14
Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications Doubra Charles Ambaiowei, Ph.D. Technical Director Ontario Asphalt Pavement Council (OAPC) Ontario Road Builders’ Association (ORBA)

Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Doubra Charles Ambaiowei, Ph.D.Technical Director

Ontario Asphalt Pavement Council (OAPC)Ontario Road Builders’ Association (ORBA)

Page 2: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Presentation Outline

o Recap: Present Concerns and Solution

o Why Harmonize?

o Evaluation Focus

o Conclusion

o Next Steps

Page 3: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Recap: Present Concerns

Page 4: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Recap: Solutions

Page 5: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Why Harmonize?

Page 6: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Evaluation Focus

Mix DesignMarshall

SuperpaveSMAWMA

RAP USAGEAllowed

RAP PercentageSurface/Binder

PGAC SpecificationPG 58-28

PMADENT/EXBBR

MSCRRecovered PGAC

HMA Acceptance CriteriaAC ContentGradation

Compaction

Tack Coat SpecificationTypes

Application Practices

Page 7: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Evaluation Focus: Mix Design

Consensus Requirements:o Increasing Asphalt Cement Content

o Use of Recycled Material

o Mixing and Compaction Temperatures

o Production Technologies

o Use of Additives

o Proportioning Mineral Fillers

o Use of Distinct Specifications - WMA

Page 8: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Evaluation Focus: RAP Usage

Concerns:o Premature Cracking

o Limitations to RAP Use

o Additional Test Requirements

o Environmental & Economic Consequences

Page 9: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Evaluation Focus: PGAC Specifications

Concerns:o Acceptance and Rejectable Criteria

o Inconsistencies with Test Procedures

o AC/Binder Literacy

Page 10: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Evaluation Focus: HMA Acceptance Criteria

Concerns:o Need for Adequate QC/QA Practices

o Sampling Methods

o Acceptance Plans

o Imposed Penalties on Non-conformance

Page 11: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Evaluation Focus: Tack Coat Specification

Current Types:o SS-1 Emulsified Asphalt

o SS-1 H

o MS-1

Application Practices:o Milled Surfaces

o Padded Surfaces

o Paved Surfaces

Page 12: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Conclusion

The goal of harmonization is to eliminate specification proliferation.

o Selecting Criteria Impacting on Mix Volumetrics and Density Requirements

o Rationale for Selecting Test Procedures, Setting Criteria and Limits

o Personnel Training

o Strong Commitment from ALL Stakeholders

o Timely Communication of Construction Notices

o General Compliance with Latest OPSS Specifications

Page 13: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

Next Steps

o Engage with Specifiers on Ways to Achieve Durable HMA Pavements:

➢ Discuss to Better Understand These Specifications

o Encourage the NEED to Harmonize Specifications

Page 14: Harmonizing Ontario’s HMA Specifications

THANK YOU FOR LISTENING