Upload
dangkhuong
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2nd Central and Eastern European Meeting on Viral Hepatitis and Co-Infection with HIV
HIV/Hepatitis co-infectionsituation in
Czech and Slovak Republics
Viktor ASTER, MD, PhDDepartment of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Hospital Bulovka,
First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, District Hospital Liberec.
Disclosure:I have no disclosure
2nd Central and Eastern European Meeting on Viral Hepatitis and Co-Infection with HIV
: Central and Eastern Europe?
HIV, HBV and HCV in The Czech Republic
Prevalence Annual Incidence CommentsHIV 0,026%1)
2480 p. living with HIV266 cases (y.2015)1)
25,2/1000 000 inhabitantsincreasing
trend
HBV 0,14% HBsAg+3)
3,2% anti-HBc IgG+3) 89 cases of acute VHB (y.2015)1)
8,5/1 000 000 inhabitantsdecreasing
Trend
HCV 1,67% anti-HCV+2)
0,93% HCV RNA+956 cases (y.2015)1)
91/1 000 000 inhabitantsincreasing
trend(originally till 2014: 0,37% anti-HCV+)3)
Co-infectedHIV/HBV
2,1% HBsAg+,37,5% anti-HBc IgG+4)
unknown
Co-infectedHIV/HCV
10,9% anti-HCV+4) unknown
1) National institute of Health, 20162) Chlibek R, University ofDefence, 20153) Chlibek R, University ofDefence, 20144) Aster V, Polakova A, Nemecek V, Maly M, September 2013, Snopkova S, June 2015
HIV subtypes
Prevalence of Different Subtype/Genotype in Czech Republic
HIV Subtype Distribution: A = 11,4%, B = 74,8%, Other = 13,8%
2nd Central and Eastern European Meeting on Viral Hepatitis and Co-Infection with HIV
HIV-1 SUBTYPE
A B C D F G CRF01_AE CRF02_AG CRF03_AB CRF06_cpx other Total
n 189 1240 49 7 6 14 58 24 0 9 61 1657
% 11,4% 74,8% 3,0% 0,4% 0,4% 0,8% 3,5% 1,4% 0,0% 0,5% 3,7% 100,0%
Maly M, Nemecek V, National institute of Health, 2016
HCV Genotype and Subtype and Q80K mutation distribution in Czech R.
HCV Genotype Distribution:
(common population)1a = 25%, 1b = 25%, 3 = 46.4%, other = 3,6% 1)
Comment: • growing prevalence of GT 3, (originally
GT 1b 80%), • growing prevalence of subtype 1a,• GT 4 still rare exept HIV+ MSM
HCV GT distribution in common population.Chlibek R, 2016: 3 centers: Hradec Kralove, Brno, Ceske Budejovice, n=3000
GT 1a/b; 16%
GT 1a; 29%
GT 1b; 14%
GT 3; 25%
GT 4;16%
1a: 25%
1b: 25%
3: 46,40%
other: 3,60%
HCV GT distribution in HIV+ Aster V, Patients treated for VHC since 2003 till 2016. AIDS-Center Prague. n=46
Detection of Q80K mutation in HCV NS3 protease gene in Hradec Kralove – initial experiencePliskova L1, Kutova R1, Plisek S2, Stepanova V31 Inst. Clin. Biochemistry and Diagnostics - Dept. Mol. Biol., 2 Clinic of Infectious Diseases, 3 Inst. Clin. Microbiology – Virology Dept., University Hospital and Fakulty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. Poster, Lisabon 2016
20%
80%
Q80K positive: 20% n=60
Main Risk factors for Transmission
HIV MSM = 65%, Hetero = 24% IVDU = 4%
HBV Sexual (till 1989 nosocomial)exact data not available
HCV IVDU (common population), sexual (in MSM, esp. HIV+)exact data not not available
HOM; 1857; 65%
HET; 689; 24%
IDU; 105;
4%UNK; 80; 3%IDU+HOM+HET; 60; 2% HEM; 17; 1% TRF; 14; 1% VER; 9; 0%NOS;
5; 0%Main Risk factorsfor HIV Transmissionin The Czech Republic
HOM HET IDU UNK IDU+HOM+HET HEM TRF VER NOS
Antiretroviral Treatment Currently available
HIV First line regimens: % NNRTI, % PI/r, % INI complete exact data not availableTrend in The Czech R.: decreasing use of PI, increasig use of InSTI
Drugs availablein Czech R.
