1
From SNEB From Reflection to Action. Perceptions, beliefs, attitudes, mean- ings, subjectivity. these terms appear in most of the research articles in this issue, reinforcing my own viewpoint on what makes nutrition education successful. It often requires food and nutrition educators to interact with people, helping them reect on their own food choices and what inuences them. Participants may come to realize that they have been choosing foods based on the values of others such as family members, society in general, or the food environment, rather than thinking about their own health. This type of reection is part of trans- formational or transformative learning. According to Jack Mezirow, the pioneer of this learning theory, ‘‘The process in- volves transforming frames of reference through critical reection of assump- tions, validating contested beliefs through discourse, taking action on one's reective insight, and critically assessing it.’’ 1 By helping people think about what they eat and why and offering alternatives for better health, lower cost, or more enjoyment, as well as skills and experiences to reinforce new attitudes, people are more likely to change their behaviors. But hands-on, face-to-face, rele- vant, and hopefully transformational nutrition education programming is labor-intensive and costly. In the United States, federally funded pro- grams such as EFNEP, SNAP-Ed and WIC frequently have to deal with budget cuts while public nutrition ed- ucation in many other countries often is inadequately funded. Advocacy is a major part of SNEB's mission, and advocating for funding for nutrition education research and programs is a high priority. The SNEB Advisory Committee on Public Policy actively encourages members to learn about priority issues, offering tips on work- ing with decision-makers and weekly policy updates to help inform and motivate members to get involved. 2 Please reect on how you can become an advocate to support nutrition edu- cation that works. Linda T. Drake, MS 2012-2013 President, Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior REFERENCES 1. Mezirow J. Transformative learning: theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. 1997; 1997(74):5-12. 2. Society for Nutrition Education and Be- havior. SNEB Advocacy in Action. http://www.sneb.org/advocacy/advoc acy.html. Accessed March 18, 2013. From JNEB Healthy Literacy, Nutrition Education, and Food Literacy Healthy People 2010 denes health lit- eracy as ‘‘the degree to which individ- uals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions.’’ 1 Similarly, according to the Eat Well South Australia project, food literacy is the ‘‘capacity of an individual to ob- tain, interpret and understand basic food and nutrition information and services as well as the competence to use that information and related ser- vices that are health enhancing.’’ 2 These denitions agree with those of the International Federation for Home Economics, that identied 3 components of health and food literacy as functional (knowledge), in- teractive (skills), and critical (transfor- mation and empowerment). 3 While nutrition education focuses on food intake and how the body utilizes nutri- ents for growth, development, and health, food literacy has a wider scope that ranges across food production, procurement, preparation, processing, packaging, and labeling to food choice and consumption. Whether the term is healthy literacy, nutrition educa- tion, or food literacy, deciphering nutrition information is clearly chal- lenging. Levin noted that most health education materials are too difcult for most to comprehend. 4 Seventeen years later, this may still be true. As nu- trition educators, it is our responsibil- ity to reduce the gap between the literacy level of our messages and the literacy levels of our audience by sys- tematically assessing their food liter- acy needs and providing education and skill training that is transforma- tional, relevant, and would stand tests of changing environment and unsta- ble economic conditions. Mary W. Murimi, PhD, RD, LDN Associate Editor REFERENCES 1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Under- standing and Improving Health. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000. 2. Vidgen H, Gallegos D. What is food liter- acy and does it influence what we eat: A study of Australian food experts. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology; 2011. 3. Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Social Science & Medicine. 2008;67:2072-2078. 4. Levin S. Pilot study of a cafeteria pro- gram relying primarily on symbols to promote healthy choices. J Nutr Educ. 1996;28:282-285.

Healthy Literacy, Nutrition Education, and Food Literacy

  • Upload
    mary-w

  • View
    217

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

From SNEBFrom Reflection to Action.

