Hist 7510 Fall 2006

  • Upload
    awhit3

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 Hist 7510 Fall 2006

    1/13

    MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY

    THE ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC HISTORY:

    NEW THOUGHTS, NEW IDEAS & NEW PRACTICES

    PAPER PRESENTED TO

    DR. REBECCA CONARD

    IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF

    THE REQUIREMENTS FOR

    HISTORY 6510/7510: SEMINAR IN PUBLIC HISTORY

    DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY

    BY

    ALBERT C. WHITTENBERG

    MURFREESBORO, TN

    OCTOBER 3, 2006

  • 8/7/2019 Hist 7510 Fall 2006

    2/13

    Whittenberg 2

    Famed frontier historian, Fredrick Jackson Turner, once wrote that wherever

    there remains a chipped flint, a spearhead, a piece of pottery, a pyramid, a picture, a

    poem, a coliseum, or a coin, there is history.1

    Taken from the 1890s, this statement

    showed a fundamental change in the way history was being viewed. Before men like

    Turner, history was the written word found in letters, manuscripts, parchments or even

    carved in stone. History was the subject of academics and not the common man. The

    concept of public history would have its foundation established in the 1800s and early

    1900s by historians with these new viewpoints such as Turner, James Harvey Robinson,

    Carl L. Becker and Lucy M. Salmon. Building upon the ideas of these four and others, a

    number of institutions and groups grew and contributed to the building of this new

    movement. Finally, the very relationship between academic historians and the new

    public historians altered and changed therefore creating a new field and new historians

    that were a reflection of the events happening around them.

    The study of history and the meaning of just the word history have changed

    significantly over the past hundred years. James Harvey Robinson argued in 1912 that

    historians had been focused too much on matters of the state and conflict. He argued that

    we are taught to view mankind as in a periodic state of turmoil.2 His New History

    theory was to break free from this old mold and focus on such things as the scientific

    breakthroughs happening around us. Robinson believed that these were changing

    mankinds history far more than wars. Carl Beckerbuilt on this by stating that history is

    1Frederick Jackson Turner, The Significance of History in Ray Allen Billington, Frontier andSection: Selected Essays of Frederick Jackson Turner(Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.,

    1961), 19.

    2 James Harvey Robinson, The New History: Essays Illustrating Modern Historical Outlook(New

    York: The Macmillan Company, 1912), 12.

  • 8/7/2019 Hist 7510 Fall 2006

    3/13

    Whittenberg 3

    really the memory of things said and done and every person must have some

    knowledge of history.3

    Revolutionary educator, Lucy Maynard Salmon, seemed to

    mirror Beckers thoughts (although she did it a number of years before he wrote his

    article) by using her own backyard as a teaching tool for history. She looked outside and

    remarked who made the first fence, and who gave him the right to make the fence?4

    She also encouraged people to look at their towns street to find history. These four

    found history in the little things that affect all of us and could be relevant to the most

    unlearned person.

    Corresponding with these new thoughts on history or perhaps because of them,

    there was a rise in a number of individuals, groups and institutions working towards

    bringing history to the average public. Several of these individuals were more

    entrepreneur and collectors than traditional academic historians. Book publisher and

    printer, Hubert Howe Bancroft, turned to history almost as a hobby after his fortunes had

    been made in his late thirties. He started collecting items from California and eventually

    spread to the entire western part of North America. He hired assistants and eventually

    comprised thirty-nine volumes of research. Bancroft marketed his works through

    subscriptions (and self-publishing), which netted him a profit of a half a million dollars

    and guaranteed the set would not go out of print.5

    Another such promoter was Lyman

    Copeland Draper who had a mission, as written by Larry Gara, to rescue from oblivion

    the forgotten heroes of the border wars and early settlements by traveling an estimated

    3Carl L. Becker, Everyman His Own Historian, American Historical Review 37(1932), 223.

