Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HIGH STATISTICS SPSCATTERING EXPERIMENT
AT J-PARCKoji Miwa (Tohoku univ.)for the E40 collaboration
CollaboratorsTohoku Univ. : T. Aramaki, N. Chiga, N. Fujioka, M. Fujita, R. Honda, M. Ikeda, Y. Ishikawa, H. Kanauchi, S. Kajikawa,
T. Koike, K. Matsuda, Y. Matsumoto, K. Miwa, S. Ozawa, T. Rogers, T. Sakao, T. Shiozaki, H. Tamura,H. Umetsu
JAEA : S. Hasegawa, S. Hayakawa, K. Hosomi, Y. Ichikawa, K. Imai, H. Sako, S. Sato, K. Tanida , T.O. Yamamoto,
J. Yoshida
KEK : Y. Akazawa, M. Ieiri, S. Ishimoto, I. Nakamura, S. Suzuki, H. Takahashi, T. Takahashi, M. Tanaka, M. Ukai
RIKEN : H. Ekawa
Chiba Univ. : H. Kawai, M. Tabata
2
Kyoto Univ. : S. Ashikaga, T. Gogami, T. Harada, M. Ichikawa,T. Nanamura, M. Naruki, K. Suzuki
Osaka Univ. : K. Kobayashi, S. Hoshino, Y. Nakada, R. Nagatomi, M. Nakagawa, A. Sakaguchi
RCNP : H. Kanda, K. Shirotori, T.N. Takahashi
Okayama Univ. : K. Yoshimura
Korea Univ. : J.K. Ahn, S.H. Kim, W.S. Jung, S.W. Choi, B.M. Kang
OMEGA Ecole Polytechnique-CNRS/IN2P3 : S. Callier, C.d.L. Taille, L. Raux
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research : P. Evtoukhovitch, Z. Tsamalaidze
Contents
YN interaction and Sp scattering
Analysis status– S-p, S-p à Ln scatterings– S+p scattering
Summary
Strategy of hypernuclear physics
Nuclear physics
Known nuclear force
Unknown nuclear structure
Hypernuclear physics
Unknown YN interaction
Expect from hypernuclear structure
Theoretical frameworkextended to SUF(3) symmetry
Lattice QCD
Hyperon proton scattering
12C(p+, K+)12LC
PRC 64 044302 (2001)
g-ray spectroscopyPRL 87 212502 (2001)X hypernuclear spectroscopy
sd-shell L hypernuclei
10 times more LL hypernuclei
Hyperon proton scattering
Current status of YN scattering experiment
NN scattering data : quite accurate
YN scattering data : very poor statistics
np®np pp®pp Lp®Lp Lp®S0p
S+p®S+p S-p®S-p S-p®S0n S-p®Ln
Y. Kondo Doctor thesis
Comparison of BeamProton beam (1012~13 particle / pulse)
flight length : ~80 m
flight length : ~1.2 cm
Secondary beam (p, K) (107 particle / pulse)
Third beam (S, L)(~100 particle / pulse)even in E40 experiment
J-PARC E40 : Measurement of ds/dW of Sp scatterings Physics motivations
– Verification of repulsive force due to quark Pauli effect in the S+p channel– Systematic study of the SN interaction by separating isospin channel
Measurement of ds/dWAim to detect 10,000 events• S+p elastic scattering• S-p elastic scattering• S-p à Ln inelastic scattering
Pauli effect in quark level
S+p potential by Lattice QCD
H. Nemura et al.Few-Body Syst (2013) 54:1223-1226
Large repulsive core is expected in Lattice QCD
Large ds/dW is predicted in S+p channel
θcos-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
[mb/
sr]
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 550MeV/c NSC97f550 MeV/c FSSfss2ESC08Chiral EFT 550 MeV/cE289 data (0.35<p(GeV/c)<0.75)E251 data (0.3<p(GeV/c)<0.6)
p mode0πn mode+π
Cross section in simulation
p scattering at 0.5 < p (GeV/c) < 0.6)+Σ (Ω/dσd
