Historic Preservation Commission

PUBLIC NOTICE

In accordance with the Statues of the State of Illinois and Ordinances of the City of Highland Park, a

Regular Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Highland Park will be held at the

hour of 7:30 PM on Thursday, June 10, 2021 at Virtual Meeting & City Hall Optional, 1707 St. Johns

Avenue, Highland Park, IL, during which meeting there will be a discussion of the following:

City of Highland Park

Historic Preservation Commission Thursday, June 10, 2021

Highland Park Virtual Meeting & City Hall Optional, 1707 St. Johns Avenue 7:30 PM

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

I. Call to Order

II. Roll Call

III. Approval of Minutes

1. Minutes From the Regular Meeting on May 13, 2021

IV. Scheduled Business

1. 1533 Sheridan Road - Demolition Review

V. Discussion Items

VI. Business From the Public

VII. Other Business

VIII. Staff Report

IX. Adjournment

Historic Preservation Commission Minutes May 13, 2021 - Page 1

MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING 1

VIA REMOTE & ON-SITE ACCESS 2

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 3

OF THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS 4

5

6

MEETING DATE: Thursday, May 13, 2021 7

8

MEETING LOCATION: Highland Park Virtual Meeting & Pre-Session Conference Room, City Hall, 9

1707 St. Johns Avenue, Highland Park, IL 10

11

CALL TO ORDER 12

At 7:32 p.m., Chairwoman Salamasick called the meeting to order. She read the agenda, information that 13

the City of Highland Park continues to follow social distancing requirements and Governor Pritzker’s 14

Executive Order 2020-07, and meeting procedures. This Commission meeting takes place virtually through 15

audioconference or video call and at City Hall for some Staff and residents. Staff was asked to call the roll. 16

17

ROLL CALL 18

Commissioners Remotely: Chairwoman Salamasick; Commissioners Levy, Pierce, Reinstein, & Sogin 19

20

Commissioner Absent: Pines 21

22

Councilwoman Present: Stone 23

24

Student Council Absent: Beck, Betancourt & Zhang 25

26

Staff declared that a quorum was present. 27

28

Staff: Cross, Coleman 29

30

Guest Remotely: Seth Fisher/Applicant 31

32

Others Remotely: Cerabona 33

34

APPROVAL OF MINUTES 35

Commissioner Levy moved to approve the regular minutes of April 8, 2021, as presented. Commissioner 36

Pierce seconded the motion. 37

38

On a roll call vote 39

Voting Yea Chairwoman Salamasick; Commissioners Levy, Pierce, Reinstein, & Sogin 40

Voting Nay: None 41

42

Chairwoman Salamasick declared that the motion passed unanimously. 43

44

SCHEDULED BUSINESS 45

1. Certificate of Appropriateness – 2176 Sheridan Road 46

Planner Coleman reviewed the plan: 47

Property location is at Sheridan and Vine down the street from Highland Park High School 48

3.1.a

Packet Pg. 2

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

1 -

04 H

PC

5-1

3-21

DR

AF

T (

Min

ute

s fr

om

May

13,

202

1)


Lasher house 1

Gained Local Landmark in 2007 2

Built c. 1885 as Queen Anne Style; remodeled into Tudor Revival in 1920 3

Project architect is Guy Scopelitti, Guy Scopelitti Landscape, Inc. 4

Project summary was provided 5

o front stoop is being replaced; brick has been deteriorating; retaining existing footprint 6

and height 7

Materials are: 8

o brick, bluestone (newest material), and a wrought-iron railing 9

Renderings were shown 10

Minimal impact on streetscape; stair covered by landscaping 11

COA standards were referenced 12

Staff recommends approval 13

14

Applicant Seth Fisher added they are trying to fix this for the long-term. 15

16

Some HPC comments are: 17

Commissioner Levy asked if the bluestone material is new and what it’s replacing. Mr. Fisher 18

replied – the red brick stairs. 19

Chairwoman Salamasick said the red brick must get slippery. Mr. Fisher concurred. 20

21

Commissioner Levy moved that the replacement of the stairs satisfies the criteria for the COA as proposed. 22

Commissioner Sogin seconded the motion. 23

24



Voting Nay: None 27

28


30

DISCUSSION ITEMS 31

1. Historic Preservation Plan 32

Senior Planner Cross advised the Historic Preservation Plan will be presented shortly. Staff will review 33

same with the HPC at the June meeting. Then recommendations will be submitted to City Council. 34