    4 Lucy Maynard Salmon, History and the Texture of Modern Life: Selected Essays (Philadelphia:

    University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001), 79.

    5 John Walton Caughey, Hubert Howe Bancroft, Historian of Western America, The American

    Historical Review 50 (April 1945), 464-465.

  • 8/7/2019 Hist 7510 Fall 2006

    4/13

    Whittenberg 4

    46,000 miles collecting documents.6

    He eventually moved to Wisconsin and helped

    establish the State Historical Society of Wisconsin and became a champion for the state

    capital of Madison. When Draper died, his collection went entirely to the historical

    society which would arrange and sort his papers to eventually total 478 bound volumes

    making the society one of the nations outstanding research centers for western

    history.7

    The collections of these men were dedicated to finding anything and

    everything regarding their subject of interest which, again, is building upon that concept

    of history in the little things for everyone.

    Like Draper in Wisconsin, the 1800s and early 1900s was a period of creating

    historical societies. From her book, American Historical Societies 1790-1860, Leslie W.

    Dunlap wrote that the initial need was apparent as the establishment of the first sixty-

    five historical societies in the United States was the realization that action was necessary

    to preserve historical records.8

    Some of the societies were created by charters from

    states but most originated in a group of people with a common interest would meet and

    decided to form a society. After organizing, they would then petition the state legislature

    for some sort of formal recognition. While some societies were located in state capitals,

    others would be areas of large populations or towns with universities. In one

    extraordinary example, Dr. Benjamin Franklin Shambaugh, a full-time professor of the

    University of Iowa and a member of the Board of Curators for the State Historical

    6Larry Gara, Lyman Copeland Draper in Clifford L. Lord, ed., Keepers of the Past(Chapel

    Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1965), 42.

    7 Ibid., 51.

    8 Leslie W. Dunlap, American Historical Societies: 1790-1860 (Philadelphia: Porcupine Press,1974), 10.

  • 8/7/2019 Hist 7510 Fall 2006

    5/13

    Whittenberg 5

    Society of Iowa, moved the location of the society from an old room above a hardware

    store to the university. Shambaugh could literally step out of his faculty office and go

    across the hall to the SHSI office.9 Like Drapers goals for Wisconsin, Shambaugh stated

    I dream of the day when Iowa history not only will be translated into folklore but

    transmitted into the hearts of our people.10

    These societies were moving history away

    from the traditional focus on conflict as Robinson has stated. What started out as merely

    official documents in most of these societies, Dunlap explained had grown into

    traditions, legends, anecdotes of persons and places, letters, pictures, maps, songs and

    ballads.

    11

    The growth of historical societies also showed a growth in non-professional and

    non-academic amateurs taking an active role in what we would likely label today

    public history. A number of these amateur groups were comprised of predominantly

    women. For example, the Mount Vernon Ladies Association was formed in 1853 to

    preserve George Washingtons plantation. This was the first of its type in the United

    States and historian James M. Lindgren credits the organization with beginning the

    modern preservation movement.12

    While he believed that these groups were doing this

    for more romantic reasons than professional, several structures like Mount Vernon would

    probably not have survived to today without their help. It is also important to note that

    9 Rebecca Conard, Benjamin Shambaugh and the Intellectual Foundations of Public History (IowaCity: University of Iowa Press, 2002), 48.

    10 Ibid., 47.

    11 Dunlap, 20.

    12James M. Lindgren, A New Departure in Historic, Patriotic Work: Personalism,

    Professionalism, and Conflicting Concepts of Material Culture in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth

    Centuries, The Public Historian 18 (Spring 1996), 43.

  • 8/7/2019 Hist 7510 Fall 2006

    6/13

    Whittenberg 6

    several of these amateurs were African American women, who were striving to promote

    not only their sex but race. They also formed societies along with libraries and reading

    rooms. African American men were invited as well with several volumes being written

    by both men and women to highlight the African American soldiers, patriots and heroes

    of the various wars from the American Revolution to the twentieth century.13

    Professor

    of Black Studies at Wellesley College, Tony Martin, called some of the people in these

    groups bibliophiles that collected and cataloged works by African Americans to counter

    the pseudo-scientific racism that was so prevalent during this time when so-called

    scholars and writers were claiming that black people were by nature inferior.

