HFE Program for the APR1400 · ―Steam Generator Tube Ruptur 11 th Pre-a ―Main Control Room Fire Application matrix demonstrating scenario set 18 ... ―Korean to English translatio

HFE Program fo

Responses to the JuResponses to the Ju

Audit Reco

on M

eeti

ng

on M

eeti

ng August

re-a

pp

lica

tio

Pre

-ap

pli

cati

o

Korea Hydro and Nu

7thP

r11

thP Korea Hydro and Nu

r the APR1400

une 3 through 7 HFE une 3 through 7 HFE

ommendations

13, 2013

uclear Power Co., Ltd.

APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

uclear Power Co., Ltd.

Meeting ObjectiveMeeting Objective

To discuss revisions, based on the Ju

HFE program and its documentation

the HFE Implementation Plansthe HFE Implementation Plans

Mee

tin

gp

pli

cati

on M

11th

Pre

-ap

1

Human Factors Engineering

une 3 through 7 NRC Audit, of the KHNP

as contained in the DCD Chapter 18 and

1 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Presentation OutlinPresentation Outlin

1. Proposed List of HFE Docum

2. Major Pre-audit Observation

3. Response Example – V&V IP

Mee

tin

g

4. Detail Audit Observations an

5. Questions

pp

lica

tion

M11

thP

re-a

p

2


nene

ments for DC

P

nd Response

2 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

HFE Documents fo

DCD Tier 1 for HFE and Tier 2 C

HFE Implementation Plans1) HFE Program Plan

2) OER3) FRA/FA4) TA

Mee

tin

g

)5) S&Q6) TIHA7) HSI Design

pp

lica

tion

M 7) HSI Design8) HFE V&V9) Design Implementation

11th

Pre

-ap

10) HPM

3


or DC

Chapter 18

Technical Reports1) Basic HSI Platform2) Style Guide3) V&V Scenarios

Result Summary Reports1) OER Report (*)2) FRA/FA Report (*)2) FRA/FA Report (*)* DC scope only, 15 months after

Docketing

3 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Major NRC Audit O

There is a substantial amount of tecExamples include:

KHNP R

Examples include:

KHNP Response;

All IPs are reviewed against NU

All IP d T h i l R t

Mee

tin

g

All IPs and Technical Reports ar

June NRC Audit

pp

lica

tion

M11

thP

re-a

p

4


Observation

chnical information missing.

REG-0711 Rev. 3 for completeness

i d t d th fi di i thre revised to remedy the findings in the

4 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Generic Revisions toGeneric Revisions toand the HFE Implem Ch18 and all Implementation Pla Ch18 and all Implementation Pla

June NRC Audit

Consistency between Ch 18 and Consistency between Ch 18 and

Alignment of IPs to NUREG-0711

Mee

tin

g

Expanded level of detail and add

Special emphasis placed on the

pp

lica

tion

M − Verification and Validation

− Task Analysis

11th

Pre

-ap

− Functional Requirements An

Editorial/English reviews

5


o the DCD Chapter 18o the DCD Chapter 18 mentation Plans

ans (IPs) are revised based on theans (IPs) are revised, based on the

the IPs and between IPs the IPs, and between IPs

1 Rev 3 structure and content

ded acceptance criteria

most challenging and complex IPs;

nalysis / Function Allocation

5 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Response ExampleSampling of Operational Con

Sampling Dimension;

A multidimensional sampling st

O ti l C ditiOperational Conditions

Mee

tin

gp

pli

cati

on M

11th

Pre

-ap

6


e - V&V IP (1/10)nditions for ISV

trategy is applied for the Sampling of

Proprietary

6 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Response Example

Plant Conditions Mapping Tables

Sampling of Operational Con

Plant Conditions Mapping Tables

Mee

tin

gp

pli

cati

on M

11th

Pre

-ap

7



ProprietaryProprietary

7 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Response Example

Plant Conditions Mapping Tables (c


Plant Conditions Mapping Tables (c

Mee

tin

gp

pli

cati

on M

11th

Pre

-ap

8


e - V&V IP (3/10)

continued)

nditions for ISV

Proprietarycontinued) Proprietary

8 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Response Example

Current Status of SOC;