35

2. Historical Significance? 36

Commissioner Sogin stated she had questions about how the Commission interprets Landmark Criteria 3 37

and 5 relating to people and evaluating how they impacted the City, County state or country. 38

39

Chairwoman Salamasick stated a delay cannot be imposed on only one criteria. 40

41

Commissioner Sogin noted, from the architecture side, we have an opinion. 42

43

Senior Planner Cross read #5 of landmark criteria standards. The commission noted criterion 3 was also 44

relevant. Councilwoman Stone wonders where 45

this criteria came from and if it is in other ordinances. 46

47

3.1.a

Packet Pg. 3

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

1 -

04 H

PC

5-1

3-21

DR

AF

T (

Min

ute

s fr

om

May

13,

202

1)


Commissioner Reinstein noted it is a famous person (period). 1

2

Councilwoman Stone asked that this be an agenda point for more conversation. 3

4

Commissioner Sogin said, if this criteria is used, the vote should be postponed so that more information 5

may be requested. There are a lot of nuances. She doesn’t have a conclusion but just wanted to raise 6

the issue. 7

8

3. Yard Signs 9

Councilwoman Stone shared she drove through Lake Forest and noticed there are yard signs denoting 10

homes that won a local landmark or preservation award. She wonders if Highland Park could do the 11

same. Senior Planner Cross shed more light. 12

13

Chairwoman Salamasick suggested a mailer be sent to residents inquiring who may want signs. 14

15

BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC 16

There is no Business from the Public, no attendees at City Hall, nor on Zoom. 17

18

OTHER BUSINESS 19

1. Next Regular Meeting 20

The next regular meeting is scheduled for June 10, 2021. 21

22

STAFF REPORT 23

There is no Staff Report. 24

25

Commissioner Levy asked if the HPC vacancy is being sought. Senior Planner Cross said this is underway in 26

the City Manager’s office. 27

28

Councilwoman Stone advised that City Council Liaisons may be shifting. 29

30

ADJOURNMENT 31

Commissioner Levy moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:05 p.m. Commissioner Reinstein seconded the 32

motion. 33

34



Voting Nay: None 37

38


40

Respectfully Submitted, 41

42

Gale Cerabona 43

Minute Taker 44

3.1.a

Packet Pg. 4

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

1 -

04 H

PC

5-1

3-21

DR

AF

T (

Min

ute

s fr

om

May

13,

202

1)

Page 1 of 3

SUMMARY OF THE PETITION

The owner of 1533 Sheridan Road is proposing to demolish the single-family dwelling. The owner is identified

as 1533 Sheridan Rd., LLC. The limited liability company is operated in part by the petitioner, Mr. Ron Abrams.

ARCHITECTURAL ANALYSIS

1533 Sheridan Rd is identified as a Colonial Revival style house in the property’s architectural survey

(Attachment 1). The attached 2020 Central East Survey, Colonial Revivals were the most popular Architectural

Styles among all significant and contributing buildings in the survey area (Attachment 2). 79 Colonial Revival

homes are present in this Central East area of Highland Park; the second closest architectural style in the area

is Contemporary with 57 houses. A total of 458 homes were surveyed against 40 different architectural styles

in the entire area.

To: Historic Preservation Commission

From: Zubin Coleman, Planner II

Date: June 10, 2021

Subject: Determination of Historic Significance – 1533 Sheridan Road

Location: 1533 Sheridan Road

Petitioner: Ron Abrams 1533 Sheridan, LLC 5773 N Lincoln Avenue, Chicago, IL 60659

Historical Name: Unknown

Historical Status: C – Contributing (1999 Central East Survey)

Year Built: C.1920-1929, approx. 1925

Style: Colonial Revival

Architect: Unknown

Original Owner: Unknown

Alterations: Unknown

Staff Opinion: Staff recommends that the Commission discuss the structure with regard to landmark criteria #4 related to the building’s Colonial Revival architectural style that is synonymous with other historic properties in Highland Park

4.1.a

Packet Pg. 5

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

AA

153

3 S

her

idan

Rd

Dem

o S

taff

Rep

ort

(15

33 S

her

idan

Ro

ad -

Dem

olit

ion

Rev

iew

)

Page 2 of 3

As seen in Figure 1, this classic Colonial Revival

home has a masonry brick exterior and is built on

a poured concrete foundation. Additional existing

condition pictures can be seen in Attachment 3.

