Upload
trandat
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HAURAKI SCHOOL
ANNUAL REPORT 2015
Part 1 – Strategic and Non-Strategic Report
Part 2 – National Standards
Part 3– Analysis of Variance
Part 4 – ELLP Progressions
Introduction:
The school opened on 2 February 2015 with 403 students compared with 418 students at the beginning of 2014,
396 in 2013, 384 students at the beginning of 2012, and 370 at the beginning of 2011, 362 at the start of 2010, 338
at the beginning of 2009, and 328 at the beginning of 2008. 2015 started with 16 classes, seven in the Junior School
and five in the Middle and four in the Senior School. Class sizes varied throughout the year depending on the
number transitioning in and out of the school at any one time, but the maximum was 26 in the Junior School, 30 in
the Middle School, and 32 in the Senior School. A third new entrant class opened at the start of term 3, and a fourth
new class was started at the beginning of term 4. The roll grew steadily during the year and we finished on the 15
December with 469 students, compared with 451 students at the end of 2014, 459 students at the end of 2013, 440
at the end of 2012, 438 at the end of 2011, and 410 at the end of 2010.
It is with pleasure that I present my 2015 Annual Report. Progress against objectives outlined in the Strategic
Annual Plan, Non-Strategic Annual Plan, and Target Action Plan are reported against for the school community,
Board of Trustees and Ministry of Education. Five Strategic Aims provide a framework for this report.
PART 1 –STRATEGIC AND NON-STRATEGIC ANNUAL
REPORT 2015
Strategic Aim 1: All teachers are able to deliver the National Curriculum so students can achieve to the best of their ability. Goals as per Annual Plan Actions/Outcome Evaluation
1.1 All students are able to access
the N.Z. Curriculum evidenced
by the quality of programmes
being delivered and progress
and achievement data.
1.2 Focus on deep learning and in
particular continue to strengthen
the teaching of models for
learning in particular AFL and
SOLO taxonomy.
All classes followed timetables that were developed collaboratively within each
syndicate as well as across the school to ensure a balance of academic, cultural
and sporting opportunities was provided. Generally the mornings were dedicated
to literacy and numeracy, and inquiry took place in the afternoons. Physical
education and the Arts took place as much as possible in the afternoons also with
most cultural activities scheduled before school or at lunch times. Timetabling
ensured that for any one year level, reading, writing and maths took place at the
same time so that children who were withdrawn for additional support or
extension purposes were not being disadvantaged by missing out on something
else.
Triennial curriculum reviews were carried out over the course of the year by
curriculum leaders for each of Science and Writing. For each of these, the
process included reviewing quality of teaching, quality of learning, quality of
resourcing and making recommendations. Findings were presented to staff and
board. Copies of these reviews are on the Hauraki on line site, and also in a
master curriculum review folder. Other curriculum reviews scheduled for visual
art and dance/drama did not take place but are to be rescheduled for 2016.
Displaying learning intentions and success criteria as part of daily teaching and
learning featured in most classrooms and students are normally able to refer to
these when asked what they are learning.
Term and weekly planning continued to be of a high standard overall although
continuing to review these especially at some levels and in some curriculum area
will be a priority. Teachers continue to find aligning student goals to these
challenging particularly for reading and maths.
Self and peer assessment occurs often using rubrics but the success of this
varies.
Timetabling that is aligned has worked well
and must continue to be a priority.
Consider using teacher aides in classrooms
more to assist children rather than
withdrawing them is to be considered in
2016.
Updated curriculum reviews have provided
future direction for continuing
improvement. Some recommendations
resulted in immediate changes while others
will become part of future annual or
strategic plans.
Continued revisiting of AFL generally is
needed with a number of new staff on
board.
Spelling/word study planning to be a focus
for 2016.
Teaching of inquiry to be a school wide
focus.
1.3 The School Scheme reflects
current practices.
1.4 Student inquiry encourages
ownership of learning for
students.
1.5 Strengthen provision for
teaching of te reo and tikanga.
Quality and quantity of feed back varies across the school.
Providing students with goals for reading, writing and maths that they then
select from has proved worthwhile for assisting children to have greater
ownership of their learning. When teachers integrate student goal setting with
their teaching of a particular concept children demonstrate greater ownership
and are able to articulate the goal they are working on at any one time. In many
classes students have personal goals as well as curriculum goals.
SOLO taxonomy continued to be an important model of learning in 2015. Staff
meetings were held to develop teacher competence with the implementation of
SOLO. It proved to be a powerful self assessment tool when used consistently
by teachers and supported by resources for students to refer to. It was most often
used as part of inquiry learning and self assessment rubrics using SOLO were
commonly used. It was great to see children and teachers co-constructing rubrics
together in some classrooms. Teacher inquiry planning was formatted using
SOLO to ensure deep learning.
Staff provided examples of SOLO they had used in their classrooms that
contributed to a presentation for a visiting school to see how SOLO is
implemented in our classrooms.
An addition to the school’s mission statement was made to include the words ‘ ..
and be contributing citizens within their community as a result of community
consultation.
Alterations were made to the School Scheme to reflect curriculum changes that
included the following sections: Student Goal Setting, Mid-Year Reading,
Writing and Maths Assessment Guidelines, Teacher Inquiry, New Entrant
Assessments and Report Writing Guidelines.
Spelling progressions for levels 1 and 2 (years 1-4) that provide greater direction
for the teaching of spelling were also added to the Scheme.
PAT Spelling/Grammar test was administered to year 5/6 students that assisted
with identifying strengths and weaknesses.
Handwriting progressions were revised to provide greater direction for teachers
and ensure consistency across the school. These are included in the School
Scheme.
A planned review of inquiry topics in the School Scheme was postponed. No
specific professional development opportunities were provided for staff in this
area. Teachers generally followed guidelines outlined in the Scheme. This was
largely teacher directed throughout the school and depth of learning that resulted
varied across the school.
Two Maori language assistants employed as part of the tuatahi programme
Set down expectations for the amount of
written work in exercise books during year
6 classes.
Feed back and feed forward continues to be
an area of focus.
Guidelines for goal setting are to be revised
with a number of new staff on board.
Continue to revise goal sheets.
Continue to look for opportunities to
integrate SOLO.
Revisit SOLO to ensure all staff including
new ones, have common understanding.
Level 3 spelling progressions to be
developed.
Use this data so that its findings help
determine future plans.
Identified as a staff development focus in
2016.
Participation in the te reo tuatahi
programme is to continue in 2016.
1.6 Review ESOL programme.
1.7 Health and P.E. programmes
currently being taught reflect
the needs of students and our
community.
1.8 The provision of a range of
cultural and sporting
opportunities for students is
given priority.
taught year 5/6 once a week throughout the year. The programme was oral based
with a focus on pronounciation and conversational Maori.
They also taught junior kapa haka.
With new staff in this area, the focus was on upskilling the newly appointed
teacher . ELLP matrices continued to be used for tracking and monitoring
progress with success.
We became an official travelwise school and provided a number of opportunities
for students to engage in, such as KOS.
The Walking School Bus increased its number of routes form one to three in the
latter part of the year.
Healthy eating practices continued to be encouraged with the sushi and pita
lunches provided most weeks.
Occasional sausage sizzles provided by the PTA as a treat also proved popular.
The Arts continued to feature strongly in the school. A music specialist
provided music lessons for most classes school wide throughout the year. In
addition to timetabled lessons, a number of additional opportunities were
provided.
A Middle and Senior Choir practised weekly and were given opportunities to
perform at school publicly but also in the community. The seniors, for example,
performed at the local lifestyle village and the middles at a Kids for Kids
concert.
