Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Prepared by
NWEG Project: 13890
Prepared for: Capital Regional Housing Corporation
631 Fisgard St. Victoria BC Victoria, BC V8W 1R7
Hazardous Materials Survey
James Yates Gardens – 1150 Yates Street Victoria, BC
210-2950 Douglas St
Victoria, British Columbia
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1
1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1
2 REGULATORY CRITERIA ..................................................................................... 2
2.1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) ..................................................................................... 2 2.2 Asbestos .......................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Mercury ............................................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Arsenic ............................................................................................................................. 3 2.5 Ozone-depleting Substances (CFCs/ODS) ..................................................................... 3 2.6 Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation .............................................................................. 4 2.7 Radioactive Materials ...................................................................................................... 4 2.8 Aboveground / Underground Storage Tanks ................................................................... 5 2.9 Lead ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.10 Hantavirus – Rodent Droppings ...................................................................................... 5 2.11 Silica ................................................................................................................................ 6 2.12 Mould ............................................................................................................................... 6
3 FINDINGS .............................................................................................................. 7
3.1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) ..................................................................................... 7 3.2 Asbestos .......................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Mercury ............................................................................................................................ 8 3.4 Arsenic ............................................................................................................................. 8 3.5 Ozone-depleting Substances (CFCs/ODS) ..................................................................... 8 3.6 Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation .............................................................................. 9 3.7 Radioactive Materials ...................................................................................................... 9 3.8 Aboveground Storage Tanks ........................................................................................... 9 3.9 Lead ................................................................................................................................. 9 3.10 Hantavirus – Rodent Droppings ...................................................................................... 9 3.11 Silica ................................................................................................................................ 9 3.12 Mould ............................................................................................................................. 10
4 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 11
5 CLOSURE ............................................................................................................ 12
APPENDIX 1 Photographs ...................................................................................... 13
APPENDIX 2 Sampling Locations ............................................................................. 18
APPENDIX 3 Sample Report ................................................................................... 25
APPENDIX 4 Evaluation of Asbestos Containing Material…..…………..…...……..29
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
North West Environmental Group conducted a hazardous materials risk assessment at James
Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street on August 24, 2011. Building fabric components suspected of
containing hazardous materials were identified, logged and, where necessary, sampled and
analyzed to confirm the presence or absence of hazardous materials.
James Yates Gardens is an apartment building with seven family units. It was built in 1985 and
has a stucco and wood exterior and asphalt shingle roof.
The buildings were occupied during the survey and, therefore, invasive investigative techniques
were not used. Even with the most invasive survey techniques, however, it should be noted that
the possibility remains for other concealed materials to be found during the demolition process.
WorkSafeBC Regulations require that all hazardous materials found to be in the way of the
planned work, including asbestos, be removed prior to demolition. Removal of hazardous
materials must be undertaken by a qualified contractor employing WorkSafeBC approved
procedures. If materials that are suspected of containing hazardous components such as lead or
asbestos, are encountered during deconstruction that differ from, or are in addition to those
reported in the bulk sample collection report, then work must stop until the material content can
be determined.
The purpose of this hazard assessment was to identify the locations of asbestos and other
hazardous materials prior to any planned demolition or renovation work. This report includes a list
of building materials that are confirmed or suspected of containing hazardous materials.
The survey identified the following hazardous materials:
Hazardous Material Type and Location
Asbestos Sheet Flooring (see detail in table below) Chrysotile 20% to 25%
PCBs Fluorescent Light Ballasts present
Mercury Fluorescent Light Tubes
Lead Lead based or lead containing paint assumed to be
in all original coatings on and in the buildings
Ozone Depleting Substances Fridge present in kitchens
Above Ground Storage Tanks (AGST)
AGST not observed
Radioactive Materials Smoke Detectors may be present
Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation
UFFI not observed
Hantavirus – Rodent Droppings Rodent droppings not observed
Arsenic Pressure Treated Wood not observed on the property
Silica Assumed to be present in concrete, plaster and stucco
Mould None observed
Where hazardous materials were found they can be presumed to be found in similar materials
throughout the buildings.
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 2
Asbestos containing materials are known to be in the following materials/locations:
13890-07
Maintenance Closet
Sheet Flooring
13890-10
Unit 2 – Kitchen
Sheet Flooring
13890-17
Unit 4 – Kitchen
Sheet Flooring
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 3
13890-22
Unit 5 – Kitchen
Sheet Flooring
13890-24
Storage Unit 5
Sheet Flooring
Asbestos containing materials may be in the following materials/locations:
Throughout buildings:
Sheet Flooring (may be concealed beneath new flooring)
Pipe and elbow insulation
Roofing materials
Cement blocks may contain vermiculite
Gaskets
Warning: in the event any additional suspect materials are encountered during demolition activities, work
on those materials must stop immediately and remain undisturbed until testing confirms the presence or
absence of asbestos or other hazardous material. If this any materials suspected of containing asbestos or
another hazardous material are disturbed during the work, all work shall stop until the area is contained, the
hazard evaluated by a qualified professional and the hazardous materials, if indeed present, is safely
managed by a qualified contractor.
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 1
1 INTRODUCTION
North West Environmental was retained by Capital Regional Housing Corporation to conduct a
hazardous-material risk assessment at James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street as per
WorkSafeBC requirements. This is an inventory intended to identify building materials and
equipment containing hazardous materials that maybe be impacted by any renovation work
planned for these buildings.
James Yates Gardens is an apartment building with seven family units. It was built in 1985 and
has a stucco exterior and asphalt shingle roof.
All accessible areas of these buildings within the survey area were inspected for the presence of
asbestos-containing materials, mould, lead, radioactive sources, ozone depleting substances,
mercury, and PCBs. Where appropriate, representative samples of materials suspected of
containing asbestos or other hazardous materials were collected and sent for confirmatory
testing.
Observations were made to determine the presence of equipment including mercury-containing
thermostats, smoke detectors, refrigerating devices, urea-formaldehyde foam insulation, as well
as aboveground storage tanks that may be impacted by the work.
WorkSafeBC Regulations require that all hazardous materials including asbestos be removed
prior to demolition. Removal of hazardous materials must be undertaken by a qualified contractor
employing WorkSafeBC approved procedures. If materials are encountered during deconstruction
that differ from, or are in addition to those described in this report, then work must stop until the
material content can be determined and appropriate precautionary measures employed to protect
workers and others at or near the worksite.