The attached pictures illustrate some of the

dwelling’s original features such as the wood 6/1

double hung Other common Colonial Revival

features that can be seen on the hous,e including

its gabled roof. The roof shingles are the only

feature the architectural survey identifies as a

replacement. (Attachment 1).

Pages 70 & 71 of the 2020 Central East

architectural resource survey outline the style’s

history and characteristics. The section also explains why this style was a popular choice for new constructions

due to its simplicity and patriotic associations with early American 18th-century homes. Half of the Colonial

Revivals in the Central East area (including 1533 Sheridan Rd) were built between 1920 & 1940 (Attachment

2).

The house at 1533 Sheridan Road is identified as C – Contributing. This is likely due in part to the lack of

detailed historical information available for the house.

ORIGINAL ARCHITECT

After exhausting the City’s research resources, staff was unable to find the original architect for 1533 Sheridan

Rd.

BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION

Staff is unable to find the original owner of 1533 Sheridan Rd. However, staff identified two previous tenants

who lived in the residence. Most recently, the property was owned by Robert & Margaret Altman. As seen in

their obituaries (Attachment 4), Robert, an air-conditioning company owner, and Margaret, an Osco Pharmacy

technician were married for 59 years. Robert passed away in 1990 while Margaret passed away in 2011. It is

unknown how long the couple lived there. The applicant has indicated the house has been vacant since

Margaret’s passing.

The other known past tenants were Myron and Marion Bernstein. Dr. Myron Bernstein was the founder of the

Glencoe Animal Hospital and was recognized in his field as having served as former executive director of the

American College of Veterinary Radiology and served on other veterinary medical boards (Attachment 5). In

an issue of the Highland Park Local Newspaper dated May 5th, 1951 (Attachment 6), the paper welcomed “Dr.

and Mrs. Myron Bernstein of 1533 Sheridan Road” as new Highland Parkers.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Based on the available information, Staff recommends the Commission review the property at 1533 Sheridan

Road with regard to Criteria #4 due to the popular Colonial Revival architectural style that’s seen throughout

the area. Colonial Revival style homes are a constant in the community - this can be confirmed by the recorded

Figure 1. Existing condition photo of north façade of

house

4.1.a

Packet Pg. 6

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

AA

153

3 S

her

idan

Rd

Dem

o S

taff

Rep

ort

(15

33 S

her

idan

Ro

ad -

Dem

olit

ion

Rev

iew

)

Page 3 of 3

number of Colonial Revival homes in the Central East area referenced earlier from Attachment 2. If the

Commission feels that more historic research may help in a determination of architectural or historical

significance for this house, staff recommends a continuation to the next HPC agenda.

Alternatively, if the Commission feels the information provided above is sufficient, a determination can be

made on what, if any, landmark criteria in Chapter 24 are satisfied by the subject property.

In accordance with Section 170.122 Demolition of Dwellings (E)(1) Historic Preservation Commission Review,

the Commission is asked to review the structure per Section 24.015 of the Historic Preservation Regulations.

If the Historic Preservation Commission determines that the Structure that is the subject of the Demolition

Application satisfies:

(1) Four or more of the landmark standards, and has sufficient integrity of location, design, materials, and workmanship to make it worthy of preservation or rehabilitation, then the commission shall impose a 365-day demolition delay period on such structure, commencing on the Application Completion date;

(2) two or three of the landmark standards, and has sufficient integrity of location, design, materials, and workmanship to make it worthy of preservation or rehabilitation, then the commission shall impose a 180-day demolition delay period on such structure, commencing on the Application Completion date;

(3) one or none of the landmark standards, or does not have sufficient integrity of location, design, materials, or workmanship to make it worthy of preservation or rehabilitation, then the City shall proceed immediately to process the application pursuant to all other applicable provisions of this Code.

LANDMARK CRITERIA

Below are the landmark criteria and definition of “integrity” from the City Code (Section 24.015):

(1) It demonstrates character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the City, county, state, or country.