    14

    Without

    their work, the secondary goal of providing a body of information for posterity would

    surely have never happened.15

    Also, amateurs (both white and black) focused on the

    womens movements and the plight of women in general. This was in contrast to the

    normal fascination with politics as Bonnie G. Smith wrote that professional historians

    during the turn of the century did not study poor or ordinary people since they did not

    study women.16 If public history is for everyone, these amateurs were creating books

    and other resources that all could enjoy and learn from.

    Along with historical societies, another trend in the field of public history was

    emerging at a rapid pace. Increasingly, states were seeing the need for archives.

    13Julie Des Jardins, African American Womens Historical Consciousness in Women and theHistorical Enterprise in America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003), 120-121.

    14Tony Martin, Bibliophiles, Activists, and Race Men in Sinnette, Coates, and Battle, eds.,

    Black Bibliophiles and Collectors: Preservers of Black History (Washington, D. C.: Howard University

    Press, 1990), 29.

    15 Ibid., 30.

    16Bonnie G. Smith, High Amateurism and the Panoramic Past in The Gender of History

    (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998), 174.

  • 8/7/2019 Hist 7510 Fall 2006

    7/13

    Whittenberg 7

    According to archivist and author Patricia Galloway, most early archives were

    motivated by a filiopietistic desire to preserve evidence, but all faced the possibilities

    of being influenced by various political interests.17

    For example, the Mississippi

    Department of Archives and History (established in 1902) and its first director, Dunbar

    Rowland, could be argued to have primarily been a promoter of the Lost Cause of the

    failed Confederacy instead of covering every possibility of Mississippi history. Galloway

    would also write that neither Rowland nor the institution had much choice with a Board

    of Trustees where two were Confederate veterans, three the sons of veterans, one a

    legislative participant in the overthrow of Reconstruction and two present at the 1890

    Constitutional Convention.18

    Another example is the state of Illinois had let the

    secretary of the state office keep legal records till a need was perceived for an archives

    division (where it would be part of the Illinois State Library till 1957). Margaret Cross

    Norton would become the first archivist of Illinois in 1922 and serve there for over thirty-

    five years. In a field dominated by men, Norton would become a charter member of the

    Society of American Archivists (serving as its first vice-president and fourth president),

    secretary-treasurer of the National Association of State Libraries and also be the editor

    for the American Archivistin 1946.19

    Unlike Rowland, the Illinois archives were

    perceived as a place by political agencies to store all important documents (no matter the

    subject) along with documents perceived as being too recent to be viewed by the public.

    17Patricia Galloway, Archives, Power and History: Dunbar Rowland and the Beginning of the

    State Archives of Mississippi (1902-1936), American Archivist 69 (2006), 82.

    18 Ibid., 94.

    19 Thorton W. Mitchell, Norton on Archives: The Writings of Margaret Cross Norton on Archival& Records Management(Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1975), xvi.

  • 8/7/2019 Hist 7510 Fall 2006

    8/13

    Whittenberg 8

    One wonders then if Norton had the same problem as the Library of Congress in 1993

    when they released Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshalls papers to the public

    shortly after his death prompting many to examine the other judges decisions on current

    issues like abortion.20

    In these earlier times, archivists had perhaps more power in the

    releasing of documents and furthering their own causes.

