diabetes Care. 1999; 22:1296-1301.19. Ziegler D., Ametov A., Barinov A., et al.Oral Treatment With alpha-Lipoic Acid Improves Symptomatic Diabetic Polyneuropathy: The

    SYDNEY 2 trial. Diabetes Care. 2006; 29(11):2365-2370.

    20. Ziegler D., Low P.A., Litchy W.J., et al. Efficacy and Safety of Antioxidant Treatment With alpha-Lipoic Acid Over 4 years in Diabetic

    Polyneuropathy: The NATHAN I trial. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34: 2054-2060.

    21. Han T., Bai W.L., and Hu, Y. A systematic review and meta-analysis of alpha-lipoic acid in the treatment of diabetic peripheral

    neuropathy. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2012; 167: 465-471.

    22. Ruhnaut K.J., Meissner H.P., Finn J.R., et al. Effects of 3-week oral treatment with the antioxidant thioctic (alpha-lipoic acid) in

    symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy (ORPIL study)

    Diabetic Medicine. 1999; (16); 1040-1043.

    23. Ruessmann H.J. et al, Switching from pathogenetic treatment with alpha-lipoic acid to gabapentin and other analgesics in painful

    diabetic neuropathy: a real-world study in outpatients. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications2009; 23:174-177.

    24. Tang J, Wingerchuk DM, Crum BA, et al. Alpha-lipoic acid may improve symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy. Neurologist.

    2007;13:164167.

    25.

    Mcllduff C., Rutkove S. Critical appraisal of the use of alpha lipoic acid (thioctic acid) in the treatment of symptomatic diabetic

    polyneuropathy. 2011; 7:377-385.

    26. Sola S, Mir MQ, Cheema FA, Khan-Merchant N, Menon RG, Parthasarathy S, Khan BV. Irbesartan and lipoic acid improve endothelial

    function and reduce markers of inflammation in the metabolic syndrome: results of the Irbesartan and Lipoic Acid in Endothelial

    Dysfunction (ISLAND) study.Circulation.2005;111:3438.

    27.

    Takaoka M, Kobayashi Y, Yuba M, Ohkita M, Matsumura Y. Effects of alpha-lipoic acid on deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt-induced

    hypertension in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 2001;424:1219.

    http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/496605http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/496605http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/496605