Upload
trinhduong
View
229
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Running head:
Heat stable proteome associated with desiccation tolerance
Correspondence:
Dr O. LEPRINCE
UMR Physiologie Moléculaire des Semences
ARES
16 bd Lavoisier
F-49045 Angers
France
Tel : + 33 241 22 55 16
Fax : + 33 241 22 55 49
E-mail [email protected]
Research area:
Environmental Stress and Adaptation
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on February 3, 2006, as DOI:10.1104/pp.105.074039
Copyright 2006 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
Comparative analysis of the heat stable proteome of radicles of
Medicago truncatula seeds during germination identifies late
embryogenesis abundant proteins associated with desiccation
tolerance
Julie Boudet, Julia Buitink, Folkert A. Hoekstra, Hélène Rogniaux, Colette
Larré, Pascale Satour, and Olivier Leprince
Unité Mixte de Recherche 1191 « Physiologie Moléculaire des Semences (Université
d’Angers, Institut National d’Horticulture, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique) »,
Anjou Recherche Semences, 16 boulevard Lavoisier, 49045 Angers, France (J.B., P.S., O.L.);
Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University,
Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD Wageningen, The Netherlands (F.A.H.); Unité de Recherche
« Biopolymères, Interactions, Allergie » (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique), rue
de la Géraudière, BP 71624, 44316 Nantes (H.R., C.L.)
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
This work was supported in parts by grants from the Contrat de Plan Etat-Région-des Pays-
de-la Loire 2000-2006, INRA and Van Gogh NWO/EGIDE.
Corresponding author; e-mail [email protected]; fax 33-2-41-22-55-49.
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this
article in accordance with journal policy is: O. Leprince, [email protected]
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
A proteomic analysis was performed on the heat stable protein fraction of imbibed
radicles of Medicago truncatula seeds to investigate whether proteins can be identified
that are specifically linked to desiccation tolerance (DT). Radicles were compared before
and after emergence (2.8-mm long) in association with the loss of DT, and after
reinduction of DT by an osmotic treatment. To separate proteins induced by the osmotic
treatment from those linked with DT, the comparison was extended to 5-mm long
emerged radicles for which DT could no longer be re-induced, albeit that drought
tolerance was increased. The abundance of 15 polypeptides was linked with DT, out of
which 11 were identified as LEA proteins from different groups: MtEm6 (group 1), one
isoform of DHN3 (dehydrins), MtPM25 (group 5) and three members of group 3: MP2,
an isoform of PM18 and all the isoforms of SBP65. In silico analysis revealed that their
expression is likely seed-specific, except for DHN3. Other isoforms of DNH3 and PM18
as well as 3 isoforms of the dehydrin Budcar5 were associated with drought tolerance.
Changes in the abundance of MtEm6 and MtPM25 in imbibed cotyledons during the
loss of DT and in developing embryos during the acquisition of DT confirmed the link of
these two proteins with DT. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed that the
recombinant MtPM25 and MtEm6 exhibited a certain degree of order in the hydrated
state, but that they became more structured by adopting α-helices and β sheets during
drying. A model is presented in which DT-linked LEA proteins might exert different
protective functions at high and low hydration levels.
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
1
Desiccation tolerance corresponds to the ability to survive nearly complete protoplasmic
dehydration (ca. –300 MPa). This phenomenon is widespread across the plant kingdom,
including ferns, mosses, pollen and seeds as well as several whole angiosperms, the so-called
resurrection plants. In orthodox seeds, DT is acquired during maturation approximately
halfway through the seed filling phase. Upon seed imbibition, emerging radicles are the first
to lose their ability to tolerate air drying, followed by hypocotyls and cotyledons (Buitink et
al., 2003). At the seedling stage, tissues can no longer survive great losses of moisture. To
cope with the physical and biochemical challenges accompanying the desiccation process,
anhydrobiotes (i.e. desiccation-tolerant organisms) are endowed with an array of protective
mechanisms that act synergistically. They include the synthesis of protective molecules, the
ability to avoid free-radical induced injury during drying and the capacity to repress
metabolism in a coordinated fashion (Leprince et al., 2000; Walters et al., 2002; Avelange-
Macherel et al., 2005). The protective molecules identified and characterized so far are non-
reducing di- and oligosaccharides (Hoekstra et al., 2001; Buitink et al., 2002), small heat
shock proteins (Wehmeyer and Vierling, 2000) and late embryogenesis abundant (LEA)
proteins (Cuming, 1999).
LEA proteins are classified in at least 5 groups by virtue of similarity in their amino acid
sequences (Cuming, 1999; Wise, 2003). They are low complexity, highly hydrophilic and
mostly unordered proteins in the hydrated state and heat stable after boiling (Cuming, 1999;
Wise 2003). Generally, the presence of LEA proteins correlates well with DT. LEA proteins
accumulate to high levels in developing seeds during late maturation (Blackman et al., 1995;
Cuming, 1999; Buitink et al., 2002) and in dehydrating vegetative tissues of resurrection
plants (Ramanjulu and Bartels, 2002). Correlations between the disappearance of various
members of group 1, 2 and 3 LEA proteins and loss of DT during germination have also been
reported (Ried and Walker-Simmons, 1993, Whitsitt et al., 1997; Capron et al., 2000;
Gallardo et al., 2001). Seeds of the double mutant aba,abi3 of Arabidopsis that are deficient
in several heat stable polypeptides are also desiccation-sensitive, although they exhibit an
array of pleiotropic defects ranging from decreased accumulation of storage proteins to
vivipary (Meurs et al., 1992). A role of LEA proteins in DT has been demonstrated in the
bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Inactivation of a group 3 LEA protein, homologue of
the plant LEA76, leads to 75% reduction in viability of desiccated cultures (Battista et al.,
2001). In contrast, in seeds, direct in vivo evidence for a role of LEA proteins in tolerance to
complete water loss has not yet been secured. There exist several Arabidopsis mutants that
produce seeds devoid of one or two LEA proteins belonging to group 1, but remaining
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
desiccation-tolerant (Carles et al., 2002), either arguing against a role for these proteins in DT
or revealing a possible functional redundancy between the different group members as
suggested by Ditzer et al. (2001). Conversely, dehydrins have been detected in seeds that
remain desiccation sensitive at shedding (Kermode, 1997). Nonetheless, in vitro experiments
do point to a protective role of LEA proteins against the deleterious effects of drying. For
instance, several LEA proteins from group 2, 3 and 4 were found to protect enzymes against
nearly complete loss of water brought about by rapid evaporation or vacuum drying (Goyal et
al., 2005; Grelet et al., 2005).
In addition to being present in anhydrobiotes, LEA proteins are also expressed in
desiccation-sensitive vegetative tissues as a response to stress involving changes in cellular
water potential (Cuming, 1999). Most of the experimental evidence shows that LEA proteins
that are over-expressed in vegetative tissues can improve tolerance to various degrees of
hyperosmotic stress (-1 to -6 MPa), induced by a partial loss of water, salt or freezing (Imai et
al., 1996; Swire-Clark and Marcotte, 1999; Cheng et al., 2002; Houde et al., 2004; Riera et
al., 2004). Whether LEA proteins play a similar role in seeds as they do in drought-tolerant
systems is unclear. LEA proteins are extremely diversified in terms of genotypic variability,
regulation, localization at the tissue and cellular level (Dure 1993; Cuming, 1999; Wise,
2003). Several LEA genes appear to be specifically expressed in seeds, such as the Em1 and
Em6 in Arabidopsis (group 1; Bies et al., 1998) and rab28 (group 5) in Arabidopsis (Arenas-
Mena et al., 1999) and maize (Niogret et al., 1996). When these genes are over-expressed in
desiccation-sensitive systems such as yeast (Swire-Clark and Marcotte, 1999), leaves of rice
(Cheng et al., 2002) and Arabidopsis seedlings (Borrell et al., 2002), an improved tolerance to
salt or drought is observed. During drying, seed tissues pass through hydration ranges that
also necessitate protection against drought. Thus, it can be argued that, in seeds, the role of
LEA proteins might be similar as in drought-tolerant vegetative tissues, their action being
confined to relatively high water contents (ca. -3.5 MPa; Hoekstra et al., 2001; Ramanjulu
and Bartels, 2002). In this case, no LEA proteins would be found to be specifically correlated
with tolerance to low water contents. Alternatively, they might exert several functions that
differ according to the hydration level reached by the seed tissues during drying, as is the case
for non-reducing sugars (Hoekstra et al., 2001; Ramanjulu and Bartels, 2002). Sugars are
thought to act as compatible solutes during the initial water loss and when the bulk water is
removed, they protect macromolecules by replacing water with OH groups and by forming a
glass, which stabilizes the macromolecular structures for long periods of time (Hoekstra et al.,
2001). Similarly, apart from their protective role in drought conditions, LEA proteins have
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
been shown in vitro to prevent conformational changes of hydrophilic polypeptides when the
last hydration layer is removed (Wolkers et al., 2001) and to participate in the formation of a
glassy state, occurring at a water content below 0.10 g/g (g H2O/ g dry weight; Wolkers et al.,
2001; Shih et al., 2004). Therefore, this study investigates if there exist specific LEA proteins
whose abundance is associated with DT rather than drought tolerance in Medicago truncatula
seeds.
To comprehend the changes in LEA proteins simultaneously, comparative proteomic
analysis was carried out in desiccation-tolerant and -sensitive radicles during germination. In
addition, this approach allows to assess whether putative posttranslational modifications are
also associated with DT, considering that some LEA proteins from group 1, 2 and 3 are
submitted to post-transcriptional and post-translational modifications during seed maturation
and germination (Bies et al., 1998; Campalans et al., 2000). Furthermore, the phosphorylation
status of the acidic dehydrins was found to determine the protective activity (Riera et al.,
2004; Alsheikh et al., 2005). To facilitate the detection of LEA proteins, we focussed on the
heat stable proteome that resist coagulation upon heating at 95°C. By this method, the soluble
protein extract containing hydrophilic proteins should be enriched with LEA proteins and
devoid of storage proteins, which can represent up to 60% of the total proteome of M.
truncatula seeds (Gallardo et al., 2003; Watson et al., 2003). Apart from LEA proteins, other,
unidentified proteins with protective functions might be present in the heat stable fraction.
This is based on a recent argumentation that LEA proteins are members of a larger family of
osmotic stress proteins called “hydrophilins”, which are defined as proteins have a Gly
content > 6% and a hydrophylicity index > 1 (Garay-Arroyo et al., 2000).
Several transcriptomic and proteomic analyses both during seed development (Gallardo et
al., 2003; Hajduch et al., 2005) and germination (Gallardo et al., 2001; Soeda et al., 2005)
have given some insights into several seed-specific events such as synthesis of storage
reserves, desiccation, radicle protrusion and germination performance. Although several stress
proteins were identified, their abundance was not studied in relation to DT. In our work,
profiles of heat stable proteins were compared between desiccation-tolerant radicles of non-
germinated seeds and sensitive radicles after emergence out of the seed coat. To confirm the
link with DT, profiles were also studied in emerged radicles in which DT was re-established.
This can be brought about by exposing germinated seeds to an osmotic treatment for several
days (Leprince et al., 2000; Buitink et al., 2003). Those proteins that were expressed in treated
radicles upon re-establishment of DT were further analyzed in older emerged radicles, for
which DT can no longer be re-induced by the osmotic treatment. This strategy allowed for the
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
discrimination of putative proteins linked to DT and osmotic tolerance. Eleven polypeptides
representing several forms of LEA proteins were found to be associated with DT. Among
them, two proteins belonging to group 1 and group 5 were further characterized during
maturation and germination by western blotting. To gain further insights into their function,
their secondary structure was compared in the hydrated and dry state after fast and slow
drying using FTIR (Fourier transform IR) spectroscopy.