CMqcos-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
(mb/
sr)
W/dsd
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
n scattering (0.45 < p(GeV/c) < 0.55)L ®p -SSimulationCross section in simulation500MeV/c NSC97f500 MeV/c fss2ESC08500 MeV/c chiral EFT
CMqcos-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
(mb/
sr)
W/dsd
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
p scattering at 0.55 < p(GeV/c) < 0.65)-S (W/dsdSimulationCross section in simulation600MeV/c NSC97fESC08600 MeV/c fss2600 MeV/c chiral EFTE289 data (0.4<p(GeV/c)<0.7)
Our goal
I=3/2S+p (0.5 < p (GeV/c) < 0.6)
S-p (0.55 < p (GeV/c) < 0.65) S-p → Ln (0.55 < p (GeV/c) < 0.65)
Theories– Quark Cluster model (FSS, fss2)
Y. Fujiwara et al., Prog. in Part. and Nucl. Phys. 58 (2007) 429, and private communication
– Nijmegen model (ESC08c) T. A. Rijken, Prog. of Theor. Phys. Suppl. 185
(2010) 14, and private communication– Chiral EFT (NLO)
J. Haidenbauer et al., Nucl. Phys. A 915 (2013) 24, and private communication
I=1/2
Quark Pauli effect
Constraint for Chiral EFT
Information of LN-SN coupling
Simulation
34
1k2 sin2 δ3S1 =
dσdΩ
(900 )− (higher waves)
Phase shift of quark Pauli channel
Experiments at J-PARC
Easier to check experimental feasibility
S- : Longer life timeNo decay channel to proton
S-n
p-
1st production run S-p scattering in June 2018 (~2 days)
2nd production runS-p scattering production run in 2019 Feb. – March (~20 days)
17 M S-S+p scattering production run in 2019 April (~13 days)
40 M S+
3rd production runS+p scattering production run in 2020 Feb. - March
2018
2019
2020Due to accelerator trouble, half of beam time was postponed.
BC3,4(MWDC)
BH2
BH1GC
BFT
π+
CATCH
KURAMAK+
E40 detector setup concept
S production– p±p→K+S±
1.3 GeV/c p- 1.4 GeV/c p+
S momentum range– 0.4 ~ 0.8 GeV/c
Beamline spectrometer• Momentum analysis of
p beam
KURAMA spectrometer• Identification of K+
• Momentum analysis
Momentum reconstructionof S beam
p+
Two successive two-body reactions
p+ K+
p
n (missing)
CATCH systemCylindrical Fiber Tracker
BGO calorimeter
p+
Detection of Sp scattering eventby CATCH detector
J-PARC K1.8 beamline
S Identificationp+
K+
p
Mass2 (GeV2)
BC3,4(MWDC)
BH2
BH1GC
BFT
π+
CATCH
KURAMAK+ Analysis of forward
spectrometer
Analysis of beamline spectrometer S-
Missing mass (GeV)
Missing mass (p-pàK+X)
Mass square distribution of outgoing particle
S beam momentum distribution
S- beam momentum distribution S+ beam momentum distribution
GeV/c GeV/c
S- yield : ~17 M (Our goal 18M)ct = 4.4 cm
S+ yield : ~40 M (Our goal 80M)ct = 2.4 cm
Derive differential cross section for three momentum ranges to understand beam momentum dependence
Sp scattering detector (CATCH)– Compact setup to satisfy both K+ acceptance and Sp scattering acceptance– Fast response detector to reject accidental coincidence events
p+400 mm
49 mm35 mm
100 mm
pK+
S
p
p n
pS
Ep
q
Cylindrical Fiber Tracker + BGO calorimeter configuration
CFT
BGO
BGO E (MeV)
CFTD
E (M
eV)
CATCH Particle ID w/ S- event
Proton with S- event !