A year 5 and a year 6 orchestral group were led by music specialist, Mr Tony
Ramsay and they along with a rock band also practised weekly and performed to
audiences.
A marimba group for year 4 children led by Miss Rebekah Waller also featured.
Dance classes were taught during lunch times to varying groups over the course
of the year by outside expert, Miss Jane Carter. Groups performed at the
Peninsula Dance Festival.
A school wide arts festival involved music, dance drama, and a piece of art by
every child was on display. This event was performed twice to the parent
community on to occasions. A number of pieces of art were also exhibited at the
peninsula arts festival held at Stanley Bay School.
A Junior Christmas concert featured an item by each of the nine classes and
proved to be a memorable experience for children and parents.
A Maori cultural group of approximately 30 interested children practised
singing and actions each week under the direction of Mr Garry Pratt and Mrs
Sue Malone. They performed admirably in public on a number of occasions
Carry over planned 2015 actions to 2016.
Continue to further develop the walking
school bus if possible.
1.9 Environmental sustainability is
encouraged.
1.10 Values teaching which
reflects the school’s underlying
philosophy is built on.
including the Onepoto Festival.
A Junior kapa haka also practised weekly under the direction of tuatahi language
assistants.
As in previous years the waterwise programme continued at Narrow Neck beach
for year 6 students and we are grateful to the willing group of parent instructors
who assisted. All year 6 students participated on a fortnightly basis in terms 1
and 4 and as usual this proved to be a popular component of the school
programme. They learned to sail and kayak.
Gymnastics featured again this year that involved 30 students thanks to Ms
Nikki White and Miss Madeleine Langley. Teams competed in the North Shore
Primary Schools’ Competition with success.
Ten children competed in the Mt Ruapehu primary schools ski competition over
the course of a week in August under the direction of parent and board member
Mr Chris Bonham.
Twelve netball, three basket ball, and four hockey teams represented the school
on a weekly basis outside school hours and achieved a number of worthwhile
results. Senior children, in particular, were encouraged to take part in at least one
representative sport. I am grateful to Mr Christopher Pipes, Miss Melanie
Rickard and Mrs Donna Golightly for their organisation of these teams. Twilight
netball, summer hockey and touch rugby featured during term 4 as well. Support
from parents as coaches, managers and/or referees was also much appreciated.
Also, there were two rugby teams thanks to Mr Michael Hebden who was ably
supported by parents. Four soccer teams were organised by Mr Pipes and
competed with success. Two cricket teams that played two inter-school matches
were organised by Mrs Franklin.
Sports Days were held school wide for each of swimming, athletics, and cross
country and many parents attended these events. Children who excelled in each
of these participated in inter-school events and again it was a very successful
year for Hauraki School with a number of our athletes taking the top placings.
Kiwi Sport funding of $5968.82 was spent on providing all students with the
opportunity to participate in snag golf and also contributed towards the cost of
implementing the Cracker Jacks organised by Quantum Sport. This programme
has built on the values philosophy that underpins our school in the area of sport.
The school gardens have thrived under the direction of Mrs Sandra Winder and a
group of interested students.
The teaching of values continued by focussing on one per term and during 2015
Hauora, Accountability, Kindness and Integrity were integrated into daily school
1.11 Further develop the
integration of IT across the
school to maximise teaching
and learning opportunities.
life, assemblies and as well in the classroom and playground. Recipients of
certificates were acknowledged on our values tree in the foyer. Most teachers
showed a high level of support for the teaching of these by following up in
classrooms with a variety of activities and some were shared at assemblies.
The Cracker Jacks programme was the subject of several staff meetings and
introduced as a way of strengthening our values philosophy in P.E. programmes.
Once again all year 6 students were encouraged to develop leadership skills with
the launch of a ‘Leadership Day’ facilitated by ex- Board Chairperson, Mr
David Hansen. This involved exploring the leadership concept, a range of team
building exercises, and listening to inspirational Takapuna Grammar student
leaders.
The election of house and deputy house captains also took place at the beginning
of the year and they were given a number of specific responsibilities during the
year. Also there were library, computer, road patrol, P.E. shed, lunch and office
monitors.
The integration of IT into learning continued to develop in 2015 across the
school. Specialist staff assisted with this up to three days a week.
There was an expectation that all staff would update their class pages weekly
and most adhered to this.
A new site for staff planning was set up within our google domain for teacher
planning and all staff over time were upskilled in the use of google docs. All
planning has now been converted to google docs.
All classes from rooms 1-13 were set up with a class email which meant their
students could use google docs rather than word for any online writing. Folders
were set up by Donna inside each class account for those who wanted them.
IT teachers provided some support in classrooms for teachers but this was
limited. A successful development has been the use of ipads for recording
students’ thinking so that the teacher and children can reflect back.
Ipads in junior rooms were all set up with the same apps to ensure consistency.
The selection of apps that can be easily exported or saved has been important.
Saving straight into google drive has simplified the whole process.
Active boards continue to be used in all rooms but maximising their potential by
taking advantage of the interactive nature of them is limited. Due to age some
projectors and bulbs are going to need replacing before long.
Tumbles for reading and maths particularly have been well used but the use of
apps to support the learning effectively is an on going area for development. The
idea of voice recording has been seen as useful by some teachers.
The middle school has become more proficient with the use of google docs.
Students can access the class account, open the folder and create a document as
On going encouragement will be needed for
this to be sustained.
Providing all year 6 students with a
responsibility meant some students needed
close monitoring to ensure they carried out
their duties.
Organisation of material on class pages is
to be a 2016 focus.
Ensure planning is uploaded to the Hauraki
site.
This made it a lot easier to organise and
access work efficiently.
Linking this expectation to appraisal has
given strength to the teacher inquiry
process.
Saving straight into google drive has been a
great step forward but teachers need to
ensure that updates are completed regularly.
Focus on being able to select the most
appropriate app for a given purpose.
Next step is to develop tools like inserting
and editing an image and use the wrap tool.
Staff and student training needed at
beginning of 2016 for use of Access-It.
1.12 The information centre
provides improved accessibility
to resources that support
teaching and learning.
1.13 Review homework across
the school to ensure
consistency.
1.13 Teacher inquiry practices
strengthen the link between
evidence and practice.
1.14 Teacher and student
assessment practices and recording
across the curriculum are consistent.
1.15 New opportunities for learning
are considered outside of school
hours.
well as use the basic text tools.
The BYOD year 6 classes became very independent with google docs, google
slides, tables, and to a certain extent google drawings. Sharing students’ learning
with parents has been appreciated by them.
A record of all digital equipment is kept and has been updated. Fourteen chrome
books were purchased and successfully trialled in the senior classes. The lease of
four teacher laptops was renewed and we purchased the old laptops for
classroom use.
Maintenance of equipment has been on going. A new server was investigated at
the end of the year as this needs replacing.
After research took place a decision was made to replace the existing
Athenaeum library system to Access-It a much more modern and user friendly
system that is cloud based. The sum of $8175 included a library software
package, licence fees, data migration from the old system, training programme
for staff, cloud hosting, barcode scanner, and travel estimate.
Regular weekly homework was provided by each class and this was generally
consistent within each syndicate. It was expected that homework reflected
current teaching and mostly focused on reading, spelling and maths.
Each class teacher selected a group of 6-8 target students who were not
receiving help from any specialist teacher to particularly focus on. This involved
regularly identifying what the students needed to learn next, strategies needed to
achieve these, and recording how the teaching practice changed to meet the
needs. Many pleasing gains were noted.
Each teacher was provided with a term planning, assessment and weekly
planning folder as well as an updated copy of the School Scheme.