RESULTS
Changes in Heat Stable Protein Patterns in Relation to the Loss and Re-establishment of
Desiccation Tolerance
In seeds of M. truncatula, DT of the radicle is maintained during the early phase of imbibition
and is lost when the radicle protrudes the seed coat (Table I). Germinated seeds with 2.8 mm
long protruded radicles are not able to survive a 3 d drying at 42% RH at 20°C (Table I).
Previously, Buitink et al. (2003) showed that DT can be re-established in these sensitive
radicles by incubating the germinated seeds in a solution of polyethylene glycol (PEG) having
a water potential of -1.7 MPa for 2 d. Table I shows that in these conditions, DT was restored
to 91% in 2.8 mm long emerged radicles. However, when germinated seeds are selected at a
later stage during post-germinative growth, corresponding to seeds with protruded radicles of
5 mm in length, DT can no longer be re-established after the same PEG treatment (Table I).
To identify proteins involved in DT, we compared the heat stable (HS) proteome extracted
from 2.8 mm long, desiccation-sensitive radicles with those from 16 h imbibed non-
germinated desiccation-tolerant radicles. To validate whether putative candidates were linked
to DT, the HS proteome was also analyzed from PEG-treated 2.8 mm radicles, in which DT
was re-established. In non-germinated (NG) radicles, the weight fraction of the HS proteome
corresponded to 28% of the total soluble proteins. During germination, the amount of HS
proteins decreased 2.3-fold (Table I). The osmotic treatment did not reverse this decrease; the
amount of HS proteins in PEG-treated radicles represented 15% of the total soluble proteins.
The HS fractions from the 3 stages were analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis
(2DE) using a non-linear pI gradient (Fig. 1). For each stage, the spots from 6 to 8 replicates
were detected and compared to each other using the PD Quest software. To secure the quality
of the data, spots of poor quality and very low raw volumes were discarded using criteria set
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
by the software. Furthermore, to be included in the statistical analysis, each spot had to be
present in at least 50% of the gel replicates. In total, 391 spots satisfied these criteria and were
included in the reference gel. The number of detected spots differed significantly among the
stages (Table I). Concurrent with the decrease in the proportion of the HS fraction, the
number of spots decreased from 328 to 252 during the loss of DT (Table I). In contrast, the
PEG-induced re-establishment of DT led to a slight increase in the spot number (Table I). A
nested ANOVA and the Student-Newman-Keuls test (P < 0.05) classified 376 spots out of the
391 spots in 9 expression profiles (Table II). For the remaining 15 spots, the Student-
Newman-Keuls test did not reveal a significant difference in contrast to the nested ANOVA,
which gives a better estimate of the residual variance. Out of the 376 spots, only 54 remained
constant in the three stages (Table II). The profile with the highest number of spots (profile 2)
represented those spots that were more abundant in the desiccation-tolerant, NG stage
compared to the other two stages. Only 5.9% (23) of the total detected spots had an
expression profile associated with DT, that is, they were significantly more abundant in NG
and PEG-treated 2.8 mm radicles than in the untreated, 2.8 mm sensitive radicles (Table II,
profile 9). There were 32 spots that were associated with desiccation sensitivity, being more
abundant in the 2.8 mm radicles: they represented 8% of the total amount spots. Another
interesting group of spots are those found in profile 4, whose abundance increased
significantly upon the PEG treatment (44 spots, 11.2%).
Discrimination Between the Desiccation-Tolerant Proteome and the Osmotically
Induced Proteome
A total of 23 spots showed a higher abundance in both desiccation-tolerant stages compared
to the sensitive stage (profile 9, Table II). These spots were further analyzed using two
additional stages: 5 mm long, desiccation-sensitive emerged radicles before and after a PEG
treatment (Table I). As a result, the spots could be separated in two sub-groups: A) those that
are only induced in the 2.8 mm long radicles after PEG treatment and are thus linked
specifically to DT and B) those that are also induced by the PEG incubation in 5-mm long
radicles that remain desiccation-sensitive. Out of the 23 spots, 11 were found to be associated
specifically with the induction of DT (subgroup A) and 7 were induced both in 2.8 and 5-mm
long PEG-treated radicles (subgroup B), albeit not always to similar levels in both tissues.
Among these 7 spots, 5 exhibited a significant higher intensity in 2.8 mm PEG-treated
radicles than in the 5 mm ones. They were therefore also linked to DT. The remaining 5 spots
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
could not be categorized in either of these two groups and are not further considered in this
study.
It is noteworthy that, although the PEG incubation of the 5 mm long radicles did not lead
to the re-establishment of DT, this treatment did result in an improvement of the tolerance to
drying. This is demonstrated by the assessment of the water content to which 50 % of the
population of germinated seeds can be dried and rehydrated without loss of viability of their
radicle (threshold water content, Fig. 2 and Table I). Germinated seeds with an emerged
radicle of 2.8 mm long were able to survive a desiccation treatment down to 1 g H2O/g DW
(g/g) but died at lower water content. Fifty % of survival was obtained at 0.3 g/g (Table I).
After the PEG treatment, 2.8 mm long emerged radicles were able to survive nearly complete
removal of water and thus considered desiccation-tolerant (Fig. 2). In contrast, 5 mm long
radicles were very sensitive to drying. Fifty % of death was obtained when the radicles were
dried to 3.6 g/g. However, after a 2 d incubation in the osmoticum, they had become more
tolerant to desiccation since the threshold water content decreased to 0.8 g/g (Table I).
Whitsitt et al. (1997) observed a similar effect for soybean seedlings: an incipient water
deficit decreased the sensitivity of seedlings to further dehydration. The division of profile 9
into the two subgroups A and B showed that certain spots could only be induced in those
tissues that become desiccation-tolerant, whereas others could also be re-induced by the PEG
incubation in 5 mm long radicles that remained desiccation-sensitive (data not shown).
Identification of Heat Stable Proteins Associated with Desiccation Tolerance
The 16 spots belonging to profile 9A and 9B and linked with DT were analyzed using matrix-
assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) and
liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Out of these 16 spots, 11
were identified as 6 different LEA proteins, some of them being present as different isoforms
(Table III). Another polypeptide was identified as a homologue of a pea legumin precursor
(Table III). Since the Mw of this spot was much lower than expected, we suspected that the
onset of the digestion of storage proteins, which is known to occur during radicle growth
(Capron et al., 2000; Gallardo et al., 2001), yielded small, hydrophilic peptides. This legumin
fragment represented less than 0.05 % of the HS proteome. It was not therefore taken into
account for the remainder of this study. Finally, four polypeptides were not identified.
To find out to which groups the identified LEA proteins linked to DT belong to, a
phylogenetic tree was constructed with LEA proteins of M. truncatula after a search in the
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
TIGR (http://www.tigr.org/tdb/mtgi) and NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) databases
using a set of keywords and the PFAM domains characteristic of plant LEA proteins
(http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Pfam/index.shtml). Twenty-five genes were obtained and
a phylogenetic tree with the protein sequences was generated using ClustalX (Thompson et
al., 1997) and TreeView (Page, 1996). In light of conflicting classifications of LEA proteins
(see Wise, 2003), those by Cuming (1999) and Dure (1993) as well as the PFam domains
(Bateman et al., 2004) are indicated in the tree (Fig. 3). The 6 LEA proteins identified in this
study in relation to DT belonged to 4 different groups according to Cuming’s classification
One DT-linked spot (Table III, Fig. 1 spot 37) was identified as a homologue of Em6 of A.
thaliana, and was the only representative of group 1 (G1). Figure 3 suggests that Cuming’s
group 5 is divided in two clusters of closely related genes (i.e. D34, PF04927 and D95,
PF03168) as previously suggested by Dure (1993). In the literature, the D34 family has been
classified successively in group 6 then 5 (Wise, 2003). In this work, one of its member was
detected in relation to DT and named PM25 due to the high similarity with GmPM25 from G.
max (Table III, Fig. 1 spot 21). One isoform of DHN3 (spot 11) was linked to DT. According
to Fig. 3, it is a member group 2 (G2) LEA proteins, also known as dehydrins (D11,
PF00257). Figure 3 shows that LEA proteins from Cuming’s group 3 (G3, D7, PF029877) do
not appear to form an homogeneous clade. Three members of this group were found to be
correlated to DT. Among them were two closely related proteins, homologues of PM18 and
MP2 of G. max (Table III, Fig. 1 spot 16 and 19) and one unrelated protein, identified as a
homologue of SBP65 of P. sativum, a biotinylated protein (Table III, spots 2-6).
Analysis of the changes in relative volume of Em6 and PM25 (Fig. 4B and D)
demonstrated that the PEG treatment significantly re-induced the expression of both proteins
in the 2.8 mm long emerged radicles. Nonetheless, the re-establishment of DT did not lead to
a similar re-induction of the protein abundance as was the case in the non-germinated,
desiccation-tolerant seeds. The three DT-linked LEA proteins that belong to group 3 (MP2,
PM18 and SBP65) were present as several isoforms, mainly differing in pI (Fig 4 and 5).
Based on the statistical analysis of their normalized intensities, they were categorized in
different profiles. MP2 was present in two forms (Fig. 4 E, F); the most abundant one was
linked to DT (spot 19) whereas a very faint spot (20) was classified in profile 4 (i.e. induced
by the PEG treatment only in 2.8 mm long PEG-treated radicles; data not shown,
supplementary table I). Three spots corresponding to PM18 (spot 15, 16 and 17), showed a
different expression profile (Fig. 5A). Spot 16 (Fig. 5A, B) was found to be linked to DT
whereas the most acidic polypeptide (15) increased upon osmotic treatment regardless of
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
whether full DT is induced or not (profile 9B, Fig. 5B). The most basic spot (18) did not vary
significantly between NG and 2.8 mm radicles, but decreased in the 5-mm long protruded
ones. Furthermore, it did not respond to the PEG treatment (Fig. 5B). A similar pattern was
observed for spot 17. It was tentatively identified as a fourth isoform of PM18 because the
experimental trypsin digestion before the MALDI-TOF analysis produced 4 digested
peptides, the masses of which matched some obtained by the theoretical digestion of the
translated Medicago TC similar to PM18. The third member of group 3, SBP65, existed in 6
isoforms with different pIs (spots 1 to 5, Fig 5C, D) and Mw (spot 6, Fig. 1). Again, the
different isoforms were classified in two profiles: 9A, re-induced only in 2.8 mm long PEG-
treated radicles and 9B, also re-induced in 5 mm long PEG-treated radicles (Fig 5 D).
Nonetheless, for all isoforms, the abundance was significantly higher in those tissues that
were desiccation-tolerant than in those that remained sensitive.
Another group of proteins that show an interesting profile are those being induced upon
osmotic stress in protruded radicles of both stages, belonging to profile 4 (Table II). The two
dehydrins (G2) that were identified in this profile were DHN3 and BudCar5, both being
present in several isoforms (Fig. 6). DHN3 was present in 3 isoforms (spots 11-13; Fig 6 A,
B). The abundance of the two most basic forms (spots 12 and 13) increased as a response to
the PEG treatment only in the 2.8 mm long radicles. In contrast, the two most acidic forms
(10 and 11) responded to the osmotic treatment by increasing ca. 2-fold both in 2.8 and 5 mm
radicles. Spot 11 was classified in profile 9B (Table II) as mentioned earlier. The amount of
all Budcar5 isoforms (spots 31-33) increased sharply upon the PEG-incubation (Fig. 6C, D).
Dehydrins are known to be expressed under different types of stress and in different tissues,
thus their induction upon PEG-incubation was expected.
