Group b Presentation 3 Son

8/3/2019 Group b Presentation 3 Son

1/27

SCREENING ALTERNATIVES, FLOWSHEETING,

PLANT LAYOUT AND DETAILED COST ANALYSES

OF BIODIESEL PRODUCTION IN TURKEY

Group B051145003 Glseren Akku

051145011 Berkan Bayar

051145016 ahin alar

051145049 Buket Ylmaz

061145049 Gkhan E. Nar


2/27

What is the aim of the project ?

X Oil Company want to make decision on the contruction of the biodiesel plant

Large Scale Plant

By-product of glycerol evaluation

What was done in this project ?

Market Analysis,Technology Type Selection,

By-product of glycerol evaluation

Main and Auxiliary equipments design,

Piping and Plant Layout,

Detailed Economic Analysis

Preparing a preliminary design for biodiesel production process

Objective of this study is determine manufacturing cost and the capital investement

What was the work in this project?

What was wanted in this project?


3/27

Market Analysis in Turkey

According to the Table, %5 of biodieselrequirement in diesel is 406.525 tons in 2007.

Capacity of biodiesel plant is 27.000 tons/yearin Turkey by research.

Capacity is determined as 40.000 tons/year. It

is 10% of biodiesel market (%5 biodiesel indiesel).


4/27

BIODIESEL PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES

Homogeneous Alkali (Base) Acid Catalyzed

Transesterification

Heterogeneous Acid and Base-Catalyzed

Transesterification

Enzymatic Transesterification

Supercritical Alcohol Transesterification

Microwave Assisted Transesterification

Ultrasound Assisted Transesterification


5/27


6/27


7/27


8/27

0 10

Homogeneous Catalysis Technology

Heterogeneous Catalysis Technology

Enzymatic Catalysis Technology

Supercritical Technology

Selecting Technology Type


9/27

Recommended Block Diagram of SCT

Some Improvments Are Need


10/27

Improved Block Diagram of SCT


11/27

Process Flow Diagram of SCT


12/27

Design Basis


13/27

Material Balance


14/27

Energy Balance


15/27

Result of Material And Energy

Balances

0,04 $ is spending on energy and utilities per a kg of biodiesel

0,43$ is spending on raw materials per 1 kg of product. This isnearly %70 of estimated selling price.

Profitable to go on


16/27

Main Equipments Design

Total =418474 $


17/27

Auxiliary Equipments Design

Total = 735484 $


18/27

Introduction to Plant Layout


19/27


20/27

Piping Design


21/27

Piping Design Results

Electrical Cost(EC) = 0,2784 $/kWh * 340 kW = 94,656 $/h

Total length of pipe segment =580,5 m

Cost of pipe: 580,5* 37,09 = 21530 $

Purchased equipment cost (PEC) =500776,7 $


22/27


Total= 418474 $ Total= 192436 $Total= 668638 $ Total= 53030,35 $/Y

Main Equipments Analysis


23/27


Auxiliary Equipments Analysis

Total= 89943$Total= 1126284 Total= 220669$Total= 735484 $Total= 301633 $


24/27


Utility Cost Analysis

Total=74840000 $


25/27

TPC = 0.567198 $/kg

TCI = 19222476 $FCI = 17300228 $



26/27

Detailed Economic AnalysisProfibility Analysis


27/27

Result of Economic Analysis

Profit is the goal of any investment. When the capacity reachs low ratio, raw material

costs, utility costs will be low, also. But, taxes which is fixed cost can not change. By

the time capacity is low, total income will be low. When total incomes and costs are

calculated for each capacity, breakeven point can be determined which income and cost

is equal to each other.According to depreciation, fixed capital investment and annual net profit, payout

period was calculated as nearly six year. It is good result because the lenght of time is

not long. It s necessary for the total return to equal the capital investment. We

obtained that it is profitable process for 40000 tones/ year capacity at %75 capacity

ratio according to results.

Documents

Group b Presentation 3 Son