(2) It is the site of a significant local, county, state, or national event. (3) It is associated with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the City,

County, State, or Country. (4) It embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural and/or landscape style valuable for the

study of a specific time period, type, method of construction, or use of indigenous materials. (5) It is identifiable as the work of a notable builder, designer, architect, artist, or landscape architect whose

individual work has influenced the development of the City, County, State, or Country. (6) It embodies, overall, elements of design, details, materials, and/or craftsmanship that renders it

architecturally, visually, aesthetically, and/or culturally significant and/or innovative. (7) It has a unique location or it possesses or exhibits singular physical and/or aesthetic characteristics that

make it an established or familiar visual feature. (8) It is a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian structure or group of such structures, including,

but not limited to farmhouses, gas stations or other commercial structures, with a high level of integrity and/or architectural, cultural, historical, and/or community significance.

(9) It possesses or exhibits significant historical and/or archaeological qualities.

Integrity: The degree of original design and historic material remaining in place on a property, structure, area,

object, or landscape of significance.

4.1.a

Packet Pg. 7

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

AA

153

3 S

her

idan

Rd

Dem

o S

taff

Rep

ort

(15

33 S

her

idan

Ro

ad -

Dem

olit

ion

Rev

iew

)

Lat/Long: 42.1804009610888900, -87.7935819521495700 [WGS84]

UTM: Zone 16T, 434463.1803 mE, 4670111.0171 mN

Parcel No.

Resource Address:1533 Sheridan Rd Highland Park Illinois 60035 United StatesCounty: Lake

Historic name:

Present name:

Local place name:

Visible from public right of way: Yes

Ownership:

Owner/Address:

Land unit size:

Site/Setting: Wooded lot overlooking ravine; foundation plantings; side driveway.

Historical InformationHistoric Function: Domestic: Single Dwelling Current Function: Domestic: Single Dwelling

Construction Date: ca. 1920-1929 , approximate 1925* Architect:

Original or Significant Owners: Builder:

Significant Date/Period: Developer:

Areas of Significance:

Architectural InformationCategory: building, Single-family residence Style: Colonial Revival Additions

Alterations Moved Other

Ancillary structures:1 total including single-baygarage

Structural: masonry Exterior Material(s): original brick

Stories: 2, Bays: Roof Material: replacement asphalt shingles

Form or Plan: , rectangular Roof Type: Gabled

Foundation: poured concrete Windows: original wood 6/1 double-hung sashes

General condition: Fair Chimney(s): one brick side left exterior

Basement: Porch: single-story Partial-width Screen porch

Historical Summary:Reverse identical house to 1535 Sheridan Road

Status (Current Listing or Designation)National: indiv. district landmrk.

State/Province: indiv. district landmrk.

Local: indiv. district landmrk.

Evaluation (Preparer's Assessment of Eligibility)Recommendation

Individually eligible Eligible as contributing resource Not eligible / non-contributing Not determined

Level of potential eligibility National State Local

Landmark potential National State Local

Inventory Sheet : 1533 Sheridan Rd Highland Park Lake Illinois

HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY FORM4.1.b

Packet Pg. 8

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

1 15

33-S

her

idan

Rd

Su

rvey

(15

33 S

her

idan

Ro

ad -

Dem

olit

ion

Rev

iew

)

Description/RemarksThis is a 2-story single-family residence in the Colonial Revival style built ca. 1925. The structural system is masonry. The foundation is poured concrete.Exterior walls are original brick. Molded cornice board with dentils; operable shutters with clips; decorative downspout; deteriorated gutter system/eaves Thebuilding has a gabled roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles. There is one side left, exterior, brick chimney. Windows are original wood, 6/1 double-hungsashes. There is a single-story, partial-width screen porch characterized by a flat roof with square wood posts.