Perceptions, beliefs, attitudes, mean-ings, subjectivity. these terms appearin most of the research articles in thisissue, reinforcing my own viewpointon what makes nutrition educationsuccessful. It often requires food andnutrition educators to interact withpeople, helping them reflect on theirown food choices andwhat influencesthem. Participantsmay come to realizethat they have been choosing foodsbased on the values of others such asfamily members, society in general,or the food environment, rather thanthinking about their own health.

This typeof reflection ispart of trans-formational or transformative learning.According to JackMezirow, the pioneerof this learning theory, ‘‘The process in-volves transforming frames of referencethrough critical reflection of assump-tions, validating contested beliefsthrough discourse, taking action on

one's reflective insight, and criticallyassessing it.’’1 By helping people thinkabout what they eat and why andoffering alternatives for better health,lower cost, or more enjoyment, as wellas skills and experiences to reinforcenew attitudes, people are more likelyto change their behaviors.

But hands-on, face-to-face, rele-vant, and hopefully transformationalnutrition education programming islabor-intensive and costly. In theUnited States, federally funded pro-grams such as EFNEP, SNAP-Ed andWIC frequently have to deal withbudget cuts while public nutrition ed-ucation inmany other countries oftenis inadequately funded. Advocacy isa major part of SNEB's mission, andadvocating for funding for nutritioneducation research and programs isa high priority. The SNEB AdvisoryCommittee on Public Policy actively

encourages members to learn aboutpriority issues, offering tips on work-ing with decision-makers and weeklypolicy updates to help inform andmotivate members to get involved.2

Please reflect on how you can becomean advocate to support nutrition edu-cation that works.

Linda T. Drake, MS2012-2013 President, Society forNutrition Education and Behavior

REFERENCES

1. Mezirow J. Transformative learning:theory to practice. New Directions forAdult and Continuing Education. 1997;1997(74):5-12.

2. Society for Nutrition Education and Be-havior. SNEB Advocacy in Action.http://www.sneb.org/advocacy/advocacy.html. Accessed March 18, 2013.

From JNEBHealthy Literacy, Nutrition Education, and Food Literacy

Healthy People 2010 defines health lit-eracy as ‘‘the degree to which individ-uals have the capacity to obtain,process, and understand basic healthinformation and services needed tomake appropriate health decisions.’’1

Similarly, according to the Eat WellSouth Australia project, food literacy isthe ‘‘capacity of an individual to ob-tain, interpret and understand basicfood and nutrition information andservices as well as the competence touse that information and related ser-vices that are health enhancing.’’2

These definitions agree with those ofthe International Federation forHome Economics, that identified 3components of health and foodliteracy as functional (knowledge), in-teractive (skills), and critical (transfor-mation and empowerment).3 Whilenutrition education focuses on foodintake andhow thebodyutilizes nutri-

ents for growth, development, andhealth, food literacy has a wider scopethat ranges across food production,procurement, preparation, processing,packaging, and labeling to food choiceand consumption. Whether the termis healthy literacy, nutrition educa-tion, or food literacy, decipheringnutrition information is clearly chal-lenging. Levin noted that most healtheducationmaterials are toodifficult formost to comprehend.4 Seventeenyears later, thismay still be true. As nu-trition educators, it is our responsibil-ity to reduce the gap between theliteracy level of our messages and theliteracy levels of our audience by sys-tematically assessing their food liter-acy needs and providing educationand skill training that is transforma-tional, relevant, and would stand testsof changing environment and unsta-ble economic conditions.

Mary W. Murimi, PhD, RD, LDNAssociate Editor

REFERENCES

1. US Department of Health and HumanServices. Healthy People 2010: Under-standing and Improving Health. 2nd ed.Washington, DC: US GovernmentPrinting Office; 2000.

2. Vidgen H, Gallegos D.What is food liter-acy and does it influence what we eat: Astudy of Australian food experts. Brisbane,Australia: Queensland University ofTechnology; 2011.

3. Nutbeam D. The evolving concept ofhealth literacy. Social Science & Medicine.2008;67:2072-2078.

4. Levin S. Pilot study of a cafeteria pro-gram relying primarily on symbols topromote healthy choices. J Nutr Educ.1996;28:282-285.