Current Status of SOC;

Mee

tin

gp

pli

cati

on M

11th

Pre

-ap

9




9 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Response ExampleScenario Outline

Mee

tin

gp

pli

cati

on M

11th

Pre

-ap

10


e - V&V IP (5/10)


0 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Response ExampleScenario #1: SBLOCA with C

Mee

tin

gp

pli

cati

on M

11th

Pre

-ap

11


e - V&V IP (6/10)CBP/Displays Failures


1 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Response ExamplePreparation of Evaluation

Mee

tin

gp

pli

cati

on M

11th

Pre

-ap

12


e - V&V IP (7/10)

Proprietary

2 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Response ExampleMajor Steps of Scenario

Mee

tin

gp

pli

cati

on M

11th

Pre

-ap

13


e - V&V IP (8/10)

Proprietary

3 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Response ExamplePrimary Task Performance M

Mee

tin

gp

pli

cati

on M

11th

Pre

-ap

14


e - V&V IP (9/10)Measures

P i tProprietary

4 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Response ExampleSubjective Questionnaire

Mee

tin

gp

pli

cati

on M

11th

Pre

-ap

15


e - V&V IP (10/10)

Proprietary

5 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

p y

Audit Observation

The process used for determining thconditions to be tested during the ve

KHNP R V&V

the HFE program.

KHNP Response; V&V

A detailed process for the samp

added to the V&V IP (section 3

Mee

tin

g

added to the V&V IP (section 3.

The application of this SOC proc

further defined in the Technical R

pp

lica

tion

M further defined in the Technical R

(section 3.1, page 3-1)

11th

Pre

-ap

16


1

he sample of operational erification and validation phase of

ling of operational conditions has been

1 page 3 1)1, page 3-1)

cess to the definition of scenarios is

Report containing the scenariosReport containing the scenarios

6 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Audit Observation

The methodology for conducting Tasdescribed.

KHNP R TAKHNP Response; TA

The Task Analysis application of

use of workload analysis time a

Mee

tin

g

use of workload analysis, time a

needs and crew qualification req

and 3 3 6 page 3-8 )

pp

lica

tion

M

and 3.3.6, page 3-8 )

A detailed approach to the meth

example will be submitted

11th

Pre

-ap example will be submitted

17


2

sk Analysis was not completely

f the Hierarchical Task Analysis and its

available time required crew staffingavailable, time required, crew staffing

quirements has been added (section 3.3

hodology description with an illustrative

7 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Audit Observation

Scenarios to test operator performasystem interfaces were not providedValidation (ISV)

KHNP Response; V&V scenarios

Validation (ISV).

Using the SOC a set of seven coand are included in a separate T

Scenarios include:

Mee

tin

g

― Small Break Loss of Coolant A― Anticipated Transient Without T― Excessive Steam Demand w/A

pp

lica

tion

M ― Loss of all Feed Water ― Station Blackout ― Steam Generator Tube Ruptur

11th

Pre

-ap

― Main Control Room Fire Application matrix demonstrating

scenario set

18

Scenario summary has been ad


3

nce and the adequacy of human d as part of the Integrated System

s omplete scenarios have been defined Technical Report

Accident w/CBP/Displays FailuresTrip w/DCS FailureAlarm Failures

re

g all SOC have been applied in the

8 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

ded to the report

Audit Observation

Performance measures used duringpersonnel performance were not propersonnel performance were not pro

KHNP Response; V&V performan

Explicit pass/fail and diagnostic

Mee

tin

g

described (section 5.5, page 5-4

Performance measures are map

pp

lica

tion

M (section 5.5.1, page 5-5)

11th

Pre

-ap

19


4

g ISV testing to measure plant and ovidedovided.

nce measures

performance measures have been

4)

pped into each scenario

9 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Audit Observation

An explanation for the basis for the t id dnot provided.