To investigate whether the DT-linked 6 LEA proteins were seed specific or expressed in
different tissues and/or under different stress conditions, their gene expression was analyzed
in silico. Also added to this analysis were two additional LEA proteins: CapLea1
(TC100264), a group 3 LEA protein representing the largest amount of the heat stable fraction
but whose levels remained constant in the radicles of different stages (spot 34, Fig. 1), and
BudCar5. In silico gene expression was expressed as the number of expressed sequence tags
(ESTs) corresponding to the LEA proteins based on the total number of ESTs present in the
particular cDNA library. Thirty-four libraries representing different organs submitted or not to
drought, nutrient and biotic stresses, developing seeds at different stages and germinating
seeds were selected and pooled into 9 groups (Fig. 7, supplementary table II). Except for
DHN3, the remaining 5 LEA proteins that were identified in relation to DT appeared to be
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
seed specific (Fig. 7). DHN3 was expressed in several libraries, mainly in drought-stressed
leaves. The expression of BudCar5 was detected in all the libraries studied. The in silico
expression analysis of the all LEA proteins shown in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3) revealed
that all LEA genes from group 1 to 4 that were specifically expressed in seeds (supplementary
table II) were found to be linked to DT in this study. Only three other members of group 5 and
Lea5 (no classification) that were present in the seed libraries were not detected here.
Furthermore, only 2 of the 23 known LEA genes (DIP, a dehydrin and CapLea1B, member of
G3) were not present in at least one of the seed libraries (supplementary table II).
Whether the digestion of storage proteins yielded hydrophilic peptides during germination
and PEG incubation was further assessed by excising and identifying spots of low mass from
gels of radicles of NG seeds and 2.8 mm long emerged radicles of germinated seeds. Spots 35
and 40 (Fig. 1, Mw around 16 kDa) were also identified as homologues to the pea legumin
precursor (theoretical Mw 65 kDa, TC85216). Four spots (22, 23, 24, 25; Mw around 31kDa,
Fig. 1) were identified as homologues of the pea convicilin (TC100299) having a theoretical
Mw of 78.3 kDa. These fragments of storage proteins belonged to profile 2, 3 and 5 (Table II)
and were not very abundant. Likewise, the heat stable proteome included proteins other than
LEA proteins (for example homologues of a Vicia faba transcription factor (TC94137), an
ankyrin repeat protein 2 from Vitis aestivalis (TC100495) and a glycine-rich protein 2 of
Nicotiana sylvestris (TC98399); see supplementary table I).
Changes in MtPM25 and MtEm6 in Relation to Desiccation Tolerance during Seed
Maturation and Germination
The expression profiles of two of the six LEA proteins that were linked to DT were further
characterized to confirm the data obtained from the 2D proteomic analysis. The analysis was
extended to cotyledons during germination and embryos during seed development to ascertain
the abundance of these LEA proteins with DT. MtPM25 and MtEm6 were chosen because
they were represented by a single spot in the gels, thereby alleviating any complication with
the interpretation of western blots that were performed in one dimension. Full length cDNAs
corresponding to the MtPM25 (DQ206870) and MtEm6 (DQ206712) were obtained by
RACE. Sequences corresponding to a N-terminal poly-HIS tag and cleavage site for
enterokinase were added to the full length encoding sequence and the recombinant proteins
were expressed in E. coli. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies were raised against the purified
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
recombinant MtPM25 and MtEm6. For each antibody, a signal at the expected molecular size
was detected both with protein extracts from radicles and the recombinant protein. The signals
were absent when the pre-immune serums were used (data not shown). During seed
imbibition, contents of both MtPM25 and MtEm6 in the radicles remained high for up to 15 h
(Fig. 8A, E). In 20 h imbibed radicles (ca 2.8 mm in length), MtPM25 was barely detectable,
whereas MtEm6 had already disappeared. In accordance with the proteomic analysis, the
osmotic treatment was found to re-induce the expression of both proteins in 2.8 mm long
emerged radicles, albeit to lower levels than those found in NG radicles (Fig. 8C, G). In 5 mm
long radicles, the PEG treatment only resulted in the appearance of a very faint signal. The
relationship between DT and the presence of both proteins was also confirmed for the
cotyledons during germination (Fig. 8B, F). In contrast to radicles, DT in cotyledons was
maintained for up to 24 h of imbibition and lost at 48 h. In parallel, MtEm6 and MtPM25
amounts decreased to barely detectable levels and disappeared. During seed development,
tolerance to rapid enforced drying was acquired between 14 and 22 days after pollination
(DAP, Fig. 8). Contents of MtPM25 increased at 14 DAP in parallel with the acquisition of
DT (Fig. 8D) whereas those of MtEm6 started to accumulate later at 18 DAP.
Secondary Structure Analysis of MtPM25 and MtEm6 Proteins
It has been established that LEA proteins of group 3 and 4 undergo an unordered to ordered
structure transition during the loss of water (Wolkers et al., 2001; Goyal et al., 2003; Shih et
al., 2004). Considering their divergence in the Kyte and Doolittle hydrophilicity profile
(http://ca.expasy.org/tools/protscale.html), possible differences in secondary structure of the
recombinant form of MtPM25 and MtEm6 were investigated. Whether changes in protein
conformation were induced upon drying was also assessed. FT-IR spectra of recombinant
proteins in the hydrated and dried state were recorded after removal of the His6x tag (Fig. 9).
To avoid interference of the H-O-H scissoring vibration of water around 1646 cm-1 with the
amide-I band between 1700 and 1600 cm-1, D2O instead of H2O was used for the proteins in
solution. Wolkers et al. (1998) demonstrated that intermolecular ß-sheet formation can
effectively be prevented by fast drying, probably because the time required for such non-
intramolecular rearrangements is too short. For this reason, we studied the recombinant
proteins after fast and slow drying in air of ca. 3 and 67% RH, respectively.
Superficial inspection of the IR-spectrum in the Amide I region (Fig. 9) revealed that in
D2O the proteins displayed a broadened band at a wavenumber position (1460 cm-1) that was
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
lower than in the case of the fast-dried proteins (1550 cm-1). This behavior in D2O may be
partly due to 2H exchange with protons in the protein backbone, which is particularly likely in
unordered structures (Raussens et al., 1997). On the other hand, the dominating band at ca.
1658 cm-1 in the fast-dried proteins may be the result of an increased α-helical content. In the
fast-dried MtPM25, there is evidence of a shoulder at ca. 1630 cm-1, which is less prominent
in the fast-dried MtEm6. This is suggestive of a larger proportion of intermolecular ß-sheet in
MtPM25 than in MtEm6 after fast drying. Finally, slow drying led to an increase in this
structure for MtPM25, which is not observed for MtEm6. An additional slow drying
experiment was performed at 85% RH over a KCl saturated solution. In this case, the
conformation remains similar to that after fast drying, indicating that the increase in β-sheet
structure occurs below 85% RH.
More detailed information on secondary structures in these proteins was obtained by a
curve fitting procedure on the original amide-I band according to Wolkers et al. (2001). An
example of the curve-fitting procedure is given in Fig. 10 with fast-dried MtEm6 protein.
Peaks representing different secondary structures were selected on account of the second
derivative spectrum (Fig. 10, A). Co-addition of all the dashed peaks that were
mathematically produced should result in a fit (crosses) that resembles the original absorption
spectrum (Fig. 10, B). Individual contributions by the various protein secondary structures
can thus be estimated. Table IV shows the curve-fitting results of the amide-I region of both
proteins in D2O and after fast or slow drying. In solution both proteins had between 30 and
40% α-helical structure, with MtPM25 having more extended ß-sheet than MtEm6. If both
random and turn structures were to be combined and considered as “unordered structures”,
even though a certain degree of order might exist for some of them, then MtEm6 would have
37% α-helix, 10% ß-sheet and 53% unordered structures, whereas MtPM25 would consist of
33% α-helix, 18% ß-sheet and 49% unordered structures (Table IV). These figures concur
fairly well with PELE predictions (SDSC Biology workbench: workbench.sdsc.edu). In water
solution, MtEm6 is predicted to form 33% α-helix, 3% ß-sheet and 64% unordered structures
whereas 38% α-helix, 14% ß-sheet and 48% unordered structures are expected for MtPM25.
Support for the largely unordered nature of both Lea proteins in water also comes from the
behavior of the amide-II band around 1540 cm-1 in D2O (Fig. 9). This band was considerably
smaller than that upon fast drying and partly downshifted to 1450 cm-1. The effect of D2O was
stronger for MtPM25 than for MtEm6. Apparently, the amide protons (N-H) were, to a
considerable extent, open for 2H-exchange from D2O, which is interpreted to mean that both
proteins have a fairly unordered structure in water (Haris et al., 1989).
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
Table IV further shows that either fast or slow drying led to a considerable increase in α-
helical structure in both proteins at the expense of the unordered structures. This
intramolecular rearrangement apparently was independent of the rate of drying. In contrast to
MtEm6, MtPM25 tended to form extended ß-sheets upon slow drying, which appeared to be
reversible upon rehydration. When indicated as percentages of α-helix, ß-sheet and unordered
structures, MtEm6 consisted of 57, 12, 31% and 60, 8, 32%, after fast and slow drying,
respectively. Data for MtPM25 were 54, 17, 29% and 56, 25, 19%, respectively.
DISCUSSION
To identify proteins involved in DT, a proteomic screening of the HS fraction of soluble
proteins from imbibed radicles of M. truncatula was combined with a physiological system
that enables the re-establishment of DT in 2.8 mm long emerged radicles by an osmotic
treatment. To separate the proteins induced by the osmoticum from those involved in DT, the
comparison was extended to emerged radicles of 5 mm long, for which DT could no longer be
re-induced by the same osmotic treatment. In total, 15 polypeptides were found, whose
abundance was linked to DT. Among them 11 were identified, which represented 6 LEA
proteins from different groups: MtEm6 (group 1), one isoform of DHN3 (dehydrins),
MtPM25 (group 5) and three members of group 3: MP2, the basic isoform of PM18 and all
the isoforms of SBP65 (Table III). Our in silico analysis revealed that the expression of all the
DT-linked LEA genes was apparently seed specific, except for one isoform of DHN3.
The abundance of all these proteins was associated with DT (Figs. 4, 5 and 8).
Nonetheless, the causal relationship between the 6 LEA proteins and DT remains difficult to
assess. It is possible to obtain dry and viable seeds from Arabidopsis and maize mutants with
very low or undetectable levels of Em transcripts (Williams and Tsang 1991; Carles et al.,
2002). It is not known whether in these mutants, other (LEA) proteins could compensate for
the absence of Em proteins. In addition LEA proteins might act synergistically with other
protective compounds in the dry state. For instance, the combination of LEA proteins and
non-reducing sugars offers better protection against protein aggregation after drying than each
component alone (Goyal et al., 2005). In vivo, cytoplasmic glasses are thought to be
composed of sugars and other compounds (reviewed in Buitink and Leprince, 2004). In vitro,
a mixture of LEA proteins and sugars forms a glass upon drying that exhibits physico-
chemical properties resembling those of cytoplasmic glasses, whereas a glass made of sugars
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
alone has different properties (Wolkers et al., 2001; Buitink and Leprince, 2004; Shih et al.,
2004).