    Along with historical societies, amateur groups and archives, another aspect that

    was slower to change its perspective from the scholarly to the common public was

    museums. Historian and author Marjorie Schwarzer wrote that museums of the late

    1800s were places for the elite and privileged and managed by a socially prominent

    patrician class.21

    She described museums as mainly cabinet of curiosities where

    collectors would show everything they owned.22

    It would take revolutionary thinkers like

    John Dewey and his wife as they took school children to museums as part of their

    educational curriculum. Even though the Deweys were doing this in 1896, it would be

    many more years before most museums would change their attitudes about the common

    man attending. Most structures were just too imposing in appearance as well as the

    smallest admission fee usually out of reach for most Americans. Most were also off

    limits to African Americans or only available to then one day a week.23

    Lagging behind

    the other public history institutions, it would take the twentieth century for museums to

    grow from a mere 1,400 in 1928 to over 10,000 in 1998 with an estimated 865 annual

    20Randall C. Jimerson, Ethical Concerns for Archivists, The Public Historian 28 (2006), 87.

    21 Marjorie Schwarzer, Riches, Rivals and Radicals: 100 Years of Museums in America (American

    Association of Museums, 2006), 3.

    22 Ibid., 7.

    23 Ibid., 10.

  • 8/7/2019 Hist 7510 Fall 2006

    9/13

    Whittenberg 9

    attendance.24

    This was done by creating structures, displays and shows not only less

    imposing to the general public but marketed especially for them.

    With the rise of these new public history ventures, the relationship of the

    traditional academic historian would begin to evolve. For example, academics struggled

    with the ideas of an entrepreneur like New England historian J. Franklin Jameson for

    suggesting joining scholarly work with business patrons in a speech in 1987 to the

    American Historical Association.25

    This is certainly not as true in our modern era where

    a former university historian, Shelley Bookspan, started her own video company based on

    creating an oral history for individuals, companies or other groups.

    26

    Another example is

    the Old Independence Regional Museum that worked closely with private donors, the

    local community and even a specific family to develop a traveling exhibit of mainly

    community photographs that would have surely been looked down upon by academics of

    the past.27

    Where traditionally academics have rejected advances in technology, public

    historians have been more open. In the case of radio, author Ian Tyrell wrote that the

    State Historical Society of Iowa gave a series of radio talks in connection with Iowa

    History Week in 1928. In Minnesota, more than twenty talks were given in 1927-28,

    with the result that family papers and diaries were turned over to the Minnesota State

    24 Ibid., 6.

    25Morey D. Rothberg, The Brahmin as Bureaucrat: J. Franklin Jameson at the Carnegie

    Institution of Washington, 1905-1928, The Public Historian 8 (1986), 50.

    26Shelley Bookspan, Something Ventured, Many Things Gained: Reflections on Being a

    Historian Entrepreneur, The Public Historian 28 (2006), 70.

    27Jo Blatti, Harry Millers Vision of Arkansas, 1900-1910: A Case Study in Sponsored Projects,

    The Public Historian 28 (2006), 82.

  • 8/7/2019 Hist 7510 Fall 2006

    10/13

    Whittenberg 10

    Historical Society.28

    This conflict continues in recent years such as the case of Dr.

    Russell Lewis who created quite a controversy for suggesting DNA analysis of Mary

    Todd Lincoln's cloak to see if it was truly stained with blood from the President's

    assassination.29

    Change is slow, but academia becomes more and more open each year to

    the possibilities.

    The modern era has seen public history truly become a field of its own. Using the

    notions set forth by past innovators like Turner and Becker, public historians like

    Katharine T. Corbett and Howard S. Miller would write every person used history every

    day to make sense of the world and the burden of engagement lay with the

    professionals.30

    With the rise of historical societies, archives, museums and a host of

    dedicated people (both amateur and professional), the possibilities of engaging all of

    society continues to grow. Public history is taught as a completely separate major in

    several institutions. In an article forThe Public Historian, Noel J. Stowe explained that

    public history programs introduce students to different models of practice through

    courses and projects and prepare students in the high-order practice of the discipline.31

    According to Stowe, it is a reflective practice. However, it can also be controversial and

    conflict with government as Canada Science and Technology Museum historian Sharon

    Babian lamented overa Parks Canada historian researching the Northwest Rebellion or

    28 Ian Tyrrell, Historians in Public: The Practice of American History, 1890-1970 (Chicago: TheUniversity of Chicago Press, 2005), 91.

