28
High energy perspectives (and conclusions) Philippe Ferrando APC Laboratory (UMR 7164) - Service d’Astrophysique CEA/Saclay APC Conference High Energy Phenomena in the Galactic Center June 17, 2005

High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

High energy perspectives (and conclusions). Philippe Ferrando APC Laboratory (UMR 7164) - Service d’Astrophysique CEA/Saclay. APC Conference High Energy Phenomena in the Galactic CenterJune 17, 2005. The Galactic Centre : an exciting and growing field. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

High energy perspectives

(and conclusions)

Philippe FerrandoAPC Laboratory (UMR 7164) - Service d’Astrophysique CEA/Saclay

APC Conference High Energy Phenomena in the Galactic Center June 17, 2005

Page 2: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

The Galactic Centre : an exciting and growing field

Exciting :

• closest look we can have to a Super Massive Black Hole and its complex surroundings in the Universe - Potential link with more distant AGNs

• potentially harboring dark matter, UHE cosmic-ray accelerator…

Growing :

New high quality high energy data :

• X-rays [0.1–10 keV] Chandra & XMM–Newton 1999 -…

• -rays [0.02-10 MeV] Integral 2002 -

• TeV -rays [0.1–20 TeV] HESS 2003 -

Multi Wavelength Campaigns with radio and NIR

Page 3: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

Chandra & XMM–Newton

Angular resolution :

resolving this complex region, and measuring the quiescent spectrum of SgrA*

High throughput : detailed spectro-imaging up to 10 keV

Page 4: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

Chandra and XMM–Newton

Sensitivity : acces to short time variabilityG

alac

tic L

atitu

de

X-ray flares from SgrA*, look for periodicity…

Page 5: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

INTEGRAL

Sensitivity and angular resolution : mapping this complex region

• IBIS/ISGRI mosaics in different energy bands: spectrum 20-120 keV

• Possible shift of the central source between Sgr A and 1E1743

20-30 keV

40-60 keV

30-40 keV

60-85 keV

Page 6: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

HESSSensitivity, angular resolution, large Field of View

H.E.S.S. Preliminary

Page 7: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

But questions still open…

What makes the 6.4 keV line ?

Nature of hot component ? Origin of the large scale 511 keV line ?

Page 8: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

But questions still open…

IntegralIntegral

How many sources ? Spectrum of SgrA* ?

Are Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays accelerated at the GC ?

Page 9: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

What can we count on for sure ?

Gamma-ray sources and UHECR connection

AGASA excess map in the a posteriori energy band [1017.9 – 1018.3] eV

15°

GC

Completion in 2006 Unprecedented statistics expected

Angular resol. 0.5–1°

GC and AGASA/Sugar prime targets

?

AUGER

Page 10: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

What can we count on for sure ?

Gamma-ray - Neutrinos connection

ANTARES

Completion in 2007

Max of signal expected @ ~ 10 TeV

Very low bckgd for point sources

Angular resol. @ 10 TeV ~ 0.2°

Expected rate (HESS) very low 0.02 evt/year

but surprises possible…

Clear need for a km3 experiment in a longer term

Page 11: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

What can we count on for sure ?

AGILE gamma-ray telescope

Small ASI mission - launch date early 2006

Anticoincidence

SuperAGILE

Si tracker

Mini-Calorimetre

GRID : E-range : 30 MeV – 30 GeVFoV 2.5 sr 36 arcmin @ 1 GeV

Improve EGRET error box radius by a factor of 2

Page 12: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

What can we count on for sure ?

GLAST/LAT EGRET

E range : 0.02 -300 GeV 0.02-30

E resolution : 10 % 10 %

Eff. Area : 8000 cm2 1500

Field of view > 2 sr 0.5 sr

Ang. Resol. ~ 3o @ 100 MeV 5.8°

~ 0.15o > 10 GeV

Sensitivity <6 x 10-9 cm-2 s-1 ~ 10-7

Source locat. 0.5 - 5 arcmin 5–30

The GLAST mission : launch mid 2007

Orders of magnitude improvement upon EGRET

Page 13: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

What can we count on for sure ?

Upgrade : HESS II

• Lower threshold to extend the energy-range in mono-telescope mode

• Better sensitivity at high energies in stereo

Reduce GC source position uncertainty

now 4'' ± 10''stat ± 20''syst from Sgr A* (1 pc)

Atmospheric Cerenkov (stress on HESS but also MAGIC, VERITAS,

CANGAROO)

Page 14: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

What can we count on for sure ?

Full spectral coverage in

gamma-rays !

