28
Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S. EPA-Region 6

Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience

Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory SymposiumAustin, Texas April 15, 2010

James W. YarbroughU.S. EPA-Region 6

Page 2: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Outline

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Mandatory Reporting Rule

Endangerment and cause or contribute to findings

Tailoring Rule

GHG vehicular emissions and Combined Automotive Fleet Economy (CAFE) standards

Renewable Fuel Standard

Geosequestration Regulations

Executive Order 13514

Summarizing: What more may happen in 2010?

Partnerships

Page 3: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

National Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule

Effective January 1, 2010 Requires emitters > 25,000 mt CO2-e per year

and 16 “all-in” source categories to annually report to EPA 6 GHG pollutants

Does not require GHG controls

Page 4: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Background Directed by Congress in 2008 Appropriations Act

Proposal signed March 10, 2009

Public Comment Period (April 10 – June 10, 2009)

Final rule signed September 22, 2009

Published in Federal Register October 30, 2009

Took effect January 1, 2010

Page 5: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Purpose of the Rule

Requires reporting of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from all sectors of the economy in the United States

Provides accurate and timely data to inform future climate change policies and programs

Does not require control of GHG

Page 6: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Key Elements of the Rule Annual reporting of GHG by:

25 source categories 5 types of suppliers of fuel and industrial GHG Motor vehicle and engine suppliers (except light duty

sector)

25,000 metric tons CO2e per year reporting threshold for most sources; capacity-based thresholds where feasible

Monitoring begins January 1, 2010; first reports due March 31, 2011

Direct reporting to EPA electronically EPA verification of emissions data Coming up: FR notices in 2010 on new source categories,

electronic reporting, CBI

Page 7: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

About 10,000 U.S. Facilities Covered

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

636

121

150

167

315

317

425

1108

1502

2551

3000

Other

Iron and Steel

Petroleum Refineries

GHG Suppliers

Petroleum Product Suppliers

Vehicle Manufacturers

Pulp and Paper

Electricity Generation

Natural Gas Suppliers

Landfills

Stationary Combustion

1 3 4 5 5 8 9 13 13 14 1423

41 4555

8089

107107

Page 8: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

What GHGs are Reported? CO2

CH4 (methane)

N2O (nitrous oxide)

Fluorinated GHGs HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons) PFCs (perfluorocarbons) SF6 (sulfur hexafluoride) Other fluorinated gases

Page 9: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Who Reports?

Facility based reporting for all source categories for which there are methods

Limited exceptions for a few reporters (e.g., fuel importers, vehicle and engine manufacturers outside of the light-duty sector)

Page 10: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Source Categories Not Included in Final Rule

EPA plans to further review public comments and other information before deciding on these subparts:

Electronics manufacturing Ethanol production Fluorinated GHG production Food processing Magnesium production Oil and natural gas systems Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) from electrical equipment Underground coal mines Industrial landfills Wastewater treatment Suppliers of coal Geologic sequestration

Facilities with these source categories could be covered by the rule based on GHG emissions from stationary fuel combustion sources.

Page 11: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings

On April 2, 2007, in Massachusetts v. EPA, greenhouse gases are air pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act. Administrator must determine whether or not emissions of

greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution

Administrator signed proposed “Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under the Clean Air Act” April 17, 2009 (published in FR April 24, 2009)

Administrator signed the final findings on December 7, 2009

Final notice appeared in FR December 15, 2009

Final rule was effective January 14, 2010

At least 9 legal challenges to date

Page 12: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Stationary Sources and Proposed PSD and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule December 18, 2008, memo from former Administrator

Johnson February 17, 2009: reconsideration of Johnson memo

but does not take action to stay Johnson memo effectiveness (Administrator Jackson to Sierra Club)

“Tailoring rule” proposed September 30, 2009 Applicability Covers ~70% of the national GHG emissions from

stationary sources 14,000 large sources will require Title V permits (3,000

new) 400 new/modifications will require PSD review (100

new) Tailoring rule to be finalized in April 2010 and effective

January 2011?

Page 13: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Q&A on tailoring rule

Administrator Jackson reply to letter from Sen. Rockefeller and other Senators February 22, 2010

March 3, 2010 New York Times report of Administrator’s comments

Page 14: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

GHG Vehicular Emissions and CAFÉ Standards

Page 15: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Rapid Increase in Transportation Greenhouse Gas Emissions in US

Source: US Emissions Inventory (April 2008) EPA 430-R-08-005

Electricity distributed to other sectors

Page 16: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

GHG (2,193 mmt CO2-eq, 2007)

Rail3%

Cars & Light Trucks

56%

Medium- & Heavy-Duty Trucks

18%

Aviation9%

Nonroad9%

Pipelines2%

Marine3%

INVENTORY OF U.S. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND SINKS: 1990-2007 (April 2009).