Assessment sheets were reviewed. On going review of the assessment folder and
what is recorded in is on going.
All teacher assessment sheets were set up to align with planning and student
goal sheets for each syndicate.
Pre and post tests were conducted for each of the maths strands for year 4-6
students.
Kelly Sports taught a skills based programme once a week after school for part
of the year and a popular lego club was also offered each week Friday after
school.
Small groups and individual tuition was provided throughout the year in our
Blinds requested for rooms 5-8 as difficult
to see the board.
Need to look at homework across
syndicates to ensure that the amount is
progressive and that it is a reinforcement of
what is taught in the classrooms.
Teachers need to be more specific with
making comments ensuring that they are at
the heart of learning.
Students were aware of their goals and their
ability to reflect was best where teachers
actively encouraged and guided students
regularly. Putting time aside specifically for
this purpose proved worthwhile.
Having goals provided that coincided with
student needs made the process of
reflection and identifying next learning
steps much clearer for students. They are to
be implemented school wide in 2014 for
reading, writing and maths.
Music Centre for students learning a range of instruments.
French was taught weekly after school on a Friday to a small group of
committed students.
Chinese was taught to a group of approximately 15 students for part of the year.
The lego club run by a school family that was held each Friday after school
proved popular for many children.
Strategic Aim 2: Assessment practices that better inform student achievement and next learning steps in relation to National Standards.
2.1 -2.7 Refer to Part 3 of this document: NAG 2A (B) and (C) including the Analysis of Variance for all details of National Standards reporting.
2.8 Special needs students are
supported so that they progress to the
best of their ability.
• The Registers for Special Needs and Gifted and Talented continued to be updated
at least twice during the year.
• For the first time small groups of year 3 and year 4 students needing additional
support were withdrawn from their classes separately for each of writing and
maths and taught by specialist teacher, Mrs Kerry Clark four days a week. This
extra help continued for year 5 and 6 students taught by Mrs Christine Dean. These
groups have allowed children to work at a slower pace in order to consolidate their
learning. Details of progress made for students is included in the Analysis of
Variance Report.
• Thirteen children went through the reading recovery programme with Mrs Carolyn
Jones and four will be carried in into 2016. Three were referred ion to RT Lits as
they were discontinued successfully from reading recovery but further support was
needed as they struggled to read unseen text independently.
• Using Quick 60 Resource and school readers Mrs Jones worked with 35 children
over the course of the year. All of these children have achieved national Standard
except four who were then taken into reading recovery.
• Using the Alpha to Omega format Mrs Jones took spelling groups of year 3 and 4
students involving 30 children. The focus was on learning spelling rules, and ways
to remember common sounds. Four children from this group displayed dyslexic
tendencies and were taken individually for a dyslexic based programme.
• The Stareway to Spelling programme was provided for one student who completed
it successfully.
• Rainbow Reading supported a number of year 6 students for three terms by
providing reading mileage and fluency and increased ability to comprehend more
complex material.
• Steps to Literacy programme, a computer driven intervention combined with
teacher instruction focused on four children, two taught by Mrs Carolyn Jones and
two by Mars Kerry Clark. All four have made significant progress.
• A Maths knowledge recovery programme was taken by a teacher aide that focused
quick basic facts recall. 29 year 4 and 5 students and some year 6’s were part of
Up to date registers were achieved.
Learning to transfer what they know is a
focus for these children as they gain
confidence in themselves and their ability.
Increased confidence for students noted.
Virtually all made progress in each of
writing and maths with a few achieving
National Standard. See Anaylsis of
Variance report.
These students remain fragile and and will
need to maintain a consistent effort in order
to spell correctly. The dyslexic based
programme is to continue in 2016.
This is to continue in 2016 and training for
teacher aides by RTLB has been organised.
Increased confidence with reading for all
students.
2.9 Challenging programmes and
different opportunities for students
achieving above National Standard
are provided.
2.10 Comply with Ministry reporting
and legal requirements.
this and all have made at least some progress.
• A phonological awareness and phonetic awareness group for year 1 and 2 students
helped to consolidate sounds needed to attempt unknown words in writing and
reading. It has been very beneficial for the reading recovery children.
• Fine motor groups for year 1 and 2 students practised formation, size, and
placement of letters so that writing can become automatic thereby allowing
children to focus on the cognitive task of writing their ideas. It has been a slow
process but the children have done well with this intervention. Some gross motor
strength work was built into the programme as some of these students had
difficulty with core strength, posture and finger strength.
• Special needs programmes were also supported by a number of outside agencies
including Ministry group education personnel, speech language therapists,
Outreach Service, RTLBs, and RT Lits.
• All new entrants and year 1 students took part in a perceptual motor programme
for half an hour daily to help fine and gross motor development. Sufficient help to
run the programme was an ongoing issue.
• Extension maths classes were held daily for each of year 4, 5 and 6 maths students.
These coincided with maths time in their mainstream classes.
• Extension writing took place daily for able year 6 students.
• Future problem solving was a focus for a group of senior students.
• Extension opportunities in science were provided also for middle school students.
The following policies were reviewed and adopted by the board:
• Health and Safety
• Drugs and Alcohol
• Crisis Management
• Copyright
• Cycling
• Non-Custodial Access
• Theft and Fraud
• Community Consultation
• Teacher Induction
• Homework
• Stand-down, Suspension, Exclusion and Expulsion
• PTA
• EEO
• Units
• Curriculum delivery
• New Entrants’ Evaluation
• Finance
Programme organisation to be changed to
avoid cancellation by timetabling two
teacher aides for each session.
Maintain this gross motor component as
part of this programme.
These programmes all ran successfully and
had the effect of reducing the size of
mainstream classes.
Policies are kept on to the Hauraki website
as they are reviewed and a master copy
only is held by the principal.
.
• No new policies were introduced.
• Prepared a 2015 Charter that included Mission statement, Values, Vision,
statements on cultural diversity, Maori dimension, community expectations, and
Principles, Strategic Plan 2015 – 2017, Annual Plan 2015, and an action plan for
target groups.
• This 2015 Annual Report that included the following was completed for the Board
and MOE. It included a:
• Strategic Annual Plan report
• Non-Strategic Annual Plan report
• School-level student achievement data has been analysed in relation to National
Standards. (Nag 2Ab). It identified:
• school strengths and weaknesses
• basis for identifying areas for improvement
• planned actions for lifting achievement See attached.
• A report in relation to National Standards provided incite into student progress and
achievement including Maori, Pasifika and Gender. (Nag 2Ac). See attached.
• Analysis of Variance. See attached.
• The school was open for instruction for the required 388 half days.
• Compliance with the Code of Practice for International Students took place during
the year and this was formally reported on once during the year. Four international
students attended during the year.
Develop a policy for storage and disposal
of staff property in 2016.
The 2015 School Charter was approved by
the Ministry.
Reports have provided clear direction for
identifying school wide strengths and
weaknesses.
Target groups were able to be easily
identified using 2014 data.
The ESOL target group was reported on
using the new ELLP MOE template and
included as part of the Analysis of Variance
for the first time.
Communication was received from the
Ministry acknowledging our compliance.
Strategic Aim 3: Personnel: All staff support students to maximise their potential in a positive, motivating and challenging learning environment.
3.1 Reduction of class sizes is a
focus.
An additional staff member was employed four mornings a week to teach
writing and maths to small groups of students in year 5 and 6. This was in
addition to another staff member who taught writing and maths to small groups
in year 3 and 4, as well as a specialist teacher who taught the gifted and talented
maths programmes for years 4-6 run on a daily basis. This same teacher also
provided some assistance with the teaching of specific inquiry programmes.