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 2
2 REGULATORY CRITERIA
As per WorkSafeBC requirements, the buildings were surveyed for the presence of severall
different types of hazardous materials including:
Polychlorinated biphenyls Asbestos Mercury Arsenic Ozone Depleting Substances Urea formaldehyde foam insulation Radioactive Materials Above or Underground Storage Tanks Lead Hantavirus – rodent droppings Silica Mould
2.1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) are regulated under both federal (Canadian Environmental
Protection Act) and BC Hazardous Waste Regulation and must be treated as PCB waste and be
stored and disposed of accordingly.
Each fluorescent light fixture removed during renovation or demolition should have the ballast
checked to determine if it contains PCB. Ballasts containing PCB must be removed, sorted and
transported to a licensed facility. Although rare, paints have been known to contain PCBs.
2.2 Asbestos
Projects that will result in the disturbance of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) must satisfy
WorkSafeBC’s regulations and conform to the guidance document Safe Work Practices for
Handling of Asbestos. WorkSafeBC’s Occupational Health and Safety Regulation defines an
asbestos-containing material as “any manufactured article or other material which contains one
(1) per cent or more asbestos by weight at the time of manufacture, or which contains one (1) per
cent or more asbestos as determined by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) Analytical Method 9002 (dispersion staining, polarized light microscope) or x-ray
diffraction”. This limit is currently being reviewed by WorkSafeBC with a view to reducing it to 0.5
percent by weight.
The asbestos-containing material can also be characterized as friable and non-friable. Friable
asbestos “means any material which, when dry, can be easily crumbled or powdered by hand
pressure, or a material that is crumbled or powdered” as defined under the BC Occupational
Health and Safety Regulation. The condition of the asbestos and classifications would be used in
assessing the level of action required with respect to re-use of the buildings
Worker exposure to asbestos fibres is also regulated by the BC Occupational Health and Safety
Regulation. The WorkSafeBC eight-hour time-weighted average(TWA) for asbestos fibres (all
forms) is 0.1 fibre/cm3. Exposure to these substances must be kept as close to zero as is
reasonably practicable.
Bulk samples are collected in accordance with NIOSH Analytical Method 9002 and the
WorkSafeBC guideline document, Safe Work Practices for Handling Asbestos.
Asbestos is designated as an ALARA substance; worker exposure to this product must be kept
“as low as reasonably achievable” (ALARA). Employers are required under Section 5.54
(Exposure control plan) of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation (OHSR) to develop an
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 3
exposure control plan (ECP) when workers are or may be exposed to airborne concentrations of
this materials in excess of 50% of the exposure limit.
2.3 Mercury
Mercury is hazardous substance, and any maintenance or abatement involving materials
containing mercury or mercury compounds must be done in compliance with the BC Occupational
Health and Safety Regulations (BCOHSR).
Employers with workers who have a risk of exposure must have an exposure control plan (ECP)
in place prior to allowing their workers to come into contact with this material. As with all other
hazardous substances, all personnel working around or with such materials must be made aware
of their presence and be supplied with training in the potential health effects and means of
avoiding exposures.
As a hazardous substance, transportation and disposal of this substance must be done in
compliance with the federal Transportation of Dangerous Goods (TDG) Regulations and the BC
Hazardous Waste Regulation. Mercury is found in fluorescent light bulbs, thermostats,
manometers, and equipment such as electrical switches.
Mercury is designated as an ALARA substance; worker exposure to this product must be kept “as
low as reasonably achievable” (ALARA). Employers are required under Section 5.54 (Exposure
control plan) of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation (OHSR) to develop an exposure
control plan (ECP) when workers are or may be exposed to airborne concentrations of this
materials in excess of 50% of the exposure limit.
2.4 Arsenic
Arsenic is hazardous substance, and any maintenance or abatement involving materials
containing arsenic or arsenic compounds must be done in compliance with the BC Occupational
Health and Safety Regulations (BCOHSR).
Employers with workers who have a risk of exposure must have an exposure control plan (ECP)
in place prior to allowing their workers to come into contact with this material. As with all other
hazardous substances, all personnel working around or with such materials must be made aware
of their presence and be supplied with training in the potential health effects and means of
avoiding exposures.
Arsenic has long been used as a pesticide due to its toxic properties. Arsenical pesticides, often
in the form of chromated copper arsenate (CCA), when applied with high pressure to wood, serve
to extend the structural life of the material by making it resistant to mould, rot and insect
infestation. Studies have shown that these materials have the ability to leach arsenic into the soil.
Arsenic may also be found in paints. Although wood and wood dusts contaminated with arsenical
pesticides do not require specialized disposal in BC, care must be exercised to minimize the
potential for worker exposure to these materials through direct skin contact or through inhalation
of dusts and fumes.
2.5 Ozone-depleting Substances (CFCs/ODS)
Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are ozone-depleting substances (ODS) and a type of halocarbon.
ODS are regulated by the Canadian Environmental Protection Act under the Ozone-Depleting
Substances Regulations 1998 SOR/99-7 and the Federal Halocarbon Regulations (FHR)
SOR/99-225. Compounds that contain only chlorine, fluorine and carbon are called CFCs.
These materials are used in refrigeration systems and in fire suppression systems. The other
main refrigerants are hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and blends
of fluorocarbons (designated by “R”).
While the regulations allow the continued use of halocarbon refrigerants, they strictly prohibit any
person from releasing into the environment any halocarbon.
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 4
In the case of demolition, these materials will require proper recovery and disposal. The BC
Ozone-Depleting Substances Regulations would also apply to any CFC/ODS abatement
procedures. These regulations require that all ODS must be collected, stored and recycled, or
collected and disposed appropriately by a licensed professional.
2.6 Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation
Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation (UFFI) was banned in 1978. All such material was to have
been removed and replaced. Standard real estate agreements currently contain a “No UFFI”
clause and as a best management practice, all buildings containing UFFI should have the
material removed. UFFI is still found in many buildings in BC.
2.7 Radioactive Materials
Many buildings contain smoke alarms which contain small sealed radioactive sources in the form
of 241
Americium. The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) and the Canadian Nuclear
Safety Act regulate radioactive materials. These materials are sealed into a metal case within the
smoke detector and must not be damaged or tampered with. Smoke detectors intended for
disposal must be handled in accordance with CNSC regulations.