U.S. Transportation Sector GHG Emissions

Page 17: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Joint Rulemaking to Establish Vehicle GHG

Emissions and CAFÉ Standards

Establishes Vehicle GHG Emissions and CAFÉ Standards EPA: standards for emissions of greenhouse gases under

the Clean Air Act DOT’s National Highway Traffic and Safety

Administration: standards for fuel economy under EPCA as amended in 2007

Proposal was published September 28, 2009 Comments closed November 27, 2009 This rule was finalized April 1, 2010 Effective January 2011 for MY 2012

Page 18: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Joint Rulemaking

By 2016 the fleet average will be 35.5 miles per gallon, that is four years earlier than the CAFE law now requires. 

Projected reduction in oil consumption of approximately 1.8 billion barrels over the life of the program.

Projected total reduction in GHG emissions of approximately 900 million metric tons.

Incentives for manufacturers to produce flex-fuel vehicles and dedicated alt fuel vehicles.

Page 19: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Renewable Fuels Standard

Energy Independence and Security Act (2005, 2007)

Renewable Fuel Standard 2 in effect July 1, 2010 Biomass-based diesel 1B gal by 2012 Cellulosic biofuel 16B gal by 2022 Advanced biofuel 21B gal by 2022 Renewable biofuel 36B gal by 2022All with % lifecycle GHG thresholds

Page 20: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Geosequestration (GS) Rule July 25, 2008 Proposed rule for Class VI GS wells - extended

comment period closed 12/24/08 and thousands of comments were received

August 31, 2009 Notice of Data Availability (NODA) - comment period ended 10/15/09

Provided an update on ongoing projects and research Requested comments on the use of an injection depth waiver

allowing injection into non-USDW located above the lowermost USDW

Requested an update on current state GS regulation activities April 15, 2010 Projected Final Agency Review (FAR) OMB may request congruent timing and review of Class VI GS

rule and greenhouse gas (GHG) mandatory reporting rule (MRR) to ensure there are no redundant burdens

Page 21: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Executive Order 13514 Affects all federal agencies – “lead by example”

Reduce GHG emissions by Energy conservation Fleet management efficiencies (reduce petroleum use by at least

2% per year through 2020) Renewable energy Inventorying and reporting GHG emissions

Sets new performance requirements Extends water conservation requirements (26% reduction by 2020) Extends high-performance building requirements (by 2020, ensure

that all new federal buildings are designed to achieve zero-net-energy by 2030)

Sets stormwater management guidelines Sets solid waste reduction targets (by 2015, divert at least 50% of

non-hazardous waste)

Page 22: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

What more may happen from a regulatory perspective in 2010?

Page 23: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Possible Graham-Kerry-Lieberman legislation Power plants would face an overall cap on emissions

that would become more stringent over time motor fuel may be subject to a carbon tax whose

proceeds could help electrify the U.S. transportation sector

industrial facilities would be exempted from a cap on emissions for several years before it is phased in.

the legislation would also expand domestic oil and gas drilling offshore and would provide federal assistance for constructing nuclear power plants and carbon sequestration and storage projects at coal-fired utilities.

– “Climate Progress” February 27, 2010

Page 24: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Other related bills

Cantwell-Collins Carbon Limits and Energy for America’s Renewal (CLEAR) Act

Alexander-Webb bill to encourage nuclear power

Alexander-Carper bill to reduce Hg, SO2, NOx from power plants

Page 25: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Some EPA Voluntary Partnerships

Greening the 2010 Cowtown Marathon Fort Worth Texas

Page 26: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Cost per ton of CO2 reduced to replace a coal-fired unit with various technologies

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Gas

Nuclear

Wind

Solar

E-E

Generation cost data (except nuclear) from EPRI (“Generation Technologies in a Carbon-constrained World,” 2005, assuming gas at $6MMbtu)

Page 27: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

“Potential for Energy Efficiency, Demand Response, and Onsite Renewable Energy to Meet Texas's Growing Electricity Needs,” ACEEE, March 2007

Energy Efficiency’s Potential for Texas

Page 28: Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S

Contact Information

Jim Yarbrough

[email protected]

214-665-7232