These additional staff have had the effect of reducing the class sizes during
writing and maths times particularly that has benefitted class teachers and
Reduced class sizes for writing and maths
highlights the importance of careful
timetabling so that all one year level has
maths or writing at the same time.
3.2 Consider appointment of staff
that ensures strength across the
curriculum.
3.3 A refined appraisal process that
is closely aligned to effective teacher
inquiry.
3.4 Provision of professional
development that coincides with
identified needs.
3.5 Liaison with other local schools
remaining students.
Staff with strengths in Maori, Visual Art, Dance, Drama, Inquiry and Sport
have been appointed for 2016 that will enable the leadership of these areas to
progress.
Staff appraisals were carried out for all teachers by appraisers, either syndicate
leaders or the principal. Teacher registration criteria and interim professional
standards were used as a basis for this. Each teacher was provided with a
performance appraisal document, and a schedule was followed throughout the
year. Individual developmental goals as well as whole staff development goals
were incorporated into this. In addition each teacher selected an inquiry
question to pursue that was self selected. Most chose an aspect of maths that
coincided with our professional development focus, Whole staff development
emerged from trends in student data and teacher inquiry.
Maths was the major professional development focus for the year under the
guidance of outside facilitator, Lucie Cheesman. Several staff meetings were
held that focused on development of content knowledge for the teaching of
fractions, place value, multiplication thinking and developing mathematical
discourse particularly. All staff got to observe Lucie teach two lessons over the
course of the year that staff appreciated and found useful for enhancing their
own practice.
We also participated in a Ministry contract for Maori that involved a facilitator
visiting the school on three occasions. The focus was on utilising Te Aho
Arataki Marau effectively, gathering Maori achievement data, providing
effective teaching and learning methodologies with the aim of increasing the
use of te reo in classrooms and wider school environment.
Google docs was introduced and used by teachers for planning and setting up of
class pages.
A range of other staff development took place that included ensuring staff had a
sound understanding of all requirements set out in the Scheme document and
administration of tests.
Senior staff attended a Joy Allcock spelling session, and two staff attended the
Writers Conference, both of which were helpful with developing our School
Scheme.
Other professional development related to individual needs identified through
the appraisal process.
Participation with other local schools for enhancing writing and in particular
achieving consistency with the assessment and moderation of this was a goal
It is recommended that teacher inquiry,
student inquiry, Maths teaching, AFL and
SOLO continue to be an integral part of
appraisal documents in 2016.
Recommended that teachers continue with
the same inquiry question if they feel more
time to explore this would be of benefit.
Continued revision of Scheme requirements
needed that reflected professional
development upskilling.
Some impact was made on improving the
teaching of te reo but unfortunately this
contract was not completed because of the
facilitator leaving.
for the purpose of professional
learning is encouraged.
3.6 Commitment to EEO
and this was largely achieved.
There has been some pressure applied by local schools for us to join a
community of schools as past of the IES government initiative. This has been
considered but at this stage we can see no benefit for Hauraki to be part of this.
EEO guidelines were followed with the appointment process and all aspects of
school life.
Teaching staff were provided with their classroom release entitlement. This was
mainly provided during music time when classes were taught by specialist
Music teacher, Mr Tony Ramsay. Additional time was allocated in terms 2 and
4 for testing and report writing.
Mrs Rachel McIver left at the end of term 2 and was replaced by Mrs Kate
Green. Mrs Hannah Ross-Thompson went on maternity leave in early
November and Mrs Emma Mackintosh taught three days a week for the
remainder of the year.
Mrs Andrietta Smal opened a class of new entrants at the beginning of term 3,
and Mrs Meredyth McFarlane opened a new class at the beginning of term 4.
Each appointment process followed guidelines set down in the ‘Appointments’
and ‘EEO’ Policies.
Equal employment considerations are reflected in a number of current policies,
for example, EEO, and Staff Appraisal. Once again over the past year we have
consistently aimed to achieve a very positive work environment for staff where
job security and self worth are valued. The staff is formally supported in their
professional duties through regular whole staff meetings, syndicate meetings
and the appraisal system.
All teacher staff were provided with
classroom release entitlement but additional
time over and above CRT was also
provided for testing purposes.
Our values based culture is evident with
staff as well as students. A high level of
collaboration and professionalism is evident
in all aspects of school life.
Strategic Aim 4: Community Engagement: A culture where a strong home and school partnership prevails.
4.1 Consult regularly with the
school community.
4.2 Enhanced communication with
At the beginning of 2015 a new triennial strategic plan was developed based on
a community survey as well as board and staff feed back that is available on the
school’s web site. A summary of community consultation findings as part of
this planning process was presented at the Meet the Teacher evening in
February. Overall a high level of satisfaction with the school was evident.
As part of the survey parents were invited to comment on our health
programmes, a two yearly requirement.
A Maori hui took place one evening earlier in April that was attended by
seventeen members of the school community. This included a presentation of
Consultation provided some good strategic
direction for future spending and a number
of suggestions were incorporated into the
new plan.
Changes were made to some food items
provided for sausage sizzles.
parent community to ensure
greater transparency by board
and school.
4.3 Increased parental
participation is to be
encouraged.
achievement data and what we do for students as Maori at Hauraki followed by a
question and answer session and food. We were fortunate that the facilitator for
our Ministry Maori contract was able to attend and lead the group in a karakia as
well as make valuable contributions to discussion.
Parents of senior students using devices were invited to feed back and overall
there is sound support for the use of these. A presentation was also made by Mrs
Donna Golightly to parents of year 5 students who are to be in digital classrooms
in 2016.
A Hauraki School face book page was set up and is managed by Donna
Golightly. This has provided another avenue of communication that is
appreciated by parents.
Regular formal communication with the parent community took place
throughout the year. In week 2 of the school year all parents were given the
opportunity to listen to their child’s teacher about programmes and expectations
for the year, then in week 4 a ten minute interview slot was provided for each
parent and teacher to discuss progress to date. At the end of term 1 students
shared their work for the term with parents. At the end of term 2 a written report
for reading, writing and maths was provided followed by a parent interview. At
the end of term 3 children shared their term 3 inquiry, and at the end of term 4 a
written report covering all curriculum areas was provided.
A communication section at the top of weekly homework sheets has been
appreciated by parents.
Being able to refer to the Hauraki site for daily notices and also class blogs has
increased our avenues for communication with parents.
Rostered parent help in classrooms has been appreciated by teachers.
Open Days were held in each of terms 1, 2 and 3 for prospective parents and
their children. Regular visits were made to each of the contributing preschools.
The insert section of the school prospectus was updated at the beginning of the
year.
Sharing assemblies were well received by parents.
A 2015 Year Book was produced that all students contributed to.
A successful end of the year assembly enabled children to display their singing
and performance skills. The total number of special presentations was thirty
four. All year 6 students were presented with a leaving certificate and those who
received trophies also received a medal with their name engraved on it for
keepsake.
Enrolment form is still to be reviewed to incorporate a section on how new
parents might contribute to the life of the school.
The opportunity for parents to hear about
proposed programmes, how devices are to
be used and answer questions was well
received by parents.
This sequence of formal reporting worked
well and provided good balance. Continue
to review written reports we provide.
Review enrolment pack and enrolment
form for 2016.
An updated prospectus is recommended in
2016.
Need to ensure all main school events are
recorded in the year book. Some formatting
issues to be addressed in 2016
4.4 An updated web site that
provides increased
information.
Greater exposure in local
newspapers to reflect school events
and achievements is to be
encouraged.
.