KHNP Response; Basic HSI Platf

The Basic HSI Platform design d

Mee

tin

g

concept of operations, and desig

(section 1.2, page 1)

pp

lica

tion

M The basis for the Basic HSI in th

design is described in the Basic

11th

Pre

-ap

(section 2.0, page 2)

20


5

Basic HSI Design platform was

form

describes the HSI design inputs,

gn description of HSI.

he CE System 80+ and the SKN 3&4

c HSI Platform Technical Report.

0 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Audit ObservationNUREG-0711 Task Analysis acceptaof personnel needed to do the task) knowledge and abilities required toknowledge and abilities required to addressed.

KHNP Response; TA

The TA methodology and IP hav

Mee

tin

g

assessment of the number of pe

knowledge and their abilities (se

pp

lica

tion

M The IP revision also includes an

(scope), 4 (relationships among

11th

Pre

-ap

(page 1-2, page 3-10, page 4-1)

All task considerations from NU

21

included (section 3.2, page 2-3)


6ance criterion 6 (related to number and criterion 7 (related to

perform the task) were notperform the task) were not

ve been revised to include the

ersonnel required to do the task, their

ection 3.1, page 3-1, page 3-11)

n expanded discussion of criteria 1

tasks), and 9 (IHA)

)

REG-0711 Rev 3 Table 5-1 have been

1 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Audit Observation

NUREG-0711 OER acceptance criteto identify operating experience) andidentif ing important h man actionsidentifying important human actions not addressed.

KHNP Response; OER

Operator interviews have been a

Mee

tin

g

sub criteria of criteria 4 of NURE

process has been expanded (se

pp

lica

tion

M Identification of HAs from prede

of their relevance to the APR140

11th

Pre

-ap


22


7

erion 4 (related to using interviews d criterion 5 for (related to from predecessor designs) erefrom predecessor designs) were

and are used to identify OE for the 6

EG-0711 Rev 3. The description of this

ection 4.1, page 4-1)

cessor designs and the determination

00 design descriptions are added

2 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Audit Observation

HFE process elements mentioned incorresponding Verification and Validsampling of operational conditions, o

KHNP Response; V&V, TA

SOC has been added to the V&

Mee

tin

g

definition (section 3.0, page 2-3)

Methodology for the TA has bee

pp

lica

tion

M OSD is deleted from the TA met

11th

Pre

-ap

23


8

n the DCD are not included in the dation Implementation Plan (e.g., operational sequence diagrams).

&V IP and applied in the scenario

)

en unified between the IP and Ch 18,

thod

3 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Audit Observation

Numerous grammatical and sentencmaking the meaning of the materialmaking the meaning of the material

KHNP Response;

An editorial review has been ma

Mee

tin

g

18 for;

― Korean to English translatio

pp

lica

tion

M ― Grammar, sentence structu

― Use of ambiguous terminolo

11th

Pre

-ap

24


9

ce structure issues contribute to unclearunclear.

ade of all the IPs and the DCD chapter

on clarity and meaning

ure, and understandability

ogy in commitments

4 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Audit Observation

The task analysis IP defines HierarcDecomposition but does not describimplemented (i.e. who is responsible

KHNP Response; TA

A detailed level of description to

Mee

tin

g

been added, including an illustra

The IP contains a description of

pp

lica

tion

M qualifications and how they app

(section 3.1.8)

11th

Pre

-ap

Integration of the TA results in th


25


10

chal Task Analysis and Task be how the methods will be e, how these will be integrated).

o the application of the TA method has

ative example (section 3.0, page 3-1)

f the TA team, their minimum

ly subject matter experience

he HFE program is now described

5 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Audit ObservationThe description for the APR1400 HFauthority lacks sufficient detail to detthe overall engineering organizationthe overall engineering organizationauthority.