This study also identified several LEA proteins that are linked to drought tolerance rather
than DT, such as several isoforms of DHN3 (spots 12 and 13) as well as isoforms of BudCar5
(Fig. 6). Indeed, the isoforms of these dehydrins were induced not only in the 2.8 mm long
radicles after PEG incubation, but also in the 5 mm long PEG-treated radicles. However,
although the treatment on the 5mm long radicles did not re-establish DT, it did lead
nevertheless to an increased tolerance to drying, evident from the reduction in the threshold
water content from 3.6 g/g to 0.8 g/g. In silico analysis shows that both dehydrin genes are
expressed in drought-stressed plants as well (Fig. 7). This observation concurs with those of
Black et al (1999) who showed that the induction of dehydrins in maturating wheat embryos
is not regulated by the same factors that induce DT. The presence of dehydrins in recalcitrant
seeds of temperate climate (Kermode, 1997), the absence of correlation between their
amounts and seed longevity (Wechsberg et al., 1994) together with the observation that
dehydrins protect enzyme activities only at water potentials above -3 MPa (Reyes et al., 2005)
all point to a protective function at high hydration levels. Thus, dehydrins might protect at
intermediate hydration levels (>0.8 g/g), whereas the DT-linked LEA proteins might play a
role below the hydration level corresponding to the threshold water content of 2.8 mm long
radicles (i.e. 0.3 g/g). In this respect, transcript levels of an homologues of MtEm6 were
correlated with seed longevity of Brassica napus (Soeda et al., 2005) and the wheat
homologue of MtEm6 was found to protect citrate synthase from aggregation due to
desiccation upon multiple freeze-drying cycles, supporting the hypothesis that Em6 can
protect macromolecules in the dry state (Goyal et al., 2005). Conversely, over-expression of
the wheat Em in yeast cells (Swire-Clark and Marcotte, 1999) and also of the Arabidopsis
homologue of MtPM25 in germinating seeds (Borrell et al., 2002) led to improved growth
under high NaCl, KCl, LiCl and sorbitol conditions. Recently, a similar observation was made
for E. coli over-expressing the PM2 (Liu and Zheng, 2002). The cellular water potential
resulting from incubation in these osmotic solutions (osmotic potential ranging from –2 to –6
MPa and equivalent to 96-98% RH) is much higher than those experienced by the dry seeds
(in this study: 42% RH equivalent to –180 MPa, Walters et al., 2002). These results argue for
a protective role of Em6, PM25 and MP2 during hyperosmotic conditions rather than at low
water contents. In the light of these observations, one could envisage that the DT-linked Em6,
MP2, MtPM25 and PM18 could exert more than one function upon water loss as
hypothesized for non reducing sugars, which act as osmolytes during hyperosmotic stress and
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
stabilizers of macromolecules in the dry state (Prestrelski et al., 1993; Allison et al., 1999;
Hoekstra et al., 2001). For example, at high moisture contents, DT-linked LEA proteins may
act as compatible solutes that preferentially exclude chaotropic agents (such as salts) from the
surface of macromolecules as suggested by the beneficial effects described above (Swire-
Clark and Marcotte, 1999; Borrell et al.; 2002; Liu and Zheng, 2002; Reyes et al., 2005).
Likewise, when the hydration shell is removed (i.e. water content less than 0.3 g/g), they
might exert their protective effects in the dry state, as was found for wheat Em, by replacing
water molecules by hydrogen bonding and/or forming a glass which stabilizes the system in
the dried state (Hoekstra et al., 2001; Wolkers et al., 2001; Buitink and Leprince, 2004).
Group 5 LEA proteins, to which MtPM25 belongs, have been reported to be a peculiar
group, with low hydrophilicity and no absence of heat stability (Cuming, 1999; Ramanjulu
and Bartels, 2002). Indeed, MtPM25 was the least hydrophilic from the 6 LEA proteins
identified in this study. However, MtPM25 was heat stable and the contention that group 5
proteins are not heat stable is questionable. To determine the structure of a member of group 5
LEA protein, FTIR analysis on MtPM25 was carried out and compared to that on Em6. The
data on the secondary structure of MtEm6 and MtPM25 in solution complement those
obtained for members of groups 3 and 4 using FT-IR spectroscopy as well as for dehydrins
and a member of the D95 family with other spectroscopy techniques. In the hydrated state,
LEA proteins exhibit a wide degree of disorder, ranging from unordered [group 1, Soulages et
al., 2002; group 3 LEA proteins from Typha latifolia pollen (Wolkers et al., 2001) and
nematodes (Goyal et al., 2003); dehydrins (Soulages et al., 2003)], to 60-70% unordered
[GmPM16, a soybean group 4 LEA protein (Shih et al., 2004) and Em proteins (Table IV,
McCubbin 1985)] and finally down to 50% unordered [MtPM25 (Table IV) and an
Arabidopis Lea14, a member of the D 95 family (PF03168; Singh et al., 2005)]. Likewise, the
nature and contents of ordered structures in solution varies greatly. For example, β−sheet
amounts range from 10% for MtEm6 to 40% for the Arabidopsis Lea14. Considering that the
ectopic expression of members of group 1 to 5 always improves the tolerance against salt or
water stress in bacteria, yeast and plants, albeit to various degrees, it is tempting to speculate
that the unordered domains of LEA proteins is responsible for alleviating the osmotic stress
endured by the tissues. It is noteworthy that the presence of β−sheets appears to be a common
feature of LEA proteins and apparently does not affect the heat solubility of the protein.
Considering that MtEm6 and MtPM25 are hypothesized to play a role in the dry state,
their conformation was also determined after drying. The removal of the water induced a
transition from a fairly disordered conformation to the formation of a considerable amount of
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
ordered structures (Table IV). Our study suggests that this behavior is yet another feature that
now appears to be common to all LEA proteins. Indeed, originally observed for the group 3
and 4 LEA proteins mentioned above, this study shows that it is also the case for members of
group 1 and 5. Both proteins show an increase in their α-helical and β-sheet contents (Table
IV). According to Wolkers et al. (1998), the β-sheet formation results from the replacement of
hydrogen bonding of water by intermolecular hydrogen bonds between peptide backbones.
When induced by drying, β-sheets were fully reversible and could be interconverted by
rehydration, in agreement with previous observations on the group 3 LEA protein from pollen
(Wolkers et al., 2001) and the group 4 GmPM16 of soybean (Shih et al., 2004). The PELE
program did predict the overall contributions of secondary structures of MtEm6 and MtPM25
in the hydrated state, but did not in the dry state. Also for the group 4 GmPM16, the structure
predictions can not be fulfilled in the dried state (Shih et al., 2004). This contrasts with the
findings of Goyal et al (2003) on a group 3 LEA from nematodes. Thus, caution must be
taken in extrapolating computer predictions to the dried state to understand the structure-
function relationship of LEA proteins at low water contents.
So at which hydration level do these proteins gain structure? Slow drying over saturated
salt solutions indicated that the proteins had to be dried below an equilibrium RH of 85% in
order to observe a change in the secondary structure (β-sheet formation). The corresponding
hydration level is around 0.2-0.3 g/g, or to the onset of the removal of the hydration shell
(Hoekstra et al., 2001; Walters et al., 2002). This is a significant finding considering the
hypothesis that DT-linked LEA proteins could play different protective functions depending
on the hydration level. Indeed, the gain of structure at low water contents occurs at a
hydration level that is below that experienced during hyperosmotic stress, but before the
protein is immobilized in the cytoplasmic glassy state. Furthermore, it was observed that the
rate of water loss influences the conformation adopted by MtEm6 and MtPM25 in the dry
state, which is in agreement with the data of Wolkers et al. (2001) on the group 3 LEA protein
from pollen. The presence of solutes such as sucrose also influences the change in
conformation during drying (Wolkers et al., 1998; 2001). We do not know whether this is also
the case for MtPM25 and MtEm6. However, in light of these observations, it is important to
test whether and how the nature and rate of drying influences the protective activity of LEA
proteins in vitro.
Both group 2 (DHN3 and BudCar5) and group 3 LEA proteins (MP2, PM18 and SBP65)
were detected as several isoforms. This observation extends previous experimental evidence
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
showing that dehydrins are submitted to post-translational modifications such as
phosphorlylation during seed development and germination (Campalans et al., 2000; Riera et
al., 2004). Phosphorylation of dehydrins has a functional importance during water and cold
stress (Riera et al., 2004; Alsheikh et al., 2005). Both PM18 and DHN3 have distinct isoforms
that are related to DT, whereas others are clearly not (Figs. 5 and 6). This raises the question
as to whether the regulation of post-translational modifications might be also important for
DT.
SBP65 exhibits a peculiar post-transcriptional modification. This DT-linked group 3 LEA
protein is known to be biotinylated in seeds of a wide range of species (Dehaye et al., 1997;
Capron et al., 2000). This protein has been shown to accumulate during the later stages of
seed development and to be degraded during germination (Dehaye et al., 1997; Capron et al.,
2000). It has been suggested that SBP65 constitutes a storage form of biotin that can be
released during germination and postgerminative growth (Dehaye et al., 1997). Whether its
role in DT is simply to store biotin or whether it has an additional, structural function in the
protection against drying remains to be ascertained.
Using a computational analysis, it has been argued that LEA proteins are members of a
larger family of stress proteins called “hydrophilins” that could be used as predictors of the
responsiveness to osmotic adaptation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Garray-Arroyo et al.,
2000). Hydrophilins are defined as proteins having a Gly content > 6% and a hydrophylicity
index > 1. The analysis of the heat stable proteome of M truncatula radicles does not support
this analysis on seeds. On the one hand, MtPM25 and SPB65, two polypeptides linked to DT
do not satisfy the hydrophilicity and Gly content criterium, respectively. On the other hand,
we identified several hydrophilic proteins, such as several fragments of legumin and vicilin
that matched those criteria and yet, they were not induced by the osmotic treatment.
Therefore, in seeds, the term "hydrophilins" can not adequately describe the LEA protein
family or water stress proteins.
Altogether, the data reported in this study suggest that the LEA proteins expressed in
seeds can be divided in two groups, those that are induced only in tissues that are desiccation-
tolerant, and those that are also induced in osmotically shocked radicles that remain
desiccation-sensitive but do increase their tolerance to drying. The first group contains LEA
proteins that seem to be seed specific, based on electronic northerns, whereas the second
group is represented by proteins that are also expressed in vegetative tissues. Possibly, the
proteins that are linked to DT might protect both at high hydration levels and at very low
water contents (<0.3 g/g). Further research should be focused on elucidating whether these
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
proteins play a role at water contents where the proteins have gained further order in their
secondary structures and whether their functions are regulated by post-translational
modifications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant Material and Treatments
Seeds of M. truncatula Gaertn. (cv Paraggio, Seedco Australia Co-Operative Ltd, Hilton,
Australia) were allowed to imbibe on filter paper in distilled water at 20°C in the dark for up
to 3 d. For the proteomic analysis, desiccation-tolerant stages were established as described in
Buitink et al. (2003). They correspond to 16h-imbibed seeds prior to radicle emergence and
seeds exhibiting a protruded radicle length of 2.8 mm (ca. 20-h imbibed) that were incubated
in a PEG 8000 solution having a water potential of -1.7 MPa for 2 d at 10°C. Desiccation-
sensitive stages corresponded to germinated seeds exhibiting a protruded radicle of 2.8 mm as
well as protruded radicles of 5 mm before and after the PEG treatment. PEG-treated seeds
were briefly rinsed in distilled water before further analysis. To determine the threshold water
content, control and PEG-treated seeds with a protruded radicle of 2.8 and 5 mm were dried
for up to 2 d at 20°C in circulating air at 42% RH. At different intervals during drying,
triplicates of 10 radicles were excised to determine their moisture content and the remainder
of the batch was allowed to imbibe as described above. Seeds that exhibiting a growing
radicle during rehydration were considered desiccation-tolerant. When planted, these seeds
developed normal seedlings similar to untreated seeds.
Plants were grown in a sterile mix of vermiculite and soil in a growth chamber at
24°C/21°C, 16 h photoperiod at 350 µM m-2 s-2. Flowers were tagged and developing seeds
were harvested as described in Gallardo et al. (2003). DT was determined by drying and
rehydrating isolated seeds as described above. Seeds that were able to germinate under the
above conditions were considered as desiccation-tolerant. Water content was determined
according to Buitink et al. (2003). For protein extraction, excised radicles and cotyledons of
germinating seeds and isolated embryos from developing seeds were immediately frozen in
liquid N2 and stored at –80°C before use.
