Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MMus(PT) Professional Practice 2 Evaluation Report
Master of Music (Performance Teaching) MUSI90153 Professional Practice 2 PLACEMENT EVALUATION REPORT
Student Name Mentor Organisation
Gary Watling
Paul Carey Rosehill secondary college
Dates of Practicum Dates of Absences
22/3/2013 – 3/6/2013
Guidelines for completing this report form This evaluation should be completed by the mentor/supervisor and returned to the Academic Liaison Officer on or before the due date. The criteria in this report are taken from the National Standards for Teachers issued by the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. During completion of the report, the mentor should assess the student’s level of competency as that of a beginning teacher, in achieving the specified standards. Please indicate next to each standard, the student’s competency level using the ratings scale provided. This report will be moderated in conjunction with the Interim and Observation reports to gain the final practicum grade. Once completed this report should be signed and emailed or posted to: Tracy Galloway, Academic Liaison Officer, Conservatorium of Music, University of Melbourne,
MMus(PT) Professional Practice 2 Evaluation Report
Building 141, Royal Parade, Parkville, Vic 3010 [email protected], Fax: 8344 5346 Please mark the appropriate rank next to each of the standards. Using the ratings scale below, indicate the level of competency achieved by the student during the placement. Ratings Scale:
6 – Exceptional level of competency 3 – Consistent level of competency
5 – Very High level of competency 2 – Satisfactory level of competency
4 – High level of competency 1 – Low level of competency
Standard 1: Know students and how they learn
Level 1.2 Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of research into how students learn and the implications for teaching
5
Level 1.5 Differentiate teaching to meet the specific learning needs of students across the full range of abilities
6
MMus(PT) Professional Practice 2 Evaluation Report
Standard 2: Know the content and how to teach it
Level 2.3 Use curriculum, assessment and reporting knowledge to design learning sequences and learning knowledge
5
Standard 3: Plan for and implement effective teaching and learning
Level 3.1 Set learning goals which provide achievable challenges to students of varying abilities and characteristics
5
Level 3.2 Plan lesson sequences using knowledge of student learning, content and effective teaching strategies.
5
Standard 4:Create and maintain supportive and safe learning environments
Level 4.2 Demonstrate the capacity to organise classroom/group activities and provide clear directions
5
MMus(PT) Professional Practice 2 Evaluation Report
Level 4.3 Demonstrate knowledge of practical approaches to managing challenging behaviour
4
Standard 5: Assess, provide feedback and report on student learning
Level 5.1 Demonstrate an understanding of assessment strategies including informal and formal, diagnostic, formative and summative approaches to assess student learning
5
Standard 6: Engage in professional learning
Level 6.3 Seek and apply constructive feedback from supervisors and teachers to improve teaching practices
5
Standard 7: Engage professionally with colleagues, parents/carers and the community
Level 7.2 Understand the relevant legislative, administrative, organisational policies and processes required for teachers according to school stage.
4
MMus(PT) Professional Practice 2 Evaluation Report
Comment on student’s key strengths throughout the placement: Gary maintained a positive attitude through the placement at times through challenging conditions. Gary established a good rapport with the students and this enabled him to produce positive outcomes. Gary is acutely aware of the difficulties and limitations of younger guitar students, and he showed great empathy towards these students whilst providing clear and achievable short term goals. Gary established a good knowledge of students’ strengths and weaknesses and was able to consolidate in these areas. Gary had good lesson plans that were achievable and worked for many students.
Comment on areas for further development:
Further development of coping with multiple skill levels simultaneously. More planning for larger ensemble situations.
MMus(PT) Professional Practice 2 Evaluation Report
Mentor Signature: __Paul Carey_________________________________ Date: 12/6/2013___________
*This report will contribute to the overall professional placement grade.