Ceramic tiles and some forms of granite sometimes contain radioactive materials. These
materials should be checked prior to work being carried out on them to determine if radioactive
materials are present.
Radon gas is a by-product of radioactive decay of certain naturally occurring radioactive
materials. The following map from http://www.bccdc.ca/healthenv/Contaminants/Radon/default.htm
shows areas of BC where this has been found:
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 5
2.8 Aboveground / Underground Storage Tanks
Storage tanks containing fuels have the ability to leak over time and can result in soil and
groundwater contamination. These tanks must be observed and checked over time to ensure
they do not leak. Evidence of leaks must be investigated and any potential contamination
remediated. The Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) publishes a Code of
Practise for the safe management of aboveground and underground storage tanks.
2.9 Lead
Lead is a hazardous substance and as such is regulated under the BC Occupational Health and
Safety Regulation. Airborne exposure criteria, respirator requirements and mandatory worker
testing requirements are also outlined under this regulation. As with all other designated
substances, all personnel working around or with such materials must be made aware of their
presence and be supplied with training in the potential health effects and means of avoiding
exposures.
Employers with workers who have a risk of exposure must have an exposure control plan (ECP)
in place prior to allowing their workers to come into contact with this material. As with all other
hazardous substances, all personnel working around or with such materials must be made aware
of their presence and be supplied with training in the potential health effects and means of
avoiding exposures.
Most houses and buildings built before 1950 have had lead-based paint applied to the interior or
exterior surfaces. In most cases, lead paint of this era contained up to 40% lead by weight. Paints
made between 1950 and 1978 typically contained smaller quantities of lead.
As leachable lead is a hazardous waste, disposal sites should be contacted in advance to ensure
their willingness to accept the waste. Specialized sample preparation and analysis must be
undertaken in order to determine if the lead is leachable. As a hazardous substance,
transportation and disposal of this substance must be done in compliance with the federal
Transportation of Dangerous Goods (TDG) Regulations and the BC Hazardous Waste
Regulation.
Lead is designated as an ALARA substance; worker exposure to this product must be kept “as
low as reasonably achievable” (ALARA). Employers are required under Section 5.54 (Exposure
control plan) of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation (OHSR) to develop an exposure
control plan (ECP) when workers are or may be exposed to airborne concentrations of this
materials in excess of 50% of the exposure limit.
2.10 Hantavirus – Rodent Droppings
The Hantavirus is a virus associated with Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome, a disease caught
through contact with the urine or droppings, or by being bitten or scratched by infected rodents.
The disease starts off like a cold or flu (fever, sore muscles, headaches, nausea, vomiting), but
progresses to pneumonia-like conditions within a few days. The change in intensity of the
symptoms is very rapid and can result in fluid build-up in the lungs and respiratory failure.
Possible exposure to hantavirus is regulated under the BC Occupational Health and Safety
Regulation. Employers with workers who have a risk of exposure must have an exposure control
plan (ECP) in place prior to allowing their workers to come into contact with this material. As with
all other hazardous substances, all personnel working around or with such materials must be
made aware of their presence and be supplied with training in the potential health effects and
means of avoiding exposures.
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 6
2.11 Silica
Silica is a hazardous substance and as such is regulated under the BC Occupational Health and
Safety Regulation. Airborne exposure criteria, respirator requirements and mandatory worker
testing requirements are also outlined under this regulation. As with all other designated
substances, all personnel working around or with such materials must be made aware of their
presence and be supplied with training in the potential health effects and means of avoiding
exposures.
Employers with workers who have a risk of exposure must have an exposure control plan (ECP)
in place prior to allowing their workers to come into contact with this material. As with all other
hazardous substances, all personnel working around or with such materials must be made aware
of their presence and be supplied with training in the potential health effects and means of
avoiding exposures.
Crystalline silica dust can cause a disabling, sometimes fatal disease called silicosis. The fine
particles are deposited in the lungs, causing thickening and scarring of the lung tissue. The scar
tissue restricts the lungs’ ability to extract oxygen from the air. This damage is permanent, but
symptoms of the disease may not appear for many years.
Employers have a duty to protect their workers from silica dust exposure on construction projects.
Studies show that when common construction work tasks involving the sanding, drilling, chipping,
grinding, cutting, sawing, sweeping, and blasting of concrete and concrete products are
conducted without using dust controls, workers are exposed to airborne silica concentrations at
levels far above the occupational exposure limits.
Crystalline silica is an ALARA substance; worker exposure to this product must be kept “as low
as reasonably achievable” (ALARA). Employers are required under Section 5.54 (Exposure
control plan) of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation (OHSR) to develop an exposure
control plan (ECP) when workers are or may be exposed to airborne concentrations of this
materials in excess of 50% of the exposure limit.
2.12 Mould
Within the BC Occupational Health and Safety Regulations, there are no established permissible
exposure levels for mould spores in air. This means that there are no published concentrations
above which worker exposure is deemed to be hazardous and under which workers would not
need respiratory protection. WorkSafeBC does, however, provide guidance on protocols for
protecting workers from the hazards of airborne mould and bacteria within the section(s) of the
Regulation guidelines addressing Indoor Air Quality.
Other guidelines for addressing mould in Canada include:
The Institute of Inspection, Cleaning and Restoration and Certification (IICRC) standard S500 governing both water damage restoration and entitled: Standard for Professional Water Damage Restoration – S500. This document is approved by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
Health Canada: Fungal contamination in public buildings: A guide to recognition and management, 1995
Health Canada. Fungal Contamination in Public Buildings: Health Effects and Investigation Methods, 2004
These guidelines also state that any non-porous (metal, glass and hard plastics) and semi-porous
(wood and concrete) materials that are structurally sound and visibly mouldy can be cleaned and
re-used. However, porous materials such as ceiling tiles, wallpaper, insulation, drywall, and
carpets with more than a small area of contamination, should be removed and discarded.
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 7
3 FINDINGS
As per WorkSafeBC requirements, the building was surveyed for the presence of several different
types of hazardous materials including:
Polychlorinated biphenyls Asbestos Mercury Arsenic Ozone Depleting Substances Urea formaldehyde foam insulation Radioactive Materials Above or Underground Storage Tanks Lead Hantavirus – rodent droppings Silica Mould
Photographs of materials are in Appendix 1.