Protein Extraction
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
Soluble proteins were extracted from 50 (western blots) and 100-300 (2-DE) radicles at 4°C
in 400 and 950 µL of buffer, respectively [(500 mM HEPES pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA and 14%
(v/v) of the protease inhibitor cocktail complete Mini (Roche Diagnostics Molecular
Biochemicals, Meylan, France)], 43 U of Dnase I and 5.3 U of Rnase A. After two
consecutive centrifugations at 13,000 g at 4°C, the resulting supernatant was heated for 10
min at 95°C, cooled for 15 min on ice and centrifuged at 13,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. The
resulting supernatant corresponded to the HS fraction. Protein concentrations were assayed
according to Bradford (1976). For the 2D electrophoresis, the HS proteins were precipitated
with 20% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid on ice then centrifuged at 13,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The
pellet was washed with 400 µl of cold acetone, air dried and resuspended in 500 µL of
rehydration buffer (6 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% (w/v) CHAPS, 20 mM dithiothreitol (DTT),
1% (v/v) biolytes from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA).
2D Electrophoresis
Twenty-four cm immobilized pH gradient (non linear from 3 to 10) strips (Bio-Rad)
containing 500 µg of heat stable proteins were rehydrated at 50 V for 12 h at 20°C.
Isoelectrofocusing ran at 20°C at 250 V for 5 h then at 8 kV until 60 kVh in a Bio-Rad
Protean IEF Cell. Thereafter, a two step equilibration was carried out by incubating each strip
at room temperature in 8 mL of solution: first step, 15 min in a buffer containing 8 M urea,
375 mM Tris pH 8.8, 20% (v/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) SDS, 130 mM DTT; second step, 30 min
in the same buffer with 250 mM iodoacetamide instead of DTT. Size separation of proteins
was performed on vertical polyacrylamide gels (12% (w/v) acrylamide) in a Ettan Daltsix
Electrophoresis system (Amersham Biosciences, Orsay, France) according to Gallardo et al.
(2001) using a modified running buffer containing 15.6 mM Tris (pH 8.3), 120 mM Gly,
0.1% (w/v) SDS. The experiments were set up in randomized block design where 6 gels
corresponding to independent protein extractions from various desiccation-tolerant and -
sensitive stages were run in parallel. Four to 8 gels per stage were accumulated independently
until the coefficient of variance of the normalized intensity of 50 representative spots that
were present in all stages was below 25% (Asirvatham et al., 2002).
Gel Staining, Image and Statistical Analysis
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
Gels were stained with 0.08% (w/v) Brillant Blue G-Colloidal for 24 h, destained briefly in
5% (v/v) acetic acid and 25% (v/v) methanol then in 25% (v/v) methanol for 8 h. Stained gels
were scanned at 95.3*95.3 resolution with an optical density range of 0.05 to 3.13 using a GS
800 scanner (Bio-Rad). Digitalized gels were analysed using the PD-Quest 7.1 software (Bio-
Rad). Images were filtered (mode pepper outlier 7*7). To identify differentially expressed
protein spots, the gels corresponding to the NG, 2.8 mm and 2.8 mm+PEG stages were first
compared using a representative gel of the NG stage as the reference gel. After optimization
of the parameters for background subtraction and spot detection, the spots that were not
present in at least 50% of the gels and those exhibiting a quality below the set value of 20%
(max. value being 100%) were discarded. After spot matching, spot intensities were
normalized using the "total quantity in valid spot" method: the quantity of each spot in a gel is
divided by the total quantity of all the spots in the reference gel. The statistical method of
Schiltz et al. (2004) was used to compare the protein abundance among the stages. A nested
ANOVA (P< 0.05) was performed using the Statgraphics software (StatPoint Inc, Herndon,
VA): the normalized spot quantities and the stage were respectively the variable and the factor
whereas the extraction and the 2D electrophoresis were nested in the factor. The Bartlett test
(P<0.05) was used to confirm the applicability of the ANOVA. A multiple comparison of the
means using the Student-Newman-Keuls test (P<0.05) was then performed on the normalized
quantities that were found to be significantly different among the stages. To discriminate
proteins expressed during the PEG-induced DT from those expressed solely as the result of
the PEG treatment, digitalized 2DE gels both from the 5mm and 5mm+PEG stages were
included in the image analysis. The spots of interest that were revealed by the statistical
analysis described above were matched in the reference gel when they were detected in the
gels from the 5 mm and/or 5mm+PEG stages. Because a minority of spots were considered,
the spot quantity was normalized throughout the five stages using the "total density in gel
image" method: the spot quantity is divided by the total intensity value of the gel. Difference
in protein abundance was then submitted to statistical analysis as above. Experimental
molecular masses and pI were determined from digitalized gels using 2-D marker proteins
(Bio-Rad) and the calibration method of the PDQuest software (BioRad).
Mass Spectrometry and Protein Identification
Spots of interest were excised from the 2DE gels and subjected to in-gel tryptic digestion as
described in (Wilm et al., 1996). Briefly, gel slices were washed with 100 µL of 25 mM
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
20
NH4HCO3, followed by dehydration with 100 µL of 50% (v/v) acetonitrile in 25 mM
NH4HCO3. Proteins were reduced and alkylated by incubation for 1h at 57°C in the presence
of 10 mM DTT followed by 45 min at room temperature after adding 55 mM iodoacetamide.
Gel slices were washed with NH4HCO3 and dehydrated as described before. Gel slices were
vacuum dried and rehydrated with 10 µL of 12.5 ng µL-1 trypsin in 25 mM NH4HCO3
(Sequencing grade, Promega, Madison, WI). After an overnight incubation at 37°C, the
supernatant was collected and the tryptic fragments were measured by MALDI-TOF and/or
LC-MS/MS. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry was performed on a M@LDI LR instrument
equipped with a conventional laser at 337 nm (Micromass-Waters, Manchester, UK). One µL
of the sample was mixed with 1 µL of the matrix preparation (2.5 g/L α-cyano-4-
hydroxycinnamic, 2.5 g/L 2,5-dihydroxy benzoïc acid, 70% (v/v) acetonitrile, 0.1% w/v
trifluoroacetic acid) and deposited onto the MALDI sample probe. LC-MS/MS analysis was
performed using a nanoscale HPLC (Famos-Switchos-Ultimate system, LC Packings, Dionex,
The Netherlands) coupled to a hybrid quadrupole orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight mass
spectrometer (Q-TOF Global, Micromass-Waters, UK). Chromatographic separations were
conducted on a reverse-phase capillary column (Pepmap C18, LC Packings) at a flow rate of
200 nL/min using a gradient from 2 to 50% of 0.08% (w/v) formic acid in acetonitrile. Mass
data were recorded for 1 sec on the mass range 400-1500 m/z using the Masslynx software
(Micromass-Waters), after which the two most intense ions were selected and fragmented in
the collision cell. The collision energy profiles were optimised for various mass ranges and
charge states of precursor ions. Mass data obtained by MALDI-TOF or LC-MS/MS were
analysed with the Protein Lynx Global Server software (Micromass-Waters). Protein
identification was performed by comparing the data with the UniProt sequence databank or
with TIGR Medicago EST databank (date of release: January 26, 2005).
Expression and purification of recombinant MtPM25 and MtEm6 proteins
Expression vectors for the overexpression of MtPM25 and MtEm6 proteins in E. coli were
constructed using the Gateway technology (Invitrogen). Full length cDNA was amplified by
PCR using a forward primer with an attB1 sequence (MtPM25_F:
GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTAGATTACAAGGATGATGATGATAA
GATGAGTCAAGAACAACCAAG and MtEm6_F:
GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTCGATGGGGCATCATCATCATC)
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
21
followed by an additional sequence encoding the FLAG epitope and digestion site for
enterokinase (DYKDDDK) just prior to the start codon and a reverse primer with an AttB2
sequence flanking the stop codon (MtPM25_R:
GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCTTACTTAACATTTTCATTGAGCCTA
GCAGCCGCA and MtEm6_R:
GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTTCACTTGTTCTGGCTCCTAC). PCRs
and in vitro BP and LR clonase recombination reactions were carried out according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen) using pDON207 and as destination vector pDEST17
(Invitrogen). pDEST17 contains a N-terminal 6xHis-tag. pDEST17-PM25 and pDEST17-
Em6 were transferred into BL21-AI competent cells (Invitrogen) and recombinant protein
production was induced in the presence of 0.2% (w/v) arabinose at 37°C. Bacterial proteins
were extracted by sonication in 50 mM NaH2PO4, pH 8, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazol, 1
mM PMSF. The 6xHis-tagged recombinant proteins were purified by Ni-NTA affinity
chromatography (Ni-NTA Superflow, Qiagen) under native conditions according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. After digestion by enterokinase (EKMax, Invitrogen) according
to the manufacturer’s instructions, de-tagged MtPM25 and MtEm6 recombinant proteins were
separated from their tag Ni-NTA affinity chromatography, desalted and lyophilized.
Western blot analysis
Twenty µg of proteins per sample were separated by SDS-PAGE using 12% (w/v) acrylamide
separating gels. Following electrophoresis, the gels were transferred onto nitrocellulose
membranes (Schleicher and Schuell, Dassel, Germany) for 1 h at 100 V in 25 mM Tris (pH
8.3), 192 mM Glycine and 20% (v/v) methanol using a mini-transblot system (Bio-Rad,
Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was then blocked with Tris buffered saline (TBS: 10
mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, NaCl 150 mM) containing 1.5% Tween 20 for 45 min under constant
agitation and rinsed several times with TBS containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20 (TBST). The
membrane was incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised
against MtPM25 or MtEm6 (dilution 1: 10,000 in TBST). After washing in TBST, the
membrane was incubated for 1 h with an antirabbit IgG peroxidase conjugate (Biosource
International, Camarillo, CA, USA) diluted 1:50,000 in TBST. After washing in TBST and
TBS, immunodetection was performed by chemiluminescence according to Grelet et al.
(2005).
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
22
Fourier transform IR spectroscopy
Dry protein films were prepared by drying 5 µL droplets of a solution of lyophilized protein
in water (20 mg/mL) on circular (2*13 mm) CaF2 IR windows at 25°C. Fast drying was
carried out in a stream of dry air (3% RH) and slow drying above saturated NH4NO3 (67%
RH) in a ventilated box. The protein films lost most of their water within five min and 1 h,
respectively, but the samples were left overnight under these conditions before analysis.
Protein samples in D2O were obtained by the adding 0.5 µL D2O to the fast-dried specimens.
Each sample was hermetically sealed between IR-windows using a rubber O-ring and
mounted into a brass holder. These procedures were performed in a cabin continuously
purged with dry air (3% RH) to prevent rehydration of dry samples and exchange with H2O
vapour in the case of samples in D2O. IR spectra were recorded at room temperature on a
Fourier transform IR spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, UK,
model 1725) equipped with a liquid nitrogen-cooled mercury/cadmium/telluride detector and
a Perkin-Elmer microscope as described previously (Wolkers and Hoekstra, 1995). The
optical bench was purged with dry CO2-free air (Balston, Maidstone Kent, UK). The
acquisition parameters were 4 cm-1 resolution, 32 co-added interferograms, 2 cm s-1 moving
mirror speed, and 3600-1000 cm-1 wave number range. Spectral analysis and display were
carried out using Spectrum version 2.00 (Perkin Elmer). For protein studies the spectral
region between 1750 and 1350 cm-1 was selected. This region contains the amide-I and the
amide-II absorption bands of the protein backbones. Secondary structures were derived from
the shape of the amide I band, which is the most sensitive to the secondary structure of
proteins. Second derivative spectra were used to determine the number and the positions of
the secondary structure components as starting parameters for a curve-fitting procedure. To
quantify the contributions of these different components to the amide I band, a least square
iterative curve fitting was performed (Peakfit, Jandel Software, San Rafael, CA) to fit Voigt
line shapes to the original spectrum between 1720 and 1590 cm-1. Prior to curve fitting a
straight base line passing through the ordinates at 1720 and 1590 cm-1 was subtracted. The
proportion of each structure was calculated as the percentage of the sum of areas of all Voigt
bands having their maximum between 1698 and 1618 cm-1. Assignment of structures was
according to Byler and Susi (1986), Surewicz and Mantsch (1988) and Raussens et al. (1997).