• Connection space-ground

• Variability

Page 15: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

And in a longer term ?

An absolute necessity : get the angular resolution and the sensitivity down by orders of magnitude above 10 keV

Page 16: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

XMM-Newton GC Survey 0.3-9 keV0.0°

0.0°

0.0° 359.0°1.0°

INTEGRAL GC Survey 20-40 keV

(Bel

ange

r et

al 2

005,

in p

rep.

)

(

Dec

ourc

helle

et

al.

2003

)

Sgr A

Sgr B2

Page 17: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

The 10 keV sensitivity gap reason

0.1–10 keV : focusing opticsSpatial resolution : 15 arcsecHigh signal to noise

XMM–Newton

15 keV–10 MeV : coded masksSpatial resolution : 12 arcminModerate signal to noise

INTEGRAL

Page 18: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

The necessary future : use focusing optics as in longer wavelengths

In hard X-rays : feasible on a large energy range by extension of the « usual » soft X–rays techniques

Focusing using a grazing incidence nested shells Wolter I mirror

• Long focal length for high reflectivity at high energy

Projects NuSTAR and SIMBOL-X

Page 19: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

Basically : long focal length telescope, using grazing incidence X–ray optics, with mirror and detectors mounted on two different spacecraft in formation flying.

Characteristics

Energy range :0.5–70 keV

Resolution : < 130 eV @ 6 keV, 1 % @ 60 keV

Angular resol. : < 30 arcsec (local. < 3 arcsec)

Effective area : > 550 cm2 E < 35 keV 150 cm2 @ 50 keV

Sensitivity : 5 10-8 ph/cm2/s/keV (E < 40 keV)

(5 , 100 ks, E = E/2)

The Simbol-X mission

Page 20: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

Optics (nominal)

• Direct heritage from XMM–Newton

• Long focal length for high reflectivity at high energy

• Nickel shells with single layer Pt coating, obtained by well proven electroforming replication method

• Low mass obtained via a reduced thickness of shells

: ~ 30’’ HEWFOV : ~ 6 arcmin580 cm2 @ 30 keV

Shell diameters : 290 to 600 mmFocal length : 30 mAngles : 0.07° to 0.142°Shell thickness : 0.12 to 0.30 mmNumber of shells : 100Total mass : 213 kg

Page 21: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

CdZnTe

SDD

< 17 keV > 17 keV

Low energy detector (450 m Silicium)

High energy detector (2 mm Cd(Zn)Te)

Optical filter (0.1 m Al)

Anticoincidence (BGO)

Requirements

• Pixel size of ~ 500 m (gives good oversampling of the 4.4 mm PSF)

• Full diameter of focal plane : 6 cm

• Fast response detectors for full anticoincidence scheme

• Avoid constraining cooling

• Low energy response down to 0.5 keV

• Good spectral resolution for Iron line

Focal plane

SDD CdZnTe

Page 22: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

Sensitivity

1 arcmin diameter region, 1 Ms exposure, E = E/2

XMM INTEGRALSIMBOL-X

Page 23: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

The central 2 degrees > 20 keV

today

1.0°

INTEGRAL GC Survey 20-40 keVSgr A

Sgr B2

0.0° 359.0°

in 2012with Simbol-

X

Page 24: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

SIMBOL-X3 , 1 hour

Testing accretion models with SIMBOL-X

•Measurement of spectra for a large range of flare intensities

•Access to the high energy range, discriminating models

•Quiescent spectrum at ~ 40 keV

Liu & Melia, 2002

Page 25: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

Galactic Centre Diffuse Emission

(Decourchelle et al. 04)

Page 26: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

Galactic Centre seen by SIMBOL-X

Spectrum in a 1 arcmin2 regionExposure time = 84 ks

Simulation > 10 keV, 10 x 10 arcmin2

Total exposure = 300 ks

(A. Decourchelle & J. Ballet)

Page 27: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

Simbol–X status

•Selected by CNES for phase 0 assessment (4 missions kept)

•Phase A start, autumn 2005 (2 missions kept)

•Selection end 2006 (1 mission kept)

•Consortium led by France with a strong Italian involvment, and a firm participation of Germany

•Mission proposed early 2004 to CNES in response to a call for scientific missions using spacecrafts in formation flying

•Launch date : 2012 - 2 years of science observations

Page 28: High energy perspectives (and conclusions)

Conclusions

The Galactic Centre

an exciting and growing field, with a rich future !

A lot of important results to come in the next years, but will not solve all questions

A deeper look possible early next decade with currently designed new generation of instruments