The current web site was given a fresh new look at the beginning of 2015. New
photos were included and tabs added that made for easier access. The sports
section was developed to include codes of conduct for the various codes. An A-
Z directory provided answers to frequently asked questions. All other pages
were updated to reflect current practices and in some cases more information
added.
Little effort was made to reflect school events and achievements in local papers.
The new web site was well received by the
community with many positive comments
received.
A dedicated person is needed for this
purpose.
Strategic Aim 5: School Finance and Property: Provision of a physically and emotionally safe as well as purposeful and attractive environment that enhances
students achievement and sense of community.
5.1 Upgrade pergola area.
5.2 Classroom capacity that reflects
flexible learning environments is to
be increased over the next few
years.
5.3 Explore possibility of
incorporating some surrounding
land into the school grounds.
5.4 Upgrade and extension of
playgrounds to be considered.
• A combination of government grants, parent donations, international student fees,
and the P.T.A. financed the school’s operations in 2015. Because of increased roll
growth that brought increased staffing the Board needed to contribute a very small
amount only to staff salaries. Significant expenses however, included curriculum
expenses particularly readers and library books, IT, and professional development
for staff.
• The pergola roof was completely replaced with clearlite that had the effect of
providing considerable more light and improving safety. It was decided that the
remaining upgrade to this area will be incorporated into the upgrade of the brick
area to be completed in the near future.
• Two temporary prefabs have been bought on site while a new block of classrooms
is built, the exact location of which is still to be decided. An initial concept
drawing of a two storied area to replace the brick building is underway. This
would provide much needed withdrawal space and also storage area.
• Because of our growing roll and the likely future development of ex-navy land the
possibility of incorporating some surrounding land into Hauraki School has been
floated with Nagati Whatua and the Ministry. They have shown some interest and
this is to be followed up on in the new year.
• Funds raised by the PTA that amounted to $138 000 in 2015 are tagged for the
junior school playground. Plans have been made to upgrade this which are to get
underway early in 2016. An extension to this playground is on hold until the
location of the new classroom block is determined.
5.5 Library upgraded to become an
efficient and well functioning
information centre.
5.6 An on going commitment to
ensuring high standards of health
and safety .
• New carpet and blinds have been installed.
• All shelving has been replaced that has made for improved access to books. Also
new blinds have been installed.
• Much PTA money carried over from the previous year was spent on increasing and
replacing readers and library books.
• A number of toilets and toilet areas have been upgraded and an increased number
of soap dispensers added.
• ‘Top Trust Cleaning Services’ continued to provide a satisfactory standard of
cleaning throughout the year that was monitored on an on going basis.
• Ongoing minor repairs and maintenance took place.
• The school buildings received an updated warrant of fitness at the end of the year.
• The swimming pool also received a certificate as evidence of meeting the required
standards.
Carpet replacement is scheduled for
January 2016.
Providing additional toilets will be a
priority when building a new classroom
block.
Regular checks throughout the year
according to checklist ensured potential
hazards were eliminated as much as
possible.
Ministry of Education | National Standards NAG2A(b) reporting commentary
National Standards NAG2A(b) reporting
Reporting commentary on students in years 1 to 8 that use The New Zealand Curriculum.
Date: December 2015
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
NAG2A (b)(i) Areas of strength
National Standard subjects: Reading, Writing, Maths
Discussion: Reading
87% of all students achieved at or above National Standard in 2015 compared with 90% in 2014.
Pakeha/Other European continued to featured most strongly with 89% of students achieving at or above with the Asian cohort very closely behind.
82% of Maori students achieved at or above standard.
95% of all students after two years at school achieved at or above National Standard.
93% of students after four years at school achieved at or above National Standard.
Approximately the same number of girls and boys achieved National Standard.
Writing
83% of all students achieved at or above National Standard compared with 82% in 2014.
All five Pasifika students met National Standard
85% of each of Maori and Asian cohorts achieved at or above National Standard.
89% of each of year 4 and year 5 students achieved at or above National Standard.
83% of year 2 students achieved at or above National Standard.
87% of girls met National Standard compared with 77% for boys.
Maths
88% % of all students achieved at or above National Standard in 2015, the same as in 2014.
92% of Asian students met National Standard with 40% of them achieving above Standard.
88% of Maori students met Standard.
91% of each of year 1, 2 and 5 students achieved National Standard or better.
92% of girls achieved National Standard compared with 88% for boys.
NAG2A (b)(i) Areas for improvement
National Standard subjects: Reading, Writing, Maths
Discussion: Reading
40% or 2 out of 5 students achieved below National Standard.
18% of Maori students were below Standard.
22% or 17 students did not achieve National Standard by the end of year 1.
11% of students in each of year 3 (21%) and 5 (16%) were below Standard.
Writing
22% of boys achieved below National Standard compared with 12% of girls.
33% of year 3 students at the end of the year had not reached National Standard.
20% of year 6 students did not meet National Standard.
Maths
20% of year 6 students did not achieve National Standard.
15% or 8 students did not meet National Standard at the end of each of year 3 and 4.
NAG2A (b)(ii) Basis for identifying areas for improvement
Discussion: Reading
For year 1, 2, and 3 students’ running records were administered by class teachers and overall teacher judgements made using guidelines provided to determine individual students level of achievement. Reading recovery data also contributed to decisions made.
For year 4-6 students overall teacher judgements were made using asTTle triangulated with Probe results, PAT data and teacher observations.
Writing
At the end of the year all year 1-4 students wrote a recount of the school fair that was marked using asTTle criteria and moderated within and across syndicates. Exemplars assisted with this process and teacher observation also contributed to the overall teacher judgement for each student.
Maths
Overall teacher judgements were made using Gloss and Ikan/Jam results as well as teacher observation of class work. For year 4-6 this was triangulated with PAT and AsTTle results. Consideration to the Number strand only is given in this report.
NAG2A (b)(iii) Planned actions for lifting achievement
Discussion: Reading
Using end of 2015 data identify specific students across the school needing additional support and timetable appropriate interventions for them.
Continue with the provision of reading recovery, phonetic awareness, Alpha to Omega, Seven Steps to Literacy, Quick 60, rainbow reading programmes and other specialist programmes for individuals or in small groups.
Continue to ensure that Sheena Cameron reading strategies are taught explicitly every week and that instructional reading groups take place every day.
Ensure all children can articulate the goal they are working on at any one time using the goal sheet provided as a guide. Record progress on these goal sheets.
Writing
Continue with small group tuition by specialist teachers in year 3/4 and year 5/6 at year 5 and 6 levels.
Continue with specialist programmes such as Stareway to Spelling.
Review allocation of writing genre to ensure children are being given opportunity to write every day with a focus on recount and narrative.
Continue to develop children’s ability to take ownership of goals provided. Record progress on these regularly.
Provide in class support for those who need it using teacher aides as much as possible.
Maths.
Continue to provide small group assistance for each of year 3, 4, 5, and 6.
Provide extension programmes for years 4-6 thereby reducing class numbers during maths time.
Focus on the learning of basic facts especially in the senior school.
Continue with maths recovery programme taken by trained teacher aide.
Demonstrate ownership of goals by being able to articulate these at any one time and record progress.
NAG2A (b) (iv) Progress Statement
Discussion: Reading
Overall reading results are similar to previous years although there were slightly more students who did not achieve National Standard this year.
A high level of achievement for reading has been maintained in 2013 with 90% of all students achieving at or above expectation compared with 91% in 2012. Results across all levels and ethnicities portray very similar trends when both years are compared.