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
23
Sequence data for MtPM25 and MtEm6 have been deposited with the Genbank data library
under the respective accession number DQ206870 and DQ206712.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank J. Brettner (SeedCo Australia) for the gift of the seeds, N Sommerer (INRA
Montpellier) for preliminary MALDI-TOF analyses and B. Ly-Vu for dissecting the
thousands of radicles used in this study.
LITERATURE CITED
Allison SD, Chang B, Randolph TW, Carpenter JF (1999) Hydrogen bonding between
sugar and protein is responsible for inhibition of dehydration-induced protein unfolding.
Arch Biochem Biophys 365: 289-298
Alsheikh MK, Svensson JT, Randall SK (2005) Phosphorylation regulated ion-binding is a
property shared by the acidic subclass of dehydrins. Plant Cell Environ 28: 1114-1122
Arenas-Mena C, Raynal M, Borrell A, Varoquaux F, Cutanda MC, Stacy RAP, Pagès
M, Delseny M, Culiañez-Macià FA (1999) Expression and cellular localization of Atrab
28 during Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Plant Mol Biol 40: 355-363
Asirvatham VS, Watson BS, Sumner LW (2002) Analytical and biological variances
associated with proteomic studies of Medicago truncatula by two-dimensional
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 2: 960-968
Avelange-Macherel, Ly-Vu B, Delaunay J, Richomme P, Leprince O (2005) NMR
metabolite profiling analysis reveals changes in phospholipid metabolism associated with
the re-establishment of desiccation tolerance upon osmotic stress in germinated radicles of
cucumber. Plant Cell Environ in press
Bateman A, Coin L, Durbin R, Finn RD, Hollich V, Griffiths-Jones S, Khanna A,
Marshall M, Moxon S, Sonnhammer ELL, Studholme DJ, Yeats C, Eddy SR (2004)
The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. Database Issue 32: D138-D141
Battista JR, Park M-J, McLemore AE (2001) Inactivation of two homologues of proteins
presumed to be involved in the desiccation tolerance of plants sensitizes Deinococcus
radiodurans R1 to desiccation. Cryobiology 43: 133-139
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
24
Bies N, Aspart L, Carles C, Gallois P, Delseny M (1998) Accumulation and degradation of
Em proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana: evidence for post-transcriptional controls. J Exp Bot
49: 1925-1933
Black M, Corbineau F, Gee H, Côme D (1999) Water content, raffinose, and dehydrins in
the induction of desiccation tolerance in immature wheat embryos. Plant Physiol. 120:
463-471
Blackman SA, Obendorf RL, Leopold AC (1995) Desiccation tolerance in developing
soybean seeds – the role of stress proteins. Physiol Plant 93: 630-638
Borrell A, Cutanda MC, Lumbreras V, Pujal J, Goday A, Culiàñez-Macià FA, Pagès M
(2002) Arabidopsis thaliana Atrab28: a nuclear targeted protein related to germination
and toxic cation tolerance. Plant Mol Biol 50: 249-259
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram
quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248-
254
Buitink J, Leprince O (2004) Glass formation in plant anhydrobiotes: survival in the dry
state. Cryobiology 48: 215-228
Buitink J, Leprince O, Hoekstra FA (2000) Dehydration-induced redistribution of
amphiphilic molecules between cytoplasm and lipids is associated with desiccation
tolerance in seeds. Plant Physiol 124: 1413-1426
Buitink J, Hoekstra FA, Leprince O (2002) Biochemistry and biophysics of tolerance
systems. In M Black, HW Pritchard, eds, Desiccation and Survival in Plants: Drying
without dying. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK, pp 293-318
Buitink J, Ly Vu B, Satour P, Leprince O (2003) The re-establishment of desiccation
tolerance in germinated radicles of Medicago truncatula Gaertn seeds. Seed Sci Res 13:
273-286
Byler DM, Susi H (1986) Examination of the secondary structure of proteins by deconvolved
FTIR spectra. Biopolymers 25: 469-487
Campalans A, Pagès M, Messeguer R (2000) Protein analysis during almond embryo
development. Identification and characterization of a late embryogenesis abundant
protein. Plant Physiol Biochem 38: 449-457
Carles C, Bies-Etheve N, Aspart L, Léon-Kloosterziel KM, Koorneef M, Echeverria M,
Delseny M (2002) Regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana Em genes: role of ABI5. Plant J
30: 373-383
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
25
Capron I, Corbineau F, Dacher F, Job C, Côme D, Job D (2000) Sugarbeet seed priming:
effects of priming conditions on germination, solubilization of 11-S globulin and
accumulation of LEA proteins. Seed Sci Res 10: 243-254
Cheng Z, Targolli J, Huang X, Wu R (2002) Wheat LEA genes, PMA80 and PMA1959
enhance dehydration tolerance of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) Mol Breeding 10: 71-
82
Cuming AC (1999) LEA proteins. In PR Shewry, R Casey, eds, Seed Proteins. Kluwer
Academic Press, The Netherlands pp 753-780
Dehaye L, Duval M, Viguier D, Yaxley J, Job D (1997) Cloning and expression of the pea
encoding SBP65, a seed specific biotinylated protein. Plant Mol Biol 35: 605-621
Ditzer A, Kirch H-H, Nair A, Bartels D (2001) Molecular characterization of two alanine-
rich Lea genes abundantly expressed in the resurrection plant C. plantagineum in response
to osmotic stress and ABA. J Plant Physiol 158: 623-633
Dure L III (1993) Structural motifs of Lea proteins. In TJ Close, Bray EA eds, Plant
responses to cellular dehydration during environmental stress, Current Topics in Plant
Physiology, Vol 10. ASPP Series, Rockville, MD, pp 91-103
Gallardo K, Job C, Groot SPC, Puype M, Demol H, Vandekerckhove J, Job D (2001)
Proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis seed germination and priming. Plant Physiol 126: 835-
848
Gallardo K, Le Signor C, Vandekerckhove J, Thompson RD, Burstin J (2003)
Proteomics of Medicago truncatula seed development establishes the time frame of
diverse metabolic processes related to reserve accumulation. Plant Physiol 133: 1-19
Garay-Arroyo A, Colmenero-Florest JM, Garciarrubio A, Covarrubias AA (2000)
Highly hydrophilic proteins in prokaryotes and eukaryotes are common during conditions
of water deficits. J Biol Chem 275: 5668-5674
Goyal K, Tisi L, Basran A, Browne J, Burnell A, Zurdo J, Tunnacliffe A (2003)
Transition from natively unfolded to folded state induced by desiccation in an
anhydrobiotic nematode protein. J Biol Chem 278: 12977-12984
Goyal K., Walton LJ, Tunnacliffe A (2005) LEA proteins prevent protein aggregation due
to water stress. Biochem J 388: 151-157
Grelet J, Benamar A, Teyssier E, Avelange-Macherel M-H, Grunwald D, Macherel D
(2005) Identification in pea seed mitochondria of a later embryogenesis abundant protein
able to protect enzymes from drying. Plant Physiol 137: 157-167
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
26
Hajduch M, Ganapathy A, Stein JW, Thelen JJ (2005) A systematic proteomic study of
seed filling in soybean. Establishment of high-resolution two-dimensional reference maps,
expression profiles, and an interactive proteome database. Plant Physiol 137: 1397-1419
Haris PI, Coke M, Chapman D (1989) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic
investigation of rhodopsin structure and its comparison with bacteriorhodopsin. Biochim
Biophys Acta 995: 160-167
Hoekstra FA, Golovina EA, Buitink J (2001) Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance.
Trends Plant Sci 5: 431-438
Houde M, Dallaire S, N’Dong D, Sarhan F (2004) Overexpression of the acidic dehydrin
WCOR410 improves freezing tolerance in transgenic strawberry leaves. Plant Biotech J 2:
381-387
Imai R, Chang L, Ohta A, Bray EA, Takagi M (1996) A lea-class gene of tomato confers
salt and freezing tolerance when expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 170: 243-
248
Kermode AR (1997) Approaches to elucidate the basis of desiccation-tolerance in seeds:
Seed Sci Res 7: 75-95
Leprince O, Harren FJM, Buitink J, Alberda M, Hoekstra FA (2000) Metabolic
dysfunction and unabated respiration precede the loss of membrane integrity during
dehydration of germinating radicles. Plant Physiol 122: 597-608
Liu Y, Zheng Y (2005) PM2, a group 3 LEA protein from soybean, and its 22-mer repeating
region confer salt tolerance in Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Res Comm 331: 325-
332
McCubbin WD, Kay CM, Lane BG (1985) Hydrodynamic and optical properties of the
wheat germ Em protein. Can J Biochem Cell Biol 63: 803-811
Meurs C, Basra AS, Karssen CM, van Loon LC (1992) Role of abscisic acid in the
induction of desiccation tolerance in developing seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant
Physiol 98: 1484-1493
Niogret MF, Culiañez-Macià FA, Goday A, Mar Albà M, Pagès M (1996) Expression and
cellular localization of rab28 mRNA and Rab28 protein during maize embryogenesis.
Plant J 9: 549-557
Page RMD (1996) TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal
computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12: 357-358
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
27
Prestrelski SJ, Tedeschi N, Arakawa T, Carpenter JF (1993) Dehydration-induced
conformational transitions in proteins and their inhibition by stabilizers. Biophys J 65:
661-671
Ramanjulu S, Bartels D (2002) Drought- and desiccation-induced modulation of gene
expression in plants. Plant Cell Environ 25: 141-151
Raussens V, Ruysschaert J-M, Goormaghtigh E (1997) Fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy study of the secondary structure of the gastric H1, K1-ATPase and of its
membrane-associated proteolytic peptides. J Biol Chem. 272: 262–270
Reyes JL, Rodrigo M-J, Colmenero-Flores JM, GIL J-V, Garay-Arroyo A, Campos F,
Salamini F, Bartels D, Covarrubias AA (2005) Hydrophilins from distant organisms can
protect enzymatic activities from water limitation effects in vitro. Plant Cell Environ 28:
709-718
Ried JL, Walker-Simmons MK (1993) Group 3 late embryogenesis abundant proteins in
desiccation-tolerant seedlings of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol 102: 125-131
Riera M, Figueras M, Lopez C, Goday A, Pagès M (2004) Protein kinase CK2 modulates
developmental functions of the abscisic acid responsive protein Rab17 from maize. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 9879-9884
Rorat T, Grygorowicz WJ, Irzykowksi W, Rey P (2004) Expression of KS-type dehydrins
is primarily regulated by factors related to organ type and leaf developmental stage during
vegetative growth. Planta 218: 878-885
Schiltz S, Gallardo K, Huart M, Negroni L, Sommerer N, Burstin J (2004) Proteome
reference maps of vegetative tissues in pea. An investigation of nitrogen mobilization
from leaves during seed filling. Plant Physiol 135: 2241-2260
Shih M-D, Lin S-C, Hsieh J-S, Tsou C-H, Chow T-Y, Lin T-P, Hsing Y-IC (2004) Gene
cloning and charaterization of a soybean (Glycine max L.) LEA protein, GmPM16. Plant
Mol Biol 56: 689-703
Singh S, Cornilescu CC, Tyler RC, Cornilescu G, Tonelli M, Lee MS, Markley JL (2005)
Solution structure of a late embryogenesis abundant protein (LEA14) from Arabidopsis
thaliana, a cellular stress-related protein. Protein Sci. 14: 2601-2609
Soeda Y, Konings MCJM, Vorst O., van Houwelinhen AMML, Stoopen GM,
Maliepaard CA, Kodde J, Bino RJ, Groot SPC, van der Geest A (2005) Gene
expression programs during Brassica oleracea seed maturation, osmopriming, and
germination are indicators of progression of the germination process and the stress
tolerance level. Plant Physiol 137: 354-358
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
28
Soulages JL, Kim K, Walters C, Cushman JC (2002) Temperature-induced extended
helix/random coil transitions in a group 1 late embryogenesis-abundant protein from
soybean. Plant Physiol 128: 822-832
Soulages JL, Kim K, Arrese EL, Walters C, Cushman JC (2003) Conformation of a group
2 late embryogenesis abundant protein from soybean. Evidence for poly (L-proline)-type
II structure. Plant Physiol 131: 963-975
Surewicz WK, Mantsch HH (1988) New insight into protein secondary structure from
resolution-enhanced infrared spectra. Biochim Biophys Acta 952: 115-130
Swire-Clark GA, Marcotte WR Jr (1999) The wheat LEA protein Em functions as an
osmoprotective molecule in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plant Mol Biol 39: 117-128
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DJ (1997) The ClustalX
windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality
analysis tools. Nucleic Acid Res 25: 4876-4882
Walters C, Farrant JM, Pammenter NW, Berjak P (2002) Desiccation stress and damage.