TDFFTC/TDF FTC/ TDF /EVG/COBIFTC/ TAF /EVG/COBIFTC/ TDF /RPVABC/3TC3TC/ZDVRALDRVLPV/RTVATVEFVETVRPVRTVDTGDTG/ABC/3TCDRV/COBIATV/COBI
Most common ARV combinations in Czech R.
DRV/RTV/FTC/TDF
DRV/COBI/FTC/TDF
LPV/RTV/FTC/TDF
RPV/FTC/TDF
EVG/FTC/TDF
RAL/FTC/TDF
DTG/FTC/TDF
RAL/ABC/3TC
DTG/ABC/3TC
DTG/ABC/3TC1) Snopkova S, AIDS Center Brno. Protrombotic state in HIV+ persons, using ARV drugs. Institutional support Ministry of Health 2016.
2) Snopkova S, AIDS Center Brno, 2016.
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%
60,00%
70,00%
80,00%
90,00%
100,00%
NRTI NNRTI INSTI PI InhCCR5
Fus Inh
86,20%
25,20% 35,80%
62,60%
4,10%
1,60%
92,50%
23,10%
38,50%
53,50%
3,30% 0%
ARV drugs used in pt´s from AIDS-Center Brno in July 2015 n=123 and in June 2016 n=186 1) 2)
2015 2016
Anti-VHC/VHB Treatment Currently available
HBVAll drugs well
available, TBV not registered
ETV, TDF 3TC (exeptionally in pt´s with poor prognosis and in pt´s with serious
courses of acute VHB) Peg-IFN (decreasing trend of usage) Temporary prophylaxis in immunocompromised persons: 3TC still
more common than TDF
HCVStill limited access
to IFN-free regimens
DAA available: LDV/SOF, 3D, SOF, DCV, ASV, SMV. „specific program“ with ASV/DCV , „window“ between approval and reimbursement
Guidelines derived from EASL guidelines % of interferon use: unknown, but still most pt´s treated by IFN
containing regimens (F0-F2) INF-free regimens: for F3 and F4 pt´s, available in 15 centers in C.R.
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
died (not started)
started IFN-free
waiting
2
18
30
4
17
Number of patients
IFN-free VHC treatment in Hepatologic Center Hospital Bulovka, Prague Aster V, September 2016
non HIV
HIV+
Patients on HAART, supressed pt´s and number of dying
Percent of Patients on
HAART
Percent of patient suppressed (<20)
Number Dying in Stage AIDS
HIV Czech R. unknown unknown 250 (70%)(out of 356 HIV+ dying) 3)
AIDS Center Brno
97,4%(186 out of 191 pt´s)1)
82,1%(n=123, 65% with
CD4>500)2)
1) Snopkova S, AIDS Center Brno, June 2016. 2) Snopkova S, AIDS Center Brno. Protrombotic state in HIV+ persons, using ARV drugs. Institutional support Ministry of Health , Dec 2015.3) Nemecek V, Maly M, National institute of Health, Aug 2016
0
5
10
15
20
2519
8719
8819
8919
9019
9119
9219
9319
9419
9519
9619
9719
9819
9920
0020
0120
0220
0320
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
16
num
ber d
ying
patie
nts
Number of Dying HIV+ pt´s in Czech R. till Aug 2016 3)
non-AIDS
AIDS2480; 87% 356;
13%
Living and Dying HIV+ pt´s in Czech R. till Aug 2016 n=2836 3)
living
dying
HBV-infection in The Czech Republic
Percent of Patients on
Therapy
Of Those TreatedPercent of Patients
Suppressed
Number Dying of Cirrhosis/Hepatoma
HBV unknown presuption:HBV DNA negative>(95%)
Unknown/presumption: 20 ptdying of hepatoma
3,80%
LTx. for HBV infectionIKEM 1995-April2015.
N=1187 LTx in 1122 recipients 1)
HBV
other Dg.