Specialist teacher resourcing amounting to 1.8 teachers enabled additional support solely for those students who had been identified as being below National Standard or considered fragile. Results indicate that such intervention is very helpful to such students. One teacher, Kerry Clark taught reading four days a week to a year 4 group of eight students and a year 5 group of nine students. Reading Recovery taught by Carolyn Jones benefitted ten students over the course of the year and other programmes that assisted mainly dyslexic children students were Alpha to Omega and Seven Steps to Literacy. Rainbow Reading featured for up to 40 students over the course of the year. RTLB, RT Literacy support, group special education psychologists, and teacher aide support were also provided for select students. A phonological awareness and phonetic awareness group set up to consolidate reading sounds for year 1 and 2 students also proved worthwhile. A specialist ESOL teacher (.4 per week) tutored students over the course of the year.
Pleasing results overall reflect the strength of classroom programmes. In most classes these are taught explicitly to a high standard and there is a focus on one particular strategy at any one time. These are reinforced through follow up activities as part of reading tumbles.
Provision of specialist help from Mrs Carolyn Jones’ with the provision of reading recovery, alpha to omega, and seven steps to literacy that mainly catered for dyslexic children have been invaluable. Mrs Kerry Clark has also provided advice for class teachers.
The rainbow reading programme has benefitted a large group of students by providing additional reading mileage for those who need it.
A phonological and phonetic awareness group for junior students has helped children consolidate sounds they need to attempt unknown words in reading and writing.
Target children over and above specialist assistance in each class were tracked.
Writing
The explicit teaching of writing strategies across the school is reflected in the writing children are producing which overall is to a high standard.
Children are aware of the different purpose for writing and most are aware of the success criteria for each of the genre.
Continued focus on providing as much opportunity to write as possible is important. It has been suggested that SSW be introduced to provide writing mileage in addition to the writing programmes being currently taught.
Fine motor groups for year 1 and 2 students has been an important part of developing skills for some children new to school.
Provision of small withdrawal groups four days a week by specialist teachers, Mrs Kerry Clarke and Mrs Christine Dean provided invaluable support for these students.
A specialist ESOL teacher (.4 per week) tutored students in small groups over the course of the year.
Target children over and above specialist assistance in each class were tracked. Maths
All class programmes have followed the School Scheme that provides guidance for the delivery of maths across the school. Continued monitoring is recommended so that the teaching needs of each stage are fulfilled. The use of equipment as part of daily lessons is essential for developing understanding of concepts being taught.
Small group tuition by specialist teachers and teacher aide have proved invaluable for developing children’s confidence and mathematical ability.
Greater expectations for the learning of basic facts would benefit children especially at the senior level.
Target children over and above specialist assistance in each class were tracked.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Focus: Year 3 Writing group – 11 students
Strategic Aim: National Standards are used effectively to support improved student progress and achievement for writing.
Annual Aim: Reduce the number of year 3 students in the below category and strengthen the writing ability of students who only just make National Standard.
Target: Accelerate these students’ writing so that they all meet National Standard and are achieving at 2B or better by the end of the year.
Baseline data: At the beginning of 2015 all eleven students were below National Standard, one student was just below at 1A, eight were at 1P, and two were at 1B.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting Actions (what did we do?) Outcomes (what happened?) Reasons for the variance (why did it happen?)
Evaluation (where to next?)
These students were withdrawn from their classes four times a week during writing time and received small group instruction by specialist teacher, Mrs Kerry Clark.
The programme largely followed that of the mainstream class but was adapted to meet student needs as much as possible.
At the end of 2015 all eleven students were still below standard but had made progress. Six were just below Standard with an OTJ of 1A, and five were at 1P.
These children benefitted from being in an environment of high expectation but low stress. A number have specific learning difficulties in particular dyslexia and received regular individual tuition that helped address these needs. Close on going monitoring featured as well as praise and celebration of achievements. Teaching was often taken slowly and repetition often featured to consolidate learning.
Children were expected to record their ideas in sequence and in a structured manner that showed development id descriptive language and complexity of ideas as the year progressed. Punctuation and paragraphing were also a focus to ensure an easy flow for the reader.
It is recommended that these students would benefit from being with the same teacher for writing in year 4 where an atmosphere of trust is already established and the teacher knows individual student learning needs.
Planning for next year: Continue to support this group of students in a small withdrawal group three days a week.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Focus: Year 4 Writing – 12 students including one Maori student and one Pasifika student.
Strategic Aim: National Standards are used effectively to support improved student progress and achievement for writing.
Annual Aim: Reduce the number of year 3 students in the below category and strengthen the writing ability of students who only just make National Standard.
Target: Accelerate these students’ writing so that they all meet National Standard and are achieving at 2P or better by the end of the year.
Baseline data: At the beginning of 2015 three students were at Standard but fragile, a further seven were just below Standard and one student was below.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting Actions (what did we do?) Outcomes (what happened?) Reasons for the variance (why did it happen?)
Evaluation (where to next?)
These students were withdrawn from their classes four times a week during writing time and received small group instruction by specialist teacher, Mrs Kerry Clark.
The programme largely followed that of the mainstream class but was adapted to meet student needs as much as possible.
At the end of 2015 four students were at Standard with an OTJ of 2P, seven were just below at 2B, and one student was achieving at 1A.
Although most students were still below standard they all made progress over the course of the year.
These children benefitted from being in an environment of high expectation but low stress. A number have specific learning difficulties in particular dyslexia and received regular individual tuition that helped address these needs. Close on going monitoring featured as well as praise and celebration of achievements. Teaching was often taken slowly and repetition often featured to consolidate learning.
Children were expected to record their ideas in sequence and in a structured manner that showed development id descriptive language and complexity of ideas as the year progressed. Punctuation and paragraphing were also a focus to ensure an easy flow for the reader.
It is recommended that these students would benefit from being in a small group situation for writing in 2016 where individual attention is readily available and their specific learning needs met in a high expectation low stress environment.
Planning for next year: Continue to support this group of students in a small withdrawal group three days a week.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Focus: Year 5 Writing - 9 students including one Maori and one Pasifika student
Strategic Aim: National Standards are used effectively to support improved student progress and achievement for writing.
Annual Aim: Reduce the number of year 5 students in the below category and strengthen the writing ability of students who only just make national Standard.
Target: Accelerate these students’ writing so that they all meet National Standard and are achieving at 3B or better by the end of the year.
Baseline data: At the beginning of 2015 all nine students were below National Standard, six had an OTJ of 2B, and three were achieving at 1A.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting Actions (what did we do?) Outcomes (what happened?) Reasons for the variance (why did it happen?)
Evaluation (where to next?)
These nine students were withdrawn from their classes four days a week during writing time to work with a specialist teacher. The programme followed that of the mainstream class but was adapted to meet individual needs within the group. On going monitoring including discussion with class teachers took place regularly.
At the end of 2015 five of the students had just met National Standard and had OTJ’s of 3B. Three were just below with 2A, and one student was below with 2P.
Some of these students have a specific learning difficulties, most commonly dyslexia, and writing is a struggle for them. Small group tuition that is closely monitored is of benefit to them.
A variety of strategies used aimed at building confidence and a positive rapport with their teacher. Teaching often occurred more slowly and repetition was usually needed to consolidate concepts taught. Also one on one teaching took place to meet individual needs. The use of a device for writing was motivating for some students. The devices enable their work to look neat and help them to make changes without having to rewrite. It monitors spelling and grammar errors so students notice errors, stop and think about them and attempt to correct them independently. As the surface features are barriers for these children this support is invaluable. Celebration of achievement was also an important aspect.
Continue to use strategies outlined to help manage learning difficulties.
Use devices where possible for writing.
Keep learning intentions simple and clear but expectations high.
