Upload
walt
View
43
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Hi-Lumi WP3 meeting Update on the Q1 to D1 cryostat Jan 28, 2014. Outline Cryostat cross section options Elliptical interconnect sleeve feasibility Piping layout and longitudinal integration Summary. [email protected]. Pipe specifications (from Oct 2013). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Hi-Lumi WP3 meeting
Update on the Q1 to D1 cryostatJan 28, 2014
Delio.
Ramo
s@ce
rn.ch
Outline Cryostat cross section options Elliptical interconnect sleeve feasibility Piping layout and longitudinal integration Summary
Del
io.R
amos
@ce
rn.c
h
Pipe specifications (from Oct 2013)
2
Cryo spec* Possible standard dimensions MaterialOD thickness ID
HeII in (Y1) 12 copperHeII in (Y2) 12 copperHeII out (pumping line) 97 106 3 100 1.4432, weldedBS in (C') 20 23 1.5 20 1.4404, seamlessBS capillaries (4x) 6.5Quench return line 40 44.5 2 40.5 1.4404, seamlessShield in (E ) 30 35 2.5 30Shield out (F) 30 35 2.5 30Bayonet HX-1 68 copperBayonet HX-2 68 copper*by Rob Van Weelderen
Can the pumping line be
smaller now?
3
Mike Ane
rella, N
ov
2013
Del
io.R
amos
@ce
rn.c
h
4
Increased diameter & centered cold mass
Maximum transport width in the tunnel is 1250 mm, simulation needed (C. Bertone)
Simplest cryostat shape
Short support post → higher heat load
Piping integration ok!
Del
io.R
amos
@ce
rn.c
h
5
Elliptical cryostat
Simplified piping integration
Standard transport width
Standard support post
Interconnect sleeve is the main challenge (in contact with industry)
Cold mass can be centered
Del
io.R
amos
@ce
rn.c
h
Integration in the tunnel: large cylindrical vs elliptical On integration CAD models both cylindrical and elliptical versions seam ok (C.
Collazos) . Elliptical has the advantage of easier access for personnel on the sides.
6
Elliptical interconnect sleeve
7
Del
io.R
amos
@ce
rn.c
h
Komplaflex feasibility study and cost estimation
2 mm thick shell Flexibility +/-5 mm axial and transverse Buckling safety factor 4.9
Cost (Offer from Kompaflex) 16 kCHF tooling (one-off) 6.7 kCHF/unit (on a basis of 25 unit order)
For comparison, cost of standard interconnect sleeves 2.1 kGBP/unit (price 2000-2001, LHC series)
8
Pipe routing - Some layout variants...
9
Q1 Q2a Q2 b CPQ3 D1
Q1 Q2a Q2 b CPQ3 D1
Q1 Q2a Q2 b CPQ3 D1
A first guess for the 3 jumpers variant
10Split beamscreen loop in two?
11
12
13
Interconnect length with LHC QQS
14
1125
Current HL-LHC layout interconnect length: 810 mm
Using the LHC quad QQS as reference
15
~630
~430
LHC QQS length determined by the phase separator.Eventual gain with smaller phase separator ~200 mm, i.e. IC length becomes 925 mm.
Del
io.R
amos
@ce
rn.c
h
Summary 3 vacum vessel cross sections on the table: ID 890, ID 985, elliptical
890 by ~1112 Elliptical vessel: Interconnect sleeve is technically feasible at a
reasonable cost Assuming relatively small volume phase separators, the interconnect
length is determined by the jumper diameter. We need: First draft of piping diagrams (how many pipes in the jumper and inside
the cryostat) Hydraulic cross sections (how big are such pipes)
What can we do to simplify fabrication/ assembly/ interchangeability? Phase separators even were they are not needed? More space required Minimise the number of jumpers? More pipes along the cryostat cross
section Additional pipes for busbars?
16