Sample location drawings are in Appendix 2.
Copies of the analytical reports are provided in Appendix 3.
3.1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)
Fluorescent light fixtures were observed in the buildings during the survey.
Prior to demolition, any fluorescent light fixtures should be checked to ensure that ballasts do not
contain PCB’s. If PCB’s are found to be present, the ballasts should be removed and disposed in
accordance section 2.1 of this report.
Paints were not tested for PCB content.
3.2 Asbestos
3.2.1 Bulk Samples
All accessible areas of the buildings that could be disturbed by planned work were inspected for
the presence of building materials suspected of containing asbestos and sampled where
appropriate and analysed for the presence of asbestos fibres.
Bulk samples of building materials suspected of containing asbestos were collected from a
number of areas in the buildings in accordance with WorkSafeBC requirements and analyzed to
determine the type and approximate content of asbestos.
Asbestos was found in the sheet flooring in the following locations:
Building Address
Unit Asbestos Location Condition Friable (Y/N)
Accessible
Action Level
(see Appendix 4)
James Yates
Gardens, 1150 Yates Street
Maintenance Closet
Chrysotile 20%
Sheet Flooring
Good Yes Yes (A) 5/7
Unit 2 Chrysotile
20%
Kitchen Sheet
Flooring Good Yes Yes (A) 5/7
Unit 4 Chrysotile
25%
Kitchen Sheet
Flooring Good Yes Yes (A) 5/7
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 8
Unit 5 Chrysotile
25%
Kitchen Sheet
Flooring Good Yes Yes (A) 5/7
Storage Unit 5
Chrysotile 20%
Sheet Flooring
Good Yes Yes (A) 5/7
See Appendix 4 for a description of the codes and keys used to determine the condition of asbestos containing material (ACM) and the action required to safely manage ACMs.
Figure 2: Action Matrix
CONDITION
ACCESS GOOD FAIR POOR DEBRIS
(A) ACTION 5/7 ACTION 5/6 ACTION 3 ACTION 1
(B) ACTION 7 ACTION 6/5 ACTION 3 ACTION 1
(C) exposed ACTION 7 ACTION 6 ACTION 4 ACTION 2
(C) concealed ACTION 7 ACTION 7 ACTION 4 ACTION 2
(D) ACTION 7 ACTION 7 ACTION 7 ACTION 7
Figure 3: Action Key
Action
5
Proactive ACM Removal Remove ACM in lieu of repair, or at locations where the presence of asbestos in
GOOD condition is not desirable.
Action
7
Routine Surveillance Institute routine surveillance of the ACM. Trained workers or contractors must
use appropriate asbestos precaution during disturbance of the remaining ACM.
Note: any additional suspect materials encountered during demolition activities must be left undisturbed until testing determines the presence or absence of asbestos or other hazardous material. In the event they are damaged or otherwise impacted, all work shall stop until appropriate control can be put in place to protect workers and the public.
3.3 Mercury
Mercury containing thermostats should be removed prior to renovation or demolition and be
packaged for transport and storage or disposal/destruction at a licensed facility. Alternatively, if
functional, these units could be re-used for their original intended purpose.
Mercury is also found in fluorescent light tubes. Caution should be exercised to ensure light
tubes are not broken, releasing droplets of mercury.
3.4 Arsenic
Wood likely to have been preserved with arsenical pesticides was not observed on the subject
site.
3.5 Ozone-depleting Substances (CFCs/ODS)
Equipment that may use chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) or ozone-depleting substances (ODS) were
observed in the buildings.
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 9
In the case of demolition, these materials will require proper recovery and disposal. The BC
Ozone-Depleting Substances Regulations would also apply to any CFC/ODS abatement
procedures. These regulations require that all ODS must be collected, stored and recycled, or
collected and disposed accordingly.
3.6 Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation
No sampling was undertaken for Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation (UFFI) as materials
suspected of containing UFFI were not observed in the buildings.
3.7 Radioactive Materials
Although smoke detectors containing sealed 241
Americium sources were not observed in the
buildings, some may be present. Smoke detectors that may be removed during any planned
work should be collected and disposed in accordance with Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
regulations.
3.8 Aboveground Storage Tanks
No aboveground tanks were observed. The conducting of a Stage 1 Preliminary Site
Investigation was beyond the scope of this report.
3.9 Lead
3.9.1 Lead Paint
Painted surfaces such as window frames and original wood exterior coatings are suspected to
contain lead. Lead based, or containing paints were commonly used during the era of
construction for these buildings and all original surface coatings should be considered to be lead.
3.9.2 Elemental Lead
No sources of elemental lead were observed. If lead materials are found they are typically
recognized as having significant salvage value, disposal therefore should not be a major concern.
Workers should exercise caution if heat is to be used to melt any lead found as means of
facilitating its extraction. Molten lead can produce significant quantities of inhalable lead fume
which can pose a severe health hazard. The BC Occupational Health and Safety Regulation
requires that worker exposure to airborne lead be kept below 0.05 mg/m3.
Lead within the copper water pipes/fittings was not tested for lead content however lead content
in solder, especially from buildings of this vintage, is known to reach levels up to 98% lead.
3.10 Hantavirus – Rodent Droppings
Rodent droppings were not observed. If rodent droppings are encountered during renovations or demolition, then the Contractor should develop and follow a worker hantavirus program. The contractor must provide worker instruction on the hazards of rodent droppings and other biohazardous materials, including the types of respirators and protective clothing to be worn.
3.11 Silica
All concrete, plaster and stucco is suspected of containing silica in crystalline and non-crystalline
forms. Many of the removal techniques (grinding, cutting, chipping etc) for these materials can
generate high levels of crystalline silica in the air. Use wetting techniques and/or HEPA equipped
extraction systems attached to drills and other power equipment where possible in order to
decrease dust levels.
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 10
3.12 Mould
Mould was not observed within the buildings. If mould is encountered during renovations or
demolition, work should stop and a risk assessment per WorkSafeBC Guidelines G4.79 (Moulds
and indoor air quality) be conducted.
Table 1: Guide for Removing Visible Mould Growth in the Indoor Environment
Extent of Visible and Hidden Mould Growth (surface area)
Minimum Recommended PPE1 Control Measures to Prevent Dust or
Spore Dispersion2
Small Total surface area affected is less
than 1 square metre (10 square feet)
N95 respirator or half face piece respirator with HEPA filters, gloves,
and goggles.