Share and celebrate work.
Provide plenty of praise.
Continue with the same teacher as this will provide continuity for students.
Planning for next year: Continue to support this group of students in a small withdrawal group four days a week.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Focus: Year 6 Writing - 9 students including two ESOL students.
Strategic Aim: National Standards are used effectively to support improved student progress and achievement for writing.
Annual Aim: Reduce the number of year 6 students in the below category and strengthen the writing ability of students who only just make National Standard.
Target: Accelerate these students’ writing so that they all meet National Standard and are achieving at 3P or better by the end of the year.
Baseline data: At the beginning of 2015 all nine students were below National Standard, one was at 3B, seven were at 2A and one was at 2P.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Actions (what did we do?) Outcomes (what happened?) Reasons for the variance (why did it happen?)
Evaluation (where to next?)
These nine students were withdrawn from their classes four days a week during writing time to work with a specialist teacher. The programme followed that of the mainstream class but was adapted to meet individual needs within the group. On going monitoring including discussion with class teachers took place regularly.
At the end of 2015, one student had achieved at Standard with an OTJ of 3A, and eight students were just below with 3B.
Some of these students have a specific learning difficulties, most commonly dyslexia, and writing is a struggle for them. Small group tuition that is closely monitored is of benefit to them.
A variety of strategies used aimed at building confidence and a positive rapport with their teacher. Teaching often occurred more slowly and repetition was usually needed to consolidate concepts taught. Also one on one teaching took place to meet individual needs. The use of a device for writing was motivating for some students. The devices enable their work to look neat and help them to make changes without having to rewrite. It monitors spelling and grammar errors so students notice errors, stop and think about them and attempt to correct them independently. As the surface features are barriers for these children this support is invaluable. Celebration of achievement was also an important aspect.
Continue to use strategies outlined to help manage learning difficulties.
Use devices where possible for writing.
Keep learning intentions simple and clear but expectations high.
Share and celebrate work.
Provide plenty of praise.
Continue with the same teacher as this will provide continuity for students.
Planning for next year: These students move to intermediate next year but will need on going support preferably in small group situations.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Focus: Year 3 Maths – 9 students including two Maori students
Strategic Aim: National Standards are used effectively to support improved student progress and achievement for maths.
Annual Aim: Reduce the number of year 3 students in the below category and strengthen the writing ability of students who only just make National Standard.
Target: Accelerate these students’ mathematical ability so that they all meet National Standard and are achieving at 2B or better by the end of the year.
Baseline data: At the beginning of 2015 three students were just below National Standard at 1A, and the remaining six students had an OTJ of 1P.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting Actions (what did we do?) Outcomes (what happened?) Reasons for the variance (why did it happen?)
Evaluation (where to next?)
These students were withdrawn from their classes four times a week during maths time and received small group instruction by specialist teacher, Mrs Kerry Clark.
The programme largely followed that of the mainstream class but was adapted to meet student needs as much as possible.
By the end of 2015 with the exception of one child all had made progress although only two had achieved National Standard. The remaining seven were just below Standard with an OTJ of 1A.
The small group situation has allowed these students to work at a slower pace in order to consolidate their learning. Mastery of particular concepts was a priority before moving to the learning of the next.
Learning to transfer what students know to solve more difficult mathematical problems is a focus for these students as they gain confidence in themselves and their ability.
It is recommended that they continue with the same teacher in a small group situation for maths where a high level of trust already exists and the teacher is aware of students’ learning needs.
Planning for next year: Continue to support this group of students in a small withdrawal group three days a week in year 4.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Focus: Year 4 Maths – 11 students including one Maori and one Pasifika students.
Strategic Aim: National Standards are used effectively to support improved student progress and achievement for maths.
Annual Aim: Reduce the number of year 4 students in the below category and strengthen the writing ability of students who only just make National Standard.
Target: Accelerate these students’ mathematical ability so that they all meet National Standard and are achieving at 2P or better by the end of the year.
Baseline data: At the beginning of 2015 all students were below National Standard, two were at 2B. seven at 1A, and one at 1B.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting Actions (what did we do?) Outcomes (what happened?) Reasons for the variance (why did it happen?)
Evaluation (where to next?)
These students were withdrawn from their classes four times a week during maths time and received small group instruction by specialist teacher, Mrs Kerry Clark.
The programme largely followed that of the mainstream class but was adapted to meet student needs as much as possible.
By the end of 2015, one student had achieved National Standard and was withdrawn from the programme. Four had progressed to 2B, and two others who were at 2B at the beginning of the year remained at 2B all year. Two other students who were at 1A at the beginning of the year were still at 1A at the end of the year. Another two made significant progress and achieved an OTJ of 2B by the end of the year.
The small group situation has allowed these students to work at a slower pace in order to consolidate their learning. Mastery of particular concepts was a priority before moving to the learning of the next.
Why some chn stagnated??
Learning to transfer what students know to solve more difficult mathematical problems is a focus for these students as they gain confidence in themselves and their ability.
It is recommended that they continue to be taught in a small group situation for maths in 2016..
Planning for next year: Continue to support this group of students in a small withdrawal group three days a week in year 5.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Focus: Extension Year 4 Maths – 13 students including four Asian students.
Strategic Aim: Overall teacher judgements are used effectively to support improved student progress and achievement for maths.
Annual Aim: Enhance the mathematical performance of students in the above National Standard category.
Target: To achieve at least one stage above the beginning of the year score.
Baseline data: At the beginning of 2015, all students were above National Standard.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting Actions (what did we do?) Outcomes (what happened?) Reasons for the variance (why did it happen?)
Evaluation (where to next?)
These students were withdrawn from their classes five days a week during maths time to work with specialist teacher, Mrs Sandy Coutts.
By the end of 2015 all students had achieved the target and moved up at least one sub-level. The National Standard for year 4 students is 2P but ten of these students had achieved 3P which is three sub-levels above, and three students had achieved 3A which is four sub-levels above.
Students were accelerated using the beginning of the year data as a starting point. Small group tuition allowed for targeted teaching according to where children were at and on going individual assistance.
Because these students are achieving well above their peers, continued instruction at this level is important so their needs are catered for.
Planning for next year: These students will benefit from continuing in an extension programme that meets their mathematical needs and this is planned for in year 5.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Focus: Year 5 Maths – 8 students including one Maori student.
Strategic Aim: National Standards are used effectively to support improved student progress and achievement for maths.
Annual Aim: : Reduce the number of year 5 students in the below category and strengthen their mathematical ability of students who only just make National Standard.
Target: Accelerate these students’ mathematical ability so that they all meet National Standard and are achieving at 3B or better by the end of the year.
Baseline data: At the beginning of 2015 all students were below National Standard, one was just below at 2A, two were at 2P, four were at 2B and one was at 1A.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting Actions (what did we do?) Outcomes (what happened?) Reasons for the variance (why did it happen?)
Evaluation (where to next?)
These students were withdrawn from their classes four times a week during maths time and received small group instruction by specialist teacher, Mrs Christine Dean.
The programme largely followed that of the mainstream class but was adapted to meet student needs as much as possible.
By the end of 2015 three had achieved National Standard, four had moved to 2A, and one had progressed to 2P.
The small group situation has allowed these students to work at a slower pace in order to consolidate their learning. Mastery of particular concepts was a priority before moving to the learning of the next.
Learning to transfer what students know to solve more difficult mathematical problems is a focus for these students as they gain confidence in themselves and their ability.
It is recommended that they continue with the same teacher in a small group situation for maths in year 6 where a high level of trust already exists and the teacher is aware of students’ learning needs.