Survey and RecorderProject: Highland Park, Illinois Sequence/Key no.: Survey Date: February 12, 2020

Prepared By: Douglas Kaarre, The Lakota Group Report Title/Name: Central East / Central Avenue +Deerfield Road Survey Update

Previous Surveys: 1999 Central East Survey

Inventoried: 01/07/2020 1:10:39 pmLast updated: 02/14/2020 1:54:05 pm by Doug Kaarre / 312.467.5445 x220

Level of Survey: Reconnaissance Intensive

Additional Research Recommended? Yes No

Inventory Sheet : 1533 Sheridan Rd Highland Park Lake Illinois

1533 Sheridan Rd Highland Park, Illinois (pg. 2)4.1.b

Packet Pg. 9

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

1 15

33-S

her

idan

Rd

Su

rvey

(15

33 S

her

idan

Ro

ad -

Dem

olit

ion

Rev

iew

)

City of Highland Park, Illinois26

Property EvaluationSIGNIFICANT AND CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS IN THE CENTRAL EAST SURVEY AREA

There are 347 principal buildings that were surveyed in the Central East survey area. Of these, 97 (28 percent) are ranked locally significant; 229 (66 percent) are ranked contributing to the character of a potential local historic district; and 102 (29 percent) are ranked non-contributing to a potential local historic district. Some of those that are ranked non-contributing are less than fifty years old and might be considered contributing to a historic district if they have special significance.

Sixteen (16) buildings are considered potentially eligible for individual listing in the National Register. If a National Register historic district were created, 229 (66 percent) would be contributing and 102 (29 percent) non-contributing. A National Register district generally does not include anything less than 50 years old.

SIGNIFICANT AND CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS IN THE CENTRAL/AVENUE/DEERFIELD ROAD SURVEY AREA

In the Central Avenue/Deerfield Road survey area there are 108 principal buildings. Of these, six (6 percent) are ranked locally significant; 66 (61 percent) are ranked contributing to the character of a potential local historic district; 42 (39 percent) are ranked locally non-contributing to a potential historic district.

None are considered potentially eligible for individual listing in the National Register. If a National Register historic district were created, 66 (61 percent) would be contributing and 42 (39 percent) non-contributing to that district.

Year Built Quantity Year Built Quantity

1870 - 1879 17 1960 - 1969 38

1880 - 1889 11 1970 - 1979 14

1890 - 1899 25 1980 - 1989 9

1900 - 1909 32 1990 -1999 41

1910 - 1919 33 2000 - 2009 37

1920 -1929 78 2010 - 2019 28

1930 - 1939 26 2020 - 2020 1

1940 - 1949 14 Not Recorded 3

1950 - 1959 54 Total 458

Table 1: Number of Properties by Date of Construction

4.1.c

Packet Pg. 10

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

2 C

entr

al E

ast

Su

rvey

(15

33 S

her

idan

Ro

ad -

Dem

olit

ion

Rev

iew

)

Highland Park Central East and Central Avenue/Deerfield Road Survey Update 27

Style Quantity Style Quantity

20th Century Commercial 3 Neo-Craftsman 15

Classical Revival 7 Neo-French 3

Collegiate Gothic Revival 2 Neo-Prairie 1

Colonial Revival 79 Neo-Renaissance 1

Contemporary 57 Neo-Shingle 38

Craftsman 18 Neo-Traditional 11

Dutch Colonial Revival 14 Neo-Tudor 3

Eclectic 2 Post Modern 10

Folk/traditional 21 Prairie 13

French Eclectic 9 Queen Anne 5

Georgian Revival 7 Shingle 1

International Style 20 Shingle Style 1

Italian Renaissance Revival 1 Spanish Colonial Revival 1

Italianate 9 Styled Ranch 28

Log House 2 Tudor Revival 8

Miesian 3 Vernacular 3

Minimal Traditional 3 Victorian Gothic Revival 8

Mission 1 Wrightian 13

Modern 31 Not Recorded 1

Neo-Craftsman 6 Total 458

Table 2: Number of Properties by Architectural Styles

4.1.c

Packet Pg. 11

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

2 C

entr

al E

ast

Su

rvey

(15

33 S

her

idan

Ro

ad -

Dem

olit

ion

Rev

iew

)