Isolation of the work area; wet wiping or misting of surfaces with water containing a surfactant (wetting agent); and the use of drop sheets to prevent dispersion of dust
and spores. Material is removed with minimum of dust and spore dispersal and
placed in a plastic bag and sealed.
Medium Total surface area affected is
between 1 square metre and 10 square metres (10 square feet to 100
square feet)
N95 respirator or half face piece respirator with HEPA filters, gloves, disposable coveralls, and goggles.
Limited containment: use polyethylene sheeting ceiling to floor around the
affected area with a slit entry and covering flap. Maintain area under negative pressure with HEPA filtered negative air unit. Block
supply and return air vents within the containment area.
Large Total surface area is greater than 10 square metres (100 square feet) or
the potential for increased occupant or remediator exposure during remediation is estimated to be
significant.
Full face piece or powered air purifying respirator (PAPR) with HEPA filters, gloves, disposable coveralls
(covering head and boots), and goggles.
Full containment: use of critical barriers. Maintain area under negative pressure with HEPA filtered fan unit exhausted outside the building. Block supply and return air
vents within the containment area. Provide facilities and procedures for
decontamination and personal hygiene.
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 11
4 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings, the recommendations are:
1. Provide copies of this report to site personnel, including contractors. A copy of the survey must be immediately available at the site whenever workers are present.
2. The contractor shall have an exposure control plan in place for each hazardous substance identified in this report as being in way of the planned work.
3. Work must STOP if suspect materials are encountered during renovations and/or demolition activities. These suspect materials must be left undisturbed until testing determines the presence or absence of asbestos or other hazardous materials. In addition, work must also STOP in the event these suspect materials are disturbed inadvertently.
4. All asbestos containing materials with the potential to be impacted by the work must be removed from the buildings prior or protected from damage prior to the commencement of construction and/or demolition work. This work, called asbestos abatement, must be undertaken following procedures acceptable to the WorkSafeBC which comply with the BC Occupational Health and Safety regulation and conform to the guideline Safe Practises for Handling Asbestos.
5. Workers should use caution to avoid activities such as sanding or heat stripping of paints containing lead, arsenic or mercury since such activities can create airborne dusts and fumes in concentrations that may pose an inhalation hazard.
6. Should rodent droppings be encountered, the contractor must provide worker instruction on the hazards of rodent droppings and other biohazardous materials, including the types of respirators and protective clothing to be worn.
7. Each fluorescent light fixture removed during demolition or renovation should have the ballast checked to determine if it contains PCB. Ballasts containing PCB must be removed, sorted and transported to a licensed facility.
8. Mould was not observed in the buildings. If encountered it must be removed as per WorkSafeBC 4.12: Table 1.
9. Mercury containing thermostats should be removed prior to demolition or renovation and be packaged for transport and storage or disposal/destruction at a licensed facility. Alternatively, the thermostat, if functional, could be re-used for its original intended purpose.
10. Smoke detectors should be collected and disposed in accordance with Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission regulations prior to renovations or demolition.
11. Workers should use caution to avoid creating airborne silica dust while removing concrete and stucco. Use wetting techniques and/or HEPA equipped extraction systems attached to drills and other power equipment where possible in order to decrease dust levels.
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 12
5 CLOSURE
This survey and assessment report has been prepared exclusively for the client. It is a statement
of the presence and condition of asbestos-containing materials and other hazardous materials as
outlined in the report and as observed on the date this survey was conducted. The conclusions
and recommendations contained in this assessment report are based upon professional opinions
with regard to the subject matter. These opinions are in accordance with accepted hygiene
assessment standards and practices applicable to these locations and are subject to the following
inherent limitations:
The data and findings presented in this report are valid as of the date of the investigation. The
passage of time, manifestation of latent conditions or occurrence of future events may warrant
further exploration at the properties, analysis of the data, and re-evaluation of the findings,
observations, and conclusions expressed in this report.
The data reported and the findings, observations and conclusions expressed in this report are
limited by the Scope of Work. The Scope of Work was defined by the request of the client, the
time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and availability of access to the properties.
A stage 1 Preliminary Site Investigation was not part of our scope of work.
Because of the limitations stated above, the findings, observations and conclusions expressed by
North West in this report are not, and should not be, considered an opinion concerning
compliance of any past or present owner or operator of the site with any federal, provincial or
local laws or regulations.
No warranty or guarantee, whether expressed or implied, is made with respect to the data or the
reported findings, observations, and conclusions, which are based solely upon site conditions in
existence at the time of investigation.
This report may not be used, relied upon, copied, published, or quoted by any party without the
written consent of North West Environmental Group, Ltd. Other parties reading this report must
independently verify the completeness and accuracy of this report and its contents.
This report is not intended for use as a scope of work for removal or as a specification section for inclusion in Tender Documents. Any unauthorized use of this report in that fashion is at the sole discretion and liability of the Owner.