Planning for next year: Continue to support this group of students in a small withdrawal group three days a week in year 6.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Focus: Extension Year 5 Maths – 13 students including five Asian students.
Strategic Aim: Overall teacher judgements are used effectively to support improved student progress and achievement for maths.
Annual Aim: Enhance the mathematical performance of students in the above National Standard category.
Target: To achieve at least one stage above the beginning of the year score.
Baseline data: At the beginning of 2015, all students were above National Standard.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting Actions (what did we do?) Outcomes (what happened?) Reasons for the variance (why did it happen?)
Evaluation (where to next?)
These students were withdrawn from their classes five days a week during maths time to work with specialist teacher, Mrs Sandy Coutts.
By the end of 2015 all students had achieved the target and moved up at least one sub-level. The National Standard for year 5 students is 3B but ten of these students had achieved 4B which is three sub-levels more, one student had achieved 4P, four sub-levels above expectation, and two had achieved 3A which is two sub-levels above.
Students were accelerated using the beginning of the year data as a starting point. Small group tuition allowed for targeted teaching according to where children were at and on going individual assistance.
Because these students are achieving well above their peers, continued instruction at this level is important so their needs are catered for.
Planning for next year: These students will benefit from continuing in an extension programme that meets their mathematical needs and this is planned for in year 6.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Focus: Year 6 Maths – 12 students including two ESOL students.
Strategic Aim: National Standards are used effectively to support improved student progress and achievement for maths.
Annual Aim: Reduce the number of year 6 students in the below category and strengthen the writing ability of students who only just make National Standard.
Target: Accelerate these students’ mathematical ability so that they all meet National Standard and are achieving at 3P or better by the end of the year
Baseline data: At the beginning of 2015, all students were below National Standard. Three were just below at 3B, six were at 2A, two were at 2P and one was at 2B.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting Actions (what did we do?) Outcomes (what happened?) Reasons for the variance (why did it happen?)
Evaluation (where to next?)
These students were withdrawn from their classes four times a week during maths time and received small group instruction by specialist teacher, Mrs Christine Dean.
The programme largely followed that of the mainstream class but was adapted to meet student needs as much as possible.
By the end of 2015 three students had achieved the National Standard of 3P, four students had progressed to 3B, two students stayed at their beginning of the year scores below Standard, one student moved to 2A and two others moved to 2P.
The small group situation has allowed these students to work at a slower pace in order to consolidate their learning. Mastery of particular concepts was a priority before moving to the learning of the next.
Consolidation in all areas of mathematical learning is needed for these students. Learning to transfer what they know to solve more difficult mathematical problems is a focus for these students as they gain confidence in themselves and their ability.
Planning for next year: These students will need continued support as they move to intermediate next year.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Focus: Extension Year 6 Maths – 15 students including four Asian students.
Strategic Aim: Overall teacher judgements are used effectively to support improved student progress and achievement for maths.
Annual Aim: Enhance the mathematical performance of students in the above National Standard category.
Target: To achieve at least one stage above the beginning of the year score.
Baseline data: At the beginning of 2015, all students were above National Standard.
Ministry of Education | Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting
Analysis of variance reporting Actions (what did we do?) Outcomes (what happened?) Reasons for the variance (why did it happen?)
Evaluation (where to next?)
These students were withdrawn from their classes five days a week during maths time to work with specialist teacher, Mrs Sandy Coutts.
By the end of 2015 all students had achieved the target and moved up at least one sub-level. The National Standard for year 6 students is 3P but three of these students had achieved 4P which is three sub-levels more, eleven had achieved 4A which is four sub-levels above, and one student had achieved 5B, five sub-levels above expectation.
Students were accelerated using the beginning of the year data as a starting point. Small group tuition allowed for targeted teaching according to where children were at and on going individual assistance.
Because these students are achieving well above their peers, continued instruction at this level is important so their needs are catered for.
Planning for next year: These students will benefit from continuing in an extension programme that meets their mathematical needs as they move to intermediate.
Ministry of Education | English Language Learning Progressions reporting
English Language Learning Progressions reporting
The school population includes a number of students who are English Language Learners (ELL) who may not yet be making marked progress in relation to The New Zealand Curriculum National Standards. This reporting provides further information about ELL progress in relation to the ELL Progressions for reading, writing, speaking or listening.
Date: Dec 2015
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Listening
ELLP Stage End 2015 9
44.4%
4 Stage 3
3 1
22.3%
2 Stage 2
2
33.3%
3 Stage 1
1 2
0%
Foundation Stage
ELLP Stage End 2014 Foundation Stage
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Total number of students
9 1 4 3 1
11.1 % 44.4 % 33.3 %
11.2%
The data provided in the table above shows the progress these students are making in relation to the ELL Progressions.
Additional Comments: For listening there were some other children who joined the group during the year but for the purpose of this reporting only those students who were present at the beginning of the year and at the end of the year have been counted.
Ministry of Education | English Language Learning Progressions reporting
English Language Learning Progressions reporting
The school population includes a number of students who are English Language Learners (ELL) who may not yet be making marked progress in relation to The New Zealand Curriculum National Standards. This reporting provides further information about ELL progress in relation to the ELL Progressions for reading, writing, speaking or listening.
Date: Dec 2015
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Reading
ELLP Stage End 2015 9
33.3%
3 Stage 3
3
33.3%
3 Stage 2
1 2
22.3%
2 Stage 1
2
11.1%
1 Foundation Stage 1
ELLP Stage End 2014 9 Foundation Stage
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Total number of students
3 1 5
33.3 % 11.1% 55.6%
The data provided in the table above shows the progress these students are making in relation to the ELL Progressions.
Additional Comments: For reading there were some other children who joined the group during the year but for the purpose of this reporting only those students who were present at the beginning of the year and at the end of the year have been counted.
Ministry of Education | English Language Learning Progressions reporting
English Language Learning Progressions reporting
The school population includes a number of students who are English Language Learners (ELL) who may not yet be making marked progress in relation to The New Zealand Curriculum National Standards. This reporting provides further information about ELL progress in relation to the ELL Progressions for reading, writing, speaking or listening.
Date: December 2015
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Speaking
ELLP Stage End 2015 9
33.3%
3 Stage 3
2 1
44.4%
4 Stage 2
2 2
22.3%
2 Stage 1
2
% Foundation Stage
ELLP Stage End 2014 Foundation Stage
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Total number of students
9 2 2 4 1
100% 22.2 % 22.2 % 44.5 %
11.1%
The data provided in the table above shows the progress these students are making in relation to the ELL Progressions.
Additional Comments: For speaking there were some other children who joined the group during the year but for the purpose of this reporting only those students who were present at the beginning of the year and at the end of the year have been counted.
Ministry of Education | English Language Learning Progressions reporting
English Language Learning Progressions reporting
The school population includes a number of students who are English Language Learners (ELL) who may not yet be making marked progress in relation to The New Zealand Curriculum National Standards. This reporting provides further information about ELL progress in relation to the ELL Progressions for reading, writing, speaking or listening.
Date: Dec 2015
School name: Hauraki School School number: 1304
Writing
ELLP Stage End 2015 9
11.1 %
1 Stage 3
1
33.3%
3 Stage 2
3
44.5%
4 Stage 1
3 1
11.1%
1 Foundation Stage 1
ELLP Stage End 2014 Foundation Stage
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Total number of students
9 4 1 4
44.4 % 11.2 % 44.4%
The data provided in the table above shows the progress these students are making in relation to the ELL Progressions.
Additional Comments: For writing there were some other children who joined the group during the year but for the purpose of this reporting only those students who were present at the beginning of the year and at the end of the year have been counted.