66
Recent Advances in Environmental Asepsis Heather Hohenberger, BSN RN CIC CNOR Quality Improvement Consultant Indiana University Health, Academic Health Centers

Heather Hohenberger, BSN RN CIC CNOR Quality Improvement Consultant Indiana University Health, Academic Health Centers

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Heather Hohenberger, BSN RN CIC CNOR Quality Improvement Consultant Indiana University Health, Academic Health Centers
  • Slide 2
  • Conflicts of Interest The presenter has no conflicts of interest to disclose
  • Slide 3
  • Objectives After attending this course, participants will be able to: List several recent studies addressing the role that surfaces play in the transmission of healthcare- associated infections Identify trends in environmental asepsis in the procedural environment Describe new technologies that can be used to routinely evaluate the quality of environmental hygiene
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Additions Recommendations for cleaning and disinfection in the Pre/Post operative patient care area Operating and Procedure Rooms Sterile Processing areas Enhanced cleaning recommendations for multi-drug resistant organisms Quality and process improvement recommendations for evaluation of thoroughness in all applicable areas
  • Slide 6
  • Multidisciplinary Approach Strong recommendation for collaboration between Infection Prevention, Environmental Services, and organizational leadership regarding Selection of cleaning chemicals Selection of cleaning materials, tools, and equipment Establishment of cleaning frequencies When enhanced environmental cleaning procedures should occur Personnel responsible for cleaning patient care areas and equipment
  • Slide 7
  • Cleaning Chemicals Environmental protection agency (EPA) registered hospital-grade disinfectants should be used on environmental surfaces and equipment Surfaces should be cleaned with a detergent prior to disinfection Disinfectants should be applied and reapplied as needed to ensure proper dwell time Spray and misting methods should not be used to apply cleaning chemicals in procedural areas
  • Slide 8
  • Regulations Safety data sheets must be available and reviewed Follow manufacturers instructions for use along with local, state, and federal regulations for the preparation, handling, storage, and disposal of all chemicals If the cleaning chemical is removed from the original container, ensure the secondary container is labeled with the chemical name, concentration, and expiration date
  • Slide 9
  • Patient Safety Assess the environment frequently for cleanliness Floors should always be considered contaminated Protective barrier coverings should be used to cover surfaces if the surface cannot withstand disinfection or is difficult to clean Equipment should be cleaned and disinfected before being brought into the patient care area All patient positioning equipment should have a moisture-resistant and intact covering
  • Slide 10
  • Patient Safety A clean environment should be reestablished after the patient is transferred from the patient care area Procedural areas should be terminally cleaned An established schedule should be determined for terminal cleaning
  • Slide 11
  • Staff Safety All personnel should take precautionary measures to limit transmission of microorganisms when performing environmental cleaning and handling of waste materials Appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) use
  • Slide 12
  • Education Requirements All personnel should receive initial and ongoing education and competency verification on their understanding of the principles and the performance of the processes for environmental cleaning Cleaning / disinfection products available PPE requirements for chemical use Reconstitution ratios (if applicable) Product expiration parameters Storage, handling, and disposal requirements Safety data sheet location
  • Slide 13
  • Cleaning Policies Policies and procedures for environmental cleaning processes and practices should be developed, reviewed periodically, revised as necessary, and readily available in the practice setting
  • Slide 14
  • Quality Assurance Personnel should participate in quality assurance and performance improvement activities consistent with the facilitys plan to improve understanding of and compliance with the principles and processes of environmental cleaning Ongoing feedback can show if problems are improving, stabilizing, or worsening Obtaining data from quality assurance or performance improvement tools can tell if benchmark goals are met identify areas where additional help is needed
  • Slide 15
  • Process Monitoring Process monitoring is a necessary part of every facilitys environmental cleaning program Process monitoring must include compliance with regulatory standards review of products and manufacturers instructions for use cleaning procedures monitoring cleaning and disinfection practices reporting and investigation of adverse events outbreaks, product issues, corrective actions, evaluation