KHNP Response; HFE PP

The placement of the HFE desig

Mee

tin

g

process has been clarified (sect

The HFE design teams decision

pp

lica

tion

M coordination have been clarified

The organization chart containe

11th

Pre

-ap

expanded to one additional leve

discussions during the June Aud

26


11FE design team placement and termine where the team fits into

its reporting relationship and, its reporting relationship, and

gn team and its authority in the design

tion 2.2, page 2)

n making process and its lines of

d (section 3.4, Figure 3, page 9)

ed in the HFE Program Plan has been

el up in the organization, as per

dit (section 2.2, Figure 1, page 2)

6 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Audit Observation

Although the FRA/FA mentions “sucfunctions, the concept of success paexplained or illustrated.

KHNP Response; FRA/FA

A more detailed discussion of su

Mee

tin

g

4.1.2, page 9)

The relationship between the AP

pp

lica

tion

M the CE System 80+ is described

11th

Pre

-ap

27


12

ccess paths” for accomplishing aths is merely mentioned but not

uccess paths has been added (section

PR1400’s success paths and those of

d in a new table (Table 2)

7 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Audit Observation

The current ITAAC format is not suffcompletion. The acceptance criteria Summary Report must be providedSummary Report must be provided product and evaluation results mustthe HFE design process was implem

KHNP Response; ITAAC

The ITAAC format and content i

Mee

tin

g

The ITAAC format and content i

format and content provided by

pp

lica

tion

M11

thP

re-a

p

28


13

ficient to determine element do not reflect that a Results to document the final designto document the final design t be presented that demonstrate mented as described in the DCD.

s being revised to match the samples being revised to match the sample

the NRC Staff during the June Audit

8 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Summary

KHNP h f ll i d th KHNP has carefully reviewed thincluding the Audit Report and tthe AuditOb ti t d i th A Observations reported in the Auissues, resulting in the revision Implementation PlansT h i l i f ti d i

Mee

tin

g

Technical information and reviewRev 3 has been added to the do

Translation, grammatical and set d lti i d

pp

lica

tion

M corrected resulting in more unde The HFE ITAAC format, IP acce

Report content will demonstratei l d d ib d i h

11th

Pre

-ap implemented as described in th

29


h lt f th J 3 th h 7 A dithe results of the June 3 through 7 Audit, the discussion that took place during

dit R t t t d iudit Report were treated as generic of the DCD Chapter 18 and all

it i t i d i NUREG 0711w criteria contained in NUREG-0711 ocumentsentence structure issues have been

t d bl terstandable reports eptance criteria and Results Summary e that the HFE design process was

DCDe DCD

9 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

QuestionsM

eeti

ng

pp

lica

tion

M11

thP

re-a

p

30


Proprietary

0 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP

Abbreviation List AOP abnormal operating procedu APR1400 Advanced Power Reactor 14 CBP computer-based procedure DCS distributed control systemy DA diagnostic action EOP emergency operating proced FRA/FA functional requirements ana HAs human actions HAs human actions HFE human factors engineering HPM human performance monito HSI human-system interface IHA i t t h ti

Mee

tin

g

IHA important human actions TIHA treatment of important huma IP implementation plans ISV integrated system validation

pp

lica

tion

M KHNP Korea Hydro and Nuclear P OE operating experience OSD operational sequence diagra SKN 3&4 Shin Kori Unit 3 and 4

11th

Pre

-ap

S&Q staffing and qualifications SOC sampling of operational con SOP system operating procedure SPTA standard post trip action

31

p p TA task analysis V&V verification and validation


ure400

durealysis / function allocation

ring

an action

nower Co., Ltd

ams

ditionse

1 APR1400-E-I-EC-13005-NP