    29Russell Lewis, Judgments of Value, Judgments of Fact: The Ethical Dimension of

    Biohistorical Research, The Public Historian 28 (2006), 96.

    30Katharine T. Corbett and Howard S. Miller, A Shared Inquiry into Shared Inquiry, The PublicHistorian 28 (2006), 18.

    31Noel J. Stowe, Public History Curriculum: Illustrating Reflective Practice, The Public

    Historian 28 (2006), 40.

  • 8/7/2019 Hist 7510 Fall 2006

    11/13

    Whittenberg 11

    the Acadian Expulsions.32

    It can be used in private consulting like the Historical

    Research Associates firm that studied over twenty highways and roads that crossed

    national forests in Wyoming and Idaho.33

    Public history can even be used for litigation in

    cases like the thirty lawsuits historian Craig E. Colten was asked to participate in

    involving, in his own words, a historical perspective on industrial waste-management

    practices and capabilities.34

    These examples and countless others show not only the

    evolution of public history but how much it is now involved with modern society. Public

    history is for the public and about the public. It is for all.

    32Sharon Babaian, So Far, So Good: Ethics and the Government Historian, The PublicHistorian 28 (2006), 103.

    33 Alan S. Newwell, Personal and Professional Issues in Private Consulting, The Public

    Historian 28 (2006), 108.

    34Craig E. Colten, The Historians Responsibility in Litigation Support, The Public Historian28 (2006), 111.

  • 8/7/2019 Hist 7510 Fall 2006

    12/13

    Whittenberg 12

    Bibliography

    Becker, Carl L. Everyman His Own Historian. American Historical Review 37(1932),

    221-236.

    Caughey, John Walton. Hubert Howe Bancroft, Historian of Western America. TheAmerican Historical Review 50 (April 1945), 461-470.

    Conard, Rebecca. Benjamin Shambaugh and the Intellectual Foundations of PublicHistory. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 2002.

    Des Jardins, Julie. African American Womens Historical Consciousness in Womenand the Historical Enterprise in America. Chapel Hill: University of North

    Carolina Press, 2003, 118-142.

    Dunlap, Leslie W. American Historical Societies: 1790-1860. Philadelphia: Porcupine

    Press, 1974.

    Galloway, Patricia. Archives, Power and History: Dunbar Rowland and the Beginning

    of the State Archives of Mississippi (1902-1936). American Archivist 69 (2006),

    79-116.

    Gara, Larry. Lyman Copeland Draper in Clifford L. Lord, ed. Keepers of the Past.

    Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1965, 40-52.

    Lindgren, James M. A New Departure in Historic, Patriotic Work: Personalism,

    Professionalism, and Conflicting Concepts of Material Culture in the Late

    Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. The Public Historian 18 (Spring1996), 41-60.

    Martin, Tony. Bibliophiles, Activists, and Race Men in Sinnette, Coates, and Battle,eds., Black Bibliophiles and Collectors: Preservers of Black History.

    Washington, D. C.: Howard University Press, 1990, 23-34.

    Mitchell, Thorton W. Norton on Archives: The Writings of Margaret Cross Norton on

    Archival & Records Management. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press,

    1975.

    Robinson, James Harvey. The New History in The New History: Essays Illustrating the

    Modern Historical Outlook. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1912.

    Rothberg, Morey D. The Brahmin as Bureaucrat: J. Franklin Jameson at the CarnegieInstitution of Washington, 1905-1928. The Public Historian 8 (1986), 47-60.

    Salmon, Lucy Maynard. History and the Texture of Modern Life: Selected Essays.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001.

  • 8/7/2019 Hist 7510 Fall 2006

    13/13