  • Slide 16
  • How should cleanliness be measured? Thoroughness of cleaning is the focus of performance improvement Measure cleaning practices visual observation of the cleaning process visual inspection of cleanliness fluorescent marking ATP monitoring cultures
  • Slide 17
  • Slide 18
  • AORN Environmental Cleaning toolkit Purpose educate all team members about the recommended practices on cleaning the perioperative environment promote patient safety prevent the spread of infection in the perioperative environment Available at http://www.aorn.org/Clinical_Practice/ToolKits/Environm ental_Cleaning_Tool_Kit/Environmental_Cleaning_Tool_K it.aspx
  • Slide 19
  • AORN Environmental Cleaning toolkit Resources Modules Power Point presentations used for orientation, review, annual competencies Checklists Specific for each practice setting, the cleaning checklists can be used for documentation and education Posters Helpful tools for quick reminders when providing targeted education for staff
  • Slide 20
  • Toolkit Modules Module 1 - Environmental Cleaning: Basics Module 2 - Environmental Cleaning: Preoperative and Postoperative Areas Module 3 - Environmental Cleaning: OR and Procedure Rooms Module 4 - Environmental Cleaning: Sterile Processing Areas Module 5 - Special Cleaning Procedures Module 6 - Quality and Process Improvement
  • Slide 21
  • End of Procedure Cleaning in the OR or Procedural Room Adapted with permission from Perioperative Standards and Recommended Practices. Copyright 2014, AORN, Inc, 2170 S. Parker Road, Suite 400, Denver, CO 80231. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 22
  • Terminal Cleaning in the Preoperative and Postoperative Care Area Adapted with permission from Perioperative Standards and Recommended Practices. Copyright 2014, AORN, Inc, 2170 S. Parker Road, Suite 400, Denver, CO 80231. All rights reserved.
  • Slide 23
  • What should be cleaned first? Clean from top to bottom clean to dirty areas Clockwise or counter-clockwise cleaning may be performed when used along with clean-to-dirty and top-to-bottom cleaning methods
  • Slide 24
  • Cleaning
  • Slide 25
  • Sample Cleaning Checklist Pre/Post Procedural Areas Pre- and Postoperative Areas Cleaning ChecklistPatient Discharge Completed 1.Patient monitors 1.Patient beds 1.Over-bed tables 1.Television remote 1.Call lights 1.Mobile and fixed equipment a.Suction equipment a.Medical gas regulators a.Imaging monitors a.Radiology equipment a.Warming equipment 1.Floors and wall if soiled or potentially soiled (eg, splash, splatter, or spray). 1.Patient transport vehicles including the straps, handles, side rails, and attachments should be cleaned and disinfected after each patient use.
  • Slide 26
  • MicroorganismReservoirPortal of Exit Means of Transmission Portal of Entry Susceptible Host Chain of Infection
  • Slide 27
  • Hand Hygiene Hand hygiene must always be performed when you remove PPE as soon as possible after hands are soiled
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Hot Topics One-step vs. Two-step cleaning / disinfecting ATP testing / Fluorescent marking Ultraviolet / Solar disinfection Copper / Silver containing disinfectants
  • Slide 30
  • Slide 31
  • Cleaning / Disinfection Clean The absence of visible dust, soil, debris, blood, or other potentially infectious material The first step Disinfection A process that kills most forms of microorganisms on inanimate surfaces The second step
  • Slide 32
  • One-step verses Two-step One-step product combines detergent and disinfectant, typically packaged as single-use wipes Two-step products separate detergent and disinfectant, requires user to perform cleaning and disinfection in two separate steps *Products shown are for demonstration only
  • Slide 33
  • One-step Wipes Various terminology used by wipe manufacturers make it difficult to choose which wipe will best fit the organizations needs Sanitizing Disinfectant Germicidal Sporicidal Virucidal Antibacterial *Products shown are for demonstration only
  • Slide 34
  • Disinfectant Wipes While wipes have gained tremendous popularity, there is poor evidence to support efficacy at the point of care Effectiveness of the wipe depends on Detergency ability to remove dirt on a visibly soiled surface Wetness ability to leave a layer of disinfectant on the surface of objects / equipment Disinfectant efficacy once the surface is dry disinfection stops, if residue is left behind there is no further antimicrobial effect
  • Slide 35
  • Slide 36
  • Wipe it Out Royal College of Nursing produced The Selection and Use of Disinfectant Wipes Ultimate resource for thorough understanding of benefits and limitations of one-step wipe products Available at http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/38 2538/003873.pdf http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/38 2538/003873.pdf
