Upload
aubrey-wiggins
View
236
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Guess Who They are responsible for 1,200 fire bombings, acts of vandalism and physical attacks 9 explosives were planted on a fleet of refrigerated meat lorries They have committed arson and other attacks on shops, bookmakers, factories, dairies, farms and laboratories. The Animal Liberation Front
Citation preview
Guess Who• They chained themselves to railings
• They poured harsh chemicals into mail boxes• They broke windows
• They committed arson attacks at night on unoccupied buildings
Suffragettes
The SuffragettesSuffragettes would have been considered terrorists at the time as they used violence to
achieve their aims, but not in the same way as people view terrorists today.
The key difference is that today’s terrorists acts are carried out by people who do have a vote and are in the democratic process but choose to use violence whereas the suffragettes did
not have the vote and were outside of the democratic process.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16945901
Guess Who• They are responsible for 1,200 fire bombings, acts
of vandalism and physical attacks • 9 explosives were planted on a fleet of refrigerated
meat lorries• They have committed arson and other attacks on
shops, bookmakers, factories, dairies, farms and laboratories.
The Animal Liberation Front
The Animal Liberation Front The Animal Liberation Front say they are a non-violent organisation, however, groups
that commit acts of destruction have associated themselves with the ALF.
They are described by some as a terrorists group, but they argue they are not terrorists because they have never harmed a human being.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/902751.stm
TerrorismLearning Objective: Can it ever be right to use violence and fear to reach a political
objective?
I can give some of the causes of terrorism
I can define the term terrorism
I can evaluate whether it can ever be right to use
violence and fear to reach a political objective
Terrorism Definition
Where groups use violence, or the threat of violence to achieve their aims. They use violence instead of the democratic process (e.g. voting,
peaceful protests).
The violence kills all kinds of people, including ordinary citizens (including children) to create fear – it is indiscriminate.
Keyword - IndiscriminateRandom and unselective
TerrorismLearning Objective: Can it ever be right to use violence and fear to reach a political
objective?
I can give some of the causes of terrorism
I can define the term terrorism
I can evaluate whether it can ever be right to use
violence and fear to reach a political objective
The Last Resort Winston loved his country. It hurt him deeply to see its people oppressed by the Nazi occupiers. But after the German defeat of the British army in the slaughter of Dunkirk, and America’s decision to stay out of the war, it was only a matter of time before Britain became part of the Third Reich.
Now the situation looked hopeless. Hitler faced no international opposition and the British resistance was ill equipped and weak. Many, like Winston, had come to the conclusion that there was no way they could defeat the Germans. But by being a constant source of irritation and forcing them to divert precious resources to crushing the uprising, it was hoped that, sooner or later, Hitler would realise that occupying Britain was more trouble than it was worth and withdraw.
Winston was far from convinced the plan would work, but it was their last resort. The major problem, however, was that it was so difficult to strike in ways which would cause the regime serious problems. That is why they had reluctantly agreed that the only effective and reliable method was for resistance fighters to turn themselves into human bombs, so that their own sacrifices caused the maximum disruption and terror. They were all prepared to die for Britain. They just wanted to make sure their deaths made a difference.
Causes of Terrorism
What causes
terrorism?
People feeling like they are not being treated fairly and
want justice.
Unemployment and money problems.
Religious extremism – misinterpretation
of religious texts
It is the only way they feel they can
get their voice heard.
TerrorismLearning Objective: Can it ever be right to use violence and fear to reach a political
objective?
I can give some of the causes of terrorism
I can define the term terrorism
I can evaluate whether it can ever be right to use
violence and fear to reach a political objective
An example of terrorism – an attack that changed the world
On September 11th 2001, two planes crashed into the World Trade Centre building.
Al Qaeda claimed responsibility.
Al-Qaeda is a fundamentalist Islamist organisation. Its supporters say they want to
get rid of Western - especially American - influence in Muslim countries, and set up an
extreme form of Islamic rule across the world.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMQWzdc175A
An example of terrorism – an attack that changed the world
As a class we are going to read an extract on the September 11th
attack.
Then as a group, you will be discussing the questions in thought
bubbles.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMQWzdc175A
Can it ever be right to use violence and fear to reach a political
objective?Imagine you are at the scene of the 9/11 attack.
A reporter comes up to you and asks:
‘Can is ever be right to use violence and fear to reach a political objective?’ What would you say?
TerrorismLearning Objective: Can it ever be right to use violence and fear to reach a political
objective?
I can give some of the causes of terrorism
I can define the term terrorism
I can evaluate whether it can ever be right to use
violence and fear to reach a political objective