City of Highland Park, Illinois70

Colonial Revival

The Colonial Revival style dates from the 1876 centennial celebration until the mid- 1950s. Shepherded in by a wave of patriotism, nostalgia and by incidents such as the 1963 demolition of the celebrated John Hancock House, which shocked New England and the rest of the country,70 it became the most popular historical revival style throughout the country until after World War II. Many people chose Colonial Revival architecture because of its basic simplicity and its patriotic associations with early American 18th-century homes. Whether derived from stately red brick Georgian examples or more modest clapboard buildings, most of these buildings are symmetrical and rectangular in plan; some have wings attached to the side. Detailing is derived from classical sources, partly due to the influence of classicism that dominated the prominent exhibition buildings at the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition. Many front facades have classical -- temple-like -- entrances with projecting porticos topped by a pediment. Paneled doors flanked by sidelights and topped by rectangular transoms or fanlights are common, as are multi-pane double-hung windows with shutters. The variety for the sake of variety typical of the Queen Anne style was losing its attraction, and a more literal interpretation of historical styles began to take the place of the more romantic traditional styles of the 19th century. Streetscapes began to have a sedate air as blocks of quiet symmetrical facades lined suburban streets. Many Ranch houses built in the 1950s have Colonial Revival details. There is a revival of the traditionalism exhibited in the Colonial Revival style even in the 1990s with some “Neo-Colonial” houses being built.

Colonial Revival is by far the most popular style, with 80 examples in the survey areas. Of these, 70 are located within the Central East survey area and 10 within the Central Avenue/Deerfield Road survey area.

75 Massey, James C. and Maxwell, Shirley. “Early Colonial Revival” Old House Journal, March-April, 1990. p. 45.

180 Laurel Avenue, Colonial Revival/Craftsman (c. 1920)

1643 Linden Avenue, Colonial Revival (1924)

4.1.c

Packet Pg. 12

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

2 C

entr

al E

ast

Su

rvey

(15

33 S

her

idan

Ro

ad -

Dem

olit

ion

Rev

iew

)

Highland Park Central East and Central Avenue/Deerfield Road Survey Update 71

The earliest Colonial Revival house dates from about 1895, with the most recent being from the 1970s. Half of these were built from the 1920s through the 1940s when the North Shore enjoyed its greatest population growth. The following 15 buildings in the Central East survey area were ranked locally significant: 160 Central Avenue; 1540 Hawthorne Lane; 1707 and 1729 Lake Avenue; 67, 133, and 180 Laurel Avenue; 1615 and 1643 Linden Avenue; 426 Ravine Drive; 1375, 1391 and 1523 Sheridan Road; 1380 and 1442 Waverly Road.

Locally prominent architect Robert Seyfarth designed the Churchill House at 1375 Sheridan Road in 1919. Basically rectangular, the facade is organized into a main, symmetrical section with five bays, with a side section of the same height. The house is wood shingle and has multi-light wood double-hung windows throughout. A notable feature is the classical broken pedimented front entry with engaged pilasters. Another characteristic Colonial Revival house is the 1924 brick house with slate roof at 1643 Linden Avenue. This two and ½ story house has a gabled front entry portico with Doric columns. The entry door has a fanlight and multi-light sidelights.

There are also gable-roofed dormers in the front, and fanlight attic windows in the side gables. As is typical of the Colonial Revival style, windows are wood, double hung, six over one lights (an upper sash divided into six panes of glass and a lower sash with a single large pane).

One of the Colonial Revival houses in the Central Avenue/Deerfield Road Survey Area, at 1660 Second Street, is ranked locally significant. Built c.1920, it is basically symmetrical with a central front entry porch with brick piers and wood entablature. There is a projecting central bay on the second floor with engaged pilasters.

1660 Second Street, Colonial Revival (c. 1920)

4.1.c

Packet Pg. 13

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

2 C

entr

al E

ast

Su

rvey

(15

33 S

her

idan

Ro

ad -

Dem

olit

ion

Rev

iew

)

4.1.d

Packet Pg. 14

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

3 E

xist

ing

Pic

s (

1533

Sh

erid

an R

oad

- D

emo

litio

n R

evie

w)

4.1.d

Packet Pg. 15

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

3 E

xist

ing

Pic

s (

1533

Sh

erid

an R

oad

- D

emo

litio

n R

evie

w)

4.1.d

Packet Pg. 16

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

3 E

xist

ing

Pic

s (

1533

Sh

erid

an R

oad

- D

emo

litio

n R

evie

w)

4.1.ePacket Pg. 17 A

4.1.e

Packet Pg. 18A

4.1.e

Packet Pg. 19

A

4.1.f

Packet Pg. 20

Att

4.1.g

Packet Pg. 21

Att

ach

men

t: A

ttac

hm

ent

6 H

P L

oca

l New

spap

er E

xcer

pt

(15

33 S

her

idan

Ro

ad -

Dem

olit

ion

Rev

iew

)

Documents

Historic Preservation Commission