1) Trunecka P, et all. Twenty years programme of liver transplatation in IKEM-indications and results. XLIII. May Hepatologic Days 2015. Oral presentation.
HCV infection in The Czech Republic
Percent of Patients Received Therapy Of Those TreatedPercent of Patients Cured
Number Dying of Cirrhosis/ Hepatoma
HCV 40-50%(presumption in diagnosed cases)
unknown unknown/dying of Hepatoma:20 ptś /y (presumption)
Presumption in diagnosed cases: 500 living HCV infected pt´s in cirrhosis stage (2016)1)
1) Urbanek P. 20162) Trunecka P et all, IKEM (Institute of Clinical and Experimetnal Medicine, Prague) 20163) Frankova S, IKEM (Institute of Clinical and Experimetnal Medicine, Prague) 2016
Time to Tx on waiting list in The Czech R.: 84 days on average2)
Frankova S., IKEM
186 LTx.
16%
Percentage of LTx.for HCV infection,
IKEM 1995-Sept. 2016. n=1371 2)
HCV other Dg.0 50 100 150
LTx for HCV 1996-2013
LTx for HCV 2013-Sept.2016
48
25
101
12
Number of LTx.for HCV infection,
IKEM: increased incidence of HCC in LTx. For HCV3)
HCC Yes without HCC
HIV, HBV and HCV in The Slovak Republic
Prevalence Annual Incidence Co-infectionHIV 0,015%1)
796 p. living with HIV 1)86 cases (y.2015)1)
14,6/1000 000 inhabitants 1)
HBV 2,8% HBsAg+2,3)
15,9% anti-HBc IgG+2),3)
1,80% HBV DNA+2)3)
5% HIV/HBV coinfection4)
(HBsAg+)
HCV 1,52% anti-HCV+2)
0,67% HCV RNA+(new study in process)
5% HIV/HCV coinfection4)
(HCV RNA+)
1) Stanekova, 20152) Jarcusca P. HepaMeta
Study 20133) Veseliny E, et al. High
Hepatitis B and LowHepatitis C Prevalence in Roma Population in EasternSlovakia.CentralEuropean Journal ofPublic Health 2014, suppl 1, 1.
4) Jarcucka P,June 2014
796; 93%
14; 2% 47; 5%
Number of dying HIV+ persons in Slovakia n=857, June 2016
living dying non AIDS dying AIDS
64,9
23,6
2,2
0,19,2
HIV infection according mode ofacquisition in Slovakia in % n=857
HO
HET
IVDU
TRF
unknown
Conclusions Prevalence of HIV infection in The Czech Rebulic is still low, but is apparently
growing, predominatly in MSM Relatively growing use of InSTI Prevalence of HCV infection in Czech R. is higher than was originally supposed The use of IFN containing regimens is still common in VHC treatment and
access to IFN-free regimens is still not satisfactory (even for F3 and F4 pt´s) No VHC treatment special budget for HIV co-infected population in C.R. HCV GT4 is rare, but not in HIV+MSM Relatively growing prevalence of HCV GT3 and GT 1a
growth of residents from other countries (Ukraine) growth of new HCV infections from I.V. drug abuse population
relatively short time to Tx on waiting list in The Czech Republic Increased incidence of HCC in LTx. for HCV Slovakia versus Czech R.:
2x lower prevalence of HIV infection, 20x higher prevalence of HBV infection similiar prevalence of HCV infection
GREEN GATE BUCHARESTVaclav Cervenka,
Green Gate architect
Acknowledgement• SNOPKOVA Svatava, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
• FRANKOVA Sona, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
• URBANEK Petr, Clinic of Internal Diseases, Central Military University Hospital Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
• CHLIBEK Roman, 4Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
• MALY Marek, National Reference Laboratory for HIV/AIDS, National Institute of Health, Prague, Czech Republic
• NEMECEK Vratislav, National Reference Laboratory for HIV/AIDS, National Reference Laboratory for Viral Hepatitis, National Institute of Health, Prague, Czech Republic
• SHUNNAR Azzaden, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia
• JARCUSKA Peter, 1st Department of Internal Medicine, P. J. Safarik University in Kosice, Faculty of Medicine and L. Pasteur University Hospital, Kosice, Slovakia
• All colleageous from AIDS-Center Prague