  • Slide 37
  • Infection Control Resources Proper Use of Healthcare Disinfectants: The Implications Associated with Off-Label Use of Disinfectants Available at http://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/webinars/2012/09/pro per-use-of-healthcare-disinfectants.aspx http://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/webinars/2012/09/pro per-use-of-healthcare-disinfectants.aspx Infection Control Facts: How to Select an Ideal Disinfectant Available at http://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=http%3A%2 F%2Fwww.csao.net%2Ffiles%2Fppt%2FHow%2520to%2520S elect%2520an%2520Ideal%2520Disinfectant.ppt http://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=http%3A%2 F%2Fwww.csao.net%2Ffiles%2Fppt%2FHow%2520to%2520S elect%2520an%2520Ideal%2520Disinfectant.ppt
  • Slide 38
  • Slide 39
  • ATP testing vs. Fluorescent marking CDC recommends all facilities develop programs to evaluate the thoroughness of high-touch object cleaning Emerging technologies take evaluation of cleaning and disinfecting beyond direct observation and checklists Subjective evidence verses objective evidence
  • Slide 40
  • Objective Methods for Evaluation Direct practice observation Swab cultures or agar slide cultures ATP bioluminescence Fluorescent markers
  • Slide 41
  • ATP Testing Measurement of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) on surfaces using a luciferase assay and luminometer Method Before room cleaning / disinfection occurs, a specialized swab obtains a sample from the surface area or object The swab is placed in the portable hand-held luminometer which identifies the amount of ATP in the sample After cleaning / disinfection has occurred, the items are swabbed and analyzed again
  • Slide 42
  • ATP Testing Advantages Easy to use Immediate teaching and feedback Disadvantages Results vary between systems A threshold value has not been determined in the healthcare setting for determining clean / contaminated Significant amount of ATP in the environment is non- microbiological Bleach based disinfectants alter the bioluminescence reaction Viruses and bacterial spores do not contain ATP
  • Slide 43
  • Fluorescent Marking Fluorescent powder, gel, or lotion can be used to mark objects prior to cleaning Method Objects are marked before cleaning occurs Evaluation occurs by shining a UV (black) light over the object to see if the product has been removed
  • Slide 44
  • Fluorescent Marking Advantages Ease of use Immediate teaching and feedback Disadvantages Some markers can be seen after the mark is applied, alerting the individual to clean the tagged object more thoroughly Some marking products can be difficult to remove from surfaces and equipment, leaving permanent stains
  • Slide 45
  • Comparison MethodEase of UseIdentifies Pathogens Useful for Teaching Directly Evaluates Cleaning Direct Observation LowNoYes Swab culturesHighYesUnknownNot determined Agar culturesGoodLimitedUnknownNot determined ATPHighNoYesNot determined Fluorescent marking HighNoYes
  • Slide 46
  • Comparing ATP Monitoring Units Article on ISSA Web site Using an ATP Monitoring System in Healthcare Settings Representatives from each major industry provider of ATP monitoring systems in healthcare contributed their perspective of ATP integration into practice Available at http://www.fmlink.com/article.cgi?type=Magazine&ti tle=Using+an+ATP+Monitoring+System+in+Health+C are+Settings&pub=ISSA+Today&id=41190&mode=sour ce http://www.fmlink.com/article.cgi?type=Magazine&ti tle=Using+an+ATP+Monitoring+System+in+Health+C are+Settings&pub=ISSA+Today&id=41190&mode=sour ce
  • Slide 47
  • Current Research - ATP Sciortino, C.V., & Giles, R.A. (2012). Validation and comparison of three adenosine triphosphate luminometers for monitoring hospital surface sanitization: A Rosetta Stone for adenosine triphosphate testing. American Journal of Infection Control, 40(8), pp. e233. Validation occurred for all three meters tested, but only one could be verified due to variations in system performance between units Recommends careful consideration of technologic application in the healthcare environment
  • Slide 48
  • Current Research Marking Presentation at the International Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infections (2010) by Rupp, M.E., Adler, A, Schellen, M., Cassling. K., Lyden, E., Fitzgerald, T., Sholtz, L., & Carling, P. Hospital-wide Assessment of Patient Room Environmental Cleanliness With the use of fluorescent marking, 10 high-touch surfaces were evaluated for cleaning efficacy 74% of high-touch surfaces were adequately cleaned
  • Slide 49
  • Several studies have shown us two certainties Cleaning practices are often subpar Improvements made through education and feedback do not last This leads us to reach out for new technologies that can be applied to the healthcare environment