In M Black, HW Pritchard, eds, Desiccation and Survival in Plants: Drying Without
Dying. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK, pp 263-292
Watson BS, Asirvatham VS, Wang L, Sumner LW (2003) Mapping the proteome of barrel
medic (Medicago truncatula). Plant Physiol 131: 1104-1123
Wechsberg GE, Probert RJ, Bray CM (1994) The relationship between “dehydrin-like”
proteins and seed longevity in Ranunculus sceleratus L. J Exp Bot 45: 1027-1030
Wehmeyer N, Vierling E (2000) The expression of small heat shock proteins in seeds
responds to discrete developmental signals and suggests a general protective role in
desiccation tolerance. Plant Physiol 122: 1099-1108
Whitsitt MS, Collins RG, Mullet JE (1997) Modulation of dehydration tolerance in soybean
seedlings. Dehydrin Mat1 is induced by dehydration but not by abscisic acid. Plant
Physiol 114: 917-925
Williams B, Tsang A (1991) A maize gene expressed during embryogenesis is abscisic acid-
inducible and highly conserved. Plant Mol Biol 16: 919-923
Wilm M, Shevchenko A, Houthaeve T, Breit S, Schweigerer L, Fotsis T, Mann M. (1996)
Femtomole sequencing of proteins from polyacrylamide gels by nano-electrospray mass
spectrometry. Nature 379: 466-469
Wise J (2003) LEAping to conclusions: a computational reanalysis of the late embryogenesis
abundant proteins and their possible roles. BMC Bioinformatics 4: 52-71
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
29
Wolkers WF, Hoekstra FA (1995) Aging of dry desiccation-tolerant pollen does not affect
protein secondary structure. Plant Physiol 109: 907-915
Wolkers WF, van Kilsdonk MG, Hoekstra FA (1998) Dehydration-induced conformational
changes of poly-L-lysine as influenced by drying rate and carbohydrates. Biochim
Biophys Acta 1425: 127-136
Wolkers WF, McCready S, Brandt WF, Lindsey GG, Hoekstra FA (2001) Isolation and
characterization of a D-7 LEA protein from pollen that stabilizes glasses in vitro.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1544: 196-206
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
30
FIGURE CAPTION AND LEGENDS
Figure 1. Two dimensional electrophoresis of the heat stable proteome of non germinated
radicles excised from Medicago truncatula seeds that were imbibed for 16 h using 24 cm non
linear immobilized pH gradient strips (3-10). pI and molecular mass (in kDa) are noted.
Numbers indicate the spots that were identified.
Figure 2. The relation between desiccation tolerance and the water content of the radicles of
Medicago truncatula at different intervals during fast drying. Germinated seeds exhibiting a
protuded radicle of 2.8 and 5 mm were first incubated or not (control) in a PEG solution for 2
d then dried at different intervals. The data from 2 independent experiments are pooled
together.
Figure 3. Phylogenic tree of LEA proteins of Medicago truncatula. ClustalX was used to
create an alignment of the following translated tentative consensus that were found in the
Medicago database (http://www.tigr.org/tdb/tgi/mtgi). The alignment was bootstrapped
(n=1000 replicates) to create the final tree with the bootstrap values indicated. Underlined
LEA proteins indicate those that have been found associated with desiccation tolerance (see
Table III). BudCAR5 (TC 100264 homologue of Q9M603 of M. sativa); CapLEA-1a
(TC94389 similar to 049816 of C. arietinum); CapLEA-1b (TC112317 similar to 049816 of
C. arietinum); DHN (dehydrin; TC101013 similar to 023957 of G. max); DHN3 (or dehydrin-
like, TC 100921, similar to Q945Q7 P. sativum); DHN-Cog (dehydrin-cognate, TC106659
similar to Q43430 of P. sativum); DIP (drought induced protein, TC95389 similar to Q941N0
of R. raetam); ECP31 (TC 96862 similar Q96245 of A. thaliana); Em6 (TC96799 homologue
to P93510 of R. pseudoacacia); Lea14 (TC 101891, similar to P46519 of G. max); LEA5
(TC105834 similar to O24422 of G max), LEA D34a (TC102411 weakly similar to P09444
LEA D34 of G. hirsutum); LEA D34b (combination of TC107159 and –158, both similar to
P09444 LEA D34 of G. hirsutum); LEA-likea (TC108292 weakly similar to Q6Z4J9 of O.
sativa); LEA-likeb (TC 95012 similar to Q8LCW6 of A. thaliana); PM32 (mitochondrial
LEA, TC101811 and TC78559 of Q5NJL5 of P. sativum); MP2 (maturation polypeptide;
TC95538 and TC87025 similar to Q39871 of G. max); MtPM25 (this study); PM1 (TC96465
similar to Q01417 of G. max); PM10 (TC100258, TC85220 similar to Q39801 of G. max);
PM18 (or 35 kDa seed maturation protein, TC96265 similar to Q9ZTY1 of G. max), PM22
(translated BQ124186 similar to Q9XER5 of G. max); PM24 (TC96521 weakly similar to
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
31
Q9SEL0 of G. max); RAB21 (TC 107383 similar to P12253 of O. sativa); SBP65 (seed
biotinylated protein, TC102224 similar to Q41060 of P. sativum); SMP LEA-4 (TC94509
similar to Q9FNW8 of G. tabacina). Whenever possible, the classification according to Dure
(1993) and Cuming (1999) together with the PFam assignments are indicated. The scale bar
(number of substitutions/site) corresponds to the relative branch length.
Figure 4. Changes in three heat stable proteins identified as PM25 (A, B), Em6 (C, D) and
MP2 (E, F) associated with desiccation tolerance in germinating radicles of Medicago
truncatula. Representative 2D gels (A, C, E) and relative spot quantities (B, D, F) during
germination (open bars) and after a PEG treatment (black bars) in 2.8 and 5 mm long emerged
radicles. Spot numbers are taken from figure 1. pI and molecular mass (in kDa) are indicated
on the left gel. For MP2, the histogram corresponds to the most preponderant isoform (spot
19). Different letters shown above the bars represent significant differences after multiple
comparison of the means (P<0.05).
Figure 5. Changes in spots identified as PM18 (A, B) and SBP65 (C, D) that are associated
with desiccation tolerance in germinating radicles of Medicago truncatula. Representative 2D
gels (A-C) and relative spot intensities (B, D) corresponding to PM18 (B, spots 15-18) and
SBP65 (D, spots 1-5) during germination (open bars) and after a PEG treatment (black bars)
in 2.8 and 5 mm long radicles. Spot number assignment is taken from figure 1. pI and
molecular mass (in kDa) are indicated on the left gel. Different letters shown above the bars
represent significant differences after multiple comparison of the means (P<0.05).
Figure 6. Changes in several spots identified as DHN3 (A, B) and Budcar5 (C, D)
Representative 2D gels (A) and relative spot intensities (B) during germination (open bars)
and after a PEG treatment (black bars) in 2.8 and 5 mm long emerged radicles. Spot number
assignment is taken from figure 1. pI and molecular mass (in kDa) are indicated on the left
gel. Different letters shown above the bars represent significant differences after multiple
comparison of the means (P<0.05).
Figure 7. In silico expression analysis of LEA genes in Medicago truncatula identified in this
study (see table III). The number of expressed sequence tags present in various libraries that
were found at http://www.tigr.org/tdb/tgi/mtgi and exhibited similar characteristics (organs,
developing seeds, stress, etc.) were averaged and expressed as % of detected EST x1000. The
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
32
absence of value means that the EST was absent in the libraries. The corresponding libraries
are: leaf (T10110, 4046, 4049), flower (#9D5, #ARC), nodulated root (T1617, T10109, 4047),
seed (#ARD, T10493, T10494, T11127), drought (5413), biotic stress (#A8V, T11031 T1581,
T10014), N deficit (#8GI, 5518, #8GF), P starvation (5415), plant microbe interaction
(T1748, 7263, T10173, T1815, T1510, T1707, T1682, #ARE, #CDE, 5520).
Figure 8. Western blot analysis of MtPM25 (A-D) and MtEm6 (E-H) in relation to
desiccation tolerance: in radicles (A, E) and cotyledons (B, F) during seed imbibition; in
emerged radicles (C, G) having a length of 2.8 and 5 mm, before and after the PEG treatment;
in embryos (D, H) during the acquisition of desiccation tolerance during seed maturation (10-
40 days after pollination, DAP). Twenty (embryos, radicles) and 50 µg (cotyledons) of
soluble proteins were hybridized with rabbit antibodies against recombinant MtPM25 and
MtEm6. Independent protein extractions and immunoblots were performed in triplicates and
yielded identical results. Percentage of desiccation tolerance (DT) and molecular marker mass
(kDa) are indicated. DS, dry seeds.
Figure 9. FT-IR absorption spectra in the amide region of detagged, recombinant MtPM25
and MtEm6. Conditions of the proteins were: (A) hydrated in D2O, (B) after fast drying (FD)
in an air stream of 3% RH, and (C) after slow drying (SD) in circulating air of 67% RH.
Figure 10. Curve-fitting procedure illustrated for the recombinant MtEm6 after fast-drying in
an air stream of 3% RH. The absorption maxima of the different protein secondary structures
in the amide-I band were selected on account of peak positions in the second-derivative
spectrum (A). With these different components a least square iterative curve fitting was
performed to fit Voigt line shapes to the original spectrum between 1720 and 1600 cm-1 (B).
Prior to curve fitting a straight base line passing through the ordinates at 1720 and 1600 cm-1
was subtracted. Co-addition of all of the dashed peaks that were mathematically produced
resulted in a fit (crosses) that resembled the original absorption spectrum (grey line).
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
33
Table I. Characterization of the desiccation tolerance stages together with soluble protein and heat stable protein contents and average number of spots detected in Medicago truncatula radicles. N.G. stage corresponds to 16 h-imbibed, non-germinated seeds; 2.8 and 5 mm stages correspond to germinated seeds exhibiting protruded radicles of 2.8 or 5 mm in length, before (untreated) and after a 2d osmotic treatment at –1.7 MPa using a polyethylene glycol solution (+ PEG). Percentages of desiccation tolerance represent the average (± SE) of 3 independent experiments using 50 seeds. The threshold water content (g H2O/g DW; g/g) is defined as the water content at which viability is reduced by 50% during drying and was derived from Fig. 2. Protein content values (average ± SE) were obtained from 15 replicates of 100 radicles. N.D. not determined.