S- : No major decay mode to proton
Sign for some reaction
Missing mass
Missing mass (GeV/c2)
S-
Proton event in S- production
a
Proton event in S- production
anp scattering
p-p scattering
DEnp (MeV) Dpp-p (MeV)
DE = Emeasured – Ecalculated (q)
Proton event in S- production
anp scattering
p-p scattering
DEnp (MeV) Dpp-p (MeV)
S-p scattering
~4500 event
DES-p (MeV)
preliminary
S-p à Ln
~2400 event
DpS-p->Ln (MeV)
preliminary
DE = Emeasured – Ecalculated (q)
Angular dependence
a
CMθcos-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
(mb/
sr)
Ω/d
σd
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
p scattering at 0.55 < p(GeV/c) < 0.65)-Σ (Ω/dσd
600MeV/c NSC97f
ESC08
600 MeV/c fss2
600 MeV/c chiral EFT
CMθcos-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
(mb/
sr)
Ω/d
σd
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
n scattering (0.45 < p(GeV/c) < 0.55)Λ →p -Σ
500MeV/c NSC97f
500 MeV/c fss2
ESC08
500 MeV/c chiral EFT
out o
f acc
epta
nce
Before acceptance and efficiency correction
DE S
-p(M
eV)
cosqCM
preliminary preliminary
Dp S
-p->L
n(M
eV)
cosqCM
Forward peak structure Rather flat structure
Angular dependence
a
CMθcos-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
(mb/
sr)
Ω/d
σd
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
p scattering at 0.55 < p(GeV/c) < 0.65)-Σ (Ω/dσd
600MeV/c NSC97f
ESC08
600 MeV/c fss2
600 MeV/c chiral EFT
CMθcos-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
(mb/
sr)
Ω/d
σd
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
n scattering (0.45 < p(GeV/c) < 0.55)Λ →p -Σ
500MeV/c NSC97f
500 MeV/c fss2
ESC08
500 MeV/c chiral EFT
out o
f acc
epta
nce
Before acceptance and efficiency correction
DE S
-p(M
eV)
cosqCM
preliminary preliminary
Dp S
-p->L
n(M
eV)
cosqCM
Forward peak structure Rather flat structure
We could collect enough data to study the angular dependence with good accuracy.We will also check the S- beam momentum dependence.
S+p analysis
Experimental difficulty– Many protons from S+àpp0 decay– Much shorter flight length (~ 1.2 cm )
S+ à p + p0 decay event
p0
MM2 (GeV2)Start from 2 proton final event
S+ decay make a large background in S+p scattering for S+àp+n decay mode
Two proton event in S+ productionS+p scattering pp scattering from S+ decay
pp opening angle
Dp (pp scattering)
pp scattering
q pp
(deg
)
Kinematical check of pp scattering
Dp (GeV/c)
Clear identification of pp scattering
Detectors work well
S+p scattering
~40 M S+ beam
S+p scattering event ~2500
DE (MeV)
θcos-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
[mb/
sr]
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10550MeV/c NSC97f
550 MeV/c FSS
fss2
ESC08
Chiral EFT 550 MeV/c
p scattering at 0.5 < p (GeV/c) < 0.6)+Σ (Ω/dσd
S+p scattering
Before acceptance and efficiency correction
out o
f acc
epta
nce
cosqCM
DE S
+p(M
eV)
preliminary
Summary YN interaction from Yp scattering
– We have to establish this new direction
S yield summary
– S-p : 17M (94%)
– S+p : 40M (50%)
Analysis is on going
– Every scattering reaction is confirmed well Background reactions
Sp scattering reactions
– We can provide sufficient data to discuss the angular distribution of C.S.
– We could establish the modern Yp scattering experimental technique.
Future prospects– Derivation of ds/dW– U/D asymmetry of proton from hyperon decay for spin observable measurement
23