Group Work Peer Assessment

Peer Evaluator: Peer Evaluated:

Category 4 = Exceedsthe Standard

3 = Meetsthe Standard

2 = Partially Meetsthe Standard

1=Does Not Meetthe Standard

Score

Research Peer did more thanhis or her fairshare of theresearch.

Peer shared equally andregularly in the research.

Peer contributed to thework, but could havedone a better job.

Peer rarely if evencontributed or madecontributions of littleworth.

Preparation Peer did more thanhis or her fairshare of thepreparation.

Peer shared equally in thepreparation of thepresentation.

Peer contributed to thepreparation, but couldhave done a better job.

Peer rarely if evencontributed or madecontributions of littleworth.

Preparedness Peer preparedexceptionally wellfor thepresentation.

Peer prepared adequatelyfor the presentation.

Peer poorly preparedfor the presentation.

Peer not prepared for thepresentation.

Presentation N/A Peer shared equally indelivering the presentation.

Peer presented too littleor too much to thepresentation.

Peer took overpresentation or did notparticipate in ameaningful fashion.

Duties Peer worked veryhard andcontributedexceptionally well.

Peer regularly carried outassigned or agreed-uponresponsibilities.

Peer carried outassigned or agreed-upon duties most of thetime.

Peer rarely if ever carriedout assigned or agreed-upon duties.

Timeliness N/A Peer completed assignedare agreed-upon tasks ontime.

Peer completed tasksmostly on time, buttasks performed latewere still of value.

Peer completed tasks, butinfrequently on time andtoo late to be of value.

Cooperation N/A Peer cooperated well withthe group process, stayedon task, contributed in ameaningful way to thegroup process.

Cooperated fairly well,but could have beenmore helpful, actionssometimes distractedgroup from work.

Didn’t help much withthe group processes,rather negative, oftenmade group process moredifficult than necessary.

Comments: TOTALSCORE