Summary Reports of the Workshops “RESPONSIBLE SCIENCE on Authorship , Mentoring, Misconduct and Dual Use”

Implemented at university Hassan II Casa, Morocco

Held on 20-21 Mai, 2016 Faculty of Science and Technics, Mohammedia

In Cooperation with US National Academy of Sciences

MENA Educational Institute on Responsible Science (MENA III)

Report made by Mohamed AZEQOUR For MENA III Reunion Meeting - June 11-12, 2016 in Istanbul

The Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Mohammadia (FSTM) component of the Hassan II University in Casablanca, is part of a network of eight FST through Morocco whose vocation is university education in science and technology. It works since its inauguration in 1994 to provide technical training and quality engineering, and distinguished by the relevance of his research. The FSTM is regulated access counting 8 departments and 13 laboratories. with more than 3,000 students, including 743 in the final year of master, 260 in license and 442 in engineering courses. It delivers more than 550 degrees per year.

DEAN AND FACILITATORS OF THE WORKSHOP

FACULTY OF SCIENCES AND TECHNICS OF MOHAMMEDIA

Summary Reports of the Workshops “RESPONSIBLE SCIENCE” Implemented at university Hassan II Casa, Morocco

Web site of the FSTM Announcement

CALL FOR WORKSHOP APPLICATION

GROUP - I - GROUP - II - GROUP - III -

Facilitator:

Pr L. MEDRAOUI

Participants: Sara AZMI

Asmae HACHI Asmâa CHAKHMANE Mohamed ACHMIT Noura AOUSSAR

Abdellah BOUKSAIM

Facilitator:

Pr L. SBABOU

Participants: Fatna ANOUAR

Zakaria KHATAR Othmane SKHOUNI Meriem ABOURI

Jihane FATHI Hajar BAKRAOUY

Facilitator:

Pr Y. HMIMSSA

Participants: Siham BAZINE

Zakaria MIGHOUAR Abderrahim LARHLIMI Fatima ezzahra FAOUZI

Majdouline EL HACHEMI Imane CHATTATE

GROUP - IV - GROUP – V -

Facilitator:

Pr F. MELLOUKI

Participants: Karim DÂNOUN Jamila LAKBIR Khadija SOFI

Ouafae DKHISSI Bouchra MERGAOUI

Marouane IHIA

Facilitator:

Pr M. AZEQOUR

Participants: Ghizlane DEROUICH Imane SERHSOUH Jihane MELLOUI

Siham BOUAZ Dounia BENTALEB Omar AKCHICHE

NUMBERS - 30 participants

Five groups of 6 participants 5 Facilitators

THE TARGET GROUP

Workshop groups

Age between

25 and 30 years

THE TARGET GROUP

BACKGROUND PHD student in different disciplinary fields:

Fields Student number

Biology 6

Geology 2

Chemistry 5

Physics 6

Mathematics 3

Informatics 2

Engineering 6

Total 30

CONDUCT OF WORKSHOP Performed in two days: 20 – 21 Mai, 2016

the duration of each session

is 2 hours

TEACHING OF THE ACTIVITY

The Teaching was performed: - According to methods of Active learning for all issues

- Using of case studies, group work, processing scenarios, discussions and synthesis.

- Using the formative and summative assessment to improve student understanding and

performance.

THE WORKSHOP MOMENTS

CERTIFICATION CEREMONY

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Larach Rabat Mohammedia Larach Rabat Mohammedia

Pre-assessment Post-assessment

Q1

Q2

Authorship Assessment I : Two months after joining a new research group, you are preparing to submit a manuscript based on work you had completed while in your previous position. Dr. Helix, one of your new colleagues, has just recommended that you include Dr. Spiral, the head of the new research group, as an author on the paper. When you point out that Dr. Spiral had made no contributions to the work, Dr. Helix observes that adding Spiral’s name would improve the chances for publication and increase your prospects for advancement within Spiral’s research group. 1. Based on this information, should you add Dr. Spiral’s name to the manuscript? __ Yes __ No 2. Would adding Dr. Spiral’s name as an author be unethical? __ Yes __ No

IMPROVING ANSWER

the answers are improved markedly approaching 100%. In Rabat, there is no change between pre-assessment and post-assessment, as this is the second workshop which is organized at faculty of Rabat.

Authorship Assessment II : Authorship is appropriate for someone who has approved the final manuscript and 3. provided the idea for a critical experiment. ___ 4. provided unique materials, critical to the experiments reported in the paper. 5. provided large amounts of unskilled work needed to complete project. ___ 6. performed an experiment using specialized equipment. ___ 7. provided unpublished data to augment data obtained for the paper. ___ 8. provided statistical analysis of data presented in the paper. ___ 9. organized the results and wrote the first draft of the paper. ___ Scientific Integrity text and cases in resp. cond. of research . Fourth Edition ASM Press. pp: 399-400.

IMPROVING ANSWER Pre-assessment Post-assessment

Larach Rabat Moham

Larach Rabat Moham

3 a: 4 b: 3 c: 1 d: 8 e : 4

2 3 12 9 1

7 0 7 10 6

a: 2 b: 4 c: 3 d: 7 e: 4

6 1 2 12 6

4 1 3 11 11

4 a: 5 b2 : 4 c: 6 d: 2 e: 3

4 10 2 8 3

7 3 4 11 5

a: 7 b: 7 c: 2 d: 3 e: 1

5 5 8 9 0

7 12 0 8 3

5 a: 4 b: 8 c :4 d : 4 e : 0

3 6 10 4 4

9 3 6 8 4

a: 4 b: 6 c: 5 d: 2 e: 3

5 2 8 10 2

9 10 1 10 0

6 a : 6 b : 2 c : 0 d : 10 e : 2

3 5 5 11 3

9 3 6 9 3

a: 3 b: 6 c: 1 d: 7 e: 3

5 1 5 7 9

7 8 4 2 9

7 a: 8 b: 4 c : 4 d: 4 e: 0

3 6 8 7 3

12 2 9 5 2

a: 9 b: 2 c: 4 d: 4 e: 1

7 2 8 6 4

10 9 6 5 0

8 a: 6 b: 2 c: 4 d : 5 e : 3

1 4 3 16 3

9 2 9 5 5

a: 4 b: 2 c: 0 d: 9 e: 5

6 0 3 15 3

7 7 2 11 3

9 a: 5 b: 0 c: 0 d: 13 e : 2

2 2 4 7 5

8 2 8 5 7

a: 3 b: 0 c: 1 d: 4 e: 12

6 1 0 8 12

3 6 0 7 10

the majority of participants of larach, Rabat and Mohammedia responded right to the 9th issue while they had a great confusion about other issues, thing that has been improved in the post assessment