Stages of germination and osmotic treatment 2.8 mm 5.8 mm
N.G. Untreated + PEG Untreated + PEG Desiccation tolerance (%) 100 0 91 ± 6 0 0 Threshold water content (g /g) <0.03 0.3 <0.03 3.6 0.8 Protein content (µg/radicle) 60 ± 4 36 ± 5 32 ± 4 29 ± 2 23 ± 2 Heat stable protein content (µg/radicle)
17 ± 1 7 ± 1 5 ± 1 5 ± 0 5 ±1
Number of detected spots 328 ± 6 252 ± 2 267 ± 2 N.D. N.D.
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
34
Table II. Synopsis of expression profiles of heat stable proteins of Medicago truncatula radicles following the loss of desiccation tolerance during germination and the re-establishment of desiccation tolerance by a PEG treatment. The stages analyzed were non-germinated (tolerant, 1), 2.8 mm long emerged radicles before (sensitive, 2) and after PEG treatment (tolerant, 3). The percentage of spots is relative to the total amount of spots detected in the analysis. As an aid to the profile description, the bar diagrams schematize changes in the spot abundance.
Profile type Characteristics Nb
spots % of total
spots
1 1 2 3
constant levels in the 3 stages 54 13.8
2 1 2 3
highest levels before germination, decreasing significantly in the 2.8mm stage and remaining low in 2.8mm+PEG stage
111 28.4
3 1 2 3
higher levels in 2.8 mm radicles than in both desiccation-tolerant stages
32 8.2
4 1 2 3
low levels before and after germination, increasing significantly in PEG-treated 2.8 mm long radicles
44 11.3
5 1 2 3
levels decreasing steadily in the 3 stages 7 1.8
6 1 2 3
levels increasing steadily in the 3 stages 37 9.5
7 1 2 3
high levels before and after germination, thereafter decreasing significantly upon the PEG treatment
19 4.9
8 1 2 3
low levels before germination, increasing significantly in the 2.8 mm stage and remaining constant in 2.8mm+PEG stage
50 12.8
9 1 2 3
increased levels in both desiccation tolerant stages 23 5.9
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
35
Table III. Identified heat stable polypeptides that are associated with desiccation tolerance in radicles from Medicago truncatula. Identifier of consensus sequences were retrieved from the Medicago database (MtGI version 8, at http://www.tigr.org/tdb/tgi/mtgi) except for spot 36 which was identified in the version 7. NA indicates no MALDI or LC MS/MS was used in the identification. The group designations of the LEA proteins according to Cuming (1999) are indicated in brackets.
Cate-gory
Spota Exp. Mr/pI
MALDIb Q-TOFc Homology
Best matching TC/ GB #
Theor. Mr/ pI
A 21 32.5/4.50 NA 8 (44) Seed maturation protein PM25 (G. max) (group 5) CA917414 24.9/4.80 A 37 15.2/5.71 7 12 (53) Em protein (Robinia pseudoacacia) (group 1) TC96799 10.7/5.93 A 2 76.7/5.80 NA 9 (45) Sbp65a protein (SBP65) (P.sativum) (group 3) TC102224 38.7/5.59 A 3 76.0/5.80 NA 10 (114) Sbp65a protein (SBP65) (P.sativum) (group 3) TC102224 38.7/5.59 A 6 65.8/6.43 NA 1 (18) Sbp65a protein (SBP65) (P.sativum) (group 3) TC102224 38.7/5.59 A 36 17.5/6.46 7 NA Legumin precursor (P. sativum) TC85216 64.9/5.40 A 19 37.0/6.10 9 NA Maturation polypeptide MP2 (G. max) (group 3) TC95538 38.4/6.54 A 16 41.1/5.55 NA 7 (45) 35 kDa seed maturation protein PM18 (G. max) (group 3) TC96265 36.3/5.52 B 1 77.7/5.78 NA 7 (67) Sbp65a protein (SBP65) (P.sativum) (group 3) TC102224 38.7/5.59 B 4 75.5/5.95 NA 11 (120) Sbp65a protein (SBP65) (P.sativum) (group 3) TC102224 38.7/5.59 B 5 77.5/6.01 5 NA Sbp65a protein (SBP65) (P.sativum) (group 3) TC102224 38.7/5.59 B 11 42.5/6.30 NA 2 (33) DHN3 (dehydrin-like protein, M. sativa) (group 2) TC100921 31.2/6.45
a) Spot identification number (see Fig. 1); b) numbers of peptide matched are given when a significant hit was found, c) number of sequenced peptides by nanoscale LC-MS/MS. The values in brackets indicate the total number of amino acids sequenced once.
w
ww
.plantphysiol.orgon F
ebruary 18, 2018 - Published by
Dow
nloaded from
Copyright ©
2006 Am
erican Society of P
lant Biologists. A
ll rights reserved.
36
Table IV Band positions and individual contributions by the various secondary structures of the untagged recombinant forms of MtEm6 and MtPM25 in D2O (hydrated state) and after fast and slow drying, determined by curve-fitting of the composite amide-I band of the FTIR spectra (see Fig. 10 for details). Assignment of structures was according to Byler and Susi (1986), Surewicz and Mantsch (1988) and Raussens et al. (1997).
Em6 MtPM25 Conditions
Position ν (cm-1)
Area (%)
Position ν (cm-1)
Area (%)
Assignment
Hydrated (D2O)
1622 8 1625 18 Extended ß-sheet
1636 23 1638 26 Coil 1651 37 1653 33 α-helix 1667 20 1668 15 Turns 1680 10 1681 8 Turns 1692 2 1693 0 Extended ß-sheet Fast dried 1627 5 1627 11 Extended ß-sheet 1641 11 1639 14 Coil 1658 57 1658 54 α-helix 1678 20 1680 15 Turns 1692 7 1692 6 Extended ß-sheet Slowly dried 1623 5 1623 24 Extended ß-sheet 1641 15 1637 10 Coil 1655 60 1655 56 α-helix 1681 17 1680 9 Turns 1695 3 1690 1 Extended ß-sheet
w
ww
.plantphysiol.orgon F
ebruary 18, 2018 - Published by
Dow
nloaded from
Copyright ©
2006 Am
erican Society of P
lant Biologists. A
ll rights reserved.
76
43
21.5
17
4.5 5.5 6.0 7.6
1 2 3 4 5
6
7 8 9
11 12 13
2425
181715 16
19 20
2322
26
21
14
29
30
27
28
37
31 3233
3536
39
38
34
41
40
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
0.1
CapLea-1a
CapLea-1b 1000
PM18
MP2 999
PM1
SMP-LEA4 1000
301
PM10
PM32 459
386
320
LEA5
LEA-D34a
PM24
LEA-D34b
PM25
ECP31 803
673
1000 1000
311
DHN-Cognate
Lea14
LEA-likea
LEA-likeb 1000
996
196
RAB21
BudCar5
DIP 1000
368
DHN
DHN3 569
111
144
172
SBP65
Em6
280
G1 (D19), PF00477
G5 (D34), PF04927
(D73) PF03242
G2 (D11) PF00257
G2 (D11) PF00257
G3 (D7) PF 02987
G5 (D95), PF03168
G3 (D7) PF 02987
G4 (D113) PF 03760
G3 (D7) PF 02987
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4.5
37.5
31
15.2
18.7
5.7
NG
Radicle length2.8 mm
- PEG + PEG
A 5 mm
- PEG + PEG
G erm ination stagesNG 2.8 m m 5 m mN
orm
aliz
ed s
pot q
uant
ity (
X10
3 )
0 ,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0 controlP EG treated
a
b
c
d d
21
Germ ination stagesNG 2.8 m m 5 m mN
orm
aliz
ed s
pot q
uant
ity (
x103 )
0
5
10
15
controlPEG treated
a
c
dd
b
37
B
C D
E
Germination stages
NG 2.8 mm 5 mmNor
ma
lize
d sp
ot q
uant
ity (
x 1
03 )
0
4
8
12
16
a
b
c
d d
19
F
42
37
6.1 6.5
2019
2.8 mm
- PEG + PEG
2.8 mm
- PEG + PEG
NG 5 mm
- PEG + PEG
5 mm
- PEG + PEGNG
21
37
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Germination stagesNG 2.8 mm 5 mm
0
1
2
3
Germination stagesNG 2.8 mm 5 mmN
orm
aliz
ed s
pot q
uant
ity
(x10
3 )
0
1
2
3
Germination stagesNG 2.8 mm 5 mm
0
2
4
6
Germination stagesNG 2.8 mm 5 mm
4
7
11
1415 18
aa ab b
a a
c
aa a
aa a
b bb b
b
c
16 17
control PEG-treated
Germination stagesNG 2.8 mm 5 mmN
orm
aliz
ed s
pot q
uan
tity
( X
103 )
0
1
2
3
4
Germination stagesNG 2.8 mm 5 mm
0
1
2
3
4
Germination stagesNG 2.8 mm 5 mm
0
2
4
6
8
NG 2.8 mm 5 mm0
2
4
6
81 2 3 4 5
Germination stagesNG 2.8 mm 5 mm
0
1
2
a
bc
bd
b
a
c
b b
a
b
c
ed
a
b
c
d b
a
bc
d d
Germination stages
control PEG-treated
5.3 5.8
NG
Radicle length
2.8 mm 5 mm+ PEG- PEG - PEG+ PEG
42
15 1515 15 1716 16 1617 17
18 1817
1816
18
C
B
18171615
75.5
61
5.8 6.0
A
D1 5
4
3
2
1 5
4
3
2
1 5
4
3
2
1 5
4
3
2
1 5
4
3
2
NG 2.8 mm 5 mm+ PEG- PEG - PEG+ PEG
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
A
8703
52
6.1 6.5
NG
Radicle length
+ PEG2.8 mm 5 mm
- PEG - PEG+ PEG
37
1112
13 11 11 1112 13 12 1312 13 131211
B
31 31 32 3332 33
31
Germination stages
NG 2.8 mm 5 mm
Nor
mal
ized
spo
t qua
ntity
( x
103 )
0
2
4
632
Germination stages
NG 2.8 mm 5 mm0
2
4
633
Germination stages
NG 2.8 mm 5 mm0
2
4
6
control PEG-treated
a
b
a aa a a aa a
b
b
cbb
D
5.8 5.9
25.2
21.6
C+ PEG
2.8 mm 5 mm- PEG - PEG+ PEG
NG
control PEG-treated
Germination stagesNG 2.8 mm 5 mm
0
3
6
9
Germination stagesNG 2.8 mm 5 mm
0
6
12
18
Germination stagesNG 2.8 mm 5 mm
0
3
6
911 12 13
ab
ca
b
c c
cab
c
bd
a
a
Nor
mal
ized
spo
t qua
ntity
(X
103 )
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
D30262220181614
Maturation (DAP)
12 35 37 DS
25
37
% DT: 0 0 31 54 97 97 100 100
B E F
G
A
C
6 15 17 20 24Imbibition (h)
20 24 48 60Imbibition (h)
- - ++PEG:2.8 5
Radicle length (mm)
% DT: 0 96 0 0
0 0100% DT: % DT:
2.8 5Radicle length (mm)
- - ++PEG:
% DT: 0 96 0 0
100 98 59 0 0
3 6 15 20Imbibition (h)
4815 20Imbibition (h)
% DT: 100 0100100 100 98 0
H Maturation (DAP)
% DT:
30262220181614
0 31 54 97 97 10015
20
MtPM25 MtEm6
100
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
www.plantphysiol.orgon February 18, 2018 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.