Julie Scott-Moncrieff, B.Sc., Senior Occupational Hygienist
Bill Sullivan, B.Sc. President
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 13
APPENDIX 1 Photographs
Sample: 13890 – 01 & – 04 Unit/Location: Front Lobby Description: Floor Tile and Mastic, Black and Blue 12”x12” Asbestos: None Detected
Sample: 13890 - 02 Unit/Location: Front Lobby Description: Ceiling Texture Coat Asbestos: None Detected
Sample: 13890 - 05 Unit/Location: Maintenance Closet Description: Drywall Joint Compound Asbestos: None Detected
Sample: 13890 - 06 Unit/Location: Maintenance Closet Description: Ceiling Texture Coat Asbestos: None Detected
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 14
Sample: 13890 – 07 Layer 1 Unit/Location: Maintenance Closet Description: Sheet Flooring, Beige/Brown Asbestos: contains asbestos
Sample: 13890 – 07 Layer 2 Unit/Location: Maintenance Closet Description: Sheet Flooring, Mastic Asbestos: None Detected
Sample: 13890 - 08 Unit/Location: First Floor Hallway Description: Drywall Joint Compound Asbestos: None Detected
Sample: 13890 – 09 Unit/Location: First Floor Hallway Description: Ceiling Texture Coat Asbestos: None Detected
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 15
Sample: 13890 – 10 Layer 1 Unit/Location: Unit 2 Kitchen Description: Sheet Flooring, Lt. Grey & Beige/Brown Asbestos: Chrysotile (20%)
Sample: 13890 – 17 Layer 1 Unit/Location: Unit 4 Kitchen Description: Sheet Flooring, Lt. Grey & Beige/Brown Asbestos: Chrysotile (25%)
Sample: 13890 - 13 Unit/Location: Electrical Room Description: Drywall Joint Compound Asbestos: None Detected
Sample: 13890 - 14 Unit/Location: First Floor Stairwell (North) Description: Ceiling Texture Coat Asbestos: None Detected
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 16
Sample: 13890 - 18 Unit/Location: Unit 4 Hallway Description: Ceiling Texture Coat Asbestos: None Detected
Sample: 13890 - 19 Unit/Location: Unit 5 Hallway Description: Drywall Joint Compound Asbestos: None Detected
Sample: 13890 – 20 Unit/Location: Unit 5 Hallway Description: Ceiling Texture Coat Asbestos: None Detected
Sample: 13890 - 21 Unit/Location: Unit 5 Laundry Description: Sheet Floor, Off-White Asbestos: None Detected
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 17
Sample: 13890 – 22 Layer 1 Unit/Location: Unit 5 Kitchen Description: Sheet Flooring, Lt. Grey & Beige/Brown Asbestos: Chrysotile (25%)
Sample: 13890 – 24 Layer 1 Unit/Location: Unit 5 Storage Unit Description: Sheet Flooring, Beige/Brown Asbestos: Chrysotile (20%)
Sample: 13890 – 26 Unit/Location: Building Exterior Description: Stucco (1) Trowelled Texture Asbestos: None Detected
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 18
APPENDIX 2 Sampling Locations
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 19
DWJC
#210 – 2950 Douglas St.
Victoria, BC V8T 4N4
PROJECT NO.: 13890
DATE: 24/08/2011
SURVEYED BY: KW/JT
DRAWING NO.: 001
ADDRESS/LOCATION:
1150 Yates Street
DRAWING TITLE:
Main Floor
LEGEND ASBESTOS
DRAWING NOT TO SCALE
123
123
None Detected
Material Contains Asbestos
Drywall Joint Compound
13890 – 08 DWJC
Electrical Room
Bike Room
Lobby
13890 – 01 Black Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic
13890 – 02 Ceiling Texture Coat
13890 – 04 Blue Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic
13890 – 08 DWJC
13890 – 09 Ceiling Texture Coat
Maintenance Room
13890 – 13 DWJC
13890 – 15 DWJC
13890 – 14 Ceiling Texture Coat
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 20
DWJC
#210 – 2950 Douglas St.
Victoria, BC V8T 4N4
PROJECT NO.: 13890
DATE: 24/08/2011
SURVEYED BY: KW/JT
DRAWING NO.: 002
ADDRESS/LOCATION:
1150 Yates Street
DRAWING TITLE:
Exterior Rooms
LEGEND ASBESTOS
DRAWING NOT TO SCALE
123
123
None Detected
Material Contains Asbestos
Drywall Joint Compound
Bike Room
Maintenance Room
13890 – 05 DJWC
13890 – 06 Ceiling Texture Coat
13890 – 07 Beige/Brown Sheet Floor (Layer 1)
13890 – 07 Mastic (Layer 2)
13890 – 27 Stucco –Rough Texture
13890 – 26 Stucco –Troweled Texture
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 21
13890 – 11 DWJC
DWJC
#210 – 2950 Douglas St.
Victoria, BC V8T 4N4
PROJECT NO.: 13890
DATE: 24/08/2011
SURVEYED BY: KW/JT
DRAWING NO.: 003
ADDRESS/LOCATION:
1150 Yates Street
DRAWING TITLE:
Unit 2
LEGEND ASBESTOS
DRAWING NOT TO SCALE
123
123
None Detected
Material Contains Asbestos
Drywall Joint Compound
13890 – 10 Mastic (Layer 2)
Living Room
Hot Water Room
Clo
set
Bathroom
Kitchen
Bedroom
13890 – 10 Lt. Grey & Beige/Brown Sheet Floor (Layer 1)
13890 – 12 Ceiling Texture Coat
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 22
13890 – 18 Ceiling Texture Coat
DWJC
#210 – 2950 Douglas St.
Victoria, BC V8T 4N4
PROJECT NO.: 13890
DATE: 24/08/2011
SURVEYED BY: KW/JT
DRAWING NO.: 004
ADDRESS/LOCATION:
1150 Yates Street
DRAWING TITLE:
Unit 4
LEGEND ASBESTOS
DRAWING NOT TO SCALE
123
123
None Detected
Material Contains Asbestos
DWJC
13890 – 16 DWJC
Kitchen
Living Room
Bathroom
Bedroom
Bedroom
Laundry Room
Closets
13890 – 17 Lt. Grey & Beige/Brown Sheet Floor (Layer 1)
13890 – 17 Mastic (Layer 2)
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 23
13890 – 20 Ceiling Texture Coat
DWJC
#210 – 2950 Douglas St.
Victoria, BC V8T 4N4
PROJECT NO.: 13890
DATE: 24/08/2011
SURVEYED BY: KW/JT
DRAWING NO.: 005
ADDRESS/LOCATION:
1150 Yates Street
DRAWING TITLE:
Unit 5
LEGEND ASBESTOS
DRAWING NOT TO SCALE
123
123
None Detected
Material Contains Asbestos
Drywall Joint Compound
13890 – 19 DWJC
KitchenLiving Room
Bathroom
Bedroom
Bedroom
Laundry Room
Closets
13890 – 22 Lt. Grey & Beige/Brown Sheet Floor (Layer 1)
13890 – 22 Mastic (Layer 2)
13890 – 21 Off White Vinyl Sheet Floor
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 24
13890 – 25 Ceiling Texture Coat
DWJC
#210 – 2950 Douglas St.