  • Slide 50
  • Slide 51
  • Ultraviolet vs. Hydrogen peroxide Manual cleaning / disinfection relies on the individual to follow manufacturers stated contact time and appropriate distribution of the chemical across surfaces Even with vigorous cleaning, multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) can remain in the environment for months Both methods have published evidence of reduction of contamination in the healthcare setting
  • Slide 52
  • Ultraviolet Light Acts by breaking down the molecular bonds of DNA, causing cell destruction Requires appropriate intensity, exposure time, air movement, and bulb strength Can be used as an adjunct to manual cleaning / disinfecting practices
  • Slide 53
  • Hydrogen peroxide Acts by releasing the oxygen (oxidizing) from within the cell membrane of organisms, leading to cell death Available as a vapor, aerosolized dry mist, and vaporized hydrogen peroxide Active against bacteria, fungus, viruses, and spores Numerous systems available in various price ranges Can be used as an adjunct to manual cleaning / disinfecting practices
  • Slide 54
  • Comparison MethodAdvantagesDisadvantages UV light Effective against a wide range of organisms Ease of use No need to seal off air supply Expense Requires furniture movement Must be placed in middle of the room Use in unoccupied room only Hydrogen peroxide Effective against a wide range of pathogens More effective than manual disinfection No toxic by-products Disinfection of complex equipment Room must be unoccupied Requires sealing room and air supply Time Logistical issues
  • Slide 55
  • Current Research UV light Rutala, W., Gergen, M., & Weber, D. (2010). Room decontamination with UV radiation. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 31(10), pp. 1025-1028. Boyce, J., Havill, N., & Moore, B. (2011). Terminal decontamination of patient rooms using an automated mobile UV light unit. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 32(8), pp. 737-742. Both studies showed significant reduction of organisms despite high levels of contamination, including C diff spores
  • Slide 56
  • Current Research Hydrogen peroxide Falagas, M., Thomaidis, P., & Kotsantis, K. (2012). Airborne hydrogen peroxide for disinfection of the hospital environment for infection control: A systematic review. Journal of Hospital Infections, 78(3), pp. 171-177. Study shows vapor or dry mist distribution of hydrogen peroxide can effectively disinfect the hospital environment
  • Slide 57
  • Slide 58
  • Copper Acts by altering the structure of proteins, leaving them unable to perform their natural functions (inactive) Used in self-disinfecting surfaces Not a cleaning / disinfection strategy, rather this is a proactive approach to decreasing microbial load
  • Slide 59
  • Silver Containing Disinfectants Action is not entirely understood, but believed to have a germicidal effect on some bacteria, viruses, algae, and fungi Not toxic to humans Testing and standardization is difficult in the healthcare setting Used in self-disinfecting surfaces Not a cleaning / disinfection strategy, rather this is a proactive approach to decreasing microbial load
  • Slide 60
  • Comparison MethodAdvantagesDisadvantages Copper Not user dependent Continuous action Corrosion Can irritate skin Expense Few studies available for result validation Silver Not user dependent Continuous action No studies in the healthcare environment
  • Slide 61
  • Current Research Copper Karpanen, T., Casey, A., & Lambert, P. (2012). The antimicrobial efficacy of copper alloy furnishing in the clinical environment: A crossover study. Infection Control and Epidemiology, 33(1), pp. 3-9. Study found a reduction in organisms in the healthcare environment with the use of copper alloy materials However, the items must contain greater than 58% copper
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Healthcare Cleaning Bundles Havill, N.L., (2013) Best practices in disinfection of noncritical surfaces in the health care setting: Creating a bundle for success American Journal of Infection Control, 41(5), supplement, pp. S26-S30. Steps include Creating policies and procedures Selection of cleaning products Determining method of application Education Monitoring Providing feedback
  • Slide 64
  • References AORN Recommended Practices for Environmental Cleaning (2013). AORN Environmental Cleaning toolkit (2014). Association for the Healthcare Environment of the American Hospital Association. (2012) Practice Guidance for Healthcare Environmental Cleaning (2 nd Ed.) Royal College of Nursing. (2011) Wipe it out; One chance to get it right.
  • Slide 65
  • Questions?
  • Slide 66
  • Contact Information Heather Hohenberger, BSN RN CIC CNOR Quality Improvement Coordinator Indiana University Health, Academic Health Centers (317) 963-1344 office [email protected]