Victoria, BC V8T 4N4
PROJECT NO.: 13890
DATE: 24/08/2011
SURVEYED BY: KW/JT
DRAWING NO.: 006
ADDRESS/LOCATION:
1150 Yates Street
DRAWING TITLE:
Second Floor
LEGEND ASBESTOS
DRAWING NOT TO SCALE
123
123
None Detected
Material Contains Asbestos
Drywall Joint Compound
13890 – 23 DWJC
Storage 5 Storage 4
13890 – 24 Mastic (Layer 2)
13890 – 24 Beige/Brown Vinyl Sheet Floor (Layer 1)
James Yates Gardens, 1150 Yates Street Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011
Page 25
APPENDIX 3 Sample Report
Client: Capital Regional Housing CorporationKW
Site: James Yates Gardens - 1150 Yates St.4 3 5 10 11 6 12
1314 15 16 1 7
Sample Number
Location Date Analysed
Analyst Description Phase % Asbestos % Other Materials %
13890-01Layer 1 Front Lobby 08/26/11 EM Black Vinyl Floor Tile 12"
x 12"Black Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 50 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-01Layer 2 Front Lobby 08/26/11 EM Mastic Yellow Fibrous
Heterogeneous 50 None Detected 0 0 Non-FibrousCellulose
973
13890-02 Front Lobby 08/26/11 EM Ceiling Texture Coat White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-03 Front Lobby 08/26/11 EM Drywall Joint Compound White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-04Layer 1 Front Lobby 08/26/11 EM Blue Vinyl Floor Tile 12" x
12"Blue Non-Fibrous Homogeneous 50 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-04Layer 2 Front Lobby 08/26/11 EM Mastic Yellow Fibrous
Heterogeneous 50 None Detected 0 0 Non-FibrousCellulose
955
13890-05 Maintenance Closet 08/26/11 EM Drywall Joint Compound White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-06 Maintenance Closet 08/26/11 EM Ceiling Texture Coat White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-07Layer 1 Maintenance Closet 08/26/11 EM Beige/Brown Vinyl Sheet
FlooringGrey/Tan Fibrous Heterogeneous 50 Chrysotile 0 20 Non-Fibrous
Cellulose6020
13890-07Layer 2 Maintenance Closet 08/26/11 EM Mastic Tan Non-Fibrous
Heterogenous 50 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-08 1st Floor Hallway 08/26/11 EM Drywall Joint Compound White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-09 1st Floor Hallway 08/26/11 EM Ceiling Texture Coat Grey Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
August 29, 2011
13890Sampled by:/Client Job or PO #
Project Number
#210 - 2950 Douglas StreetVictoria, B.C. V8T 4N4
Tel:250-384-9695Fax:250-384-9865
e-mail:[email protected]
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials using Polarized Light Microscopy
Note: Samples were analyzed by method: EPA/600/R- 93/116 "Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy". For heterogeneous materials the concentrations may vary. No reproduction without permission. Page 1
Client: Capital Regional Housing CorporationKW
Site: James Yates Gardens - 1150 Yates St.4 3 5 10 11 6 12
1314 15 16 1 7
Sample Number
Location Date Analysed
Analyst Description Phase % Asbestos % Other Materials %
August 29, 2011
13890Sampled by:/Client Job or PO #
Project Number
#210 - 2950 Douglas StreetVictoria, B.C. V8T 4N4
Tel:250-384-9695Fax:250-384-9865
e-mail:[email protected]
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials using Polarized Light Microscopy
13890-10Layer 1 Unit 2 Kitchen 08/26/11 EM Lt. Grey & Beige/Brown
Vinyl Sheet Flooring Grey/Tan Fibrous Heterogeneous 50 Chrysotile 0 20 Non-Fibrous
Cellulose6515
13890-10Layer 2 Unit 2 Kitchen 08/26/11 EM Mastic Tan Non-Fibrous
Heterogenous 50 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-11 Unit 2 Bedroom 08/26/11 EM Drywall Joint Compound White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-12 Unit 2 Hallway 08/26/11 EM Ceiling Texture Coat White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-13 Electrical Room 08/26/11 EM Drywall Joint Compound White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-14 1st Floor Stairwell (North) 08/26/11 EM Ceiling Texture Coat White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-15 1st Floor Stairwell (North) 08/26/11 EM Drywall Joint Compound White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-16 Unit 4 Bedroom 08/26/11 EM Drywall Joint Compound White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-17Layer 1 Unit 4 Kitchen 08/26/11 EM Lt. Grey & Beige/Brown
Vinyl Sheet Flooring Grey Fibrous Heterogeneous 50 Chrysotile 0 25 Non-FibrousCellulose
5520
13890-17Layer 2 Unit 4 Kitchen 08/26/11 EM Mastic Tan Non-Fibrous
Heterogenous 50 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-18 Unit 4 Hallway 08/26/11 EM Ceiling Texture Coat Grey Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-19 Unit 5 Hallway 08/26/11 EM Drywall Joint Compound White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
Note: Samples were analyzed by method: EPA/600/R- 93/116 "Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy". For heterogeneous materials the concentrations may vary. No reproduction without permission. Page 2
Client: Capital Regional Housing CorporationKW
Site: James Yates Gardens - 1150 Yates St.4 3 5 10 11 6 12
1314 15 16 1 7
Sample Number
Location Date Analysed
Analyst Description Phase % Asbestos % Other Materials %
August 29, 2011
13890Sampled by:/Client Job or PO #
Project Number
#210 - 2950 Douglas StreetVictoria, B.C. V8T 4N4
Tel:250-384-9695Fax:250-384-9865
e-mail:[email protected]
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials using Polarized Light Microscopy
13890-20 Unit 5 Hallway 08/26/11 EM Ceiling Texture Coat Tan Non-Fibrous Heterogenous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-21 Unit 5 Laundry 08/26/11 EM Off White Vinyl Sheet Flooring Tan Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0
Non-FibrousCelluloseSynthetic
751510
13890-22Layer 1 Unit 5 Kitchen 08/26/11 EM Lt. Grey & Beige/Brown
Vinyl Sheet Flooring Grey Fibrous Heterogeneous 50 Chrysotile 0 25 Non-FibrousCellulose
5520
13890-22Layer 2 Unit 5 Kitchen 08/26/11 EM Mastic Tan Non-Fibrous
Heterogenous 50 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-23 Unit 5 Storage Unit 08/26/11 EM Drywall Joint Compound White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-24Layer 1 Unit 5 Storage Unit 08/26/11 EM Beige/Brown Vinyl Sheet
FlooringGrey/Tan Fibrous Heterogeneous 50 Chrysotile 0 20 Non-Fibrous 80
13890-24Layer 2 Unit 5 Storage Unit 08/26/11 EM Mastic Tan Non-Fibrous
Heterogenous 50 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-25 2nd Floor Hallway 08/26/11 EM Ceiling Texture Coat White Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-26 Exterior of Building 08/26/11 EM Stucco (2) - Troweled Texture
Grey Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
13890-27 Exterior of Building 08/26/11 EM Stucco (1) - Rough Texture
Grey Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous 100 None Detected 0 0 Non-Fibrous 100
Note: Samples were analyzed by method: EPA/600/R- 93/116 "Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy". For heterogeneous materials the concentrations may vary. No reproduction without permission. Page 3
Portage Place, 210 Island Highway Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011 Appendix 4: Evaluation of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM)
Evaluation of asbestos containing materials is based on the condition of the material and its accessibility.
Following are the guidelines used to evaluate ACMs and the action, if any, required to safely manage them.
Spray Applied Fireproofing, Insulation and Texture Finishes In evaluating the condition of ACM spray applied as fireproofing, thermal insulation or texture, decorative or acoustic finishes, the following criteria apply;
GOOD Surface of material shows no significant signs of damage, deterioration or delamination. Up to one percent visible damage to surface is allowed within range of GOOD. Evaluation of sprayed fireproofing requires the surveyor to be familiar with the irregular surface texture typical of sprayed asbestos products. GOOD condition includes unencapsulated or unpainted fireproofing or texture finishes, where no delamination or damage is observed, and encapsulated fireproofing or texture finishes where the encapsulation has been applied after the damage or fallout occurred.
POOR Sprayed materials show signs of damage, delamination or deterioration. More than one percent damage to surface of ACM spray.
Mechanical Insulation In evaluating the condition of mechanical insulation (on boilers, breeching, ductwork, piping, tanks, equipment etc.) the following criteria are used:
GOOD Insulation is completely covered in jacketing and exhibits no evidence of damage or deterioration. No insulation is exposed. Includes conditions where the jacketing has minor surface damage (i.e., scuffs or stains), but the jacketing is not penetrated.
FAIR Minor penetration damage to jacketed insulation (cuts, tears, nicks, deterioration or delamination) or undamaged insulation that has never been jacketed. Insulation is exposed but not showing surface disintegration. The extent of missing insulation ranges should be minor to none.
POOR Original insulation jacket is missing, damaged, deteriorated or delaminated. Insulation is exposed and significant areas have been dislodged. Damage cannot be readily repaired.
Non-Friable and Potentially Friable Materials Non-friable materials generally have little potential to release airborne fibres, even when damaged by mechanical breakage. However, some non-friable materials, i.e., exterior asbestos Concrete products, may have deteriorated so that the binder no longer effectively contains the asbestos fibres. In such cases of significantly deteriorated non-friable material, the material will be treated as a friable product.
Portage Place, 210 Island Highway Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011 Accessibility The accessibility of building materials known or suspected of being ACM is rated according to the following criteria:
Access (A) Areas of the building within reach (from floor level) of all building users. Includes areas such as gymnasiums, workshops, and storage areas where activities of the building users may results in disturbance of ACM not normally within reach from floor level.
Access (B) Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without need for a ladder. Includes: frequently entered pipe chases, tunnels and service areas or areas within reach from a fixed ladder or catwalk, i.e., tops of equipment, mezzanines.
Access (C) Exposed
Areas of the building above 8’0” where use of a ladder is required to reach the ACM. Only refers to ACM materials that are exposed to view, from the floor or ladder, without removing or opening other building components such as ceiling tiles, or service access doors or hatches. Does not include infrequently accessed service areas of the building.
Access (C) Concealed
Areas of the building which require removal of a building component including lay-in ceilings and access panels into solid ceiling systems. Includes rarely entered crawl spaces, attic spaces etc. Observations are limited to the extent visible from the access points.
Access (D) Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc., where demolition or the ceiling, wall or equipment etc., is required to reach the ACM. Evaluation of condition and extent of ACM is limited or impossible, depending on the surveyor’s ability to visually examine the materials in Access D.
Portage Place, 210 Island Highway Hazardous Materials Survey December 2011 Action Matrix The Action Matrix determines what, if any, action is required to safely manage ACMs.
Condition
Access Good Fair Poor Debris
(A) ACTION 5/7 ACTION 5/6 ACTION 3 ACTION 1
(B) ACTION 7 ACTION 6/5 ACTION 3 ACTION 1
(C) Exposed ACTION 7 ACTION 6 ACTION 4 ACTION 2
(C) Concealed ACTION 7 ACTION 7 ACTION 4 ACTION 2
(D) ACTION 7 ACTION 7 ACTION 7 ACTION 7
Action Table Following is a description of the action required to manage ACMs, based on the outcome of the evaluation.
Action 1
Immediate Clean Up of Debris That is Likely to be Disturbed Restrict access that is likely to cause a disturbance of the ACM DEBRIS and clean up ACM DEBRIS immediately. Utilize correct asbestos procedures. This action is required for compliance with regulatory requirements.
Action 2
Entry Into Areas with ACM Debris At locations where ACM DEBRIS can be isolated in lieu of removal or clean up, use appropriate means to limit entry to the area. Restrict access to the area to persons utilizing Type 2 asbestos-work precautions. The precautions will be required until the ACM DEBRIS has been cleaned up, and the source of the DEBRIS has been stabilized or removed.
Action 3
ACM Removal Required for Compliance Remove ACM for compliance with regulatory requirements. Utilize asbestos procedures appropriate to the scope of the removal work.
Action 4
Access into Areas Where ACM is Present and Likely to be Disturbed by Access Use asbestos precautions when entry or access into an area likely to disturb the ACM. ACTION 4 must be used until the ACM is removed (Use ACTION 1 or 2 if DEBRIS is present).
Action 5
Proactive ACM Removal Remove ACM in lieu of repair, or at locations where the presence of asbestos in GOOD condition is not desirable.
Action 6
ACM Repair Repair ACM found in FAIR condition, and not likely to be damaged again or disturbed by normal use of the area or room. Upon completion of the repair work, treat ACM as material in GOOD condition and implement ACTION 7. If ACM is likely to be damaged or disturbed during normal use of the area or room, implement ACTION 5.
Action 7
Routine Surveillance Institute routine surveillance of the ACM. Trained workers or contractors must use appropriate asbestos precaution during disturbance of the remaining ACM.